Tuesday, September 16, 2025

GREEN CAPITALI$M

Vietnam and Singapore strike deal on carbon markets

Vietnam and Singapore strike deal on carbon markets
/ Unsplash - Tron Le
By bne IntelliNews September 17, 2025

Vietnam and Singapore have signed a landmark agreement paving the way for joint participation in international carbon trading, in a move both governments say will bolster global efforts to curb climate change.

The deal, concluded virtually on September 16 and reported by Viet Nam News, falls under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, which allows countries to cooperate on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through cross-border carbon credit schemes. It was signed by Vietnam’s Acting Minister of Agriculture and Environment, Trần Đức Thắng, and Singapore’s Minister for Sustainability and the Environment, Grace Fu.

Hanoi said the agreement will establish a legal framework for Vietnamese companies to launch projects that cut emissions and generate carbon credits, which can then be transferred to Singapore. Officials argue the scheme could unlock new streams of climate finance, attract foreign investment and speed up the shift towards renewable energy, sustainable agriculture and the circular economy.

Thắng called the arrangement a “breakthrough”, the report went on to say, adding that it would help foster the use of advanced technology while positioning both nations as regional leaders in building a future carbon market.

Singapore’s environment minister meanwhile described the pact as a “significant new frontier” in bilateral ties, expressing confidence that it would stimulate further cooperation on reducing emissions and strengthen ASEAN’s collective response to climate change.

The Vietnamese ministry said guidelines on project approvals and eligible methodologies will be released later. It added that cooperation with Singapore is expected to draw international capital into Vietnam while also delivering wider social and environmental benefits, such as job creation, clean water access and improved energy security.

 

India reveals plans for indigenous solar production by 2028

India reveals plans for indigenous solar production by 2028
/ Zbynek Burival - Unsplash
By bno - Mumbai bureau September 17, 2025

India has set its sights on building a fully indigenous solar value chain, with the goal of achieving domestic solar cell manufacturing by 2028, according to a government of India press release. The plan, announced at the recently held State Review Meeting on Renewable Energy organised by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), marks a significant step towards reducing import dependence and strengthening the country’s renewable energy base.

Union Minister for New and Renewable Energy Pralhad Joshi said India is moving beyond the production of solar modules to building capabilities in wafers and ingots, thereby ensuring that the entire solar manufacturing ecosystem can be established within the country. According to the Minister, the effort is expected to generate employment, attract investment, and reinforce India’s position as a clean energy manufacturing hub.

Joshi also noted the progress made by states in advancing renewable energy initiatives, which has contributed to India’s standing as a global leader in the sector. He highlighted that India has already crossed 251.5 GW of non-fossil capacity, taking the country more than halfway towards its 2030 target of 500 GW.

Key schemes highlighted

The Minister drew attention to flagship initiatives such as the PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana, under which nearly 2mn households have benefitted. He urged states and distribution companies (DISCOMs) to ensure strict quality compliance, finalise agreements promptly, and pass on tariff credits to consumers. He also spoke about the PM-KUSUM scheme, which after a slow start, has gained momentum with demand for fresh allocations from state governments. A second phase of PM-KUSUM is expected to be launched after March 2026.

On free electricity, Joshi said benefits should be distributed in a financially sustainable manner. Nearly half of households under the Surya Ghar scheme now report zero electricity bills, which he described as an example of long-term relief being balanced with fiscal stability.

Renewable energy growth and regulatory clarity

India recently reached the milestone of having 50% of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil fuel sources, five years ahead of target. Joshi, however, cautioned that capacity creation must be matched by effective utilisation. He called on states to expedite Renewable Purchase Obligations (RPOs), power purchase agreements (PPAs), and transparent land allotments. He also advised against delaying procurement in the expectation of lower tariffs, warning that such delays could undermine growth momentum.

The Minister pressed states to improve ease of doing business in the renewable sector by adopting single-window clearance systems, easing compliances, and resolving land access issues. Investor confidence, he said, depends on proactive facilitation. Wind-rich states were urged to prepare time-bound plans for new site allocations and transmission readiness.

Support for domestic manufacturing

On manufacturing, Joshi pointed to the success of the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for high-efficiency solar PV modules. With an outlay of INR240bn, the scheme has already created 100 GW of module manufacturing capacity, mobilised investments worth INR500bn, and generated over 12,600 direct jobs.

