Sunday, August 24, 2025

UK Miners from 1980s strikes return to picket line … at mining museum

Hannah Al-Othman North of England correspondent
THE GUARDIAN
Fri 22 August 2025 


Retired miner Russ Kear, 60, one of the tour guides on strike, said he and his father walked out of the pits in the 1980s.Photograph: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian

“Who’d have thought we’d be doing this again?” Arthur Scargill said earlier this week, raising a laugh from the ex-miners standing in the picket line outside the National Coal Mining Museum.

Staff at the Wakefield museum, many of them former coalminers, have walked out in a dispute over pay, and were joined on Thursday by the now 87-year-old former leader of the National Union of Mineworkers.

Alongside him was Russ Kear, 60, who has worked as a guide at the museum since the UK’s last coalmine, Kellingley colliery, in North Yorkshire, closed in 2015. He began working as a miner at the age of 16, at Sharlston colliery, near Wakefield, before moving to Selby coalfield, and later, Kellingley.

He said many of the museum’s staff, particularly those who have gone on strike, are former miners.

“I’d say 99% of us, I suppose you could call us veterans of the ‘84-’85 [strike],” he said. “I’m one of the youngest, believe it or not, up at the Mining Museum.”

In the 1980s, Kear was living at home with his parents – his mother did not do paid work, and he walked out of the pits alongside his father, Fred, a fellow miner.

“It was horrible,” he said. “The Tory government managed to get some laws in very quickly that stopped my mum claiming any benefits, so there wasn’t a penny coming into our house.


“But everybody got together, the community got together. Soup kitchens were opened up, we could get one meal a day. Up at the miners’ welfare club, we could go up once a week and you got a carrier bag full of shopping.

“It really was horrible,” he added. “It really brought the community together, people helped each other out, but when they started shutting the mines, that destroyed communities.

“You’d have thought that was a strike to end all strikes, wouldn’t you?” he said. “Like the big war should have been the war to end all wars. But it hasn’t worked out that way.”

This strike is very different. “The last time, you’re up against the government that had big, deep pockets, and no matter what happened, you weren’t going to win,” he said.

This time, he hoped, the industrial action may be successful. “When we do want to retire, if [the job] isn’t a decent income, how’re they going to attract somebody else to do what we’re doing?” he asked.

About 40 members of the Unison union are in dispute with the museum’s management over pay. They say the existing offer – of a rise of 5% or 80p an hour, whichever is greater, for all workers – is less than the previous deal proposed by the union and which they believed would be accepted by management. But the museum said it was an “increased offer” on previous pay proposals and “equates to a 6% pay rise for many”.

The strike, which is due to last until 14 September, with further action planned if an agreement is not reached, has caused underground tours to be suspended, but the rest of the museum remains open.


“Workers only choose to strike as a last resort,” the Unison general secretary, Christina McAnea, said. “It’s unsurprising museum staff have reached that point when their employer has come back with an even worse pay offer.

“Managers should do the right thing and pay staff fairly so the public can continue to learn about this important part of the nation’s industrial heritage.”

“I don’t want to [strike], it’s not what I go there for,” Kear said. “I’m 60 years old, so I’m at the twilight of my working career. I don’t want to be doing this.

“This is a place where I really do like to go and share my heritage and my history, and I just don’t want to be doing it [striking].”

A spokesperson for the museum said the pay offer was higher than pay settlements in the public sector, including the police, schools and other museums.

“This increased offer was rejected by Unison,” they said. “The union refused to share our revised offer with their members to see if they wished to accept it.

“As a charitable organisation, the museum, which relies on external funding and donations, continues to face considerable financial pressures.”

The spokesperson said they hoped “Unison will reconsider their position”, adding that they “remain committed to working closely with union representatives in the hope of a resolution”.
Rachel Reeves is under pressure to balance the books. This chart shows the scale of UK debt

Tola Onanuga 
Homepage editor
YAHOO FINANCE
Sat 23 August 2025

UK chancellor Rachel Reeves remains under intense pressure to tackle mounting government debt.

The UK think-tank National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) had previously forecast that Reeves was on course to miss her borrowing targets by £41.2bn.

The think-tank also posed a solution: Reeves should raise taxes immediately. It recommended "a moderate but sustained increase", including reform of the council tax system to make up the shortfall.

Getting debt on a downward path has been flagged as a priority for the government. In July, Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, said: “We are committed to tough fiscal rules, so we do not borrow for day-to-day spending and get debt down as a share of our economy."

Read more:  UK taxpayers ‘subsidising’ S&P 500, says LSEG boss

The recent sharp selloff in government bonds – known as gilts in the UK – has pushed yields higher, further adding to the debt pile.

One bright spot for Reeves, however, is that government borrowing came in lower than expected in July, offering some relief to the chancellor ahead of the autumn budget.

Public sector net borrowing fell to £1.1bn in July, figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), published on Thursday showed. This was lower than the £2.1bn forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) and a consensus forecast of £2.6bn.

More sustained action will be needed to truly tackle the debt pile though. And that's true for many other countries too, particularly in the wake of US president Donald Trump's tariff threats. Data compiled by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) showed the debt-to-GDP ratio – a signifier that the country will face difficulties servicing its debt – of the UK and other leading economies. The UK's ratio stands at 104%, according to the data.

