Monday, August 17, 2026

 

PSU to lead national AI effort to make geothermal power cheaper



Portland State leading team from Stanford, the U.S. Geological Survey and 400C Energy in one of the first projects chosen for the Department of Energy's Genesis Mission





Portland State University

ARID algorithm map of Great Basin 

image: 

Example sorting of the Great Basin into regions that are geologically similar using the ARID algorithm. AI models trained within regions may have lower uncertainty in temperature predictions, leading to a clearer understanding of the cost to develop geothermal energy.

view more 

Credit: Courtesy of John Lipor | Portland State University




Portland State University has been selected to lead a national research team that will use artificial intelligence to lower the cost of finding geothermal energy. The project, supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, is one of the first chosen under DOE's Genesis Mission.

The project is called ARISE, for AI Regionalization and Informed Siting for Enhanced Geothermal Systems. It places Portland State at the center of a national collaboration that includes Stanford University, the U.S. Geological Survey and 400C Energy, a geothermal exploration and development company. The team spans machine learning, geoscience, energy economics, a federal science agency and a startup, and the work requires all of them at once.

Geothermal power uses heat from deep underground to make electricity. It runs around the clock in any weather, which is what the grid needs as demand climbs. The obstacle is knowing how hot it is down there before committing. Temperature miles underground cannot be measured without drilling, and drilling is expensive. Companies make multimillion-dollar decisions based on predictions, and the deeper the target, the less accurate the prediction gets. That uncertainty is one of the main reasons geothermal energy has not grown faster.

“You're making a costly bet on how hot it is,” said John Lipor, Wedge Vision Associate Professor of electrical and computer engineering at PSU, who leads the project. “We use AI and years of historical data to make that bet less of a gamble.”

How It Works

The team is combining three tools its members have already built. A Stanford model predicts underground temperature across the country. A second Stanford model turns a range of possible temperatures into a range of possible electricity prices, so uncertainty shows up in dollars instead of degrees. PSU's contribution is an algorithm called ARID, which sorts the country into zones that are geologically similar.

That sorting step matters more than it sounds. One model trained on the whole country has to describe the Nevada desert and the Appalachian foothills at the same time, and ends up imprecise about both. Give each zone its own model, and each one only has to be right about one kind of place. The team then adds a final step that recommends which measurement to take next, and where, to shrink the cost range the most.

“Deciding where to make valuable new measurements has always relied heavily on expert judgment,” said Erick Burns, a research hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey who has co-led the USGS geothermal machine learning team with Lipor since 2021. “What is new here is a way to test whether machine learning can improve data collection strategies while optimizing both information content and cost savings.”

Among the project's deliverables is a new underground temperature map for Oregon. The team also plans to release its models, data and code publicly through DOE's Geothermal Data Repository, so other researchers and companies can use them.

The nine-month first phase has a specific target: narrow the range on those cost estimates by at least 10 percent on average compared with the method used now. The team will test the system against real measurement records from the DOE-funded Utah FORGE research site, replaying the site's history and comparing what the AI would have recommended with what the engineers there actually chose to do.

Why It Matters

Electricity demand from data centers worldwide is projected to more than double by 2030, with U.S. data centers alone consuming up to 12 percent of national demand. Geothermal is one of the few carbon-free sources that can run continuously to meet that kind of load. DOE analysis projects that enhanced geothermal systems could grow geothermal capacity from close to 4 gigawatts today to between 90 and 300 gigawatts by 2050, but only if exploration costs come down. That is the bottleneck ARISE is aimed at.

“Geothermal has enormous potential, but the cost of finding out what is underground has held it back,” said Roland Horne, professor of energy science and engineering at Stanford University and director of the Stanford Geothermal Program. “We're looking forward to taking the next step to making geothermal energy more widely available.”

The project reflects PSU's focus on public impact research. The algorithm PSU contributes to the pipeline grew out of a master's thesis by graduate student Joshua Sills, who continues on the project.

What's Next

If the first phase meets its targets, the team plans to build the work into a tool developers could use to plan a full exploration campaign, and to extend testing to other regions, including the Newberry volcanic area in central Oregon.