He also welcomed the recent cut in GST on renewable energy devices and services from 12% to 5%, covering solar cookers, wind turbines, biogas plants, and hydrogen systems. The move, he said, will make clean energy technologies more affordable and accelerate adoption across the country.

Collective effort required

Joshi stressed that India’s energy transition will only succeed through coordinated action involving the Centre, states, industry, and citizens. He assured full support from the MNRE and encouraged stakeholders to put forward ideas for accelerating growth.

Union Minister of State for New and Renewable Energy Shripad Naik added that both PM-KUSUM and PM Surya Ghar are central to India’s energy security and citizen empowerment. He said PM-KUSUM has installed or solarised over 1.6mn pumps out of the 4.9mn allocated, reducing annual diesel use by 1.3bn litres, cutting 40mn tonnes of CO₂ emissions, and conserving foreign exchange. Surya Ghar is currently adding 4,500 systems daily, supported by a network of more than 18,000 vendors nationwide.

Naik said both schemes represent the “spirit of India’s energy transition”, combining farmer empowerment, job creation, and emissions reduction.

Future outlook

MNRE Secretary Santosh Kumar Sarangi outlined India’s long-term renewable energy targets: 1,800-GW capacity by 2047 and 5,000 GW by 2070. He cited examples of effective state practices, such as Maharashtra’s PM-KUSUM rollout, Gujarat’s renewable clusters, and Karnataka’s land facilitation policies.

The review meeting featured state-wise assessments of Surya Ghar and PM-KUSUM, alongside presentations from industry associations on sectoral challenges. Stakeholder consultations were also held on the design of PM-KUSUM 2.0, with the aim of aligning state initiatives, industry input, and national policy to accelerate renewable energy deployment.

The event brought together senior representatives from renewable-rich states and industry bodies, underlining the government’s focus on achieving energy security, sustainability, and economic growth through a stronger domestic renewable energy ecosystem.

CRONY CAPITALI$M

Nigerian president advances oil bill placing NNPCL under control of Finance Ministry, upstream regulator

Nigerian president advances oil bill placing NNPCL under control of Finance Ministry, upstream regulator
President Bola Tinubu has endorsed a draft Petroleum Industry Act (Amendment) Bill 2025 for preliminary consultations that would transfer NNPCL ownership and empower NUPRC to act as the government’s concessionaire in oil contracts. / bne IntelliNews
By bne IntelliNews September 16, 2025

Report suggest a move is afoot to amend Nigeria's landmark Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) to reassign control of the oil sector from the "independent" state oil company NNPCL to the Ministry of Finance and upstream regulator NUPRC, dramatically shifting the responsibilities and balance of power among agencies and officials. 

President Bola Tinubu has reportedly endorsed a draft Petroleum Industry Act (Amendment) Bill 2025 for preliminary consultations, according to a notification sent by the Attorney General to industry agencies, reported by a handful of media. As of September 16, no official gazette or National Assembly record of a “Petroleum Industry Act (Amendment) Bill 2025” had been made public.

According to Africa Oil & Gas Report, the amendment in question was drafted by the Minister of Finance, with the stated goal of addressing the “escalating fiscal leakage and revenue loss confronting the Federation.”

The bill would transfer ownership of NNPCL to the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI), replacing the current arrangement under the Ministry of Petroleum Incorporated (MOPI), and empower the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) to act as the government’s concessionaire in oil contracts.

Under the proposed changes, NUPRC would represent the state in production-sharing, profit-sharing and service contracts, and verify cost-recovery claims and annual work programmes, The Africa Report noted in an overview of the potential impact.

The bill further seeks to codify joint oversight of integrated upstream-midstream projects by NUPRC and the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), following earlier territorial rows between the two agencies.

NUPRC’s dual function as both regulator and contracting authority could raise questions over potential conflicts of interest, though concentrating responsibility within fewer agencies could cut administrative costs and reduce red tape, the publication writes.

Clementine Wallop of consultancy Horizon Engage told The Africa Report the restructuring drive indicates a move towards stronger state oversight, making it more difficult to present NNPCL as an “independent” commercial enterprise.

The bill would expand the influence of Finance Minister Wale Edun and his ministry, which would direct NNPCL’s corporate strategy and boost the authority of NUPRC leadership in contract negotiations. By contrast, the powers of NNPCL’s board and executive management would be significantly reduced.

