Tuesday, September 09, 2025

Google to obey South Korean order to blur satellite images on maps


By AFP
September 9, 2025


Image: — AFP/File Chris DELMAS

Google said on Tuesday that it would comply with the South Korean government’s demand to blur sensitive satellite images on its mapping services, paving the way for the US tech giant to compete better with local navigation platforms.

South Korea is one of the few places in the world, like Russia and China, where Google Maps does not fully function.

That is because South Korean laws require that companies store core geospatial data locally, something Google has long refused to do.

As a result, domestic technology firms like Naver and Kakao have cornered the market for mapping services, making navigation harder for foreign visitors unfamiliar with their platforms.

Google confirmed for the first time on Tuesday that it would abide by Seoul’s demand.

“We have already confirmed our commitment with the government to blur satellite images as required and we’ll be exploring acquiring imagery from approved Korean third parties where appropriate,” Google Vice President Cris Turner told reporters.

The announcement suggests the conclusion of a nearly two-decade dispute in which Google has argued for access to detailed South Korean maps to offer full walking and driving directions, only for Seoul to refuse to export that data for national security reasons.

Turner added that Google would “invest a lot of time and resources” to remove the coordinates of security facilities from its maps.

Google Maps access has been raised in South Korea’s recent trade talks with the United States, where Seoul managed to secure a last-minute tariff reduction from President Donald Trump.

The South Korean presidential office said that high-precision map data was among the topics that the trade minister had discussed “most extensively” with their US counterpart.

But it added that there had been “no additional concession on our part in that area”.

Industry sources told AFP on Tuesday that South Korean officials are still in talks with Washington, with the possible export of high-precision maps still on the agenda.
Former Meta researchers testify company buried child safety studies


By AFP
September 9, 2025


Copyright AFP Brendan SMIALOWSKI

Meta systematically suppressed internal research highlighting serious child safety risks on its virtual reality platforms, according to allegations from current and former employees who testified to Congress on Tuesday.

The social media giant deployed lawyers to screen, edit and sometimes veto sensitive safety research after facing congressional scrutiny in 2021, six researchers alleged.

In their allegations, first revealed in the Washington Post, the whistleblowers claim Meta’s legal team sought to “establish plausible deniability” about negative effects of the company’s VR products on young users.

Though a major money loser for the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, Meta is a leading force in the VR industry, primarily through its Quest lineup of devices, including the successful Quest 3.

“Meta is aware that its VR platform is full of underage children. Meta purposely turns a blind eye to this knowledge, despite it being obvious to anyone using their products,” said former Meta researcher Cayce Savage at the US Senate hearing.

According to the Post, internal documents show that after former Meta product manager Frances Haugen leaked damaging information about the company’s policies on content issues, the company imposed new rules on any research into “sensitive” topics including children, gender, race and harassment.

This included advice to researchers to “be mindful” about how they framed studies, avoiding terms like “illegal” or saying something “violates” specific laws.

But the documents reveal employees repeatedly warned that children under 13 were bypassing age restrictions to use Meta’s VR services, despite terms of service limiting access to users 13 and older.

As early as 2017, one employee estimated that in some virtual rooms as many as 80 to 90 percent of users were underage, warning: “This is the kind of thing that eventually makes headlines — in a really bad way.”

Speaking to the Post, Meta vehemently denied the allegations, with spokeswoman Dani Lever calling them a “predetermined and false narrative” based on cherry-picked examples.

“We stand by our research team’s excellent work and are dismayed by these mischaracterizations of the team’s efforts,” Lever said, noting the company has developed various safety protections for young users.

Researcher Jason Sattizahn told the Senate hearing that it was “very clear that Meta is incapable of change without being forced by Congress.”

“Whether it’s engagement or profits at any cost, they have, frankly, had unearned opportunities to correct their behavior, and they have not,” Sattizahn told senators.


