Monday, October 06, 2025

INTERVIEW

Jane Goodall: 'Every one of us makes a difference – it's up to us what kind'

Jane Goodall, who died on Wednesday aged 91 in California, transformed how the world sees animals – and helped redefine humanity’s place in nature. RFI's Alison Hird spoke with Goodall in 2018, when a documentary about her early years in the forest was drawing new attention to her research.


Issued on: 04/10/2025 - RFI

British anthropologist and primatologist Jane Goodall looks on during the unveiling of her wax statue at the Musée Grevin in Paris, on 1 December, 2023. 
© AFP - MIGUEL MEDINA

Beginning in 1960, Goodall lived for long periods in what is now Gombe Stream National Park in Tanzania, watching wild chimpanzees at close range. She described how they used tools and hunted and their social behaviour, drawing into question the line people drew between humans and other animals.

Goodall went on to become a leading voice for conservation. She founded the Jane Goodall Institute in 1977 to support science and protect great apes and their habitats, then launched Roots & Shoots, a youth programme now active in some 100 countries.


This interview with RFI was recorded around the release of Jane, a documentary directed by Brett Morgen. It shows the young researcher in the forest and reflects on a life built from a childhood dream.


RFI: There have been many documentaries about you. What do you think this one adds to what we know about your work with chimpanzees?

Jane Goodall: It’s completely different to any other documentary in that it’s much more honest. So it basically shows things as they were. I think that Brett Morgen, the director, the way that he’s interspersed interviews with me today with that early footage is amazing. And one of the things that strikes people again and again is there’s a whole long section of Jane on her own in the forest.

And most people don’t even think, well, obviously she wasn’t on her own, she’s being filmed. And yet there’s such an immediacy about it. And even I when I’m watching it, I think yes, that’s how it was. I was alone like that. That’s exactly how it was.


RFI: This was in 1960, in Gombe National Park in Tanzania, very close to the border with Burundi. Probably quite a dangerous place to be, so close to chimpanzees. You were a 26-year-old white female. Were you aware of the dangers?

JG: I don’t think it was dangerous at all. First of all, people have said, well, being a woman must have been a disadvantage. Well actually, no, because Tanzania was becoming independent. White males were considered a sort of threat. But a young girl – innocent, defenceless – they wanted to help.

So I had a lot of help from the local people and from the government as well, once it became independent. And the dangers in the field... not really, you know.

I could have been charged by buffalo. I was, in fact, once. Chimpanzees – they’re not dangerous out in the field. They could be, but they’re not. So I didn’t consider it dangerous. And looking back on it, I don’t think it was dangerous. It became more dangerous once the Congo erupted and we got the people escaping, all the Belgians coming over the lake.

Then things became different. Then you got the genocide in Burundi and Rwanda. It became politically much less stable.


Jane Goodall with a chimpanzee in Tanzania, in the early 1960s. National Geographic


RFI: Just remind us, what made you want to go to Africa in the first place?

JG: When I was eight years old I was reading Doctor Dolittle, and there’s a story where he rescues circus animals and takes them back to Africa. I loved that particular book. And then when I was 10, I read Tarzan and Tarzan of the Apes, and that was it.

So from 10 onwards, that’s all I wanted to do. Go to Africa, live with animals and write books about them.

RFI: In the film we see you saying it was like a dream come true, I felt that this is where I belonged. So really, you felt that was your natural habitat?

JG: Yes. Once I got used to it, it was like my backyard. I knew all the little shortcuts through the forest. I got to know the different animals and the sounds. It was just what I dreamed of all my life.

RFI: Do you prefer animals to humans?

JG: I prefer some animals to some humans, and some humans to some animals. We’re animals too, remember.



RFI: You’ve moved from being a primatologist to more of an animal activist. You founded an educational NGO, Roots & Shoots. It’s now present in around 100 countries.

JG: Roots & Shoots began in Tanzania in 1991 with high school students. The great thing was that these students weren’t animal rights people – they were worried about poaching in the national parks and asked why the government wasn’t doing anything about it.

They were also concerned about the treatment of animals in markets, about street children sniffing glue and about illegal dynamite fishing.

I sent them back to their schools to gather friends who cared about these problems. From the start, Roots & Shoots was different from other environmental organisations. Its message was that every one of us makes a difference every day – and we choose what sort of difference we make.

We knew from the rainforest that everything is interconnected and each species has a role. So groups often focused on three areas: improving life for people, for animals and for the environment. Sometimes one group worked on all three, sometimes they divided tasks but shared results.

The programme grew naturally. It broke down barriers between people of different nations, religions and cultures – and between us and the natural world. People sometimes say they don’t understand the name, but if you picture a seed sending out little white roots and a green shoot that can grow into a mighty tree, you understand why it’s called Roots & Shoots.
Jane Goodall at La Selva Biological Station in Sarapiqui, Costa Rica, September 2007. 
AFP - MAYELA LOPEZ

RFI: Can you give us an example of something that a Roots & Shoots project has achieved?