Japan tops the IMF's list by a long margin, with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 235% – more than double that of the UK. Japan has traditionally relied on longer-dated bond yields to navigate its huge debt. However, buyers have recently begun to turn their backs on the Japanese bond market, sparking concern for the country's long-term financial outlook.

Read more: Lower-than-expected UK borrowing offers relief to Reeves as budget looms

Meanwhile, the US has the second-highest debt-to-GDP ratio of the listed countries, with a total of 123%. Worries about the country's mounting debt have been growing throughout 2025. Trump's tax-cut bill, which was signed into law in July, has heightened these concerns.

This chart uses the IMF's data to compare the debt-to-GDP ratio of selected leading economies, revealing stark differences and approaches to public finances.

I had electric shock treatment in the 1960s. Now I want to know why

Annalisa Barbieri
Sat 23 August 2025 
THE GUARDIAN


Illustration: Alex Mellon/The Guardian


I am 83, and my life seems to have been mostly happy. But after a year at art college, I sort of disintegrated and was sent to a mental hospital after I had tried to kill myself several times. My best explanation is that life was too difficult and painful. But why?

In the hospital I had 15 electric shock treatments. After the first one I didn’t recognise my mum. I had a blinding headache, and the fear of never waking up was strong. I was given antipsychotic drugs and sedatives. I caused a lot of worry to my parents, but I couldn’t “pull myself together”. Looking back, I see myself as a caring person who helped the confused and unhappy ladies who were locked away in that massive old mental hospital, where, in a way, I felt at home.

Afterwards, I decided to go to Italy, where I recovered gradually and stopped the medication. I started teaching English and enjoyed it.

Since then, I have lived a full and in many ways successful life. But the question is, what happened to me?

People make seemingly random decisions all the time, but when we look back they had more purpose than they seemed to and were often informed by our environment. You were courageous, and still are for writing to me and thinking about this difficult time in your life, which must have been traumatic. And like all trauma, it’s stuck in your memory as snapshots, which you are now trying to make sense of.

Trauma memories aren’t laid down like regular memories in the brain. You can learn more about this by listening to the podcast I did on this subject with Dr Joanne Stubley, a consultant medical psychotherapist who leads the trauma service for adults at the Tavistock and Portman NHS trust in England. I showed her your letter and we were both curious about what led up to your breakdown. Mental health issues were not always dealt with well in the early 1960s, and the landscape back then was, as Stubley describes it: “power-based and misogynistic”. Things aren’t perfect now, but there’s certainly more understanding.

We also wondered what was happening around that time for you? What led to life being so difficult? Young people don’t have breakdowns and attempt suicide in a vacuum.


Even in the psychiatric hospital you were looking after others. No wonder you’re now thinking, ‘What about me?’

“You showed great resilience moving to Italy,” said Stubley. “You had the capacity to get yourself up and away [from a place where difficult things happened] to live a life where you were giving to others, teaching English.”

Even in the psychiatric hospital, you said you were looking after others. No wonder you’re thinking, “What about me? Who was thinking of me?” It’s not unusual to have these questions as we age and realise we have more years behind us than ahead. “You seem to have great courage and capacity to ask yourself these questions,” said Stubley. “That sense you have of, ‘What happened to me? What really went on here?’ is impressive.”

One of the hallmarks of trauma is feeling alone in a situation, of being disempowered. A way to process it is to understand what happened. I wondered if you might try to find out if any of your medical notes from this time still exist.

Stubley also suggested “starting to have conversations. It doesn’t have to be formal therapy. It could be with a good friend, a counsellor, anyone who would be able to offer you the space to explore and tell your life story so you may get more of an understanding of it. Are there any relatives alive from that time who you could talk to?”

I thought it was interesting you made a geographical move, and to a place where English isn’t routinely spoken. You really left your old self behind, but now it’s time to integrate the two. You might also find this Guardian article interesting.

• Every week, Annalisa Barbieri addresses a personal problem sent in by a reader. If you would like advice from Annalisa, please send your problem to ask.annalisa@theguardian.com. Annalisa regrets she cannot enter into personal correspondence. Submissions are subject to our terms and conditions. The latest series of Annalisa’s podcast is available here.



UK's Farage sets out plan for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers

THAT VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL LAW


David Milliken
Sat 23 August 2025 

FILE PHOTO: Britain's Reform UK Party press conference in London

LONDON (Reuters) -Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage set out plans on Saturday for "mass deportations" of migrants who have crossed the English Channel on small boats if his Reform UK party forms Britain's next government.

In an interview with Saturday's edition of The Times newspaper, Farage said he would withdraw Britain from the European Convention on Human Rights and sign deals with Afghanistan, Eritrea and other top countries of origin to repatriate illegal migrants

"We can be nice to people, we can be nice to other countries, or we can be very tough to other countries ... I mean (U.S. President Donald) Trump has proved this point quite comprehensively," Farage said.

Asked if he was concerned that asylum seekers would be killed or tortured if they were sent to countries with poor human rights records, Farage said he was more worried about the threat he believed asylum seekers posed to Britons.

"I can't be responsible for despotic regimes all over the world. But I can be responsible for the safety of women and girls on our streets," he said.

Britain has seen regular small-scale protests in recent weeks outside hotels housing asylum seekers, spurred in part by concerns about public safety after some migrants were charged with sexual assault.

Broader opinion polls show that immigration and asylum are the public's greatest concern, just ahead of the economy, and Reform UK - which won five seats at last year's general election - has topped recent voting intention polls.

