Wednesday, July 22, 2026

 


Legalization of sports betting has led to households saving significantly less money



Households that had little savings to begin with added credit card debt and took on larger loan payments to keep betting





Brigham Young University

Photo illustration of individual engaging in sports betting 

image: 

New research from Brigham Young University finds the legalization of sports betting has lead to US households to save less money.

view more 

Credit: BYU Photo






As legalized sports betting becomes increasingly accessible with mobile apps such as DraftKings and FanDuel, a new study from BYU Finance professors is finding people are saving less to fuel gambling habits.

The research, authored by BYU Marriott School of Business professors Mark Johnson and Jason Kotter, and published in the Journal of Financial Economics, analyzes transaction data from 184,000 households. They found households cut their net investment in brokerage accounts by 20% following the legalization of sports betting. And the heaviest bettors cut their investment deposits by more than half: for every dollar they put into a betting app, roughly 20 cents never made it into long-term savings.

In other words, more and more people — including those who had little savings to begin with — are treating gambling as an investment, even though the data shows sports betting is a terrible financial strategy.

“If you have a diversified investment portfolio like an S&P index, it consistently makes money over a long period,” Kotter said. “With sports betting, you might win occasionally, but if you look over a window of six months or longer, only a tiny fraction of people do better than break even. If you think you are going to make a lot of money betting, you are expecting to be an extreme exception in the data.”

Johnson and Kotter expected to see betting displace other entertainment spending — fewer concert tickets, fewer nights out — not from funds they otherwise would have saved or invested. Instead they found it’s increasingly common that someone will cut a quarterly $200 Vanguard deposit in half in order to fuel a FanDuel account.

The revoke of the federal ban on sports betting changed the game, pairing sports betting as both a form of entertainment and a possibility for legal economic gain. Tracking line-ups and player progression has evolved from a fun pastime to a seemingly profitable venture.

“Many people consume sports and feel like they are experts on their favorite teams or players,” Kotter said. “This can make them overconfident, leading them to believe they have an informational advantage and a potentially profitable strategy. But very few bettors make money."

The researchers discovered that bettors see online sports betting as a form of investment — more sure or as sure of a money maker as traditional investments. This is especially true, they found, when general public expectations for the economy are low and people are worried that investing won’t have the same returns.

“You see people talking about buying equity in the stock market as if it's a gamble,” Kotter said. “Particularly for younger people, accumulating the kind of wealth you might need to buy a house feels so far out of reach. So sports betting also becomes about the potentially immense returns. You take a long shot bet you're almost surely going to lose, but if you win, it's big.”

Not only are bettors saving less, but they’re actually spending more. Johnson and Kotter found that frequent bettors also increased spending in sports-adjacent categories like restaurants, bars, and cable television, further blurring the line between entertainment and investment.

“It creates an exacerbating effect where they not only draw money from investment accounts but also spend more in places they wouldn't have without the legalization of sports betting,” Johnson said. “They view it as both entertainment and investing; they go to a restaurant with friends to watch the game and discuss their bets together.”

For Johnson and Kotter, their findings reflect a need to protect families and teach bettors to adapt to the possible detrimental effects of sports betting legalization and online accessibility.

“We are not going to get rid of sports betting nationwide,” Kotter said. “So the conversation must focus on alleviating the worst harms. We need to break the mental link between sports betting and good financial returns by helping people understand the actual data and probabilities of making money.”

Professors Scott Baker of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Justin Balthrup at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Kevin Pisciotta of The University of Kansas served as co-authors on the study.

 

2 million cars with anti-theft systems installed by dealers are at higher risk of theft



A vulnerability in systems installed by dealers in Southern California since 2017 is getting fixed by the system manufacturer. But car owners need to be aware.



University of California - San Diego

KARR sticker 

image: 

This sticker, found on cars sold after 2017 on the driver’s side window, indicates that the vehicle likely has had a vulnerable system installed by a dealer. 