JG: In Tanzania, we’ve got Roots & Shoots in every single part of the country because it began there, and they’re proud of it. They’ve planted between them so many hundreds of thousands of trees. They’ve really worked to improve the lives of animals. They’ve taught their parents about what’s going on with the dynamite fishing. They’ve made a huge difference in clearing trash, beach clean-ups and so forth.

In China, it’s changed the attitude of a whole generation towards animals and the environment – and the number of Chinese adults who’ve come up to me and said, well, of course I care about the environment, I was in your Roots & Shoots programme in primary school, and they showed us the documentaries about the chimpanzees.

So I’ve seen the attitude in China change, and it’s only recently I’ve realised the major role that Roots & Shoots has played in creating this change.

RFI: You travel around 300 days a year. You’re still a very active woman, even in your eighties. And you travel with this little creature called Ratty. He’s a toy, I must add, a stuffed rat. Just tell me, why Ratty?

JG: Ratty was actually given to me. He’s the symbol for a wonderful group called Doctors Against Animal Experimentation, showing that we don’t need to use animals – the rat being the most commonly used.

But I use Ratty not only to talk about the amazing intelligence of the ordinary rat, but the giant forest rat of Africa has been taught to detect landmines from the scent, even if they’re deep buried under the ground.

And they’ve helped to defuse tens of thousands of landmines in Mozambique, Angola and different African countries, and now moving into the eastern world as well.

They can identify the very earliest stages of TB before the hospital instruments, but now some of them have been taught to sniff out ivory, some rhino horn, some leopard skin, some pangolin scales so they can go up among the crates where people and dogs can’t go. And they have managed to find a whole lot of illegally smuggled products of this sort.

RFI: Just another reminder of how intelligent animals can be. Thank you for talking to us, Jane Goodall.
Eswatini takes in 10 foreign nationals deported from United States

Ten third country nationals deported from the United States have been jailed in Eswatini, the government revealed on Monday. It is just one of several countries to have accepted a deal with the Trump administration in recent months.


Issued on: 06/10/2025 - RFI

A plane carrying migrants deported by the United States under the Trump administration's immigration crackdown,18 July, 2025. AP - Ariana Cubillos

Goverment oficials refused to divulge details of the people who arrived but said they had been securely accommodated in one of the country's correctional facilities.

"The government will facilitate their orderly repatriation," the statement added.

In July, Eswatini became the second African country after South Sudan to admit third country nationals from the US.

Men from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Yemen and Cuba were flown to the southern African country on a range of charges including rape and murder.

They were sent to Eswatini's maximum security Matsapha Correctional Centre.

In August, Uganda's foreign ministry said it would take deported migrants as long as they had no criminal records and were not unaccompanied minors.

Rwanda also confirmed a deal with Washington in August.

Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama said early last month that his country had started receiving West Africans expelled from the US.

Part of the system


Lawyers and civil society groups in Eswatini have gone to court to challenge the legality of the detentions and demand the government make public the terms of its deal with the US.

The non-governmental organisation Human Rights Watch said last month that, according to its information, the deal between the US and Eswatini involved financial assistance of around €5 million (€4.2 million) to build its border and migration management capacity.

In return, Eswatini agreed to accept up to 160 deportees, HRW said in a statement.

The group urged African governments to refuse to accept US deportees and to terminate deals already in effect, saying they violated global rights law.

Deportation plan


US President Donald Trump has overseen an expansion of the practice of deporting people to countries other than their nation of origin, notably by sending hundreds to a notorious prison in El Salvador.

Human rights activists have warned the deportations risk breaking international law by sending people to nations where they face the risk of torture and abduction.

At a rally in Arizona before the US presidential elections in November, Trump attacked the immigration record of his predecessor Joe Biden.

"We’re a dumping ground," Trump told Republican supporters. "We’re like a garbage can for the world. That’s what’s happened.

"Every time I come up and talk about what they’ve [Biden] done to our country I get angry and angrier. First time I’ve ever said garbage can. But you know what? It’s a very accurate description."

In February, hundreds of people were deported from the US to Panama, including some removed before their asylum claims could be heard.

Hundreds more were sent to El Salvador after the US government invoked an 18th century law to expel people it accused of being Venezuelan gang members. Some were deported despite judges in the US ordering planes to turn back.



ZIONISTS ARE GEOGRAPHICALLY CHALLENGED
French nationals on Gaza aid flotilla deported from Israel, sent to Greece

A group of 28 French nationals who were aboard an aid flotilla to Gaza that was intercepted by Israeli forces have been deported and are expected to arrive in Greece on Monday. They are among nearly 200 activists detained by Israel.


Issued on: 06/10/2025 - RFI

Around 45 vessels set out with humanitarian aid for Gaza but were intercepted by Israeli forces. AFP - ELEFTHERIOS ELIS

"Our teams were able to meet all our compatriots, who are doing well,” the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Pascal Confavreux said on social media.

"They continue individual monitoring and remain in close contact with their families to report on the situation and messages conveyed by their loved ones," he added.