ThisDay columnist Samuel Ajayi warned last week that the proposed amendment to the PIA would set the nation’s oil and gas industry back by decades and erase the gains of the last five years, in terms of undermining investor confidence.

“The PIA did not only reduce a lot of legal and operational bottlenecks from the operations of the upstream sector of the nation’s oil and gas industry, it also created an unprecedented confidence in the minds of foreign investors in the sector,” Ajayi wrote.

“However, it seems some individuals and interests within the corridors of power are bent on destroying whatever gains the country has made since the passing of the PIA. Sources close to the corridors of power told [ThisDay] that an amendment to the PIA is being packaged as an Executive Bill.”

 

People on Ozempic who eat to regulate emotions less likely to lose weight


Scientists studying people taking GLP-1 receptor agonists like Ozempic found that those who experienced emotional eating were less likely to lose clinically significant weight



Frontiers






GLP-1 receptor agonists like Ozempic can be a lifeline for people with diabetes — helping stabilize blood glucose and lose weight which contributes to diabetes complications. But not everyone benefits equally. Scientists monitoring 92 individuals with diabetes in Japan over their first year of taking GLP-1 drugs found that people’s reasons for overeating may affect the success of these therapies. Individuals who overeat in response to the sight or smell of tasty food were most likely to respond well to the drugs in the long term, whereas individuals who overeat for emotional reasons were less likely to. 

“Pre-treatment assessment of eating behavior patterns may help predict who will benefit most from GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy,” said Prof Daisuke Yabe of Kyoto University, senior author of the article in Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare. “GLP-1 receptor agonists are effective for individuals who experience weight gain or elevated blood glucose levels due to overeating triggered by external stimuli. However, their effectiveness is less expected in cases where emotional eating is the primary cause.”

How people eat

GLP-1 receptor agonists help lower blood glucose through several mechanisms, including boosting insulin secretion, and cause weight loss by modifying appetite. But not everyone loses weight while taking them. To investigate this problem, the researchers focused on people’s relationship to food, and what that might mean for their treatment.

They enrolled 92 people with type 2 diabetes beginning treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists in Gifu Prefecture, Japan, and tracked their progress during their first year of treatment. At three different points — the beginning of treatment, three months later, and 12 months later — they collected data on participants’ body weight and composition, diet, and a range of relevant blood markers like blood glucose and cholesterol levels. They also asked about their relationship with food. 

The scientists were particularly interested in three different types of eating behaviors associated with weight gain: emotional eating, where people eat in response to negative emotions rather than hunger, external eating, where people eat because the food looks great rather than because of hunger, and restrained eating, where people control their diet to lower their weight. In moderation, restrained eating can help with weight loss, but in excess, it can lead to disordered eating.

Different bodies, different results

In general, individuals saw a statistically significant reduction in body weight, cholesterol levels, and body fat percentage over the course of the year, while skeletal muscle mass stayed the same. Blood glucose levels also improved, but the improvements weren’t statistically significant. 

However, there were some differences in results based on eating behaviors. At the three-month mark, participants reported more behaviors associated with restrained eating, and fewer behaviors associated with external or emotional eating. However, by the 12-month point, restrained and emotional eating behaviors returned to their baseline levels. 

“One possible explanation is that emotional eating is more strongly influenced by psychological factors which may not be directly addressed by GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy,” said Dr Takehiro Kato of Gifu University, second author of the article. “Individuals with prominent emotional eating tendencies may require additional behavioral or psychological support.”

The scientists also didn’t find links between emotional or restrained eating scores at the beginning of treatment and the benefits that participants saw from the drugs by the end of the year. By contrast, the decrease in external eating was sustained over the full year, and people who reported high levels of external eating at the start saw the best results in terms of weight loss and blood glucose levels. 

Although this study has the advantage of following individuals with diabetes under real-life conditions, as an observational study using self-reported measures, it can’t determine causation. The researchers also pointed out that this group of people may have been especially highly motivated to try to improve their control over their diabetes, which might have resulted in greater weight loss. 

“While our study suggests a potential association between external eating behavior and treatment response to GLP-1 receptor agonists, these findings remain preliminary,” said Yabe. “Further evidence is necessary before they can be implemented in clinical practice. Should future large-scale or randomized controlled trials validate this relationship, incorporating simple behavioral assessments could become a valuable component in optimizing treatment strategies.”

