Tuesday, July 14, 2026

 

New research links television and movie content with racial bias in children



Psychology study shows role of media consumption in the formation of prejudices during childhood




New York University





It has been well-established that the developmental roots of racial prejudices emerge in early childhood, but scientists have a less clear understanding of how various influences affect these attitudes.

A new study in the journal American Psychologist offers some insight into these questions.

It found that White children whose favorite movie or television show portrayed fewer Black characters—relative to other movies or shows—were less likely to choose to play with a Black child, held less positive attitudes towards Black children, and were more likely to attribute Black-White inequalities to racial differences.

These findings were particularly strong in shows and films that showed few Black characters in high-status contexts or roles, such as authority figures or wealthy princesses. These results indicated that the dearth of Black characters in respected or sought-after positions contributed to views of racial bias among the study’s participants.

“Our findings highlight the role media play in the development of racial biases during childhood and underscore the importance of monitoring the messages young children receive when consuming media,” says Michael Rizzo, a postdoctoral researcher at New York University at the time of the study and now an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

“The good news is these findings offer pathways for addressing racial biases before they become deeply entrenched,” adds Marjorie Rhodes, a professor in NYU’s Department of Psychology and the paper’s senior author, who previously uncovered ways to reduce bias in children. “Compared with other environmental contributors to children’s biases, addressing the contents of media children consume is more straightforward. For instance, portraying more characters of color in high-status roles could be beneficial in shaping children’s attitudes about those of other races.”

Researchers have analyzed the impact of entertainment content on children’s beliefs and attitudes for decades. However, less studied is how this content is influential over time. 

To better understand this phenomenon, Rizzo and Rhodes, along with researchers from the University of Connecticut and the University of California, Santa Cruz, conducted a study of nearly 600 White children in the United States for a year. This longitudinal study of children—four to eight years old—allowed the authors to see the impact of content on racial attitudes as it was consumed in children’s natural environments and over a 12-month period.

How the study was done

The American Psychologist research was part of a larger, online longitudinal study examining the psychological processes and developmental mechanisms underlying the emergence of racial biases in US children. Overall, the researchers asked the participants about their playmate preferences and their beliefs about racial inequalities while taking into account the types of programs they were watching—as reported by the children’s parents—and how these programs depicted characters of different races. This approach allowed the study’s authors to see if program content had any influence on the children’s attitudes and beliefs over time.

Attitudes and Beliefs

Children were shown faces of children on a computer screen (Asian, Black, Latine, and White) and asked who they would like to play with most. They were also shown faces of Black and White children and asked, “How nice do you think this child is?” and “How much do you like this child?”

They were also told about an example of a racial inequality and were asked to think about why that inequality exists. In this commonly used method, participants were shown images of a Black child who lived in a low-wealth house and a White child who lived in a high-wealth house and then asked to think about why each child lived in their respective house: “Because of things that happen in the world” (extrinsic reasons) or “Because of who they are inside” (intrinsic reason).

Parents and Content

In a survey, the children’s parents listed their child’s top three favorite shows or programs, how much they (the parents) valued racial diversity in their child’s friend group, their political affiliation, and their residential zip code. Parents’ values, politics, and the racial demographics of children’s zip codes (i.e., the proportion of White people in their residential zip code drawn from US Census data) served as control variables in the analyses in order to isolate the effects of children’s media consumption.

A total of 29 television shows and movies depicting primarily human characters were selected based on their popularity—as reported by their parents—amongst the participants. The content included nearly 11,000 characters across more than 2,000 scenes.

The researchers coded three three aspects of racial representation within these programs: overall racial representation; low-, middle-, and high-status context representation; and high-status role representation. For instance, scenes were coded as high-status if they contained clear cues to wealth or power, including castles or mansions, luxury vehicles, and depictions of wealthy people.

White characters were overrepresented in high-status contexts and roles compared to their overall representation in these programs. In addition, the participants were more likely to watch media with White characters than they were those with Asian, Black, and Latine characters.