Last year 37,000 people - mostly from Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Vietnam and Eritrea - arrived in Britain from France by crossing the English Channel in small boats. The total was up by a quarter from 2023 and accounted for 9% of net migration.

About two-thirds of people who arrive via small boats and claim asylum are successful and only 3% have been deported, according to figures analysed by the University of Oxford.

Farage told The Times he would end the right to claim asylum or to challenge deportation for those who arrived by small boats by replacing existing human rights legislation and opting Britain out of refugee treaties, citing a national emergency.

"The aim of this legislation is mass deportations," Farage said, adding that a "massive crisis" caused by asylum seekers was fuelling public anger.

The Times said Farage wanted to create holding facilities for 24,000 migrants on air bases at a cost of 2.5 billion pounds ($3.4 billion) and operate five deportation flights a day with total deportations reaching the hundreds of thousands.

If that failed, asylum seekers could be held on Ascension Island, a British territory in the South Atlantic, to send a symbolic message, Farage said.

($1 = 0.7395 pounds)

(Reporting by David Milliken; Editing by Aidan Lewis)



Billionaire behind Paramount mega-deal obtaining Israeli residency

JERUSALEM POST STAFF
Wed, August 20, 2025 


Billionaire Brandon Korff with former IDF Spokesperson Daniel Hagari.
 (photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON

Korff’s connection to Israel spans several years, marked by his substantial charitable donations to various Israeli causes, including the IDF, medical institutions, and local community projects.

Brandon Korff, a Jewish-American billionaire renowned for orchestrating one of the media industry's landmark deals, the $35 billion sale of Paramount, is in the process of securing Israeli residency.

A senior government official confirmed that Korff recently filed his application for Israeli residency, framing his decision as a gesture of solidarity in the face of global boycotts and rising hostility


In 2025, Korff significantly increased his time spent in Israel, becoming a more visible figure within the country. “This is a meaningful and encouraging step for Israel,” the official remarked. “At a time when Israel’s global standing is under scrutiny, such a powerful media figure is a welcome presence.”

Korff’s connection to Israel spans several years, marked by his substantial charitable donations to various Israeli causes, including the IDF, medical institutions, and local community projects.

His philanthropic support has noticeably grown in tandem with his longer stays in the country. Additionally, his brother served as a lone soldier in an elite IDF unit.
Invigorating Paramount's legacy


Korff is the grandson of the late Sumner Redstone, the influential media mogul behind Paramount, which, under his leadership, grew into a global powerhouse.


In addition to owning major networks like CBS and MTV, Paramount held the rights to some of the most iconic entertainment properties, including Star Trek and Mission: Impossible. The company’s recent sale at a valuation of $35 billion marked a historic shift.

Korff’s move to obtain Israeli residency is viewed by political officials as a step that could help build stronger connections between Israel and one of the most prominent families in global media, and as a clear vote of confidence in the country at a particularly sensitive time.


Marjorie Taylor Greene (R) joins Bernie Sanders in urging US to end Gaza famine

Edward Helmore
Sat 23 August 2025 
THE GUARDIAN


‘Does Hamas deserve it? Yes,’ Greene wrote on social media. ‘Do innocent people and children deserve it? No.’
Photograph: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images

Amid mostly silence in Congress, some US lawmakers on opposite sides of the political spectrum spoke out Saturday over a UN-backed report warning of famine in parts of Gaza.

“Let’s be clear: President Trump has the power to end the starvation of the Palestinian people,” Vermont’s politically independent senator Bernie Sanders posted on X. “Instead he is doing nothing while watching this famine unfold. Enough is enough. No more American taxpayer dollars to Nethanyahu’s [sic] war machine.”

Sanders, who also pushed resolutions to ban selling US weapons to Israel, has long been consistent about his concern regarding the humanitarian crisis in Gaza amid the war.

Marjorie Taylor Greene, the outspoken, far-right Georgia Republican, also called for greater compassion for Palestinians in a social media post Saturday, a day after UN secretary general António Gutteres described the famine in the territory as a “failure of humanity”.

The US representative, in a departure from the majority of her peers in Congress, described the Gaza humanitarian crisis as a genocide last month. In a long post on X, she then said that while Israel’s war against Hamas was justified, the suffering of civilians was not.

“Does Hamas deserve it? Yes,” Greene wrote, in part. “Do innocent people and children deserve it? No.”

“The innocent people in Gaza did not kill and kidnap the innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th,” she continued. “Just as we spoke out and had compassion for the victims and families of Oct7, how can Americans not speak out and have compassion for the masses of innocent people and children in Gaza?”

Greene linked the entirety of US financial and military aid to Israel to the conflict, arguing that it “means every U.S. tax payer is contributing to Israel’s military actions”.

“I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to pay for genocide in a foreign country against a foreign people for a foreign war that I had nothing to do with,” Greene concluded. “And I will not be silent about it.”

The post received an almost immediate response from far-right influencer Laura Loomer, who reportedly petitioned the White House to suspend the entry of injured Palestinian children from Gaza to the US.

Greene and Loomer, both claiming the mantle of Maga authenticity, have bitterly clashed on the issue, with Loomer falsely describing Palestinian children as a “national security threat” and “Islamic invaders”.

Loomer, who is Jewish, once claimed that her ban from social media platforms for anti-Muslim hate speech was antisemitic, while Greene infamously shared an antisemitic conspiracy theory that wildfires in California might have been started by Jewish space lasers.

