Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Hind Rajab’s Family Says Israel’s Investigation Into Hind’s Death Just a PR Ploy

“Even now, all I hear is her crying, ‘I’m scared,’ and her plea: ‘Come here, Mama, take me,’” Hind’s mother said.
August 21, 2026

The grandmother of Hind Rajab holds a mobile phone displaying a picture of Hind on August 20, 2026.Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP via Getty Images

Hind Rajab’s mother has dismissed the Israeli military’s announcement this week that it is opening a supposed criminal investigation into the killing of her 5-year-old daughter, saying that it is nothing more than a PR move meant to distract from Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

“Why did the investigation and the acknowledgment of the shooting at Hind’s car and at the paramedics come only after more than two years?” Wesam Hamada, Hind’s mother, told the Associated Press on Friday. “It’s an attempt to distract from what’s happening in Gaza and improve the [Israeli] army’s image to the world. That’s it.”

On Wednesday, Israel’s military acknowledged that its soldiers played a role in the horrific series of events in January 2024, in which Hind, her 15-year-old cousin, and five members of their family were killed.

The military admitted to the slaughter of her adult family members, but did not take responsibility for the killing of Hind or her cousin Layan Hamada specifically, despite numerous independent investigations finding that they were shot by Israeli soldiers in a tank. Israeli soldiers have been found to be targeting children in Gaza, often with gunshots to the head, countless other times since Hind’s killing.

“I don’t trust the Israeli authorities, I don’t trust their government, and I don’t trust any justice system they have,” Hind’s mother said in an interview with NBC. “I don’t want an investigation used to whitewash anyone’s image.”


After Years of Denial, Israel Finally Admits to Role in Killing of Hind Rajab
Israel has maintained a PR campaign for years, supported by the US, denying its soldiers’ role in the brutal killing. By Sharon Zhang , Truthout  August 19, 2026


Hind’s grandmother, who is also named Hind Rajab, similarly dismissed the investigation. “For us this is not an admission but rather an attempt by the Israeli army to justify to the world how it committed the crime and how they executed Hind,” she told AFP. “The army is trying to justify its position to the world, claiming that what happened was a mistake and that the soldiers who committed it will be prosecuted.”

An Israeli tank sprayed the car carrying Hind and her family members with hundreds of bullets, despite having a clear line of sight to the children inside, an investigation by Forensic Architecture found.

After her family was killed, Hind remained trapped in the car with their bodies for hours, a tank looming nearby, as Palestinian Red Crescent workers waited for the Israeli military to give clearance for them to rescue her. In those hours, she spoke with rescuers and her mother on the phone. Recordings from the Palestinian Red Crescent documented the terrifying last hours of the little girl’s life before she was gunned down.

“I’m so scared, please come. Please call someone to come and take me,” Hind said to emergency dispatchers.

Rajab noted that Israel only acknowledged Hind’s killing because her harrowing phone call to rescuers became so widely known, pointing out that there are many other similarly horrific killings that Israel will never follow up on.

Hind’s family still mourns her death.

“She died with the most heartbreaking sound I’ve ever heard,” Hamada told NBC. “Even now, all I hear is her crying, ‘I’m scared,’ and her plea: ‘Come here, Mama, take me.’”

Hamada has demanded an independent investigation that will actually lead to answers. “I want to know who killed my daughter, who killed my family members, and who killed the paramedics who went to rescue her. Who gave the orders? Who fired the shots?”

 Islam Beyond Phobia

Hind Rajab, the 5-year-old killed in Gaza, should have been enough

(RNS) — Hind Rajab was killed while pleading for help in a car with her six dead relatives. On Wednesday (Aug. 19), the Israeli military acknowledged for the first time its firing on the car. 
Hind Rajab. (Photo courtesy of Palestine Red Crescent Society)

(RNS) — One child. Five years old. Trapped inside a car in Gaza City surrounded by the bodies of her dead relatives, pleading into a telephone for someone to come save her.

“Come take me. Please, will you come?”

The world heard Hind Rajab’s voice. We heard her fear. We knew rescuers were trying to reach her. The Palestine Red Crescent Society dispatched two paramedics after coordinating their passage to reach her.

They never reached Hind.

Twelve days later, Hind was found dead in the bullet-riddled car alongside six members of her family. The two paramedics were found dead in their destroyed ambulance roughly 50 meters away. A subsequent forensic investigation, conducted in collaboration with Al Jazeera, mapped 335 bullet holes in the family’s vehicle and concluded that the damage to the ambulance was consistent with Israeli munitions and that Israeli military vehicles were nearby.

On Wednesday (Aug. 19), more than two and a half years after she was killed, the Israeli military acknowledged that its troops had fired on the car and announced a criminal investigation into the family and medical workers’ deaths. The announcement comes after the military initially denied that its forces were even present near the vehicles or within firing range. The Hind Rajab Foundation, which has pursued the case internationally, dismissed the investigation as an attempt to create the appearance of accountability after years of impunity.

But there is a question before the question of whether this investigation will produce justice. That is: Why did we need thousands more dead children before Hind’s death was treated as something worthy of accountability?

Hind should have been enough because one child should always be enough.



The Quran teaches that “whoever unjustly takes a single life, it is as though he has killed all of humanity, and whoever saves one life, it is as though he has saved all of humanity.”

I have reflected on that verse countless times during these years of mass death. God does not allow us to hide the individual inside the statistic.

One life contains a world. One child contains a world. One terrified little girl waiting for an ambulance should contain enough humanity to stop armies, move governments and awaken consciences.

Instead, Hind became one name among thousands. Her story was later dramatized into the award-winning film “The Voice of Hind Rajab,” which moved audiences to tears with the audio of Hind pleading for rescue. The film received a lengthy standing ovation at its Venice Film Festival premiere and won the festival’s Grand Jury Prize.

