Wednesday, October 08, 2025





The shutdown is delaying Trump's farm bailout. Farmers say it won't be enough even when it happens.


Ben Werschkul · Washington Correspondent
Wed, October 8, 2025


The Trump administration has already missed a self-imposed deadline this week to announce its plan to help US soybean farmers. The gridlock on Capitol Hill means that the delays are likely to continue.

The shutdown is furloughing administration staffers needed to finalize and implement the farmer aid that had been promised to be unveiled on Tuesday, as well as putting on ice any additional money that lawmakers may need to provide.


For now, no new timing is imminent for an announcement, with a Department of Agriculture spokesperson telling Yahoo Finance Wednesday that the agency "will continue to assess the farm economy and explore the need for further assistance."

"However, there is nothing new to share at this time."

The limbo also comes as farmers are saying the varied dollar amounts being publicly floated won't be enough, even when the money eventually comes through.

American Soybean Association president Caleb Ragland recently appeared on Yahoo Finance and noted that proposed ideas for $10 billion to $14 billion in aid are akin to "putting a Band-Aid on an open wound."

"We are bleeding economically," he added, saying eventual relief will come "by not having tariffs that are in place," referring to both President Trump's tariffs and the countermeasures from foreign nations.

Soybeans being harvested in Warren Indiana in September. 
(AP Photo/Michael Conroy) · 

Farmers are caught between foreign countermeasures with significant effects (Chinese purchases of US soybeans have fallen from $12.6 billion last year to $0 currently) and a large harvest that is now underway and may be impossible to sell at a profit.

Ragland's group estimates that soybean farmers are facing losses of $109 per acre this fall.


Farmer Blake Hurst, former president of the Missouri Farm Bureau, added in his own comments that Trump's tariff plans have, in his view, been "a complete bust."

More important to Hurst than a bailout is that he wants Trump to "drop the tariffs and resume normal trade relations."

Stuck in the middle of the shutdown fight


For the moment, any aid is part of the partisan fighting in Washington.

White House deputy press secretary Kush Desai recently posted, "Help is on the way for American farmers — just not from the Democrats who shut our government down and threw a wrench in our ability to deliver for the American people."

A message likewise greets visitors to the US Department of Agriculture website, blaming "Radical Left" Democrats for the shutdown and adding that Trump "wants to keep the government open and support those who feed, fuel, and clothe the American people."


Both Desai and the USDA spokesperson declined to address whether contingency plans might be forthcoming to get any money out before the shutdown ends or whether new legislation from Congress would be needed.

The USDA spokesperson did tout current measures in place to help farmers, including lower taxes implemented in the recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

"Currently, the farm economy is in a difficult situation, and President Trump is utilizing all the tools available to ensure farmers have what they need to continue their farming operations," the spokesperson said.

President Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on Oct. 7
. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) · ASSOCIATED PRESS

The delay also comes as the shape of the eventual bailout plan remains in flux, with multiple reports that a $10 billion to $14 billion plan could be in the offing.

A recent Politico report outlined a plan for a $12 billion to $13 billion bailout by reallocating funds from internal USDA accounts.

But the shutdown is throwing a wrench into even those plans, with the report noting that delays are expected because USDA officials are furloughed.


More limited government options


It also comes as questions continue about how much Trump may ultimately be able to do short of asking a slow-moving Congress to approve new money.

In his first term, Trump offered a series of bailouts to tariff-impacted farmers and was largely able to do so by tapping existing administration sources.


The scale of that unilateral action may not be possible this time around. The USDA's Commodity Credit Corporation fund was used last time to provide $28 billion in farm aid.

But that fund is apparently running low, and lawmakers have reportedly said there is just $4 billion left. Alternative funding methods may be possible without going to Congress, but those remain unclear, as Trump himself has often touted using tariff revenues to pay farmers.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in recent days that she is in regular consultation with both the president and Congress about getting the money needed, but without specifying an amount or a timeline.

Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins speaks to reporters at the White House on Sept. 30. (Reuters/Ken Cedeno) · REUTERS / Reuters

And previous timelines have fallen by the wayside.

Last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promised during a CNBC interview that a substantial package for farmers would be unveiled on Tuesday, a deadline that has now come and gone.

National Black Farmers Association founder and president John Boyd Jr. recently said that the delay comes during one of the worst times in history for farmers and that the moment has already seen "the administration slow to react."

In Boyd's view, Trump and his team are also making matters worse by entertaining a $20 billion currency swap to aid Argentina, even during the shutdown, to prop up the troubled — but very Trump-friendly — administration of President Javier Milei.

That nation and its own soybean production have recently emerged to help fill the gap for Chinese purchases and further undercut American farmers.

Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance.


ICE Barbie Triggered by Man in Chicken Suit on Portland Trip

Adam Downer
Tue, October 7, 2025
THE DAILY BEAST

PATRICK T. FALLON / AFP via Getty Images


Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is facing down an “army of Antifa” protestors in “war-ravaged” Portland, starting off by disapproving of a person in a chicken suit.

In a video posted Tuesday by MAGA influencer Benny Johnson, Noem, 53, stands atop Portland, Oregon’s ICE facility and surveys a scene of a few protestors scattered about the street. In the crowd is a person dressed like a chicken.

“DHS Secretary Kristi Noem stares down army of Antifa and a guy in a chicken suit from the rooftop of the ICE facility here in Portland!” gushed Johnson in his post.

“Noem isn’t chicken,” he added with an emoji of a chicken.


Demonstrators at ICE facilities have dressed in various costumes. / Spencer Platt / Getty Images




In the video, Johnson asks if Noem has a message for “the man in the chicken suit,” to which she says, “Man in the chicken outfit? I just see him now. Goodness sakes. You can do better,” before calling the protesters “uneducated and ill-informed.”

Animal costumes have been a staple of the Portland protests. A person in a chicken suit was pictured protesting at night on October 3rd. ICE has also pepper-sprayed a person in a frog costume.

