Friday, May 09, 2025

UK

Boycotting Israeli Products – Our Campaign to get the Co-op to do the Right Thing


“The Co-op was one of the very first retailers to boycott Russian products… Yet, it has refused to take similar action during the 580 days (and counting) of Israel’s bombardment and total destruction of Gaza.”

By Paul Neill, Palestine Solidarity Campaign

There have been ongoing campaigns over many years aimed at persuading supermarket shoppers to stop buying Israeli products. These have had limited success, and you will still find plenty of Israeli avocados, hummus, and even potatoes and carrots on the shelves of your local Tesco or Sainsbury’s.

I am one of a small group of Palestine solidarity activists in West Yorkshire, who want to go further and have led a campaign to get a supermarket – the Co-op – to boycott Israeli products. We have submitted Motion 13, an individual members’ motion signed by Co-op members across the UK, to the Co-op’s 2025 AGM, asking them “to demonstrate fairness and consistency in its ethical decision-making, and cease all trading with Israel.”

The Co-op was one of the very first retailers to boycott Russian products, exactly seven days into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, stating that “In response to the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces and as a sign of solidarity with the people of Ukraine, we have taken the decision to remove from sale Russian-made vodka.” Yet, it has refused to take similar action during the 580 days (and counting) of Israel’s bombardment and total destruction of Gaza.

Three of the most respected human rights organisations – Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, and Médecins Sans Frontières – have produced reports that conclude that Israel has committed genocide. The International Criminal Court has issued international arrest warrants for the Prime Minister and Former Defence Minister of Israel for ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’. We can add forced starvation and ethnic cleansing in Gaza to the list of war crimes committed by Israel since we submitted our motion to the Co-op in early March.

To their credit, the Co-op no longer sources products that are believed to come from the illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. We would argue, however, that to continue to buy products from the country that created the settlements and continues to expand them makes no sense from an ethical point of view. This is a permanent occupation. The International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel’s laws in the occupied territories are “tantamount to apartheid”.

  • There are now 700,000 illegal settlers on Palestinian land and Israel has announced plans to build nearly 1200 more settler homes in 2025;
  • There are two systems of law – Israeli settlers are subject to civilian law, Palestinians to military law;
  • Israel controls all water supplies in the West Bank. Only 36% of Palestinians receive running water every day, and settlers use 3 times more water per person than Palestinians. Many Palestinian communities have to buy water to make up for the shortfall in supply or because Israel nearly always refuses requests to drill water wells or connect to the mains supply;
  • Armed settlers, protected by the Israeli military, are free to roam outside their settlements:
    • to graze their flocks on Palestinian farmland;
    • to burn swathes of Palestinian agricultural land and, to date, destroy 800,000 olive trees;
    • routinely attack Palestinian communities, killing and injuring civilians, and burning down homes. These attacks have increased by 30% in the first 3 months of 2025;

Israel has pursued a long-term policy of ethnic cleansing in the occupied territories. In 2024, nearly 1800 Palestinian-owned buildings were demolished and, since January 2025, 40,000 Palestinians have been forcibly expelled from three refugee camps in the West Bank, with the army instructed to stay in the camps for the next year “to prevent the return of residents”.

The Co-op, as part of the wider co-operative movement, has a proud history as an ethical organisation. It is, to use the business jargon, one of its ‘unique selling points’ as a high street supermarket and why many of its 5.5 million members joined the Co-op. It clearly felt there was a moral imperative that required them to stop trading with Russia. We can think of no greater moral imperative than to oppose Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its military occupation and apartheid regime in the Occupied Territories.

The Co-op states that “We’re run by our members. And when you’re owned by the people, you can do right by the people.” It has an opportunity to do right by its members and be on the right side of history by, as our motion states, showing “moral courage and leadership” on this issue.

Any Co-op member who spent more than £100 in 2024 is eligible to vote at the AGM, and should have received an email or postal pack in the past 2-3 weeks inviting them to vote online by noon on 12th May 2025 or in person at the AGM on 17th May 2025. Motion 13, along with the Co-op Board’s response to it, can be found here.

A simple majority is required to pass the motion. A decisive vote in favour of Motion 13 could lead to the Co-op being the first high street supermarket to stop selling Israeli goods, which would be a huge victory for the wider Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.


  • Paul Neill is one of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign activists involved in getting the motion tabled at the Co-op’s AGM.
  • The Palestine Solidarity Campaign are holding a National Demo on the 77th anniversary of the 1948 Nakba, to demand that the Government take action to end the ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestine. The demo is assembling at Embankment Tube, London on 17th May from 12PM.
  • You can follow the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) on Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram and Bluesky


Palestine Solidarity: United, Defiant, Focused

“The sheer scale of what Palestine has endured so far & its uncertain future can have a numbing effect on those contemplating it… The only antidote to despair is to get involved.”