About the Genesis Mission

The Genesis Mission is a historic national initiative led by the U.S. Department of Energy, which is building the world's most powerful integrated science discovery platform. By uniting government, industry, academia, and philanthropy, it is accelerating breakthroughs in energy, scientific discovery, and national security through a new platform that combines AI, supercomputing, quantum systems, and advanced scientific instruments.

About the Awards

The goal of the Phase I RFA awards is to identify promising pathways toward transformative scientific capabilities and establish a foundation for future investment and scale. Project teams will design and demonstrate research workflows that integrate AI with scientific investigation, while rigorously evaluating whether those approaches can accelerate discovery, improve predictive capabilities, enhance experimentation, or generate new scientific insights.

Attribution

ARISE was selected under DOE Request for Application DE-FOA-0003612, Focus Area 17C, and is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. Portland State University is the lead institution. Collaborating organizations are Stanford University, the U.S. Geological Survey and 400C Energy.

About Portland State University

Portland State University is Oregon’s Urban Research University, located in the heart of downtown Portland. Guided by its mission to “let knowledge serve the city,” PSU combines world-class research, hands-on learning, and deep community partnerships to turn ideas into action — in the Pacific Northwest and around the world. Learn more at pdx.edu.

 

Machine learning smooths the road from idea to real-world climate impact



Research outlines a new workflow for design and manufacturing, illustrated by two new methane-fighting materials



University of Chicago

Andrea Daru UChicago PME 

image: 

University of Chicago postdoctoral scholar Andrea Darù is the first author of a paper describing an end-to-end, machine-learning-guided workflow that smooths the often-bumpy path new materials face when going from academic idea to manufacture-ready reality.

view more 

Credit: UChicago Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering





Developing new materials to tackle pressing global issues is a gap-filled process that can leave potential climate solutions lost in unread academic papers and forgotten dissertations.

A new, end-to-end, machine-learning-guided workflow created in the lab of UChicago Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering and Department of Chemistry Prof. Laura Gagliardi is helping smooth the path from academic idea to manufacture-ready reality in a single discovery process.

Through the Center for Advanced Materials for Environmental Solutions (CAMES), which Gagliardi co-directs, the lab used this new process to create two new high-performing materials for separating methane from nitrogen. These new zinc-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), UCHI-1 and UCHI-2 (named for the University of Chicago but pronounced “you-key” one and two) provide state-of-the-art gas adsorption and separation, but through a smoother, more efficient, less costly path from design to debut. 

The work was recently published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

The Gagliardi Group collaborated with UChicago Chemistry Department Prof. John Anderson and Anderson Lab postdoctoral scholar Jianheng (Allen) Ling to synthesize the two new materials envisioned through this process. This experimental work is fundamental to closing the loop with computational predictions and, most importantly, to creating the materials that can be tested for potential industrial applications.

“The end-to-end framework we created connects data mining, machine-learning predictions, materials design, synthesis, and experimental validation in a single discovery cycle,” Gagliardi said. “This helps overcome a major barrier in computational materials discovery: Many theoretically promising materials are never synthesized, while experimental development traditionally relies on slow and costly trial and error.”

Although MOFs are also proving to be powerful tools for fighting airborne carbon dioxide, the team chose to focus on a less-studied greenhouse gas – methane. Methane from agriculture, especially livestock, as well as landfills, coal mining, oil and natural gas operations stays in the atmosphere for about a decade, compared with the thousands of years CO2 can linger. But during that time, it does massive damage.

Over a 20-year time scale, methane has a climate impact 80 times greater than CO2.

“Methane as a greenhouse gas is more potent than CO2, but it has not been considered as much because it stays in the atmosphere a shorter time than CO2,” said Gagliardi Group postdoctoral researcher Andrea Darù, the paper’s first author. “Improving how we capture methane will also benefit industry and jobs. Industry leaks methane at a loss of about $10 billion per year through pipes, through compression machines, through anything related to methane gas for distribution.”

Filling the gaps

In the traditional process for designing and building new materials, computational groups devise and describe potentially interesting molecular designs. An experimental group must then pick up the work, create the materials and test them. Industry must ultimately incorporate the material into a product – the final step in bringing an academic idea into the real world.

Many promising materials are lost or forgotten along the way. 

