Monday, September 23, 2024

The Case for a Global Climate Assembly

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

Sep 23, 2024
LAURENCE TUBIANA and ANA TONI

Although most people care deeply about addressing the climate crisis, only a minority of respondents in recent surveys trust their governments to achieve a fair and just net-zero transition. One promising way to address this disconnect is through citizens’ assemblies, which should happen both nationally and globally.

NEW YORK – It has been nearly ten years since countries came together in Paris and agreed finally to get serious about averting a climate disaster. But while there is an emerging consensus on the structural economic reforms needed to transform sectors such as energy, transportation, and agriculture, the necessary investments are not being made fast enough

.
China’s Climate Balancing Act
ZONGYUAN ZOE LIU explains how decarbonization and climate security have been integrated into the government’s broader agenda.

Instead, our governance systems are struggling to muster an adequate response to what is an increasingly obvious and severe climate and ecological crisis. Although many governments have proposed robust climate measures, these often trigger a social backlash, because they are perceived as unjust and inequitable. Many see policies that pit the old against the young, the city against the country, or the Global North against the Global South. Such controversies are tailor-made for social media, where they ripen and then rot in a hothouse of misinformation, incendiary rhetoric, and polarization.

Although the argument for the necessity of major reform has been won, the argument for how to do it fairly has not. This challenge will become only more difficult the deeper we get into the net-zero transition. Most people care deeply about addressing the climate crisis: in a survey conducted across 18 G20 countries, 71% of respondents agreed that major action is needed immediately to reduce carbon emissions. But trust in government action is lacking, with only 39% believing that their own government will act effectively.

One way to address this gap is to allow citizens participation in the elaboration and implementation of climate policies and measures designed by governments. Instead of having climate policies imposed by technocrats from above, governments should embrace approaches that combine “top-down” with “bottom-up” methods, with the latter bringing together ordinary people who are tasked with shaping a shared vision of the future.

Successful examples of those participatory methods already exist. Citizens’ assemblies in France are decision-making bodies composed of randomly selected, demographically representative individuals who deliberate on a specific issue of public concern and provide policy recommendations.

In addition to fostering consensus on divisive topics, citizens’ assemblies educate the public about complex policy issues and give citizens a direct role in decisions that affect their lives. These elements are especially important for issues like the net-zero transition, which entails major economic changes that can leave communities feeling divided. Unlike politicians, assembly members make decisions free from electoral pressures and lobbying. Notable examples include Ireland’s assemblies on marriage equality and abortion, which led to national referenda and breakthrough legislation; and France’s climate assembly, which helped shape its most ambitious climate bill to date.

Brazil’s long standing participatory approach to policymaking has also proved successful. For example, its Climate Plan is being developed through a governance structure that includes several ministries of the federal government together with representatives from the scientific community, subnational governments, the private sector, and civil society.

Moreover, a climate participatory platform (involving both digital and in-person exchanges) has been launched to invite all Brazilian citizens to propose solutions. The National Environmental Conference and the National Social and Economic Development Council, by prioritizing the Climate Plan, have further contributed to strengthening this bottom-up process.

Such methods can steer climate policy proposals away from sources of polarization, and toward opportunities for collaboration and deliberation. Among G20 countries, 62% of people favor using citizens’ assemblies for decision-making, and that number has risen above 70% in countries like Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico, and South Africa, and to over 80% in Kenya. More than 170 citizens’ assemblies have been held in more than 30 countries, each with the goal of accelerating climate action in ways that support a fair and just transition for all.

Drawing on the model of the World Social Forum, what we need now is a Global Social-Climate Forum, or a Global Citizens’ Assembly for People and Planet, to bring citizens together from every country, not just to chart a collective path forward, but to reimagine our politics and encourage a global ethical stock-take. This would be an opportunity for humanity to come together, to understand each other’s aspirations and anxieties, and to co-create a green transition that benefits everyone. Rather than leaving anyone behind, we can forge a new social contract rooted in solidarity, equity, and fairness.

In 2015, France and Peru established a new mechanism, the Action Agenda, because they recognized that the scale of change needed to tackle the climate crisis requires more than just government action. It also depends on the wealth of ideas that civil society – including businesses, cities, and communities – has to offer.

As countries prepare to announce their next climate commitments in 2025, we must acknowledge the critical role that ordinary citizens have to play, both individually and collectively, in addressing the climate crisis. At COP30 and beyond, we must provide a dedicated space to hear every voice, and to ensure that the transition is not only fast but fair. Failing that, we will not achieve our common goals. That is why Brazil is committed to making COP30 (in November 2025) the People’s COP, and to giving every person on Earth the opportunity to participate in shaping our common future.


PS Events: Climate Week NYC 2024
Watch our Climate Week NYC 2024 event now to hear speakers from across the globe – including Mia Amor Mottley, Prime Minister of Barbados; Gabriel Boric, President of Chile; Jiwoh Abdulai, Minister of Environment and Climate Change of Sierra Leone; and Maisa Rojas Corradi, Minister of the Environment of Chile – discuss climate leadership, development finance, and more.