By Leila Ryan

Following the International Court of Justice’s finding that Israel’s collective punishment of Gaza amounts to plausible genocide, the International Criminal Court, last November, issued unprecedented arrest warrants for Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defence minister Yoav Gallant. Neither has yet been detained and they are clearly expecting friends in high places will shield them from justice.

Complicity with Israel

The genocidal onslaught lasted from 8 October 2023 to 19 January 2025, the day before their most powerful friend, President Trump, was inaugurated in Washington. The subsequent ceasefire could have been agreed as early as May 2024 had Netanyahu and his Western backers not preferred ongoing genocide instead.

At the time of writing (4 March 2025), Israel and its US sponsor seem to be bringing the ceasefire to an abrupt end, opening the way to the completion of the genocide either by resuming direct military assaults or doubling down on the other war crimes of starving Gazans into submission and forcing them off their land.

Israel’s genocidal actions from October 2023 to early 2025 were so dependent on Western military, diplomatic and propaganda cover that the US, Britain, Canada, Australia, Germany, the Netherlands (and possibly other countries) amply deserve prosecution alongside Israel itself, even if some alternative strategy – or renewed global outrage – halted the genocide altogether. 

There should also be room in the dock for Poland, which has NATO’s biggest army in Europe. On 27 January 2025 (Holocaust Remembrance Day), in a serious case of obstructing the course of justice, the Polish government gave Netanyahu immunity from arrest so he could attend the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. By inviting Netanyahu, the butcher of Gaza, the Polish government insulted the memory of the nearly 47,000 Palestinians killed up to that time in the Gaza genocide. As if that were not insulting enough, it also failed to invite any Russian representative to the anniversary event, thereby also insulting the memory of the 600,000 Soviet Red Army troops who gave their lives freeing Poland from Nazi invaders and liberating Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1945.

Accountability for genocide

The Gaza genocide was the most intense and large-scale slaughter and displacement of Palestinians since the original Nakba (“catastrophe”) or ethnic cleansing, on which Israel was founded as a settler colony back in 1948. The global and almost 24/7 coverage of what Israel did to Gaza in 2023-2025 makes it the first genocide to be live streamed on social media. It cannot now be wiped from the collective memory of mankind. 

Those responsible for any state’s complicity with genocidal Israel are now being targeted in campaigns by their fellow citizens and others. Beyond and within nation-states, transnational corporations and public bodies will be coming under closer scrutiny than ever for evidence of complicity with apartheid at best and genocide and other war crimes at worst.

The ICC’s evidence against prominent perpetrators Netanyahu and Gallant is already in the public domain but others are also being pursued. Campaigners in Belgium are seeking posthumous justice for six-year-old schoolgirl Hind Rajab, who witnessed the deaths of five of her family before her own last moments were recorded in a phone call for help to a medical aid worker. The family had been fleeing south by car from Gaza City on 29 January 2024. They were slaughtered by potentially identifiable members of Israeli ground forces. Other activists in Brazil and Sweden, for example, are pursuing further cases in which recorded evidence shows Israeli soldiers breaking international or humanitarian law.

Although Israel gives its citizens in the IDF impunity from prosecution, the activists hope that where an accused soldier has dual nationality, a non-Israeli jurisdiction may permit a formal trial. If that happens, at least some of the truth about its conduct, which Israel’s prohibition on media access to Gaza during the genocide was meant to restrict, will at last be made public.

Even before his inauguration, President Trump had begun defunding UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East. He also explicitly proposed the ethnic cleansing of Gaza – a war crime – which he declared the US would then take over. Simultaneously, his administration is encouraging the intensified repression and further illegal settlement expansion already underway in the West Bank.

A people united still undefeated

The terror already unleashed on Gaza has failed in its declared objective of destroying the resistance. Neither has it broken the spirit of Gazans or Palestinians as a whole.

The sheer scale and intensity of what Palestine has endured so far and its uncertain future can have a numbing effect on those contemplating it (or averting their eyes from TV coverage of the carnage or its after effects). Yet millions who in their own lifetimes knew neither the horrors of South African apartheid nor the satisfaction of helping defeat it now know enough about Israeli apartheid to be ready, in growing numbers, to help dismantle it.

The only antidote to despair is to get involved. The rest of this article will therefore consider some of the plans recently announced by the main body organising solidarity with Palestinians.