On Sunday, the far-left French political party La France Insoumise (LFI) said four of its elected officials who were part of the flotilla had started a hunger srike.

"We know that their detention conditions are difficult, with more than 10 people per cell," LFI MEP Manon Aubry told French broadcaster franceinfo.

Israel said it deported on Monday 171 more activists of various nationalities, who were detained while taking part in the aid flotilla bound for Gaza, including Swedish campaigner Greta Thunberg.

Most, if not all, will be flown to Greece, where they will be able to get flights to their home countries, their respective governments said on Sunday.

Voyage to Gaza


The Global Sumud Flotilla of around 45 vessels began its voyage to Gaza in September, with politicians and activists including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg aiming to break Israel's siege of the Palestinian territory, where the United Nations says famine has set in.

The Israeli navy began intercepting vessels after warning the activists against entering waters it says fall under its blockade, with Thunberg's ship among those stopped from going further.

Last week, more than 30 had been intercepted or were assumed to have been intercepted, according to the flotilla's tracking system.

Flotilla spokesman Saif Abukeshek said the vessels that had not been intercepted were determined to continue.

In a statement, the flotilla organisers branded the interceptions as "illegal" since they were traversing international waters.

'Piracy'


Hamas, whose 7 October, 2023 attack on Israel sparked the war in Gaza, condemned the interception of the flotilla as a "crime of piracy and maritime terrorism".

With the war in Gaza dragging on, solidarity with the Palestinians has grown globally, with activists and increasingly governments criticising Israel for its actions.

Spain and Italy, which both sent naval escorts to protect its citizens on board the flotilla, had urged the activists to halt before entering Israel's declared exclusion zone off Gaza, saying they would not be allowed to pass that mark.

After a 10-day stop in Tunisia, where organisers reported two drone attacks, the flotilla resumed its journey on 15 September.

In Italy, which has already seen a general strike in support of the flotilla, hundreds of protesters turned out last Wednesday in Rome.

In Naples, demonstrators blocked trains at the main station for around an hour before being cleared by police.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro said he will expel all remaining Israeli diplomats in the country over the interception.

Turkey called the interception "an act of terrorism that constitutes the most serious violation of international law and endangers the lives of innocent civilians".

(with newswires)
‘A form of crisis profiteering’ – report slams rich nations over climate loans

Rich countries are pushing poorer nations further into debt by giving most climate aid as loans instead of grants, a report published on Monday warned. The money often ends up back in the pockets of donor countries while vulnerable nations struggle to respond to climate disasters.



Issued on: 06/10/2025 - RFI


Rich countries, the main contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, have pledged to help poorer nations hit hardest by the crisis. But Oxfam says that most of this “aid” – about 65 percent – comes as loans with interest. 
© Wanan Yossingkum / Getty Images

By:Amanda Morrow with RFI
Advertising


The report, by the NGOs Oxfam and CARE, comes a month before the Cop30 UN climate summit in Brazil, where governments will debate how to raise 1.3 trillion dollars a year in climate finance by 2035.

France was singled out as one of the worst offenders.

It gave 7.2 billion dollars in climate funding in 2023, but 92 percent of it was in the form of loans rather than grants. The share of loans with ordinary market-level interest rates rose from 5 percent in 2021 to 15 percent a year later.

"That is not even better than what you would get from a commercial bank," Selma Huart, a climate inequality specialist at Oxfam, told RFI. "We are not afraid to say that rich countries, especially France, are making money off the backs of vulnerable countries in the name of the climate crisis.


Overall, the report found that wealthy countries – historically the biggest polluters – are delivering about 65 percent of their climate funding as loans.

"Climate finance is supposed to help poorer countries face floods, droughts and other climate disasters," said Huart. "But for every 5 dollars they receive, they pay back 7."

Rich nations promised back in 2009 to provide 100 billion dollars a year in climate funding by 2020. They only claimed to have met that goal in 2022, reporting 116 billion dollars. But the report said that after repayments and interest, developing countries received only about a quarter of that – far below what experts say they will need in the years ahead.


Repayment trap

The loan-heavy approach is deepening debt in many low-income countries, which already spend more on interest than on health or education.

"These countries are already heavily indebted, so giving them more loans cuts their room to invest in public services, adapt to climate disasters or pursue their energy transition," Huart added.

Countries that have contributed least to global warming, the authors note, are being forced to pay the most to cope with its effects.

"Rich countries are treating the climate crisis as a business opportunity, not a moral obligation," warned Nafkote Dabi, Oxfam’s climate policy lead. "They are lending money to the very people they have historically harmed, trapping vulnerable nations in a cycle of debt. This is a form of crisis profiteering."


Monsoon clouds build over New Delhi, India, on 28 June 2025. Heavier rains, droughts and other extreme weather are hitting poorer countries hardest, yet a new report says most climate aid from rich nations still comes as loans. AP - Manish Swarup

The world's poorest countries, mostly in Africa, got less than one-fifth of the climate funding provided by rich governments in 2021-2022. Small island nations received barely 3 percent. More than half of what they got was money they have to repay.

