Thursday, September 03, 2026

AOC faces a 'big decision' — and either path could fundamentally alter her party: report

Matthew Chapman
September 3, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks during the Munich Security Conference (MSC) in Munich, Germany, February 13, 2026. REUTERS/Liesa Johannssen TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has a "big decision" ahead of her — but no matter which path she chooses, she is positioning herself for a transformative role in politics, Axios' Alex Thompson broke down in a YouTube segment released on Thursday.

Ocasio-Cortez, one of the most successful politicians in the Democratic Party's left wing, has to decide whether to angle more towards a presidential run or a Senate run, Thompson argued.

On the presidential path, "she inherits much of [Vermont Sen.] Bernie Sanders' movement. She will raise $100 million without ever attending a single fundraiser. There are thousands of young people, especially across all the states, ready to volunteer for her," said Thompson — all of which would completely upend the race. On the other hand, should she do a Senate run, "Most New York Democrats I talked to believe she would easily defeat Chuck Schumer in a primary," which, since he is Democrats' Senate Leader, would completely reshape the upper chamber.

It's currently unclear which way she is leaning, said Thompson. "On one hand, she has campaigned in upstate New York, and she's been very careful to maintain her relationships within the state Democratic Party. But AOC has also made several moves that presidential candidates do."

Meanwhile, he added, she has issued endorsements in key races around the country, and also refined her message, distancing herself from what she calls "Woke 1," or an era, often defined as the late 2010s and 2020s, in which progressive politicians had such esoteric and fringe ways of talking about social justice that the average voter barely understood them.

No matter which path she chooses, said Thompson, one thing seems to be clear: she is trying a unity plan.

"She's riding a wave of disillusionment with the Democratic establishment," he said, in much the same way Sanders has. "But AOC is not Bernie. Bernie is an insurgent, and not always a team player. AOC wants to be a team player. In some ways, she has positioned herself as a bridge between the establishment and the Bernie insurgency. That is why AOC has a chance to become the Democratic nominee."

‘Tomorrow, It Could Be Any of Us’: Dems Probe Trump Plan to Aim IRS at Left-Leaning Nonprofits

“Organizations should never face IRS scrutiny because political officials disapprove of their views.”


US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, accompanied by President Donald Trump, speaks to members of the media aboard Air Force One on October 27, 2025.
(Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Sep 03, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

A pair of Senate Democrats on Thursday launched an investigation into reports that the Trump administration is planning to weaponize the Internal Revenue Service against left-leaning nonprofits, targeting the tax-exempt status of groups seen as political enemies of the White House and potentially burying the organizations with huge penalties without adequate due process.

Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) announced their inquiry in response to recent reporting by the right-wing New York Post, which reported late last month that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the IRS “could revoke the tax-free status of left-wing nonprofits such as George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations.”

Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, and Warnock called the story “disturbing” and argued it suggests “political considerations—including the timing of the 2026 midterm elections—are influencing” the administration’s targeting of left-leaning nonprofits. The NY Post, which cited three unnamed sources familiar with the matter, reported that “Bessent’s inner circle is drafting a blueprint that could ultimately strip non-compliant organizations of their 501(c)(3) status.”

“The reviews could result in massive back payments and civil penalties,” the outlet added.

The Democratic senators noted in a letter to Bessent and Frank Bisignano, the chief executive of the IRS, that Section 7217 of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits senior executive branch officials from “directly or indirectly” requesting that the IRS conduct or terminate an investigation into any particular taxpayer.

“The New York Post’s reporting fits a wider pattern of the Trump administration actively using national security directives to weaponize the IRS against protected First Amendment speech,” Wyden and Warnock wrote, citing the presidential memorandum known as NSPM-7. “Rather than targeting actual violence, these directives explicitly conflate terrorism with subjective political viewpoints—such as ‘anti-capitalism,’ ‘anti-Christianity,’ and views on race, migration, and gender.”

Wyden and Warnock demanded that the Treasury Department and IRS turn over the reported “blueprint” crafted by Bessent’s inner circle as well as “all policies, directives, guidance, criteria, and other documents concerning Treasury and IRS implementation of NSPM-7 as it relates to tax-exempt organizations, including criteria for selecting organizations for examination or possible revocation.”

The senators also demanded to know whether any executive branch officials in the Trump administration have “identified or recommended” particular organizations—including any of those named in the Post report—for IRS investigation.

“Americans of every political persuasion must be able to trust that the IRS applies the tax code objectively under one set of rules,” Wyden and Warnock wrote. “Organizations that violate section 501(c)(3) should face appropriate enforcement regardless of their politics—and organizations should never face IRS scrutiny because political officials disapprove of their views.”

The senators launched their probe as two Democrats in the House of Representatives introduced legislation aimed at guaranteeing that the IRS can’t strip nonprofit organizations of their tax-exempt status “without evidence and without a fair process.”

Reps. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) and Terri Sewell (D-Ala.), the lead sponsors of the Protecting the Rights of Organizations Fairly (PROOF) Act, note that “under current law, many due process protections that are supposed to apply when the IRS examines most nonprofits exist only in the agency’s own internal manual—guidance the IRS can rewrite or suspend on its own authority through an internal memo with no public comment, no rulemaking, and no vote, and that carries no force of law.”

“The IRS should never be a weapon to punish a president’s political enemies,” Doggett said in a statement on Thursday. “No organization—left, right, or center—should lose its tax-exempt status on an accusation, without evidence, and without a fair chance to be heard.”