Palestine Solidarity Campaign

After a year of unprecedented growth in activity and membership, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) held its packed annual general meeting in London on 1 February 2025.  The AGM featured lively debate but impressive self-discipline and unity of purpose. One issue likely to resurface, as the UN and other international bodies, and civil society solidarity, all have a role in ending Israeli apartheid, is how these forums of action can best work together. The recognition of Palestine as a state (whatever the ultimate form of that state, to be determined by the Palestinians themselves) currently divides PSC members even though most countries officially recognise it (shown in green on this map).  

Trade union links

Building on past successes in winning commitment to Palestine from union executives and conferences, above all at last year’s TUC, a programme of activities is planned to encourage further support throughout union structures and in workplaces as well. Workers experiencing falling living standards will become increasingly aware that potential restrictions on the right to protest about Israel can also be used against those taking industrial action.

Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions

At the heart of PSC’s campaigning work for 2025 is a strategic expansion and intensification of boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaigns against Israel and its accomplices – the flexible, coherent, realistic, manageable and monitored approach launched by the Palestinian-led BDS national committee back in 2005, and which has proved itself ever since with a growing list of successes, each building on those that came before.

It was especially appropriate, therefore, that guest speaker Omar Barghouti, perhaps the best-known founder of the BDS movement and its most eminent champion, reminded those present how BDS is geared to the overall Palestinian demands for freedom, equality and justice, and is an opportunity to popularise the cause of Palestinian self-determination.

The AGM heard of a new decision to add Coca-Cola to PSC’s existing portfolio of apartheid-complicit targets; the company’s welcome vulnerability on this issue is suggested by how its sales have plummeted in the Middle East since the start of the genocide. It would once have been unthinkable to take on a well-resourced behemoth like Coca-Cola, so this is a sign of how things are changing. (Since there was no Coca-Cola nor even Pepsi available at the AGM’s buffet lunch, delegates happily drank Palestinian owned Gaza Cola, or Cola Gaza, instead).

Barclays’ bad habit

Pressure will also be increased on savers and investors to withdraw their accounts from Barclays Bank, which helps finance the arms trade with Israel in violation of international law.

The bank was once a major corporate prop of white minority rule in South Africa and only later admitted how the anti-apartheid movement’s successful campaign for students to close their accounts had rattled its London board. The thinking behind the boycott was that, at least in those days, students going to college opened bank accounts and tended to stick to the same provider after graduating and perhaps for the rest of their lives. There was therefore sharp competition between rival banks to get students to sign up with them. No wonder Barclays were dismayed to find existing student customers, disgusted by the bank’s complicity with South African apartheid, closing their accounts and switching to a non-complicit competitor. Perhaps a new push on behalf of Palestine will help Barclays finally kick its bad habit of underwriting apartheid regimes.

“Every Little Helps” (Thank you, Tesco)

Another echo from the past is the successful boycott of South African apartheid produce. The PSC executive and delegates enthusiastically endorsed the idea of a simple leaflet aimed at supermarket shoppers that will list the most common Israeli products to avoid buying and suggest more ethical alternatives. This harks back to the still-widely remembered boycott of Outspan oranges, which encouraged a convenient and eventually habitual token of support for the victims of apartheid while doing little more than the weekly shop. This campaign was never likely nor intended to undermine apartheid all on its own, nor did shoppers expect it to; but who knows what its cumulative effect may have been? 

Yet many people expressed themselves in this modest way, signalling (even if only to themselves) whose side they were on – a private gesture for which you don’t even need to be an activist. Those arguing for something similar now guess that Israel’s reputation among the general public has fallen so far that such an idea might well catch on again. We shall see. It’s not clear if Jaffa oranges will make it onto such a list, but if they do, shoppers might be reminded that boycotting Outspan helped bury one kind of apartheid and doing the same to Jaffa could help bury another. 

Next steps

In mid-January 2025, some commentators, including London Mayor Sadiq Khan, naively declared that the imminent ceasefire in Gaza meant demonstrations for Palestine should end. If the Mayor thought a ceasefire, especially one as curtailed as Israel now seems to think it can get away with, was all that Palestinians could hope for, or would clear marchers from London’s streets, he was predictably mistaken. Moreover, the failure of attempts over the following few days to demonise or criminalise pro-Palestinian demonstrations, especially one in London on 18 January 2025 opposing the BBC’s bias against Palestinians, has strengthened the resolve of the solidarity movement to continue its actions unintimidated by genocide apologists. 

At its AGM, PSC Director Ben Jamal gave a defiant answer to Sadiq Khan and his fellow critics: the solidarity movement will never be silent until every Palestinian, wherever they are, has the right to return to a free Palestine.  


Groundbreaking report reveals extraordinary scale of UK arms exports to Israel and finds that the Government has misled the public 


MAY 9, 2025

A groundbreaking new report reveals for the first time the extraordinary scale of UK arms exports to Israel. It uses new data from the Israel Tax Authority, andconcludes that “it appears that Foreign Secretary David Lammy has misled Parliament and the public about arms shipments to Israel.”