WATCH NOW



LAURENCE TUBIANA
Writing for PS since 2012
Laurence Tubiana, a former French ambassador to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, is CEO of the European Climate Foundation and a professor at Sciences Po, Paris.


ANA TONI
Writing for PS since 2021
Ana Toni is National Secretary for Climate Change at the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change of Brazil.

WWIII

EXPLAINED: Sabina Shoal, the newest flashpoint in the South China Sea

Manila needs to develop a clear, unified strategy in its South China Sea claim, analysts say.
Camille Elemia – Manila
2024.09.23



This frame grab released by the Philippine Coast Guard shows a China Coast Guard ship (left) colliding with BRP Teresa Magbanua near the Sabina Shoal, Aug. 31, 2024.
Philippine Coast Guard handout/AFP


Sabina Shoal, located over 75 nautical miles west of the Philippines and 600 miles from China, has become the latest flashpoint between the two rival claimants in the South China Sea.

A months-long standoff began in April when Manila sent one of its largest and most modern ships, BRP Teresa Magbanua, to the shoal amid reports that Beijing could be trying to reclaim land there.

In response, China accused the Philippines of planning to ground the ship there to occupy it.

In August, Manila accused a Beijing ship of ramming BRP Teresa Magbanua several times, the fifth case of alleged harassment by China of Philippine ships operating near the shoal that month. Chinese officials said the Philippine ship acted dangerously and rammed into a Chinese vessel.

See: 2024 Sabina shoal standoff: A timeline

On Sunday, the Philippine Coast Guard pulled BRP Teresa Magbuana from the shoal’s waters and sent it back to port after a five-month deployment, citing needed repairs and medical care for crew members. But Filipino officials said they had not surrendered Manila’s claim to the area.

What is Sabina Shoal and why is it important for the Philippines?

PH-CH-Sabina-explainer 2.jpg
This map highlights Mischief Reef, Second Thomas Shoal and Sabina Shoal in the disputed Spratly Islands region of the South China Sea. [AFP]

Sabina Shoal – which the Philippines calls Escoda Shoal and China refers to as Xianbin Jiao – serves as a rendezvous point for resupply missions to nearby Second Thomas Shoal, where the Philippines maintains a World War II-era ship to serve as a military outpost and territorial marker.

Analysts have said that if China takes control of Sabina Shoal, it could prevent the Philippines from conducting resupply missions to the Second Thomas Shoal or reaching the Manila-occupied Thitu island, home to about 400 Filipinos.

Part of a crucial maritime trade route for Manila, the reef is also “a good staging ground for vessels that [could] interfere with Philippine maritime activities extending from Palawan to the West Philippine Sea and the Kalayaan Islands,” said Jay Batongbacal, a Filipino maritime analyst and director of the Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea.

Manila calls territories and waters in the South China Sea within its 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ) the West Philippine Sea.

PH-CH-Sabina-explainer 3.jpg
This map shows occupied or administered islands in the disputed South China Sea. [AFP]

“A hostile China would be able to strangle our maritime trade with the rest of Asia and most of the world from Escoda Shoal,” Batongbacal told BenarNews, an RFA-affiliated online news organization, on Sept. 3.

The South China Sea is a critical world trade route accounting for 21% of global trade (U.S. $3.4 trillion) in 2016, the most recent year these data are available, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said in a report earlier this year.

Sabina Shoal is important to Manila because of its proximity to Reed Bank, another South China Sea feature that is a traditional fishing ground for Filipinos, and has a potential role in the country’s energy security because of its rich oil and gas deposits.

Territorial presence

Philippine officials said a new ship will be sent to the Sabina Shoal to replace the BRP Teresa Magbanua, which returned to port.

Two Philippine Navy sources told BenarNews that the country could not send a ship to the shoal anytime soon because of extreme weather conditions.

For its part, China could send dozens of ships to block Philippine ship if it is stationed at the shoal, according to the sources who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the issue.

Blocking a Philippine ship “en route to Sabina Shoal is a possible prospect,” especially since Chinese ships appear to be capable of tracking movements at sea, said Collin Koh, a maritime security analyst with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore.

Another scenario is that Beijing “might tolerate” Manila’s stance on putting a “strategic presence” in the shoal but it “would actively block the [Philippine] ship from entering the lagoon of the feature,” Koh said.


RELATED STORIES

Troubled Waters: The South China Sea

Philippines says it did not surrender Sabina Shoal to China

Philippines says 200-plus Chinese vessels have clustered in its EEZ


Unclear strategy

Some military officials, diplomats and analysts – a majority of whom did not want to be identified – have expressed concerns that the Philippines has no cohesive strategy on its South China Sea claim.

In March, the Philippine government created the National Maritime Council to have overall jurisdiction and “direction on policy-formation, implementation and coordination” on all issues affecting the country’s maritime security and domain awareness.

But the country also has the National Task Force on the West Philippine Sea, created in 2016 for similar objectives.

Under the latest order, the task force would be placed under the council. But confusion abounds as several officials are discussing Manila’s claim coming from different agencies including the Philippine Coast Guard, Armed Forces of the Philippines and National Security Council, which are members of the council and the task force.