What the researchers found

Overall, the results showed a connection between the children’s favorite television shows and movies and racial attitudes—depending on how Black and White characters were depicted:

  • Children whose favorite media depicted a higher proportion of White relative to Black characters said they were less likely to choose to play with a Black child and were less likely to have positive attitudes towards Black children, even after taking into account their parents’ values and politics as well as neighborhood demographics.
  • Children were more likely to choose a playmate—regardless of race—when the playmate’s racial group was more frequently represented in high-status contexts in children’s favorite media—regardless of their parents’ values, politics, and neighborhood demographics.
  • Children whose favorite media depicted a higher proportion of White relative to Black characters in high-status contexts were less likely to choose to play with a Black child and more likely to endorse an intrinsic over extrinsic explanation for racial inequalities.
  • Older children whose favorite media depicted a higher proportion of White relative to Black characters when they started the study became less likely to choose to play with the Black child over a one-year period. However, significant effects were not found for children’s explanations for racial inequalities.
  • Notably, there were no effects or White children’s attitudes toward other White children, suggesting that consuming media with more Black characters does not reduce children’s positive feelings towards others of their own race.

“The relationship between media consumption and racial biases is likely dynamic and self-perpetuating: Children who watch biased media develop more racial biases, which leads them to favor media that reflect and reinforce those biases,” the authors write. “Our findings speak to the importance of breaking this cycle as early as possible.”

The study’s other authors were NYU researchers Megan Moran, Chrystelle Leveille, Alex Boyd, Cassandra Chum, and Jonathan Liles as well as Sydney Klein, a doctoral candidate at the University of Connecticut, and Tobias Britton, a doctoral candidate at UC Santa Cruz.

The research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-2017375) and Beyond Conflict.

# # #

 

 

 

Strongly underestimated sources of methane: Water bodies in the Amazon Rainforest



Comprehensive aircraft measurements reveal that methane emissions from Amazon wetlands are significantly higher than previously estimated



Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

Amazon wetlands 

image: 

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas. Its concentration in the atmosphere has increased significantly in recent decades. Anthropogenic emissions can be easily quantified. Natural sources, such as the Amazon wetlands, are difficult to measure. Reasons for this include, for example, a lack of measurement data and persistent cloud cover, which interferes with satellite observations.

view more 

Credit: Linda Ort, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry





Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas whose concentration in the atmosphere has risen sharply in recent decades. Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane to the atmosphere, but large uncertainties remain about how much methane comes from wetlands and how these emissions may be increasing in response to a changing climate. Tropical wetlands, including in the Amazon, produce substantial amounts of methane, but accurately estimating their emissions sources and magnitudes remains difficult. One reason is the lack of measurement data, especially in the tropics, where extensive cloud cover interferes with satellite observations and ground-based measurements are sparse. 

An international research team led by the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry has now determined, using aircraft measurements, that actual emissions in the Amazon region were significantly higher than those estimated by climate and Earth system models. In certain areas, methane emissions are even four times higher than previously calculated. The findings, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, have important implications for the accuracy of climate projections.

Established models are reaching their limits

“The discrepancies between model calculations and reality motivated me to find out where the missing methane comes from,” says Linda Ort of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry. The atmospheric chemist and lead author of the study notes that at altitudes of six kilometers or higher, the measured and modeled data align quite well. However, the closer to the Earth’s surface, the greater the discrepancy became. On average, the measured methane levels were about twice as high above the background level as the corresponding model values. 

At the time of the measurements in December 2022 and January 2023, the background level in the atmosphere was about 1,907 parts per billion (ppb), but it has risen again since then. The unit ppb (parts per billion) is used to precisely describe very low mixing ratios, such as those found in trace gases in the atmosphere. Ort attributes this to the fact that methane mixes well in the atmosphere at high altitudes and the models accurately represent the transport of air masses and mixing effects. However, the models fail at lower altitudes.

A closer examination of the sources revealed that in some areas of the Amazon wetlands release up to four times more methane than previously assumed. Broken down by wetland type, the values were, for example, 26 percent higher at river deltas, 19 percent higher at reservoirs, and 13 percent higher in regularly flooded river areas.