“In computational groups, predicting and generating structures generally ends in a set of files, which experimental groups might later pick up and take forward to synthesis,” Darù said. “Other groups working in MOFs are often experimentalists. They base their research on previous chemical knowledge, improving designs through trial and error while using computation in a lighter way than what we use. Our new end-to-end framework is meant to connect the two sides.”

In the best cases, computationalists, experimentalists and industry collaborate to move research from idea to product, he added. In other cases, potentially valuable discoveries may never move beyond the academic research stage.

To create UCHI-1 and UCHI-2, the team trained an AI on datasets from academic literature, honing and iterating the design. They worked in collaboration with experimentalists and industry, rather than handing off the work once done. With an eye toward real-world considerations, the researchers worked in zinc, a material less expensive than the nickel or copper often used for methane-capture MOFs.

“We could obtain slightly methane-nitrogen separation than what is already in the literature, but at a lower cost,” Darù said.

The result was a single workflow that created two manufacture-ready MOFs for fighting methane pollution. UCHI-1 and UCHI-2 serve as proof of concept for the process – the team hopes to build new materials that perform better than the current state of the art as they improve their end-to-end workflow.

“Ultimately, we want to have a material that works,” Darù said. “We don’t only want to always stop with the academic research side of discovery. This starts with research in our labs but connects directly to industry.”

This work was made possible by the collaborative framework of the University of Chicago Institute for Climate and Sustainable Growth and by the close partnership among researchers at UChicago, Argonne National Laboratory, and Northwestern University, Gagliardi said.

“By finding a new, replicable route around the bottlenecks and gaps that keep important new materials from mass production, this project exemplifies the central vision of CAMES,” said CAMES Co-Director Doug Weinberg. “We want breakthrough science to move beyond the lab and into the world, where it can improve lives.”

 

From Google to ChatGPT: Students are changing how they search for knowledge



Bar-Ilan University research finds AI is reshaping information-seeking behavior worldwide, with the greatest impact in non-English-speaking countries




Bar-Ilan University






Ramat Gan, Israel (August 17, 2026) – Students around the world are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT to find answers to questions about physics, according to a new study led by researchers at Bar-Ilan University.

The study, conducted by Dr. Yossi Ben-Zion and Omer Michaeli of Bar-Ilan University's Department of Physics in collaboration with Prof. Noah Finkelstein of the University of Colorado Boulder, was just published in Physical Review Physics Education Research.

Analyzing search data from more than 20 countries between 2022 and 2025, the researchers found a consistent decline in Google searches for physics concepts, alongside a similar decrease in visits to related Wikipedia articles, coinciding with the rapid adoption of generative AI tools.

“The findings do not suggest that students are learning less,” said Ben-Zion. “Rather, they indicate that many students are shifting from searching across multiple websites to receiving direct, conversational explanations from AI systems.”

One of the study's most striking findings is the difference between English-speaking and non-English-speaking countries. In the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, Google searches for many physics topics remained relatively stable. In contrast, many non-English-speaking countries experienced substantial declines.

The researchers propose that AI may be acting as an educational equalizer by allowing students to receive clear, high-quality explanations in their native language rather than relying primarily on English-language educational resources.

“Generative AI has the potential to reduce the ‘language tax’ faced by millions of students,” the researchers explain. “By making complex scientific concepts more accessible in many languages, these tools may help democratize access to knowledge.”

The study also found that the transition to AI depends on the nature of the subject matter. Google searches declined much more sharply for physics topics that can be explained primarily through text and logical reasoning than for topics that rely heavily on diagrams, graphs and other visual representations.

According to the researchers, this pattern likely reflects the current strengths and limitations of large language models. While AI excels at generating clear verbal explanations, it remains less effective for learning tasks that require sophisticated visual understanding.

The research was based on Google Trends, Google's platform for tracking relative search activity over time and across countries. The team used searches for physics concepts as a proxy for learning-related information seeking. To determine whether the observed trend was unique to Google, they also analyzed page views for physics articles on Wikipedia in seven different languages and found similar patterns.

The findings offer one of the first large-scale, international looks at how generative AI is transforming students' information-seeking behavior, raising important questions about the future of science education and how educational resources should evolve in the AI era.

 

 

Will autonomous AI exceed AI-aided physicians as the best medical care?




