Wednesday, September 09, 2026

Diplomatic row escalates as UK, France and Canada move to sanction Israeli settlements

Issued on: 09/09/2026 - FRANCE24

Britain, France and Canada said Tuesday they will ban imports from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, with a UK minister accusing Israel of turning a blind eye to the "ethnic cleansing" of Palestinians there. The moves prompted a furious Israel to unveil immediate counter-measures targeting Britain, as Jerusalem-based journalist Jordana Miller reports.



‘Must Be Just the Beginning’: UK, France, Canada Move to Ban Imports From Israeli Settlements

“Today, we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two-state solution,” said UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband.


Palestinians inspect severe damage inside a family home following an Israeli military raid and siege in the West Bank on September 8, 2026.
(Photo by Issam Rimawi/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


The United Kingdom, France, and Canada joined forces on Tuesday to ban imports of goods and some services from illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, where settlers and soldiers are assailing, displacing, and killing Palestinians at an unprecedented rate with the backing of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

“Today, we refuse to be bystanders to further suffering and to the destruction of the two-state solution,” Ed Miliband, the UK’s foreign secretary, said in a speech to the House of Commons. Miliband pointed to the Israeli government’s recent approval of construction projects that would evict Palestinian communities and “place settlements directly between East Jerusalem and the West Bank, cutting through the heart of Palestine.”

“Let’s be clear what this means: the creation of a set of facts on the ground to make the two-state solution unviable,” said Miliband, in what was described as the UK government’s most forceful condemnation of Israeli conduct in the West Bank to date. “The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank—perpetrated by settler terrorists. And all too often the Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this and worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

Miliband said the UK government would “take action against specific companies and individuals who provide services such as construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate for settlement expansion” and penalize “those who finance or facilitate illegal settlements.” He said the sanctions would be in place within six to nine months.



Miliband emphasized that in banning imports from Israel’s West Bank settlements, the UK was not acting alone. The British foreign secretary noted that France and Canada will also “ban the import of goods from illegal settlements,” joining “the Netherlands, Ireland, Belgium, Spain and Norway—which have either banned goods or are in the process of doing so.”

Jean-Noël Barrot, France’s foreign affairs minister, wrote on social media that France is cutting off imports from illegal Israeli settlements “because the West Bank is on the brink of explosion: unchecked expansion of colonization in violation of international law, surge in violence perpetrated by extremist settlers against Palestinians, acts of terror denounced by the Israeli authorities themselves.”

“France cannot, through its trade, support a situation that threatens the security of Israelis and Palestinians alike, as well as peace and stability in the region,” Barrot wrote. “Europe must uphold the same imperative.”

In a joint statement on Tuesday, the foreign ministers of 12 nations—the UK, France, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden—said that the situation in the West Bank is “rapidly deteriorating amid unprecedented levels of settler violence and settlement expansion, including the unacceptable decision to publish tenders for the E1 settlement project.”

The foreign ministers confirmed their “intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures.”

“In this regard, the UK, France, and Canada welcome the important action already taken by Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, Norway, and Belgium, and will bring forward national measures to ban trade in settlement goods,” the statement continued. “The government of Israel must immediately halt the expansion of settlements and civilian administrative powers, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate allegations against Israeli forces.”

Advocates largely welcomed the governments’ announcements while stressing that they should be the starting point for more sweeping action to confront the Israeli government’s illegal annexation efforts in the West Bank and crimes against humanity across the Palestinian territories, including the decimated Gaza Strip.

“Today’s announcement is the result of many years of work by campaigners and Palestinians themselves fighting to end severe injustice,” said Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based advocacy group Global Justice Now. “We know this move will be very popular in Britain. But it must be just the beginning. How can we cooperate with a military guilty of the most serious abuses of international law? How can we trade with a country that stands accused of genocide at the world’s highest court?”

Omar Barghouti, co-founder of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, dismissed the UK government’s sanctions announcement as “largely performative,” but said they also “reflect the impact of relentless public pressure on the current government.”

“The UK is legally obliged to take serious measures to end its complicity with the State of Israel, not merely with the settlements, per the [International Court of Justice],” said Barghouti. “While Miliband says, ‘We will not acquiesce in the destruction of the two-state solution,’ he has not said how the UK will stop its active contribution to the Israeli-US led destruction of the international legal system and the drive towards a might-makes-right order.”

US and Israeli officials responded furiously to the UK’s sanctions announcement. Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s extremist national security minister, called for the closure of the British consulate in East Jerusalem, while Israel’s finance minister demanded the expulsion of the British ambassador.

Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, characterized the UK’s trade ban as “discrimination against the Jewish people” and suggested that individual American states such as Florida could retaliate against the British government.

US Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), a rabidly pro-Israel lawmaker and anti-Muslim bigot, wrote on social media that “Florida is one of Britain’s largest trading partners” and signaled that the state could move to boycott UK goods.

Far-Right Israeli Finance Minister Demands Expulsion of UK Ambassador Over Settlement Trade Ban

The United Kingdom’s Labour government is set to announce a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.



Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich takes part in the Jerusalem Day parade at the Damascus Gate in the old city of Jerusalem on May 14, 2026.
(Photo by Erik Marmor/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The United Kingdom on Tuesday is expected to announce a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, a plan that prompted a furious response from far-right Israeli and American officials even as British diplomats privately acknowledged that the new sanctions package would be mostly symbolic.

“Expel the British ambassador tonight!” Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich wrote in a social media post ahead of the official announcement. “We will not be a doormat trampled by an antisemitic government, in a country conquered by radical Islam, trying to save itself from economic and social decline by attacking Jews and the State of Israel.”

UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, who is Jewish, is set to unveil the trade ban as the Israeli government aggressively accelerates its unlawful land grabs and expulsion of Palestinians in the West Bank, where violent rampages by Israeli settlers have reached unprecedented levels. The trade ban was developed after the Israeli government advanced a plan to build more than 1,200 new settlement homes in the West Bank.

The Guardian reported Monday that “in his statement to MPs, Miliband is expected to use firmer language than his recent predecessors in calling out the humanitarian injustices suffered by Palestinians in Gaza.”

“The steps he lays out are likely to fall short of the full set of demands made by Palestinian advocacy groups,” the outlet added, “but they will still be seen as a sign that the UK is moving beyond traditional rhetorical support for a two-state solution towards active steps to forestall the expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank—widely seen as intended to destroy the prospect of a Palestinian state.”

New UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham reportedly spoke with US President Donald Trump on Monday about the impending trade ban, which drew condemnation from the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee.

Behind the scenes, according to Bloomberg, UK diplomats “privately told the US that the sanctions are largely symbolic and will have no material impact on the UK’s wider relationship with Israel on trade or security, in a bid to soothe the Trump administration’s response.”

