Thursday, July 06, 2023

New IIASA online tool to visualize global migration patterns

Reports and Proceedings

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

IIASA researchers have developed a new tool – the Global Migration Data Explorer – to help address the lack of data on global migration flows and provide a visual method for exploring migration patterns worldwide.

The Global Migration Data Explorer builds upon the success of its predecessor by incorporating estimates of more recent periods, based on advanced estimation methods, and expanding the scope to include different migration measures and breakdowns of migration patterns by sex.

Developed by Guy Abel, a researcher in the Migration and Sustainable Development Research Group of the IIASA Population and Just Societies Program and at Shanghai University, and Xavier Bolló, a data visualization specialist, the website offers users a unique opportunity to delve into the complex dynamics of global migration. It presents six different estimation methods that researchers can use to gain insights into migration flows. These estimation methods are essential due to the scarcity of reliable international migration flow data, hindering the measurement of patterns and trends in global migration flows.

"International migration is becoming an increasingly important component of population growth and a driver for socioeconomic change," explains Abel. "Good data on international migration are crucial for monitoring migration related components of international development agendas and agreements such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration. This website fills a critical gap by providing estimates of migration flows that are invaluable to researchers studying migration systems, demographics, climate change, and epidemiology."

The open-access website allows anyone to explore global migration patterns, providing an intuitive and interactive platform. The underlying code developed by Bolló for displaying the data is available on GitHub, further promoting transparency and further collaboration. Users can access the data behind the visualizations, which are openly available and accessible from the website.

The tool incorporates UN estimates of foreign-born populations, considered the most reliable source of data on global migration. While the UN data provides a snapshot of the migrant population at a specific point in time, the flow estimates offer a period measure of migration, making them more valuable for researchers investigating the causes and consequences of migration.

The team have tentative plans to expand the visualization tool to include internal migration in different countries, such as China. Furthermore, they aim to introduce additional visualizations, including a map-based method, to enhance the user experience and facilitate a deeper understanding of migration patterns.

"We hope that this visualization tool will be used by the public to gain a better understanding of migration patterns and the relative sizes of migration to and from any particular country," notes IIASA Population and Just Societies Program Director, Anne Goujon. "It is particularly rewarding to hear that schoolteachers have expressed their interest in using the website to educate their students, highlighting the need for up-to-date data and the applicability of the tool beyond academia."

Two prominent publications support the website's visualization and estimation methods. A 2019 paper published in Nature, compares the six main estimation methods proposed for estimating global migration. It also introduces a set of validation tests that assess the accuracy of these estimates by comparing them to reported migration flow data, predominantly from affluent Western countries. In addition, a more recent publication focused on generating global migration flow estimates by sex and extends the validation exercises to sex-specific data.

Further information
https://global-migration.iiasa.ac.at/

 

About IIASA:

The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) is an international scientific institute that conducts research into the critical issues of global environmental, economic, technological, and social change that we face in the twenty-first century. Our findings provide valuable options to policymakers to shape the future of our changing world. IIASA is independent and funded by prestigious research funding agencies in Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe. www.iiasa.ac.at

https://selforganizedseminar.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/hardt_negri_multitude.pdf

Multitude: war and democracy in the Age of Empire /. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. p. cm. Sequel to: Empire. Includes index. ISBN 1-59420-024-6. 1 ...


https://monoskop.org/images/9/95/Hardt_Michael_Negri_Antonio_Empire.pdf

4.3 The Multitude against Empire. 393. Notes. 415. Index. 473. Page 11. PREFACE. Empire is materializing before our very eyes. Over the past several decades, as .

https://greattransition.org/images/Hardt-Empire-Multitude.pdf

Political theorist Michael Hardt, co-author with Antonio Negri of a series of influential volumes, including Empire and the recent Assembly, talks with Tellus ...

https://www.radicalphilosophyarchive.com/issue-files/rp120_dialogue_empiremultitude_negri_zolo.pdf

Danilo Zolo For a long time I resisted the calls, from many quarters, to publicly debate. Empire, the book you co-authored with Michael Hardt, ...