"This is one of the most unjust actions that rich nations can take – they are profiting from the pain of others," the NGOs said.

The focus on loans also means that projects likely to make a profit, such as renewable energy plants, are more likely to get support than essential but less profitable work like building irrigation systems in drought-prone areas.

"We would rather invest in a solar energy project in Kenya, for example, to sell electricity and generate revenue," said Huart. “In contrast, irrigation projects to secure agriculture in the Sahel, even though they are important for improving drought resistance, get less funding because they are less profitable."

Worldwide, only about one-third of climate funding goes to adaptation, even though this is a top priority for many countries in the global south.

Aid cuts compound crisis

Rich countries delivered their long-promised 100-billion-dollar climate pledge two years late. Now many are cutting aid even as climate impacts worsen. OECD figures show development aid fell by 9 percent in 2024 and could drop by another 9 to 17 percent in 2025.

Money to help countries recover from climate disasters is stilling falling critically short. The Loss and Damage Fund set up at Cop28 has received only about 800 million dollars in pledges, far short of the hundreds of billions experts say are needed.

Oxfam and CARE estimate that only about 1 percent of climate funding in 2022 went to this kind of support.

"Rich countries are failing on climate finance and they have nothing like a plan to live up to their commitments," said John Norbo, senior climate adviser at CARE Denmark. “Cop30 must deliver justice, not another round of empty promises."
UNESCO board selects Egypt's former antiquities minister El-Enany as new chief


UNESCO is set to appoint Egypt's Khaled El-Enany as its new director general, according to diplomatic sources. The cultural agency's executive board on Monday voted 55 to 2 in favor of Egypt's former tourism and antiquities minister, whose name will be put forward for approval to UNESCO's members in November.


Issued on: 06/10/2025 -
By: FRANCE 24

Khaled El-Enany, former Minister of Tourism and Antiquities of Egypt and candidate to become the head of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) poses during a photo session in Paris on October 1, 2025. 
© Joël Saget, AFP file photo

The UN culture agency's executive board on Monday voted to appoint a former Egyptian minister as the agency's next chief, the board's chair said, as UNESCO grapples with accusations of bias and the United States' withdrawal from the organisation.

UNESCO's board backed former Egyptian antiquities and tourism minister Khaled el-Enany to replace outgoing French director-general Audrey Azoulay, after she served two four-year terms in office.

The organisation's general assembly must now ratify the 54-year-old Egyptologist's appointment during its meeting in Uzbekistan on November 6.

The body has never gone against a recommendation by the executive board, which is made up of 58 out of 194 member states.

Enany won 55 of the 57 votes cast, said the board's chair, Vera Lacoeuilhe.

The United States, which has announced its withdrawal from the organisation, did not take part in the vote.

Only two candidates were in the running for the top job, after a Mexican contender backed out in August.

Enany, who emerged as the favourite, faced off against the Republic of Congo's Firmin Edouard Matoko, who had served as UNESCO's de facto foreign minister until March.

Enany oversaw antiquities, and later also tourism, from 2016 to 2022 under President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

Since announcing his bid more than two years ago, he claimed to have visited 65 countries, meeting 400 people over 30 months on the campaign trail.

If his nomination is confirmed, he will take office on November 14 as UNESCO's first director-general from an Arab country and the second from an African nation, after Senegal's Amadou Mahtar Mbow, who served from 1974 to 1987.

Enany would take the reins at a difficult time for UNESCO - best known for establishing world heritage sites - after the United States announced in June that it would leave the organisation, claiming it was biased against Israel and promoted "divisive" causes.

That move, set to take effect at the end of 2026, will deal a major blow to the agency's finances, as Washington contributes eight percent of its budget.

Enany has said he would seek to bring the United States back into the organisation.

In May, Nicaragua also announced it was pulling out of UNESCO after it bestowed its annual press prize on a venerable Nicaraguan newspaper whose staff were forced into exile.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
TWENTY YEARS LATER

ICC convicts Sudan militia chief in first Darfur war crimes verdict


The International Criminal Court on Monday convicted Sudanese militia leader Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman of war crimes and crimes against humanity for brutal attacks in Darfur, marking the court’s first conviction related to the conflict. The Janjaweed chief was found guilty of multiple offenses, including rape, murder and torture committed between August 2003 and April 2004.



Issued on: 06/10/2025 - 
By: FRANCE 24

Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman attends a hearing at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands, on October 6, 2025. © Piroschka van de Wouw, AP
14:16



The International Criminal Court (ICC) on Monday convicted a feared Sudanese militia chief for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during brutal attacks in Darfur.

Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman, also known by the nom de guerre Ali Kushayb, was convicted of multiple crimes including rape, murder and torture carried out between August 2003 and at least April 2004.

"The chamber is convinced that the accused is guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crimes with which he has been charged," said ICC president judge Joanna Korner.

The sentence will be pronounced at a later date, she said.

The bespectacled Abd-Al-Rahman, wearing a blue suit and waistcoat with a scarlet tie, followed the proceedings impassively, occasionally taking notes.