Francesca Albanese, the United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, told The Guardian that a ban on trade with Israeli settlements would be an “absolutely important” change in UK government policy.

Nick Dearden, director of the UK-based advocacy group Global Justice Now, wrote on social media that “a settlement ban is welcome but we must go further.”

“Hope the government will include services and will announce new bans of weapons sales and military coordination tomorrow,” Dearden added. “The comms is an improvement but we need action.”

Reuters reported that the impact of the policy move on bilateral trade with Israel is “likely to be ⁠minimal, with details unclear of how the UK will differentiate between goods originating in West Bank settlements [and] products made in Israel.”

‘I’ll Wear It as a Badge of Honor,’ Says MP Sultana After Israel Bars Entry to 11 UK Lawmakers

“I will not be intimidated into silence,” said MP Zarah Sultana. “If anything, this ban only strengthens my resolve to keep speaking out.”


Your Party MP Zarah Sultana speaks during a national march for Palestine on January 31, 2026, in London, England. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators marched through central London to protest Israel’s military actions in Gaza and to call on the UK government to end its political and military support for Israel.
(Photo by Alishia Abodunde/Getty Images)


Stephen Prager
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Zarah Sultana, a member of the UK Parliament, said she won’t stop speaking about the rights of Palestinians after Israel banned her from entering the country on Tuesday.

“Given that this is a fascist government presiding over genocide, apartheid and an illegal occupation, I’ll wear it as a badge of honor,” she said in a post to X. “I will not be intimidated into silence. I will continue to speak out against Israel’s genocide and against the UK’s complicity. If anything, this ban only strengthens my resolve to keep speaking out.”

Sultana, who represents Coventry South and is a co-founder of the left-wing Your Party, was one of 11 members of Parliament whom Israel announced it was blocking from entry in retaliation after the UK joined Canada, France, and other nations to announce an import ban on goods from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law.


Following a year of record violence against Palestinians in the territory, UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said the import ban was in response to the “ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank—perpetrated by settler terrorists.”

Israel has reacted with fury at the move, closing the British consulate in East Jerusalem, which handles relations with Palestinians in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza.

Also banned from the country are UK Labour MPs Diane Abbott, Richard Burgon, John McDonnell, and Naz Shah; Green MPs Siân Berry, Ellie Chowns, Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay, and Hannah Spencer; as well as Jeremy Corbyn, who led the Labour Party from 2015-20 before co-founding Your Party with Sultana in 2025.

Remarking on his and his colleagues’ ban from the country, Corbyn said Israel’s treatment of Palestinians was “the real scandal.”



“I have visited all parts of Palestine on several occasions, where I have witnessed the horrors of occupation, as well as the resilience and humanity of the Palestinian people,” Corbyn wrote on X. “They are the ones who suffer from Israel’s apartheid. It is their freedom which is egregiously curtailed, alongside thousands of Palestinian refugees who are denied the right of return.”

He added: “As the world wakes up to the genocide in Gaza, it is shocking that Israel continues to deny entry to UN investigators and international journalists. Israel doesn’t want the world to see what it is doing—but we can never give up in our attempts to expose the truth.”

Israel also banned Fahad Ansari, a lawyer who has represented Hamas’ political wing in court in the UK and—like Sultana—said on X, “I am neither British nor an MP but do take this as a badge of honor (although pretty sure I’m already a persona non grata in the apartheid state).”


Corbyn Urges UK Government to Condemn Gaza Genocide After Israeli Settlement Trade Ban

“This is not merely a matter of semantics. This is a matter of international law.”


UK Member of Parliament Jeremy Corbyn holds a copy of the Gaza Tribunal Report at Conway Hall in London on March 16, 2026.
(Photo by Jeremy Corbyn/X)

Jessica Corbett
Sep 08, 2026
CONMMON DREAMS


Amid Israeli settlers and soldiers’ unprecedented violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, Member of Parliament Jeremy Corbyn was among those arguing on Tuesday that the United Kingdom’s new “sanctions on illegal settlements are welcome, but not enough,” and calling on Prime Minister Andy Burnham to condemn Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip as genocide.

On behalf of the UK’s ruling Labour Party, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank. He was joined by leaders from Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden, who confirmed “their intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions” on trading with Israeli West Bank settlements.

Corbyn, a former Labour leader from Islington North who has since co-founded Your Party, declared that “Britain must end all arms sales, all military cooperation, and all forms of support that sustain Israel’s system of apartheid, occupation, and genocide.”



In addition to speaking in Parliament on Tuesday, Corbyn wrote to Burnham that “for three years, we have witnessed the abominable destruction of human life in Gaza,” where “Israel has killed at least 73,000 people, excluding an untold number of people lost under the rubble.”

While welcoming Burnham’s recent admission that Labour “got it wrong” and its “initial response to the treatment of Gaza caused huge hurt,” Corbyn said that “it is extremely disappointing that these words have not translated into meaningful action.”

“It has not gone unnoticed that, 50 days into your premiership, you have declined to call ‘the treatment of Gaza’ what it really is: a genocide,” the MP stressed, noting that the term has long been used by scholars and human rights advocates globally. “This is not merely a matter of semantics. This is a matter of international law.”

“Far from preventing genocide, the British government has facilitated genocide through ongoing military, economic, and political cooperation,” Corbyn charged, pointing to his call for an independent public inquiry into the UK’s complicity. “The question is not whether Labour got it wrong. The question is what your government will do now.”

Corbyn asked Burnham to confirm if he will establish an inquiry, end all military cooperation with Israel, impose widespread sanctions, overturn the ban on the advocacy group Palestine Action, and support the work of the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice—the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister, and the ICJ has taken up South Africa’s genocide case on the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) conduct in Gaza.



As Corbyn pushed UK leaders to go further than the new trade ban—which is largely symbolic—the Israeli government responded to the sanctions by taking aim at a dozen people, including Corbyn and his Your Party co-founder, MP Zarah Sultana, barring them from entering Israel.

Israel also banned four Labour MPs—Diane Abbot, Richard Burgon, John McDonnell, and Naz Shah, as well as five members of the Green Party: Siân Berry, Ellie Chowns, Carla Denyer, Adrian Ramsay, and Hannah Spencer. The final person barred from Israel is Fahad Ansari, a lawyer who has represented Hamas’ political wing in court in the UK, according to The Times of Israel.

Ansari replied on social media Tuesday that “I am neither British nor an MP but do take this as a badge of honor (although pretty sure I’m already a persona non grata in the apartheid state).”

Meanwhile, others in the United Kingdom and around the world joined Corbyn in framing the Labour government’s sanctions as progress, while also emphasizing that, as the Corbyn-founded Peace & Justice Project put it, “they should only mark the start of the process in bringing about real peace and social justice for the Palestinian people, who have been subjected to decades of unimaginable subjugation, ethnic cleansing, and genocide.”