“The PROOF Act is simple,” he added. “If the government wants to take away a nonprofit’s status, it has to show its proof and follow the law. Today, it may be an organization to which the Trump regime objects. Tomorrow, it could be any of us.”
Analysis Finds Up to 10 Million People Have Lost Healthcare Coverage During Trump’s Second Term

“Over half the provisions of the Big Ugly Bill have already gone into effect, and the negative results are already devastating.”


Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) spoke at a “Save Our Healthcare” rally on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on March 12, 2025.
(Photo: Rashida Tlaib/Facebook)

Brad Reed
Sep 03, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Independent healthcare analyst Charles Gaba on Thursday published a detailed report estimating that up to 10 million people living in the US have lost their healthcare coverage since the start of President Donald Trump’s second term.

In his analysis, Gaba brought together the most recent enrollment data for Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Breaking things down by program, Gaba estimated there are 5.9 million fewer people enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP, as well as at least 4.5 million fewer people enrolled in the ACA, since Trump returned to power in January 2025.

These losses in coverage are somewhat mitigated by Medicare, whose enrollment has increased by around 1.6 million people during Trump’s second term.

Losing access to these programs doesn’t mean that the people were on them have gotten well paying jobs and are receiving insurance from their employer, Gaba wrote. Given that the unemployment rate has risen during Trump’s second term, Gaba suggested it is highly unlikely that there are now more people who get employer-sponsored coverage now than in January 2025.

Depending on a number of variables, Gaba concluded, somewhere between 8.8 million to 10.3 million fewer people now have healthcare coverage.

Adjusting for population growth, Gaba added, “you get a grand total of between 10.27 million and 11.75 million more Americans not enrolled in a public healthcare coverage program as of May 2026 than in were as of January 2025.”

The healthcare analyst noted that “this isn’t quite the same thing as counting how many lost coverage, but not having healthcare sucks regardless of how you slice it.”

He also pointed out that the lost in healthcare coverage all came before the Medicaid work requirements from the GOP’s 2025 budget law are put into effect.

“Over half the provisions of the Big Ugly Bill have already gone into effect,” wrote Gaba, “and the negative results are already devastating.”

Gaba’s analysis was published just days after the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families released a report estimating that nearly 2.5 million children in the US have lost access to Medicaid or CHIP during Trump’s second term.

Trump and congressional Republicans have taken a number of actions that have made healthcare less affordable.

First, they cut spending on Medicaid by an estimated $900 billion over a 10-year period when they enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in 2025. The Congressional Budget Office projects these cuts will leave more than 10 million fewer people enrolled in the program by 2034.

GOP lawmakers last year also refused to extend enhanced subsidies for insurance plans purchased through the ACA, even as insurers raised premiums on those plans by an average of 26% this year, according to an analysis published by KFF.

According to Wednesday reporting by Politico, hospitals are sounding the alarm about new regulations being proposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that they say would cost hundreds of billions of dollars in lost revenue.

“If the rules are finalized and they lose hundreds of billions on top of Congress’ funding cuts,” Politico reported, “hospitals say they’ll be forced to reduce services, lay off workers, consolidate operations or shutter entirely.”
White House launches arcade game where players ‘deport’ people: report


Erik De La Garza
September 3, 2026 
RAW STORY

The Trump White House has turned its mass-deportation campaign into an online arcade game.

The administration on Thursday added an "Arcade" to the White House website and dropped five low-resolution games promoting President Donald Trump’s political agenda, The Associated Press reported. They included one titled "Rio Run," modeled after the classic game "Snake," where players control a man resembling Trump who moves across the screen rounding up people to be “deported."

Another game resembles the classic Nintendo game “Tetris” but requires players to assemble a border wall while small green aliens rush toward what it calls "the coming horde.”

“If the wall gets too high or if too many aliens rush past the wall before it's properly built up, the player loses -- and ‘Border Breached’ flashes along the screen,” according to a TMZ report.

“The Executive Branch has jumped into the same arena as Nintendo, PlayStation, and Xbox,” the outlet wrote Thursday, describing the new releases as arcade games that “MAGA supporters will love.”

The three other games are less controversial. One promotes healthy school lunches, while another mimics “Flappy Bird” and features a bald eagle attempting to deliver legislation to Congress, according to the report.

The immigration-themed games arrive as the administration continues its nationwide immigration crackdown.


'Disgusting': Trump's taxpayer-funded 'deport' arcade sparks instant fury online

Erik De La Garza
September 3, 2026
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump’s new online arcade was met with instant ridicule Thursday as critics accused the White House of focusing on remaking classic video games while Americans faced soaring prices.

The administration launched a series of Trump-themed games, including “Build the Wall,” a Tetris knockoff, and “Rio Run,” which allows players to gather and “deport” potential border crossers.

But it wasn’t all fun and games for social media users, who blasted the White House for turning controversial immigration policies into entertainment while Americans struggle with rising costs.

“Average gas price across America has now risen to $4.14,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) wrote on X. “What is @WhiteHouse focused on? See below. November is coming.”

Retired intelligence officer and history teacher Travis Akers similarly argued that the MAGA administration's priorities were misplaced.

“You can’t afford gas and groceries, but Trump is spending millions of your tax dollars to make old video games,” he told his social media followers.

“Heating oil is near an all-time high but hey you can play Border Czar Tom Homan in a video game,” Connecticut state Sen. Matt Lesser wrote on X.

“They can’t be serious with this s**t smh,” popular political account Wu Tang is for the Children posted Thursday. “They literally can’t do a single thing that can actually help Americans in a meaningful way in their everyday lives.”

Oxford professor of poetry Alice E. Stallings offered a one-word reaction: “Disgusting.”

The White House, meanwhile, appeared unmoved by the criticism.

“CAN’T STOP WINNING,” the official White House account posted on X as it dropped a link to the games.