The emotional response was overwhelming — but it also raised a harder question: If we needed a film to feel what was already happening in real time, what does that say about what we ignored? And if we had to make a film for every Palestinian child, or stand and pray a funeral (janaza) prayer for every one of them, would the world still be able to function, still be able to look away?

UNICEF reported that as of Feb. 3 of this year, at least 21,289 Palestinian children had been killed in Gaza since October 2023. Even after what the world called a ceasefire, Palestinian children continued to die. This month, UNICEF reported at least 300 children were killed during the 300 days following the ceasefire announcement in October 2025.

Bodies of members of the Hassayna and Abu Sharia families, killed in an Israeli strike in 2023 and recently recovered from the rubble, are draped in Palestinian flags during their funeral in Gaza City, Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2026. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

One child a day, even after a ceasefire was announced.

What does it say about us that Hind was not enough?

There is another Quranic passage I cannot stop thinking about when I think of Hind.

In describing the Day of Judgment, God paints a haunting scene: “And when the girl-child that was buried alive is asked for what sin she was killed.”

The verse is striking because God does not ask the murderer first. He asks the murdered child. The girl whose life society decided was disposable is brought forward before all of creation. The crime that people normalized on Earth becomes an indictment before God.

For what crime was she killed?

I imagine Hind being asked that question.

What was your crime, Hind?

Was it being Palestinian? Was it being born in Gaza? Was it sitting in a car? Was it surviving the bullets that killed the people around you? Was it asking someone to come get you?

There is no military justification that can make that question disappear. No internal investigation can bury it. No press release can answer it. Criminals can’t investigate themselves or issue statements to make it better.

One day, Hind herself gets to put her criminals on trial before God. But will we also be on trial for indifference? 

Hind Rajab should have been enough.



And accountability has certainly not been enough. It is not merely whether a soldier is disciplined or a government publishes an investigation. Accountability means believing that no victim disappears simply because the powerful have moved on.

The Quran’s insistence on the value of a single life is especially necessary in an age of mass death because numbers can become their own form of anesthesia.

Twenty thousand children. Two hundred journalists. Thousands of amputees.

Eventually, the human mind protects itself by turning people into arithmetic.

But Hind was not arithmetic.

She had a voice. We heard it. She was afraid. We heard that too. She waited for adults to save her. And we know how the story ended.

The question now is not merely whether the Israeli military can credibly investigate itself. Human rights organizations and journalists will rightly scrutinize that process. Israel’s record gives ample reason for skepticism. The more important question for the rest of us is why the killing of one little girl was not enough to force a moral reckoning in the first place.

If Hind had been enough, perhaps thousands of children would be alive.

The Quran does not say whoever kills thousands has killed humanity. It says whoever kills one. It also says whoever saves one life, it’s as if they’ve saved all of humanity. So perhaps that’s what we can now hold onto.

Saving another child from Hind’s fate should be enough to keep acting.

Because God knows something about us that we repeatedly forget: Once we permit ourselves to explain away the destruction of one innocent life, we have already crossed the moral boundary that makes the next one easier to explain away.

And when the girl who waited in that car is finally asked, “For what crime were you killed?” the rest of us should fear the questions that will be asked of those who heard her voice and still allowed thousands of children to follow her.


As a Palestinian From Gaza, I Can Study Abroad in Safety, But Never Visit Home

Our ability to study in safety is tied to a feeling of being emotionally trapped, for we are unable to return home.
August 22, 2026

Palestinian youths stand and swim along a rocky breakwater on the Mediterranean coast in Gaza City, on July 4, 2026.Ahmed Younis / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images

Since Israel’s war began in Gaza, Palestinian university students have seen their education and futures upended. All universities have been damaged or destroyed, campuses have closed, and around 88,000 students have been deprived of access to higher education, according to Palestinian officials. Friends of Palestinian Universities has reported that nearly 1,400 university students have also been killed.

For some students, obtaining a scholarship abroad is no longer a privilege to have; it is a necessity to reclaim a future interrupted by war. Many European countries and universities have opened their doors for those students, with scholarships and programs offering a chance for survival. Many Palestinians have managed to leave Gaza, but this comes with another kind of suffering: They can study in safety abroad, yet cannot return home to their families.

I paid that price when I left home.

I was evacuated from Gaza to Italy in December 2025 after the war destroyed my university and all of my city. I was fortunate to receive a scholarship that allowed me to continue my bachelor’s degree in Italy. I am safe here, and I have a place to rebuild my future. However, my family is still in Gaza.

This is my first summer away from my homeland. I live in an apartment with international students. In the past weeks, I watched them pack their stuff and book tickets to go home. I watched them leaving in excitement to see their families and friends after an exhausting academic year. But I had to stay behind.


For Gaza’s Students, International Scholarships Offer Both Hope and Heartbreak
This academic year, for the first time, Italy extended university scholarships to more than 180 students from Gaza.  By Sara Awad , Truthout February 14, 2026


I was afraid to experience that moment, and I wasn’t ready to see my own pain reflected so visibly in front of me.

Leaving Gaza never looked like taking a plane from one country to another. It was more complex, more complicated. Palestinian students do not simply buy a ticket and travel to their destination. They walk into authority proceedings that feel impossible to schedule in a short while. Gaza’s borders are totally controlled by Israel and there is no way to leave Gaza as before through the Rafah border, as Israel has imposed a total blockade on the borders.

Special humanitarian corridors have to be created by the host country, students face visa issues and travel restrictions, and agreements between the governments and Israeli authorities determine whether they can leave from Gaza. Every step has to align before the scholars can leave. And they leave with nothing but phones and identification documents.

These elaborate processes offered a way out but with no promise for a way back in. Freedom was given to us to leave, but something seems hollow about an idea of freedom that means one cannot return home.


Voices From Abroad



Many Palestinian students have been given a chance to continue their path elsewhere in Europe and beyond. Some made it to Ireland, others to France, as well as Spain and other countries. Those students each experience new lifestyles, new language, faces, and unfamiliar surroundings. But we all have the same painful reality of separation from our own family.