Elsewhere in Portland, a group of senior citizens are going viral for protesting by singing “This Land Is Your Land” on ukuleles
.


Despite Johnson’s hyperbolic description of the scene in Portland, viewers weren’t impressed by Noem’s bravery in the face of a couple dozen of the city’s residents.

“LOL THERE’S LIKE EIGHT F---ING PEOPLE THERE!!!” tweeted Democratic strategist Adam Parkhomenko.

“Even this pure Goebbels-style propaganda gives us enough information to know that Portland is not a war-zone,” said attorney Ben Yelin.




Chicago mayor responds to Trump’s call for him to be jailed

Indeed, the video doesn’t jive with conservative characterizations of Portland as a “third world hellhole” that requires assistance from the National Guard to quell a violent insurrection. However, someone in Johnson’s video can be heard insisting that Tuesday’s scene is “nothing” compared to what it’s like at night.


Some arrests have been made during the Portland protests, the most notable being of conservative self-styled citizen Nick Sortor, who was detained for fighting with two protestors and released after a few hours.

Portland residents insist that ICE is the one causing chaos amidst the protests. Portland City Attorney Robert Taylor wrote to the U.S. Department of Justice criticizing the “unconstitutional uses of force in violation of the Fourth Amendment against otherwise peaceful demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights.”

“Does the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice care about the Constitution anymore?” he asked.

Former Trump official ‘Anonymous’ warns troops in cities are ‘false flag’

Filip Timotija
THE HILL 


Former Trump official ‘Anonymous’ warns troops in cities are ‘false flag’


A former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official who wrote under the pseudonym “Anonymous” claimed that the Trump administration’s deployment of troops to U.S. cities is a “false flag” operation meant to provide a rationale for ”harsh crackdowns.”

“I co-wrote Trump’s first anti-terrorism plan in 2017-18. He’s not trying to stop ‘left-wing’ terrorism. He is staging it,” Miles Taylor, a vocal Trump critic who served as a deputy chief of staff at DHS during the president’s first term, said in a Tuesday morning post on social platform X.

“His troop deployments are a false flag — meant to provoke a response in order to justify harsh crackdowns,” Taylor added.

“This is now very obvious.”

In recent months, Trump has authorized the deployment of National Guard troops to multiple Democratic-led states, including California, Oregon and Illinois. Governors of those states have pushed back on the effort. The president has also greenlighted the deployment of National Guard members to Washington, D.C.

On Sunday, a federal judge temporarily blocked the administration from sending National Guard troops to Oregon. Chicago and Illinois sued on Monday to block the administration from deploying the National Guard to the Windy City.

Trump floated on Monday that he was considering invoking the Insurrection Act to justify the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland, Ore.. The president called the situation in Portland an “insurrection.”

“Portland is on fire. Portland’s been on fire for years,” Trump said.

On Tuesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi declined to answer a question about if she had talks with Trump about legal justification for deploying National Guard troops to U.S. cities.

“I am not going to discuss any internal conversations with the White House,” she told Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.


JB Pritzker Warns Rachel Maddow Trump Wants Americans to ‘Get Used to the Idea’ of Military Troops on Their Streets | Video


Taylor wrote a New York Times op-ed and later a book under the pseudonym “Anonymous” about how some officials worked to thwart Trump’s impulses during his first term.

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 

Trump calls for jailing Democratic leaders as troops prepare for Chicago deployment

By Brendan O'Brien, Susan Heavey and Andy Sullivan
Wed, October 8, 2025 
REUTERS


Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker talks with NPR Morning Edition host Steve Inskeep during a visit to the Chicago neighborhood of Pilsen, days after U.S. President Donald Trump ordered an increased federal law enforcement presence in the city along with stepped-up immigration enforcement actions carried out by the Department of Homeland Security, in Chicago, Illinois, U.S. September 9, 2025. REUTERS/Octavio JonesMore

By Brendan O'Brien, Susan Heavey and Andy Sullivan

CHICAGO/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday called for jailing Chicago's mayor and the governor of Illinois, both Democrats, as his administration prepared to deploy military troops to the streets of the third-largest U.S. city.

Trump's call to imprison two prominent opponents of his immigration crackdown comes as another high-profile political rival, former FBI Director James Comey, was due to appear in court to face criminal charges that have been widely criticized as flimsy.

Trump has frequently called for jailing his opponents since he first entered politics in 2015, but Comey is the first to face prosecution.

On his social media platform, Trump accused Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker of failing to protect immigration officers who have been operating in Chicago.

"Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers! Governor Pritzker also!" Trump wrote, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel.

Johnson and Pritzker could not be immediately reached for comment.

Hundreds of Texas National Guard soldiers have gathered at an Army facility outside Chicago, over the objections of Pritzker, Johnson and other Democratic leaders in the state. Trump has threatened to deploy troops to more U.S. cities, which he said last week could serve as "training grounds" for the armed forces.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday found most Americans oppose the deployment of troops without an external threat.


Trump has ordered Guard troops to Chicago and Portland, Oregon, following his earlier deployments to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. In each case, he has defied staunch opposition from Democratic mayors and governors, who say Trump's claims of lawlessness and violence do not reflect reality.

"My goal is very simple. STOP CRIME IN AMERICA!" he wrote on his social media platform.

Violent crime has been falling in many U.S. cities since a COVID-era spike, and National Guard troops have so far been largely used to protect federal facilities, not fight street crime.

Protests over Trump's immigration policies in Chicago and Portland had been largely peaceful and limited in size, according to local officials, far from the conditions described by Trump administration officials.

"What we have going on right now is literally domestic terrorism in Chicago," Todd Blanche, the No. 2 Justice Department official, said on Fox News.

Pritzker has accused Trump of trying to foment violence to justify further militarization, and his state has sued to stop the deployment. A federal judge on Monday permitted the deployment to proceed for the time being. Another federal judge has blocked the deployment to Portland.