Fast, automated, affordable test for cement durability developed at U of I


Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN, NEWS BUREAU

Professor Nishant Garg, standing, and graduate student Hossein Kabir 

IMAGE: PROFESSOR NISHANT GARG, STANDING, AND GRADUATE STUDENT HOSSEIN KABIR USED COMPUTER VISION TO DEVELOP A FAST AND CONVENIENT METHOD FOR TESTING CEMENT DURABILITY THAT CAN BE USED IN THE FIELD OR LABORATORY. view more 

CREDIT: PHOTO BY MICHELLE HASSEL




CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Engineers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign have developed a new test that can predict the durability of cement in seconds to minutes – rather than the hours it takes using current methods. The test measures the behavior of water droplets on cement surfaces using computer vision on a device that costs less than $200. The researchers said the new study could help the cement industry move toward rapid and automated quality control of their materials.

The results of the study, led by Illinois civil and environmental engineering professor Nishant Garg, are reported in the journal npj Materials Degradation.

“Concrete is one of the most consumed materials on our planet, second only to water,” Garg said. “Over time, the concrete used to build our infrastructure degrades over time via exposure to deicing salts; freeze and thaw cycles; and ingress of water – all of which can lead to corrosion of the rebar that is used to strengthen the structures. Ultimately, this leads to failure, sometimes catastrophically, as seen in the 2021 condominium collapse in Surfside, Florida, where 98 lives were lost.”

One of the key tests used to predict the durability of cementitious systems is based on the ability of cement paste – a mixture of cement-based binder and water – to absorb water, Garg said. Water absorption is linked to cement’s durability; the more porous the cement paste is, the more water it will absorb, ultimately leading to corrosion of the embedded rebar in reinforced concrete.

A standard test, known as ASTM C1585, is performed in a lab by exposing a concrete sample that contains cement paste to water while a technician continuously measures the “sorptivity” – or how much water the sample absorbs and transmits – by observing its weight change for several hours, if not days.

In the study, the new device predicts initial sorptivity using computer vision to see how quickly a single water droplet is absorbed into the surface within the first few seconds or minutes. Garg said the test is far less tedious than the current ASTM method and can be performed on the fly in the field or in the lab.

Click here to see a video demonstrating water droplet absorption

“We performed the new test on more than 60 unique samples, and there’s a fairly good correlation between our results and the results from the conventional ASTM test method,” Garg said. “So we are now proposing our new testing method as an alternative to test the durability of cementitious systems in a few seconds.”

In addition to the importance of droplet absorption, the research team also learned that the initial angle at which water droplets come into contact with the cement surface matters, too.

“The dynamics of absorption change quickly while the water droplets change shape on the surface,” Garg said. “Intricacies like these are all factored into our new test.”

Click here to see a video demonstrating water droplets being absorbed from different initial contact angles

The team is currently working on ways to scale up the test for mortars and more varieties of concrete, which are texturally and chemically more complex.

“The key takeaway from the study is that testing the durability of building materials is very slow, tedious and labor-intensive,” Garg said. “With the availability of technologies like computer vision and analysis, we can develop tests that are faster, automated and convenient.”

The department of civil and environmental engineering at Illinois supported this research.

 

Editor’s notes:

To contact Nishant Garg, call 217-300-9448; email nishantg@illinois.edu.

The paper “Rapid prediction of cementitious initial sorptivity via surface wettability” is available online. DOI: 10.1038/s41529-023-00371-4

Global science leaders herald new era of ground-breaking climate and sustainability science at Paris Summit & Symposium


Under the high-patronage of Mr. Emmanuel Macron president of the French republic


Meeting Announcement

HUMAN FRONTIER SCIENCE PROGRAM

Sylvie Retailleau, French Minister of Higher Education and Research at the Summit opening 

IMAGE: SYLVIE RETAILLEAU, FRENCH MINISTER OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AT THE SUMMIT OPENING. view more 

CREDIT: HFSPO AND CHRISTOPHE PEUS




“Fundamental Life Science Meets Climate, Environment, and Sustainability” was organized by the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) together with its partners, and drew more than 2,000 participants from over 40 countries for in-person and online events offered at the Académie des Sciences in Paris from 27-29 June 2023. The events sparked a wholly new approach by bringing together global expertise in basic science from biology, climate change, marine science, ecology, agriculture, psychology, and the social sciences to meet with government officials.

