Myanmar grieves after young anti-coup protester's death
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Friday, February 19, 2021
Issued on: 19/02/2021 -
Tbilisi (AFP)
Police in Georgia's capital Tbilisi on Friday detained dozens of pro-opposition demonstrators demanding snap polls, as a political crisis sparked by last year's elections deepened.
Hundreds of protesters rallied outside parliament to back the opposition's calls for fresh elections after Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia resigned Thursday over the ruling party's plans to arrest a top opposition leader.
The move to detain Nika Melia -- the chairman of the United National Movement (UNM) of exiled ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili -- sparked outrage among the opposition and warnings from the Caucasus nation's Western allies.
Several protesters were beaten by police and taken away in ambulances, according to footage aired by Formula TV.
"Police lawlessness has no limits," one of the UNM leaders, Levan Khabeishvili, told journalists at Friday's rally.
"They resort to repressions despite the opposition's calls to de-escalate political confrontation," he added.
A court order to place Melia in pre-trial detention has raised the stakes in the crisis over October's parliamentary elections, which the opposition denounced as rigged after the ruling Georgian Dream party claimed a narrow victory.
Leaders of all of the country's opposition parties have camped out at the UNM headquarters in Tbilisi since Wednesday, vowing to obstruct police plans to arrest Melia.
In his resignation statement, Gakharia said a police raid on the UNM headquarters would "pose a risk to the health and lives of our citizens."
The United States and European Union have expressed concerns over the move, calling on the ex-Soviet country's government to resolve the crisis peacefully and ensure its judicial system stays free of political bias.
© 2021 AFP
Thai PM faces no-confidence debate inside and outside parliament
Issued on: 19/02/2021 -
Bangkok (AFP)
Protestors outside Thailand's parliament held their own version of a no-confidence debate against Premier Prayut Chan-O-Cha Friday night, as inside, opposition MPs rained a torrent of criticism upon his administration.
Friday marked the final day of a four-day no-confidence debate against former coup leader Prayut and his cabinet, and MPs will vote Saturday on their fate.
Prayut -- whose coalition government holds a majority -- is expected to survive the vote, but the proceedings could set off internal struggles within his party.
Activists from Thailand's youth-led pro-democracy movement decided to set up their own debate right by the parliament's entrance, hoisting portraits of Prayut and his ministers up on a truck.
Rally organisers set up a projection screen which played out the events going on inside the building.
"The opposition MPs weren't able to speak about everything in the parliament," said an 18-year-old protester who would only give his name as Petch.
"That's why we need to double down the efforts to speak about how bad the government has been doing."
Hundreds of protesters young and old brought pots and pans to create a cacophony of dissent -- a tactic borrowed from neighbouring Myanmar where an anti-coup movement is agitating against a military junta.
Dozens of riot police stood watch nearby, with a water cannon truck at the ready.
A woman wore a cauldron as a hat, with the words "Abolish 112" scrawled on it -- in reference to Thailand's draconian lese majeste law which shields the monarchy from criticism.
So far, more than 50 activists have been charged under the law since the movement kicked off in mid-July, though only four prominent leaders have been detained.
"We need to come out so that the key activists being detained in jail did not do everything in vain," said 13-year-old Iam.
- Covid-hit economy -
Besides demanding royal reforms -- once a taboo subject which has been pushed into public attention by the movement -- the protesters are also calling for the resignation of Prayut.
The former army general led a 2014 coup, and renewed his lease on power after elections in 2019 that were governed under a military-scripted constitution.
Critics say his administration -- staffed with former generals -- is unfit to run a country whose already faltering economy has been further weakened by pandemic-spurred border closures.
This week saw opposition MPs accuse Prayut and Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul of being responsible for a new wave of coronavirus that emerged in Thailand in December.
"It was their negligence in allowing illegal gambling and illegal border crossing to happen," said Move Forward Party MP Viroj Lakkana-adisorn.
Issued on: 19/02/2021 -
Text by: FRANCE 24
Algeria on Friday released a dozen "Hirak" protest movement activists from jail, the first batch freed under presidential pardons issued ahead of the second anniversary of a popular uprising.
A day after Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune dissolved the lower house of parliament and called early legislative elections, the National Committee for the Liberation of Prisoners (CNLD), a rights group, on Friday announced the release of dozens of prisoners in a gesture of appeasement to the "Hirak" protest movement.
The "Hirak", meaning "movement" in Arabic, swept former strongman Abdelaziz Bouteflika from power in 2019, but continued after his fall.
In his speech late Thursday, Tebboune said around 55 to 60 Hirak members would benefit from an amnesty, with their release to start immediately.
Around 70 people are currently in prison over their links with the Hirak movement or other peaceful opposition political activity, according to the CNLD.
Many of them were arrested for posting anti-government posts on social media.
The presidency said the pardon would cover "perpetrators of crimes related to information and communication technologies".