 

view more 

Credit: David Baillot/University of California San Diego/Jacobs School of Engineering







Video: https://youtu.be/xS_4dNRGkoA?si=olL6w75Gj9l0DQo8

At least 2.2 million cars on the road today are vulnerable to an attack that allows thieves to lock and unlock doors and immobilize vehicle engines remotely via a Bluetooth connection, computer scientists at the University of California San Diego have found. 

Attackers can get access to cars from as far as five yards away. Most of the vulnerable vehicles were bought at Honda, Toyota, Mazda, Ford, and Jeep dealerships in Southern California from 2017 to today. But because these vehicles are resold on the second-hand market, several hundred thousand vulnerable vehicles can also be found throughout the United States, Canada and even as far as Japan. Many vulnerable cars display a sticker with the word “KARR” or “SWDS” on the driver’s-side window. 

The vulnerability is due to a device controlled via a smartphone app that is typically installed by dealerships to manage vehicle inventory and prevent theft. The device, installed underneath the bottom of the dashboard on the driver’s side, connects vehicle and app via Bluetooth. The app makes the device perform functions similar to a key fob: lock and unlock doors as well as honk a horn and flash headlights as a warning. In addition, the device can prevent the car from starting as long as the car isn’t already running. 

All KARR-SWDS devices rely on the same secure key – meaning that once the researchers cracked that key, they had access to all the cars equipped with these devices. It’s a bit like setting all passwords for a line of devices to 1234 and making it impossible to change the password. 

When a dealership sells a vehicle, they market the device and app as a paid upgrade – an anti-theft tool as well as a tool to control the car via an app. Even if the buyer declines the upgrade, the device remains active, still leaving the vehicle vulnerable to an attacker in certain situations. 

The company manufacturing these devices, Acrisure, released a patch to fix the vulnerability on July 20, 2026. The fix requires downloading an app. “Many car owners don’t even know that their vehicle is vulnerable. So we wanted to make sure they were aware by publishing this study,” said Aaron Schulman, a professor in the UC San Diego Department of Computer Science and Engineering, and one of the study’s senior authors.

The vulnerability could allow thieves to steal cars more easily. “Instead of smashing a window to get access to a vehicle, thieves could simply connect remotely via Bluetooth to the device inside the vehicle, and make it unlock car doors,” said Jerry Yu, a computer science Ph.D. student in Schulman’s research group at UC San Diego and the paper’s co-first author. Once the car is unlocked, attackers can use a variety of tools available to locksmiths to then start the car and drive away. 

The researchers, led by Schulman, will detail how they discovered the vulnerability and reverse-engineered it at the DEF CON conference Aug. 9 in Las Vegas and the USENIX Security conference Aug. 12 in Baltimore, Md. 

In the study, researchers identified at least 1.4 million vulnerable vehicles, but further analysis by the UC San Diego researchers increased that number to an estimated 2.2 million – at least. 

Different levels of vulnerability

In addition to Acrisure, Rockledge, a car security and insurance company, makes similar devices. The researchers found these devices may also be vulnerable, but are more difficult to attack. An attacker would need to be there when a driver uses these systems to intercept and record their digital interactions, and then play those interactions back to get access to the user’s vehicle. Researchers were unable however to validate these findings with Rockledge as the company had not yet responded to the researchers’ disclosure as of this writing. 

The research team is careful not to disclose the details of how they reverse-engineered the systems so their work can’t be replicated by thieves. Researchers also disclosed the vulnerabilities to all relevant manufacturers and vendors as well as to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 

How to fix the vulnerability? 

“Removing the devices is not trivial. You have to open up the dashboard and cut and reconnect the wires that are deeply intertwined with the car’s computers and ignition system,” said Yibo Wei, who is also a computer science Ph.D. student  in Schulman’s group at UC San Diego and the paper’s co-first author. 