Trump has threatened to invoke an anti-insurrection law to sidestep any court orders blocking him, which was last invoked during the Los Angeles riots of 1992.

(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien in Chicago, and Susan Heavey and Katharine Jackson in Washington; Writing by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Frank McGurty)

Clash intensifies over Trump’s troop deployments

Jared Gans
Tue, October 7, 2025


Clash intensifies over Trump’s troop deployments

President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops in an increasing number of U.S. cities is drawing intense backlash as Democrats turn to the courts to try to stop him.

National Guard troops from Texas are headed to Illinois after a federal judge on Monday declined to immediately issue a restraining order against the deployment. The judge, an appointee of former President Biden, set a hearing for Thursday.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) has vowed to fight the deployment, which he likens to an “invasion,” and the state of Illinois and city of Chicago ripped Trump’s move in their lawsuit filed Monday.

“The American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president’s favor,” the complaint reads.

While the administration is allowed to move ahead for now in Chicago, efforts to deploy 200 troops to Portland, Ore., were blocked by another federal judge over the weekend. That judge, a Trump appointee, called the U.S. a “nation of constitutional law, not martial law.”

“The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts,” U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut wrote in her ruling Saturday.

Trump responded to the ruling by seeking to send the California National Guard into Portland, enraging California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Immergut then granted California, Oregon and Portland’s request for a temporary restraining order to block that deployment.

Democratic officials have been adamant about pushing back against the president’s moves and using every lever at their disposal to resist.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (D) signed an executive order Monday barring federal immigration authorities from using city property in their operations, declaring the city an “ICE-free zone.”

“This isn’t about public safety, it’s about power,” Newsom said in a release. “The commander-in-chief is using the U.S. military as a political weapon against American citizens. We will take this fight to court, but the public cannot stay silent in the face of such reckless and authoritarian conduct by the President of the United States.”

Trump has also made clear he won’t back down.

The president has regularly lambasted Chicago as the “worst and most dangerous” city in the world and has signaled for months the city is a top target for his push to crack down on crime.

The president on Monday also argued the situation in Portland amounted to an “insurrection,” telling reporters he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act if necessary.

“Portland is on fire. Portland’s been on fire for years,” Trump said. “And not so much saving it. We have to save something else. Because I think that’s all insurrection. I really think that’s really criminal insurrection.”

Last week, the commander-in-chief told hundreds of generals and admirals at the Pentagon’s meeting at Quantico, Va., that “dangerous” U.S. cities should be used as “training grounds” for the military.

The flurry of deployments and lawsuits are expected to only increase and follow similar moves to deploy troops to Memphis and Washington, D.C., the latter of which also sparked a legal challenge from local leaders.

Trump has leaned into the battles with Democratic leaders as polls show combatting crime to be among his strongest areas for his approval rating.

The faceoffs have also given more attention to Pritzker and Newsom, both of whom are viewed as likely 2028 presidential candidates.


OCT 11 NATIONWIDE SOBEYS PROTEST

 Sobeys continues to support cruel cage confinement for hens.


On Saturday, October 11, 2025, Canadians in CalgaryCharlottetownEdmontonMontrealOttawaSt. John’sTorontoVancouverWinnipeg will come together to say: No more cages. No more excuses.

(Charlottetown protest: October 12).

Despite public outrage and its own cage-free promises, Sobeys continues to support cruel cage confinement for hens. While Sobeys is now telling us it is “working to increase the availability of cage free eggs across our stores,” the company hasn’t offered any plan or measurable goals. This is unacceptable and we’re not staying silent.


That’s why Animal Justice is organizing nationwide protests at Sobeys locations and we need your voice.

What to expect:
 🔊 Megaphone-led chanting and action
 📣 Peaceful protest with signs and public outreach
 🤝 Passionate, animal-loving community energy

Let’s show Sobeys that compassionate consumers won’t accept cruelty on grocery store shelves. Together, we can turn up the pressure—and help make cages history in Canada.

Find your local protest and RSVP now!

Join a Protest in Your City
France

After Lecornu, let’s fight for a popular government of change!


Wednesday 8 October 2025, by NPA - Nouveau Parti Anticapitaliste


Three little turns and then they’re gone. Barely arrived, the Lecornu government is already gone. Nearly a month after his appointment, Sébastien Lecornu unveiled a government made up of revenants and the undead: Darmanin, Retailleau, Dati, and even Le Maire... Twelve hours later, Lecornu resigned, marking the shortest term of any prime minister in the Fifth Republic and symbolising a political crisis that is deepening and accelerating.


Macron embodies an illegitimate, moribund, weak and hated power. With each passing day, the crisis of the regime deepens. Macron is now incapable of finding a government that can last more than a few days. In this context, he will have to push his alliances further and further to the right, until he brings the RN to power. Whether he does so by appointing an RN prime minister or by dissolving the National Assembly, his only roadmap is to continue the supply-side policy that serves the richest and the employers. The RN will pursue violently anti-migrant, racist and freedom-destroying policies, in addition to being openly favourable to the ruling classes. Le Pen and Bardella have long since given all their pledges to employers and the MEDEF (French Business Confederation).

While Macron presented himself in 2017 as the supposed bulwark against the far right, he has paved the way for it during his two terms in office. He bears full responsibility for the crisis we are experiencing. There is only one thing left for him to do: leave!

Tomorrow or in a few days, the RN and behind it all the most reactionary, authoritarian and racist forces in this country could take power (as they have already done in the USA, Russia and Israel). Faced with this grim prospect, the NPA-l’Anticapitaliste calls on the entire social and political left to discuss and meet urgently to prepare for the victory of our camp and to block the far right. First and foremost, we must strengthen the mobilisations that will follow the successful ones of 10 and 18 September. Political organisations, trade unions, associations, ‘Bloquons tout’ (Let’s block everything), we must march together around a programme that has majority support among the population: the programme based on that of the NFP and the demands that the inter-union group put forward for 18 September constitute a basis for a popular government of rupture.