Through the High-Level Summit & Symposium, participants validated important priorities that will greatly assist governments, communities, and science agencies committed to forging a robust sustainability transition:

  1. International collaboration is critical. Ministers and scientists need more opportunities like this to communicate. This Summit & Symposium allowed decision-makers, funders, and scientists to communicate openly and directly regarding the needs of societies and the insight that discovery science can offer. Likewise, next steps must be based on broad inclusion that welcomes professionals from a diverse array of countries, perspectives, and backgrounds in order to have the full complement of expertise available.
  2. Basic frontier life science must be a full partner. To fully understand the global challenges humanity faces, we need the ‘life cycle’ approach that biological sciences can bring to partnerships with climate science, environmental research, physics, and data science. The global challenges are ultimately a threat to life on Earth – the life sciences must be involved in these investigations to inform policymaking.
  3. Systems science is next-generation science. Important policies and societal safeguards can benefit from the knowledge of systems behavior – biological systems, Earth systems, and the common universal truths underlying key systems. Further, the life sciences and physical sciences must partner with the social and behavioral sciences to reflect more accurately how living organisms play key roles in impacting our Earth systems.
  4. Transdisciplinary, frontier science can help people adapt to global challenges. Engineering opportunities for food security, renewable energy, and human resilience can emerge from basic life science research coupled with climate science, marine research, data science and other transdisciplinary approaches. There is a time and a place for discipline-focused basic science, but there is also a need for frontier life science to be involved in solving our rapidly expanding global challenges. In that setting, telescoping translation can benefit humanity and all life on Earth. Truly, the 21st century will be known as the “Age of Biology.”
  5. Responding to global leaders’ call for advanced science. Reiterating what was said in May 2023 during the G7 Summit in Hiroshima and the Science and Technology Ministers' Meeting in Sendai, it is clear that science must now play a vital role for the security and future of humanity and all life on Earth. It is imperative that governments support transdisciplinary basic research that will inform solutions for global challenges.

Next Steps: Frontier Workshops in Three Critical Areas:

A) Beginning in 2024, HFSPO and its global partners, will host Frontier Workshops to further extend the discussions and facilitate new funding opportunities for frontier basic research that will advance the sustainability transition. Each discussion will focus on one of the four thematic areas discussed in Paris:

  • Climate Change and Health;
  • Ocean Biodiversity and Resources at Risk;
  • Food Security in a Changing World; and
  • Individuals, Institutions, and Societal Transformations.

These conversations will be held in geographically diverse locations around the world to formulate a thoughtful, rigorous approach to bringing basic life science into the sustainability transition worldwide. The workshops will engage science ministers, government officials, and leading scientists representing transdisciplinary fields of expertise.

B) To accelerate the impact that frontier life science research can have for the benefit of humanity, HFSPO and its global partners will also host a series of Frontier Workshops highlighting the potential of basic life science research to deliver innovations that can be rapidly translated to applications for public good. These workshops will bring diverse scientists to regional hotspots where there is ample opportunity to make and act on these connections.

C) HFSPO will host Frontier Workshops to identify and recommend approaches to enhance greater inclusiveness in basic life science research organizations and in the frontier life science enterprise on the global scale. The workshops will begin with an event hosted by Canadian life science stakeholders and will be open to all participants interested in creating a welcome environment for diverse perspectives, approaches, and empowering those people and countries who have not been in a position to take active roles in the past.

Select Transdisciplinary Research Presented at the Summit & Symposium Included:

  • Carbon storage in the oceans as a function of microscale mechanisms driving particle degradation, Uria Alcolombri, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Switzerland and Dept of Plant and Environmental Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
  • A systems perspective: human behavior, the environment, and biological feedback loops that create unintended consequences, Ulf Dieckmann, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
  • Plant heat stress, heatwaves, and food security: prediction and mitigation, from molecular genetics to Earth system modeling, Peter Franks, University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Understanding how certain flowers attract pollinators as a predictor for food security, Beverly Glover, Cambridge University, United Kingdom.
  • Heat acclimation and neuronal pacemaker mechanisms that drive heat tolerance and resilience to hot environments, Jan Siemens, Heidelberg University, Institute of Pharmacology, Germany.
  • Why don’t plants get sunburned? How can this help promote food security? Gabriela Schau-Cohen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States.

(To schedule an interview, contact Rachael Bishop, rbishop@hfsp.org, +33 (0)7 81 87 621 21)

The Summit and Symposium was co-hosted by the Honorable Sylvie Retailleau, French Minister of Higher Education and Research, and the International Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO). The events were organized by HFSPO and its partners: French National Agency for Research (ANR), French National Council of Scientific Research (CNRS), French Academy of Sciences, Pasteur Institute, International Science Council (IRS), European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), UNESCO, European Research Council (ERC), and U.N. International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development (IYBSSD).