On Saturday, Loomer hit out at Greene, falsely accusing her of calling for Palestinians from Gaza to be resettled in the US and asking: “Why are you advocating for GAZANS to come to the US? How is Islamic immigration ‘America First’?”

The UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) said last week that parts of Gaza are experiencing a “man-made” famine in the Gaza governorate, which includes Gaza City, site of a new Israeli offensive.

“As this Famine is entirely man-made, it can be halted and reversed,” the report said. “The time for debate and hesitation has passed, starvation is present and is rapidly spreading. There should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that an immediate, at-scale response is needed.”

The Israeli agency heading aid distribution in Gaza, the Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), rejected the report, saying it “relies on partial, biased data and superficial information originating from Hamas”.

On Saturday, Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, said on X that “the [international] media is missing the real story of ‘famine’ in Gaza. Hostages ARE starving, Hamas is getting fat, & the UN declares famine while 92% of THEIR food is stolen to be sold by Hamas. Meanwhile UN food sits rotting in sun. The UN should declare itself corrupt & incompetent.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene issues passionate plea in support of Gaza, setting off MAGA — including Laura Loomer

Kelly Rissman
Sun 24 August 2025 
THE INDEPENDENT


Georgia GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene calls for ‘compassion’ for Gaza and for the U.S. to stop funding a ‘genocide’ (AP)

Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has issued a passionate appeal urging Americans to support Gaza, enraging her usual MAGA allies.

The far-right congresswoman has repeatedly denounced Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza in the wake of Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023. Last month, she labeled the war a “genocide,” breaking with her Republican colleagues in Congress.

The Republican Congresswoman wrote a lengthy post on X on Saturday asking how Americans would feel if the United States was “bombed day and night because of something horrific our government did,” killing and injuring adults and children, while the rest of the world didn’t come to its aid.

“This is what is happening to Gaza where in spite of what we have all been told, many innocent people and children are being killed and they are not Hamas,” Greene wrote Saturday morning.

“Does Hamas deserve it? Yes. Do innocent people and children deserve it? No,” she continued. “The innocent people in Gaza did not kill and kidnap the innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th.”

“Just as we spoke out and had compassion for the victims and families of [October 7], how can Americans not speak out and have compassion for the masses of innocent people and children in Gaza?” the GOP firebrand wrote. “Is one type of innocent life worthy and another type of innocent life worth nothing?”

The United States has sent nearly $18 billion in military assistance to Israel since October 7. More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of the war, Gaza’s Health Ministry reported last month.

“I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to pay for genocide in a foreign country against a foreign people for a foreign war that I had nothing to do with,” Greene concluded. “And I will not be silent about it.”

Just 15 minutes after Greene posted her post on X, far-right activist Laura Loomer commented: “Why are you advocating for GAZANS to come to the US? How is Islamic immigration ‘America First’?”

Last week, Loomer celebrated the State Department’s decision to halt visitor visas for people from Gaza — including temporary visas for privately funded medical care — after she posted a series of videos of flights carrying people from Gaza to the United States and demanded that whoever approved their visas be fired.

The videos, showing children arriving in the country for medical treatment, were posted from HEAL Palestine, a nonprofit that delivers urgent and long-term support to Palestinian children and families. Visitor visas are nonimmigrant visas that allow people to enter the country temporarily, including for medical treatment, according to the State Department.

Other X users seemed to agree with Loomer.

“You have lost my support,” one person responded to Greene. Another called her “an idiot.”

More than half a million people in Gaza are trapped by famine, according to a recent analysis from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a group of international organizations on which the United Nations and aid agencies rely to monitor global hunger crises.



Laura Loomer, who last week celebrated the State Department’s decision to stop visitor visas for people from Gaza, criticized Greene’s take (Getty Images)

Last month, Greene slammed Florida Republican Rep. Randy Fine, who is Jewish and one of the most outspoken supporters of Israel in Congress, after he repeatedly suggested that Palestinians in Gaza should be starved. He has previously suggested Gaza should be "nuked” and “must be destroyed” while labelling a fellow member of Congress a “Muslim terrorist.”

“Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,” he wrote.

Of the starvation in Gaza, Fine said: “This is all a lie anyway.”

“I can only imagine how Florida’s 6th district feels now that their Representative, that they were told to vote for, openly calls for starving innocent people and children,” Greene posted in response.

“It’s the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,” she added. “But a Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful.”

Loomer again responded to Greene, writing: “There is no genocide in Gaza.”

Her words echo those of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who last month claimed that “there is no policy of starvation in Gaza” and “there is no starvation in Gaza.”

The next day, President Donald Trump pushed back, stating that the region is suffering from “real starvation” and “you can’t fake that.”

Greene has repeatedly broken with her party in recent weeks, including her opposition to Trump’s recent artificial intelligence executive order and her call for the Trump administration to release the so-called Epstein files.

“I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to the Republican Party as much anymore,” Greene told the Daily Mail earlier this month. “I don't know which one it is.”

Greene issues scathing rebuke of conditions in Gaza: ‘I will not be silent about it’

Ashleigh Fields
Sat 23 August 2025
THE HILL

Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R) on Saturday continued her crusade against conditions in the Gaza Strip following a declaration of famine in the region by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification.

“U.S. taxpayers fund Israel $3.8 billion annually for military aid. That means every U.S. tax payer is contributing to Israel’s military actions,” Greene wrote in a Saturday post on the social platform X.