In the broadest possible unity, workers and young people must take back the offensive and, through their mobilisations, impose a genuine social, democratic and environmental break with the past. Our slogans to put an end to Macron and the Fifth Republic: unity of the social and political forces of the left, general strike, workers’ government and constituent assembly! Everything must be done to ensure that these demands, which are supported by the majority of the population, are met as quickly as possible: a genuine sharing of wealth, taxation of the rich, a ban on redundancies, retirement at 60, the development of public services and free access to them, and increases in wages, pensions and all social minima!

Let’s all take to the streets together!

6 October 2025

Translated by International Viewpoint from NPA-l’Anticapitaliste.


Attached documentsafter-lecornu-let-s-fight-for-a-popular-government-of_a9209.pdf (PDF - 905.2 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9209]

France
Between Macron’s Crisis and Le Pen’s Threat: France’s Left Seeks a Way Forward
In Palestine as in international solidarity, we must turn to resistance
10 September: building a mass movement to break with Macron and his world
Kryvyi Rih — Vermont — Paris!
Down with imperialist wars, no to the Paris Air Show!

NPA - Nouveau Parti Anticapitaliste
The New Anti-Capitalist Party in France was founded in 2009 on the call of the LCR (French section of the Fourth International).


International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.
A New Step in the Radicalisation of the Far Right in the Netherlands

Saturday 4 October 2025, by Alex de Jong


It’s always risky to make predictions, but we may well look back on the riots in The Hague on 20 September 2024 [following protests against plans for a new asylum seeker centre in the Schilderswijk neighbourhood,] as merely the beginning. Here and there it now seems to be dawning even on parliamentary left parties that the far right cannot be brought to reason through civilised exchange of opinions. But an adequate response is still far off.


On 20 September the Nazi mob carried Prince’s flags [The Prince’s flag (Prinsenvlag) is an orange-white-blue flag historically associated with the Dutch Republic but now used by far-right groups as a nationalist symbol with the logo of the VOC (Dutch East India Company), since adopted by far-right groups as a symbol glorifying Dutch colonial history

Of course, the riots didn’t come out of the blue. Much has already been said about how a stream of propaganda from parties such as FvD, [1] PVV [2] and BBB [3] incites the far right’s urge towards violence. In the Netherlands, the far right has now become mainstream. Racism cannot be ignored; Dutch far-right forces have their own means of spreading their worldview. The PVV is the country’s largest party and its talking points are eagerly repeated by supposed centre-right forces, whether it’s the VVD [4] or De Telegraaf. [5]

Far-right violence is nothing new in the Netherlands. The first riots against ’guest workers’ took place as early as the early 1970s. And more recently we saw, for example, attacks on anti-racists during protests against Zwarte Piet [(Black Pete) is a blackface character in Dutch Christmas traditions, which has been the subject of sustained anti-racist protests since 2011] The far right was also very active in the riots during the coronavirus period.

What was new was that on 20 September violent far-right activists—fascists, that is—not only reacted but chose the moment themselves and did so under their own flag. This marks the increased self-confidence of these people. The white-power flags and Nazi salute are no longer limited to internal parties. When the far right attacks (Black) anti-racists, that’s hardly news. When it also turned against the police and politicians on 20 September, that still came as a surprise to some.

The refusal of the left parties to sign the so-called declaration against far-right violence was the right choice. The only effect of such a declaration, arising from the CU’s [6] urge to profile itself as morally superior, is that the far-right parties who sign it get an alibi. Meanwhile they continue unabated spewing civil war rhetoric and dehumanising entire groups.

What doesn’t help, however, is that the SP [7] as the only left party supported a motion submitted by this same far right. The letter of the motion for ’the right of every Dutch citizen to non-violently resist the arrival of an AZC (Asielzoekerscentrum — Asylum Seeker Centre) is pointless; that right already exists and is certainly not in danger of being banned. The cabinet would rather ban left-wing organisations. The spirit of this motion is, of course, to encourage racist protests. In addition, it is a way for parliamentary far-right forces to show, after they had signed the CU declaration, that they have no substantive disagreement with the rioters, but merely a tactical disagreement about the use of violence.

Van der Plas’s [8] motion to introduce an asylum freeze through emergency legislation shows that she wants the BBB to be seen as the party that accommodates fascists. The indignation about this motion was widespread, but also rather hypocritical. Van der Plas’s argument that the violence is actually caused by the presence of refugees is, after all, nothing new. And left parties too assume that racism is a ’natural’ and inevitable response to the arrival of migrants, and that this response should be contained by limiting migration. Sometimes this reasoning is dressed up by talking about how the ’support base in society’ shouldn’t be overburdened, but the reasoning is the same.

Quite apart from the question of why migrants should have to pay for the racism that confronts them, it is hopelessly naïve to think that the far right could be ’taken down a peg’ in this way. Whether 100,000, 1,000 or 10 migrants enter the country, for the far right it will always be too many. With the cooperation of parliamentary left forces, provisions for asylum seekers have been so dismantled that any increase, however small or temporary, can be declared a ’crisis’ and a ’flood’ with the help of De Telegraaf’s screaming headlines.

A similar naivety was evident in much of the commentary that former minister Marjolein Faber [9] received from the liberal-left corner. ’The minister achieved nothing’ was often the tenor. Was Faber’s biggest problem then that she wasn’t effective enough in making it impossible for refugees to find safe refuge and respectful treatment? What Faber did do was create a continuous crisis atmosphere and hammer home that refugees are the Netherlands’ misfortune. The ’mass migration’ that the far right rails against is a phantom, and the last thing the far right wants is to break the grip that such illusions have.