I spoke with three students who are living through the same contradictions as I am, but in a very different place and environment. I wanted to understand how this pain weighs on each of us.

Their pain is different but we all share the same trauma of war.

In Ireland, Abubaker Abed, 24, is a journalist and football reporter and commentator from Dair Al Balah, Gaza Strip. He left behind the life he had built in Gaza, along with the places, people and memories he was deeply attached to, in order to save whatever remained of his future.

“It hurts me that I haven’t seen my family for a year and a half. I feel so much pain,” Abed told me

.
Abubaker Abed is a Palestinian student from Gaza now in Ireland after surviving Gaza’s war in 2025.Sara Awad

He does not dream of returning to Gaza for only a holiday or a brief visit. He dreams of going home for good — to sit with his family in their own home, to live beside them without a screen or a border between them, and to feel safe together.

Abed’s suffering is not limited to the summer holiday. He is constantly reminded of his painful circumstances when he sees the freedom of movement enjoyed by other students. “I feel jealous when a colleague mentions a gathering of his family while I cannot even see mine,” he mentioned.

Abed wishes that all Palestinian students from Gaza might one day experience the full freedom of going back home whenever they need or wish. “We came from a traumatized state; we want our families alongside us,” he said.

Meanwhile, Ola Saed, who won a scholarship to pursue a master’s degree in international communication at Sciences Po Toulouse in France, describes how difficult it is to spend the summer doing nothing but working simply to keep herself busy.

“I feel very bad when the student accommodation is empty and quiet. I feel like I’ve lost the meaning of home,” Saed told me. “I did not leave — I was uprooted from my land.”

But there is another reality that many students face: They left with a scholarship, but the scholarship does not last forever. At some point, the funding, the university program, and the accommodation will end. One student facing this reality is Saja Hijaze, 23, a business and management student at the University of Jaén in Spain. She left Gaza through a six-month program that ended last month.

“All my colleagues packed their bags to go home. I stayed behind, facing a new and uncertain future,” Hijaze said through tears.


“I don’t have the desire to visit cities in Spain. I want to go to Gaza so much, even if all I find there is rubble.”

She longs to return to Gaza, to reconnect with the people she loves and regain a sense of home, safety, and familiarity. “I don’t have the desire to visit cities in Spain. I want to go to Gaza so much, even if all I find there is rubble,” Hijaze said.

The experience of separation from Gaza has taken a mental and emotional toll on all of us. Seeking professional support, including therapy, is one of the few things we can do to help ourselves navigate the weight of separation, loss, and uncertainty.

I spoke with Dr. Nouhaila Faida, a Moroccan-Italian psychologist who volunteers to support students from Gaza now studying and living alone in Europe. She described the ways prolonged separation from family, uncertainty about the future, and the experience of rebuilding a life far from home can affect students.

“Summer, which should be a time of rest, can instead deepen their isolation. Our first task is to give them an anchor — a safe space where they can be heard, their pain validated and their sense of connection rebuilt,” Faida said.

According to Tomaso Montanari, rector of the University for Foreigners of Siena in Italy and a supporter of Palestinian students from Gaza, “In Italy, even summer might be harder for Palestinian students.”

Montanari pointed out that the universities in Italy are not designed as residential communities. “In Italy, unlike in the United States or other countries, universities are not built around the college model: they generally do not have common spaces or permanent student residences,” Tomaso said.

These summer months feel particularly harsh for us. We are constantly reminded that we cannot enjoy them like how others do. Even visiting another city can feel offensive when our families are living through such a horrific situation back home.

Palestinian students from Gaza like me did not leave because we wanted a new home or a new country; we only wanted to have a future. But having a future should not come with the price of permanent separation from the people who are the meaning of life.

We were evacuated as students, but we did not leave Gaza as ordinary travelers, for we cannot return home.

Cardinal Brislin joins African clergy in calling Israel’s actions in Gaza genocide

VATICAN CITY (RNS) — Drawing on Africa’s experience of apartheid, genocide and war, Cardinal Stephen Brislin and nine other Catholic clergy say Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute genocide — and argue silence is no longer an option.
Bodies of members of the Hassayna and Abu Sharia families, killed in an Israeli strike in 2023 and recently recovered from the rubble, are draped in Palestinian flags during their funeral in Gaza City, Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2026. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

VATICAN CITY (RNS) – Ten Catholic clergy from Africa, including Cardinal Stephen Brislin of South Africa, issued a statement Friday (Aug. 21) describing the Israeli government’s actions in Gaza as genocide, drawing on their continent’s experience of war and apartheid.

“We believe that the policies and actions of the Government of Israel in Gaza constitute genocide,” the statement read, citing arguments by international legal scholars and genocide experts. “Having learned to recognise dehumanisation in our own history, we cannot refuse to recognise it in another people.”

The statement was issued by Priests Against Genocide, a network of Catholic priests, bishops and cardinals advocating for Palestinian rights. The organization was founded in 2025 and says it represents over 2,500 members across 67 countries.

On Sunday, Pope Leo made an appeal for peace and called for a two-state solution that would respect the national integrity of Israel and Palestine. But the pontiff has stopped short of declaring Israeli actions in Gaza a genocide.

Brislin, among the signatories of the statement, is the Archbishop of Johannesburg in South Africa and was appointed last year by Pope Leo as a member of the Vatican department overseeing clergy. The pope also gave Breslin a prominent advisory role in the June consistory, a summit of cardinals.

Cardinal Stephen Brislin. (Photo courtesy of Archdiocese of Johannesburg)

South Africa — which enforced racial segregation and white minority rule, called apartheid, between 1948 and 1994 — has a long history of Palestinian advocacy. Nelson Mandela, the anti-apartheid leader who became the country’s first Black president, declared in 1997 that “our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”

In December 2023, South Africa brought a case before the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of violating the Genocide Convention in its war in Gaza. South Africa argued that Israel’s conduct unfolded “against a background of apartheid” and an “institutionalized regime of discriminatory laws, policies and practices” toward Palestinians. The case is still pending with the ICJ.