The researchers collected their data over a two-month period between December 2022 and January 2023. This time window falls precisely during the transition from the dry season to the wet season—a phase in which biomass burning typically does not occur, meaning the measurements were not strongly impacted by human activity. While methane emissions are even higher during the actual rainy season, they are lower during the dry season, which roughly balances them out. Thus, the two months during which the measurements took place roughly correspond to the annual average of wetland emissions.

Extensive measurement flights between the dry and wet seasons

Using sensors aboard the HALO research aircraft, Ort and the international team measured methane concentrations at various altitudes over a vast area of the Brazilian rainforest. Flight altitudes ranged from just 200 meters above the treetops to over 14 kilometers. At more than 7,000 measurement points, the scientists collected data using an absorption spectrometer specially developed for HALO, which precisely detects the trace gas methane even at low air pressures, such as those found at high altitudes.

For their analyses, they divided the entire Amazon region into grid cells measuring 0.1 degrees × 0.1 degrees—a high resolution for emission maps. To link methane measured in the air to its sources on the ground, the researchers used an atmospheric transport model to trace air masses backward in time to the respective grid cell on the ground. Using a well-established NASA ensemble model estimating wetlands and a complex numerical method, they then calculated the actual amounts of methane released. The NASA ensemble model indirectly estimates methane emissions based on satellite measurements of land surface characteristics such as moisture, vegetation, and temperature.

“Our results show that there are still many underestimated sources of methane in tropical wetlands such as the Amazon Rainforest,” says Linda Ort, who participated in numerous measurement flights during the research campaign. According to Ort, more measurement data is needed to better identify these methane sources—some of which vary strongly—and to improve climate and Earth system models.

Methane Emissions: 35% from Natural Sources, 65% Anthropogenic

About 65% of global methane emissions come from anthropogenic sources such as agriculture, fossil fuel production and use, and waste management. The remaining 35% come from natural processes. Methane is produced in large quantities when organic material, such as dead plants and leaves, is decomposed underwater by microorganisms. One example is dams, when large areas of forest are flooded as a result. Although these man-made structures are primarily used for hydroelectric power generation, they are also considered natural sources of methane.

“These results underscore how important it is to better understand the processes that control methane formation in wetlands,” says Eric Kort, director of the Atmospheric Chemistry Department at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and a co-author of the study. “To reliably assess the global methane budget, we need significantly more measurements—not only in the Amazon region, but also in other data-poor tropical regions such as Central Africa and Southeast Asia.”

Participating Institutions

The study was conducted by an international team led by the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz. Scientists from Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Forschungszentrum Jülich, the Cyprus Institute in Nicosia, Cyprus, the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, USA, as well as the University of Washington and the University of Michigan, USA, also contributed.

Background: CAFE Brazil research Campaign

The aircraft measurements of methane emissions were part of the scientific campaign CAFE BRAZIL (Chemistry of the Atmosphere: Field Experiment in Brazil). Using the HALO research aircraft, scientists investigated natural chemical processes over the Amazon rainforest in December 2022 and January 2023; balloons, drones, and the ATTO research station complemented the measurements from the ground. 

One goal was to understand how the forest and its plant emissions affect atmospheric processes such as cloud formation. Collaboration with local partners in Brazil was key to the success of the research mission. Researchers from INPA (National Institute of Amazonian Research) and the University of São Paulo contributed their on-the-ground expertise.

 

Three Gorges 2025 Climate Report: Second-hottest year on record, worst autumn rains in 43 years




Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Annual variations in (a) temperature (units: °C), (b) precipitation (units: mm) and (c–d) acid rain monitoring over the TGR. 

image: 

Annual variations in (a) temperature (units: °C), (b) precipitation (units: mm) and (c–d) acid rain monitoring over the TGR.

view more 

Credit: Tong Cui






A report titled "Climate State of the Three Gorges Region in the Yangtze River Basin in 2025", with Senior Engineer Tong Cui of the National Climate Center, China as the first author and Researcher Prof. Xianyan Chen as the corresponding author, has been recently published in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters (AOSL). The report provides a systematic analysis of climatic anomalies and high-impact weather and climate events in the Three Gorges region during 2025. This is the seventh consecutive year that the National Climate Center has released its annual climate report for the Three Gorges Region in AOSL.