To fix the vulnerability non-invasively, the device firmware – the software that controls the hardware – needs to be updated. On July 20, KARR-SWDS maker Acrisure announced that it has released a firmware update to fix the issue. The update needs to be made by the vehicle owner via the KARR app. For more information visit www.KARRsecurity.com  

But to truly make sure similar vulnerabilities do not occur in the future, researchers suggest that physical interaction – like pressing a button inside a car – be required when a new smartphone connects with these Bluetooth-based security systems. 

How did the researchers discover the vulnerability? 
It all started in 2018 when researchers led by former UC San Diego computer science Ph.D. student Nishant Baskar found Bluetooth fingerprints they didn’t recognize while hunting for devices called credit card skimmers, which criminals install in gas pumps to steal consumer credit and debit card data. 

After a fair bit of research, they were able to connect the Bluetooth fingerprints to the devices manufactured by Acrisure and Rockledge. They then set out to test whether the devices were secure, as part of a broader research effort to understand cybersecurity in Bluetooth devices. 

Researchers also found that public databases store location information about vehicles equipped with these devices. This in turn, would allow attackers to track specific vehicles they want to break into. 

The research was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (grant no. CNS-2239163).

BLE Theft Auto: Evaluating the Security of Aftermarket BLE-based Automotive Remote Control Systems 

Jerry Yu, Yibo Wei, Sumanth Rao, Mohak Vaswani, Jefferson Chien, Nishant Bhaskar and  Aaron Schulman, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, UC San Diego, Christian Dameff, UC San Diego Health


This button is part of the KARR system. If it is installed in your car at the bottom of the dashboard, your car is likely vulnerable to the attack the researchers have discovered. 


Student with app used to exploit the vulnerability 

Yibo Wei, a Ph.D. student at UC San Diego and one of the paper’s co-first authors, holds up a phone equipped with an app he built to exploit the vulnerability the researchers discovered and gain unauthorized access to a car. 

This button is part of the KARR system. If it is installed in your car at the bottom of the dashboard, your car is likely vulnerable to the attack the researchers have discovered. 

 

Credit

David Baillot/University of California San Diego/Jacobs School of Engineering

 

1 in 4 American workers report staying in unwanted jobs for health insurance


Employees reporting “job lock” increased by a third since 2021, with highest rates among women and people with chronic conditions




West Health Institute





WASHINGTON, D.C. — July 22, 2026 — Nearly one in four U.S. workers (24%) say they are currently in a job they want to quit but stay with their employer for the health insurance, according to new research from the West Health-Gallup Center on Healthcare in America. The share of workers experiencing “job lock” has been increasing steadily, rising eight percentage points since 2021, suggesting health insurance coverage is becoming a major consideration for career decisions and economic mobility.

The numbers run higher for workers holding personal or household medical debt (20%) who are more than twice as likely to stay in unwanted jobs because they fear losing their health insurance (44% vs. 21%). People who borrowed money in the past year were also significantly more likely to report job lock (37% vs. 22%).

Beyond current debt holders or new borrowers, nearly half (48%) of Americans who consider healthcare costs a major financial burden also find themselves locked in jobs they do not want out of fear something might happen that would require health insurance. The same is true for a majority of workers (53%) who report experiencing “a lot” of daily stress related to the cost of healthcare.

“That so many Americans feel compelled to stay in jobs they no longer want simply to keep their health insurance underscores how healthcare affordability influences decisions far beyond any immediate or future illness or condition,” said Tim Lash, President, West Health Policy Center, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization focused on healthcare and aging policy. “No one should have to choose between seeking a better opportunity or maintaining access to health insurance. Yet for millions of Americans, the high cost of healthcare has left them facing this exact choice.”

According to data from the recent West Health-Gallup Affordability Index, just 49% of U.S. adults say they can afford access to quality care and have been able to pay for physician and clinic visits and prescription drugs in recent months — the first time in five years that fewer than half of Americans report an ability to consistently afford healthcare.