In their statement, the African clergy said they “cannot condemn apartheid in our history and refuse to recognise these patterns inflicted upon Palestinians.”

The statement, directly addressed to the government of Israel, also rejected “antisemitism and Islamophobia alike” and condemned the “grave crimes” committed by Hamas on Oct 7, 2023, that resulted in the death of about 1,200 people in Israel and the abduction of some 250 hostages.

“Their crimes do not diminish Israel’s obligations under international law, nor justify genocide or collective punishment. We will not answer one dehumanisation with another,” the statement added.

Israel has not issued a response to the clergy’s statement but has denied past genocide allegations, stating that its war is against Hamas and not Palestinians.

Israel launched its military offensive in Gaza after the Oct 7. attack. Since then, more than 73,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, according to the territory’s Health Ministry, including at least 21,000 children. A ceasefire took effect on October of last year, but Israeli strikes and gunfire have continued, killing more than 1,200 Palestinians since the agreement. Tensions have also intensified in the occupied West Bank as attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinians have increased.

Friday’s statement called for Israel to put an immediate end to “genocidal policies” and forced displacement and to cooperate with international judicial systems. The signatories also asked that Israel suspend weapons and technologies that risk violating international law. And they called on Christian groups to scrutinize their investments for ties to human rights violations. Finally, they demanded humanitarian, medical and trauma-healing support for those who were harmed in the conflict and called for the creation of a dignified and safe future for Palestinians and Israelis alike. 



The African clergy stated that their “continent knows war,” not only in its past, but also through the ongoing conflicts in Sudan and South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Sahel and northern Mozambique. They issued the same demands for peace and justice to African governments.

“A particularly horrifying feature of this genocide is that, for the overwhelming majority of Gaza’s population, there has been no reliable route to safe refuge — only repeated displacement within a closed territory, from one unsafe place to another,” the statement read. “To order people to flee when there is no safe place to flee to is not protection.”

The document drew from the sacred African tradition of Ubuntu, which emphasizes interconnectedness and shared responsibility, as well as sacred Scripture and Vatican pronouncements to make its case.

“Our answer cannot be silence. Our answer cannot be hatred. Our answer must be truth, justice, mercy — and a true peace which is never merely the absence of fighting,” the statement read.

Shaken Baby Syndrome Has Been Largely Debunked. Courts Are Still Catching Up.


Katie Smith, whose murder conviction was based on what’s increasingly seen as junk science, is fighting for her freedom.
Truthout/TheAppeal
August 22, 2026

mstroz via Getty Images

By the time Mason Tucker Smith was 2 years old, his mother, Mary Katherine Smith, had taken him to the doctor dozens of times.

Tucker had frequent ear infections, high fevers, and episodes of vomiting. On at least six occasions, he had seizures, but the doctors repeatedly reassured his mother, who goes by Katie, that these were benign “breath-holding spells” that would resolve on their own.

On the day of his collapse, July 30, 2014, Tucker had another seizure while Katie’s housemate, Jeremy Kitchens, was watching him in their bedroom and Katie was making dinner, according to her statement to the police.

As she approached the bedroom door, she heard a “thud.” Katie entered the room and Kitchens told her that Tucker was having another “episode.” Katie told police that she found Tucker unconscious on the ground. Believing that this was another breath-holding episode, she picked him up and put him on the bed. She left him in Kitchens’s care while she drove her daughter to meet a friend. While she was gone, Tucker vomited.

She returned to the house about 20 minutes later and checked Tucker’s oxygen level. When it began to drop, she called 911 and attempted to resuscitate him.

At the hospital, a physician concluded Tucker had been shaken. He was declared dead on August 2 and Katie was charged with his murder.

Two years later, Katie went to trial in Richmond County, Georgia, and was found guilty. The judge sentenced her to life in prison.

Shaken baby syndrome (SBS), also known as abusive head trauma (AHT), has been largely debunked, with one New Jersey judge calling it “akin to ‘junk science.’” While some courts have started to take a more critical look at SBS/AHT cases, prosecutions have continued and many people are still fighting their convictions.

The so-called triad of symptoms associated with SBS/AHT — bleeding around the eyes, bleeding between the skull and brain, and brain swelling — can be caused by strokes, short-distance falls, seizures, and disease, among other things.

Katie’s attorneys with the Southern Center for Human Rights say their investigation has revealed that she was convicted of a crime that never occurred.

Experts retained by her legal team — a neurologist and a forensic pathologist — have concluded that Tucker died of undiagnosed epilepsy, which was caused by an undetected arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in his brain. AVM is a life-threatening condition that typically develops in utero, in which a person has abnormally tangled blood vessels that disrupt blood flow, deprive tissue of oxygen, and face risk of rupture.

Forty-four people have been exonerated in SBS/AHT cases, according to the National Registry of Exonerations.

Katie’s attorneys have filed a motion for a new trial and, on August 24, they will present their new evidence before the Superior Court of Richmond County. The Augusta District Attorney’s Office is opposing Katie’s petition. The office did not respond to emails or calls seeking comment.

“Tucker’s death was a tragedy, not a crime,” Katie’s lawyers wrote in their motion. “Tucker was sick from birth, and was living with an undiagnosed and untreated deadly brain condition.”
Tucker’s Medical Records

Truthout reviewed Tucker’s medical records, which total about 278 pages. They reveal that Katie took him to the pediatrician more than 25 times, in addition to visits to specialists and the emergency room.

The physicians reassured Katie that Tucker was a healthy child. They told her that when he became upset he held his breath until he passed out, but that this was nothing to be concerned about.

Tucker’s first witnessed seizure occurred at daycare when he was five months old. Katie picked him up from daycare and took him to the pediatrician.