Jonathan Malaya, assistant director general of the National Security Council and task force spokesman, said the task force is not mandated to provide overall strategy or policy.

“Here in the [task force], we’re more strategic and operational,” he told BenarNews.

Meanwhile, the Philippines needs to step up with its South China Sea strategy, analysts told BenarNews.

“At this point, it’s not clear if the government has a specific game plan to deal with Chinese actions in the West Philippine Sea,” said Rommel Jude Ong, a retired Navy rear admiral and a professor at the Ateneo de Manila University.

“From a naval standpoint, the entire West Philippine Sea is a single theater of operations. Our crisis response should always be looking at the big picture and not to disaggregate incidents in Sabina from whatever is happening elsewhere.

Another analyst expressed similar concerns.

“It is now wait and see for the Philippines in terms of its plans for Escoda Shoal,” said Julio Amador, a Manila-based analyst with the Amador Research Services, using the Philippine name for Sabina Shoal. “[China] has numbers on its side so the Philippine approach needs to be strategic and not tactical at this point.”

“Whatever path of action the Philippines will take, the whole government must be behind it and the plan should be approved at the highest levels.”

BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated online news organization.

Donald Trump win would hit German exports: institute

According to an analysis by a Munich-based economic institute, Donald Trump's tariff plans on exports from abroad could cost the German economy dearly. Analysts also predict a new trade war with China.


German exports to the US could fall by almost 15% if Republican candidate Donald Trump wins the US elections in November, the ifo economic institute in Munich warned in a joint scenario with Econpol Europe.

According to the institute, a Trump victory would hit German exports to the US, with the automotive and pharmaceutical industries to be the worst affected. The expected decline in both industries is as high as one-third.

German exports to China are also expected to experience a knock-on effect and could fall by almost 10%, according to the analysts.

Germany would suffer if US-China trade war reignites, expert says

This comes as Trump announced tariffs of 60% on US imports from China and 20% from the rest of the world, which would make German products considerably more expensive in the US.

"If Trump is elected again, and a new trade war starts with China, Germany as an exporting nation would suffer greatly as a result," ifo trade expert Lisandra Flach said.

The experts' calculation does not take potential countermeasures by China into account. Should such measures take effect, the impact on Germany could be even greater, the economists said.

The US election takes place on Tuesday, November 5.

Illegal  (UNDOCUMENTED)

Immigrants Aren’t the Same as Home Invaders


WHERE US LABOR AND FREE MARKETEERS AGREE

By James Pethokoukis

AEIdeas

September 23, 2024

For people enthused about the idea of deporting roughly 11 million illegal immigrants living in the United States, this seems to be their drop-the-mic argument: “If someone invaded your home, you would call the police to have them removed, right? Well, America is my home. Let the removal begin!”

This is a very bad argument. It’s even maybe a worse analogy than comparing the budget of a government to that of a household. (Among other differences with a family budget, governments can print money, tax citizens, borrow at lower rates, and have longer planning horizons.) And that’s saying something.

Where to begin? 

  • For starters, a country is a public entity, while a home is a private space meant for exclusive use of the owner. A country consists of public lands, shared infrastructure, and communal spaces that are meant to be used by all members of society. It’s fundamentally a place of interaction: culturally, economically, and politically. A country is governed by collective decision-making processes, such as democratic elections, while a home is under the sole authority of its owners.
  • There’s also a big difference in motivation: Most immigrants are seeking better lives, safety, or economic opportunities, not to commit crimes. Not to hurt you or take your stuff. Immigrants often contribute to the economy through labor and taxes, even if undocumented. A home invader doesn’t provide economic benefits to the homeowner. A home invader doesn’t sneak into your house, clean it from top to bottom, cut your grass, repair your roof, and then leave money on the kitchen table. Also: Immigrants typically aim to become part of the community long-term, while a home invasion is a brief, isolated incident.
  • Immigration law is complex, with various statuses and paths to legal residence. Trespassing laws are much simpler and don’t capture this legal complexity.
  • Finally, the country-home argument is often a bad-faith one since many immigration restrictionists want less immigration of all kinds, both unauthorized and authorized.

Rather than comparing illegal immigration to a home invader, maybe it’s more like a group of people sneaking into a large, understaffed amusement park with long entry lines. Like these nefarious park sneakers, most immigrants come to participate and seek opportunities, not to cause harm. They often contribute to the economy once inside, similar to buying food or souvenirs in the park. Importantly, unauthorized entrants don’t inherently make the park more dangerous (mirroring data on immigrant crime rates). Over time, these entrants may integrate, becoming indistinguishable from other park-goers. While imperfect—I think the statistics tell a pretty clear story—this comparison better captures the nuances of immigration far better than the simplistic and misleading home-invasion analogy.