Chronic Conditions Increase Reliance on Employer Coverage

Workers with chronic health conditions experience job lock at higher levels than healthier workers (29% vs.17%), with the incidence of job lock increasing as a person’s number of chronic conditions increases. More than 40% of workers with three or more chronic conditions report remaining in unwanted jobs for insurance coverage.

Elevated rates are also seen among those with conditions that often require ongoing or intensive treatment, such as asthma (29%) and immune-compromising conditions (36%). Workers with depression and anxiety also report higher-than-average levels of job lock (35% and 33%, respectively).

 

 

Women More Likely to Experience Job Lock

Women are more likely to report staying in a job they would prefer to leave to maintain their health insurance. Three in 10 report this situation, compared with 20% of men. The gender gap coincides with broader disparities in healthcare-related burdens. Women are more likely to report healthcare-related financial stress (56%), medical debt (22%) and multiple chronic conditions (66%), all factors that may contribute to higher rates of job lock.

"Health insurance continues to play an important role in how Americans navigate the labor market,” said Joe Daly, Global Managing Partner at Gallup. “As job lock has become more common among workers with employer-sponsored coverage since 2021, the findings offer insight into how healthcare benefits may factor into decisions about staying in a job or pursuing other opportunities."

Methodology

For data from 2025, results are based on a Gallup Panel study conducted Oct. 27-Dec. 22, 2025, and completed by 5,660 U.S. adults ages 18 and older who are members of the Gallup Panel. The sample for this study was weighted to be demographically representative of the U.S. adult population using the most recent Current Population Survey figures. For results based on this sample, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±2.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Margins of error are higher for subsamples. For data from 2021, results are based on a similar survey (n=4,843) conducted Sept. 27-30 and Oct. 18-21, 2021.

About the West Health-Gallup Center on Healthcare in America

The Center on Healthcare in America is a joint initiative from West Health and Gallup dedicated to elevating the voices and experiences of Americans within the healthcare system. Through rigorous research and human-centered storytelling, the Center aims to drive actionable insights and inform policy solutions nationwide. Visit www.westhealth.gallup.com.

About West Health

Solely funded by philanthropists Gary and Mary West, West Health is a family of nonprofit and nonpartisan organizations that include the Gary and Mary West Foundation and Gary and Mary West Health Institute in San Diego and the Gary and Mary West Health Policy Center in Washington, D.C. West Health is dedicated to lowering healthcare costs to enable seniors to successfully age in place with access to high-quality and affordable health and support services that preserve and protect their dignity, quality of life and independence. Learn more at westhealth.org.

About Gallup

Gallup delivers analytics and advice to help leaders and organizations solve their most pressing problems. Combining 90 years of experience with its global reach, Gallup knows more about the attitudes and behaviors of employees, customers, students and citizens than any other organization in the world.

###



 

Does debt increase suicide risk?




Wiley






In a study published in Economic Inquiry that analyzed debt and income across US counties at the onset of the Great Recession in 2008, investigators have uncovered evidence that debt may impact the likelihood of suicide.

When the 2008 Financial Crisis hit, US households had accumulated record levels of debt, and many became unable to repay these loans as economic activity and asset prices declined. In the study, more indebted counties saw a significant rise in suicide rates. Suicide rates doubled for men and tripled for adults aged 40–64 years in high-debt counties. The researchers noted that these patterns align with financial responsibilities, with men typically being primary borrowers on mortgages, and middle-aged adults holding the most secured debt. Similar effects were not seen during the 2001 recession, when household debt was not a central issue, confirming that unemployment alone cannot explain the results.

“The identification of the direct effect of debt on suicide is important for policy design, as interventions targeting unemployment may fail to address mental health impacts stemming from the debt burden of shocks,” said corresponding author Scott Abrahams, PhD, of Louisiana State University.

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecin.70077

 

Additional Information
NOTE:
The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
Published since 1962, Economic Inquiry is a highly regarded scholarly journal in economics publishing articles of general interest across the profession. Quality research that is accessible to a broad range of economists is the primary focus of the journal. Join our long list of prestigious authors, including more than 20 Nobel laureates.

