Monday, May 26, 2025

 

Industry Seeks Sweeter Terms to Develop Offshore Wind in Japan

Offshore wind industry representatives are seeking better auction and fiscal terms from the Japanese government to help companies develop the wind industry potential offshore Japan, industry sources have told Reuters

Japan has a plan to have offshore wind projects with a total capacity of 10 GW developed by 2030 and 30 GW-45 GW by 2040. The country has held three auctions to award capacity so far, but major developers have been reviewing their options in Japan amid headwinds in the sector globally with surging costs and supply-chain delays. 

The Japanese government is considering extending the duration of the projects to 40 years from 30 years now, and allowing non-Japanese vessels to operate in offshore wind areas, according to multiple industry sources who spoke to Reuters.  

The industry also seeks capacity auctions for multi-year power contracts, and fiscal relief in the form of either subsidies or tax relief for the large industrial users to encourage them to sign long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) with wind project developers.  

The offshore wind industry has already backed off previously ambitious plans in Japan. 

Earlier this year, Mitsubishi Corporation said it is reviewing its business plans for Japanese offshore wind power generation projects “due to material changes in the macroeconomic environment.” 

In December 2021, Mitsubishi won in a Japanese auction projects in three Japanese sea areas. 

“However, in the wake of the pandemic and the Ukraine crisis, the business environment for offshore wind power has significantly changed and is continuing to change worldwide due to factors such as inflation, the depreciation of the yen, tight supply chains, and rising interest rates,” the Japanese corporation said in February 2025. 

Orsted, the world’s biggest offshore wind project developer, said last year it was “deprioritising development activities in Japan.” 

Earlier this month, Orsted warned of a continued challenging environment for the industry with mounting near-term headwinds globally. 

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

 

Indonesia’s State Oil Firm Considers Importing U.S. Fuel

Pertamina, the state oil and gas firm of Indonesia, is considering importing oil products from the United States amid the trade and tariff negotiations, Argus reported on Monday.

Indonesia seeks to show the United States that it is working to reduce its trade surplus with America and pledges to buy more U.S. products, especially energy, to reduce its trade surplus.

Last week, Indonesia’s Energy Minister Bahlil Lahadalia urged Pertamina to import American fuel regardless of the logistical challenges, Jakarta Globe reported.

“There is no excuse [to not import from the US]. We have already imported liquefied petroleum gas [LPG] from the US,” Lahadalia was quoted as saying.

Fuel imports from the U.S. would take about 40 days for a cargo to arrive in Indonesia, compared to a week or two for imports from Asia and the Middle East.

However, Indonesian authorities appear intent to avoid the steep ‘reciprocal’ U.S. tariff – currently suspended – which President Donald Trump slapped on Asian countries in early April.

Earlier this month, Lahadalia said that Indonesia plans to slash its fuel imports from Singapore and source more refined products from the United States as the country looks to negotiate lower tariffs with the U.S.

Indonesia was slapped with one of the highest tariffs - 32% - in the “liberation day” tariffs announced by President Trump. These tariffs have been suspended until early July, during which time the Trump Administration expects most countries to come pleading their cases and promising to boost their imports of U.S. goods to avoid high tariffs.

“It is not only a matter of price but also geopolitical issues, we need to have a balance with other countries,” Lahadalia said earlier in May.

In April, the minister said that Indonesia, which is Southeast Asia’s biggest economy, would offer to buy an additional $10 billion worth of American oil and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

 

Global LNG Demand Faces "Deep Uncertainty", GIIGNL Says

The trajectory of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand is now marked by “deep uncertainty,” according to the president of the International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers (GIIGNL), signaling a more cautious tone from one of the industry’s most influential voices.

Speaking at an industry event in Paris, GIIGNL President Anne-Sophie Corbeau noted that although long-term fundamentals remain strong, short- to medium-term demand projections are increasingly difficult to pin down due to volatile pricing, geopolitical fragmentation, and uneven economic recoveries in key Asian markets. GIIGNL’s annual report, also released today, underscores that while global LNG imports reached 405 million tonnes in 2024 — up from 401 million in 2023 — growth is slowing, and regional dynamics are diverging.