The report reveals that in 2025, the annual average temperature in the Three Gorges area was significantly above normal, registering 1.1°C higher than the climatological mean—making it the second warmest year since 1961. Meanwhile, the number of high-temperature days ranked third highest on record. During the summer in particular, persistent heatwaves swept across the central-eastern parts and the northwestern region, with many localities breaking historical temperature highs. In terms of precipitation, the annual total reached 1234.2 mm, which is 3.7% above the long-term average, with the eastern part of the region receiving particularly abundant rainfall. However, the rainfall was far from evenly distributed: spring heavy rainfall arrived earlier and with greater intensity, and its frequency markedly exceeded the climatic norm; summer torrential rains were fierce, with short-duration extreme downpours putting urban flood defenses to the test. 

Moreover, from September to October, the Three Gorges region experienced its longest autumn rain spell since 1983. Analysis indicates that this "extended" autumn rainy episode was driven by a tug-of-war between weak cold air masses and warm, moist airflows—although the cold air was not particularly strong, it frequently moved southward and repeatedly converged with warm, moisture-laden air from the South China Sea, ultimately resulting in widespread overcast and rainy conditions. These climatic features not only underscore the growing trend of extreme weather becoming more frequent, but also pose new challenges for regional disaster prevention and mitigation, as well as for the safe operation of major engineering projects.

Situated in the transitional zone between the Sichuan Basin and the Qinling-Daba mountainous area, the Three Gorges region is characterized by high mountains and deep valleys with substantial vertical elevation differences. This unique topography is the primary factor shaping its local climate, and the frequent occurrence of meteorological disasters in the region is closely linked to both terrain and climatic conditions. Therefore, continuous climate and environmental monitoring in this area is of great significance.

According to Tong Cui, since 1996, multiple Chinese government agencies have jointly established the ecological and environmental local climate monitoring network for the Three Gorges Project. The "Climate State Report of the Three Gorges Region" is a flagship product of this network. To date, the monitoring network has accumulated over 60 years of continuous meteorological data. These invaluable first-hand data and research findings not only provide a solid scientific foundation for revealing the patterns and impacts of climate change in the Three Gorges region, but also constitute an indispensable data asset for ensuring the safe operation of the Three Gorges Project and for the long-term ecological monitoring system in the area.

 

New knowledge synthesis for policy: Ecological characterization of peatlands and coastal lagoons in Europe




Pensoft Publishers






A new synthesis report, titled "Ecological Characterisation of Peatlands and Coastal Lagoons in Europe," has been published to support the assessment, monitoring, and restoration of European wetlands under EU environmental legislation. The report was prepared in response to a policy request submitted by the Directorate-General for Environment (DG ENV) to the European Commission's Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD), and delivered by the Science Service for Biodiversity (SSBD), currently under development by the BioAgora project. 

The report provides an ecological characterisation of two contrasting Annex I habitat groups under the Habitats Directive: inland peat-forming wetlands (Group 7, “Raised bogs, mires and fens”) and coastal lagoons (habitat type 1150). Its findings are intended to inform monitoring and condition assessment under the Habitats Directive (HD), the Water Framework Directive (WFD), and the Nature Restoration Regulation (NRR). 

Extent and status of wetland loss 

European wetlands have undergone substantial historical loss, with an estimated 80% of the wetland area present a century ago no longer extant, and more than half of remaining peatlands drained. Despite their comparatively limited spatial extent, peatlands are estimated to store nearly one-third of global soil carbon, while coastal lagoons account for approximately 13% of the global coastline and support disproportionately high levels of biological productivity and biodiversity. 

Hydrology as the principal determinant of ecosystem condition 

The report identifies hydrological regime as the dominant control on the functioning of both habitat groups. In peatlands, a persistently high and stable water table sustains the anoxic conditions that suppress decomposition and allow peat to accumulate. When the water table falls - most often through drainage – peat oxidises, subsides and compacts, vegetation and microbial communities shift, and fire risk increases. Because the structure of the peat is itself altered, much of this is effectively irreversible, and a long-term carbon sink can become a net source of greenhouse gases. In coastal lagoons, freshwater–marine exchange, hydrographic and associated biological connectivity and physico-chemical gradients, regulate hydrodynamics, sediment transport, nutrient availability, community structure, and biological productivity, and are associated with substantial natural variability and spatiotemporal heterogeneity independent of anthropogenic pressure. 