“I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to pay for genocide in a foreign country against a foreign people for a foreign war that I had nothing to do with. And I will not be silent about it,” she added.

The Georgia Republican lawmaker has urged her colleagues to raise their voices on the topic and urge the Trump administration to shift its stance on repeated strikes on Palestinians in the region.

Several world leaders have spoken out against the Israeli government’s actions and said they would take the necessary steps to recognize Palestine as a sovereign state.

However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has slammed their decisions and maintains that the government’s objective is to eliminate Hamas, the terrorist group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

“The innocent people in Gaza did not kill and kidnap the innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th,” Greene wrote on Saturday.

“Just as we spoke out and had compassion for the victims and families of Oct7, how can Americans not speak out and have compassion for the masses of innocent people and children in Gaza? Is one type of innocent life worthy and another type of innocent life worth nothing?” she asked.

She told her followers, “God sees all innocent lives the same” after slamming the State Department for halting the approval of Gazans’ U.S. visitor visas for groups seeking medical treatment.

Some conservatives have shared objections to her statements.

“Why are you advocating for GAZANS to come to the US? How is Islamic immigration ‘America First’?” Laura Loomer wrote Saturday on X.

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) weighed in on Greene’s statements in May, brushing aside the genocidal narrative.

“I [honestly] don’t care what crazy pants thinks,” Fetterman replied. “And why is that news and her views on that right now?”

“It’s not a genocide, you know, that’s just not the case. And she’s entitled to her opinion, but I’m entitled to not really care what her views on that is,” he added later.

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Anti-war protests in front of Israeli ministers' homes as relatives demand deal with Hamas

Relatives of those held captive in Gaza demonstrated on Sunday outside the residences of Israeli ministers, calling for a ceasefire and a deal with Hamas for the release of the hostages.

"We will not forgive any further delay," said a statement from the Hostages and Missing Families Forum. "Listen to the people: End this war and bring everyone home."

The protesters gathered outside the homes of six cabinet members, including Defense Minister Israel Katz and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar. Another nationwide protest day is planned in Israel on Tuesday.

Netanyahu remains unmoved by Israel’s lurch toward pariah status − but at home and abroad, Israelis are suffering the consequences

Asher Kaufman, University of Notre Dame
Sat 23 August 2025 
THE CONVERSATION

Israel’s conduct in Gaza increasingly risks turning the state into a pariah.

Whereas world leaders initially rallied around Israel after the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre by Hamas militants, the resulting destruction inside the Palestinian enclave has seen the country ever more isolated on the international stage.

In recent weeks, even long-standing allies such as Germany, the U.K. and Australia have distanced themselves from the Israeli government, notably by pushing for recognition of Palestinian statehood.

As an Israeli scholar of the Middle East working in the U.S., I have seen how these international currents are affecting Israel’s standing in the world. And while the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stood defiant and unmoved by the hardening stance against it, the blowback against its citizens is certainly being felt.

Images of starvation

The change in attitude toward Israel has been unfolding since soon after the start of the war. It has been driven by Israeli actions that are increasingly seen as disproportionate and indefensible. But it has reached new heights – or lows – in recent months given the increasingly desperate plight of Palestinians being broadcast around the globe.

Horrifying images of starving children and thousands of people skirmishing for scraps of food in what a U.N.-backed body has called famine are now regularly reported in media outlets around the world and in the U.S. Even conservative platforms such as Fox News that until recently were sympathetic to Israel’s response to Oct. 7 have dedicated airtime to reporting on the hunger crisis and questioning its motives.


Palestinian children struggle to acquire food in the Gaza Strip.
  Moiz Salhi/Anadolu via Getty Images

Increasingly, Israel’s onslaught on Gaza – which to date has killed at least 62,000 people, around half of whom are women and children, and left 70% of the strip in ruins – is being viewed through a critical lens.

Nearly two years after the attack that sparked the Israeli operation, the war aims of Israel are understood more and more as politically motivated, with the purpose being the political survival of Netanyahu and his government.

There is increasing international condemnation and sanctioning of some of the government’s more prominent members who are accused of using genocidal language against the Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere.

Australia recently barred the entrance of one far-right Israeli parliamentarian, citing his violent and inflammatory language against Palestinians. The U.K. has sanctioned two members of Netanyahu’s government, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for similar reasons.

Moreover, international organizations and scholars are increasingly framing the actions of the Israeli government as a whole in Gaza as genocide – and recently two Israeli human rights organizations have joined them.


Israeli public opinion

But to what extent are Israeli citizens being conflated with the Netanyahu government in international criticism?

Israeli public opinion polls tell a complex story of views on the war in Gaza. On one hand, Netanyahu’s government remains deeply unpopular among 70% of Israeli citizens, and a growing number of Israelis now fully believe that the prime minister is prolonging the war for his own political interests.


Such sentiment has seen an uptick in protests over the war. On Aug. 17, the country practically shut down during a widespread strike and demonstration against the government. Hundreds of thousands of people gathered in Tel Aviv in an unprecedented mass rally, calling for the end of the war and a ceasefire deal that would bring all hostages back.

Yet polls also show that a majority of Israelis remain either indifferent to the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza or are in support of it, as dehumanization of Palestinians is widespread among large swaths of Israeli society.


It seems that only recently cracks in this wall of indifference have emerged.

Bans, booing and ostracism

The labeling of Israel as a pariah state internationally does not seem to bother the government.