Korner detailed harrowing accounts of gang rapes, abuse, and mass killing.

She said that on one occasion, Abd-Al-Rahman loaded around 50 civilians onto trucks, beating some with axes, before making them lie on the ground and ordering his troops to shoot them dead.

"The accused was not only giving orders... but was personally involved in the beatings and later was physically present and giving orders for the execution of those detained," said Korner.

Prosecutors had accused Abd-Al-Rahman of being a leading member of Sudan's infamous Janjaweed militia, who participated "enthusiastically" in multiple war crimes.

But Abd-Al-Rahman, who was born around 1949, has denied all the charges, telling the court they have got the wrong man.

"I am not Ali Kushayb. I do not know this person... I have nothing to do with the accusations against me," he told the court at a hearing in December 2024.

Read moreInternational court hears evidence in landmark Darfur war crimes case

But Korner said the court was "satisfied that the accused was the person known ... as Ali Kushayb", dismissing defence witnesses who had denied that.

Abd-Al-Rahman fled to the Central African Republic in February 2020 when a new Sudanese government announced its intention to cooperate with the ICC's investigation.

He said he then handed himself in because he was "desperate" and feared authorities would kill him.

Fighting broke out in Sudan's Darfur region when non-Arab tribes, complaining of systematic discrimination, took up arms against the Arab-dominated government.

Khartoum responded by unleashing the Janjaweed, a force drawn from among the region's nomadic tribes.

The United Nations says 300,000 people were killed and 2.5 million displaced in the Darfur conflict in the 2000s.
'Inflicted pain and suffering'

During the trial, the ICC chief prosecutor said Abd-Al-Rahman and his forces "rampaged across different parts of Darfur".

He "inflicted severe pain and suffering on women, children and men in the villages that he left in his wake", said Karim Khan, who has since stepped down as he faces allegations of sexual misconduct.

Abd-Al-Rahman is also thought to be an ally of deposed Sudanese leader Omar al-Bashir, who is wanted by the ICC on genocide charges.

Bashir, who ruled Sudan with an iron fist for nearly three decades, was ousted and detained in April 2019 following months of protests in Sudan.

He has not, however, been handed over to the ICC, based in The Hague, where he also faces multiple charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

ICC prosecutors are hoping to issue fresh arrest warrants related to the current crisis in Sudan.

Watch moreExclusive report: Investigating massacres in Sudan's war-torn Darfur region

Tens of thousands have been killed and millions displaced in a war between Sudan's army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which grew out of the Janjaweed militia.

The conflict, marked by claims of atrocities on all sides, has left the northeast African country on the brink of famine, according to aid agencies.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

 

Trump’s H1-B Clampdown And Its Ordered Impacts – Analysis

india passport map travel



By 

By Vivek Mishra and Yogesh Mohapatra


Donald Trump’s announcement in September 2025 that H-1B visa fees will rise from US$5,000 to US$100,000 has sent shockwaves throughout corporate America, India, and the world. This follows his statement two months prior, when he demanded that United States (US) tech giants such as Google and Microsoft “stop hiring in India” and bring jobs back to American soil, a concrete step in his “America First” labour push.

Reactions were immediate.

Tech investors and executives warned that these new hikes would cost companies millions and disproportionately hurt startups in the US. Indian officials also expressed alarm, as this announcement directly contradicts the celebratory February 2025 joint statement, which exalted the 300,000-strong Indian student community, contributing US$8 billion annually to the US economy.

Although the new steep fee applies to H1-B visa applicants from the next cycle, it has fuelled the political and communal rhetoric in the US, largely directed against Indians who are the largest recipients of this particular Visa category in the US. As the midterm campaign rhetoric builds momentum in the US, the H1-B visa shock is poised to become an economic and electoral flashpoint.

At the political level, these restrictions also feed into the xenophobic narrative which characterises the ‘Make America Great Again’ (MAGA) campaign, being consistently channelled against Indians in the US. The economic impact of these changes is wide-ranging, from IT firms and remittances to, skilled labour mobility in American universities.


The altered circumstances and new realities facing American immigration rules now pose new questions of how these changes would affect both economies, especially through changes in talent flows, the education landscape, and possibly even reverse migration.

Indian talent serves as a core pillar of the US tech workforce, both through direct employment and offshore services. In 2024 alone, Indian nationals received over 207,000 visas, and Indian companies secured 20 percent of all H-1B approvals, reflecting their dominance in the US visa pipeline. This presence is fueled by a growing stream of Indian students, who now represent a quarter of all international students in US universities. Many utilise the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme to work immediately following graduation, and eventually transition to full-time tech roles. Over time, many rise to leadership positions, as witnessed via the dominance of Indian-origin CEOs across Fortune 500 companies, including Google, IBM, Adobe, and Microsoft.

From an offshoring perspective, India’s tech industry is deeply entwined with US corporate operations. In FY 2024-2025, India’s outsourcing exports in customer service, market research, IT services, engineering, and other professional services were projected to reach US$210 billion. It will also employ around 5.8 million professionals, with the US alone accounting for about 60-65 percent of this demand.