Anyway, when thinking about immigration of all kinds, this Penn Wharton analysis makes for a good starting point:

Economists generally agree that the effects of immigration on the U.S. economy are broadly positive. Immigrants, whether high- or low-skilled, legal or illegal, are unlikely to replace native-born workers or reduce their wages over the long-term, though they may cause some short-term dislocations in labor markets. Indeed, the experience of the last few decades suggests that immigration may actually have significant long-term benefits for the native-born, pushing them into higher-paying occupations and raising the overall pace of innovation and productivity growth. Moreover, as baby boomers have begun moving into retirement in advanced economies around the world, immigration is helping to keep America comparatively young and reducing the burden of financing retirement benefits for a growing elderly population. While natives bear some upfront costs for the provision of public services to immigrants and their families, the evidence suggests a net positive return on the investment over the long term.

I would also recommend this Cato Institute piece, “The 14 Most Common Arguments against Immigration and Why They’re Wrong” and my essay/interview: “The new book ‘Streets of Gold’ shatters myths as it makes the case for a nation of immigrants.”

Albania to create world’s smallest sovereign state for Bektashi order

Albania to create world’s smallest sovereign state for Bektashi order
Prime Minister Edi Rama confirmed plans for Vatican-style state within Albania’s capital Tirana. / bne IntelliNews
By bne IntelliNews September 23, 2024

Albania is planning to create a sovereign microstate for the Bektashi Order, a Sufi Muslim sect, within its capital Tirana, Prime Minister Edi Rama confirmed in a speech to the UN General Assembly on September 22. 

The new state will be modelled on the Vatican City in Rome. The plan for the Bektashi microstate reflects Albania’s broader aim of promoting peaceful religious coexistence both at home and abroad.

The new state, which would occupy a 10-hectare parcel of land — about one-quarter of the size of Vatican City — would have its own administration, passports and borders, according to media reports. It will follow the religious practices of the Bektashi Order, a Shiite Sufi group founded in 13th-century Turkey. 

While specifics on the granting of sovereignty remain unclear, Bektashi leaders have expressed enthusiasm for the project. 

In his speech to the UNGA, Rama spoke of Albania’s historical role in fostering religious tolerance, citing examples from World War II and the recent Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, according to a transcript published by the government.

“While Albania may be a small country, it has given the world good examples, which has been taken to protect our common humanity,” Rama said, referencing Albania’s protection of Jewish refugees during the Holocaust. “The Jewish community grew 20-fold during the Holocaust thanks to Muslim and Christian families who protected them from the Nazis.”

Rama also pointed to Albania’s recent sheltering of Afghans following the Taliban's return to power, calling it an example of the country’s commitment to protecting the vulnerable: “After the devastation of the fall of Kabul to the Taliban three years ago, we sheltered several thousand Afghans who would otherwise have ended up in the ninth circle of Hell!”

The Bektashi Order has a long history within Albania, having gained prominence in the 15th century through its influence on the Janissary Corps, the elite soldiers of the Ottoman sultan. The order was later banned in Turkey during the secular reforms of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and many of its members relocated to Albania, where it has since thrived.

Nearly half of Albania’s population identifies as Muslim, but the country has significant Catholic and Orthodox Christian minorities.

The Bektashi Order accounts for about 10% of Albania’s Muslim population. It is known for its progressive values, including allowing alcohol consumption, permitting women to dress freely, and eschewing strict lifestyle rules.

The creation of the new microstate is seen as a continuation of Albania’s tradition of religious tolerance, which is central to its national identity.

“Albania … gave the world the youngest saint, Mother Teresa, whose life embodied love for humanity,” Rama said. “It reminded us that not all of us can do big things, but we can do small things with great love. This is the principle on which Albania stands… this is the source of our inspiration, to support the transformation of the center of the Bektashi World Order into a sovereign state within our capital, Tirana.”

The Bektashi leadership, led by Baba Mondi, the order's head, would oversee both religious and administrative functions of the state, with citizenship limited to senior religious figures. The order envisions the microstate as a spiritual and administrative hub, operating independently of the Albanian government.

 

Tanzania detains opposition leaders ahead of banned protests over alleged political abductions, killings

By bne IntelliNews September 23, 2024

Police in Tanzania have detained leading leaders of the main opposition Chadema party, and about a dozen others, ahead of a banned demonstration on Monday (September 23) called to protest alleged recent political abductions and killings.

Local media gave differing accounts of total the number of people detained and how many had since been released.

Chadema said on X (formerly Twitter) that those arrested include party chairman Freeman Mbobe and deputy chairman Tundu Lissu. Another deputy chairman, Tundu Lissu, posted separating that a convoy of police vehicles had surrounded his house and that he would be taken into custody.

Lissu returned home in January 2023 after over two years in exile, emboldened to do so because of President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s decision to lift a ban on political rallies widely viewed as meant to weaken the opposition.

Critics expressed concern that the recent detentions are a sign that the East African country could be returning to the repressive rule of the late president John Magufuli.

The police action comes less than three weeks after the Suluhu vowed an investigation into the brutal killing of Ali Mohamed Kibao, a senior member of Chadema, whose lifeless body, Mbowe told journalists on September 8, showed signs he had been “severely beaten”, and had “acid poured on his face”.

Suluhu expressed deep sorrow over the incident and assured that her government would not tolerate such brutality, promising that a proper investigation would be done to find the killers of Kibao.