 

AACR Cancer Progress Report highlights lifesaving impact of federal investments in cancer research



FDA approved 20 new cancer drugs during the 12 months covered by the report, but challenges such as early-onset cancers remain while turmoil at NIH threatens progress




American Association for Cancer Research





PHILADELPHIA – Today, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) released the 15th edition of its annual Cancer Progress Report. A cornerstone of the AACR’s educational and advocacy efforts, this comprehensive report provides the latest statistics on cancer incidence, mortality, and survivorship and highlights how federal investments in basic, translational, and clinical cancer research and cancer-related population sciences have led to impressive scientific advances that are improving health and saving lives.

The AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025 features a special section that explains how advances in understanding blood cancers over the past decade have contributed to the development of groundbreaking treatments for not only hematologic malignancies, but also solid tumors and diseases other than cancer. Throughout the report, personal stories of patients who have benefited from recent scientific breakthroughs help to illustrate the value and real-world impact of cancer research. The report further explores how the current instability at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has had an adverse effect on cancer patients and their loved ones while also threatening future progress against cancer.

This year’s report closes with a strong, timely call to action that urges policymakers to stand up in support of NIH, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and to provide a robust funding increase for cancer research in Fiscal Year (FY) 2026.

“As this report illustrates, progress against cancer requires a highly collaborative process,” said AACR President Lillian L. Siu, MD, FAACR. “The exchange of knowledge among basic, translational, and clinical researchers, as well as population scientists, is vital to our understanding of the complexity of cancer and of improving outcomes for patients. From bench to bedside and back to the bench, technological innovations are fueling rapid advances to detect cancer earlier and develop more precise treatments that have the potential to both extend life and preserve its quality. If we continue to work together—not just scientists and clinicians, but also patients, advocates, funders, and policymakers—we can ensure that this momentum continues and that every discovery brings us closer to a world where fewer people develop cancer, more people are cured, and all patients live longer, healthier lives.”

CANCER RESEARCH IS IMPROVING, EXTENDING, AND SAVING LIVES

In partnership with NIH and other federal health agencies, the medical research community continues to make inroads against cancer, helping patients to live longer and better lives after diagnosis. According to the AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025:

  • From July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025, FDA approved 20 new anticancer therapeutics, including:
    • the first T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell therapy, approved for the treatment of patients with a type of soft tissue sarcoma;
    • a new therapeutic antibody targeting a novel protein on stomach cancer cells, which is benefiting individuals with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer;
    • the first IDH-targeted therapy for the treatment of brain tumors, which is bringing new hope to young adult patients who have a mutation in this gene; and
    • two new antibody-drug conjugates, both of which were approved to treat lung cancer and one that was also approved to treat breast cancer.
       
  • During this same time frame, FDA also approved:
    • new uses for eight previously approved anticancer therapeutics;
    • a wearable device that uses low-intensity electrical fields to slow the growth of lung cancer cells;
    • two new minimally invasive early detection screening tests, including the first liquid biopsy test and a next-generation multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening;
    • a device for at-home sample collection for cervical cancer screening; and
    • several AI-powered devices and software tools for aiding in cancer risk prediction, diagnosis, and early detection.
       
  • Due to a reduction in smoking rates as well as advances in prevention, early detection, and treatment, the age-adjusted overall cancer death rate in the U.S. fell by 34% between 1991 and 2023, a reduction that translates into averting more than 4.5 million deaths from cancer.
     
  • The five-year relative survival rate for all cancers combined has increased from 49% for those diagnosed between 1975 and 1977 to 70% among those diagnosed between 2015 and 2021.
     
  • As of January 1, 2025, more than 18.6 million adults and children with a history of cancer were living in the U.S., representing 5.5% of the total U.S. population.

REMARKABLE PROGRESS AGAINST BLOOD CANCERS

Research-driven progress against blood cancers, especially over the last 10 years, has significantly decreased blood cancer-related deaths, improved survival rates, and helped survivors live fuller lives. As discussed in a special section of this year’s Cancer Progress Report:

  • Treatments for blood cancers have led to the revolution in precision cancer medicine and blazed new trails in the field of cancer immunotherapy. Over the past decade, FDA approved 29 new molecularly targeted therapies and 21 new immunotherapeutics to treat various types of hematological malignancies.
     