Vancouver-based Teck Resources and Anglo American announce merger

LARGEST MINING MERGER IN DECADES


By The Canadian Press
September 09, 2025 

The Teck Resources logo is seen on a podium before the company's special meeting of shareholders, in Vancouver, B.C., on April 26, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

VANCOUVER — Vancouver-based Teck Resources Ltd. and Anglo American plc have announced an agreement to merge their operations.

A statement from the two mining and natural resources companies released on Monday night says they will form the Anglo Teck group.

The release says the “merger of equals” will create a company that will be a global critical minerals champion and one of the world’s largest producers of copper.


The two companies are committing to having Anglo Teck’s global headquarters in Vancouver, with corporate offices in London and Johannesburg.

Canada’s Minister of Industry Melanie Joly said in a social media post that the federal government will address several issues as it considers the merger, including the combined firm’s pledge to have its senior leadership based in and reside in Canada.


Teck Resources and Anglo American expect the merger to be completed in the next 12 to 18 months

Anglo American, Teck strike merger in decade’s top mining deal


Highland Valley Copper Operations in British Columbia. (Image courtesy of Teck Resources.)

Anglo American (LON: AAL) is acquiring Teck Resources (TSX: TECK.A TECK.B, NYSE: TECK), Canada’s largest diversified miner, in a $50-billion all-share deal that would create the world’s fifth-largest copper producer — if regulators in Canada, the United States and China sign off.

Anglo will exchange 1.3301 shares for each Teck share, a structure it called a “zero-premium” merger. The math tells a different story: the exchange ratio represents a 17% premium on Teck’s closing price Monday, though Anglo will offset it with a $4.5-billion special dividend to its investors, leaving the effective premium at just 1%.

If completed, Anglo shareholders will own 62.4% of the new company, to be named Anglo Teck, while Teck shareholders will hold 37.6%. Anglo CEO Duncan Wanblad will lead the combined miner, with Teck CEO Jonathan Price as deputy.

Wanblad said she headquarters will be based in Vancouver, while Anglo’s London office, where its stock is listed, will be “streamlined”. Secondary listings are planned for Toronto and Johannesburg, along with a New York float via American Depository Receipts.

The merger is aimed at securing copper supply amid soaring demand for the metal, essential to electrification and renewable energy. Teck’s Quebrada Blanca mine in Chile, plagued by cost overruns and operational challenges, is central to that strategy. Both Anglo and Teck have shed assets in recent years to focus on critical metals, with Teck selling most of its coal unit to Glencore and Anglo moving to exit coal, platinum and diamonds.

Canada’s Industry Minister Mélanie Joly said the merger will undergo review under the Investment Canada Act to ensure it delivers a “net benefit” to the country. “Any new investments must support our core mission of building one economy in the best interests of Canadians,” she posted on X.

The deal comes after both miners resisted takeover bids: Anglo rebuffed a $49-billion approach from BHP Group last year, while Glencore failed to acquire Teck in 2022. Analysts say consolidation has been building across the industry as companies race to secure copper reserves.

More to come…


Miners Anglo American and Canadian peer Teck Resource plan new copper giant


By AFP
September 9, 2025


Copper demand has exploded in recent years as the world transitions to cleaner energy and artificial intelligence - Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP SCOTT OLSON



Ben PERRY

British mining group Anglo American and Canadian peer Teck Resources on Tuesday announced plans for a multi-billion-dollar merger, creating a champion of copper production and other critical minerals.

A combined group is worth more than US$50 billion according to the companies’ current market values, while the agreed deal is expected to complete in 12-18 months, subject to regulatory hurdles.

It will create Anglo Teck, headquartered in Vancouver and with a primary listing in London, according to a joint statement. It is the sector’s biggest tie-up for some years.

Copper demand has exploded in recent years as the world transitions to cleaner energy and artificial intelligence (AI).

The metal is needed for solar panels, wind turbines, electric-vehicle batteries and consumer electronics.

“This merger of two highly complementary portfolios will create a leading global critical minerals champion headquartered in Canada,” Teck chief executive Jonathan Price said in the statement.