Netanyahu insists that all the reporting about the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza is fake news, orchestrated by Hamas and antisemitic forces around the world. Netanyahu has also responded to the moves by Western governments to recognize the Palestinian state by labeling their decisions as antisemitic.

But there are signs that international condemnation of the war in Gaza is affecting Israelis themselves – both at home and abroad.

Israelis and Israeli organizations from all walks of life are facing increased instances of anti-Israeli actions and sentiments.

The movement to boycott, divest and sanction Israel, known as BDS, has been in existence since 2005, but until the war in Gaza it had only limited success in generating wide support for its campaign. Now, 20 years after its establishment, the floodgates have seemingly been lifted and resulted in a deluge of boycotts and other actions that are slowly affecting almost every sector in Israel. To give one example, the British grocery chain Co-op earlier this year announced that it would stop sourcing Israeli produce at its 2,300 stores.

Israeli tourists in Greece have been targeted by pro-Palestinian demonstrations. And there are multiple reports of Israeli tourists being questioned or harassed elsewhere for their possible involvement in the war in Gaza.

There is pressure on FIFA to force Israel out of the global soccer organization, and matches involving Israeli teams in European capitals have been marred by violence by fans on both sides.

Meanwhile, a growing number of academics around the world are refusing to collaborate with their Israel peers. The EU is considering a move to block Israel from accessing its prestigious Horizon Europe research and innovation program. And Israeli artists are now regularly ostracized and disinvited from artistic events around the world, from music festivals to architecture exhibitions.

International cultural events that are scheduled to take place in Israel are now routinely modified or canceled, as just happened with the International Harp Competition, which had been scheduled for December 2025. Meanwhile, the popular Eurovision Song Contest has now been a site of anti-Israeli demonstrations for the second year in a row. This is despite Israeli fans of the event, hugely popular among the LGBTQ community, belonging predominantly to the progressive left-leaning camp in Israel – the very people most likely to be in opposition to the current government.



A protestor whistles and waves the Palestinian flag as Yuval Raphael, representing Israel, performs during the rehearsal of the 69th Eurovision Song Contest opening ceremony on May 15, 2025, in Basel, Switzerland. Harold Cunningham/Getty ImagesMore

Israelis have responded to this challenge in multiple ways. Even prior to the mass demonstration on Aug. 17, tens of thousands of Israelis have protested the government for months on end, accusing Netanyahu and his far-right government for turning Israel into a pariah state. Artists and academics have issued petitions, acknowledging Israeli’s responsibility for the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and calling for the end of the war.

Abroad, Israelis, who are known for being avid international tourists, are now traveling more to sites that are deemed less hostile to Israel. Many prefer not to disclose their Israeli identify. Reservists and discharged soldiers are fearful of being arrested abroad after posting on social media about their military service in Gaza.


Claims of antisemitism

Yet Netanyahu, who is subject to an outstanding arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court, along with his far-right Cabinet, seem to be unmoved. The global isolation may even serve their narrow interests by putting Israel in this precarious situation and helping them mobilize their base around the argument that all anti-Israeli actions are motivated by antisemitism.

And while antisemitism is real and widespread, and some of it drives anti-Israeli actions, it is a far cry to argue that antisemitism – and not Israeli government policy – is the main reason for current global sentiments and actions against the country.

The government is particularly indifferent to areas that are considered “elitist” and that have been mainly affected by the global protest movement against Israel.

Members of the government and its supporters see Israeli academia or Israeli arts as fields filled with liberal leftists whose power should be curbed. It is telling that when the Weitzman Institute, one of Israel’s most distinguished academic centers, was hit by an Iranian missile during the 12-day war in June, a popular far-right radio and TV anchor and supporter of the government tweeted: “God 1; Weitzman Institute 0.” The suggestion was that God punished this globally renowned academic institution for its lack of support for the government.

The tweet was condemned by journalists and some members of the opposition but was endorsed and repeated on Channel 14, widely known as Netanyahu’s “house TV channel.” Government officials remained silent.

When this is the sentiment among the government and its supporters, why would they be bothered with the consequences to Israeli academia and indeed its citizens by Israel being increasingly seen as a pariah state?

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Asher Kaufman, University of Notre Dame


Ex-State Dept. Employee Breaks Silence On Firing Over Israel-Palestine Language

Sanjana Karanth
Sun 24 August 2025 
HUFFPOST

A top press officer who was fired by the State Department last week after pushing back on the government’s aggressive language regarding Israel and Palestinians now says his ouster is contributing to a “chilling effect” within the department, particularly among colleagues who share his concerns.

In his first interview since his firing, Shahed Ghoreishi told Democracy Now that while the State Department gave no explanation for his exit, the incident followed several disputes in which department officials condemned Ghoreishi for characterizing U.S. positions on Gaza to include what the former press officer said was humanity and empathy.

“I believe that basic U.S. interests and human decency were important in my role,” Ghoreishi told the outlet Friday. “And last week, I think three events from Sunday, Monday and Tuesday built up to aggravate the radical ideologues at the State Department and in Embassy Jerusalem to lead to my firing.”

Ghoreishi had been serving as a press officer since September 2024, and in January moved to draft official language and talking points specifically about the U.S. government’s position on Israeli-Palestinian affairs.

On Aug. 17, Ghoreishi suggested that language around Israel’s recent killing of high-profile Palestinian journalist Anas al-Sharif and his five colleagues should include mourning for the loss of journalists and condolences to their families. According to the ex-press officer, the department immediately said it cannot give condolences because Israel has accused al-Sharif of being a member of Hamas.