Conservative actor Kevin Sorbo offered his own take, writing: “This is hilarious," while Democratic strategist Mike Nellis simply wrote: "Stupid


Trump's Venezuela oil deal exposed as 'absolutely disgusting' grab: analyst


Matthew Chapman
September 3, 2026 
RAW STORY

Will Saletan from The Bulwark unloaded on Thursday about President Donald Trump's new oil deal with Venezuela — a turn of events that, he said, lays bare how "absolutely disgusting" Trump's plot has been all along.

Trump, said Saletan, "said it more than doubles American oil reserves ... and he wrote this: 'One of the things I'm going to do with the Venezuelan oil is fill up the strategic national reserves,'" which were depleted severely by Trump's war with Iran. He claims that this oil is a "gift from Venezuela to the people of the United States."

Right-wing outlets aren't even trying to hide what this is anymore, said Saletan. They aren't claiming that Trump's operation to capture Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro was about liberating the people, he added, leading him to conclude that it was always about oil.

For example, Saletan noted, right-wing commentator Ben Ferguson said of the deal, "I think this vice president and president understand this is a moment in Venezuela where you could have a lot of leverage, and you could get something good, and clearly they're willing to play ball. Now, that's big — they're willing to play along because we have leverage." The leverage, Saletan noted, is the fact that America just attacked their country.

Meanwhile, he said, Rachel Campos-Duffy, the wife of Trump's Transportation Secretary, acknowledged on Fox News, "I think in Venezuela, the reviews on this are very mixed — mostly negative — among them, not because they're not happy about the potential economic upsides, but they don't trust Delcy Rodríguez" — that being the acting president the U.S. installed in place of Maduro, despite her having all the same policies as her predecessor apart from being more open to do oil deals.

Even Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL) — who has talked a big game about genuine liberation for Latin American countries — is now saying, "The United States helped them liberate themselves from Maduro. So the reward is to give fair benefits to the oil companies," including "100 years" of being able to exploit the country's oil reserves. "This is the way Trump and his allies in Congress think — it's always, always about the money," said Saletan.

But perhaps the most damning admission, said Saletan, came from former Trump deputy National Security Adviser Victoria Coates, who said Venezuelan oil contracts should "enshrine this deal so a change of government will not imperil those billions of dollars of investment we're going to have to see out of our private sector to make this work." In other words, it needs to be set up so even if the current regime is replaced with a democracy, the oil still flows no matter what the Venezuelan people want.

"Look, I don't know what your political views are. Maybe you believe in capitalism, maybe you don't," concluded Saletan. "But one thing we should all agree on is that this corrupt, coercive deal is disgusting and ruthless, and it's wrong. It is a total perversion of capitalism combined with the worst kind of socialism."


Venezuela Under Siege: What Should Progressives Do?

Our first responsibility is not to prescribe Venezuela’s political course, but to challenge the coercive power our own government exercises over it.


(L-R) National Assembly president Jorge Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim president Delcy Rodríguez, and Minister of Interior Diosdado Cabello (R) arrive to the delivery of the first year’s government report at Palacio Federal Legislativo on January 15, 2026 in Caracas, Venezuela.
(Photo by Jesus Vargas/Getty Images)


Roger D. Harris
Sep 02, 2026
Common Dreams

Ever since Hugo Chávez became Venezuela’s president in 1999 and initiated the Bolivarian Revolution, the country has been under siege by the US. The aggression escalated with the kidnapping of its lawful president, part of a larger and accelerating assertion of US imperial power worldwide. The Bolivarian Revolution survived but is in a forced tactical retreat.

For progressives outside Venezuela, this presents a difficult question. How should we respond when a government resisting US domination makes compromises that we may oppose, but does so under conditions largely imposed by Washington?

This article argues that criticism has its place. But it also needs to be contextualized in the larger struggle over Venezuela’s sovereignty and the consequences of weakening a government confronting overwhelming US power.
Chávez: Founding of the Bolivarian Revolution

Tension between solidarity with an actually existing revolutionary process and criticism of its compromises has recurred throughout the Bolivarian Revolution. Among the first on the left to part company with the Chavista government were anarchists, who proclaimed that they were second to none in supporting revolutions against imperialism—until those projects succeeded in achieving state power.

We can all agree that the Rodríguez government faces demands backed by overwhelming US power and unite to oppose the continuing imperialist siege. Those of us living in the imperial core must aim the main blow at the conditions that have necessitated such retreats.

This tendency still affirmed their abstract solidarity with “the people” but not with their chosen representatives. They felt betrayed because the Bolivarian leadership failed to fulfill their expectations to build a workers’ state on a suitably expeditious timetable.

Riding a global commodities boom, the Bolivarian Revolution funded major social welfare programs, prioritizing poor and working people. To finance these measures, over half of Venezuela’s oil exports and 60% of its overall exports were sold to the US. Dependency on oil sales deepened, with oil accounting for over 95% of the country’s foreign earnings.

Chávez proclaimed the goal of a socialist future, although he pardoned the unsuccessful 2002 coup plotters in an effort—perhaps mistaken—to encourage a cooperative domestic business class. He pragmatically sought opportunities to negotiate with them.
Maduro: Intensification of the Imperialist Siege

When Chávez died in March 2013, his chosen successor Nicolás Maduro won the snap presidential election. Maduro carried the Bolivarian project forward but under geopolitical conditions markedly different from his predecessor. Venezuela scholar Steve Ellner argues that there were no substantive political differences between the two leaders.

During Chávez’s illness, economic problems had accumulated (e.g., a dysfunctional currency exchange system). Maduro was under intense pressure from the moment he entered office.