Through initiatives such as the US-India Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (ICET) and the Technology Resilience and US-Trusted Partners (TRUST) programme, American companies have established nearly 1,800 global capability centres throughout India, employing 1.9 million people. These include major operations such as JP Morgan Chase’s 55,000-strong workforce and Microsoft’s 18,000 employees in India, with one of its largest research and development (R&D) hubs in Hyderabad. This degree of integration means that any immediate large-scale reshoring efforts would disrupt the day-to-day functions of US firms, which rely on these centres.

While Trump’s promise to bring tech jobs back to the US sounds appealing from a US perspective, it faces significant issues. The first is that the US does not have enough qualified personnel to fill the roles of these Indian workers. Under the Department of Labour’s Permanent Labor Certification (PERM) process, employers must first advertise the position and prove that no US citizen or permanent resident is qualified before sponsoring a foreign worker for a green card. Even with these safeguards, demand for Indian talent remains high for reasons besides filling gaps. Increasing H-1B shares in an occupation sector by just one percentage point correlates with a 0.2 percentage point drop in unemployment as well as a 0.1-0.26 percentage point faster earnings growth for US workers in that field.

Furthermore, the private sector has pushed back against reshoring proposals for practical reasons. Labour cost differences are immense as Indian IT professionals often earn a fraction of what Silicon Valley tech-sector workers do. This means that forcing work onshore would raise costs, devastate profit margins, and ultimately hinder innovation. History also suggests that these kinds of measures backfire. In 2020, when Trump temporarily banned several work visas, many companies increased remote offshoring, highlighting the limits of such mandates.

For India, a hiring freeze or visa clampdown by the US would be devastating. In FY 2024, India’s IT sector contributed around 7 percent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and benefited significantly from exports. 79 percent of India’s IT service revenue is export-driven, with the US being the largest market by far, responsible for 60 percent of tech export demand—nearly US$135 billion annually. This means that any kind of freeze would be detrimental to India’s GDP growth and trade balance.

Even a minor downturn in US tech spending already prompts these Indian IT firms to reduce hiring, meaning a political freeze would put hundreds of thousands of Indian jobs at risk and force far deeper layoffs. Beyond exports and employment, India is also the world’s top recipient of remittances, reaching a record US$129.4 billion in 2024 via remittances, with 27.7 percent coming from the US. Freezing work visas or employment by American companies could seriously affect these remittance flows, potentially weakening the rupee and causing strain on Indian households.

In response to US work visa restrictions, global redistribution of Indian talent could accelerate. Canada’s pro-immigration policies have already driven a 326 percent increase in Indian immigrants over the past decade, positioning them as the top source of international students, temporary workers, and permanent residents. Australia and Germany have also expanded migration programmes for those in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) field, while Indian student enrollment in European universities rose 45 percent between 2015 and 2023. This policy-driven redistribution is not unprecedented; companies such as Wipro opened digital innovation hubs in Germany during Trump’s first term, partly to mitigate US policy uncertainty.

As migration is becoming more accessible in other destinations, US tech firms risk losing access to vital talent. Silicon Valley’s innovation capacity would be severely impacted, as 55 percent of US unicorns have an immigrant founder, and 40 percent of those founders are Indians/Indian-origin. Slashing this pipeline could risk the next Google or Artificial Intelligence (AI) breakthrough being developed in Toronto or Berlin instead.

A forced decoupling from the US could also empower a reverse brain drain, with skilled Indian professionals returning home. Currently, there are around 1.8 million Indian students abroad, and some have returned and founded companies such as Ola and Flipkart. Through initiatives such as Startup India and the Ramalingaswami Fellowship, India is integrating its talent into its expanding tech and startup ecosystem. The country’s recent push for self-reliance would also strongly benefit from this talent. However, this reorientation would take years to come to fruition, and in the interim, the loss of opportunities in the US would slow growth and strain the India-US partnership.

Restricted talent mobility between India and the US could also have an expanded impact. Collaborative initiatives such as TRUST showcase the unique vantage point of India-US cooperative potential in critical sectors. The lack of government support or worse still, manufactured hostility, is certain to slow the momentum or end programmes that rely on the exchange of ideas, joint research, and co-innovation. If sustained, shutting American doors to Indians, mixed with political resistance in the form of anti-migrant sentiments, could cause Indian talent flows to pivot to other favourable geographies or countries. Germany has already begun to woo Indian workers to gain from the talent deflection caused by US policies under the Trump administration.

Ultimately, Trump’s policy reversal to raise visa fees twentyfold is geared to restrict the hiring of foreign talent, but it will impact India the most. America’s innovation edge against the world will be hurt while negatively affecting one of its most strategically important relationships. India’s tech sector and remittance flows may witness immediate jolts. However, the longer-term challenges lie in the potential redistribution of talent toward US competitors and the acceleration of India’s reverse brain drain.