“Patient was reported to have had eyes roll back and lose consciousness while eating baby food in a highchair (sort of slumped),” the doctor wrote.

The pediatrician sent him to the hospital for an overnight observation. During the observation, Tucker “ate and slept well,” according to the medical records. Katie told the doctor that Tucker’s father, who had died shortly after Tucker’s death, and nephew each had experienced one seizure. The report does not recommend any further evaluation.

After his second seizure, which also occurred at daycare, his pediatrician referred him for an electroencephalogram (EEG), which measures electrical activity in the brain. The EEG report states that it was normal.

In her affidavit to the court, defense expert Heather Ravvin McKee, a neurologist who specializes in epilepsy, says research shows that “a single routine EEG only has an approximately 29-55 percent chance” of showing abnormal brain waves.

Despite the results of the EEG, Tucker should have been treated for epilepsy after the second seizure at the latest, she wrote.

Tucker had another seizure a few months later in March of 2013. Then, on July 20, 2013, when Tucker was 15 months old, he experienced a seizure that lasted between 15 and 20 minutes. He was still seizing when he and Katie arrived at the hospital, according to his medical records.

Notes from the hospital state that he “was bedridden” because he “could not rise from the bed without assistance, could not ambulate, and could not sit in a chair or wheelchair without support restraints.” Yet, he was discharged the next day. Katie was instructed to make a follow-up appointment with Tucker’s pediatrician.

Less than two weeks later, Katie took Tucker to see a pediatric neurologist. His report is riddled with errors. He wrote that Tucker was born full-term (he was premature) and that he had never been hospitalized, although he had been admitted to the neurologist’s own institution just 11 days earlier.

He diagnosed Tucker with breath-holding episodes and told Katie that Tucker would grow out of them. “I do not think these are seizures or epilepsy,” he wrote in his report.

On July 23, 2014, a week before Tucker’s final collapse, Katie and Tucker returned to the pediatrician. Tucker had been vomiting, was nauseous, and was experiencing headaches. The doctor told Katie to keep him hydrated. However, this may have been a sign that something more serious was at play. Vomiting can occur as part of a seizure, following a seizure, or can be a sign of increased pressure in the brain, according to neurologist McKee, the defense expert.
The Prosecution’s Case

Misogyny and junk science collided at Katie’s trial. Katie was a single parent working as a hospice nurse. Her husband, Tucker’s father, died by suicide when Tucker was just two months old. After his death, Katie and her children moved in with Kitchens, a friend from high school.

At trial, prosecutors portrayed Katie as an uncaring mother who neglected Tucker’s medical needs and prioritized her friendship with Kitchens over her children. Katie did not take the stand.

Vilifying mothers is a common prosecutorial tactic in cases where women are accused of crimes that likely never occurred, according to Valena Beety, author of Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity.

“The woman is wrongly convicted based on that confluence of [false] forensic evidence and gender bias,” Beety recently told The Appeal.

Katie and Tucker Smith on August 12, 2012.Provided by the Southern Center for Human Rights

Kitchens testified for the prosecution and relayed essentially the same account that Katie had provided to the police. The prosecutor asked Kitchens if he had not killed Tucker, who did? Kitchens replied, “I guess Katie did … She was the only other one there.” On cross-examination, the defense accused Kitchens of killing Tucker.

Emergency personnel testified that Katie was “unnaturally calm” when they arrived.

“We’ve had kids locked in cars on cool days and the parents were much more emotional about the situation than that day,” a sergeant with the fire department told the jury.

Prosecutors and police often make assumptions about how a person should respond to a crisis. Among wrongful convictions, there are numerous examples of law enforcement presuming that too much or too little emotion was indicative of an innocent person’s guilt.

Katie’s attorney, Mark Loudon-Brown, noted in a phone interview with Truthout that Katie was a nurse who is trained to remain calm in crises.

The centerpiece of the prosecution’s case was the testimony of two medical experts who told the jury that Tucker had been shaken.

Mary Lynn Sheram, the hospital physician who first diagnosed Tucker with SBS/AHT, testified that Tucker’s symptoms are “shown in the literature to be 100 percent as non-accidental trauma.” The bleeding around his eyes “makes it a hallmark for abusive head injury.”

Nearly identical statements have been made in numerous SBS/AHT cases that have resulted in exonerations.

Timothy Gonzalez was convicted in an SBS case in 2016, the same year as Katie’s conviction, and was exonerated earlier this year. At his trial, a child abuse pediatrician testified that there was no “accidental explanation” and no “medical explanation” for his daughter’s injuries. In 2022, the court tossed out his conviction. At his retrial earlier this year, his attorneys presented evidence that Gonzalez’s daughter had suffered from a respiratory infection that led to encephalitis, an inflammation of the brain, which then developed into sepsis. On March 11, the jury acquitted Gonzalez of all charges.

The second medical expert for the prosecution in Katie’s case was Lora Darrisaw, the director of pediatric forensic pathology at the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

“[W]e have no plausible accidental event that would account for the findings that I had,” she told the jury.

Several years before Katie’s trial, Darrisaw was the star witness in the murder trial of two Georgia parents, Ashley and Albert Debelbot, who were accused of killing their three-day-old newborn. She ruled the death a homicide by blunt force trauma. In 2021, the parents were exonerated after their attorneys uncovered evidence that their baby had been born with abnormalities in the brain which led to her death.
Openings for Exoneration

The medical community’s understanding of SBS/AHT has changed significantly in the years since Tucker’s death. Since 2014, 27 people convicted in SBS/AHT cases have been exonerated, according to the National Registry of Exonerations.

Last year, in a first-of-its-kind decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court banned testimony on SBS from the state’s courtrooms. In July, in another Georgia case, Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Kimberly A. Gallant granted Danyel Smith’s request for a new trial, noting SBS/AHT is no longer treated as a “presumptive diagnosis,” and that “current medical and scientific standards” require providers to consider “alternative, non-abusive causes before concluding abuse.” (Danyel is also represented by the Southern Center for Human Rights. He and Katie are not related.)