####

The Human Frontier Science Program was established by the G7 countries at the initiative of former Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone of Japan at the 1987 Venice Summit. Open to scientists of every nation, HFSPO is supported by 17 Members: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, South Africa, Switzerland, the UK, the USA, and the European Commission. The mission of HFSPO is to foster bold, basic, frontier research in the life sciences and interdisciplinary collaborations around the world. Since 1990, close to 8,000 researchers from more than 70 countries have been supported. Of these, 28 HFSP awardees have gone on to win the Nobel Prize.

Researchers map Austria's pig trade network for the first time


Peer-Reviewed Publication

COMPLEXITY SCIENCE HUB VIENNA

A map of Austria's pig trade network 

IMAGE: SPATIAL DENSITY OF PIG FARMS WITH RECORDED MOVEMENTS IN AUSTRIA IN 2021. THE BLACK LINES REPRESENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE BORDERS OF THE FEDERAL STATES. view more 

CREDIT: © COMPLEXITY SCIENCE HUB



The transfer of pigs from one place to another poses the risk of spreading infectious diseases. Knowing how holdings (e.g., farms, markets, etc.) are connected is therefore of crucial importance. In a study by the Complexity Science Hub, the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, and the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), researchers are now drawing a map of the Austrian pig trade for the first time.

Every year, around 250,000 transfers of pigs take place in Austria. Each of these transfers carries a certain risk of spreading swine infectious diseases. To identify possible risks of disease spread and develop targeted preventive measures, it is necessary to know how individual holdings are interconnected.

"We used anonymized daily movement data of live pigs traded in Austria – from birth to slaughterhouses – from 2015 to 2021," explains Gavrila A. Puspitarani, a researcher at the Complexity Science Hub and the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. Based on this, the scientists created a network that maps domestic trades between holdings in Austria.

"With these insights into the pig trade, we can provide valuable support to veterinarians and other stakeholders in developing data-driven approaches for controlling diseases during outbreaks and facilitating preventive actions," explains Amélie Desvars-Larrive of the Complexity Science Hub and the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. Outputs provided in this study can also serve as valuable inputs for developing predictive epidemiological models that simulate the transmission of diseases between farms.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE FEDERAL STATES

By analyzing the network structure, the scientists identified the most significant risks. Typically, this risk is highest in areas with high animal density and frequent transfers. In Austria, there are major differences identified between the federal states. According to the study, the greatest risk arises in Upper Austria and Styria, as these regions account for nearly half (46 percent) of all holdings with significant trading activity. "If an infectious disease outbreak occurs there, it might spread faster than in Vorarlberg, for example, where pig and farm density are much lower," says Desvars-Larrive.

NETWORKS ONLY SPARSELY CONNECTED

The study also shows that the vast majority of pig movements occur within each federal state and rarely across federal states. This increases the chance of controlling infectious diseases quickly and regionally before they propagate across the country.

Moreover, the pig trade network in Austria is not well-connected, which means that the trade frequency between holdings is relatively low, similar to the pig trade networks in Georgia or northern Macedonia. In contrast, pig holdings in Germany or France have more dense connections with some trades covering long distances, which might favor large-scale and long-distance disease spread.

Imports and exports play a minor role in Austria. The self-sufficiency rate of pork production is 103 percent, and only about one to two percent of pigs came from abroad or were exported abroad.

SMALL FARMS AND STABILITY

The majority of farms in Austria are relatively small, with around 60 percent of them keeping fewer than five pigs. At the other end of the spectrum, there are a limited number of signi- ficantly large farms. For instance, in 2021, the largest farm housed more than 15,000 pigs.

The analysis shows that the network in Austria is topologically very stable over time. At the same time, it highlights the important role of certain super-connected holdings as “super-receivers” (receiving a lot of pigs) or “super-spreaders” (sending a lot of pigs) that could be used as “sentinels” for disease detection, for example. "Austria, therefore, shows favorable conditions for the establishment of consistent monitoring and prevention strategies that can be utilized over the long term," explains Puspitarani. And this study can contribute significantly to that.