However, last week she cautioned against demonstrations and any related action, noting that the administration would not tolerate anything that would endanger law and order.

Police later declared the planned protests illegal, but Chadema had vowed to defy the ban. Over the past few days, anti-riot police have been patrolling the streets of Dar es Salaam to deter demonstrations.

On Monday, police also took into custody three journalists covering the protests, according to their employers, Mwananchi Communications Ltd and East Africa TV

Suluhu, who came to power in March 2021, lifted a ban on political rallies widely viewed as meant to weaken the opposition put in place by Magufuli, who had been accused of muzzling the news media, cracking down on the opposition and enacting laws aimed at keeping the governing party in power.

Rights campaigners say Suluhu's government is targeting opponents ahead of local elections in December and a national vote in 2025, Tanzania's first presidential election since the death of Magufuli.

Tanzanian opposition leader Freeman Mbowe arrested during protest


14 individuals, opposition leader Freeman Mbowe, are in custody, police say

Lulu Angelo Sanga |23.09.2024 -  TRT/AA


DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania

Tanzania's main opposition leader Freeman Mbowe, was arrested by police in the Magomeni area of Dar es Salaam Monday.

The arrest came moments before a planned protest organized by the Chadema party to condemn a spate of abductions and killings allegedly targeting members of the opposition.

Mbowe arrived at the scene in a small vehicle and briefly spoke to journalists who had gathered to cover the protest before police intervened and arrested him.

Jumanne Muliro, a police commander, confirmed that 14 individuals, including Mbowe, are in police custody.

Muliro said the opposition leaders were arrested for defying a lawful police order to stop participating in the protest in Dar es Salaam.

An investigation is going on, he added.

Chadema had said on its social media that police had surrounded the homes of Mbowe and the party’s Vice Chairman Tundu Lissu.

Since the early hours of Monday, Dar es Salaam residents have witnessed heightened police presence, with armed officers patrolling several parts of the city, particularly around Magomeni Mataa, where the Chadema-led protest was scheduled to begin.

The protest stems from a Sept. 11 call by the Chadema party Chairman Mbowe, demanding justice for people who were allegedly abducted, tortured, or killed. They called for the resignation of Interior Minister Hamad Masauni and senior security officials.

The party also demanded the safe return of missing party members, including Deusdetith Soka, Dioniz Kipanya, Jacob Mlay, and Mr. Kombo—whether alive or deceased.

Tanzania's police force had previously banned the protest, citing security concerns. Despite the ban, Chadema had vowed to proceed with the demonstration.

The situation remains tense as the government and opposition face off over the rights to protest and political accountability.


California attorney general sues Exxon Mobil over plastics recycling deceptions

The filing caps a two-and-a-half-year investigation into the oil giant.


California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced he was suing ExxonMobil over its role promoting plastics as recyclable. | Rich Pedroncelli/AP


By Wes Venteicher
09/23/2024 

SACRAMENTO, California — California Attorney General Rob Bonta accused Exxon Mobil in a lawsuit filed today of misleading the public about the environmental consequences of plastic production for decades, his office said in a news release.

The first-of-its-kind civil suit targets the world’s largest producer of chemical compounds that go into making plastic. Bonta, a Democrat, is seeking damages that he alleged were a result of Exxon’s promotion of single-use plastics.

“Today’s lawsuit shows the fullest picture to date of Exxon Mobil’s decades-long deception, and we are asking the court to hold Exxon Mobil fully accountable,” Bonta said in a statement.

Exxon couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

The suit in San Francisco County Superior Court, which comes a year after Bonta sued Exxon and four other oil majors seeking compensation for climate change damages, reflects California’s increasingly aggressive effort to hold the industry accountable for climate harms as the state transitions from fossil fuels to renewables.

The lawsuit accuses Exxon Mobil of violating state nuisance, natural resources, water pollution, false advertising and unfair competition laws, according to the release. It seeks an injunction against “further pollution, impairment, and destruction, as well as to prevent Exxon Mobil from making any further false or misleading statements about plastics recycling and its plastics operations.”

Bonta, who’s mulling a run for California governor in 2026, announced he was investigating oil and petrochemical companies’ recycling claims in April 2022 and highlighted Exxon Mobil in particular at the time.

His office has laid out a history accusing the industry of promoting recycling to fend off curbs on its plastics production business going back to the 1970s, when companies circulated internal warnings about the feasibility of plastics recycling but promoted it to the public.

A campaign by the companies in the 1980s helped deter state legislatures and local governments from pursuing restrictions or bans on plastic, Bonta’s office has said.

Plastics production has instead grown to 300 million tons per year, while less than 9 percent of it is recycled, according to an Association of Plastic Recyclers analysis from 2022.

The suit says the misleading claims continue today with Exxon Mobil’s promotion of “advanced recycling” techniques that use heat to break down plastic waste. But very little of the plastic waste used in the process becomes recycled plastic, according to the news release, which calls it “a public relations stunt meant to encourage the public to keep purchasing single-use plastics.”

A polar bear was spotted on the shores of Iceland for the first time in 8 years. It was shot dead by police.