“Today, the diagnostic approach is different,” Katie’s attorney, Loudon-Brown, told Truthout. “You might keep the idea of non-accidental trauma in your head, but you would have to go further. You would have to look at what’s going on with Tucker.”


This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.

Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg
Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg is an independent journalist and founder of The Carceral Report. Follow her on Bluesky @elizabethweill.bsky.social and Instagram @elizabethweillgreenberg.
Trump deals deathblow to 100-year-old manufacturer


U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he speaks to the media before boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, U.S., en route to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, August 21, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci
August 25, 2026 
ALTERNET

A Connecticut manufacturing company that has operated for more than a century is finally closing its doors after being sent over the edge by President Donald Trump’s economic policies.

Its longtime owner cites “soaring business expenses and tariffs as key reasons for the decision,” reports NBC Connecticut.

“Leed-Himmel Industries, a custom aluminum manufacturing company based in Hamden, has been winding down operations after decades of serving customers,” NBC CT reports. “The closure did not come as a surprise to owner Howard Goldfarb.”

When NBC Connecticut visited the plant in 2024, Goldfarb was already warning reporters that rising expenses were biting an expanding hunk out of his business and putting pressure on it.

"It could get to the point where I just say, 'It's not worth doing anymore. All we're doing is working to pay the electrical bill,'" he told NBC Connecticut at the time.

Two years later, that prediction became reality, with Goldfarb declaring that costs had climbed too high as he walked through a largely empty factory floor.

"If our costs were where they were, say, eight years ago, I wouldn't have shut it down," Goldfarb told reporters.

Goldfarb’s factory was not only a stable source of jobs but also a considerable spring of revenue. The business paid about $160,000 annually in local property taxes. But Goldfarb said health insurance for workers kept rising, as did insurance for buildings, vehicles, and workers' compensation. The company's power bill topped $500,000 despite reduced operations.

But Goldfarb said the final blow came from the White House.

"Tariffs was the final nail in the coffin, if you will," he said, adding that tariffs increased the cost of aluminum and other materials while forcing him to tie up more cash in inventory purchases before customers paid their invoices.

The Supreme Court has already rejected Trump’s tariffs, calling them illegal because they lacked congressional authorization. But the president has continued to levy them despite not receiving legislative approval.

“President Trump’s repeated attempts to impose tariffs have become an encapsulation of his second term,” wrote the Times Editorial Board. “They have hurt the American economy and his own popularity. They also range from legally dubious to blatantly illegal.”

Goldfarb had almost managed to salvage some jobs by selling the company to a European buyer, but he said the buyer backed out after Trump unilaterally declared war on Iran. He said he is still trying to find a buyer for the Hamden facility and hopes it will remain a manufacturing site rather than being converted to storage space.
‘Settle It’: Trump Personally Intervened to Force DOJ Deal With Reviled Concert Ticket Monopoly

“The president stopped by to check on the negotiations. How is this not settled yet? asked Trump,” The Wall Street Journal reported. “By the end of the meeting, it was.”


US President Donald Trump uses a cellphone aboard Marine One before it departs Leesburg Executive Airport in Leesburg, Virginia on April 24, 2025.
(Photo by Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Reporting published over the weekend revealed that US President Donald Trump personally intervened to force a Justice Department settlement with Ticketmaster owner Live Nation, which faced a high-profile antitrust trial for abusing its market power and illegally crushing competition.

The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that the Justice Department, which sued Live Nation in 2024 during former President Joe Biden’s administration, was “preparing to wage a legal battle more than a decade in the making against the world’s largest concert promoter. Then President Trump called.” A senior DOJ official relayed to associates that the president told them to “settle it.”

Trump’s intervention reportedly came just days before the March 2 trial began in the antitrust case, the product of a yearslong investigation into the ticketing and concert behemoth. The Justice Department formally announced the settlement on March 9; the DOJ antitrust division’s counsel in the case appeared to be unaware of the deal until he appeared in court for trial.

According to the Journal, Trump’s instruction to the DOJ to settle the Live Nation case came shortly after the president met with the company’s CEO, Michael Rapino, in the Oval Office in late February.

“Trump had called the meeting to discuss how to improve bookings at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, according to people familiar with the conversation,” the Journal reported. “He also wanted to know why the company hadn’t reached a deal over its lawsuit.”

“On March 5, Rapino was back at the White House, meeting White House Counsel David Warrington and then-Attorney General Pam Bondi to put the finishing touches on a deal. He was accompanied by Sullivan & Cromwell’s James McDonald, who had little antitrust experience but had been representing Trump in two New York appeals,” the newspaper added. “The president stopped by to check on the negotiations. How is this not settled yet? asked Trump... By the end of the meeting, it was.”

Since the start of Trump’s second White House term, the Justice Department has repeatedly settled cases against corporations accused of violating the nation’s antitrust laws. MS NOW reported last month that “DOJ staff have privately complained that the Trump administration is essentially deciding not to enforce antitrust laws that are critical to keeping companies from becoming single-source providers and being able to charge enormous sums for their product or service.”

The Biden Justice Department’s 2024 antitrust suit against Live Nation accused the company of depriving music fans in the US of “ticketing innovation” and forcing them to “use outdated technology while paying more for tickets than fans in other countries.”

The Journal reported Sunday that most of the states that joined the antitrust action against Live Nation, “including those controlled by Republicans, viewed the settlement as so favorable to the company that they refused to join it and continued to trial.”

“In April, a jury found Live Nation illegally monopolized the ticketing market for major concerts in the US,” the Journal noted. “The plaintiff states have asked the judge to break up the company.”
GRIFT

Trump Raked In Up to $15.5 Million From Fossil Fuel Stocks as His War Pushed Up Gas Prices

“President Trump continues to get richer from an illegal war that he started and refuses to resolve, while Americans pay the price for his actions,” said US Sen. Maggie Hassan.