About Wiley      
Wiley is a global leader in authoritative content and research intelligence for the advancement of scientific discovery, innovation, and learning. With more than 200 years at the center of the scholarly ecosystem, Wiley combines trusted publishing heritage with AI-powered platforms to transform how knowledge is discovered, accessed, and applied. From individual researchers and students to Fortune 500 R&D teams, Wiley enables the transformation of scientific breakthroughs into real-world impact. From knowledge to impact—Wiley is redefining what's possible in science and learning. Visit us at Wiley.com and Investors.Wiley.com. Follow us on Facebook, X, LinkedIn and Instagram.

 

Carbon footprint of metal production could be more than 10 times higher than estimated


Startling result in the first comprehensive quantification of CO2 emissions from acid mine drainage neutralization for metal mining in academic peer reviewed literature. 



University of St. Andrews

Acid mine drainage 

image: 

Acid mine drainage on the Rio Tinto in southern Spain

view more 

Credit: Luke Brigstock





New Research from the University of St Andrews has discovered that Metal production carbon footprints could be more than 10 times higher than previously estimated, with serious implications for the ambition to reach net zero. 

Published today in Environmental Science and Technology, this groundbreaking work is the first comprehensive quantification of CO2 emissions from acid mine drainage neutralization for metal mining in academic peer reviewed literature.    

Acid mine drainage is a common and well known side effect of mining, occurring when waters that drain mining areas become acidic and full of toxic metals . It occurs when mining digs up a certain type of mineral (metal sulphides) that then react with oxygen rich surface waters. The subsequent interaction of these acidic waters with the surrounding environment can lead to chemical reactions that release CO2. Efforts to remediate this pollution issue often also involve reacting acid mine drainage with minerals in engineered settings, again releasing CO2. This chemistry is already known, but to date, no one had quantified the size of this CO2 emission source in detail. 

Researchers studied an area of 82 historic or currently working mines in South East Spain that is considered to generate the highest rates of acid mine drainage in the world. They measured the chemistry of rivers draining this region to quantify the amount of acid mine drainage generated and how it is neutralized, which in turn allows estimation of the CO2 flux. Researchers also measured how the chemistry of these rivers changes as they mix with alkaline seawater in the downstream estuary, again leading to CO2 emissions. This was further backed up with laboratory experiments simulating river water/seawater mixing. 

Results showed that when all this was considered, Acid mine drainage neutralization to date has emitted a similar amount of CO2 as estimated for conventional copper production carbon footprints from this region   

However, the problem is further compounded as acid mine drainage emissions continue to occur for a very long time after the mining activity is finished. This is because the metal sulfide minerals dug up during mining can take centuries to millennia to fully react with oxygen rich surface waters, continuing to make acid mine drainage for a long time into the future.  

The senior author of the project Dr Luke Brigstock from the School of Earth and Environmental Science , said: “This is a shocking result. We estimate that the full emission budget for acid mine drainage by the time all the extracted sulfides have 'weathered' to produce acid mine drainage – will be more than 10 times higher than conventional carbon footprints for copper production. This presents a challenge for reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions given the need for increased metal production to supply green technologies. It’s essential that we now look at changing how acid mine drainage is remediated to reduce these emissions” 

This poorly accounted for emission source will dominate the total carbon footprint of copper production in this region in the long run.  While it is likely that the size of this emission source will be lower in other mining regions, these results highlight the importance of accounting for this emission source across the metal mining sector. 

Metal mining is set to rise in the future to support the green transition. Given the role of metal production in supply 'green technologies' - solar, wind, boosting electrification of the grid etc - decarbonizing the metal production sector is a key part of strategies to get to net zero. This wider context gives added motivation to quantifying this poorly known metal mining emission source. 

  ENDS 

Acid mine drainage 

Acid mine drainage on the Rio Tinto

Acid mine drainage 

Effects of mining on the Rio Tinto

Credit

Luke Brigstock