Former Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell MP and Zarah Sultana MP are calling on Keir Starmer to launch an investigation into evidence in the report that Ministers have misled Parliament and the public. They say that if the Ministerial Code has been breached by David Lammy or any other Minister, this is a “resigning matter”. 

The joint report by the Palestinian Youth Movement, the Progressive International and Workers for a Free Palestine reveals a total of over 160,000 military goods exported from the UK to Israel since the war on Gaza began in October 2023. This new evidence of thousands of shipments of military goods, munitions of war, arms and aircraft parts comes as Israel’s Cabinet approves Netanyahu’s plans to annex Gaza, which threatens to ethnically cleanse the land, with Minister Smotrich vowing “Gaza will be entirely destroyed”.

“Untrue and misleading”

David Lammy has stated in the House of Commons that “much of what we send [to Israel] is defensive in nature” such as “helmet[s] or goggles”, and “not what we describe routinely as arms”. However, the report shows the UK has sent thousands of goods to Israel which are defined as arms and ammunition, going far beyond helmets and goggles, finding that Lammy’s suggestions to the contrary in the House are “untrue and misleading”. 

Most of the shipments occurred after the UK government’s suspension of around 30 arms export licences to Israel in September 2024. The UK sent 8,630 separate munitions since the suspensions took effect, all in the category ‘Bombs, Grenades, Torpedoes, Mines, Missiles And Similar Munitions Of War And Parts Thereof – Other’.

The report finds that the pattern of UK-Israel courier shipments of aircraft parts is unchanged despite the official ban on direct export of components of F-35 jets – the world’s most advanced fighter jets – announced by Keir Starmer and David Lammy in September 2024.

Despite David Lammy, Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds MP and other Ministers repeatedly reiterating in the House of Commons that the Government has ended this direct supply of F-35 parts, the evidence indicates that they have continued to send direct shipments of components for lethal F-35 jets to Israel after September 2024 — and that these shipments are ongoing. 

The report finds that on the basis of this evidence, it appearsDavid Lammy and other Ministers have misled Parliament and the public in their statements in the House.

When announcing the official ban, the Government stated that the direct supply of F-35 parts would present a “clear risk” of contributing to Israel’s violations of international law. The report states that, by the Government’s own admission, this continued direct supply puts Britain at “clear risk” of enabling Israel’s violations of international law and therefore breaching the UK’s obligations under international law. 

This comes ahead of legal action against the Government in the High Court on Monday 12th May, which will challenge the legality of its arms exports to IsraelThe findings of this report are directly relevant to next week’s High Court proceedings.Following the report’s publication, activists will target the Foreign Office at 18:00 on Friday 9th May in a protest calling on David Lammy to resign and demanding that the UK end all arms exports to Israel.

Complicity in war crimes?

Commenting on the revelations in the report, former Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell MP said: “The Government has a lot of explaining to do –  and fast, in response to this groundbreaking report, particularly following the allegation that David Lammy and other Ministers have misled Parliament and the public. If Parliament has been misled by the Foreign Secretary or any Minister, it is a resigning matter and more importantly it attracts potentially a charge of complicity in war crimes.

“The Government has shrouded its arms supplies to Israel in secrecy. They must finally come clean in response to this extremely concerning evidence and halt all British arms exports to Israel to ensure no British made weapons are used in Netanyahu’s new and terrifying plans to annex the Gaza Strip and ethnically cleanse the land.”

Zarah Sultana, Labour MP for Coventry South, said: “This explosive report shows the Government has been lying to us about the arms it is supplying to Israel while it wages genocide in Gaza. Far from ‘helmets and goggles’, the Government has been sending thousands of arms and ammunition goods and is even still supplying components of the world’s most lethal fighter jets. By the Government’s own admission, continued direct supply of F-35 parts to Israel would put Britain at ‘clear risk’ of contributing to Israel’s violations of international law and therefore breaching our own legal obligations.

“This report alleges that David Lammy has misled Parliament and the public, which would be a clear breach of the Ministerial Code. Keir Starmer must immediately launch a full investigation into these alleged breaches of the Ministerial Code and if David Lammy or any other Minister has breached the code, they must resign. Moreover, an independent inquiry is required into this damning new evidence that the Government has breached the UK’s obligations under international law, making the British Government, and potentially individual Ministers, complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

“This new evidence reinforces the significant likelihood that British-made weapons are being used to kill Palestinians as we speak, and that they will be used to enact Netanyahu’s plans to annex Gaza and ethnically cleanse Palestinians, which would make the British Government, and individual Ministers, complicit in these war crimes of historic magnitude. Keir Starmer must act immediately to impose an arms embargo and ensure the UK does not enable Netanyahu’s unspeakably evil and illegal plans.”