“The UK government must commit to a full arms embargo on Israel, ending all forms of military cooperation with the IDF, and supporting the ICC arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his Cabinet,” the project declared, calling for the full implementation of recommendations from the Gaza Tribunal report from last year.



Describing the UK’s “concrete action” and recognition of “Israel’s unlawful occupation and ethnic cleansing” as “hugely welcome,” Kerry Moscogiuri, Amnesty International UK’s chief executive, noted that Miliband “promised a ‘comprehensive reset’ and today could be the sea change that is needed.”

“Amid ethnic cleansing, genocide, and apartheid against Palestinians, today’s measures are a genuine step towards accountability for Israel’s repeated and flagrant violations of international law,” she said. “The commitment to ban trade in settlement goods and some services, prohibit financing of settlements, refuse arms that contribute to the occupation, and support the genocide case before the International Court of Justice represents a significant change of course.”

“For years, Amnesty has worked with members, partners and parliamentarians from across the political spectrum to press for meaningful change, and today shows that campaigning for human rights works,” she added. “But today is not the end of the road. The test now is whether these commitments are properly implemented and enforced, and followed by the wider action needed to hold Israel accountable for its crimes and meet the UK’s obligations under international law.”

MAGA lawmaker's threat to punish Britain could wipe out 70,000 jobs in his own state

Alexander Willis
September 8, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. Representative Randy Fine (R-FL) leaves after the House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution on the ongoing conflict with Iran on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 23, 2026. REUTERS/Eric Lee

Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) issued a fierce threat to the British government as it considered imposing boycotts on goods from illegal Israeli settlements, a threat that could end up wiping out around 70,000 American jobs.

On Monday, reports revealed that the United Kingdom was preparing to impose new restrictions on goods produced in Israeli settlements. There are more than 700,000 Israeli settlers illegally living in the West Bank, with instances of Israeli settler violence rising in recent months. Also on Monday, Fine issued the United Kingdom a warning.

“As the British government considers forcing British companies to boycott portions of Israel, it should be aware that a Florida law that I passed as a member of the Legislature would ban any British company forced to comply from doing business with any state or local government in Florida,” Fine wrote in a statement published on social media.

“It would also end any British business participating in that boycott from doing any business in Florida if it needed any official interaction with state or local government to operate (permits, tax collection). Florida is one of Britain’s largest trading partners. They should understand that their vanity project in support of Muslim terror could cost them billions of dollars.”

The United Kingdom is a top investor in Florida, and British companies account for around 70,000 jobs in the Sunshine State. In a follow-up post, Fine asked X's chatbot Grok to explain how Florida's anti-boycott law might affect British companies — and critics said its response backfired on him spectacularly.

“LOL. You are going to wreck your own state,” wrote Leilani Dowding, a British model and reality television personality, in a social media post on X Tuesday.

“Haha, you asked Grok, and it told you how much your plan would f--- over Florida, not the UK,” wrote Jack Duncan, a British LGBTQ+ rights activist, in a social media post on X Tuesday.

About a dozen” American citizens have died from incidents involving Israeli settlers or soldiers, including the death of American activist Rachel Corrie, who was crushed to death by an IDF bulldozer in Gaza in 2003. An American was killed by Israeli settlers as recently as July of last year: 20-year-old Sayfollah Musallet, who was “beaten to death” by settlers while on his family’s farm near Ramallah in the West Bank.



US-Israeli arms firm Covenant to build cruise missiles in Germany

09.09.2026

By Carsten Hoffmann, dpa

US-Israeli defence contractor Covenant plans to set up a production facility for long-range cruise missiles in the German state of Saxony, the company said on Wednesday.

"We will be producing roughly 1,000 in our first year and then scaling to 5,000," Covenant chief Abigail Denburg said, outlining the company's "target for annual production."

Production of the Anthem cruise missile for European customers is to begin next year at the facility to be set up near Leipzig.

It comes as Germany and other European states are in the process of massively ramping up their defence industry in response to a growing threat from Russia.

"When you look at our adversaries, you see thousands of hardened targets, beyond the range of current capabilities," said Michael Kaufman, Covenant's co-founder and chief executive said in a press release.

"Anthem was built to credibly hold those targets at risk in a prolonged conflict. If our stockpiles run thin, so does our deterrence."

Anthem missiles can carry a 200-kilogram warhead and are designed for precision strikes deep within enemy territory. Covenant has not commented on media reports suggesting Anthem's range is 1,500 kilometres.

The company says it plans to offer the weapons system at a significantly lower price than those currently available on the market. Covenant said Anthem would cost a six-figure sum, meaning less than $1 million, while other weapons systems of this kind typically cost several million dollars per unit.

Mass production has military significance and is intended to improve customers' staying power. Denburg said: "Deterrence is a calculation by the enemy and that calculation changes when you have extensive weapons arsenals. If you can reach a target and strike once, that does not necessarily deter the enemy."

Covenant is already in talks with the Bundeswehr and the procurement agency, according to dpa information, though this has not been officially confirmed. 

Denburg said, without directly referring to Germany, that there was already a production contract for deliveries from Germany starting in the first quarter of 2027.

"This European customer will decide for themselves when they want to make this public," she said.

Company raises more than $250 million

Covenant was founded in 2024 and is headquartered in Washington. The company said it has raised more than $250 million from investors in three funding rounds.

Backers include Founders Fund, which counts Peter Thiel among its co-founders. He is known for his libertarian and right-wing conservative positions, his closeness to US President Donald Trump and his criticism of liberal democracies.

Defence Minister Boris Pistorius of the Social Democrats has in the past "explicitly" shared concerns about Thiel. There has also been public discussion of whether new dependencies could arise or whether the risk is greater of finding oneself without sufficiently stocked ammunition depots in a crisis.

Covenant said German retired Lieutenant General Andreas Marlow is an adviser. He was deputy inspector of the army until 2025 and from 2022 also led the EU training mission for the Ukrainian armed forces.

A long-range missile programme produced in Europe was "the missing piece of the puzzle in our deterrence architecture", Marlow was quoted as saying.

Germany and its European NATO allies are currently seeking to procure long-range weapons systems as a response to the Russian threat as well as develop their own. At the NATO summit in Ankara, the German government agreed with the United States to buy US Tomahawk cruise missiles.

At the beginning of September, the German navy successfully completed a previously secret test of the Israeli missile system Lora, a ballistic missile. Germany already has the Taurus cruise missile made by defence company MBDA but it is far from being mass-produced.

European NATO states also do not yet have their own intermediate-range weapons. In the medium term, several allies want to procure their own weapons system for long-range precision strikes. To that end, the Elsa project, the European Long-Range Strike Approach, was launched in 2024 at the NATO summit in Washington.