The rise and further radicalisation of the far right is, of course, not unique to the Netherlands; it is a worldwide pattern. Looking back, the first election of Donald Trump was a key moment. Trump’s success also came as a surprise to many of his supporters. And for the far right, this success held several lessons. The first lesson was that it is not necessary to strongly moderate one’s own propaganda for electoral success. The number of right-wing voters who withdraw their support because of open racism and sexism is very limited and is compensated for by the energy of the true believers. Second lesson: once Trump was in power, liberals limited themselves to much fuss about his tone and coarse manners, but practically speaking what they did was mainly wait in the hope that after the elections things would return to ’normal’. Amidst a historic disaster like the pandemic this was enough for the Democrats, but four years later Harris went down ignominiously.

About twenty years ago, one of the differences between the Netherlands, compared with countries like France with the Front National, [10] Belgium with Vlaams Blok, [11] or Austria with the FPÖ, [12] was that the most right-wing parties here had no ties to historical fascism. Groups in the 1980s and 1990s whose members did have such ties, such as CP86 [13] and Hans Janmaat’s CD, [14] remained marginal partly for this reason. Geert Wilders and before him Pim Fortuyn [15] were precisely bourgeois-right politicians radicalising to the right. At the beginning of his career, Wilders still distanced himself from the Front National. Today he is one of the greatest allies of the party renamed Rassemblement National.

The history of such parties is a contradictory process of radicalisation and adaptation to bourgeois right forces. In an important respect, such parties adapted to prevailing conditions. The classical fascist ideal of the one-party state was abandoned. Instead came the choice for the form but not the content of parliamentary democracy. An essential characteristic of democracy is that the group that is still the minority today can, through organisation and persuasion, strive to be the majority tomorrow. The classical left critique of this ideal picture is well known. Some groups have far more resources than others, and the extra-parliamentary power of capital, whether exercised through text messages to the prime minister or threats of capital flight, pays little heed to parliamentary majorities.

But parliamentary relations are not entirely meaningless either. And that is precisely what contemporary far-right forces want to change. Their aim is a state with the form of a parliamentary democracy in which elections no longer make a difference. Instead of banning all opposition parties, they want to make their work impossible. Instead of abolishing freedom of expression by law, unanimity is enforced in cooperation with well-funded media enterprises. To know what this strategy looks like, one need only look at Turkey or Hungary. And soon the United States? There is no reason to think the Netherlands would be immune to this.

Far-right parties are, in short, not normal parties, with at most an extra dose of racism. They want to fundamentally change the frameworks within which politics is possible.

It won’t stop with 20 September, that much is clear. In Doetinchem there were protests against an Asylum Seeker Centre complete with Nazi salutes; in Den Bosch dozens of right-wing extremists gathered for a planned storming of another Asylum Seeker Centre. Such a movement cannot be persuaded, and a strategy of giving in only encourages such movements. Such a movement can only be rendered harmless if it loses hope that its goal is achievable.

30 September 2025

Translated for ESSF by Adam Novak from Greenzeloos.

Attached documentsa-new-step-in-the-radicalisation-of-the-far-right-in-the_a9201.pdf (PDF - 927.4 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9201]

Footnotes


[1] Forum for Democracy (Forum voor Democratie), a nationalist far-right party founded in 2016 by Thierry Baudet


[2] Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid), Geert Wilders’ anti-Islam party founded in 2006, which became the largest party in the 2023 elections


[3] Farmer-Citizen Movement (BoerBurgerBeweging), an agrarian populist party founded in 2019


[4] People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie), the main conservative-liberal party


[5] De Telegraaf is the Netherlands’ largest tabloid newspaper, known for its right-wing populist editorial line


[6] ChristenUnie (Christian Union), a Christian democratic party


[7] Socialist Party (Socialistische Partij), a left-wing party that originated in Maoist politics but has moved towards social democracy


[8] Caroline van der Plas, leader of the BBB party


[9] Marjolein Faber of the PVV served as Minister of Asylum and Migration from July to September 2024, resigning after her controversial policies


[10] Front National, now renamed Rassemblement National (National Rally), is France’s main far-right party founded by Jean-Marie Le Pen


[11] Vlaams Blok (Flemish Block), a Flemish nationalist and far-right party in Belgium, banned in 2004 and succeeded by Vlaams Belang


[12] Freedom Party of Austria (Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs), a nationalist far-right party with historical ties to former Nazis


[13] Centrum Party ’86 (Centrumpartij ’86), a far-right party active in the 1980s with explicit neo-Nazi connections


[14] Centre Democrats (Centrumdemocraten), founded by Hans Janmaat as a splinter from the Centrum Party


[15] Pim Fortuyn, charismatic right-wing populist politician who was assassinated in 2002, nine days before parliamentary elections

Netherlands
Polski Strajk: first strike amongst temporary workers, mainly Polish migrant workers, in AH and Jumbo distribution centres
The Netherlands and the 1965 mass killings in Indonesia
Amsterdam riots and the wolf who cried antisemitism
Pinkwashing and Queer Dilemmas
Far-right electoral victory in the Netherlands
Far Right
The imperial engine of fascism
Labour panders to racism – playing the far right’s game
“The crisis of liberal hegemony is the reason why so many Europeans are turning to the extreme right”
The Carnation Revolution of Portugal Today: The New Challenge from the Far-Right
UK Supreme Court backs bigots and transphobes

Alex de Jong is editor of Grenzeloos, the journal of the Dutch section of the Fourth International.


International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.

Morocco


Against state repression and TU leaderships silence: youth movement needs support of working class










Sunday 5 October 2025, by Marwan

The youth movement in Morocco continues to defend its main demands for a decent health and education system, for dignity, freedom, social justice, the right to work and against corruption. Young people showed remarkable resistance for three consecutive days, 27-29 September 2025, in the face of the repression and arrests that affected hundreds of people in different cities. The state is preparing to take many of them to court.