While the bears are a protected species in Iceland and it's forbidden to kill one at sea, they can be killed if they pose a threat to humans or livestock.




September 23, 2024 /

A rare polar bear that was spotted outside a cottage in a remote village in Iceland was shot by police after being considered a threat, authorities said Friday.

The bear was killed Thursday afternoon in the northwest of Iceland after police consulted the Environment Agency, which declined to have the animal relocated, Westfjords Police Chief Helgi Jensson told The Associated Press.

"It's not something we like to do," Jensson said. "In this case, as you can see in the picture, the bear was very close to a summer house. There was an old woman in there."

The owner, who was alone, was frightened and locked herself upstairs as the bear rummaged through her garbage, Jensson said. She contacted her daughter in Reykjavik, the nation's capital, by satellite link, and called for help.

"She stayed there," Jensson said, adding that other summer residents in the area had gone home. "She knew the danger."
This handout photo shows a polar bear that was shot by the police after being considered a threat to people nearby, authorities said, in Westfjords, Iceland, Thursday Sept. 19, 2024. INGVAR JAKOBSSON / AP

Polar bears are not native to Iceland but occasionally come ashore after traveling on ice floes from Greenland, according to Anna Sveinsdóttir, director of scientific collections at the Icelandic Institute of Natural History. Many icebergs have been spotted off the north coast in the last few weeks.

Although attacks by polar bears on humans are extremely rare, a study in Wildlife Society Bulletin in 2017 said the loss of sea ice from global warming has led more hungry bears to land, putting them in a greater chance of conflicts with humans and leading to a greater risk to both.

In 2021, scientists in Norway found polar bears were inbreeding as the species fights to survive. A study found that on the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, polar bear populations have seen a 10% loss in their genetic diversity from 1995 to 2016.

A 2020 study found that the melting sea ice is starving polar bears and that within the century, polar bears could be extinct. Declining genetic diversity increases the risk of extinction.

Of 73 documented attacks by polar bears from 1870 to 2014 in Canada, Greenland, Norway, Russia, and United States - which killed 20 people and injured 63 - 15 occurred in the final five years of that period.

More recently, a pair of polar bears attacked and killed a worker last month at a remote government radar site in the Canadian Arctic. In 2023, a polar bear emerged from a snow squall and killed a woman and her young son in in Wales, Alaska, just below the Arctic Circle.

The bear shot on Thursday was the first one seen in the country since 2016. Sightings are relatively rare with only 600 recorded in Iceland since the ninth century.

While the bears are a protected species in Iceland and it's forbidden to kill one at sea, they can be killed if they pose a threat to humans or livestock.

After two bears arrived in 2008, a debate over killing the threatened species led the environment minister to appoint a task force to study the issue, the institute said. The task force concluded that killing vagrant bears was the most appropriate response.

The group said the nonnative species posed a threat to people and animals, and the cost of returning them to Greenland, about 300 kilometers (180 miles) away, was exorbitant. It also found there was a healthy bear population in east Greenland where any bear was likely to have come from.

The young bear, which weighed between 150 and 200 kilograms (300 to 400 pounds), will be taken to the institute to study. Scientists took samples from the bear Friday.

They will be checking for parasites and infections and evaluating its physical condition, such as the health of its organs and percentage of body fat, Sveinsdóttir said. The pelt and skull may be preserved for the institute's collection.

A Coast Guard helicopter surveyed the area where the bear was found to look for others but didn't find any, police said.

After the shot bear was taken away, the woman who reported it decided to stay longer in the village, Jensson said.
Colombian rebel group Segunda Marquetalia imposes control in restive coca zone

Guerrillas from the FARC dissident group Segunda Marquetalia, currently engaged in complex peace negotiations with the Colombian government, have taken control of southwestern region of Nariño.


A veneer of calm has settled over Nariño, one of the most violent regions of Colombia, where armed groups until recently waged bloody battles for control of vast coca fields.

The guerrilla group Segunda Marquetalia has taken control of the southwestern region – roughly the size of Belgium – using financial backing from Mexican cartels to unify myriad armed outfits, analysts say.

"The change has been spectacular, the groups have united, the violence has reduced considerably," said Jerson David, the president of a local association of subsistence farmers who work in the coca fields.

"Here, people grow coca according to the rules of the Segunda Marquetalia," he added.

Nearby, workers carry sacks filled with vivid green coca leaves that will be crushed and mixed with gasoline and chemicals in a makeshift laboratory, making a paste that will later become cocaine.

Coca fields stretch as far as the eye can see around the town of Zavaleta. In 2022, the Nariño region grew some 40 percent of the total coca in Colombia – the world's main cocaine producer.

In the town's centre, packs of motorbikes roar down the main street, and men dripping in gold chains and with handguns at their sides stare suspiciously at strangers.

At the entrance to the town hangs an old banner: "Segunda Marquetalia wishes you a Merry Christmas."

'Cauldron of violence'

Until 2016, it was the Marxist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) guerrilla group that held a monopoly over the profitable region.

When the group signed a landmark peace agreement with the government that year, "there was a rush to occupy this space," explained Elizabeth Dickinson, an analyst for the International Crisis Group (ICG).