Immediately, the US-backed and funded opposition started the guarimbas, demonstrations intended to accomplish by violence what they had failed to achieve at the ballot box. Washington, meanwhile, stepped up its hybrid war. Soon oil prices crashed and the US, under President Barack Obama, initiated ever more punishing sanctions in 2015.

Under these coercive measures, the Venezuelan economy by 2019 was in free fall with inflation over 100,000%. Never had an economy contracted so much in modern peacetime.

At this time of maximum weakness, a faction of the Venezuelan Communist Party developed a strategic disagreement with the governing coalition. It argued that the revolution should confront its class enemies more aggressively and expropriate major corporations, rather than seek a temporary rapprochement.

The nearly overwhelming task of righting the economy was ultimately achieved under Maduro’s leadership. After precipitous economic contraction, Venezuela has experienced positive economic growth since 2021. Never had a petro-economy achieved such a turnaround, which included near food sovereignty. To do so, the government relied foremost on the strong Chavista base. It also had to appeal to nationalistic elements among the bourgeoisie and offer them economic incentives to secure their cooperation.

Venezuela was not unique in making such accommodations. During this period, Cuba and Nicaragua—the two other Latin American countries striving for socialism—also introduced market-oriented reforms. With all three countries, the measures were pragmatic adjustments to a world economy dominated by the US and hostile to socialism.
Kidnapping of Maduro

The events leading up to Maduro’s abduction on January 3 involved an ever-intensifying regime-change campaign by the US in concert with its allies: asphyxiating sanctions, stolen assets, diplomatic isolation, cyberattacks, assassination attempts, mercenary invasions, among other measures. The last two months saw a total naval blockade on Venezuelan oil shipments, cutting the country’s economic lifeline.

Regardless, Maduro repeatedly maintained his longstanding willingness to negotiate with Washington. Just two days before his abduction, Maduro outlined a program of accommodation in his annual New Year’s interview with Ignacio Ramonet. This is the program that his successor Delcy Rodríguez has followed, including the amnesty and hydrocarbons laws.

The Bolivarian Revolution persevered. Its accommodations may be understood as tactical responses to unfavorable conditions rather than as a full abandonment of the project.

The fact that Maduro did not waver and the Bolivarian Revolution did not break presented a dilemma for Washington. The US—especially as its aggression against oil-rich Iran was heating up—needed access to Venezuelan oil. Neither country benefited by keeping the oil in the ground.

Yet the US had painted itself into a corner. The Trump administration had demonized Maduro as a narco-trafficker. Even though Maduro was more than willing to negotiate, the US had precluded that option. The kidnapping followed.
Rodríguez: Negotiated Sovereignty

The US invasion of Venezuela on January 3 demonstrated to both the leadership and the Venezuelan grassroots that they were alone—no country came to their defense. Whatever guardrails had existed before on the hegemon were down.

Yet the Bolivarian Revolution did not collapse. The highly polarized nation did not fall into civil unrest between Chavistas and opposition—if anything, it unified. The far-right María Corina Machado did not make her triumphal return to Caracas. Instead, that part of the opposition found itself discredited and in disarray.

In a seamless constitutional transition, Maduro’s vice president was sworn in as president. The Chavista movement united behind Acting President Delcy Rodríguez. Venezuela’s national recovery continues under a negotiated sovereignty where the US now bargains—with the ever-present threat of an even more lethal military action—over matters that should be the sole purview of Venezuelans.

Finding a way forward

The Bolivarian Revolution persevered. Its accommodations may be understood as tactical responses to unfavorable conditions rather than as a full abandonment of the project.

For international solidarity activists, the central question is how to forge a stance that advances the anti-imperialist struggle under these conditions. Those of us who support national sovereignty and self-determination should understand that what Venezuela is suffering relates to our failure to constrain our own imperialists.

Aiming the punch at the target. We can all agree that the Rodríguez government faces demands backed by overwhelming US power and unite to oppose the continuing imperialist siege. Those of us living in the imperial core must aim the main blow at the conditions that have necessitated such retreats.

We can all unite on actions to demand freeing President Maduro and “First Combatant” Cilia Flores from jail in New York City, ending sanctions, and returning stolen assets.

Differences among progressives. A useful distinction can be made between disagreements within the “left camp” and the fundamental conflict with imperialism. This does not mean suppressing differences or assuming that they are unimportant. Rather, it suggests approaching tensions among forces resisting imperialism in ways that seek common ground and avoid turning secondary differences into antagonistic ones.

Contextualizing criticism. Under pressure from Washington, the Rodríguez government deported former Venezuelan diplomat and minister Alex Saab and has established consular relations with Israel. These are among the bitter pills to swallow. Criticism of such actions may be entirely warranted, but should be assessed in light of the extraordinary constraints under which the Rodríguez government is operating.

A related example is Cuba, which is forced to tolerate a US military base and torture center in Guantánamo, has had the indignity of having the US secretary of war and the commander of the US Southern Command visit, and has introduced pro-capitalist economic reforms. Those reforms should be understood as “strategic adaptation” according to an article in Black Agenda Report. While not welcoming these accommodations to the US siege, international solidarity activists still unite with and defend Cuba.

Considering the alternatives. For example, the US and its allies waged wars of aggression and deposed Iraq’s Saddam Hussein in 2003, Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad in 2024. There were left critiques of these leaders but, in all instances, there were no viable left alternatives to them; nor were conditions for their people improved by their removal. There is no “third way” in a war.

This suggests that the relevant question is not whether a preferable government can be imagined, but what forces actually stand to replace the existing government. For Venezuela, if not the Rodríguez government, what is the actual alternative?