Private Chats From Israeli Guards Detail ‘Horrifying’ Abuse, Killings of Palestinian Prisoners

“Israeli detention centers have essentially become torture camps,” said one Israeli rights group in response to the new revelations. “Torture is Israel’s policy.”


The Ofer Prison is seen in Jerusalem, Israel on January 19, 2025.
(Photo by Mostafa Alkharouf/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Brad Reed
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Newly uncovered text messages sent by guards at Israel’s Ketziot Prison reveal a pattern of appalling abuse against Palestinian prisoners, with some guards boasting of beating detainees to death.

As reported by Haaretz on Tuesday, WhatsApp messages sent in November 2023 showed guards at the prison gleefully recounting violent assaults on prisoners, openly hoping their actions would deliver fatal injuries.

“They’re doing CPR in the clinic right now, baby!” wrote one guard after describing the beating delivered to a detainee. “God willing, that son of a thousand whores will die.”

Another guard excitedly wrote that “they’re doing CPR on a prisoner because we beat him,” then relayed news that the prisoner had passed away.

“He’s dead,” wrote the guard. “Listen, it’s funny how it all happened in an instant: Boom, count. Boom, dead prisoner.”

A third guard gloated in a message that “we fucked them up so bad.”

The texts were uncovered by Israeli prosecutors as part of an indictment filed last week against a dozen prison guards for their alleged roles in the deaths of nine Palestinian prisoners.

Haaretz noted that prosecuting guards for alleged abuses against Palestinians is normally difficult due to guards’ unwillingness to speak out, which is why prosecutors’ ability to obtain the text messages was so crucial.

“The investigation files now coming to light offer a rare glimpse into the guards’ routine use of severe violence against Palestinian prisoners,” Haaretz explained. “They also reveal evidence of senior officials suppressing accounts and turning a blind eye, if not taking part themselves. At least one witness alleged that Ketziot Prison commander Yosef Knipes was involved. He denied it.”

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, who earlier this year published interviews with Palestinian prisoners detailing the sexual abuse they allegedly suffered at the hands of Israeli forces, wrote in a social media post that the unearthed texts offer a “horrifying account” of “how Israeli prison guards brutalized Palestinian prisoners, sometimes killing them, even as the US supplied endless weapons and diplomatic support.”

Israeli rights group Breaking the Silence argued that the texts uncovered by investigators represent only a small part of the total abuse carried out in Israeli prisons.

“Since October 2023, more than 100 Palestinians have entered Israeli custody alive and later left in body bags,” the organization wrote. “Israeli detention centers have essentially become torture camps. Torture is Israel’s policy.”
Volkswagen to cut 50,000 more jobs to counter tariffs and Chinese competition


Volkswagen announced Thursday that it will cut another 50,000 jobs worldwide, marking the biggest restructuring in the company's 89-year history, as the German carmaker faces pressure from US tariffs, overcapacity and fierce competition from Chinese rivals.

Issued on: 04/09/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

Volkswagen's headquarters in Wolfsburg, Germany, on November 21, 2025. © Ronny Hartmann, AFP


Volkswagen's supervisory board on Thursday approved a transformation plan that will include cutting another 50,000 jobs in its attempt to counter painful tariffs, overcapacity and aggressive Chinese rivals.

The plan, the most extensive restructuring in Volkswagen's 89-year history, includes exploring alternatives for four German plants that will eventually run out of models during the next decade.

It also averts a major clash with unions by putting the scenario of an extraordinary general meeting on the back burner, a scenario that was considered by management to push through its plans against workers and Volkswagen's second-largest shareholder, Lower Saxony.

The deal will result in a simplification of Volkswagen's conglomerate structure and limit the influence of the group's supervisory board – on which unions and Lower Saxony hold a majority – on key decisions.

"This is a strong signal for the future of the Volkswagen Group. We are taking responsibility for our entire workforce, for our partners and for industrial jobs worldwide," CEO Oliver Blume said in a statement.

Frankfurt-listed Volkswagen shares closed 7.9 percent higher following the news, reflecting relief over what sources said could have escalated into an unprecedented crisis at Europe's largest automaker.

Cover image: Volkswagen says situation critical REUTERS - Lisi Niesner
01:12


Industry analyst Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer said the next 10 months would see discussions over the future of Volkswagen's plants in Emden, Zwickau, Neckarsulm and Hannover, which all face a staggered phase-out from 2031 onwards.

The deal follows weeks of tense negotiations that pitted the board and majority owner Porsche SE against unions and Lower Saxony, with the idea of a spinoff of Volkswagen's passenger car and components businesses no longer being mentioned.

"A certain sense of calm is returning, but it is far from 'peace'. In politics, one would call it a 'ceasefire'. That's a good thing, because now the focus can be on the business," Dudenhoeffer said.

The "Future Plan" comes as Volkswagen faces pressure from all sides, squeezed between US import tariffs and a weak Chinese market, the world's biggest car market and once the group's cash cow.

Volkswagen said "a further fundamental adjustment of the global workforce capacity" was needed, saying this would include a reduction of around 50,000 positions worldwide – in addition to a 50,000-job reduction already under way.

The company did not provide further details on the timing of the workforce reduction or how the cuts would be distributed across its brands and regions.

(FRANCE 24 with Reuters)




'They were legends': Humpback whales make spectacular comeback off Brazil's coast



Once driven to the brink of extinction, humpback whales have thrived in the South Atlantic since a worldwide moratorium on commercial whaling came into force in 1986, offering a bonanza to scientists who come each year to Brazil's Abrolhos archipelago to record and study the cetaceans.


Issued on: 28/08/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

The warm waters off the coast of Brazil are the largest breeding ground for Southern Atlantic humpbacks. © Jose Osorio, AFP


Female humpback whales off the coast of Brazil now have their pick of mates, who slap the water with their tails and jostle for attention – a scene that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago.

Driven to near-extinction in the 1980s, there are now about 35,000 humpback whales in the South Atlantic, almost half of the world's total.

The warm waters off the coast of Brazil are the largest breeding ground for Southern Atlantic humpbacks. Males compete for the chance to mate, and females give birth and nurse their calves.

They also offer a bonanza to scientists who come each year to the Abrolhos archipelago off the coast of the state of Bahia to record and study hundreds of the cetaceans.

Four decades ago, no one even knew there were whales in Brazil, said Enrico Marcovaldi, founder of the Humpback Whale Institute (IBJ) – one of Brazil's leading organisations researching and protecting the species.

The first time he saw one, he mistook it for a rock.

"They were legends. We had never seen one," Marcovaldi told AFP.


Wearing a life jacket and helmet, and armed with a crossbow, biologist Fabio Fontes pursues the group of males in a small boat who are competing to mate with a female © Evaristo Sa, AFP

Humpback populations have thrived since a worldwide moratorium on commercial whaling in 1986.

The following year, Brazil banned the practice by law and later declared the Abrolhos breeding grounds a protected area.