JAMA


About the Study: This Perspective discusses the advantages and disadvantages of physician-led medical care vs that provided by artificial intelligence (AI).


Corresponding Author: Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Civic Center Blvd, 8th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (zemanuel@upenn.edu).

10.1001/jama.2026.15380

To access the embargoed study: Visit our JAMA Network Media Center at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2026.15380?guestAccessKey=067a450f-b0a2-4882-b158-3ebdeee02c4d&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=081726

Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

 

Screen use and children’s language development from ages 5 to 7 years



JAMA Pediatrics



About the Study:

 In this cohort study, primary parent smartphone screen time was associated with slower growth in children’s receptive vocabulary, whereas children’s digital device ownership was associated with lower concurrent language performance. These findings highlight the importance of considering screen use within the broader family context when evaluating children’s language development and are potentially informative for parents and clinicians.

This study has an accompanying commentary.

Corresponding Author: Øistein Anmarkrud, PhD, Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Sem Saelands vei 7, PO Box 1140 Blindern, Oslo 0371, Norway (oistein.anmarkrud@isp.uio.no).

10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.3490

To access the embargoed study: Visit our JAMA Network Media Center at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.3490?guestAccessKey=4cf04539-60d6-44ba-9b41-0129d0d1fcd1&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=081726

Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

 

Smartphones, online music streaming, and traffic fatalities



JAMA Network Open


About the Study

In this cross-sectional study of US traffic fatalities, major music album releases, accompanied by increased online streaming, were associated with a significant increase in traffic fatalities, suggesting that online music streaming through smartphones may significantly contribute to distracted driving and traffic fatalities.


Corresponding Author: Anupam B. Jena, MD, PhD, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (jena@hcp.med.harvard.edu).

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.29282

To access the embargoed study: Visit our JAMA Network Media Center at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.29282?guestAccessKey=ed50766b-e719-403d-9559-c9474d5a81c2&utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=081726

Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

 

Pilots, flight attendants have greater risk of radiation-related cancer death than other professions



Findings support efforts to protect U.S. aircrews from cosmic radiation exposure



Harvard Medical School






Of more than 500 occupations in the United States, flight attendants and pilots have the highest and second-highest proportion of radiation-related cancer deaths, a new study has found.

The results support considering occupational radiation protections for U.S. aircrew members commensurate with their level of exposure, said senior author Anupam Jena, the Joseph P. Newhouse Professor of Health Care Policy in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School, and team.

Research shows that aircrew members receive the largest annual effective dose of ionizing radiation of any workforce in the United States, largely due to exposure to cosmic radiation at high altitudes. Members of the profession are also more likely to be diagnosed with certain cancers than the general population. But past studies have been limited as to whether this translates to higher rates of cancer mortality.

The new research, published August 17th in JAMA Internal Medicine, studied this question using a larger dataset and more statistical power than were previously available.

The study, led by Vishal Patel, HMS clinical fellow in surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, used a single population-based data source — the National Vital Statistics System. The group looked at all U.S. death certificates from 2020 to 2024. These records have only recently been linked to the occupation of the decedent. The records yielded data from nearly 13 million decedents across 503 occupations, including 14,000 pilots and 7,000 flight attendants.

The team applied what’s known as a common adjustment approach, which accounted for several factors other than occupation that may affect mortality. These included age at death, sex, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, and marital status.

Radiation-related cancers analyzed here included breast cancer, central nervous system cancers, multiple myeloma, leukemia (except chronic lymphocytic leukemia), lymphoma, thyroid cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, and non-melanoma skin cancers.

The team found that pilots and flight attendants had statistically significantly higher rates of death from breast, central nervous system, and prostate cancers and melanoma. Pilots also had a higher rate of leukemia deaths.

In all, about 6.9 percent of deaths among flight attendants and 6.7 percent of deaths among pilots were from radiation-related cancers, according to the analysis. These proportions were higher than for any of the other professions, including nuclear technologists, who are routinely exposed to radiation from non-cosmic sources yet placed 12th on the list, the authors said.

Aircrew accrue an estimated 3 to 6 millisieverts per year of cosmic radiation (depending on flight paths), an order of magnitude above the estimated 0.4 millisieverts received annually by an average air traveler taking 10 cross-country round-trip flights per year, according to the CDC.