Multiple interacting pressures 

Degradation in both habitat groups is most attributed to combinations of pressures rather than to single causal factors. Drainage and land-use conversion, nutrient enrichment, peat extraction, contaminant inputs, coastal development, and climate change act together and rarely in isolation, reinforcing one another through feedback that are often non-linear and context-dependent. Because pressures compound in this way, ecological deterioration is difficult to detect, attribute, and reverse.  

Indicator frameworks and assessment methodology 

The report concludes that no single indicator is sufficient to characterize ecosystem conditions in either habitat group. It proposes tiered indicator frameworks distinguishing essential from complementary variables across hydrological, physico-chemical, biological, and functional dimensions. Assessment designs must account for the natural scales of spatial and temporal variability, and for historical trends in the context of ecological succession – without this, frameworks risk mistaking intrinsic ecosystem dynamics for anthropogenic impact. Earth Observation should be integrated with in-situ measurement, keeping in mind that it is most reliably applied to hydrological and vegetation-related metrics, and requires field-based calibration and validation. 

Recommendations for future monitoring architecture 

Wetland monitoring across Member States remains fragmented and inconsistent. The report sets out a transition pathway towards an integrated observation architecture combining Earth Observation, in-situ measurement, numerical modelling, and digital twin approaches. It recommends a dual design: standardised routine monitoring, designed to capture relevant spatial and temporal heterogeneity, alongside adaptive, event-specific monitoring able to respond to extreme events and unforeseen impacts. Such a system would reduce the reporting burden on Member States, improve comparability between regions, and distinguish early warning signals from indicators of consolidated change. The report identifies this architecture as a foundation for a future EU Wetland Watch service, built on local and national observation systems integrated into a European-scale network. The report is explicitly a scientific foundation rather than an operational assessment protocol. Calibration of habitat-specific condition thresholds - capable of distinguishing favourable condition from early and severe degradation across the range of peatland types and lagoon contexts present in the EU - is identified as the critical next step, requiring coordinated analysis of monitoring data and reference conditions across Member States. 

About the report 

The report was prepared by a multidisciplinary expert group coordinated by the BioAgora project and the Science Service for Biodiversity, in response to a policy request from the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Environment to the EC Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD). It is published by the Publications Office of the European Union and is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. 

Access the report here

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Funded by the European Union under grant agreement No. 101059438, BIO-Agora (Bio Knowledge Agora:  Developing the Science Service for European Research and Biodiversity Policymaking). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. 

Citation: Cetinic, K.A., Pérez-Ruzafa, Á., Boix, D., Cravo-Laureau, C., Klimkowska, A., et al, Ecological characterisation of peatlands and coastal lagoons in Europe, Blasi, M., Korcheva, A., Vasilakopoulos, P. and Velasco Gomez, D.M. (editors), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2026, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/9963649, JRC146927.

 

W&M’s VIMS & Batten School partner with NOAA to expand access to shallow water mapping data in the Chesapeake Bay



New program turns marine debris removal and other local vessel activity into valuable bathymetric data collection




Virginia Institute of Marine Science

Bathymetry partners 

image: 

E.C. Hogg (front) and Ralph Bonniville (back) are TRAP participants who gather bathymetric data.

view more 

Credit: John Wallace, W&M's VIMS & Batten School





GLOUCESTER POINT, VA. — A new partnership between William & Mary’s VIMS & Batten School and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) turns routine vessel operations and lost crab trap removal into a new source of valuable bathymetric data.

Bathymetry describes the depth and shape of the seafloor relative to a known elevation reference and is essential to understanding and managing coastal environments. Accurate bathymetric data are foundational to a wide range of scientific, planning and management applications, including coastal resilience, hurricane and storm surge forecasting, sediment transport, habitat mapping, fisheries management and navigation safety. Bathymetry data is a valuable tool, particularly in shallow, nearshore areas that are difficult and expensive to map using traditional methods.