After 26 years of siege and domestic polarization, the Venezuelan people yearn for peace, reconciliation, and reconstruction—more so than ever after the devastating twin earthquakes on June 24. For those of us abroad, we can only imagine the difficulties of life under sanctions from the US and its allies.

Regional trends. Developments in Venezuela reflect a broader shift in Latin America under the “Donroe Doctrine,” where Trump’s reactionary wave has flooded the former Pink Tide. Venezuela should therefore be understood in the context of this region-wide sea change.

Not since Maduro’s election in 2024 has a leftist won in the region. We have witnessed a succession of far-rightists replace center-left presidents in Latin America. Last year, Nasry Asfura replaced Xiomara Castro in Honduras, José Antonio Kast replaced Gabriel Boric in Chile, and Rodrigo Paz replaced Luis Arce in Bolivia. This year, Abelardo de la Espriella replaced Gustavo Petro in Colombia. Coming up in October is the Brazilian presidential election pitting Flávio Bolsonaro against incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, with Trump actively interfering as he did in the other contests.

In all cases, the incumbents faced considerable criticism from the left. Yet whatever their shortcomings, the alternatives have been, or would be, less desirable.
Conclusion

Venezuela is not an isolated case. How progressives weigh criticism against solidarity, assess governments operating under US pressure, and consider the actual alternatives is increasingly relevant throughout the region.

Remarkably, given the intense pressure from the imperialists, the core Chavista leadership, the Socialist Party (PSUV), the civil-military union, the high courts and legislature, and the communes and grassroots organizations have all remained unified. Preserving that unity is particularly important; Bolivia’s experience of left fragmentation offers a cautionary example.

Our tasks are to educate the broader public about what is happening in Venezuela under extreme duress and to take collective action against the imperialist siege.

Between the Rubio State Department and corporate media, on one hand, and rejection of the Rodríguez government by some on the left, on the other, there is a vast intermediate terrain that needs to have a voice.

Whatever disagreements progressives may have with decisions made in Caracas, those decisions belong ultimately to Venezuelans. Our first responsibility is not to prescribe Venezuela’s political course, but to challenge the coercive power our own government exercises over it. The Venezuelans have not told us how to make our revolution; we should do the same for them.

Our tasks are to educate the broader public about what is happening in Venezuela under extreme duress and to take collective action against the imperialist siege. The Bolivarian Revolution has not failed. But the project urgently requires relief.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Roger D. Harris
Roger D. Harris is with the Task Force on the Americas and the US Peace Council.
Full Bio >


Trump Accused of Using Iran War Energy Crisis as ‘Cover for a Resource Grab’ in Venezuela

“Oil reserves in Venezuela will do nothing to lower families’ bills today,” said one campaigner.



President Donald Trump watches the US military’s assault on Venezuela unfold on January 3, 2026.
(Photo by Donald Trump’s Truth Social Account/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Aug 31, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

President Donald Trump was accused over the weekend of exploiting an energy crisis of his own creation to make the case for what he dubiously characterized as “the biggest oil deal in world history” with Venezuela, a country that the US illegally attacked earlier this year in an operation to abduct its then-president, Nicolás Maduro.

“Trump drove up gas prices by launching a devastating war with Iran. Now he is using the energy crisis he created as cover for a resource grab of Venezuela’s oil,” Allie Rosenbluth, US program manager at Oil Change International, said in a statement on Sunday. “The announcement confirms his aggression against Venezuela was about securing power, profits, and fossil fuels.”

The newly announced agreement—which Trump and Venezuela’s acting president, Delcy Rodríguez, said involved the development of fields with potentially 65 billion barrels of oil—came as gas prices in the US remained above $4 per gallon. According to AAA, this month is “poised to set a new record as the most expensive August at the pump,” as the national average price for a gallon of gas has been above $4 every day of the month for the first time.

Rosenbluth, like other analysts, questioned the impact of Trump’s deal with Venezuela on the US energy crisis, which has become a major political problem for the president and his Republican Party heading into the midterms.

Trump, who has significant fossil fuel company holdings, claimed the deal would “substantially lower gas prices” and help replenish the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which is at its lowest level in decades after the president ordered the release of 172 million barrels following Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz in response to US aggression.



Trump announced the deal with Venezuela on Friday, which marked six months since the US and Israel started bombing Iran.

“Oil reserves in Venezuela will do nothing to lower families’ bills today,” said Rosenbluth. “Increasing production of this extremely heavy and dirty crude would take years and billions of dollars. A bet on new Venezuelan oil production that may take a decade or more to materialize is a bet against solving the climate crisis already destroying lives and livelihoods every day. The immediate winners are the oil companies and private investors given access to Venezuela’s resources, while Venezuelans lose sovereignty, and communities in Venezuela and along the US Gulf Coast face more pollution and harm.”

“Trump’s attacks on Iran and Venezuela expose the vicious cycle of fossil fuel dependence: Wars secure access to oil, oil fuels violence and militarization, prices become more volatile, and fossil fuel companies profit while ordinary people pay,” Rosenbluth added. “Real energy security comes from phasing out fossil fuels and investing in affordable, renewable energy.”

Gerald Kepes, president of the consultancy firm Competitive Energy Strategies, noted in an interview with NPR that the US has no “government-owned operational capability per se in the oil and gas sector,” raising the question of “who’s going to operate on the ground?”

Chevron is currently the only US oil company actively producing in Venezuela. NPR reported that “there’s a private Venezuelan company involved in the deal,” but the details remain murky.
‘Declare a Worldwide Climate Emergency’: Death Toll in Nepal-Tibet Floods Tops 1,000

“The glacial collapse and deluge,” one scientist said, “was the structural failure of a mountain itself, nature’s latest commentary on the deadly consequences of human-caused planetary warming.”