The Federal Aviation Administration formally recognizes pilots and flight attendants as occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation, but unlike other radiation-exposed workers or aircrew in other countries, U.S. aircrew are not subject to federal dose limits or monitoring requirements.

Authorship, funding, disclosures

Jena is also HMS professor of medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. Michael Liu is an additional author of the study.

There was no funding for this study.

Jena reports receiving (in the last 36 months) consulting fees unrelated to this work from Analysis Group; income unrelated to this work from hosting the podcast Freakonomics, M.D.; authorship income from The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal; book rights to Doubleday Books; and speaking fees from the Harry Walker Agency. Jena also reports being an unpaid board member of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).

 

Study finds people who consumed sugar-sweetened beverages on a daily basis had higher risk of stomach cancer




Mass General Brigham



  • Mass General Brigham study finds that consuming at least one sugar-sweetened beverage per day is associated with more than twice the risk of developing gastric cancer compared with very rarely consuming these beverages 

  • Artificially sweetened beverages were not associated with increased risk of gastric cancer, based on data gathered from more than 100,000 people over decades  

Approximately 65% of U.S. adults report consuming one or more sugar-sweetened beverages every day. Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute researchers found that consuming these drinks daily was associated with an increased risk of developing gastric cancer, while artificially sweetened beverages were not associated with an increased risk. Results are published in the journal Gastro Hep Advances. 

Previous studies have linked sugar-sweetened beverages with an increased risk of colorectal, breast, and liver cancers, but evidence on gastric cancer has been limited. The study analyzed data from 112,284 participants in the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Both studies gathered detailed diet, lifestyle and health information on U.S. adults over many decades. During the follow-up period, which spanned decades, 278 participants developed gastric cancer. 

“This is the first study to demonstrate an association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and gastric cancer in a U.S. population,” said senior author Andrew T. Chan, MD, MPH, a gastroenterologist and epidemiologist with the Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute. “Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, but we’ve known very little about how diet might contribute to this cancer.”  

After accounting for other potential risk factors, participants who consumed at least one serving of a sugar-sweetened beverage per day had a 2.45 times higher risk of gastric cancer compared with those who consumed less than one serving per month. The association was observed in both women and men. Higher total fructose intake (fructose is the main sweetener in these drinks) was also associated with greater gastric cancer incidence. For instance, among women in the Nurses’ Health Study, consuming more than one such beverage per day was associated with a 3.04-fold higher risk of gastric cancer, compared to those who very rarely consumed sugar-sweetened beverages. In contrast, after controlling for other factors, higher consumption of artificially sweetened beverages wasn’t associated with a higher incidence of gastric cancer. 

Researchers defined sugar-sweetened beverages as carbonated beverages, punch, lemonade and sports drinks, while artificially sweetened beverages were defined as low-calorie carbonated beverages.  

Because Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection increases the risk of gastric cancer, researchers also assessed H. pylori status in a subset of 940 participants. While just over one third of these participants had evidence of H. pylori infection, there was no association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and infection.  

Limitations of the study include its observational design. It is possible that higher rates of gastric cancer in people who consumed more sugar-sweetened beverages were related to other factors. The study had limited information on H. pylori status and family history of gastric cancer. In addition, participants were predominantly white, limiting the researchers’ ability to examine differences across racial and ethnic groups. However, the large study population and detailed health and lifestyle information gathered over many years allowed the researchers to control for many other possible potential risk factors for gastric cancer. 

The researchers say further studies are needed to confirm the findings and investigate why these beverages might increase gastric cancer risk. 

Authorship: In addition to Chan, Mass General Brigham authors include Tae-Geun Gweon, Jane Ha, Hanseul Kim, Mengxi Du, and Mingyang Song. 

Paper cited: Gweon TG et al. “Association between sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage intake and gastric cancer incidence” Gastro Hep Advances  

Funding: This work was supported by R35 CA253185, U01 CA261961, R01CA263776, and a Stand Up to Cancer Gastric Cancer Interception Dream Team award. 

Disclosures: Chan served as a consultant for Pfizer Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim and received grant support from Freenome Holdings outside the submitted work.  

 

### 

About Mass General Brigham 

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations with several Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals. For more information, please visit massgeneralbrigham.org.