Narino became a "cauldron of violence and competition around drug trafficking."

Segunda Marquetalia was formed by the chief FARC peace negotiator, Luciano Marín -- alias Iván Marquez -- who launched a new rebellion in 2019.

Dickinson said one of the group's commanders had links with Mexican cartels who provided the capital to recruit forces from other regions.

"The Segunda Marquetalia, with that influx of money and fighters, swept through Narino with remarkable speed," in the last two years, she said.

The takeover also involved a bloody war with another FARC dissident group, the EMC (Central General Staff) in 2023.

Since then, Segunda Marquetalia has reigned supreme in this Pacific coastal region, where the Andes descend into the foothills of the Amazon, towards scorching savannah and seaside mangroves.

Nariño in 2023 accounted for 27.3 percent of all victims of conflict in Colombia, according to the Indepaz thinktank.

About 30 massacres have been committed there and 130 community leaders killed since 2016.


'Pact' with locals

In the baking afternoon heat in Zavaleta, coca workers and guerrillas, with beers in hand, flock to bars like "El Patron," bearing the image of the late narco kingpin Pablo Escobar.

The police and army are totally absent, entrenched behind sandbags at their bases dozens of kilometers away.

The guerrillas keep a close watch over coca production and development projects such as road building.

Like several of Colombia's armed groups, Segunda Marquetalia has been involved in stop-start peace negotiations with the government.

"Peace, and the abandonment of coca, requires a transformation of the land, that is to say road construction, electricity networks," the group's second-in-command and chief negotiator, Walter Mendoza, told AFP surrounded by gun-toting men.

The group says it works in the interest of local communities, but experts refer to coercive control of the population.

Local journalist Winston Viracacha described the relationship as a "pact" in which locals carry out projects for the benefit of both sides, in return for payment from the guerrillas who "ensure order and social control."

One reason for the respite from violence is that the armed group is no longer interested in taking on the government directly.

"What interests them is local control to facilitate illegal economic activity. Rather than fighting the army, they want to control the population," said Dickinson.

Segunda Marquetalia has enforced its authority in other towns too, such as coastal Tumaco with its mainly Afro-Colombian population and long history of extreme poverty and violence between armed groups.

Until 2023, "no foreigner could set foot" in Bajito, a neighborhood of Tumaco with a pretty beach where mutilated bodies used to turn up, said municipal councillor Duvan Mosquera Cortes.

Now, "tourists can come here in peace."

However, Dickinson warns that "the situation remains extremely fragile," as a rival armed group could try and edge out the Segunda Marquetalia at any time.

by Hervé Bar, AFP
California profs stand up against crackdown on pro-Palestine protests


By Al Mayadeen
Source: The Intercept
21 Sep 2024 21:05


For the first time in over 30 years, the Council of UC Faculty Associations has submitted a formal complaint against the University of California system.



UCLA workers, students, and supporters get lunch after a rally at Royce Quad in the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA campus, on Tuesday, May 28, 2024. (AP)

In a recent report, The Intercept highlighted how faculty from seven University of California campuses came together to file a joint unfair labor practice charge against their employer.

Faculty from seven University of California campuses united, on Thursday, against the repression of protests over the Israeli war on Gaza by filing a joint unfair labor practice charge against their employer.

The professors, representing the prestigious California public university system, stressed that their institutions targeted them for expressing their views on Israeli aggression and for participating in pro-Palestine demonstrations alongside students earlier this spring.

The 581-page labor violation charge, submitted to California’s Public Employment Relations Board, primarily addresses the universities’ responses to the student-led Palestine solidarity protests. In May and June, university officials reportedly called on police to arrest hundreds of students, faculty, and staff involved in the protests.

Reports indicated that police used batons to beat demonstrators, fired rubber bullets and pepper balls, and deployed chemical agents. Following this crackdown, faculty and staff faced various repercussions, including suspensions and firings.

“UC’s actions to suppress speech about Palestine on our campuses, which represents an illegal content-based restriction of faculty rights, sets an alarming precedent,” stated Constance Penley, president of the Council of UC Faculty Associations.

She emphasized that their unfair labor practice filing demands a change in course, urging the university to follow the law and address the harm done to affected faculty.

Anna Markowitz, a member of the UCLA faculty association, remarked that the university’s crackdown aimed to “end Palestine solidarity activism on campus.”

She added, “In this ULP charge, we are saying that this illegal suppression of speech cannot stand, whether about Palestine or about other issues that students and faculty may raise in the future.”

An unfair labor practice charge submitted to the Public Employment Relations Board is a formal allegation of legal violations, prompting an investigation that can lead to a dismissal or a settlement conference. If no agreement is reached, the case is brought before an administrative labor law judge.

The UC system denied the allegations on Thursday, stating that the faculty groups lack standing to file a complaint with the Public Employment Relations Board.

The university claimed it "has allowed — and continues to allow — lawful protesting activities surrounding the conflict in the Middle East. But when protests violate University policy or threaten the safety and security of others, the University has taken lawful action to end impermissible and unlawful behavior.”