Anglo American shareholders will own 62.4 percent of the new group and Teck shareholders the remainder.

Price added that the new company would be “a top five global copper producer with exceptional mining and processing assets located across Canada, the United States, Latin America, and Southern Africa”.

Copper is used also in military hardware, including aircraft, while there is growing demand linked to the boom in AI and data centres.

Alongside copper assets, the new group will operate premium iron ore, zinc and crop nutrients businesses.

Anglo Teck expects recurring annual pre-tax cost savings of $800 million, beginning four years after the merger completes.

“We are all committed to preserving and building on the proud heritage of both companies, both in Canada, as Anglo Teck’s natural headquarters, and in South Africa where our commitment to investment and national priorities endure,” said Anglo American chief executive Duncan Wanblad.

He will become CEO of Anglo Teck, with Price his deputy.

– Shares soar –

Shares in Anglo American surged more than eight percent in early trading, taking it to the top of London’s benchmark FTSE 100 index. Shares in rival miners jumped on its coattails.

“Anglo American’s merger with Teck is its latest strategic pivot that cements copper at the heart of its portfolio,” noted Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.

“With over 70 percent copper exposure… the combined group is positioned to ride the structural demand story tied to electrification and energy transition.”

Anglo American in 2024 rejected a multi-billion-dollar takeover bid from Australian rival BHP, one year after Swiss commodities giant Glencore failed with an offer for Teck.

More recently, US group Peabody Energy walked away from a a $3.8-billion deal to buy Anglo American’s steelmaking coal business.

In 1917, German-born industrialist Ernest Oppenheimer founded Anglo American in South Africa, 15 years after his arrival in the country.

Study finds critically endangered sharks being sold as food in U.S. grocery stores




University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Shark Meat 

image: 

Pictures of shark meat purchased for the study.

view more 

Credit: Savannah Ryburn






A new study from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has uncovered that shark meat sold in U.S. grocery stores, seafood markets, and online vendors often comes from endangered species and is frequently mislabeled. Researchers purchased and DNA barcoded 29 shark meat products to determine their species identity, finding that 93% of samples were ambiguously labeled and included meat from 11 different shark species. 

Among the species identified were the great hammerhead and scalloped hammerhead, both listed as critically endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Despite global declines in shark populations, their meat was being sold to American consumers, sometimes for as little as $2.99 per pound. 

“Mislabeling and ambiguous labeling remove consumers’ ability to choose what they are putting in their bodies,” said Savannah Ryburn, Ph.D., first author of the study and co-instructor of the seafood forensics class that conducted the research. “For example, two species in our study, scalloped hammerhead and great hammerhead, were ambiguously labeled as ‘shark,’ even though they are strongly advised against consumption due to their very high mercury levels. Without accurate and precise labeling, consumers cannot avoid purchasing these products.” 

The researchers found that of the 29 products tested, 27 were labeled simply as “shark” or “mako shark” without a species designation. Even among the two products that were labeled with a species name, one turned out to be incorrect. These findings highlight a major gap in seafood transparency and consumer safety. 

“The United States should require seafood distributors to provide species-specific names for the products being sold,” said John Bruno, Ph.D., distinguished professor and co-instructor of the seafood forensics class. 

Shark meat is known to contain high levels of mercury, which can pose serious risks to human health, particularly for children and pregnant people. The researchers emphasize that accurate labeling is essential not only for conservation but also for consumer protection. 

“Sharks such as great and scalloped hammerheads are the ocean’s equivalent of lions, and we were shocked by how cheaply the meat of these rare, long-lived apex predators was sold,” added Ryburn. “Some samples were only $2.99 per pound.” 

The study, which contributes to a limited but growing body of research using DNA barcoding to investigate the accuracy of shark product labeling in the U.S., calls for stronger regulations and oversight of seafood labeling practices. 