This comes as the U.S. Department of Energy last week officially resumed approvals for LNG export permits, ending a politically charged freeze that had stalled billions in Gulf Coast investments. The Biden administration’s earlier pause had rattled developers, but U.S. LNG still remains a dominant force, accounting for nearly 30% of global supply in 2024.

Despite recent trade friction, including Chinese tariffs on U.S. LNG, American exporters have maintained a strong position in the global market. Flexible contracting models, competitive pricing, and access to Asian and European terminals have helped U.S. LNG continue expanding even in the face of regulatory uncertainty and shifting geopolitics.

Europe’s imports dipped slightly in early 2025, while demand from China and South Asia showed only modest recovery, held back by price sensitivity and stronger domestic gas output in some markets. Meanwhile, new regasification capacity in Germany and India may support late-year growth, but analysts warn that without clearer long-term policy signals, buyers remain cautious.

Trading desks are now watching how flexible contracts and spot-market exposure will shape flows into 2026, particularly as Qatar, the U.S., and Australia expand capacity amid increasingly competitive global pricing. No major FID announcements were made in the wake of GIIGNL’s report.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com


More Top Reads From Oilprice.com

 YANKEE IMPERIALISM


Iraq Files Lawsuit Against U.S. Over Kurdistan Oil Contracts

  • According to Iraqi media, the lawsuit was filed on Monday and accuses the U.S. government of allowing companies under its jurisdiction to sign oil exploration and production deals directly with the KRG.

  • The legal move comes just days after the Iraqi Ministry of Oil issued a sharp public statement warning that any foreign company operating independently in Kurdistan without federal approval is in breach of Iraqi law.

  • U.S. energy firms have long viewed Kurdistan as an attractive investment zone due to favorable contract terms, security arrangements, and expedited approvals compared to the more bureaucratic and volatile central government.

Iraq has filed a lawsuit against the United States over oil contracts between American companies and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in northern Iraq, escalating a constitutional dispute that has long threatened to destabilize the country’s energy sector, Reuters reported. 

According to Iraqi media, the lawsuit was filed on Monday and accuses the U.S. government of allowing companies under its jurisdiction to sign oil exploration and production deals directly with the KRG. Baghdad argues these deals bypass the federal oil ministry and violate Iraq’s constitution, which states that oil is a national resource controlled by the central government.

The legal move comes just days after the Iraqi Ministry of Oil issued a sharp public statement warning that any foreign company operating independently in Kurdistan without federal approval is in breach of Iraqi law. The ministry specifically criticized U.S.-based firms, stating that Washington’s inaction on the matter constitutes tacit approval of unauthorized oil development in the region.

This legal escalation builds on a 2022 ruling by Iraq’s Federal Supreme Court that deemed Kurdish oil contracts illegal and demanded all crude sales and licensing agreements go through Baghdad. However, enforcement has been sporadic, and international companies have continued to operate in Kurdistan under contracts signed directly with the regional government.

U.S. energy firms have long viewed Kurdistan as an attractive investment zone due to favorable contract terms, security arrangements, and expedited approvals compared to the more bureaucratic and volatile central government. Despite Baghdad’s opposition, several of these firms have maintained operations in the north, shipping crude through Turkey and beyond Iraq’s federal export system.

There has been no immediate comment from the U.S. State Department or Department of Energy on the lawsuit or its potential diplomatic implications.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

The Permian Is Not Done Yet

  • The Permian Basin now produces over 6 million bpd, with Wood Mackenzie projecting a peak of 7.7 million bpd by 2035.

  • Industry consolidation favors major players like Exxon and Chevron, who maintain performance and cost efficiency.

  • With shale growth slowing, energy majors are eyeing new basins like Argentina’s Vaca Muerta and Canada’s Montney.

Back in 2017, oil production in the Permian stood at 2.2 million barrels daily. Today, the Permian is producing over 6 million barrels daily, accounting for nearly half of the U.S. total. Predictions of a looming peak have lately multiplied, but according to Wood Mackenzie, the Permian is not done yet—not if prices improve.