Residents sit beside debris following flash floods in Devighat, in Nepal’s Nuwakot district, on August 31, 2026.
(Photo by Arun Sankar/AFP via Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Sep 01, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

With more than 1,000 people dead as of Tuesday and rescue teams still searching for the thousands missing after a glacial collapse in the Himalayas that created a flooding crisis in Nepal and Tibet last week, campaigners, politicians, and scientists reiterated the need for global climate action.

China confirmed at least 16 people are dead and 546 are missing in Tibet, including 261 foreign nationals, while Nepal reported 1,003 deaths and 3,916 more unaccounted for, including 583 foreigners, according to The Associated Press. Among those missing in Nepal are about 900 workers from a dozen hydropower projects, 500 of whom are believed to be trapped in tunnels.


With 350+ Dead and 1,300 Missing, Nepal Carnage Seen as Climate Disaster

Thousands have been rescued since last Wednesday, and as the AP noted, “authorities in Nepal have been burying bodies in temporary graves until they can be identified. They are preserving DNA samples, photographing distinguishing facial features, and recording other identifying details. Each body is assigned a reference number to help families identify and claim the remains later.”


Nepali Prime Minister Balendra Shah has emphasized in recent days that “the flood in the Bhote Koshi River in Rasuwa was not an ordinary flood,” and “it is now time for us to strongly raise with the international community the issue of the disasters we are experiencing as a result of climate change.”

In a Monday interview with The New York Times, Maheshwar Dhakal from Nepal’s Ministry of Agriculture, Forest, and Environment also linked the disaster to human-caused climate change and said that “those who have contributed the least are suffering the most.”

Dhakal estimated the recovery cost at $5 billion, and shared his government’s letter to the United Nations’ fund for such disasters, which says in part that “early action in Nepal would send a signal that the fund is capable of responding with humanity, speed, flexibility, and solidarity when climate-vulnerable countries face losses and damages beyond their capacity to address alone.”



Stefan Rahmstorf, a scientist at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, highlighted on social media Tuesday that experts have long warned about the kinds of disasters seen in the Himalayas over the past week.

“Why are climate scientists not surprised about mountains being destabilized by glacier melt and permafrost thaw?” he asked. “Because they have long predicted that as a result of global heating.”

Bill McGuire, professor emeritus of geophysical and climate hazards at University College London, wrote in a Tuesday column for The Guardian that “the increasingly temperamental behavior of the Earth beneath our feet teaches us that global heating is all-pervasive. It will intrude into every aspect of our lives and livelihoods, and leave no part of the planet untouched. As the world processes the horror of the events in Nepal and Tibet, it is a lesson that we ignore at our peril.”



Also writing for the British newspaper on Tuesday, Michael Mann, a renowned climate scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, similarly stressed that “the glacial collapse and deluge in Nepal and Tibet was not a freak weather event; it was the structural failure of a mountain itself, nature’s latest commentary on the deadly consequences of human-caused planetary warming. And it was the exclamation point on a summer of extremes, illustrating with a sole unnatural disaster the apocalyptic future that lies in store if we fail to take dramatic climate action.”

Mann pointed to the lack of such action in the United States—the world’s largest historical climate polluter—where President Donald Trump openly courted Big Oil on the campaign trail and has served the climate-wrecking fossil fuel industry’s interests since returning to the White House last year, from declaring a national energy emergency and ditching the Paris Agreement, again, to waging a war on renewable power projects.

“Trump and enabling congressional Republicans continue to double down on policies favoring fossil fuel extraction and dependence at the very time we need to be moving even more quickly away from fossil fuels toward clean energy,” Mann wrote. “These extreme events underscore the urgency of taking action now, and—while there are many things we can do—one of the greatest opportunities Americans will have to affect climate policy is the upcoming midterm election. You can make support for urgent and dramatic climate action a litmus test issue as you go to the voting booth.”



Highlighting that dozens of Americans are among those still missing in Asia, the US-based watchdog group Public Citizen argued on social media Tuesday that “this isn’t just a climate change catastrophe. It’s a crime. For decades, Big Oil knew fossil fuels would lead to disasters like this. Big Oil must be held accountable.”

In 2024, the group published a legal memo detailing how local or state prosecutors in the United States could bring criminal charges against Big Oil for deaths from extreme heat made more likely by the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency. With rapidly advancing attribution science, the approach could also be applied to other disasters linked to the human-caused crisis.

Greenpeace International also demanded accountability for the industry on Tuesday, saying that “it makes us SICK to think of people losing their homes, their livelihoods, and the people they love to fires, floods, and storms, while fossil fuel companies make billions. A FRACTION of those obscene profits could help communities rebuild. MAKE POLLUTERS PAY.”

“Make oil, coal, and gas corporations pay their fair share for the damage they cause,” the advocacy group added. “Introduce new taxes or fines on them to help communities at home and around the world rebuild from climate disasters and invest in climate solutions.”

 Nepal warns of possible fresh flooding as communities grapple with devastation

DHADING, Nepal (AP) — The missing include hundreds of people from over a dozen countries who were in the region to work, visit the mountains or make a pilgrimage to a sacred peak.
Relatives comfort Jantari Gurung, whose husband is missing, as she looks at photographs of people killed in flash floods displayed outside a government hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal, Sunday, Aug. 30, 2026. (AP Photo/Dar Yasin)


DHADING, Nepal (AP) — Authorities in Nepal warned of possible fresh flooding on Sunday and urged residents in flood-affected districts to remain on high alert after water levels rose in the Bhotekoshi River.