Jeremy Corbyn, former Leader of the Labour Party and independent MP said: “The government is yet to respond to our call for a full, public inquiry into the UK’s role in Israel’s military assault in Gaza. This shocking report could explain why. When will the UK government come clean about the reality of military cooperation with Israel? The public deserves to know the full scale of the UK’s complicity in crimes against humanity – and we are not going anywhere until we have established the truth.”

Legal expert Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court Chambers, said: “The information contained in the report suggests that a staggering 160,000 military items have been sent from the UK to Israel from October 2023 to March 2025. The UK must urgently lift the cloak of secrecy around exports to Israel and end its complicity with Israeli violations of international law. Urgent questions need to be answered about the apparent contradictions between its public position and the information set out in this report, which suggests that the UK is continuing to directly supply Israel with parts for advanced F-35 jets which have caused such devastation to Gaza. This would be a clear violation of the UK’s obligations under international law.

“The advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the Israeli occupation in July 2024 and its repeated orders in South Africa v Israel have made the UK’s legal obligations crystal clear. It must not render any aid or assistance to Israel which relates to its illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territories, and must indeed go further by taking all reasonable steps to prevent Israel’s ongoing genocide and to fulfil its obligation to ensure that Israel ceases its ongoing breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

“Continued exports to Israel are likely to raise both individual criminal liability and state liability for the UK under the Genocide Convention. It is past time for the UK to fulfil its obligations under international law:  it should impose a full arms embargo on Israel, halt all exports and transfers, including of dual-use and so-called ‘non-offensive’ items that could be used against the Palestinian population under occupation.”

A spokesperson for the Palestinian Youth Movement said:“These findings prove what we long suspected: the British Government has been lying to Parliament and the public in an attempt to cover up its complicity in the genocide of our people. But while the Government enables the flow of weapons for war and ethnic cleansing, poll after poll shows the British people stand with Gaza and are demanding a ban on arms to Israel. Our movement will continue to build pressure and use this new evidence to escalate our tactics, working with workers, trade unionists, students, and community groups across the country to enact a people’s arms embargo and end Britain’s collaboration in the genocide.”

Workers take action

A spokesperson for Workers for a Free Palestine added:“These shipments must be stopped. Over the past few weeks, we have seen workers in France and Morocco take action to halt the transfer of F-35 parts to Israel on Maersk ships. Their brave actions serve as a reminder of the power we have as workers to intervene in the supply chain of genocide. The ongoing British complicity outlined in these findings comes with an urgent duty to take action and enforce an arms embargo on Israel from below.”

Over 250 global organisations including Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International UK have called on the UK and other countries which supply F-35 parts to Israel to immediately halt both the indirect and direct transfer of F-35 components to Israel. A UN report in June 2024 identified bombs carried by F-35s as having been used in “emblematic” cases of indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks on Gaza which “led to high numbers of civilian fatalities and widespread destruction of civilian objects”.

The full report is available to read and download online.

Activists will target the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office at 18:00 on Friday 9th May demanding that the UK end all arms exports to Israel and calling on David Lammy to resign. 

Image; c/o Labour Hub

Groundbreaking report finds Lammy has misled public & reveals scale of UK arms exports to Israel

“It appears David Lammy & other Ministers have misled Parliament and the public in their statements in the House.”

By Progressive International

A groundbreaking new report reveals for the first time the extraordinary scale of UK arms exports to Israel using new data from the Israel Tax Authority, and concludes that “it appears that Foreign Secretary David Lammy has misled Parliament and the public about arms shipments to Israel”.

Former Labour Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell MP and Zarah Sultana MP are calling on Keir Starmer to launch an investigation into evidence in the report that Ministers have misled Parliament and the public, saying that, if the Ministerial Code has been breached by David Lammy or any other Minister, this is a “resigning matter”. 

The joint report by the Palestinian Youth Movement, the Progressive International and Workers for a Free Palestine reveals a total of over 160,000 military goods exported from the UK to Israel since the war on Gaza began in October 2023. This new evidence of thousands of shipments of military goods, munitions of war, arms, and aircraft parts comes as Israel’s Cabinet approves Netanyahu’s plans to annex Gaza, which threatens to ethnically cleanse the land, with Minister Smotrich vowing “Gaza will be entirely destroyed”.

David Lammy has stated in the House of Commons that “much of what we send [to Israel] is defensive in nature” such as “helmet[s] or goggles”, and “not what we describe routinely as arms”. However, the report shows the UK has sent thousands of goods to Israel which are defined as arms and ammunition, going far beyond helmets and goggles, finding that Lammy’s suggestions to the contrary in the House are “untrue and misleading”. 