As India weighs deeper ties with other partners, cultivating decades-long people mobility chains and dependence akin to the one in its coalition with Washington will be difficult to replicate. As the world stands on the brink of another technological revolution driven by AI, quantum computing, and robotics, talent may become as critical as territory. India should strive to leverage the boon-in-disguise components of the crisis that has ensued as a result of America’s policy changes in the migration sector.


About the authors:

  • Vivek Mishra is Deputy Director – Strategic Studies Programme at the Observer Research Foundation
  • Yogesh Mohapatra was a Research Intern with the Observer Research Foundation

Source: This article was published by the Observer Research Foundation


Observer Research Foundation

ORF was established on 5 September 1990 as a private, not for profit, ’think tank’ to influence public policy formulation. The Foundation brought together, for the first time, leading Indian economists and policymakers to present An Agenda for Economic Reforms in India. The idea was to help develop a consensus in favour of economic reforms.

 

‘We have the product to play the game’: Can BYD’s meteoric rise in Europe continue?

BYD's Maria Grazia Davino chats to Hannah Brown on The Big Question
BYD's Maria Grazia Davino chats to Hannah Brown on The Big Question Euronews
Copyright Euronews

By Hannah Brown
Published on 

“The conversion rate from test drive to purchase is outstanding in every market,” BYD’s Maria Grazia Davino told The Big Question.

As the popularity of EVs continues to grow in Europe, so too does the strength of Chinese manufacturer BYD. 

The firm's first models, the Atto 3, Han and Tang, officially hit European forecourts in late 2022, though other companies had begun importing them in the preceding years. Since then, their range has grown to offer at least 10 different vehicles.

According to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), BYD had a 1.1% market share of new vehicle registrations in the EU in July 2025, up from 0.4% in the same period the year before. 

In the first half of 2025, unit sales increased 251.3% compared to the previous year, while EU new car registrations on the whole decreased 0.7% in that same period.

But with increased import tariffs for Chinese manufacturers making it harder to stay competitive, are European fears of a Chinese takeover unfounded

In this episode of The Big Question, Euronews reporter Hannah Brown sat down with Maria Grazia Davino, senior vice president and regional managing director at BYD Europe, to discuss the firm’s vision for its future in the bloc. 

BYD takes on Europe

Davino, who joined the company earlier this year from Stellantis, spoke with a clear confidence in BYD’s vehicles. Perhaps, in part, due to her own experience.

“People sit in the car and you surprisingly see that the immediate acceptance is there—actually we exceed customers' expectations,” she explained. 

“This is not only my direct experience, [it’s] what I observe, what customers tell me, what dealers tell me. The conversion rate from test drive to purchase is outstanding in every market.”

“BYD comes to Europe with a full commitment to enrich the industry,” Davino told The Big Question. 

“We have superior technology and the product to play the game. There has been some narrative around it—like ‘you want to conquer’—no, it's not about conquering, we can't, we are so small compared to the others. 

“I always say we are fuelled by the challenges that also humble us, and we are here to enrich the industry.”

Tougher competition for non-European companies

Right now in the EU, Chinese manufacturers pay an additional import tariff, on top of the standard 10%. SAIC, once China’s largest auto manufacturers, faces the steepest additional tariff at 35.3%. Geely, the parent company of Volvo, pays 18.8%, and BYD pays 17%. 

Many vehicles made by the US firm Tesla are also manufactured in China, although the company’s additional tariff comes to just 7.8%. Despite this, BYD managed to outsell Musk’s famous EV brand in Europe for the first time in April 2025. 

In addition to these tariffs, France recently announced incentives for consumers to buy EVs assembled in Europe and equipped with a European battery, a move designed to support European manufacturers

“It just makes the competition tougher, but we are okay in competing,” Davino said. 

“That's our company culture, you know. We are there to collaborate and compete, so we'll have to face it, be better, find alternatives so we will continue to compete.”

In a bid to strengthen the company’s presence in the bloc and boost competitiveness by avoiding import tariffs, BYD has established a manufacturing plant in Hungary. Production is set to begin by the end of the year.

“So the first product we will be producing there is a Dolphin Surf. And that's just a start, because at our plants, we can produce more than one car line, so that makes our productivity very flexible,” Davino told The Big Question. 

“The teams at the dealers are also growing, and our brand in the market requests a certain number of qualified salespeople. So we also contribute to the [training and] qualification of these people.”

Will hybrids continue to outperform EVs?

Right now, hybrids are the most popular vehicle by power type, making up 34.8% of all new car registrations in Europe in the first half of 2025. 

The key to their popularity, according to Davino, is that they’re providing a “convenient alternative”.

“You have a true electric vehicle with a 100km range. For example with the Seal 6 DM-i Touring that we have brought on the market now, just launched, you have a vehicle that does not give you any anxiety. With our vehicle, you can go up to 1,350 kilometres range,” She claimed that recent drivers were able to drive from Warsaw to Munich without needing to stop to refuel. 

As technology improves and EV range increases, Davino said she can’t predict if the popularity of full electrics will surpass hybrids, emphasising that it's consumers deciding the fate of the industry. 