“I have an issue with relying on Israelis for every intelligence and comments. So we should be able to pause and evaluate things,” Ghoreishi told Democracy Now. “If they had said, ‘Hey we’re gonna wait 48 hours and confirm,’ that’d be one thing. But immediately deferring to the Israelis is highly problematic.”



On Aug. 18, State Department leadership rejected a line drafted by Ghoreishi in a press release about Israel’s plan to violently force nearly a million Palestinians out of Gaza City. The line read, “We do not support forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza,” a message previously used by President Donald Trump and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.

On Aug. 19, Ghoreishi pushed back against an effort to officially refer to the occupied West Bank as the biblical “Judea and Samaria,” a name used by many Israelis and Zionists. The Washington Post reported that the effort was largely led by David Milstein, a top adviser to U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee. Ghoreishi was still able to cut the line, keeping the previously approved “West Bank” as official State Department language.

“In a general sense, the civil servants there are doing their job. They know their role, they recognize the administration they’re under and the prerogative,” he said. “But at the same time, people are aware that, especially in the press context … being empathetic, a bit more empathetic, just at least showing concern, is just basic press advice. And so people are concerned about the aggressive language.”

“And now when someone like Milstein and the secretary’s office clamp down and fire someone like me, that puts a chilling effect on people who might give that advice, that we need to call this out or be more empathetic or try to deliver things with a bit more human decency,” he added.

After his firing, the Iranian American was targeted by right-wing figure Laura Loomer, who accused him of not being loyal enough to the Trump administration and its Middle East policies. Tommy Pigott, the State Department’s deputy spokesperson, said the department “has zero tolerance for employees” who leak “confidential deliberate emails or information.” Ghoreishi called the accusations “baseless.”
Who is the Israeli ‘king maker’ and extremist who even has Netanyahu running scared?

With famine officially declared in Gaza, Foreign Editor David Pratt profiles Itamar Ben-Gvir a man who would happily see Palestinians starve to death in the name of a “Greater Israel

David Pratt
Sat 23 August 2025
HERALD SCOTLAND


Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks during a meeting with President Donald Trump in the Blue Room of the White House


LONG READ


The video posted on social media was only 13 seconds long. It showed an encounter between two men, implacable foes. One was Israel’s National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir.

The other man was Marwan Barghouti, the most prominent Palestinian prisoner in Israeli custody who has been held for 23 years mostly in solitary confinement and who is often considered the leading candidate to succeed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

In the video that appeared last week, Ben-Gvir can be seen taunting and threatening Barghouti who, now thin and frail, was unrecognisable from the man I interviewed near the West Bank town of Ramallah back in June 2001 at the height of second Palestinian intifada or uprising.

Back then Barghouti was on the run from the Israeli authorities, but last week confined to his cell, there was no way of avoiding the “raid” by Ben-Gvir the intention of which was to intimidate and humiliate.

The encounter between the two men unfolded within a wider theatre of intimidation in great part orchestrated by Ben-Gvir that last week in Gaza the United Nations described as a “failure of humanity”.

More than half a million Palestinians across the territory the international body confirmed, now face “catastrophic” conditions characterised by “starvation, destitution and death.”

Or to put this another way, famine now “officially” exits in Gaza City and surrounding areas, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) a globally recognised system for grading the severity of food insecurity and malnutrition.

Just as Barghouti had no way of avoiding Ben-Gvir’s threats, likewise millions of Palestinians have no sanctuary against the hunger and onslaught of Israel’s new military offensive dubbed “Operation Gideon’s Chariots II” aimed at occupying Gaza City.

For his part Ben-Gvir appears to relish the physical and psychological trauma being inflicted on Gaza’s population. Likewise in an escalating pattern of Israeli abuse of the more than 10,000 Palestinians in its custody, Ben-Gvir enjoys reminding detainees of Gaza’s annihilation.

Last week alongside the video of Ben-Gvir taunting Barghouti, another video appeared showing the security minister standing before a large billboard sized photograph depicting Gaza’s rubble and flattened buildings.

The same photograph and others like them, have been placed in Israel’s prisons holding Palestinians who are reportedly forced to walk by them when they go for their daily yard time exercise. Ben-Gvir even claims that one of the prisoners recognised his home among the destruction.

'Don't mess with us'

According to reports in the online news portal Middle East Eye, the video was released with a caption that said the photos were being displayed so the Palestinian prisoners “understand that you don’t mess with the people of Israel.”

UN Spokesperson Stephane Dujarric called the video “disturbing” and stressed that all prisoners need to be treated “in a way that abides by international law and that respects their inherent dignity.”

According to the Palestinian Prisoner Society, Israel has imprisoned over 10,800 Palestinians as of early August. This includes 49 women, 450 children, and 2,378 people labelled as “unlawful combatants.” The figure excludes detainees held in Israeli military camps, as well as prisoners from Lebanon and Syria

For years now throughout his political career Ben-Gvir has become infamous for his provocative statement and actions. In that time too along with fellow ultra nationalist and Israeli Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, both men have held the balance of power in the coalition government of Prime Minister, Benyamin Netanyahu.

This ‘king maker’ position has enabled them to consolidate decades of settler activity and other policies outside of parliamentary legitimacy into influencing government policy.

Just last week in the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz, an article suggested that Netanyahu is more scared of Ben-Gvir and Smotrich than he is of the growing ire among his own citizens.