Most of the shipments occurred after the UK government’s suspension of around 30 arms export licences to Israel in September 2024, with the UK sending 8,630 separate munitions since the suspensions took effect, all in the category ‘Bombs, Grenades, Torpedoes, Mines, Missiles And Similar Munitions Of War And Parts Thereof – Other’.

The report finds that the pattern of UK-Israel courier shipments of aircraft parts is unchanged despite the official ban on direct export of components of F-35 jets – the world’s most advanced fighter jets – announced by Keir Starmer and David Lammy in September 2024.

Despite David Lammy, Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds MP and other Ministers repeatedly reiterating in the House of Commons that the Government has ended this direct supply of F-35 parts, the evidence indicates that they have continued to send direct shipments of components for lethal F-35 jets to Israel after September 2024 — and that these shipments are ongoing. 

The report finds that on the basis of this evidence, it appears David Lammy and other Ministers have misled Parliament and the public in their statements in the House.

When announcing the official ban, the Government stated that the direct supply of F-35 parts would present a ‘clear risk’ of contributing to Israel’s violations of international law. The report states that, by the Government’s own admission, this continued direct supply puts Britain at ‘clear risk’ of enabling Israel’s violations of international law and therefore breaching the UK’s obligations under international law. 

This comes ahead of legal action against the Government in the High Court on Monday 12 May, which will challenge the legality of its arms exports to Israel. The findings of this report are directly relevant to next week’s High Court proceedings. Following the report’s publication, activists will target the Foreign Office at 18:00 on Friday 9 May in a protest calling on David Lammy to resign and demanding that the UK end all arms exports to Israel.

Commenting on the revelations in the report, former Labour Shadow Chancellor and elected Labour MP John McDonnell said:

“The Government has a lot of explaining to do and fast in response to this groundbreaking report, particularly following the allegation that David Lammy and other Ministers have misled Parliament and the public. If Parliament has been misled by the Foreign Secretary or any minister it is a resigning matter and more importantly it attracts potentially a charge of complicity in war crimes. The Government has shrouded its arms supplies to Israel in secrecy. They must finally come clean in response to this extremely concerning evidence and halt all British arms exports to Israel to ensure no British made weapons are used in Netanyahu’s new and terrifying plans to annex the Gaza Strip and ethnically cleanse the land.”

Zarah Sultana, elected Labour MP for Coventry South, said: 

“This explosive report shows the Government has been lying to us about the arms it is supplying to Israel while it wages genocide in Gaza. Far from “helmets and goggles”, the Government has been sending thousands of arms and ammunition goods and even still supplying components of the world’s most lethal fighter jets. By the Government’s own admission, continued direct supply of F-35 parts to Israel would put Britain at ‘clear risk’ of contributing to Israel’s violations of international law and therefore breaching our own legal obligations.

“This report alleges that David Lammy has misled Parliament and the public, which would be a clear breach of the Ministerial Code. Keir Starmer must immediately launch a full investigation into these alleged breaches of the Ministerial Code and if David Lammy or any other Minister has breached the code, they must resign. Moreover, an independent inquiry is required into this damning new evidence that the Government has breached the UK’s obligations under international law, making the British Government, and potentially individual Ministers, complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

“This new evidence reinforces the significant likelihood that British-made weapons are being used to kill Palestinians as we speak, and that they will be used to enact Netanyahu’s plans to annex Gaza and ethnically cleanse Palestinians, which would make the British Government, and individual Ministers, complicit in these war crimes of historic magnitude. Keir Starmer must act immediately to impose an arms embargo and ensure the UK does not enable Netanyahu’s unspeakably evil and illegal plans.”

Jeremy Corbyn, former Leader of the Labour Party and independent MP said: 

“The government is yet to respond to our call for a full, public inquiry into the UK’s role in Israel’s military assault in Gaza. This shocking report could explain why. When will the UK government come clean about the reality of military cooperation with Israel? The public deserves to know the full scale of the UK’s complicity in crimes against humanity – and we are not going anywhere until we have established the truth.”

Legal expert Pete Weatherby KC, Garden Court Chambers, said: 

“The information contained in the report suggests that a staggering 160,000 military items have been sent from the UK to Israel from October 2023 to March 2025. The UK must urgently lift the cloak of secrecy around exports to Israel and end its complicity with Israeli violations of international law. Urgent questions need to be answered about the apparent contradictions between its public position and the information set out in this report, which suggests that the UK is continuing to directly supply Israel with parts for advanced F-35 jets which have caused such devastation to Gaza. This would be a clear violation of the UK’s obligations under international law.