The Big Question* is a series from Euronews Business where we sit down with industry leaders and experts to discuss some of the most important topics on today’s agenda.****

Watch the video to see the full discussion with BYD’s Maria Grazia Davino. 


‘When people buy an EV, they rarely go back’: Hyundai CEO on designing for Europe

Hannah Brown chats to Xavier Martinet, CEO of Hyundai Motor Europe on The Big Question.
Hannah Brown chats to Xavier Martinet, CEO of Hyundai Motor Europe on The Big Question. Euronews

Copyright Euronews

By Hannah Brown
Published on 

“If you're the second preferred vehicle for the customer, you're the first one they're not buying,” Xavier Martinet, President and CEO of Hyundai Motor Europe, told The Big Question.

Hyundai is probably one of South Korea’s most globally recognisable brands, with only the likes of Samsung and LG also vying for the title. 

The Hyundai Motor Group, which owns Kia and Genesis, first arrived in Europe in the late 1970s. However, it was only in 1997 that they opened their first production site outside of South Korea, in Turkey. 

“If you look at personal cars we're at 4% market share in Europe, we're ranked number 10 on the market,” said Xavier Martinet, President and CEO of Hyundai Motor Europe. 

“When you look back in time, 10-15 years ago we were at half this market share, so Hyundai has been growing over time.” 

In their 58 years of business, the company has managed to produce more than 100 million units worldwide and its factory in Ulsan, South Korea, is the largest automotive production plant in the world. 

In this episode of The Big Question, Hannah Brown sat down with Xavier to discuss Hyundai’s place in the European market and how it sees the future of automotive power.

Hyundai in Europe

Aside from the production plant in Turkey, Hyundai has also been producing vehicles at a plant in NoÅ¡ovice, Czech Republic, since 2008. Together, the two sites have a production capacity of 560,000 units per year. 

According to Xavier, 79% of the vehicles sold by Hyundai in Europe in 2024 were produced in these two plants. 

However, the greater-than-predicted success of their smallest EV to date, the INSTER, produced in South Korea, is expected to roll that number back to 70% in 2025. 

While Xavier insists there’s no third plant planned in Europe just yet, he suggested that regional success for the firm’s newest releases could ignite a conversation around future investment. 

A new EV from Hyundai

Hyundai recently announced the Concept 3 car, an EV in its IONIQ range that’s expected to hit the market early next year. 

Positioned in the B-segment, accompanied by the likes of the Ford Fiesta, the Renault Clio and the Peugeot 208, the compact Concept 3 underlines Hyundai’s focus on offering EVs across all market segments—according to Xavier.

“What we see, for example, is that the EV mix is actually higher for fleet customers (who typically buy C- or D-segment vehicles), but retail buyers right now have a lower mix of EV. They still want to buy the old ones because either they don't find the car they want or the price is too high,” he explained.   

“And this is why for us targeting this lower part of the segment with strong EV propositions was fundamental.”

He also highlighted the need to tailor vehicles specifically to the European audience. 

“We need to develop products that are really taking into account European customers’ needs, lifestyles, demands—and the Concept 3 is a perfect illustration of that. When we do have global products, we need to calibrate them because you don't drive on the German Autobahn like you drive on an Interstate in the US, so we need to be able to really adjust and fine-tune the vehicle characteristics so that vehicles satisfy the customers wherever they drive,” Xavier told The Big Question.

What will power cars in the future?

Despite targets to boost EV uptake and Hyundai’s Concept 3 announcement, hybrid cars remain the most popular vehicle type for new purchases in Europe.

“Customers are usually keeping a car an average of six years in Europe. And for them to go directly from an internal combustion engine vehicle to an EV is an act of faith,” Xavier explained. 

However, Hyundai isn't putting all their eggs into one metaphorical EV basket. They’re also leading innovation in the hydrogen-powered vehicle world. 

“EVs are one great way to electrify the car park, but we also have some questions about access to rare earth materials and whether these tensions will really change,” Xavier said. 

“So it's quite interesting to develop some kind of alternative that one day might become quite valuable as a compliment. So we're not opposing the two, we're just saying it's good to have different solutions to decarbonise the car industry.”

Right now, the hydrogen-powered vehicle market in Europe is virtually non-existent, with sales only in the hundreds. Cost and infrastructure are two of the main limitations, although Hyundai’s US branch is working on solutions. 

“We're developing a car, bus, truck, and when you look at our plant in Savannah, Georgia in the US, we are also producing our own hydrogen. So, at the end of the day, you are not talking about one car, you talk about an ecosystem,” Xavier explained. 

In a symbol of its commitment to diversifying power solutions, Hyundai has pledged to offer European customers an EV, hybrid, plug-in hybrid and hydrogen powered version of each of their models by 2027. 

The Big Question is a series from Euronews Business where we sit down with industry leaders and experts to discuss some of the most important topics on today’s agenda.

Watch the video to see the full discussion with Hyundai’s Xavier Martinet.