To be sure, the boom days seem to be over. Production growth in the most prolific shale play in the United States has been slowing already as production costs climb higher while oil prices slide lower. Most forecasts for the region agree that growth in production is about to slow down further, and Wood Mac is no exception. The consultancy expects output there to add 200,000 barrels daily this year, for a total of 6.6 million barrels daily.

Going forward, growth is about to continue slowing, the analysts predicted, until production peaks at 7.7 million barrels daily in 2035. Yet, while many assume that a peak is inevitably followed by a decline, this will not be the case in the Permian. Output of crude oil in the play will plateau at 7.7 million bpd, and this will more than offset production declines in other producing regions in the country—meaning oil demand will be healthy enough to support such a trend.

Companies with big footprints in the Permian, therefore, can enjoy said footprint even with slower growth. Yet companies tend to seek new growth opportunities all the time to sustain their business, and the prospect of peak growth in the Permian is a real one. The gas-to-oil ratio of output there has been on the rise, as has the water-to-oil ratio in the play. Both trends suggest that some formations in the basin are reaching geological constraints, and more drilling isn’t necessarily proportionate to the oil volumes produced.

Indeed, Big Oil executives have predicted that peak oil supply will arrive in the U.S. before 2035. This does not, of course, mean they are right and Wood Mac analysts are wrong. It simply means that nothing is certain until it happens. And it seems that the slowdown in the Permian is already happening. It also seems that the challenges are multiplying: the latest is concern that toxic wastewater in underground reservoirs could leak and that it could affect seismic activity in the area. In response to these risks, the Railroad Commission of Texas has started imposing restrictions on the amount of wastewater disposed of underground until pressure levels subside.

This will naturally affect drilling, contributing to the overall production growth slowdown. This raises the question of what’s next for the big operators in the top shale play in North America. As Wood Mac’s analysts point out in their report, “The prospect of substantial production growth and low-cost barrels has been a magnet for the US industry for more than a decade. Organic investment complemented by M&A and consolidation have made the Permian a huge store of future value.”

Indeed, the consultancy estimates that 18 companies in the Permian have combined holdings worth over half a trillion dollars in net present value. Of these 18, a handful are the really big players, including Exxon, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, Diamondback Energy, and EOG. As the biggest players in the Permian, these are the companies most exposed to the ups that the future has in store for the Permian—but not the downs. Per Wood Mac, “The ‘haves’ continue to drive down costs and improve performance trends through scale, repetition and value chain integration.” The smaller players, or the “have-nots”, as Wood Mac calls them, are not doing so well. In fact, many are already having trouble with well performance and rising production prices.

The consultancy’s observations confirm what has already emerged as a clear trend in the Permian: consolidation is shrinking the number of industry players active in the area and now natural processes such as well depletion will reinforce the shrinking. In other words, production in the Permian will be under the control of a lot fewer companies in the future than now. That handful will probably be the ones bringing the Permian’s total output to its predicted peak of 7.7 million barrels daily—before they start diversifying away from it.

Diversification is the path that Wood Mac—as well as most other forecasters—see for the energy industry going forward. As it becomes indisputably clear that oil demand is not going anywhere, those in the business of satisfying that demand are going to find other sources of oil as the current ones get exhausted. For those partial to shale, it’s the Vaca Muerta in Argentina or the Montney shale in Canada. For conventional development, options abound, from the Middle East to Africa and new frontier regions. According to Wood Mac, few of these can compare with the Permian in terms of value proposition. According to real life, the world needs oil and will get it from wherever it can—and Big Oil is well aware of this.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

U.S. Offshore Oil Production Set To Jump

  • EIA and BOEM: Gulf of Mexico’s output is projected to rise from 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) to 2.4 million bpd by 2027.

  • Recent BOEM assessments estimate the Gulf holds 29.59 billion barrels of oil and 54.84 trillion cubic feet of gas in technically recoverable.

  • Analysts note that despite trade disputes and policy shifts, U.S. offshore oil remains globally competitive.