US President Donald Trump waves the green flag to start the race during the Freedom 250 Grand Prix Race on the streets of Washington, DC, on August 23, 2026.
(Photo by Doug Mills/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

A report released Monday by Democrats on the US Congressional Joint Economic Committee estimates that President Donald Trump has made millions of dollars from his own illegal war with Iran.

According to the report, Trump’s wealth has increased by as much as $15.5 million since January thanks to his investments in oil and gas stocks, which have surged since the president unlawfully attacked Iran without congressional approval earlier this year.

In examining the fossil fuels stocks owned by the president—including shares in Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum—the report finds that their value has increased by an average of 39% since the start of the year.

JEC’s analysis also notes that Trump bought an additional $3.6 million in oil and gas stocks in the first quarter of 2026, allowing him to further cash in on the war he started.

While the war has driven up the values of fossil fuel companies, it has also hit US consumers directly in their wallets by raising the price of oil, diesel fuel, and gasoline.

In total, the report estimates that “Americans have now spent an additional $71.5 billion on gas since the start of Trump’s Iran War, an average of $604 in added costs per family.”

Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), ranking member of the JEC, contrasted the president getting $15 million richer from his own war with Americans struggling to make ends meet.

“President Trump continues to get richer from an illegal war that he started and refuses to resolve, while Americans pay the price for his actions,” Hassan said. “On the campaign trail, Trump promised giveaways for Big Oil and relief for working families, but he can’t deliver both. Since launching his war with Iran, Trump has made clear that he puts his own financial interests—and those of his biggest bankrollers—ahead of Americans who are burdened with higher costs for gas and everyday essentials under this administration.”

During the 2024 presidential election, Trump repeatedly claimed that he would bring down costs for US consumers starting on the very first day of his presidency.

Prices have only continued to rise during his term, however, and the president has since dismissed concerns about affordability as a “hoax” concocted by the Democratic Party.
Nearly 100 Groups Urge Congress to Reject GOP-Led Attacks on Clean Air Protections

If lawmakers pass four Congressional Review Act resolutions, the coalition warns, “families will experience consequences,” from further strained household budgets to breathing toxic air.



A traffic jam occurs on Interstate 95 in Miami, Florida.
(Photo by Wikimedia Commons)

Jessica Corbett
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Dozens of organizations focused on consumer advocacy, the environment, health, science, and more came together on Monday for a letter urging the Republican-controlled US Congress to vote down four resolutions attacking clean air protections.

Signed by 95 groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, Earthjustice Action, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Progressives for Democracy in America, Public Citizen, and Sierra Club, the letter takes aim at four resolutions recently introduced by Republicans under the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

The CRA allows lawmakers to overturn rules and regulations issued by federal agencies—and has already been used by Big Oil-backed President Donald Trump and his allies in Congress to roll back policies aimed at limiting pollution.

After Trump returned to power last year, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transmitted to Congress three emission waivers that the Biden administration granted to California, which led to CRA resolutions that lawmakers passed and the president signed—measures condemned at the time as his “latest betrayal of democracy” and a gift to polluters.

This past June, the Trump EPA announced that it was submitting four more to Congress, resulting in new resolutions that, as the letter notes, “seek to overturn four long-standing Clean Air Act preemption waivers that states rely on to protect the health and safety of their residents (HJRes. 202/SJRes 206, HJRes. 205/SJRes. 207, HJRes. 211/SJRes. 208, HJRes. 214/SJRes. 205).”

As the letter details, these resolutions target waivers for:Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards for passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles that the auto industry has already been complying with since 2009;
Smog-forming pollutant and GHG emissions limits for light-duty vehicles that the auto industry has already been complying with since 2015 (Advanced Clean Cars I (ACC I) program);
The 2022 reinstatement of the 2013 ACC I waiver (after the EPA unlawfully purported to withdraw it in 2019); and
The Small Off-Road Engine (SORE) amendments, which set exhaust standards for garden equipment and other polluting small engines in California (and cannot be adopted by other states).

These waivers “are essential for saving families money and protecting air quality,” and “given the affordability crisis facing millions of people today, it would be a disastrous waste of time and resources to attempt to nullify” them, the letter argues. “Vehicles and off-road engines currently in use already meet the standards that Congress is attacking—and these standards mean that our cars, trucks, and off-road engines cost less at the gas pump and that our air is cleaner. There’s nothing to fix.”

While votes for the resolutions are not yet planned, the coalition warned that “if Congress attempts to improperly block the implementation of these long-established state standards, families will experience consequences,” from breathing toxic air to further straining household budgets as “gas prices are skyrocketing” thanks to Trump’s illegal war on Iran.

Already, “more than 152 million people live in counties with unhealthy levels of ozone or particulate pollution,” the groups noted, citing the American Lung Association (ALA). “Smogforming pollution from combustion cars, trucks, lawn mowers, and leaf blowers can worsen asthma, decrease lung function, and lead to premature death, particularly in children and the elderly.”

“Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from transportation is singlehandedly responsible for up to 20,000 premature deaths each year,” they continued. “All of these burdens disproportionately affect communities of color and low-income communities who are more likely to live near major trucking routes and transportation hubs.”

Pointing to the ALA’s 2025 and 2026 reports that “document a stark reversal forcing more people to live in counties graded ‘F’ for ozone pollution,” the letter stresses that “the waivers are more essential than ever. These improper CRA resolutions threaten the ability of states to take action to protect their residents from harmful air pollution and its negative public health impacts.”
Trump Envoy Tom Barrack in Hot Seat for Admitting Israeli Occupation of Golan Heights

Barrack’s comments—since retracted amid Republican calls for his resignation—directly contradicted the president’s recognition of Israel’s illegal occupation of Syrian territory conquered in 1967.