In 2014, the humpback whale was removed from Brazil's list of threatened species, and its population has continued to thrive ever since.
Family ties

Wearing a life jacket and helmet, and armed with a crossbow, biologist Fabio Fontes pursues a group of males who are competing to mate with a female.

From his small boat, he fires an arrow that pierces the back of one whale before dropping into the water. He retrieves it with a sample of skin and blubber attached.

A team of scientists and journalists, including AFP, follows Fontes's moves from a catamaran.

A pattern of white markings against the black of a humpback's tail is its fingerprint -- a unique pattern that allows researchers to identify individual whales from photographs © Evaristo Sa, AFP

Milton Marcondes, the IBJ's research coordinator, explained that the samples can be used to establish family ties between the whales, known for one of the longest migrations of any mammal on the planet.

Years ago, the researchers discovered that a humpback born in Abrolhos was related to another spotted off South Georgia, a remote island some 4,000 kilometres (2500 miles) to the south.

The finding helped establish the migration route of the animals, which can reach up to 16 metres (roughly 50 feet) long as adults and weigh as much as six elephants.
AI identification

A pattern of white markings against the black of a humpback's tail is its fingerprint – a unique pattern that allows researchers to identify individual whales from photographs.

The comparison, which once required many pairs of eyes and hours of work, can now be done in seconds by Happy Whale, an artificial intelligence platform that has already identified 8,300 Brazilian humpbacks.

The tool helped uncover a world record: one humpback identified in Brazil was spotted more than 15,000 kilometres away off Australia's east coast, according to research published in May.


Milton Marcondes, the research coordinator at Brazil's Humpback Whale Institute, processes samples from a humpback whale. © Evaristo Sa, AFP

"We are seeing that populations in the Southern Hemisphere are much more interconnected than we imagined," Marcondes told AFP.

These days, the whales face threats from maritime traffic, fishing nets, and warming seas caused by climate change, which threatens the krill they survive on.

The IBJ has received financial support from Brazil's state oil company Petrobras for 30 years.

Petrobras, which drills for oil off Brazil and recently made new discoveries off the coast of the Amazon, supports several species recovery projects in the country.

In October, the Abrolhos archipelago was designated a "Hope Spot" by Mission Blue, founded by oceanographer Sylvia Earle, recognising its rich biodiversity and importance to marine conservation.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Wildfires, heatwaves threaten global air quality and health, UN warns

Wildfires and heatwaves are threatening global efforts to improve air quality and protect human health, the World Meteorological Organisation said on Monday. The UN agency warned that increasingly severe fires are raising exposure to toxic PM2.5 pollution, even as regulations have reduced industrial and transport emissions in Europe and North America.

Issued on: 07/09/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

A man rides a scooter beneath a smoke-filled sky as a wildfire burns in Deliblatska Pescara, some 70 kilometres northeast of Belgrade, Serbia, on August 20, 2026. © Uros Arsic, AFP

Wildfires and heatwaves, which generate microscopic airborne pollutants, risk undermining international efforts to improve air quality, protect human health and safeguard nature, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said on Monday.

The United Nations' weather and climate agency underlined the links between air pollution and climate change, which scientists say is leading to more frequent and more intense heatwaves and wildfires.

"Extreme wildfires are increasing, leading to big health consequences because of the high toxicity of smoke," the WMO said in a statement accompanying its latest annual Air Quality and Climate Bulletin.

"Whilst regulations in Europe and North America have reduced industrial and transport PM2.5 emissions, exposure to fire-related PM2.5 has increased."

Particulate matter PM2.5 is composed of microscopic particles and droplets of less than 2.5 micrometres in diameter, which is a health hazard because it can penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream.

It is emitted by fossil fuel-driven industrial activities, farming, domestic heating and transport, as well as by wildfires and dust storms.

The report said the world needs to better monitor air pollutants such as aerosol – including black carbon and microplastics –, fine particles and ground-level ozone.

These pollutants "are not sufficiently monitored even though they are widespread and are potentially harmful to ecosystems", the WMO said.

"(We need) complementary and coordinated policies on air quality and climate because they cannot be dealt with in isolation."

Toxic wildfire smoke

"Air quality and climate change can't be dealt with separately. If one worsens, the other does too," Lorenzo Labrador, from the WMO's Global Atmosphere Watch network of scientists, told AFP.

"In places where there are relatively powerful forest fires, we find a lot of fine particle pollution," he said.

Microparticles generated by burning vegetation are "much more toxic" than those emitted by other sources, even car exhaust, he stressed.

They damage the health of people and wildlife living far from the fire itself because they are carried by the wind, but their poisonous effect is not sufficiently taken into account in air quality assessments, Labrador said.

"Conventional risks models based on total PM2.5 concentrations may underestimate wildfire-attributable mortality by up to 93 percent," the WMO said.

One study cited in the WMO Bulletin says extreme fire-smoke events have tripled globally since the 1990s, contributing to nearly 100,000 additional deaths per year between 2010 and 2018, although this may be an underestimate.

Ozone, microplastics

Another source of air pollution that carries major health risks is ground-level ozone, which accumulates when temperatures rise, atmospheric conditions stagnate and solar radiation is intense, as seen during recent heatwaves in China, Europe and the southeastern United States.

"This increased exposure to ozone pollution has the potential to lead to tens of thousands of additional premature deaths," particularly due to respiratory diseases, the WMO warned.

Another growing concern is aerosol particles, which can also travel to oceans and continents far from their source.

They can alter the way the atmosphere reflects sunlight, change the chemical properties of land and water, and pollute otherwise clean environments.

"One example is the deposition of black carbon – or soot – on snow and ice, which reduces the amount of sunlight reflected by these surfaces and in turn can hasten the melting process," the WMO explained.

Another example is microplastics, formed when plastics break down because of sunlight or other factors, and found virtually everywhere – in the air, the soil and the oceans.

One simulation in the WMO Bulletin estimates there are "51 million tonnes for land and 22 million tonnes for the ocean – which are in turn a source of microplastics for the atmosphere".

"As plastic production and, critically, mismanaged plastic waste, continues to increase," monitoring the airborne paths that carry microplastics from their source and dump them in remote environments will be "crucial", the report said.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
Mass burial reveals hidden toll of Algeria’s deadly ‘Black Wednesday’ wildfires

Wildfires ripped across northeastern Algeria in late August. Photos and videos showing the mass burial of several dozen people have raised questions about the real death toll of the fires as Algerian authorities haven’t shared new numbers since August 26. A number of Moroccan social media accounts have also been sharing disinformation about the fires.