“Moreover, this research shows the potential of interdisciplinary collaboration, integrating knowledge from multiple disciplines - such as complexity science and veterinary medicine - to address practical issues,” says Puspitarani.
_____

FIND OUT MORE

The paper “Network analysis of pig movement data as an epidemiological tool: an Austrian case study” has been published in the journal Scientific Reports (doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36596-1).
_____

ABOUT THE COMPLEXITY SCIENCE HUB

The mission of the Complexity Science Hub (CSH Vienna) is to host, educate, and inspire complex systems scientists dedicated to making sense of Big Data to boost science and society. Scientists at the Complexity Science Hub develop methods for the scientific, quantitative, and predictive understanding of complex systems.

The CSH Vienna is a joint initiative of AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Central European University CEU, Danube University Krems, Graz University of Technology, Medical University of Vienna, TU Wien, VetMedUni Vienna, Vienna University of Economics and Business, and Austrian Economic Chambers (WKO). https://www.csh.ac.at


The US Supreme Court’s surprising overturn of a 47-year-old precedent on religious accommodation

Opinion by Debbie Kaminer, opinion contributor • 
The Hill -Yesterday




Last week the Supreme Court handed down landmark decisions on affirmative action, student loan forgiveness and LGBTQ+ rights. While these cases rightfully received significant public attention, an equally important case, Groff v. DeJoy, which addresses religious accommodation in the workplace, ended up flying under the radar. The dispute in this case, involved a Sabbatarian postal worker in rural Pennsylvania who quit his job and sued his employer after being subjected to “progressive discipline” for refusing to work his Sunday shifts.

In this surprising unanimous decision written by Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court totally ignored an almost 50-year-old precedent, and significantly reinterpreted a major federal statute, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while pretending that it was relying on its previous decisions. It is not surprising that the conservative justices ruled as they did because some had explicitly stated that they wanted to overturn their prior narrow decision on religious accommodation. However, it comes as a real shock that every liberal Justice joined in the pretense that the court was not overturning longstanding precedent.

To understand why the court’s action is so disturbing, some background is needed. Title VII requires employers to accommodate the religious needs of employees if they can do so without “undue hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business.” In a landmark 1977 case, TWA v. Hardison, the Supreme Court interpreted “undue hardship” to mean more than a “de minimis” or minimal cost. Religious rights activists have long criticized this decision, arguing that the court interpreted undue hardship incorrectly. Regardless of whether the criticism of the “de minimis” standard is valid, the fact remained that until last week this standard was the law.

For almost 50 years, lower courts and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission relied on the de minimis standard when addressing issues involving religious accommodation in the workplace. Even members of Congress who vehemently opposed the de minimis standard acknowledged that it was the law.

Last week, however, the Supreme Court inexplicably determined that the lower courts, Congress and the EEOC were all mistaken and that the Hardison Court did not actually mean what it said when it determined that undue hardship means requiring an employer “to bear more than a de minimis cost.” Rather, the Groff decision determined that because the Hardison Court had in other parts of its opinion stated employers were not required to provide accommodations that resulted in a “substantial” cost, this substantial cost language was the correct interpretation of undue hardship. According to Justice Alito, for the last half century everyone had read the Hardison decision incorrectly.



Newsweek   Supreme Court's Unanimous Ruling On Religious Freedom Has Broad Impacts
0:59



The problem with Justice Alito’s reasoning, is that, after Hardisonwas decided, the Supreme Court itself treated the “de minimis” standard as the authoritative interpretation of undue hardship under Title VII. In Ansonia v. Philbrook, a religious accommodation case that was decided in 1986, the Supreme Court majority’s opinion stated that in Hardison “we determined that an accommodation causes ‘undue hardship’ whenever that accommodation results in “more than a de minimis cost” to the employer.” More recently, in a concurrence in a 2020 case Justices Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch stated that Hardison “endorsed” the de minimis standard. The same three justices, along with Justice Brett Kavanaugh had a year earlier stated the Hardison Court had defined undue hardship as “any accommodation that imposes more than a de minimis burden.”

So why didn’t the court just honestly acknowledge that it was overturning longstanding precedent in replacing the “de minimis” standard with the new “substantial” burden standard? The reason is that this is not how American democracy is supposed to work. Once the Supreme Court interprets a statute, there is a strong presumption against reinterpreting that statute, since if Congress disagrees with the court’s interpretation, it can — and many times has — amended the statute by a simple majority vote. In other words, the court has the power to interpret a statute, and Congress then has the power to let the court know if it interpreted the statute incorrectly.

In fact, Congress amended Title VII in response to previous Supreme Court decisions it disagreed with. For example, in an earlier case interpreting Title VII, the Supreme Court held that sex discrimination did not include pregnancy discrimination. Congress disagreed with this decision, and in response, amended the definition of “sex” in Title VII by passing the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 to explicitly include pregnancy discrimination.