    • One of the first molecularly targeted therapeutics approved by FDA, imatinib (Gleevec), was approved to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in 2001. This treatment transformed a once-fatal disease into a manageable chronic condition. Researchers have continued to build on the success of imatinib, with five additional targeted therapies for CML approved in the years since. Indeed, targeted therapeutics now comprise an indispensable pillar of cancer treatment for blood cancers and solid tumors alike.
       
    • Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a form of cellular immunotherapy that has revolutionized the treatment landscape for blood cancers. The first CAR T-cell therapy was approved by FDA in 2017. Since then, FDA has approved six additional CAR T-cell therapies, all for the treatment of blood cancers, including leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma.
       
  • Largely because of advances in precision cancer medicine, mortality rates for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)—the most common type of blood cancer in the U.S.—declined by 43% between 1991 and 2023.
     
  • During the same time period, multiple myeloma mortality decreased by 31%. The decline in mortality has continued even as incidence in the U.S. has been rising, underscoring advances in treatment and disease management.
     
  • This progress is ongoing. In the 12 months covered by this report, three anticancer therapeutics were approved to treat various types of blood cancer:
    • revumenib (Revuforj), the first menin-targeted therapy, for patients with acute leukemias harboring specific genetic alterations;
    • denileukin diftitox-cxdl (Lymphir), a novel cytotoxic fusion protein, for the treatment of a rare form of NHL called cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; and
    • obecabtagene autoleucel (Aucatzyl), a new CAR T-cell therapy, for patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, expanding options for patients with this aggressive cancer.

A fourth therapeutic, tafasitamab-cxix (Monjuvi), received expanded approval for treatment of follicular lymphoma.

EVEN WITH MAJOR ADVANCES, CANCER REMAINS A THREAT

Despite tremendous progress in cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment in recent years, cancer continues to afflict millions of Americans. According to the AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025:

  • It is estimated that, in 2025, more than 2 million new cancer cases will be diagnosed, and more than 618,000 people will die from cancer in the U.S.
     
  • While overall cancer incidence in the U.S. has stabilized in recent years, the incidence of certain cancers, including pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, uterine cancer, HPV-associated oral cancers, and lung cancer in people who have never smoked, has been rising.
     
  • Cancer in adults under the age of 50, known as early-onset cancer, is also increasing. Between 2010 and 2019, the incidence of 14 cancer types increased in individuals 49 years and younger. Colorectal cancer is a notable example:
    • In the U.S. between 2018 and 2022, colorectal cancer incidence increased by an average of 5% per year for patients younger than 50. For those over 65, however, incidence decreased an average of 2% per year.
    • Between 2019 and 2023, colorectal cancer mortality increased by an average of 1.1% per year for patients younger than 50. For those over 65, however, mortality decreased an average of 2.3% per year.
       
  • Understanding the reasons behind rising cases of early-onset cancers is an area of intensive research. Potential emerging contributors include obesity, the accumulation of microplastics in the bodies of younger individuals, repeated and long-term use of antibiotics, exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS, or “forever chemicals”), and certain strains of the bacterium E. coli.
     
  • Certain groups in the U.S. shoulder a disproportionate burden of cancer. Cancer disparities, defined as adverse differences in cancer-related measures such as number of new cases and deaths or stage at diagnosis, affect multiple segments of the U.S. population and are a significant public health concern that will require tailored efforts to fully understand and address.

CONGRESS MUST PROTECT MEDICAL RESEARCH FOR THE HEALTH OF THE NATION

As outlined in this report, the work of dedicated researchers from across the spectrum of cancer research over the past several decades has dramatically improved outcomes for many patients. Much of this progress has been powered by support from NIH, the “crown jewel” of American science. For example:

  • From 1975 to 2020, prevention and screening efforts supported by federal funding have averted 4.75 million deaths across five major cancer types, including breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers.
     
  • Over the past 40 years, patients with cancer in the U.S. have gained 14 million years of additional life, thanks to federally funded clinical trials.
     
  • NIH-funded research contributed to 354 of the 356 drugs approved by FDA between 2010 and 2019.

This investment not only drives medical breakthroughs but also fuels the American economy. In 2024:

  • Every $1 in NIH funding returned $2.56 in economic activity.
     
  • Overall, NIH funding supported 407,782 new jobs and generated $94.58 billion in economic activity.