The study is available online in the journal Frontiers in Marine Science at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1604454/abstract#supplementary-material 

Meat from critically endangered sharks is commonly sold under false labels in the US




31% of products sold as ‘shark’ in the US are from species at risk of extinction




Frontiers





Sharks have been around for more than 450 million years, but these days they are in deep trouble. Since the 1970s, shark populations have gone down by more than 70% due to unsustainable practices such as shark finning, bycatch, and overfishing, habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has estimated that of the approximately 550 species of sharks in existence, 14% are vulnerable, 11% endangered, and 12% critically endangered. As a result, 74 species of shark are considered at risk by the  Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), meaning that international trade in their products is banned or heavily regulated – at least on paper.

But now, a study in Frontiers in Marine Science has shown that despite bans and regulations, meat from shark species at risk of extinction is commonly available for sale in the US. And because these products are typically sold under generic labels, customers may buy them without being aware.

“We found critically endangered sharks, including great hammerhead and scalloped hammerhead, being sold in grocery stores, seafood markets, and online. Of the 29 samples, 93% were ambiguously labeled as ‘shark,’ and one of the two products labeled at the species level was mislabeled,” said corresponding Dr. Savannah J. Ryburn, a researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

The study was carried out by students, teaching assistants, and instructors taking part in a course on seafood forensics at the same university in 2021 and 2022. Its organizers bought 30 shark products – 19 raw steaks and 11 packages of shark jerky – from shops and the internet in Washington DC, North Carolina, Florida, and Georgia. The researchers then used DNA barcoding to determine the species of each product. They compared these with the label under which it had been sold.

Misleading labels

29 (97%) of the 30 samples were successfully identified to the species level. One of the two samples labeled other than ‘shark’ had been mislabeled: sold as blacktip shark (classified as vulnerable by the IUCN), it really contained meat from the endangered shortfin mako. Only one sample had been sold under an unambiguous, correct label, namely blacktip shark.

Shockingly, 31% percent of the bought samples turned out to be from four endangered or critically endangered species: great hammerhead, scalloped hammerhead, tope, and shortfin mako shark. The others were from another seven species, including the vulnerable spinner, lemon, common tresher, and blacktip shark, and the near threatened smooth-hound and Pacific angelshark. Only one was from a least concern species, the Atlantic sharpnose shark. Moreover, these products were sold remarkably cheaply, at between $6.56 and $11.99 per kilogram for fresh shark meat, and on average $207.37 per kilogram for shark jerky.

“The legality of selling shark meat in the United States depends largely on where the shark was harvested and the species involved, due to regulations under CITES and the Endangered Species Act,” said Ryburn. “However, by the time large shark species reach grocery stores and markets, they are often sold as fillets with all distinguishing features removed, making it unlikely that sellers know what species they are offering.”

Not only risky for sharks

The authors pointed out that three of the species found in this study – scalloped hammerhead, great hammerhead, and dusky smooth-hound shark – are known to contain high levels of mercury and methylmercury, which damage the brain and central nervous system, and arsenic, which can lead to cancer. All three metals have likewise been implicated in the impaired cognitive development and the death of developing babies.

So what can consumers do to mitigate the risk of consuming toxins and unwittingly contributing to the extinction of species?

“Sellers in the United States should be required to provide species-specific names, and when shark meat is not a food security necessity, consumers should avoid purchasing products that lack species-level labeling or traceable sourcing,” Ryburn counseled.

GREENWASHING

‘Capture strategies’ are harming efforts to save our planet warns scientists



A new study has investigated how corporate industries influence individuals, organisations or governments to not act in the best interest of the environment and human health



University of Portsmouth






Peer-reviewed, literature review

  • Scientists warn that powerful industries are quietly shaping laws, research and public messaging in ways that delay environmental and health action

  • Study brings together real-world examples - from fossil fuel-funded museums to biased science conferences - to expose how ‘capture strategies’ work

  • The study calls for stronger conflict of interest rules and greater transparency in funding

For over 80 years, researchers have documented how powerful industries can exert influence over the very institutions meant to regulate them - a phenomenon known as ‘corporate capture’.