The problem religious advocates faced was that Congress tried and was unable to pass legislation overturning the de minimis standard of Title VII. Over the last 27 years, legislation attempting to overturn this standard was introduced over a dozen times and has never come close to passing.

What is shocking is that the liberal justices played along with this charade. Perhaps they joined the majority opinion as part of a compromise aimed at limiting how far the conservatives would go in expanding an employer’s accommodation requirement. Indeed, during oral arguments it was clear that the justices were looking for a compromise position. Yet regardless of why the liberal justices joined the conservatives, the result is a decision, the unanimity of which implicitly sends the message that it is reasonable. As a result, little attention has focused on the fact the court overturned a 47-year-old precedent which could dramatically impact the rights of many employees in the workplace.

Debbie Kaminer law professor at Baruch College at the City University of New York (CUNY).


Spanish minister proposes €20,000 ‘universal inheritance’ from age of 18

Story by Sam Jones in Madrid • Yesterday 

Photograph: Isabel Infantes/Reuters© Provided by The Guardian

Spain’s leftwing labour minister, Yolanda Díaz, has proposed a scheme to tackle social inequality by giving every young person in the country €20,000 (£17,000) to be spent on study, training or setting up a business once they reach the age of 18.

According to Díaz’s Sumar platform, which announced the policy before Spain’s snap general election on 23 July, the initiative would cost €10bn, which would be raised by taxing the rich.

Sumar said the aim was to guarantee “equality of opportunity” regardless of people’s family backgrounds or earnings. The payments, which would begin at the age of 18 and continue until the age of 23, would be accompanied by administrative support to help people study, train or establish their own business.

“It’s about letting young people have a future and giving them the chance to study or start a business without that having to depend on their surnames or the family they are from,” Díaz told a gathering of foreign correspondents in Madrid on Wednesday afternoon.

“That’s why we’re proposing that people will be given €20,000 when they turn 18 so that they can develop, whether that’s by studying or by setting up a business. That’s what’s at stake on 23 July.”

Díaz confirmed that the policy – called the “universal inheritance” – would be available to all young Spaniards regardless of their economic circumstances and would be funded by taxing people earning more than €3m a year. Sumar estimates it would cost 0.8% of Spain’s GDP.

The minister, who was raised in a staunchly communist household, said she had been unable to follow her own dreams of becoming an employment inspector because there was not enough money for her to spend years studying.

“Becoming an employment inspector in Spain would have taken about five years,” she said. “I’m not an employment inspector because I’m the daughter of working-class parents and I could never have allowed myself to do that. This is a redistributive measure that will allow the young people of our country to have a future regardless of their surname.”

Sumar’s proposal has raised eyebrows on both sides of Spain’s political divide. Nadia Calviño, the economy minister in the socialist-led coalition government, questioned how the policy would work in practice.

“Anyone who proposes giving subsidies or grants without any kind of restrictions when it comes to income levels or aims needs to explain how it would be financed because we’re going to have to carry on with a responsible fiscal policy over the coming years,” Calviño told the Onda Cero radio station on Monday.

The opposition conservative People’s party (PP), which is leading the socialists in the polls but which is expected to have to rely on the support of the far-right Vox party to form a government if it wins the election – was blunter still.

A PP spokesperson accused Sumar of getting her priorities badly wrong and suggested the government focus on other problems in a country where they said “27% of the population is at risk of social exclusion, where the unemployment rate is the highest in Europe, where families can’t make it to the end of the month and where self-employed people are struggling to stay afloat”.
‘Not my King!’: Protesters in Scotland boo, heckle King Charles
NOT MINE EITHER
Story by Michelle Butterfield • Yesterday

Anti-monarchy protesters gathered near St Giles' Cathedral along the Royal Mile ahead of a National Service of Thanksgiving and Dedication to the Coronation Of King Charles III and Queen Camilla on Wednesday in Edinburgh, Scotland. Anti-monarchy groups, including Republic and Our Republic, scheduled the protests to disrupt ceremonial events to mark King Charles III's coronation.
© Danny Lawson / Pool / Getty Images

Anti-monarchist protesters gathered in Scotland on Wednesday to boo, yell and chant "not my King" ahead of King Charles' thanksgiving service in Edinburgh.