Robust, dependable federal support for research has positioned the U.S. at the forefront of scientific innovation. Between 1990 and 2022, the U.S. was the first to launch nearly half of all new cancer drugs, leading the world in the approval and introduction of novel anticancer therapies. Indeed, the promise of scientific discovery in pursuit of even more effective cancer treatments has never been greater. At this pivotal moment, however, turmoil at NIH and other federal health agencies threatens ongoing and future progress for patients.

In the short term, research studies have been postponed, labs across the country have had to lay off or limit hiring staff, and patients’ access to potentially lifesaving treatments has been delayed.

In the longer term, continued disruptions at NIH and uncertainty about sustained federal funding for cancer research will lead to a demoralized and potentially smaller cancer research workforce in this country, as talented scientists may choose to pursue careers outside of academic research or opportunities outside the U.S. As the cancer research workforce shrinks, promising discoveries will be abandoned, and progress against cancer will slow. America’s leadership in science and innovation will be eroded, weakening the nation’s economy and competitiveness. Most devastating, patients with cancer will be left with fewer options, and more lives will be lost.

Encouragingly, leaders in both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have demonstrated strong bipartisan support for medical research and the NIH in their FY 2026 bills. In the Senate, Susan Collins (R-ME), Patty Murray (D-WA), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) are championing robust NIH funding. Their efforts have been matched in the House by Tom Cole (R-OK), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), and Robert Aderholt (R-AL). In addition, Senator Katie Britt (R-AL), Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), and Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) underscored the importance of medical research in this year’s report.  

The AACR applauds these members and many others in Congress for their commitment to ensuring that lifesaving discoveries continue. Their bipartisan leadership is especially critical as final funding decisions remain unresolved and the risk of a government shutdown grows. The AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025 calls on Congress to also:

  • Provide the strongest possible investment in medical research, including $51.303 billion for NIH and $7.934 billion for NCI in FY 2026. This level of support is essential to sustain the scientific workforce, power new breakthroughs against cancer and other diseases, and uphold a national commitment to the patients and families who are relying on lifesaving progress.
     
  • Release delayed, frozen, and unobligated research funds to ensure that promising science is not lost at a critical stage and that patients have access to lifesaving studies.
     
  • Protect public health programs that prevent cancer to avoid losing ground on screening, HPV vaccination, tobacco cessation, and early interventions. These efforts save lives. 
     
  • Support early-career and early-stage scientists and stabilize research careers to stem the loss of postdoctoral researchers and junior investigators who are leaving science or being recruited to research positions abroad. Each departure from U.S. research positions weakens the nation’s capacity for discovery and delays the breakthroughs that patients urgently need.
     
  • Defend the integrity of science by supporting the NIH peer review system, which is the gold standard for ensuring that taxpayer dollars fund the most rigorous, meritorious science.  

“We are deeply grateful to leaders in Congress who have taken action in support of medical research during this tumultuous time,” said AACR Chief Executive Officer Margaret Foti, PhD, MD (hc). “Federal investments in cancer research reduce suffering, restore hope, and save lives. To maintain the tremendous momentum against cancer described in the AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025, robust funding for NIH and other federal health agencies must continue.”

# # #

RESOURCES

For a copy of the report, contact Kathleen Medora at kathleen.medora@aacr.org or 215-290-5408.

To register to attend the September 17 release event unveiling the report in person, please fill out this form. To register to view the event livestream, please fill out this form

The AACR has made the following graphics available for reporters’ use in stories and on social media. Download them at the links below:  

  • Cover of the AACR Cancer Progress Report 2025 (JPG)
  • Increase in Cancer Survivors in the U.S. (JPG)
  • Reduction in Overall Cancer Death Rate (JPG)
  • Cancer Cases and Deaths by 2050 (JPG)
  • What is Causing the Rise in Early-onset Cancers? (JPG)
  • Early-onset Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality (JPG)
  • Progress in Immunotherapy from 2011 to 2025 (JPG)
  • FDA-approved Treatments for Blood Cancer from 2015-2025 (JPG)
  • Mortality Reduction in the U.S. for Selected Blood Cancers (JPG)
  • Progress Against Cancer in Children and Adolescents (JPG)

Video interviews with patients featured in the report, as well as b-roll, are also available. Contact Kathleen Medora at kathleen.medora@aacr.org for clips.