Sunday, November 23, 2025

 

Chinese Yard Delivers DP-Capable Floating Fish Farm Ship

Zhangjiang Bay 1 at launch (Bestway)
Zhangjiang Bay 1 at launch (Bestway)

Published Nov 20, 2025 11:25 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

China's Jiangsu Dajin Heavy Industry Co. has delivered a unique world's first: a DP-capable, ship-shaped, cage-type aquaculture vessel for oceangoing service. The unusual ship design will be deployed off the coast of Naozhou Island, Zhanjiang, where it will be initially used to raise yellow croaker.

The new Zhanjiang Bay 1 is a "mobile marine ranch," according to Chinese state media. It is designed to raise multiple species within one fish farm, and has 12 separate production bays. Targeted production is estimated at 2,000-5,000 tonnes of fish, with "low" levels of energy consumption during operations.  

The objective of making a ship-shaped, station-keeping fish farm is to expand aquaculture into deeper offshore waters, according to the operator. With all-electric propulsion and a DP system, plus onboard provisions for fish feed distribution, the vessel will be able to work further off the coast - and will be able to move to more sheltered waters when a storm system comes through. The ship is part of a push to develop a multi-billion-dollar "blue pastures" industry, a new way to add to China's domestic fish production without re-depleting domestic fisheries

The Zhanjiang Bay 1 will be deployed far from disputed waters, but China's giant fish farms have caused tension elsewhere. In the Yellow Sea, two Chinese net cage structures have been installed in the South Korea-China Provisional Measures Zone (PMZ) - an area of indeterminate boundaries between the two countries. Earlier this year, South Korea’s National Assembly declared the net cage structures "a threat to maritime safety" and requested their removal, following an independent assessment that the structures could have dual-use applications for military surveillance.

The shipbuilder that delivered Zhangjiang Bay 1, Jiangsu Dajin - a division of Bestway Marine - is a comparatively new yard on the Yangtze with a specialty in construction vessels. It has delivered heavy lift crane vessels, deep-sea submersible support vessels, and pile-driving barges. At higher volume, it also produces handysize bulkers and 5,000 dwt multipurpose vessels used in coastwise trade. 

China Brightens U.S. Darkness… Nevertheless!



 November 21, 2025

Image by Getty and Unsplash+.

China is leading the green energy transition for the world as the United States tries to force countries to buy US oil and gas. Last year China installed more renewable energy than the rest of the world combined. Meanwhile, the US committed $625 million in taxpayer funds to save and revive the coal industry. Yes, US taxpayers are subsidizing coal production. It should be noted that “clean coal” is so misleading that it reeks of malodorous sulfur.

China is upstaging the United States across the world by tackling climate change head on. According to a brilliant article in YaleEnvironment360 by Isabel Hilton, As U.S. and E.U. Retreat on Climate, China Takes the Leadership Role, November 10, 2025, “China today produces about 80 percent of all solar panels and more than 70 percent of all electric vehicles.” China has reduced the cost barrier for “the rest of the world” by bringing down costs of solar panels by 90% and reducing the overall expenses for renewables by 70%. Furthermore, as the world’s biggest clean energy juggernaut, it builds clean energy factories abroad investing in 54 countries over the past three years alone. This is tackling climate with gusto while the US reverts to the dark ages of grinding away drill bits and steam shovels blackening the atmosphere.

“If history is any guide, the country that dominates energy usually dominates economics and politics, which is why it is not just old war allies that are cozying up to Beijing. Narendra Modi, the president of longtime rival India, visited China for the biggest ever meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization along with dozens of other regional leaders.” (There is Only One Player: Why China is Becoming a World Leader in Green Energy, The Guardian, September 7,2025).

China’s renewable effort is well ahead of expectations. The country has installed capacity of 1,200GW six years ahead of schedule, which is enough to power approximately 1.2 million homes.

Yet, China is still heavily addicted to coal: “Scientists and campaigners say the climate will not be stabilized solely by selling more photovoltaic cells or windmill blades; it is also necessary to phase out fossil fuels. On this half of the balance sheet, China’s record remains ‘highly insufficient’ and its current policies would, if continued, push the planet towards 4C of heating, according to Climate Action Tracker, an independent initiative assessing countries’ compliance with the Paris agreement. It points out that China is off course from the commitments it previously made to ‘strictly limit’ coal use and to reduce energy and carbon intensity by 2025,” Ibid.