Penley, Markowitz, and representatives from the seven campuses—including Los Angeles, Irvine, San Diego, Santa Cruz, Berkeley, Davis, and San Francisco—held a press conference outside a UC regents meeting at UCLA to announce the charges.

Nearby, pro-Palestine students staged a protest against a recent request by UC police for new drones, robots, pepper balls, projectile launchers, and sponge bullets, similar to the weapons used against student and faculty protesters in the spring.
Dive deeper

Thursday’s filing marked just the second time the Council of UC Faculty Associations has submitted a joint charge since its establishment in the early 1970s. The last similar charge was filed in 1993 when faculty protested against the denial of merit raises.

Related News


“This Unfair Labor Practice charge is historic, in that it’s the first time that all the chapters have come together to do a charge around violations of workplace conditions, which involves all the violations of academic freedom, free speech, [and] freedom of assembly,” stated Constance Penley.

The faculty associations’ charge builds on separate complaints submitted by UC employees represented by the United Auto Workers, the University Council-American Federation of Teachers, and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.

Months before the UC encampments emerged last year, following Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, the universities threatened lecturers with disciplinary action for allegedly violating the school’s policy against the "misuse of the classroom," citing “political indoctrination” as an example. Shortly after, two UCSD lecturers were investigated for potentially breaching this policy by discussing Palestine in their classes.

Another UCSD professor faced scrutiny for supporting graduate students advocating for the needs of Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim students. This professor had emailed administrators to share the graduate students’ concerns and expressed disappointment that the department had not addressed the "genocide in Gaza." In response, UCSD initiated a hostile work environment investigation against the professor.

In Irvine, UCI officials warned a professor of potential disciplinary action for teaching about "Israel" and Palestine in class and altering their syllabus. Administrators indicated that this alleged violation would be kept in a confidential file and that any similar conduct would lead to a formal investigation.

Earlier this year in April at UCSF, a medical school lecturer was banned after discussing health issues faced by Palestinians at a health equity conference. During her 50-minute presentation, she dedicated only six minutes to trauma-informed care for Palestinians amid the ongoing Israeli war on Gaza, while also denouncing "antisemitism".

Despite this, the following month, administrators deemed her speech “biased and antisemitic,” prohibiting her from lecturing at the department that hosted the event. Although the ban was eventually lifted, the recording of her talk was removed from the school’s website.
UC faculty file labor charge over bias against Palestine protests

The labor charge stressed that UC officials have shown bias in favor of "Israel" and its policies. It highlights the university's longstanding opposition to the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which advocates for academic and economic boycotts of entities with ties to "Israel" to support Palestinian statehood. This movement has gained significant support among the university's student governments and many faculty members.

The charge cites California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, a member of the UC Board of Regents, who stated during a speech to the pro-"Israel" group Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California, “[W]e have to fight back and educate our students (so they) understand the very importance morally and from a national security standpoint of the existence, celebration, and empowerment of Israel.”

She also expressed concern that students were caught in a “wave of misinformation” and emphasized the need for the UCs to determine how to “go about taking control of our campuses.”

Since the arrests last spring at UCLA, UCSD, UC Irvine, and UC Santa Cruz, the university system has suspended faculty members, denied tenure to some, and fired a lecturer at UCLA. Disciplinary actions are still pending against professors at various campuses, including UCLA.

Thursday’s labor charge seeks to secure back pay and other compensation for faculty and staff who were arrested or suspended during the protests, as well as the reinstatement of UCSF violence prevention advocate Denise Caramagno, who was terminated in August after expressing support for the aforementioned lecturer.

Faculty also aim to negotiate protections against further retaliation and advocate for changes to the university’s new policies, which limit students' ability to protest this academic year.

These restrictions include a ban on encampments, face coverings, and the establishment of so-called free speech zones that significantly reduce where students can demonstrate.

The charge also points to alleged efforts by the UC system to prevent faculty from discussing union activities, including a strike by academic employees represented by UAW Local 4811, who walked out in May in support of the student protests. These restrictions are said to violate the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, which safeguards employees from retaliation for advocating workplace changes.

Additionally, it claims that the UC system failed to protect students in May when UCLA campus officers stood by as a group of Zionist counter-protesters attacked students at a pro-Palestine encampment, using chemical agents and launching fireworks at them.

“Every Californian should be worried about this threat to the stature of the University of California,” Penley stated. “You can look to Florida and Texas to see what happens when a state university system surrenders on protecting tenure, academic freedom, and free expression. The ramifications go far beyond those targeted.”

Among the restrictive actions implemented by UC was the establishment of “free speech zones,” which confine protests to small, non-contiguous areas of the campuses. The enforcement of these policies remains unclear. On Thursday, a student protest outside UCLA’s Luskin Conference Center, attended by several dozen masked individuals, occurred outside the designated zones. Student organizers reported that the university’s student affairs office had contacted them but did not mention these restrictions.

The group entered the regents meeting and temporarily disrupted the session with chants of “Free Palestine!” and “Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest.” Reports indicate that the protest continued until officers in riot gear arrived and issued a dispersal warning, prompting the students to leave.