“The advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the Israeli occupation in July 2024 and its repeated orders in South Africa v Israel have made the UK’s legal obligations crystal clear. It must not render any aid or assistance to Israel which relates to its illegal occupation of the Palestinian Territories, and must indeed go further by taking all reasonable steps to prevent Israel’s ongoing genocide and to fulfil its obligation to ensure that Israel ceases its ongoing breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

“Continued exports to Israel are likely to raise both individual criminal liability and state liability for the UK under the Genocide Convention. It is past time for the UK to fulfil its obligations under international law:  it should impose a full arms embargo on Israel, halt all exports and transfers, including of dual-use and so-called ‘non-offensive’ items that could be used against the Palestinian population under occupation.”

A spokesperson for the Palestinian Youth Movement said: “These findings prove what we long suspected: the British Government has been lying to Parliament and the public in an attempt to cover up its complicity in the genocide of our people. But while the Government enables the flow of weapons for war and ethnic cleansing, poll after poll shows the British people stand with Gaza and are demanding a ban on arms to Israel. Our movement will continue to build pressure and use this new evidence to escalate our tactics, working with workers, trade unionists, students, and community groups across the country to enact a people’s arms embargo and end Britain’s collaboration in the genocide.”

A spokesperson for Workers for a Free Palestine added: “These shipments must be stopped. Over the past few weeks, we have seen workers in France and Morocco take action to halt the transfer of F-35 parts to Israel on Maersk ships. Their brave actions serve as a reminder of the power we have as workers to intervene in the supply chain of genocide. The ongoing British complicity outlined in these findings comes with an urgent duty to take action and enforce an arms embargo on Israel from below.”


  • The full report is available to read and download online.
  • Activists will target the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office at 18:00 on Friday 9 May demanding that the UK end all arms exports to Israel and calling on David Lammy to resign. 
  • If you support Labour Outlook’s work amplifying the voices of left movements and struggles here and internationally, please consider becoming a supporter on Patreon.

Keir Starmer called out for ‘denying facts’ about Israel’s destruction of Palestine


Yesterday
Left Foot Forward

Starmer told Shockat Adam MP: “Most of what he says is simply not right”. Was that true?




Keir Starmer has been called out for denying facts about Israel’s destruction of Gaza.

During Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday, Independent MP Shockat Adam, said: “This week, the Israeli government approved a plan to officially conquer Gaza.”

He added that Minister Smotrich declared yesterday that Gaza would be destroyed and Palestinians will have to leave for third countries.

Adam said: “This comes at the end of the extermination of over 50,000 Palestinian men, women and children and at the same time simultaneous expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank.”

He then asked if the Prime Minister would acknowledge ethnic cleansing Israel is carrying out and end UK military cooperation with Israel, including providing F-35 fighter jet parts.

“Or will he make Britain complicit in war crimes and be the Prime Minister to answer at The Hague?,” he said.

In response, Starmer said: “Mr Speaker, most of what he says is simply not right”, before giving a brief statement on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank.

Regarding Adam’s comment about F-35 fighter jet parts, the government stopped direct exports of the parts to Israel in September. However, there is a loophole whereby spare F-35 parts can still enter Israel if they go via another country such as the US.

On the PoliticsJOE podcast, presenters fact-checked Adam’s claims and found they were accurate. They also challenged Starmer’s dismissal as disingenuous.

PoliticsJOE presenter Ed Campbell said: “What parts there are incorrect? Like it’s so disingenuous to just lie about this.”

The government is facing mounting pressure from MPs to impose sanctions on Israel and halt arms exports.

During a ministerial statement on Tuesday, Labour MP Clive Betts said to Minister for the Middle East, Hamish Falconer: “I agree with the Minister’s comments and condemnation of Israel’s actions in Gaza.”

“The problem is that I have agreed with him every time he has made these condemnations of Israel, and the whole House generally has joined him in that, but the reality is that Israel is taking absolutely no notice of the Government’s position.”

Betts then called on the government to rapidly recognise a Palestinian state and “seriously consider sanctions against Israel”.

In a post on X yesterday, Jeremy Corbyn said: “It’s quite simple.

“You cannot say you oppose Israel’s plan for the mass ethnic cleansing of Gaza if you keep providing them with the weapons they need to carry it out.

“The government’s refusal to end all arms sales to Israel is becoming more egregious by the day.”

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward



Even Tory MPs are now calling on the government to recognise a Palestinian state


Chris Jarvis 
MAY 7, 2025
Left Foot Forward


"Recognising Palestine would affirm our nation’s commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights."



Seven Tory MPs have called for the government to recognise a Palestinian state. They, alongside six Tory peers have written to the prime minister Keir Starmer making the call in advance of UN talks next month.