A service of dedication for King Charles and Queen Camilla, as a way to mark the coronation, took place at St Giles' Cathedral, where Charles was presented with the country's crown jewels.

Hundreds turned up Wednesday afternoon along the Royal Mile leading to the cathedral with yellow placards, loudly expressing their displeasure with the royal visitors.

Police Scotland confirmed that two women, aged 20 and 21, were arrested during the protest for allegedly trying to climb over a safety barrier on the Royal Mile.

The protests took place during Scotland's Royal Week, or "Holyrood Week," which marks Charles' first since becoming King. The occasion will be marked by several celebrations, including a 21-gun salute, a flypast and a procession through the streets of Edinburgh.

One of the groups involved in the demonstrations was Republic, a pressure group campaigning for the abolition of the monarchy.


Republic tweeted Wednesday that its members would protest outside the police department until those arrested were released, and later confirmed that the anti-monarchists were let go from the station with police warnings.


Protester Evie Smith, who lives on the Royal Mile, told SkyNews that while she's in favour of the monarchy, she wants to see the British Royal Family put more money "back into the country."

"Some people can't even afford a Sunday dinner. Others like nurses are also looking for better pay," she told the outlet.

"I would like to see [the Royals] give significantly more back, as well as all the billionaires."

Grant McKenzie, a member of Republic, told Good Morning Scotland that protesters are upset with the amount of money being spent on pomp and pageantry.

"It's being forced upon us. We've got an unprecedented cost of living crisis," he said.

"I don't think the public in the U.K. are particularly interested in their taxpayer money being put towards a parade up and down the Royal Mile in Edinburgh. It's tone-deaf.

"Of course, people are going to be able to enjoy it if that's what they want to do. Protests by their very nature are disruptive. We will be making ourselves visible and heard."

The co-leaders of the Scottish Green Party declined their invitations to the service, and Member of the Scottish Parliament, Patrick Harvie, said that the service is akin to a "Game Of Thrones-style cosplay exercise," reports Yahoo U.K.

Speaking to a rally outside the Scottish Parliament organized by another group called One Republic, Harvie said, "It is fundamentally at odds with the kind of modern and democratic society we are trying to build here."

He added afterwards: "I recognize there is going to be disruption when there is a major event on. But let’s think about how a modern, democratic head of state would go about their business in Scotland.

"It wouldn’t have this level of pomp and ceremony and rigmarole."



Greta Thunberg charged with disobeying police during climate protest: report

Story by Kathryn Mannie • Yesterday 

Photo of climate activist Greta Thunberg during a June 19 demonstration that reportedly led to her being charged by Swedish authorities for disobeying police orders.© Greta Thunberg/Instagram

Climate activist Greta Thunberg, 20, has reportedly been charged with disobeying a police order in her home country of Sweden after she was photographed being hauled away from a climate protest by two officers.

The incident occurred on June 19, when a group of young climate activists blocked oil tankers from driving down a road at the port of Malmo, a city in southern Sweden. Thunberg wrote in an Instagram post that day saying demonstrators had blocked the road for three days.

"The climate crisis is already a matter of life and death for countless people. We choose to not be bystanders, and instead physically stop the fossil fuel infrastructure. We are reclaiming the future," she wrote alongside photos of young people sitting in a line along a road.

Local daily newspaper Sydsvenskan was the first to report that Thunberg had been charged by police in connection with the demonstration.



Police told the outlet that about thirty trucks were prevented from driving down the road. When police deemed the protest was causing too much of a disturbance, they ordered that protesters move their demonstration to a nearby lawn.

"Everyone was informed individually and it was also filmed by a police officer when this was done," the police external commander in charge of the scene told Sydsvenskan.

Four of the nine protesters who were blocking the road refused to move, including Thunberg. Photos taken at the scene show two police officers escorting Thunberg arm-in-arm away from the road. One photo showed the 20-year-old climate activist's feet fully off the ground as she was hauled away.


If convicted for disobeying a police order, Thunberg can be handed a fine or up to six months in prison. At least one other climate activist was also charged in Malmo district court, Sydsvenskan reported.

"You have the freedom to demonstrate, but you must not demonstrate in such a way that it causes disturbances for others," prosecutor Charlotte Ottosen said, according to Sydsvenskan.

The Swedish central prosecutor's press office could not immediately confirm the report. Thunberg's representatives could not be reached.

Video: Greta Thunberg says energy firms throwing people ‘under the bus’ for their own gain