A stark contrast between two Moroccos


This movement has highlighted a stark contrast: on the one hand, the Morocco of “those at the top,” i.e. the ruling classes and their entourage, made up of the capitalist families known in our country. It is moving like a high-speed train to monopolize land, maritime, water and mineral wealth, and is getting rich thanks to colossal investments in so-called strategic projects, particularly those related to the preparation of the World Cup. And then the Morocco of those “at the bottom”: the popular classes who live in poverty, precariousness and unemployment, and who suffer from the deterioration of public services and rising prices. This is what young people expressed in the streets with their eloquent slogan: “We don’t want the World Cup, health first.”
The media blackout and the message of the ruling classes

These youth protests, and the brutal repression that accompanied them, were covered by numerous regional and international channels and platforms. But the official media and press completely ignored them. This shows the message of the ruling classes: the train of development of the “new Morocco”, hailed by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, continues to move forward, and it will not be stopped by the demonstrations of a few young people who want to destabilize the country and disturb the festive atmosphere of our successes.

It is not surprising that our leaders and their instruments, media and repressive, behave in this way. They are in the pay of this minority of local and foreign capitalists and will only concede to the people the minimum necessary to avoid a social explosion, in exchange for a systematic repression of fundamental freedoms, first and foremost freedom of expression and demonstration.

Union silence: a new betrayal

What draws attention is the silence of the leaders of the major trade union organizations in Morocco, such as the Union marocaine du travail (UMT) and the Confédération démocratique du travail (CDT), who have not even issued a statement condemning the repression that has affected young (and sometimes very young) people. On the contrary, the latest news published on the Facebook page of the UMT shows that the secretary general and members of the national bureau received a delegation from the International Monetary Fund at the union’s headquarters in Casablanca on 23 September 2025. The Moroccan people know well that this financial institution, like its twin the World Bank, oversees policies that advocate the reduction of social spending in the fields of health and education for the benefit of the private sector, the abolition of the compensation fund, pressure on wages by maintaining a derisory minimum, destruction of pension systems, extension of flexibility and undeclared work, in addition to restricting the right to strike through the application of the law on strikes and the maintenance of article 288 of the criminal code (which condemns “obstruction of the freedom to work”)

Instead of refusing to receive this criminal institution against the Moroccan people, which has been widely denounced by social movements (including at a world summit against its annual meetings in Marrakech in October 2023), the leadership of this union held a meeting with it, thus giving it legitimacy for its choices, the same choices that young people in the streets of our country are opposing today. We note that the National Union of Higher Education, affiliated to the UMT, in its announcement of a three-day national warning strike, from 30 September to 2 October 2025, against the draft framework law 59-24 on the organisation of higher education, made no reference to the youth movement (of which education is one of the central demands), nor to the repression to which it is subjected.

These leaders continue to follow their usual approach of neutralizing the working class in any popular movement, as they did in the 20 February movement in the Rif, Jerada and elsewhere. We still see them today concretely dissociating themselves from the youth movement, as if the degradation of public health and education services did not concern workers.

On the other hand, the National Education Union - Democratic Orientation (FNE), as well as its youth union, supported the demands of the youth movement and denounced its repression. But his call to hold a central demonstration in front of the headquarters of the Ministry of National Education in Rabat on 5 October 2025, in parallel with the march of the Moroccan Front in Support of Palestine and Against Normalization, did not make the connection between the struggle for education and the youth movement, nor did it raise the need to unite the struggles between the unions and the youth protesting in the streets.
Unite the struggles to paralyze the means of production

The youth movement insists on the need to unify all the workers’ bases in the unions and coordinations, whether in education, health or in the other public sectors, as well as in the private sector, in order to engage effectively and concretely alongside the new generation in the struggle for education. health and dignity, and against repression and tyranny.

There is only one way to defeat the strategy of the ruling classes and that of the complicit trade union leaders, which aims to distance the working class from the struggles of the youth in the streets, while they defend the same demands as the workers: to link the youth movement to the struggles of the working class, and to unite efforts to carry out a general strike that will paralyze the tool of production and wrest victories from the ruling classes.

30 September 2025

Translated by International Viewpoint from Inprecor.


Attached documentsagainst-state-repression-and-tu-leaderships-silence-youth_a9202.pdf (PDF - 909.7 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9202]

Morocco
In Figuig, women fight for a common good -water
Marrakesh: contributing to a political dynamic against imperialist institutions
Under the yoke of the IMF
Debt Abolition Activists Gear Up for Countersummit as World Bank and IMF Meet
World Bank/IMF meetings: Counter-summit of social movements Marrakech, 12-15 October 2023


Marwan  is an activist in Morocco.


International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.



Building an anti-liberal left in Portugal is difficult but necessary

Tuesday 7 October 2025, by Jorge Costa

Portugal is experiencing a significant shift to the right, particularly visible in the results of the last parliamentary elections. These difficulties are caused by the effects of the global crisis on the country. Jorge Costa has been a leader of the Portuguese Left Bloc ( Bloco de Esquerda ) since its formation in 1999, including as as a Member of Parliament in 2009-2011 and 2015-2019. He gives his analysis of this shift.

How do you analyse the results of the last elections?

The most important change that occurred on May 18 was the advance of the Chega party [1], which has become the second largest party in the country. with 60 MPs, two more than the Socialist Party. In the new parliamentary composition, none of the three largest parties (right: PSD+CDS, 31 per cent; far right: CH, 23 per cent, Socialist Party, 23 per cent) is in a position to form a majority by allying with smaller parties. The lifespan of the right-wing government will therefore depend on the support for the principal laws proposed – starting with the state budget – by the CH or the PS. No post-election agreement has been reached so far.

Unlike the situation before May, the possibility of parliamentary agreements with the CH is now openly admitted by the PSD. The parliamentary framework thus becomes very permeable to conflicts and social tensions, including those created around "perceptions" to instil hate speech on security and immigration.

On the other hand, for the first time, the MPs to the right of the Socialist Party represent more than two-thirds of the elected representatives the threshold necessary to amend the Constitution. This introduces a real risk of a regressive modification of the constitutional regime, a long-standing ambition of the right. The ultra-liberals of the Liberal Initiative (IL) (5 per cent) and the CH have already announced their support for this possible revision.