U.S. energy executives are forecasting a significant increase in offshore oil production under a potential second Trump administration, attributing this to streamlined permitting processes, sustained investments, and technological advancements. The Gulf of Mexico’s output is projected to rise from 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) to 2.4 million bpd by 2027, according to estimates from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).

While shale oil offers flexibility, its growth is expected to plateau, prompting companies to focus more on offshore drilling. The Trump administration's commitment to expediting oil and gas project approvals on federal lands is anticipated to further bolster offshore activities.

BOEM currently manages 2,227 active leases on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS), with 469 leases producing as of 2024. In 2023, OCS leases generated over $7 billion in federal revenue and accounted for approximately 14% of total U.S. crude production.

Recent BOEM assessments estimate the Gulf holds 29.59 billion barrels of oil and 54.84 trillion cubic feet of gas in technically recoverable, undiscovered fields. A 2023 update added 1.3 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe), marking a 22.6% increase after analyzing more than 37,000 reservoirs across 1,336 fields.

In addition to promising geology, deepwater drilling is benefiting from technological advances. Chevron's Anchor project, for example, recently began production at record-breaking pressures of 20,000 psi—a first for the industry and a milestone in deepwater engineering.

At the same time, energy companies are deploying AI-driven tools to reduce risk, increase productivity, and optimize maintenance. Companies like BP and Devon Energy are using artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, real-time drilling performance, reservoir analysis, and cost forecasting—giving them a competitive edge in volatile price environments.

Despite the appeal of offshore growth, the shift also reflects emerging challenges onshore. The U.S. oil and gas rig count has fallen to its lowest level since November 2021. In the Permian Basin, rig activity is down 11% year-over-year, and fracking activity is showing similar declines. This retreat has forced a strategic recalibration for many operators.

Diamondback Energy recently lowered its 2025 capital budget by $400 million, now forecasting $3.4–$3.8 billion in spending. The company also announced it would drop three rigs and one full-time completion crew, revising its full-year production guidance to 857,000–900,000 boe/day, down from an earlier 883,000–909,000 boe/day.

Other players, including ConocoPhillips, are also trimming capital expenditure and scaling back completion activity, citing low oil prices and margin pressures.

Meanwhile, global market dynamics may complicate the U.S. supply picture. OPEC+ is considering a 411,000 bpd production increase in July, with Saudi Arabia reportedly backing the move to counterbalance repeated quota violations by members such as Kazakhstan. A production hike could suppress oil prices further if global demand fails to keep pace.

Still, offshore U.S. production could fill key gaps left by a slowing shale sector. In 2024, federal offshore areas produced 668 million barrels of oil and 700 billion cubic feet of natural gas—figures that are expected to climb as new projects come online and lease activity increases.

Analysts note that despite trade disputes and policy shifts, U.S. offshore oil remains globally competitive. Its high-volume, low-decline profile offers a degree of reliability that investors and buyers increasingly value. Even in the face of Chinese tariffs on U.S. LNG, American energy exports continue to expand.

Ultimately, the outlook for U.S. oil production—onshore and offshore—will depend on a combination of market prices, regulatory conditions, and geopolitical risk. But for now, the message from the Gulf is clear: offshore is no longer a sideshow. It’s where the next wave of U.S. oil growth may be anchored.

Diamondback Energy recently lowered its 2025 capital budget by $400 million, now forecasting $3.4–$3.8 billion in spending. The company also announced it would drop three rigs and one full-time completion crew, revising its full-year production guidance to 857,000–900,000 boe/day, down from an earlier 883,000–909,000 boe/day

Other players, including ConocoPhillips, are also trimming capital expenditure and scaling back completion activity, citing low oil prices and margin pressures.

Meanwhile, global market dynamics may complicate the U.S. supply picture. OPEC+ is considering a 411,000 bpd production increase in July, with Saudi Arabia reportedly backing the move to counterbalance repeated quota violations by members such as Kazakhstan. A production hike could suppress oil prices further if global demand fails to keep pace.

Still, offshore U.S. production could fill key gaps left by a slowing shale sector. In 2024, federal offshore areas produced 668 million barrels of oil and 700 billion cubic feet of natural gas, and those figures are expected to climb as new projects come online and lease activity increases.