Issued on: 04/09/2026 
The FRANCE 24 Observers

The death toll remains unknown for the wildfires that ripped across the region of Jijel in northeastern Algeria (shown in the image to the left). While the official number given on August 26 was just 12 dead, footage and information from the ground make it seem as if the number could be in the hundreds. A mass burial took place on August 28 in the village of Djemaa Beni Habibi (at right). © Observers

It’s after sundown, and a person is digging a rectangular hole in the ground as around 20 men watch. The image was captured in a TikTok live shared on August 27, narrated by a man speaking in Algerian Arabic.

"Each time, they bring 30 or 40 [bodies]. Many people have died. There are people who are looking for their parents, for their children and they haven’t found them yet. El Ancer, Texenna, El Milia, [almost all of the region of] Jijel has been affected."


In this video, a young resident of Jijel documents the digging of a mass grave in the cemetery in the small town of Djemaa Beni Habibi. © TikTok




Jijel is the name of both a town and a wilaya – a province – located on the northeastern coast of Algeria. It was one of the main regions affected by a wave of forest fires that began on August 26, nicknamed “Black Wednesday” by locals and some officials. The flames reached the outskirts of the towns listed above between August 26 and 27, as shown on the FIRMS site, run by the US space agency NASA, which enables the public to watch the progression of wildfires in real time.

The towns of Texenna, El Ancer and El Milia were all impacted by wildfires between August 26 and 27, as shown by the FIRMS website, which enables you to watch the evolution of fires in real time. Red marks indicate where an active fire or a temperature anomaly has been detected. © Observers / FIRMS / Google Earth

The person who filmed the video is a young resident of Jijel. Before the fires, he mostly posted about sports and fitness. But since they began, he’s been documenting the situation.

He says the mass grave was being dug in "Djemaa Beni Habibi, which was badly hit”. This detail enabled us to verify that the video was filmed in the cemetery of a small town, 30 kilometres east of Jijel.

No official numbers despite PM attending funeral

The next day, other videos posted by residents give a sense of the scale of the tragedy.

Several residents attended the funeral on August 28 in Djemaa Beni Habibi, filming videos that they later shared on social media.

In some of the images, you can see up to 13 caskets at once.

This image, taken from a now-deleted video, shows a mass funeral in Djemaa Beni Habibi on August 28. The angle reveals at least 13 coffins in the trench. The caption claims that “the death toll exceeds 140”, including members of the author’s family. © TikTok

Another video, recorded at the cemetery after part of the mass grave had been filled, shows more than twenty individual graves, each a simple mound of earth, marked only by a water bottle or a stick. The excavator, still operating when the footage was taken, is covering at least three more coffins with dirt. A large section of the trench remains empty, seemingly capable of holding several more bodies.


Cover image: This video shows the mass grave after it was partially filled by the heavy machinery on site. We can see at least 20 burial mounds, as well as the bottles and sticks that mark the graves. More coffins have not yet been buried, and there is still space in the grave. © Observers
00:30


Algerian Prime Minister Sifi Ghrieb, as well as several other government officials, attended the burial. Official local authority social media accounts also reported on the burial, but did not say how many people were buried.

However, other sources are helping us establish the human toll. On the evening of August 27, the night before the burial, the village of Djemaa Beni Habibi posted two statements on Facebook (here and here) listing the names of wildfire victims recorded by two hospitals. The lists were meant for families, so that they could come to see the bodies.

FRANCE 24 Observers team documented a total of 72 names after examining both lists, accounting for duplications.

This list of victims, posted on Facebook by the official Facebook account of the village of Djemaa Beni Habibi on the evening of August 27, 2026, contains the names of 72 people whose bodies were reportedly in one of the two hospitals in the region. Our team blurred the names of the victims out of respect for their families. © Village of Djemaa Beni Habibi

Death toll rising sharply from preliminary figures

The Algerian authorities have stopped publishing official numbers of dead and wounded from the fires in late August. The initial toll, given on August 26 by the Ministry of the Interior, cited 12 deaths and 54 people injured. But the numbers are clearly higher than that, as more people were buried in the mass grave in Djemaa Beni Habibi alone.

Moreover, information from the ground also contradicts the official numbers. An Algerian congressman who visited the affected zone on August 31 said on Facebook that 19 members of the same family died in the village of El Ancer during the Black Wednesday fires.

Our team counted at least 98 victims from the Jiljel region after examining statements made by officials, local governments and families. If you include people mentioned in articles published in local media outlets – difficult to verify because they don’t always name the victims – our toll rose to nearly 130 potential victims. Journalist Nozha Khelalef, quoted by Algerian media outlets and French newspaper Le Monde, documented more than 200 names using a similar method.

The number of victims is likely even higher than that. Pan-African media outlet Jeune Afrique cited, on August 28, quotes from anonymous sources close to the Algerian Ministry of Defence. They said that 385 people died in the fires, and more are missing.

Our team contacted the Algerian Civil Defence to ask them if the official death toll has risen since August 26. They did not respond to our question. We will update this article when and if they do.

A tragedy instrumentalised by pro-Morocco social media accounts

On X, the uncertainty around the death toll has been exploited by accounts that support Morocco, Algeria’s geopolitical rival.

One of them posted a video showing what he claimed were “more than 20 victims” who were “buried at 3am”.

"Another video that contradicts the version of events given by the Algerian military regime,” he said. The FRANCE 24 Observers team was unable to independently verify this video or his claims.

This post, shared on August 29 by an account that supports the Moroccan government, features a video of about 20 coffins draped with an Algerian flag, which we were not able to independently verify. “Another video [that] contradicts the version of events given by the Algerian military regime,” he says. © X

Others have been using photos and videos of the mass burial in Djemaa Beni Habibi. An account called "Opinion Marocaine" shared the real images from the TikTok live showing the mass grave being dug. However, it claimed it showed “burial operations under the cover of darkness in mass graves for the fire victims in Algeria, and a total absence of Algerian official media”.

This post shared on August 28, 2026 by an account that supports the Moroccan government, criticises the way that Algeria has managed the wildfires. He accuses authorities of burying victims “under the cover of darkness”. © X

However, this footage doesn’t show the funeral, but preparations for it, which likely took place the night of August 27 to August 28. The burial didn’t take place in secret, at night, as this account claims. It took place during the day, and a large number of people attended, including local and national dignitaries, as shown above. Several Algerian media outlets critical of the government also covered it.

This article has been translated from the original in French.
Smithsonian chief steps down amid Trump pressure over how US history is presented

The Smithsonian announced Tuesday that Secretary Lonnie Bunch will leave his post at the end of the year as the institution faces continued scrutiny from the Trump administration over how its museums present US history.


Issued on: 09/09/2026 
By: FRANCE 24


Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution Lonnie Bunch speaks during an event at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History on February 20, 2026 in Washington, DC. © Anna Moneymaker, Getty Images via AFP

Lonnie Bunch is stepping down from the leadership of the Smithsonian Institution following a tumultuous year in which President Donald Trump tried to remake the portrayal of US history by the Smithsonian museums and other cultural entities.