According to a report in the Guardian, the group of Tory parliamentarians wrote to Starmer in March following Israel breaking the ceasefire in Gaza.

In their letter, the MPs and peers wrote: “For decades, the Palestinian people have endured occupation, displacement and systemic restrictions on their basic freedoms.

“Recognising Palestine would affirm our nation’s commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights. It would send a clear message that Britain stands against indefinite occupation and supports the Palestinian people’s legitimate aspirations.”

The MPs who signed the letter were Kit Malthouse, Simon Hoare, Desmond Swayne, John Hayes and Edward Leigh. Among the peers to sign the letter were Hugo Swire, Nicholas Soames and Patricia Morris.

Their letter continued: “Recognition should not be treated as a distant bargaining chip but as a necessary step to reinforce international law and diplomacy. Prime minister, we stand ready to offer our public support for this decision.

“This is an opportunity for Britain to show leadership, to be on the right side of history and to uphold the principles we claim to champion. More than 140 UN member states have already recognised Palestine – it is time for the United Kingdom to do the same.”

The Labour government has made a commitment to recognise a Palestinian state but has not yet done so.

According to the Guardian, a spokesperson for the Conservative Party said of the letter: “Our longstanding position has been that we will recognise a Palestinian state at a time that is most conducive to the peace process. We are not at that point now and we are clear that recognition cannot be the start of the process.”

Chris Jarvis is head of strategy and development at Left Foot Forward

Image credit: Scotgunn – Creative Commons


 

Welfare not Warfare! Tackling Spiralling Military Spending in the UK and Around the World


“Redirecting funds from welfare and aid programs to military spending will inevitably exacerbate existing social inequalities and globally will only increase instability.”

By Russell Whiting, Global Campaign on Military Spending

In her Spring Statement last month, Rachel Reeves unveiled plans to increase core military spending to £62.2 billion for the 2025-26 financial year, an increase of £2.2 billion from what was already one of the highest global figures. This escalation lays the groundwork for Keir Starmer’s previous announcement that military expenditure will hit 2.5% of GDP by 2027-28, with some already saying that the future figure may need to reach 3.5%. However, this surge in military funding comes at the expense of substantial cuts to the foreign aid budget and domestic welfare programs, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable in society.​

Redirecting funds from welfare and aid programs to military spending will inevitably exacerbate existing social inequalities and globally will only increase instability. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that the welfare cuts at home could push an additional 250,000 individuals, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty by 2029-30, impacting over 3 million households.  Such austerity measures undermine the social safety net, leaving marginalized communities to bear the brunt of fiscal policies that prioritise the military over human well-being.

It isn’t just the vulnerable at home who will suffer as a result of these policies. In 2023-24, the UK’s core military spending was approximately 3.5 times the size of the aid budget; by 2027-28, it is projected to be about ten times larger. This dramatic shift signifies a troubling departure from the UK’s commitment to international development and humanitarian assistance. When the Trump Administration announced their slashing of US AID Foreign Secretary David Lammy described it as a “big strategic mistake” – just weeks before supporting a similar policy in Cabinet.

The government’s obsession with ever-increasing military spending entails significant opportunity costs. Public services are already under strain, with record-high NHS waiting lists, deteriorating school infrastructure, and persistent child poverty. Removing the two-child benefit cap would cost a fraction of the upcoming increase in military spending, yet would change the lives of more than 500,000 children. Redirecting resources towards the military diverts much-needed investment away from these critical areas, hindering efforts to address pressing social issues and improve the quality of life for citizens.​

Not only is there a social cost to increasing military spending, but historical precedents cast doubt on the effectiveness of such expenditure in achieving genuine security. Last year, it was revealed that the Ministry of Defence was facing a black hole of nearly £17bn, in what the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee called “a marked deterioration” in the financial situation. It is very likely that much of this new money will simply go towards covering spiralling costs of existing programmes including the replacement of the Trident nuclear weapons system.

Despite the broad political consensus in support of increasing military spending, what isn’t raised often enough in Parliament is the need for human security. A more holistic approach to national and global security emphasises peacebuilding over military dominance. Investing in conflict prevention, sustainable development, climate change mitigation, social programs, human rights, and humanitarian efforts can address the root causes of instability.  Such investments not only foster global stability but also contribute to a more just and equitable society.​

Call to Action

The current trajectory of increased military spending at the expense of social welfare and international aid is both morally and strategically flawed. Last week saw the start of the Global Days of Action on Military Spending – with campaigners across the UK and around the world coming together to challenge spiralling military spending. The Global Campaign on Military Spending UK is leading these efforts in the UK and has a range of activities planned. Together we can put forward the case for an alternative future and advocate for “Welfare not Warfare!”


\