From oil spills to pharmaceutical scandals, history has shown how these close relationships between corporations and decision-makers can have serious, sometimes devastating, consequences for both human and environmental health.

International scientists warn that unless kept in check, ‘corporate capture’ will play an instrumental role in obstructing efforts to address the triple planetary crises of climate change, biodiversity loss and chemical pollution.

A new study, led by Professor Alex Ford from the University of Portsmouth, highlights how a wide range of industries use strategic influence to shape decisions affecting people and the planet, from environmental laws being watered down, harmful products left on the market, or vital research suppressed to protect profits. 

Published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, the research brings together perspectives and expertise from members of the International Panel on Chemical Pollution (IPCP), of which Professor Ford is the first UK academic to serve on the Board

Using existing evidence from across sectors - such as tobacco, chemicals, fossil fuels, food, pharmaceuticals, and the media - they have created a tactics playbook to help safeguard against negative influence. 

Real-world examples include instances where regulatory agencies have become reliant on industry data, research institutions avoid publishing critical findings to protect funding, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) or museums accept sponsorships that may shape their messaging.

Professor Ford from the University of Portsmouth’s School of the Environment and Life Sciences and Institute of Marine Sciences, has been investigating the impact of the chemicals on marine environments for several years.

“There’s growing evidence that those tasked with protecting people and the planet can become entangled - sometimes unknowingly - in a web of influence, where funding, data and decision-making are carefully steered by vested interests,” said Professor Ford. “These ‘capture strategies’ don’t always look like outright corruption. They can be subtle, systemic, and deeply embedded, making them all the more important to recognise and call out.” 

First studied in the 1940s, ‘corporate capture’ sees regulators, policymakers, and even scientists swayed to prioritise private interests over public good. 

This latest paper proposes that ‘capture strategies’ should be considered more broadly, beyond just regulatory bodies, to include universities, NGOs, cultural institutions and even intergovernmental panels. 

It describes how academic institutions have accepted funding from the fossil fuel industry - giving rise to the term “Frackademia” - and how some museums have faced criticism for partnering with oil companies. 

Other examples include pesticide companies sponsoring scientific conferences, historical financial backing from the tobacco industry in Hollywood films, and social media platforms amplifying climate change denial and anti-science misinformation.

While the paper focuses on problematic cases of corporate influence, the authors acknowledge that not all relationships between industry and institutions are harmful. 

“In fact, the private sector has played an important role in developing innovative technologies and supporting environmental initiatives,” explained co-author Dr Maria Clara Starling. “Industry voices have a place in public debate, but that involvement must be transparent, accountable, and free from conflicts of interest that undermine public and environmental wellbeing.”

IPCP board members are calling for stronger conflict of interest policies, greater transparency in funding, and improved governance within institutions. It also recommends that university students are trained on disinformation and influence tactics, particularly within the environmental sciences.

This is not the first time Professor Ford has explored the dynamic between science, influence and environmental policy. Earlier this year, he co-authored a paper in Nature Water examining how England’s water industry uses communication tactics to shift attention away from sewage pollution

Professor Ford added: “The idea isn’t to vilify industry - many companies are doing important work in sustainability. It’s about increasing awareness of how some industries operate to slow down positive progress.  

“Commercial interests don’t always align with public or planetary health, and we need the tools to understand and navigate that dynamic.”

‘Microbial piracy’ uncovers new way to fight drug-resistant infections





Imperial College London






Researchers have discovered how ‘pirate phages’ hijack other viruses to break into bacteria, sharing new genetic material for dangerous traits.

Imperial scientists have uncovered how bacteriophages are able to hijack other viruses to break into bacterial cells and spread, through an act of microbial piracy which could potentially be harnessed for medicine.

The discovery, published in the journal Cell, reveals a major route by which bacteria are able to acquire new genetic material, including traits that can make them more virulent or more resistant to antibiotics. The researchers believe it could also open the door to new ways of tackling the global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and developing rapid diagnostic tools.