Jubilation outside prisons
On Friday, journalists and families gathered to wait for prisoners to be freed outside the jail in Kolea, a town 20 kilometres (12 miles) west of the capital Algiers.
Among the prisoners held in Kolea is journalist Khaled Drareni, sentenced to two years in prison in September, and who has become a symbol of the fight for press freedom in Algeria.
Tebboune's initiative comes on the eve of the Hirak's second anniversary on February 22, demanding a sweeping overhaul of the ruling system in place since Algeria's independence from France in 1962.
The unprecedented protest movement only suspended its rallies in March last year as the novel coronavirus reached the North African country.
Algeria is facing political and economic crises, with the pandemic adding to the woes of an oil-dependent economy.
On Tuesday, thousands of Algerian rallied in the northern town of Kherrata, where the first major protest erupted in 2019 against Bouteflika's bid for a fifth presidential term.
Protesters demanded "the fall of the regime" and "the release of prisoners of conscience".
(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
Twinkle Ghosh 20 hrs ago
Facebook has blocked users in Australia from viewing or sharing news on the social media platform.
The move was triggered by Australia joining France and other governments in pushing Google, Facebook and other internet giants to pay publishers for news content.
While Google, a unit of Alphabet Inc., announced agreements to pay publishers in Australia, Facebook announced Thursday that it was blocking users in Australia from viewing or spreading news on its platform.
Read more: Facebook says users in Australia can no longer view, share news content
This comes on the heels of Ottawa planning to introduce similar legislation this year and could spell a similar fate for Canadian users.
Play Video
Liberals propose new Canadian Broadcast Act rules for online streaming platforms
Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault has made it clear that he intends to introduce a “made-in Canada” plan by summer that includes payment for news content.
“News is not free and has never been,” he said earlier this month.
“Our position is clear: publishers must be adequately compensated for their work and we will support them as they deliver essential information for the benefit of our democracy and the health and well-being of our communities.”
While the tech giants have played a positive role in making news accessible, Guilbeault said, “we must address the market imbalance between news media organizations and those who benefit from their work.”
The minister further assured reporters Thursday that Canada will make Facebook Inc pay for news content.
"Canada is at the forefront of this battle ... we are really among the first group of countries around the world that are doing this," he told reporters.
How does this affect Canada?
Last year, Canadian media organizations warned of a potential market failure without government action. They said the Australian approach would permit publishers to recover C$620 million a year. Without action, they warned, Canada would lose 700 print journalism jobs out of 3,100 total.
Guilbeault said Canada could adopt the Australian model, which requires Facebook and Google to reach deals to pay news outlets whose links drive activity on their services, or agree on a price through binding arbitration.
Another option is to follow the example of France, which requires large tech platforms to open talks with publishers seeking remuneration for use of news content.
"We are working to see which model would be the most appropriate," he said, adding he spoke last week to his French, Australian, German and Finnish counterparts about working together on ensuring fair compensation for web content.
Play
"Heritage minister says Canadian government has ‘no intention’ to regulate news content: Yale report"
"I suspect that soon we will have five, 10, 15 countries adopting similar rules ... is Facebook going to cut ties with Germany, with France?" he asked, saying that at some point Facebook's approach would become "totally unsustainable".
University of Toronto professor Megan Boler, who specializes in social media, said the Facebook action marked a turning point which would require a common international approach.
"We could actually see a coalition, a united front against this monopoly, which could be very powerful," she said in a phone interview.
This week, Facebook said news makes up less than 4% of content people see on the platform but contended that it helped Australian publishers generate about AU $407 million last year.
Google has signed 500 deals worth around $1 billion over three years with publishers around the world for its new News Showcase service and is in talks with Canadian companies.
Guilbeault said Google would still be subject to the new Canadian new law, since Ottawa wanted an approach that was fair, transparent and predictable.
"What's to say that Google - tomorrow, six months, a year from now - doesn't change its mind and says its doesn't want to do that any more?" he said.
Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in Internet and e-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, said Canada should aspire to Google's approach, where companies put money into content that provided added value.
"If we follow the Australian model ... we'll find ourself in much the same spot," he said by phone. "Everybody loses. The media organizations lose ... Facebook loses."
Kevin Chan, head of public policy for Facebook in Canada, said there were "other options to support news in Canada that will more fairly benefit publishers of all sizes".
The move, however, while sure to push more money into a struggling news industry, could also create a bone of contention with some of the bigwigs of the tech industry, much like it has in Australia.
What exactly is happening in Australia?
Facing a proposed law to compel internet companies to pay news organizations, Google has announced deals with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. and Seven West Media. No financial details were released. The Australian Broadcasting Corp. is in negotiations.
Google accounts for 53 per cent of Australian online advertising revenue and Facebook sits at 23 per cent, according to Treasurer Josh Frydenberg.
Read more: Facebook says it’s no longer sustainable for social media giants to self-police content
Google had threatened to make its search engine unavailable in Australia in response to the legislation, which would create a panel to make pricing decisions on news.