The Bloco de Esquerda (Left Bloc) achieved the worst electoral result in its history (2 per cent) and has only one MP left (the party coordinator, Mariana Mortágua), behind Livre (European Greens] (4 per cent) and the PCP (Communist Party, 3 per cent) . It should be remembered that between 2015 and 2022, the Bloco obtained 10 per cent of the votes and 19 MPs, becoming the largest party in a political field that totalled 20% of the votes: the Bloco , the PCP, Livre and the PAN (animalists). Today, all of these parties together only obtain half of the votes obtained at that time, and a third of the MPs.

What does the rise of the far right, which is the big news, reveal about the context and the history of Portugal?

The far-right’s result demonstrates its ability to retain the abstentionist vote it had obtained in 2024, and to increase it throughout the country, particularly in the most socially disadvantaged areas, in the provinces and in the former industrial belts. The CH becomes the leading party in the districts south of the Tagus (Setúbal, Portalegre, Beja, Faro – which were formerly strongholds of the PCP and the PS). The CH is in a position to seek government office. This new situation will result in a general deterioration in the conditions for exercising democracy, both in parliament – where the CH has been pursuing a strategy of exhausting the conditions for debate and expression for several years – and in society, with the trivialization of racist and fascist violence.

The centrality given to the political debate on the issue of immigration was a significant factor in the defeat of the left. Portugal has undergone one of the most profound transformations in its social composition and the profile of the working class. In just a few years, the number of foreign workers has increased tenfold and now represents approximately one-third of the workforce. A significant portion of this new working class does not come from Portuguese-speaking countries. The far-right’s narrative has been reinforced by the failure of reception and regularization services and by reduced investment in comprehensive responses to housing, public services, and language access. The government has used its own version of security-related and xenophobic rhetoric to justify the new anti-immigrant legislation , aided by the Socialist Party’s retreat on this issue. This narrative has been popularized by the sensationalism of certain media outlets and, above all, by the manipulation of the masses through social media. In fact, the far right has succeeded in making immigration the most widely accepted explanation for the difficulties in people’s lives.

Anti-racist and anti-fascist action, the creation of common and united spaces, and the expression of a programme of social transformation in working-class areas where authoritarianism and hate speech are now rooted continue to play a central role. It is crucial to find ways to open trade unions to foreign workers, to create mechanisms for inclusion, and to prevent the exploitation of differences in order to promote social resentment and division within the working class.

How do you see the future of discussions within the ruling class and the possibilities for the development of this extreme right?

Montenegro [2] sees in the current parliamentary relationship of forces the opportunity to relaunch, with the support of the CH and the IL, a counter-reform of labour law – left pending with the fall of the government of the troika in 2015. [3] – and thus remove the little protection that remains for workers and introduce restrictions on the right to strike and deregulation of working hours. This is a war against labour and the collective organization of workers .

After a first year of government interrupted by the elections, the right is making speeches and legislating to compete with CH on its own ground, that of xenophobia, and seems to want to deepen its radicalization to the right – in its discourse, in the government structure, in the composition of the government, in its programme (largely hidden by the AD during the electoral campaign: revision of labour laws and the right to strike, anticipation of the objective of defence spending, anti-immigrant legislation). To the point that the new leader of the PS, José Luís Carneiro, now puts in question an agreement on government with the PSD, initially proposed by the socialists.

In its hesitations, the Portuguese political centre is following the European model in its decomposition: liberal capitulation, worsening inequalities and social resentment, adherence to xenophobic and security-oriented common sense that confirms the theses of the extreme right. The parties to the left of the PS must recognize the historic change represented by the current position of the CH and prevent the political struggle from being reduced to the dialectic between ascendant neo-fascism and the liberal centre in crisis.
The result is difficult for the Bloco

. How do you analyse this decline, while the PS is declining less?

Between 2015 and 2022, the Bloco was the largest party in a political arena that totalled 20 per cent of the vote. Taking this diversity into account, it supported proposals and put forward alternatives for social progress and climate justice, with the potential to assert itself as an autonomous political field. Four years after the "geringonça" agreements [4], these parties maintained their 20 per cent vote share, benefiting from their ability to guarantee, between 2015 and 2019, political stability based on a (modest but real) redistribution of wealth: cancellation of budget cuts and taxes, increase in the minimum wage, transport tickets, school textbooks, end of health access fees. During this period, the PS carried out serious attacks on public services, but Passos Coelho’s liberal plan (starting with the privatization of social security) was blocked by the solidity of the left. A political and class revenge then remained to be accomplished.

When the international context (Covid, inflation, war) increased pressure on wages, housing, and public services (especially healthcare)—and despite some easing of pressure from the EU and the minority on the right—the PS refused any reform, preferring to call elections to relieve pressure from the parties to its left, on which it depended in parliament. Without coordinated action to reject stagnant budgets, parties to the left of the PS became more vulnerable to the hostile tactics of then-Prime Minister António Costa, who blamed them for the political crisis. They lost part of their representation in 2022, when the PS obtained a short-lived absolute majority, and again in 2024, after it imploded in a cloud of corruption.

In this new political context, the Bloco revised its electoral campaign model. We have not abandoned the programmatic battles that define the Bloc’s identity, such as public services, equality, the rejection of xenophobia, and opposition to militarism, but we have focused on a few salient issues: rent caps, workers ’ rights, and the wealth tax. This is also how we have avoided a sterile discussion on governability, highlighting measures that would change the lives of a significant portion of the population and that our parliamentary representation would defend under all circumstances. This policy has borne fruit: the issue of rent caps has occupied an important place in the political debate, forced all our opponents to speak out,. It has been reinforced by the increasingly alarming news about the housing crisis, and has been identified by a portion of the population as a valid response. It will remain one of the most important battles for the lives of our people. However, none of our proposals promoted an electoral revival.