Bunch said in a news release Tuesday that he was departing the position he had held since 2019 “with very mixed emotions and heartfelt gratitude”. The Smithsonian said he would leave the post at the end of the year.

Bunch’s departure comes two months after a White House report branded the leaders of the Smithsonian Institution, especially at the National Museum of American History, as radical activists who cannot be trusted, an indication that Trump could be preparing to install his own team.

Anthea M. Hartig, the first female director of that museum, faced growing scrutiny from Trump and other Republicans over the summer after the White House Domestic Policy Council’s report saying the museum’s leadership doesn’t tell history “in a way that is inspiring, unifying, and worthy of our great republic”.

Three weeks after the report’s release, Trump ordered his administration to install signs in front of the US history museum telling visitors that some of the exhibits are inaccurate. Hartig pushed back, telling lawmakers during congressional hearings that the report “does not fairly or accurately characterise the full body of work at the museum”.


Cover image: Une vue aérienne du nouveau Lucas Museum of Narrative Art à Exposition Park, le 2 septembre 2026 à Los Angeles, en Californie. © Mario Tama, getty images/AFP
02:03


There had been speculation that firings were in the offing. Trump doesn’t have the power to fire leaders at the Smithsonian with the swiftness he’s managed at other top cultural institutions in Washington, most notably the Kennedy Center, where a board of his supporters named him chairman.

The Smithsonian operates outside the executive branch and museum directors report to Bunch, who is subject to oversight from a Board of Regents that includes Vice President JD Vance, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, a bipartisan group of lawmakers and so-called citizen regents.

Roberts, who serves as Smithsonian’s chancellor, said in a release that Bunch had “pursued excellence in the telling of our nation’s story”.

The White House did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

Tony Johnson, membership director of the Heritage Foundation, said Bunch's retirement is just the first stop. “We will fight to ensure that the next Secretary of the Smithsonian will not treat the Institution as a culture-war battleground,” he said.

Bunch is scheduled to speak September 25 at the National Museum of African American History and Culture at an event entitled: “Understanding America: 10 Years of Excellence”. A Smithsonian spokesman said Bunch would be at the event.

The Smithsonian has been under examination by the Trump administration since 2025 as it has focused on the images and messages presented to the public as the nation approached its 250th anniversary.

A March 2025 executive order, "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History", led to signs being changed at federal parks, exhibits being altered or in some cases removed, and military bases being renamed. Trump specifically cited the National Museum of African American History and Culture and argued that the Smithsonian as a whole was engaging in a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history”.

Several months later, the White House ordered a wide-ranging review of the Smithsonian museums and exhibitions before the country’s 250th birthday, with a goal of aligning the institution’s content with Trump’s interpretation of American history.

In a letter sent to Bunch at the time, the White House detailed the steps it expected the organization to take as part of the announced review. The examination covers all public-facing content, including social media, exhibition text and educational materials, to “assess tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals”, according to the letter.

That review initially focused on eight museums – the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.

California Democrat Senator Alex Padilla praised Bunch in a statement for not shying away from the nation's history. “In the face of Donald Trump’s attacks on the Smithsonian, Secretary Bunch spoke truth to power and reasserted his commitment to defend and uphold American history and values. While I respect his decision to depart, the job now falls to the Board of Regents and Congress to ensure the success of his work will remain for generations to come.”

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

Smithsonian boss's exit signals Trump's 'deeply alarming' about-face is complete: analyst

Bennito L. Kelty
September 8, 2026 
RAW STORY

The resignation of Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch marks an about-face by President Donald Trump, who once raved about the outgoing leader.

In a Tuesday appearance on CNN, presidential historian Leah Wright Rigueur flagged the evolution of Trump's posture toward the Smithsonian and explained what Bunch's departure means for institutions like it.

"Lonnie Bunch stepping down is a tremendous loss for cultural institutions across the United States," Rigueur said. "What an absolute icon in the field, somebody who truly loved history, truly loved culture, and really loved putting this kind of public display of American history first.

Rigueur explained that his decision to resign is an "absolute disappointment" that should concern everyone because of his ability to "find common ground" with the Trump administration while also protecting American history. She said Bunch had been doing that even before he led the Smithsonian.

"We should all be upset about the hole that his absence will leave," Rigueur said. "One of the things that made Lonnie really just remarkable, both in his position at the Smithsonian but also as the former head of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, was his ability to actually speak to the Trump administration and find common ground."

She pointed out that in 2017, Bunch gave Trump a tour of the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Trump "raved" about the tour and said everybody should "remember" and "be part" of the museum, according to Rigueur.

"So to see over the course of the last year or so, the administration doing an about-face on many of the ideas and really a whitewashing of history and the erasure of history is deeply alarming," Rigueur said. "The writing was on the wall for a while, from the moment the administration issued an executive order and kind of went on an attack in 2025."


The Very Clear and Easy Case for Abdul El-Sayed

And why Mike Rogers would be a disaster for the country.



DETROIT, MICHIGAN - AUGUST 05: Michigan Democratic Senate primary winner Abdul El-Sayed speaks during a press conference in front of the Spirit of Detroit statue on August 05, 2026 in Detroit, Michigan. Sayed called on Michiganders to unite against Mike Rodgers as well as challenging him to multiple debates.
Photo by Finn Gomez/Getty Images


Robert Reich
Sep 09, 2026
Inequality Media

The Democratic establishment, along with AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, spent between $60 million and $70 million trying to prevent Dr. Abdul El-Sayed from winning Michigan’s Democratic primary—roughly 11 times the money backing El-Sayed.

He won nonetheless and now faces the Republican nominee, Mike Rogers, in a race that will help determine control of the Senate after the midterms in November.

I hope Michiganders elect El-Sayed, who will be a great US senator.

After receiving an advanced degree in public health, El-Sayed worked as an epidemiologist. Informed by this experience and expertise, he advocates access to healthcare as a right and not a privilege.

He also advocates economic security for all, financed by a tax system that asks more from the wealthy. He’s a champion of civil rights. He’s a fighter for affordability against predatory landlords, monopolistic corporations, and billionaires who turn their wealth into political power.

Most Jewish Americans have values that align with Dr. El-Sayed’s. He believes in social justice—that government can be a force for good as it helps expand opportunities, protect rights, and advance the common good.

Yet AIPAC is continuing its battle against El-Sayed. It is expected to put tens of millions of dollars behind Rogers, some of it disguised behind other PACs. “Our members remain determined to ensure that voters reject Dr. El-Sayed and his radical anti-Israel agenda in November,” said Deryn Sousa, a spokeswoman for AIPAC.

El-Sayed is no more anti-Israel than I am.

Being opposed to Benjamin Netanyahu’s extreme right-wing Israeli government is not the same as being anti-Israel. Nor should it be equated with being antisemitic. Nor, for that matter, should opposition to Netanyahu and his government be seen as condoning the brutal Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, in which 1,200 were murdered and 251 taken hostage. It was an atrocity and a crime against humanity.