The collaboration was formalized through the recognition of VIMS & the Batten School as a “Trusted Node,” a designation by NOAA and the International Hydrographic Organization acknowledging reliable partners for collecting, processing and submitting bathymetric data for public use. Only 16 other organizations worldwide have been awarded this status.

The partnership builds on work already underway at VIMS & the Batten School’s Center for Coastal Resources Management (CCRM), where researchers have been collecting bathymetric data through the Shallow-Water Hydrographic Observation and Assessment Logging program. In addition to gathering depth information during vessel-based research activities, CCRM has collaborated with participants in the National Trap Removal, Assessment & Prevention (TRAP) Program to also record bathymetric data. 

Funded through a 2023 award from the NOAA Marine Debris Program and administered by CCRM, the TRAP Program aims to remove derelict fishing gear from U.S. coastal waters. In the Chesapeake Bay and along Virginia’s Eastern Shore, CCRM outfits commercial fishers with side-scan sonar equipment to find and remove derelict crab traps during the offseason. This work provides watermen with an additional source of income while also advancing debris-removal efforts and generating valuable bathymetric data. 

“This project is expanding bathymetric data collection across the Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in the United States, including in shallow areas of six feet or less where accurate data have historically been scarce,” said CCRM Director Kirk Havens, who also noted the project’s remarkable return on investment. “By accessing past derelict trap removal depth data and equipping current TRAP participants with low-cost sonar units to passively collect bathymetric information, we have generated millions of new bathymetric data points at little to no additional cost to CCRM or NOAA. This demonstrates successful proof-of-concept for further crowdsourced data collection by TRAP participants here and nationwide.”

The data generated by VIMS & the Batten School and their TRAP partners is being processed and released in batches, and will be publicly available through NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information Bathymetric Data Portal. The new dataset can be accessed by researchers, agencies and coastal managers and can be used to enhance navigational safety to support commerce. 

“Accurate, shallow-water bathymetry is the missing puzzle piece for many of our coastal models and navigational charts,” said Rear Admiral (lower half) Christiaan van Westendorp, director of The Office of Coast Survey, NOAA’s ocean mapping and nautical charting program. “Through harnessing commercial mariners' presence and expertise, we unlock a new data stream and are able to better identify recent seafloor changes in areas notoriously difficult to survey. We look forward to transforming their contributions into actionable knowledge that protects lives and coastal economies." 

Researchers with the U.S. Geological Survey Coastal National Elevation Database Applications Project have already expressed interest in using the data to support shallow water void gap-filling in future regional high-resolution topobathymetric modeling efforts in the Chesapeake Bay region.


Bathymetry Map 

A boat track line map showing where bathymetry data was recorded by commercial fishers during derelict trap removal efforts in Virginia.

Credit

CCRM, W&M's VIMS & Batten School


 

PLOS responds to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) proposed rule



On May 29 2026, the Office of Management and Budget published a proposed rule change that would fundamentally alter how federal research funding is allocated in the US. The proposed changes have significant consequences for open science, public access and the integrity of the research record.

PLOS' letter is below.


Honorable Russell T. Vought

Director Office of Management and Budget

725 17th Street NW

Washington, DC 20503

July 10, 2026

Re: OMB-2026-0034, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance.

Dear Director Vought,

We are writing to provide comments on the proposal to revise the OMB Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance located in title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), subtitle A. PLOS is a nonprofit open science publisher working to accelerate progress in science and medicine by making research accessible to all, for the benefit of all.

The proposed rule raises significant concerns. It compromises the independence of research and the role of scientific expertise in federal grant making. It inserts barriers to scientific progress by restricting international collaboration, effective communication of research, conference participation, and contributions of scholarly societies. While PLOS understands the need to continuously drive for transparency and integrity across the research enterprise, the proposed rule does not offer valid solutions and instead threatens the principles of research independence and the efficiency of its conduct.

These concerns have been raised by many others, and we concur with the strong level of concern. In this response, we wish to focus on a specific element of the proposed rule that would affect how federally funded research outputs are made publicly available and reusable. This is where PLOS has direct experience and evidence, having been at the forefront of open science, transparency and public access since its founding in 2000.

