Livestock farming poses new challenges for conservation in the Galápagos
A study involving livestock producers in the Galápagos Islands found that the expansion and intensification of livestock farming are associated with perceived negative changes in local biodiversity
image:
A study involving livestock producers in the Galápagos Islands found that the expansion and intensification of livestock farming are associated with perceived negative changes in local biodiversity.
view more
Credit: Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL)
A study published in the journal LAND analyzed how livestock producers on Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos, perceive the relationship between livestock farming and biodiversity. The study was developed through an ongoing process of engagement and collaborative work with livestock producers, strengthened in recent years through outreach activities, knowledge exchange, and joint initiatives with organizations and institutions involved in the agricultural sector. This process made it possible to characterize livestock management systems, identify production practices, and document changes observed by producers in their surrounding environment.
When analyzing the factors associated with these changes, statistically significant associations were identified between the expansion of livestock farming and perceived changes in biodiversity. Likewise, the intensification of livestock production was associated with the perception of declining biodiversity, while deforestation was identified as one of the main factors associated with these transformations.
The length of time producers had been engaged in livestock farming was associated with their perception of changes in native species. However, years of experience in livestock farming were not significantly associated with the general perception that this activity has negative impacts on biodiversity. Similarly, no statistically significant associations were observed between this general perception and producers’ age, educational level, gender, or economic activity.
The results also reveal differences in the types of changes identified by producers. More direct and visible effects, such as the expansion of livestock farming and deforestation, were recognized more clearly than cumulative processes such as soil degradation or declining water quality.
The Galápagos Islands are a territory where production and conservation share a limited amount of space. A large proportion of the terrestrial area consists of protected areas, while human settlements include areas designated for agricultural and livestock activities. On Santa Cruz Island, livestock production is carried out under extensive and semi-intensive systems, with grazing practices based on introduced pasture species.
According to Natacha Fierro Jaramillo, researcher and one of the authors of the study, livestock farming plays a fundamental economic and food-security role for rural families. However, its development must progress in a manner compatible with the conservation of biodiversity and the ecosystems that sustain agricultural production. The challenge, she points out, is to promote integrated alternatives that reconcile production and conservation, recognizing that conservation is an essential component of ensuring the long-term sustainability of production systems.
“Livestock farming is a resource that generates employment and contributes to household food security. We need alternatives that allow this activity to be developed sustainably, without neglecting biodiversity conservation,” the author states.
The producers who participated in the study also provided information on potential measures to reduce the environmental impacts of livestock farming. Among these alternatives, 80% expressed support for subsidies for sustainable practices, while 60% expressed interest in receiving training. The practices with the highest levels of implementation or willingness to adopt them included rotational grazing (27%) and reforestation (25%). Nevertheless, the authors point out that implementing these practices faces economic and institutional constraints.
The researchers further emphasize that the findings should be interpreted as producers’ perceptions rather than as direct measurements of biodiversity. The associations identified do not establish cause-and-effect relationships either. In this regard, the next step is to complement the knowledge developed jointly with producers with measurements that can determine what is actually occurring in the territory.
“Our work made it possible to identify producers’ perceptions. Now we need to determine what is actually happening in the territory: if a practice is affecting water quality, the corresponding analyses should be conducted; changes in animal condition and milk production should be assessed, as well as the amount of carbon being stored in specific production systems.”
The findings correspond to the group of producers and the territorial context considered in the study and therefore cannot be generalized to the entire population of Santa Cruz Island. The researchers propose that future studies incorporate ecological measurements and long-term monitoring, including spatial analyses, to complement the knowledge generated from producers’ experiences and deepen understanding of the relationship between livestock practices and biodiversity conservation.
Journal
Land
Method of Research
Survey
Subject of Research
People
Article Title
Perceptions of the Effects of Livestock Farming on Biodiversity: Insights from a Study in the Galápagos Islands