Phages (or bacteriophages) are viruses that infect and kill bacteria. They are among the most abundant organisms on Earth and are often highly specific, each tailored to attack just one bacterial species. Structurally, they resemble microscopic syringes: with a ‘head’ section packed with DNA and a tail section tipped with spiky fibres that latch onto bacteria and inject their genetic payload.

But phages themselves are not safe from parasites. They can be targeted by small genetic elements known as phage satellites that hijack the phage’s own genetic machinery to propagate.

In the latest study, Imperial researchers focused on a powerful family of phage satellites called capsid-forming phage-inducible chromosomal islands (cf-PICIs). These genetic elements can spread genes for antibiotic resistance and virulence, and are found across more than 200 bacterial species. Exactly how they managed to move so efficiently, however, was unclear.

First discovered by the team in 2023, cf-PICIs can build their own capsids (the viral ‘heads’), but they lack tails, meaning on their own they produce non-infective particles – i.e. they are not able to infect phages. In their latest work, researchers at Imperial’s Centre for Bacterial Resistance Biology discovered the missing piece of the puzzle: cf-PICIs hijack tails from unrelated phages, creating hybrid “chimeric” viruses. The result is a chimeric phage carrying cf-PICI DNA inside their own capsids but a phage-derived tail attached.

Crucially, some cf-PICIs can hijack tails from entirely different phage species, effectively broadening their host range. Because the tail decides which bacteria are targeted, this piracy gives cf-PICIs the ability to infiltrate new bacterial species, explaining their great abundance in nature.

According to the researchers, the implications could be important for science. By understanding and harnessing this molecular piracy, researchers believe they could re-engineer satellites to target antibiotic-resistant bacteria, overcome stubborn bacterial defences such as biofilms, and even develop powerful new diagnostic tools.

“These pirate satellites don’t just teach us how bacteria share dangerous traits,” explains Dr Tiago Dias da Costa, from Imperial’s Department of Life Sciences. “They could inspire next-generation therapies and tests to outmanoeuvre some of the most difficult infections we face.”

The Imperial team has successfully filed patents to further develop the work and hopes to begin testing the translational applications of the technology.

Professor Jose Penades, from Imperial’s Department of Infectious Disease, said: “Our early work first identified these odd genetic elements, where we found they are effectively a parasite of a parasite. We now know these mobile genetic elements form capsids which can swap ‘tails’ taken from other phages to get their own DNA into a host cell. It’s an ingenious quirk of evolutionary biology, but it also teaches us more about how genes for antibiotic resistance can be spread through a process called transduction.”

Dr Dias da Costa, added: “This experimental work sheds more light on a crucial method of gene transfer in bacteria. If we can harness and engineer cf-PICIs it could provide us with a valuable new tool in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.”

AI co-scientist tool
In a linked project, coordinated through the Fleming Initiative – a partnership between Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust – researchers used their experimental work to validate a groundbreaking AI platform developed by Google.

Dubbed the ‘co-scientist’, the platform is designed to help scientists develop smarter experiments and accelerate discovery.

To test the platform, the Imperial team posed the same basic scientific questions that had driven their own work: How do cf-PICIs spread across so many bacterial species?

Armed with this starting point, and drawing on web searches, research papers, and databases, the AI independently generated hypotheses that mirrored the team’s own experimentally proven ideas – effectively pointing to the same experiments that had taken years of work to establish, but doing so in a matter of days.

The researchers say this shows the extraordinary potential of AI systems to ‘super-charge science’, not by replacing human insight, but by accelerating it. They are now working with Google to further develop the platform and explore how it could transform the pace of biomedical research.

‘Chimeric infective particles expand species boundaries in phage inducible chromosomal island mobilization’ by He L & Patkowski JB, et al. is published in the journal Cell. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.019

‘AI mirrors experimental science to uncover a novel mechanism of gene transfer crucial to bacterial evolution’ by Penades JP et al. is published in the journal Cell. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.018