US Special Envoy Tom Barrack (left) speaks with Syrian Foreign Minister Assad al-Shaibani in Ankara, Türkiye on April 9, 2026.
(Photo by Tom Barrack/X)


Brett Wilkins
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Tom Barrack, the US ambassador to Türkiye and special presidential envoy for Syria and Iraq, on Sunday retracted his acknowledgment of Israel’s illegal occupation of Syria’s Golan Heights amid mounting Republican calls for his resignation.

Directly contradicting Trump’s formal recognition of Israel’s unlawful 1981 annexation of the Golan Heights, Barrack said during a Friday interview with podcaster Mario Nawfal that Israel would face difficulties if it moved to unlawfully annex parts of southern Lebanon it invaded and currently occupies.
nate Dem Says Huckabee Must Step Down for Groveling to Israeli Government

“In the Golan with Syria, they still occupy the Golan against the [United Nations] resolutions, against all of the international order, which has said the Golan is Syria’s,” Barrack noted. He also floated the possibility that last week’s Israeli strike on an air base in northwestern Syria may have been an attempt at “baiting” Türkiye.

Israel invaded and captured the strategically important Golan Heights during the Six-Day War in 1967, ethnically cleansing more than 100,000 Syrians and eventually annexing the conquered territory, a move unanimously rejected by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 497. Since then, tens of thousands of Israeli settlers have unlawfully colonized the Syrian territory.

UN Security Council Resolution 242 demands that Israel withdraw from the Golan Heights and all occupied Palestinian territories as well.

No country recognized Israel’s occupation of the Golan Heights until US President Donald Trump did so during his first term. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu showed his appreciation for the move by naming one of the dozens of illegal Jewish settlements in the territory Trump Heights.

Barrack subsequently reversed himself, telling The Associated Press on Sunday that “United States policy on the Golan was set by President Trump in 2019 and is unchanged.”

This, as Israeli leaders denounced Barrack’s remarks and Republican politicians and pundits called for his firing or resignation.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar said the ambassador’s comments were “full of inaccuracies” and “contradict the position of Trump himself regarding the Golan Heights.”

US Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said on X: “The Senate confirmed [Barrack] to enact the PRESIDENT’S AGENDA, which millions of Americans voted for. It seems the ambassador forgot that or failed to do his research, so here’s a refresher for him… President Trump has been CLEAR about Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights for years!”

Far-right provocateur and Trump confidant Laura Loomer called Barrack “absolutely brain dead.”

“Tom Barrack is hands down the most retarded ambassador nominated by President Trump,” she contended. “He should resign for his lack of understanding of US foreign policy.”

Meanwhile, some experts positively noted Barrack’s short-lived acknowledgment of what the international community has long maintained.




“[Barrack] said the Golan is occupied Syrian land under UN resolutions. That is simply what the UN says. It has said it since 1967. Most of the world agrees,” political analyst Michael Arizanti said on X.

“Israel’s foreign minister said his remarks were full of inaccuracies,” he continued. “Professional lunatic Laura Loomer demanded he resign and claimed he was compromised by Arab money, with no evidence at all! Sen. Rick Scott told him to do his research. And because Barrack had criticized Israel’s strike on a Syrian air base the week before, he was accused of siding with the bad guys.”

“Four attacks,” Arizanti added. “Not one about the actual policy!”
Legendary TV Comedy Writer Explains ‘Existential’ Threat of Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger

“We know what this merger will mean—one less buyer for our work, less demand for writing services, less leverage to negotiate deal terms that recognize our value, less creative latitude.”



An aerial view of the Paramount logo on the water tower at Paramount Studios on February 23, 2026 in Los Angeles, California.
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)


Brad Reed
Aug 24, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


Top TV comedy writer Michael Schur, co-creator of hit shows such as Parks and Rec and The Good Place, is sounding the alarm about the “existential” dangers of allowing the proposed $110 billion megamerger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery to go through.

In an op-ed published Monday in The Hollywood Reporter, Schur outlined the downsides of megamergers between major Hollywood studios, which he described as “bad for everyone except those at the very top” and “another potential broadsword blow to an already wounded industry, one that’s been gouged and squeezed and strangled by high-level corporate greed.”

Focusing on the challenges faced by writers, Schur wrote that people in his profession “felt the walls closing in” when they first heard news of Paramount’s proposed purchase of Warner Bros.

“We know what this merger will mean,” wrote Schur, “one less buyer for our work, less demand for writing services, less leverage to negotiate deal terms that recognize our value, less creative latitude... The impact will be concrete, measurable, and serious.”

Schur explained that writers and other workers in the entertainment industry personally understand how corporate consolidation affects their livelihoods.

“We don’t have to theorize any of these outcomes,” Schur wrote. “Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox in 2019 put them all on full display. After the merger, Fox’s television development operation was folded into Disney’s. Their studio’s priorities continued, Fox’s did not. Writers who had built relationships at Fox found themselves adrift... More than 4,000 Fox employees lost their jobs.”

Schur concluded by encouraging opponents to the merger to “fight tooth and nail to sustain what is left of our struggling—but still breathing—creative industry” before it gets fully monopolized.

The combination of Paramount and Warner Bros. has long been controversial because it would put control of CBS, CNN, HBO, TikTok, and other major media properties all under the control of David Ellison, the son of billionaire Larry Ellison, a major donor to President Donald Trump.

The merger has been placed on hold amid multiple lawsuits seeking to block it, including one filed by 12 Democratic state attorneys general.

The New York Times reported on Monday that California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose office has been leading the state AGs’ antitrust complaint against the deal, called off a meeting that had been scheduled with Paramount executives to discuss a potential settlement.

In a statement, Bonta accused Paramount of leaking misleading information about settlement discussions between the parties, which he said demonstrated “a lack of good faith.”

“As soon as Paramount stops playing games and engages sincerely,” Bonta said, “my office is happy to meet again.”