I believe Netanyahu is a war criminal and that his government has committed genocide in Gaza. I’m appalled that he and it continue to allow and excuse horrific violence on the West Bank against Palestinians. For this reason, I don’t believe the United States should arm Netanyahu’s government with destructive military equipment.

This doesn’t make me anti-Israel. For decades I’ve advocated a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, and I continue to believe it’s the only sane and reasonable way for these two peoples to peacefully coexist.

This certainly doesn’t make me antisemitic, either. I’m Jewish. Some of my relatives died in Hitler’s gas chambers. My mother and father were told they were unwelcome in the small town they moved to when I was a toddler because, according to the group of old men who met them at the doorstep of our new home, it was a “Christian community.”

Like me, Dr. El-Sayed opposes what the government of Netanyahu has done and continues to do. El-Sayed has affirmed that “Jewish Israelis and Palestinians alike have the right to peace, dignity, and self-determination.” He has acknowledged the horror of October 7, condemned all forms of antisemitism, and been highly critical of Israel’s war in Gaza and abuses in the West Bank.

Ten days ago El-Sayed publicly apologized for any misinterpretation people might have placed on remarks he made after a man attacked a synagogue in a Detroit suburb in March. The man, Ayman Mohammad Ghazali, had lost four relatives in an Israeli airstrike on Lebanon the week before.

In a video response at the time, El-Sayed condemned the attack. He added that “hurt people hurt people,” a reference to what happened to Ghazali’s family. Critics accused El-Sayed of justifying Ghazali’s actions.

If you read the transcript of what El-Sayed actually said, it’s clear he was merely trying to explain and give context for the violence. “What I was trying to do was offer context for why it happened, but it wasn’t the time for context,” El-Sayed said in apology. “And you don’t ever want to trample somebody’s pain.”

There is enough pain on all sides—pain for Israelis and Palestinians, for Muslims and Jews. Which is why it’s so important that all of us think clearly and carefully. Being anti-Netanyahu isn’t being anti-Israel, nor is it being antisemitic.

It’s also critically important that the good people of Michigan oppose Mike Rogers, who endorsed and voted for legislation last year that cut Affordable Care Act insurance for millions of Americans, weakened Medicaid and food assistance to less affluent citizens, and provided tax breaks to the very rich.

Rogers has warmly and enthusiastically praised Trump. He’s failed to publicly condemn or even criticize Trump’s bigoted statements about ethnic communities in the United States. He hasn’t said a word against Trump’s unconscionable pardon of the more than 1000 insurrectionists who rioted at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. This includes those found guilty of the most heinous acts, causing grievous bodily harm to law enforcement officers.

My view is we need smart, committed progressives such as Abdul El-Sayed in the Senate. And we need right-wing Trump suckups such as Mike Rogers out of the Senate.


© 2025 Robert Reich

Robert Reich
Robert Reich is professor emeritus of public policy at Berkeley and former US secretary of labor. His latest book is the No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "Coming Up Short."
Full Bio >
El-Sayed Plays ‘The Price Is Wrong’ With Michigan Voters to Expose Cost of Trump Trade Wars

“Come on down! All this could be yours... except the price is WRONG because of Trump’s tariffs.”


US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed played “The Price Is Wrong” with Michigan voters in a video posted online on September 8, 2026.
(Photo: screenshot/@AbdulElSayed/X)

Julia Conley
Sep 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Modeled on the familiar logo of a long-running daytime game show, US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed displayed a hand-drawn picture of a dollar sign along with the words “The Price Is Wrong” in a video posted to his official social media accounts Tuesday—and offered Michigan voters the chance to play his version of the game, inspired by President Donald Trump’s policies.

“This is probably true of everything you’re buying right now,” said El-Sayed, who is running against former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers after winning the Democratic primary election last month, as he pointed to the handmade sign. “We’re going to ask Michiganders about just how much everything has gotten more expensive over the last year because of Trump’s tariffs and his war in Iran.”

First up, a voter learned that a container of 100 Tide detergent pods, which now costs nearly $30, cost just under $22 a year ago at this time—before Trump joined Israel in attacking Iran, leading to the retaliatory measure of Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the resulting spike in oil and gas prices.

“That’s almost a 30% increase in price for the same Tide pods,” said El-Sayed.



A package of Target brand toilet paper cost $6 last year, and another voter guessed it’s currently marked at $8.50—off by 50 cents, said El-Sayed, who revealed the package would now cost $9 at a Target store in Michigan.

Target-branded protein powder cost $40 last year, and Trump’s policies have raised the price to $54 this year, said El-Sayed, while a one-pound bag of coffee beans from Tim Hortons is nearly a dollar more than it was last year, priced now at $9.32.

El-Sayed released the video as Canada imposed its new retaliatory tariffs targeting about $20 billion in US imports, in response to the 50% tariffs Trump announced late last month on a range of Canadian goods including dairy products, paper, and cement.

According to a June poll by Epic-MRA, 63% of Michiganders—including 35% of Republicans—opposed Trump’s tariffs on Canadian goods, which he first announced last year along with levies on numerous other countries that he said had treated the US unfairly in trade.

About three-quarters of voters in that poll said they thought Trump’s tariff policy was fueling higher prices for everyday goods.

The Midwest Economic Policy Institute found in July that due to Michigan’s shared border with Canada and the close ties shared between the auto industries in Michigan and Ontario, Michigan households were paying as much as $3,200 in extra costs due to Trump’s tariffs—about 142% more than the rest of the US.

“Donald Trump is launching this trade war for his own vanity, and he’s asking Michigan families to pay the price,” El-Sayed said in a statement last month. “Trump has been failing Michigan through these chaotic tariffs and bad trade deals for far too long, and Mike Rogers won’t do anything but rubber-stamp them.”

At Michigan Advance, columnist Rick Haglund warned last month that Michigan would likely “pay a steep price for Trump’s reckless actions.”

“Canada is Michigan’s largest trading partner with about $70 billion in goods flowing across their borders in 2024, the latest available data,” said Haglund. “Thousands of jobs are connected to Michigan auto parts manufacturers, farmers, and others who export goods to Canada.”

Trump’s unprovoked war on Iran has also been linked to spiking diesel prices, which is driving up transportation costs—and as a result, consumer prices—for many everyday goods like those featured in El-Sayed’s mock game show.

“Americans are paying way more for everyday goods they have to buy at the grocery store, all because of this insane war that is spiking the price of gas, spiking the price of diesel, spiking the price of your everyday goods,” said El-Sayed. “And now, a trade war that’s expanded with Canada.”

“Americans are sick and tired of playing ‘The Price Is Wrong,’” he added. “I think it’s time for us to play ‘The Price Is Right.’”