The pushback has been most evident in China’s coal sector, where there has been a surge of investment in the past two years to the highest level in a decade. Major domestic coal companies, such as CHN Energy, Jinneng and Shaanxi Coal and Chemical, have considerable political influence. Thus, China, similar to the US, is beholden to rightward leaning politics that override green technology policies, making it nearly impossible to meet nation/state emissions targets set at Paris 2015 to hold global warming to under 2C. This ridiculously dangerous course has, in fact, become a bad joke, not a laughing matter, as the world’s whipsaw climate system thrashes civilization at every turn. The 2020-decade ia the most expressive decade of a worldwide maniac climate system of all time with ocean heat content dangerously hitting all-time records. A major study claims an ocean regime change. This is a serious threat to the entire planetary climate system equivalent to an emergency.

Coal Kills Climate and People

“Despite claims of ‘clean coal’ made by the industry and administration officials, coal is the dirtiest and most polluting fuel on the planet. Every terawatt-hour of electricity from coal emits about 950,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide, the primary driver of climate change. Even fracked gas emits only about 57 percent as much CO2. Both the mining and burning of coal also create huge quantities of other pollutants: sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulates, heavy metals, and fly ash. A 2023 study in the journal Science found that coal particulates are more than twice as deadly as the same-size particulates from other sources and traced over 450,000 deaths to coal pollution since 1999.”(The Real Reason the Feds Want to Revive Coal, Sierra, October 15, 2025)

AI Greets Coal

The real push for coal is coming from another industry with close ties to the Trump administration. Technology companies investing heavily in AI are fostering a boom in data centers nationwide. Data centers took up about 2 percent of the nation’s electrical power pre-2020. By 2023, that share more than doubled to 176 terawatt-hours of power, more than the total power for the State of Illinois. By 2028, data centers are projected to use up to 12 percent of the entire US electrical grid. This spike in power requirements is impacting electrical bills for consumers, and along with Trump policies slowing down or shutting down new renewable power projects, it will require a ramp up in coal and gas. Trump is preying upon this sudden surge in power requirements to endorse coal. The EPA has proposed delays and gutting regulations for wastewater from coal-fired power plants and pledged to gut the Clean Air Act’s Regional Haze Rule as the DOI intends to open 13.1 million acres of federal land for coal mine leasing.

In the biggest step backwards in modern US history, the Trump administration is spoiling both the atmosphere and the nation’s waterways “Expanding mining and spending taxpayer money on burning coal, while rolling back vital health protections, will only exacerbate the deadly pollution and rising electricity bills that communities are facing across the country,” (Earthjustice Responds to Trump Administration Coal Industry Giveaways, Earthjustice, Sept. 26, 2025).

Red States suffer much more from these policies than any other states. They are double-clobbered (1) by loss of Biden Inflation Reduction Aet jobs, e.g. wind and solar, that Trump cancels, decimating climate mitigation policies, axing climate science, firing leading scientists (the “brain drain”) and (2) suffer the biggest impact of deadly pollution as their blackened coal operations revive. They elected Trump and got what he promised to do, destroy renewables and pollute the atmosphere. “Clean coal” is the biggest con in the history of the planet.

Headlines: “Republicans Sell Out Constituents, Vote to Cut Jobs and Raise Energy Costs Nationwide,” Climate Power, May 27, 2025. “About 80 percent of manufacturing investments spurred by a Biden-era climate law have flowed to Republican districts.” (The New York Times, Feb. 11, 2025) Anything with Biden’s name attached is destroyed.

Project 2025 hit the green economy like a tsunami of mass destruction but Red States take the biggest hits; beware of Midterms vomiting up a lame duck presidency.

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.

Why Do Fascists the World Over Hate Cultivated Meat?



 November 21, 2025

It’s becoming increasingly clear that fascists, seemingly the world over, really hate cultivated meat. For those who don’t know, cultivated meat is grown from livestock cells, without slaughter. It offers a number of benefits to animal welfare, the environment and public health. While the technology currently exists to create the product, it’s too expensive to mass produce. This can be rectified with increased public funding for cellular-agriculture research.

I suppose it shouldn’t be a surprise that far-right authoritarians oppose cultivated meat, given they generally seek a return to a mythologized past. Still, I must confess to being a little startled by the speed with which opposition to cellular agriculture has become part of a shared political agenda of the international fascist movement, alongside the demonization of immigrants and transgender people. After all, cultivated meat is not even on supermarket shelves yet.