Our campaign promoted decentralized, direct-contact initiatives, with door-to-door canvassing. We visited more than 20,000 homes and launched a form of political action that will be fundamental in the future. We did this in a variety of ways across the country, mobilizing young activists, recent members, and older ones, who were able to see that they could intervene directly and not as spectators of the electoral campaign. For the same reason, we replaced traditional gatherings with "coffee chats," open to dialogue with everyone, and with creative and lively parties and public sessions.

The Bloco will not stop fighting for what we defended in these elections: a popular housing policy, workers’ rights, the fight against inequality and for the quality and guarantee of public services, against fascist threats and for unity in the defence of democratic life and the constitutional rules that protect it.


Does this call into question the political orientation and usefulness of the Bloco? Or does it, on the contrary, confirm the need for such an organization in the political decline we are experiencing on a global scale?

In this new phase, convergence to the left of the Socialist Party is a sine qua non for achieving democratic victory against the radicalized right. Isolated, none of the left-wing forces will be sufficient to confront this rise of the right. All political forces, social and trade union activists in this political field are called upon to form a camp that serves as a transformative reference, in opposition to the right-wing governance supported by the centre, embodied by the Socialist Party.

This path of rapprochement and convergence is difficult, but it is the Bloco’s path. It must find an electoral expression and must build common spaces and social experience, without abandoning any flag – from union struggles to the student movement, from feminism to LGBTQI+ rights, from fraternity with immigrants to anti-militarism.

There are certainly strong differences in this area: Livre aligns itself with an uncritical Europeanism and has strong ambiguities on arms issues. On the PCP side, in addition to the misreadings resulting from unbridled "campism," there is a sectarianism that is strengthening as the party’s influence declines. The trade union movement is paying a high price, with the sectarian atrophy of the CGTP unions, already threatened by society’s rightward drift. However, there are recent experiences of truly united mobilizations that open up perspectives: in the suburbs of the capital, in the struggles for the right to housing, against racism, and in response to police violence and fascist gangs. In the heat of these struggles and in the opening of these spaces, solidarities must be forged that reveal the contours of a transformative alternative capable of confronting and overcoming the expressions of hatred that are being mobilized. The role of the Left Bloc is irreplaceable in all these debates and processes of struggle.

How do you see the social in Portugal this autumn?

As in many countries, public opinion is sensitive to the ongoing genocide in Gaza. The participation of Bloco MP Mariana Mortágua in the Gaza Flotilla initiative demonstrates our commitment to the Palestinian cause and echoes a sense of solidarity that is spreading throughout the country.

At the same time, at the union level, there will be an important debate on how to respond to the government’s employment package, which, in addition to reversing all the small gains made under the Socialist Party governments, also includes new attacks. The need for convergent action between the Communist and Socialist trade unions (CGTP and UGT, respectively) is the subject of an ongoing debate with a view to calling a general strike. At the same time, the government’s defeat before the Constitutional Court on key aspects of its anti-immigration law (for example, obstacles to family reunification) has given new impetus to immigrant movements for mobilizations in September, which must be linked to union struggles.

Electorally, the next challenge is the municipal elections of October 12, in which the far right aims to conquer several town halls, including some of the largest in the country (Sintra, near Lisbon, for example). The Communist Party will have great difficulty in retaining the few local governments it still controls, but it has refused any dialogue with other left-wing parties. The Bloco is running in the municipal elections in quite a few towns and cities, including as part of coalitions with Livre in more than twenty large municipalities. In Lisbon and Ponta Delgada (capital of the Azores region), the Bloco is participating in coalitions extended to the Socialist Party in order to defeat the right-wing mayors.

The presidential election will take place in January 2026. The president is a secondary figure in the constitutional regime, with limited intervention in the legislative process, although with the power to dissolve parliament. On both the right and the left, the scenario is one of political fragmentation, with each party seeking its own candidate, making the future outcome difficult to predict. It is likely that the former Bloco coordinator, Catarina Martins, will be the Bloco- backed candidate. [5]

3 September 2025


Attached documentsbuilding-an-anti-liberal-left-in-portugal-is-difficult-but_a9205.pdf (PDF - 928.2 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9205]

Footnotes


[1] The far-right Chega party (CH), which in Portuguese means "Enough," which did not exist in the 2015 elections, obtained 1.3 per cent of the vote in 2019, 7.2 per cent in 2022 and 18.1 per cent in 2024.


[2] Luis Montenegro , leader of the PSD, had been the head of the previous government since April 2024. Accused of favouring the Spinunviva company , which he founded and which is run by his wife, the opposition refused to vote confidence in the government. The President of Portugal then dissolved parliament and called early elections for May 2025. Following the relative victory of AD (Democratic Alliance), formed by the PSD and the CDS, Montenegro is once again tasked with forming a government.


[3] The troika was the name given to the government led by PSD leader Passos Coelho from 2011 to 2015, with the open support of the IMF and the European Central Bank


[4] The policy of critical and conditional support for the PS government from 2015 to 2019 in exchange for the PS accepting a series of progressive measures proposed by the radical left, became known as the “geringonça”, which can be translated as “contraption.”


[5] The Bloc will hold its next congress in November, where it will continue to discuss the situation, the results of the elections, and its orientation.

Portugal
The crossroads of the Portuguese left
Victory for right, neo-fascists in second place in Portuguese elections
Hard questions for Left Bloc after a terrible parliamentary election
“We want to be able to look further than the end of the month”
The Carnation Revolution of Portugal Today: The New Challenge from the Far-Right


Jorge Costa is a member of the full-time leadership of the Bloco de Esquerda and of the Executive Bureau of the Fourth International. He is co-author of The Owners of Portugal - One hundred years of economic power (1910-2010) and The Bourgeoisie – who they are, how they live and how they rule (2014) with Francisco Louçã and João Teixeira Lopes.

International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.