Under § 200.461, the proposed rule treats publication costs as generally unallowable, except where required by statute or approved in advance on a case-by-case basis. We recognize that concerns about publishing costs are legitimate and should be addressed, but without supporting alternative models, removing all support for publication costs would have significant consequences for open science, public access and the integrity of the research record.

PLOS recent economic analysis of open science also points to the value created when research outputs can be accessed and reused. These benefits are not limited to the point of publication. They come through wider reuse, reduced duplication, faster discovery and application in new contexts. This is why costs linked to making research available should be assessed against the public and economic value they help unlock.

The proposed rule risks cutting across the goals it sets out to support. It would make federally funded research harder to share, find, scrutinize and reuse.

Research does not deliver its full value if it is completed but not effectively shared. Public access, dissemination, preservation, discoverability and reuse are not add-ons to the research enterprise. They are how research becomes useful to researchers, clinicians, patients, educators, policymakers, businesses and the wider public. They are also how taxpayer-funded research supports innovation, evidence-based decision-making, clinical practice and further discovery.

The recent GAO report on federal research publishing costs reinforces the need for better cost transparency and more sustainable models. However, the framing of the report is problematic; public access should not be treated as synonymous with any single business model. Nor should the costs of open dissemination be considered separately from the wider costs of closed access, including subscription models that can be more expensive and limit who can read and use the research. The answer is not to make the costs that support public availability generally

unallowable. Cost scrutiny should help identify better ways to make federally funded research available and reusable. It should not treat open dissemination as an avoidable extra.

PLOS does not support the status quo. Indeed, PLOS has been actively experimenting with alternative business models to transition away from researcher-facing fees since 2021. The system for sharing research outputs must evolve. Costs should be scrutinized. Models should be clearer and more accountable. Incentives should better support openness, integrity, reuse and public value. But the proposed ruling achieves none of this. Instead, by restricting support for publication and dissemination, it would move the system in the wrong direction. Making research outputs open, connected, trustworthy and reusable requires editorial processes, integrity checks, shared standards, technology, infrastructure and long-term stewardship. The policy question should be how this work is supported responsibly and fairly, not whether it should be treated as separate from the purpose of federally funded research or from the societal value that research is intended to create.

This direction of travel is reflected in PLOS recent Redefining Publishing: Practical pathways to open science work, which recognizes that scholarly communication needs to evolve beyond a system organized mainly around the final article and a single publication charge. Future models should support a more connected research record where articles, data, code, methods, protocols and other outputs can be linked, credited, checked and reused.

PLOS open corpus already shows the wider value of making research available for computational use. Open research can be read by people, mined by machines and used to support new tools for discovery and analysis. As AI becomes more embedded in research, open, trustworthy and well-structured outputs will become increasingly important to scientific impact and economic benefit. These approaches offer practical alternatives to the current system, but they still need support for the infrastructure, standards, editorial work and open science practices that make research trustworthy and useful.

Finally, the proposed rule also risks taking too narrow a view of how US-funded research delivers value. Research funded by US taxpayers should serve the American public, but science does not advance in isolation. International collaboration enables researchers to share expertise, test findings across contexts and improve and extend the value of their work. Open dissemination also supports the global standing of US science. Limiting support for dissemination, or treating international engagement as separate from public value, would make US-funded research less able to deliver on its public purpose.

PLOS supports reform proposals that make the systems for publishing and sharing federally funded research more accountable but despite its stated intent, this proposed rule doesn’t achieve that. Importantly, reform should not limit access to research or reduce its public value. It should make research outputs more available and useful, not create new barriers to collaboration and dissemination. For that reason, PLOS urges OMB to revise the proposed approach so that reasonable and necessary costs that support the public availability, integrity and reuse of federally funded open research outputs remain allowable where they support the objectives of the Federal award.

PLOS will continue to support the researchers, editors, reviewers and communities working to make science open and rigorous and to ensure publicly funded research can be shared and built upon for the benefit of all.

Thank you for your consideration of this response.

Sincerely,

 

Alison Mudditt

Chief Executive Officer

 

Veronique Kiermer

Chief Scientific Officer