Most recently, on November 18, Hungary’s parliament voted to ban the production, distribution and marketing of cultivated meat. István Nagy, agricultural minister of the fascist Fidesz party, said, “the spread of meat produced in laboratory conditions would result in a lifestyle change that would completely upset European culture, which we cannot allow.” According to the online publication Green Queen, the European Commission, as well as European Union member states, are opposed to such bans.

Back in 2023, Italy banned the production and sale of cultivated meat. Francesco Lollobrigida, agricultural minister of the fascist Brothers of Italy party, bragged on social media at the time, “We are the first nation to ban it, with all due respect to the multinationals who hope to make monstrous profits by putting citizens’ jobs and health at risk.” Needless to say, no credible experts believe there are health risks associated with consuming cultivated meat.

Meanwhile, a number of American states controlled by the increasingly fascist Republican party have banned cultivated meat. Sid Miller, the Republican agricultural commissioner of Texas, explained the state’s ban this way: “Texans have a God-given right to know what’s on their plate, and for millions of Texans, it better come from a pasture, not a lab. It’s plain cowboy logic that we must safeguard our real, authentic meat industry from synthetic alternatives.”

In my view, nothing has the potential of reducing more animal suffering and premature death than the widespread introduction of cheap, tasty cultivated meat. While the technology is still being developed, scientists expect the new protein will require a fraction of the greenhouse-gas emissions to produce that slaughtered meat does. Finally, since livestock are removed from the production process, our zoonotic pandemic risk would be dramatically limited.

At the barest minimum, political opponents of fascism should stand against bans on cellular agriculture. More proactively, however, they should support enormous infusions of public funding into cultivated-meat research, so the aforementioned technological hurdles preventing mass production can be overcome. As dark as things feel right now, creating a better world remains possible. Cellular agriculture will do so much for animal welfare, the environment and public health.

Jon Hochschartner is the author of a number of books about animal-rights history, including The Animals’ Freedom FighterIngrid Newkirk, and Puppy Killer, Leave Town. He blogs at SlaughterFreeAmerica.Substack.com.



Quiet, Piggy: Reporters Aren’t Trump’s Subordinates

 November 21, 2025

Photograph Source: The White House – Public Domain

At an Oval Office event on November 18, US president Donald Trump let loose on an ABC News reporter, Mary Bruce, for daring to question Saudi terror kingpin Mohammed bin Salman about the 2018 murder — by Saudi agents, likely on MBS’s direct order — of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

Such questioning, Trump said, was “insubordinate,” musing that Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr “should look at” taking away ABC’s broadcast license.

What does it mean to be “insubordinate?”

Put simply, insubordination entails a person who’s lower on some ladder of authority defying the orders of someone who’s higher on that ladder.

Trump clearly believes in the existence of such a ladder, upon which he enjoys higher ranking than, and authority over, mere mortals. Especially journalists. And most especially female journalists.

He doesn’t bother trying to hide that belief. Earlier in the week, while fielding questions about his long, close, personal relationship with late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, a flustered Trump tried to shush Bloomberg’s White House correspondent, Catherine Lucey: “Quiet. Quiet, piggy.”

In reality, Trump’s only subordinates (with respect to his position as president of the United States) are employees of the federal government’s executive branch. Literally everyone else in the country is either his equal or his superior.

The president is subordinate to Congress.  Congress makes the laws, and can override his vetoes if he doesn’t like the laws they make. He has to ask the Senate for permission to appoint high-level executive branch officials or to enter into treaties. He only gets to spend money Congress appropriates, and only on the purposes it appropriates that money for.

The president is also subordinate to the courts, especially the US Supreme Court. In any legal controversy involving the executive branch, he has to defend his policies before those courts, or go to them, hat in hand, requesting that they enforce those policies. They decide; he obeys.

That’s what the US Constitution says, and what it means, even if we see far more breach than observance in practice.

With respect to the press, he’s neither superior nor subordinate. They don’t work for him, he doesn’t work for them, and the First Amendment forbids Congress (and therefore its subordinate, the president) to make/enforce laws “abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”

As for the public, presidents supposedly work for us, and constantly claim to.

The title “chief executive” doesn’t mean “chief of everything.” It means “chief” of executing the orders his superiors give him, and of the people he further delegates that execution to.

Trump’s not Mary Bruce’s boss. He’s not Catherine Lucey’s boss. He’s neither your boss nor mine. He’s a mere functionary who should learn his place — his SUBORDINATE place.

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.