Flood warning notices were sent to people’s phones early Sunday as rescue crews worked to clear a major highway connecting Kathmandu to one of the areas worst hit by Wednesday’s catastrophic floods, which killed at least 800 people and left more than 3,000 missing in Nepal and Tibet.

The latest warnings came after Chinese authorities informed their Nepalese counterparts of increased water flow upstream, according to Dharam Raj Uprety, chief executive of Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority.

The Chinese state news agency Xinhua, citing the country’s water resources ministry, said a new lake formed after Wednesday’s floods high in the mountains had largely drained.

But Xinhua said the ministry warned that a crater located 5.6 kilometers (3.5 miles) upstream, which held an estimated 1.4 million cubic meters (370 million gallons) of water, still posed some risk and required close monitoring.

Nepal’s disaster agency said Sunday the death toll had climbed to 788 with 2,502 missing, while Chinese authorities reported 16 deaths and 546 missing on the Chinese side of the border.

The missing include hundreds of people from over a dozen countries who were in the region to work, visit the mountains or make a pilgrimage to a sacred peak. On Sunday, Chinese state media said 261 foreigners were missing in Tibet, including over a hundred Nepalis and others from around the world.

Some are returning to what remained of their homes

In Dhading, one of the worst-hit regions in Nepal, some residents began returning to ruined homes to see what can be salvaged.

Residents sat in homes with walls washed away by the floods, shoveling sludge-like mud and rubble off balconies or window frames. Others scanned the ground for items they could pick out of the mud and rinse off. One man had returned for his chickens, which he found alive. He tied them up and put them in the cabin of his truck.

“Everything is finished. Nothing is left. Not even our home,” Sharmila Tamang, a Dhading resident who was trying to salvage items from her home, told The Associated Press.

At a key power plant that was severely damaged by the floods, workers started inspecting the facilities Sunday to survey the destruction. The plant serves over 20,000 people across four districts.

In the town of Galchhi, a group of residents sought higher ground on a nearby bridge and watched as the river roared by. Some pointed to enormous rocks washed downriver during the earlier floods, while others standing on a suspension bridge were warned off with whistles.

Along the river, homes, vehicles and farm tractors could be seen jutting from the thick gray-brown sediment that enveloped entire villages in some areas. Parts of rice terraces along the riverside had dropped into the river after landslides hit them.

Residents are receiving constant flood warnings

Homes and businesses left intact after the flooding were still without electricity on Sunday, as twisted power line poles and wires lay tangled in the mud.

Residents of flood-hit villages said they were struggling to make sense of near-constant alarms they’ve received since the initial floods.

“Sometimes they say a flood is coming, then we have to run again to higher ground, even at night. There is also rain,” said Govind Shreshta, a resident. “It’s really difficult for me. I have a 72-year-old father and 70-year-old mom. I must carry them and I am exhausted. It’s going on like this for those who are still alive.”

Large concrete and smaller suspension bridges were destroyed, leaving communities on the other side of the river with less easy access.

“Those who are there are now stuck there. Those who are here are stuck here. It’s going to be very difficult,” said Sattan Singh Tamang, 47, who was working near a bridge when Wednesday’s floods came.

Minister says Nepalis have become victims of climate change

Wednesday’s flash floods started after a glacial collapse high in the Himalayan region. Scientists who studied satellite images said bedrock underneath a glacier high in the Himalayan region had collapsed, taking part of the glacier with it. The rockfall was so extreme that it registered as a magnitude 5.2 earthquake.

The rocks and melted water then swelled the rivers in the valleys below, causing a torrent of water that swept buildings, bridges and earth downstream in Tibet and Nepal.

Nepal’s foreign minister called for a global response to climate change, saying Nepal was bearing a disproportionate share of its impact.

“Despite having only 0.1% contribution to the global emissions, people of Nepal have become major victims of climate change,” Shisir Khanal said Saturday.

Scientists have said it is too early to draw a direct connection between global warming and Wednesday’s catastrophe. However, they said that as Earth’s temperature rises because of human activities such as burning oil, gas and coal, the chances of such disasters increase, especially in the Himalayan mountains, which are warming considerably faster than many other parts of the world.

Meanwhile, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said Sunday his country will send a search-and-rescue team to Nepal to assist with relief efforts and help evacuate Malaysians affected by the disaster.

Malaysia has also pledged $1 million in financial aid to Nepal, he said in a statement.

___

Associated Press writers Aijaz Hussain in New Delhi and Shristi Kafle in Kathmandu, Nepal, and video journalist Shonal Ganguly in Dhading, Nepal, contributed to this report.


Floods in Nepal-Tibet disrupt pilgrimage to Mount Kailash, a sacred mountain with centuries of evolving tradition

(The Conversation) — Hindus know it as the dwelling place of Shiva, Tibetan Buddhists as the abode of Demchog, and Jains as the site where Rishabhanatha, their first spiritual teacher, achieved liberation.

A drone view of the aftermath of flash flooding along the Trishuli River in Nuwakot district, Nepal, on Aug. 30, 2026. (AP Photo/Rajesh Kumar Singh)

(The Conversation) — Hundreds of pilgrims traveling to Mount Kailash were among those affected by devastating floods that struck the Nepal–Tibet border on Aug. 26, 2026. The floods destroyed the border crossing most commonly used to reach what is arguably the most revered holy mountain in the world, which sits in the Tibet autonomous region of China.

Colourful prayer flags and a trident, symbolizing the Hindu god Shiva, placed in front of a snow-capped mountain.