On Thursday, Facebook responded by blocking users from accessing and sharing Australian news.
Facebook said the proposed law “ignores the realities” of its relationship with publishers that use its service to “share news content.” That was despite Frydenberg saying this week Google and Facebook “do want to enter into these commercial arrangements.”
What does this mean for the public?
Google’s agreement means a new revenue stream for news outfits, but whether that translates into more coverage for readers, viewers and listeners is unclear.
The union for Australian journalists is calling on media companies to make sure online revenue goes into news gathering.
"Facebook calls for increased content regulation in Canada"
“Any monies from these deals need to end up in the newsroom, not the boardroom,” said Marcus Strom, president of the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance. “We will be pressing the case for transparency on how these funds are spent.”
What is happening in other countries?
Australia’s proposed law would be the first of its kind, but other governments also are pressuring Google, Facebook and other internet companies to pay news outlets and other publishers for material.
In Europe, Google had to negotiate with French publishers after a court last year upheld an order saying such agreements were required by a 2019 European Union copyright directive.
France is the first government to enforce the rules, but the decision suggests Google, Facebook and other companies will face similar requirements in other parts of the 27-nation trade bloc.
Google and a group of French publishers have announced a framework agreement for the American company to negotiate licensing deals with individual publishers. The company has deals with outlets including the newspaper Le Monde and the weekly magazine l’Obs.
Last year, Facebook announced it would pay U.S. news organizations including The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and USA Today for headlines. No financial details were released.
In Spain, Google shut down its news website after a 2014 law required it to pay publishers.
Why does this matter?
Developments in Australia and Europe suggest the financial balance between multibillion-dollar internet companies and news organizations might be shifting.
Australia is responding to complaints internet companies should share advertising and other revenue connected to news reports, magazine articles and other content that appears on their websites or is shared by users.
Read more: Facebook says it’s reducing political content for some users in Canada, other countries
The government acted after its competition regulator tried and failed to negotiate a voluntary payment plan with Google. The proposed law would create a panel to make binding decisions on the price of news reports to help give individual publishers more negotiating leverage with global internet companies.
In the meantime, access occasionally could suffer: Facebook’s move Thursday initially blocked some Australian commercial and government communications pages.
With files from Reuters and AP
|
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/environment/three-quarters-of-the-usa-is-covered-in-snow-most-in-18-years/article/585647#ixzz6mvpV37HE
|
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/belarus-reporter-doctor-on-trial-after-protester-s-death/article/585754#ixzz6mvojMemV
|
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/scientists-and-indigenous-people-unite-to-save-colombian-condor/article/585606#ixzz6mvmCisFi
|
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/air-pollution-caused-160-000-deaths-in-big-cities-last-year-ngo/article/585676#ixzz6mvkqB06x
By Tim Sandle yesterday in Technology
For a country that allegedly has no cases of COVID-19, it is interesting to see the apparent attack by the state upon the drug company Pfizer with the aim to acquire coronavirus vaccine technology.
North Korean hackers have attempted to break into the computer systems of Pfizer, according to The Washington Post. This was due to a search for information on the COVID-19 vaccine and treatment technology, according to a South Korean lawmaker. Pfizer has not commented on the situation, leaving details vague on when the hack occurred or how successful the hackers might have been.
Looking at the issue for Digital Journal is Rusty Carter, Chief Product Officer of LogRhythm.
Carter says that the issue shows the extent of the threat that rogue states face: “This is a high-profile reminder that espionage is both prevalent and an existential threat to businesses across industries. Within the current global economy, that can include state sponsored activities to extract proprietary and business critical data."
There is also a focus on the healthcare sector, as Carer notes: "No industry is more visible right now than biotech and vaccine development companies, though many others continue to be rich targets due to their profitable industries. This type of espionage and proprietary information loss is a critical threat to organizations worldwide."
In terms of the specific issue, Carter states: "Unfortunately, it is not a surprise that North Korea has attempted to hack a pharmaceutical company like Pfizer in order to obtain important information about the development of the COVID-19 vaccine and treatment technology. Nation-states have been targeting the U.S. for decades, but SolarWinds was a clear escalation. Now, the rules of engagement are set and companies need to be aware that multiple nations, including North Korea, possess similar capabilities and are targeting organizations that hold powerful information, especially as it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic.
While it is still unclear how successful these hackers were, it does serve as an important reminder that attacks on healthcare organizations and other critical infrastructure are a very real threat. Organizations must be hyperaware of risks posed by nation-states and not just national hackers and groups."
Cater also considers what the attackers could be doing with these types of data: "Securing proprietary information and assets requires a number of physical and electronic measures, and common to all security and risk management programs is strong detection and response capabilities. Especially in today’s virtual world, detecting and responding to sophisticated network attacks is crucial.”
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/tech-and-science/technology/looking-behind-the-north-korea-cyberattack-on-pfizer/article/585686#ixzz6mvjSEfRy