Analysts note that despite trade disputes and policy shifts, U.S. offshore oil remains globally competitive. Its high-volume, low-decline profile offers a degree of reliability that investors and buyers increasingly value. Even in the face of Chinese tariffs on U.S. LNG, American energy exports continue to expand.

Ultimately, the outlook for U.S. oil production (both onshore and offshore) will depend on a combination of market prices, regulatory conditions, and geopolitical risk. But for now, the message from the Gulf is clear: offshore oil has long ceased to be a sideshow. It’s where the next wave of U.S. oil growth is likely to come from. 

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

 

Trump Wants Pipelines, But Midstream Firms Aren’t Biting

  • U.S. midstream firms are hesitant to launch new greenfield pipeline projects due to oil price volatility and tariff uncertainty.

  • Companies like ArcLight and DT Midstream are prioritizing asset purchases over new builds.

  • Midstream firms are awaiting clearer demand signals from shale basins like the Permian and Haynesville.

U.S. midstream companies are hesitant to commit to new pipeline builds amid market volatility and tariff uncertainty.

Some companies are announcing new projects, especially those bringing natural gas to power data centers, but the industry is generally in a wait-and-see mode regarding greenfield projects despite the Trump Administration’s regulatory push to accelerate energy infrastructure expansion.

Firms have announced in recent months new pipeline projects, but many others have preferred to buy operating assets in deals with competitors or with private equity companies to expand their pipeline infrastructure.

Due to the high market volatility so far this year, the U.S. midstream operators are more cautious about plans for the future despite the friendliest regulatory environment they have had for five years, or ever.

“We have spent a lot of time thinking about the buy versus build question and, at this time, we're seeing more opportunities to buy assets,” Angelo Acconcia, a partner at energy infrastructure investor ArcLight Capital Partners, told Reuters.

While some midstream operators have announced new projects in recent months, others are waiting to see how the market volatility and demand uncertainty will affect upstream companies in the major U.S. shale basins.

So far this year, indications are that oil and gas producers are scaling back drilling activity with prices at or below breakevens for putting in line a new well. Slow growth in Permian oil output would also mean a smaller increase in associated gas production and the need to take these volumes to markets.

Energy Transfer LP reached a positive final investment decision (FID) in December for the construction of the intrastate Hugh Brinson Pipeline natural gas pipeline connecting Permian Basin production to premier markets and trading hubs. Phase I of the project – whose Phase I and II are expected to cost $2.7 billion in total – is expected to be in service by the end of 2026.

Energy Transfer has secured the majority of the pipeline steel, which is currently being rolled in U. S. pipe mills, co-chief executive officer Thomas Long said on the Q1 earnings call earlier this month.

And as a result, the company does not not expect any material impacts to the cost of the Hugh Brinson Pipeline project from tariff announcements, Long added.

There is a slowdown in drilling, Energy Transfer’s co-CEO Mackie McCrea said at the call, but noted that “if there’s areas where drilling has slowed down, will slow down some parts of that.” The company remains bullish on the future, “especially around NGLs and natural gas transportation,” McCrea said.

DT Midstream, which late last year announced a $1.2-billion acquisition of Midwest FERC-regulated natural gas pipelines from ONEOK, is waiting to see how the price volatility would affect operators in the key shale basins.

“There is growing political and regulatory support emerging for natural gas and energy infrastructure,” DT Midstream’s chief executive David Slater told analysts at the Q1 earnings call, adding that “overall, the fundamentals supporting the need for more natural gas infrastructure remain intact.”

But there is a feeling that upstream operators in the Haynesville basin are “putting their foot back on the gas,” Slater noted.

“So I think we just need to let the clock run here a little bit to see how the basin responds,” the executive added.

All midstream companies welcomed the Trump Administration’s efforts to ease the construction of energy infrastructure and are bullish on the long-term prospects of natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs).

But the growing uncertainty about prices and supply chain costs is deterring the midstream industry from committing to new large-size pipeline infrastructure in the shale basins, which are currently seeing a slowdown in drilling activity.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com