Mount Kailash is revered by Hindus, Buddhists and Jains.
Rudolf Thalhammer/Moment via Getty Images

Hindus know the peak as the dwelling place of the god Shiva, Tibetan Buddhists as the abode of the deity Demchok, and Jains as the site where Rishabhanatha, their first spiritual teacher, achieved liberation. Today it also draws nonreligious travelers, who come for the harsh beauty of the landscape and the difficulty of the journey itself. Pilgrims and travelers do not climb Kailash. Instead, they walk a path roughly 33 miles around its base, which many believe to provide blessings and purification.

The legend of Kailash goes back thousands of years, to ancient Indian traditions describing a mountain at the center of the universe. But for most of that history, the Kailash of Indian literature was not associated with the peak that pilgrims travel to now.

In 2025, I published a book about Tibetan pilgrimage to Kailash. While researching it, I learned that it took centuries for a mythical mountain to become identified with this particular peak in western Tibet.

Kailash as legend

Indian religious texts describe a range of snowy mountains to the north called the Himalaya, or “abode of snows.” Beyond them, Indian cosmologies described a cosmic mountain called Meru, believed to stand at the center of the world.

The historian Alex McKay writes that the earliest mentions of a mountain named Kailash – Kailasa in Sanskrit – appear in the Hindu epics, composed roughly between the 4th century B.C.E. and the 4th century C.E.

In the “Ramayana,” an epic recounting of the god-king Rama’s search for his abducted wife, the monkey king Sugriva describes the far-off north, including Mount Kailash and Mount Meru. In the “Mahabharata,” an epic of dynastic war, the prince Arjuna visits a hermitage located on Mount Kailash.

However, these epics do not provide a specific location for Kailash. They portray it as a forbidding mountain realm of sages and gods, not as a pilgrimage destination for humans. The Mahabharata lists sacred places pilgrims should visit – sites across northern and western India – but Kailash is not among them. In fact, the epic states repeatedly that mere mortals cannot travel to the Himalayas.

It is in the “Puranas,” a body of Hindu religious texts composed between roughly the 3rd and 10th centuries, that Kailash is described as the abode of Shiva. The Puranas also begin to describe Kailash as the earthly form of the divine Meru. But it is still not a place of pilgrimage and still not fixed to a particular point on the map.

Kailash as physical place

A snow-capped mountain rises among a range of peaks, with Buddhist prayer flags lining the path leading toward it.

An image showing Mount Kailash in the Ngari Prefecture of Tibet.
Yongxin Wang/iStock / Getty Images Plus

Eventually, though scholars do not know exactly when, local traditions in North India began to identify particular peaks as Kailash. At least five different mountains, in the states of Jammu, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, have been claimed as the Kailash, and local pilgrimage to them continues today.

As Buddhism spread from India to Tibet beginning in the 7th century, Tibetans inherited Buddhist scriptures that spoke of Meru, Kailash and other sacred mountains. They also had their own long-standing practices of mountain veneration, making offerings to mountains that were believed to be the homes of local deities. Among them was the mountain now known as Kailash in western Tibet.

A mountain claimed

Tibetan traditions record that the geographical site of Kailash was claimed by practitioners of more than one religious tradition, and that the 11th-century saint Milarepa converted it to being a Buddhist site after defeating a non-Buddhist rival in a contest of magical power.

In the centuries that followed, Kailash became known as a particularly auspicious place to meditate and to visit on pilgrimage. Tibetans believed that while the mountain was the dwelling place of the deity Demchok, its true nature was only visible to the spiritually advanced. Any pilgrim who visited Kailash, known to Tibetans as Gang Rinpoche, would obtain blessings.

Even in Tibet, however, Kailash was only one pilgrimage site among many. Far more pilgrims visited the capital city of Lhasa.

The first clear reference to Indian Hindu pilgrims visiting the Tibetan Kailash comes in 1670, according to McKay, although earlier visits are possible. Its identity as the Kailash was not fully settled until the Indian subcontinent came under British colonial rule in the 19th century. Geographic surveyors mapping the border regions traced the sources of rivers such as the Indus to areas near Kailash. This matched ancient descriptions of Kailash as giving rise to rivers, and so the identification stuck.

By the 19th century, a small but steady flow of pilgrims traveled from India and Nepal, usually alongside the trade caravans crossing the Himalayan passes.

A pilgrimage closed and reopened

After China asserted control over Tibet in 1950, China and India negotiated official pilgrimage routes in a 1954 agreement. That arrangement did not last long. In 1959, a Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule was suppressed, and the Dalai Lama – the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism – fled to India; religious life inside Tibet was severely restricted in the following years. In 1962, India and China fought a war over their disputed border, after which the border closed to Indian pilgrims for nearly two decades.

Routes reopened in 1981, and Tibetans were permitted to resume pilgrimage as well. But since then many Tibetans have found it difficult to obtain the necessary permits, and others have criticized excessive construction of hotels and roads at Kailash.

Most pilgrims today travel with private tour companies. Demand this year ran well above the Chinese government’s quota of 24,000 permits for Indian pilgrims. The Indian government also sponsors an official pilgrimage, with participants chosen by lottery, but places are limited to 1,000 people. Pilgrimage by Indian travelers had reopened only in 2025, after being suspended since 2020 because of COVID-19 and a deadly clash between Indian and Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley over the still-disputed India-China border.

Today, Kailash receives more pilgrims than at any point in its history. Most travelers from India now fly to Kathmandu and continue by bus through Gyirong, a road crossing between Nepal and Tibet that was expanded in 2014 and opened to international travelers in 2017. It became the most popular route after the 2015 earthquake damaged the main alternative. It was this crossing that the August 26 floods destroyed.

(Catherine Hartmann, Associate Professor of Religious Studies, University of Wyoming. The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)