“As usual, he's manoeuvring between the demands of his coalition partners (continuation of the war, full occupation of the Gaza Strip, resumption of settlements) and mounting public dissent, evident in the weekly demonstrations. But at the moment it's no contest: Smotrich and Ben-Gvir scare him more,” observed Haaretz correspondent Amos Harel.


Earlier this month to mark the Jewish holiday of Tisha B’Av, a day of mourning and repentance when Jews reflect on the destruction of the First and Second Temples, key events in Jewish history, Ben Gvir visited Jerusalem’s most sensitive holy site.

Known to Jews as Temple Mount the holiest site in Judaism and Muslims as al- Haram al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary) the third-holiest site in Islam, it has often been a flashpoint in the region.

Such was the case back in 2000 when Israeli politician Ariel Sharon made a provocative visit sparking protests that were a precursor to the second Palestinian intifada.

Ben-Gvir’s recent visit was viewed in much the same way at precisely the moment Israel is facing international condemnation over its war in Gaza.



Israels National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir speaks to the press as he joins Jewish nationalists, including far-right activists, rallying at Jerusalems Damascus Gate on June 5, 2024 during the so-called Jerusalem Day flag march

Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir speaks to the press as he joins Jewish nationalists, including far-right activists, rallying at Jerusalem's Damascus Gate

Terror organisation


Born in 1976 in Jerusalem to Iraqi Jewish immigrants, Ben-Gvir joined Kach, an ultra-nationalist movement described by America as a terrorist organisation, at the age of 16.

Kach was led by the racist rabbi Meir Kahane, a violent anti-Arab nationalist who called for Arab Israelis to be stripped of their citizenship.

At one time on the political fringe, for years Ben Gvir was shunned by right-wingers as an extremist. But he was to make a name for himself in 1995, after being exempted from conscription to the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) because of his extreme views, by threatening Yitzhak Rabin, the prime minister, on television, saying he would “get to him”. Rabin was assassinated by an Israeli ultra-nationalist three weeks later.

In 2013 Ben-Gvir joined the Knesset slate for Jewish Power, an ideological successor to Kach, and became its leader in 2019. Shortly afterwards he called for “disloyal” Arabs to be expelled from Israel and has been filmed waving a gun in the faces of Palestinians protesting in East Jerusalem. He has been indicted more than 50 times (and convicted once) for inciting violence and hate speech.

In an interview with Israel’s Channel 12 broadcaster in 2023, he declared that his rights trump those of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.

“My right, and my wife’s and my children’s right to get around on the roads in Judea and Samaria, is more important than the right to movement for Arabs,” he said, effectively advocating for a regime of apartheid.

Since then Ben-Gvir has consistently pressured Netanyahu to maintain the war in Gaza and escalate illegal settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank.

Recently in a move seen as an effort to deepen Israel’s de facto annexation of the occupied West Bank Ben-Gvir was instrumental in the creation of a new police unit composed of illegal armed settlers, dubbed the “First Response Unit.”

At an inauguration ceremony at the Tomb of the Patriarchs in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron, Ben Gvir, said 105 settlers have been recruited to the new force, which now has squads in the illegal settlements of Efrat, Gush Etzion, Kiryat Arba, and Hebron.

“These squads represent a departure from the ‘defensive mindset’ and towards a combative, militant and offensive mindset,” said Ben Gvir, himself a resident of the illegal Kiryat Arba settlement.

Ben Gvir went on to describe the unit’s settlers as an “inseparable part of society,” praising them for providing “quick responses in the field.” He called the move an embodiment of “real sovereignty and practical Zionism,” suggesting it contributes to Israel’s long-sought goal of annexing the West Bank.

The Israeli police confirmed that members of the new unit received combat training, special police powers, and advanced equipment. The formation of the “First Response Unit,” came just a week after 14 Israeli ministers and Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana signed a letter demanding Netanyahu immediately annex the occupied West Bank.



Palestinians carry sacks of flour unloaded from a humanitarian aid convoy on the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip, Saturday, Aug. 23, 2025. 
(AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana).

Palestinians carry sacks of flour unloaded from a humanitarian aid convoy on the outskirts of Beit Lahiya, northern Gaza Strip, Saturday, Aug. 23, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)

120,000 firearms


From as far back as October 2023, Ben-Gvir has been leading an effort to arm settlers in the occupied West Bank settlements and by October last year ensured that over 120,000 firearms had been distributed among settlers framing the effort as protection from “terrorism”.

The evidence compiled by multiple human rights organisation however tells a very different story, with a dramatic spike in the killing of unarmed Palestinians by settlers, including children.

Israeli advocacy organisation, Peace Now, described Ben Gvir’s new First Response Unit as “an armed militia of his friends in the settlements,” and alleged that the police were “giving extremists power and support to undermine security.”

The organisation also pointed out that following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, the IDF had established “regional defence battalions” in the West Bank composed overwhelmingly of residents of settlements.

Since October 7, the West Bank has experienced an average of four documented incidents of settler violence per day according to data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

In great part this has occurred because of Ben-Gvir’s strategy of enabling settler expansion and prioritising settler interests. What was once portrayed as fringe extremism has now been fully absorbed into Israeli state policy say observers.

Today as a result say human rights activists, the line between security forces and settlers has dissolved almost entirely. The violence has reached new heights over the past two years, leading many West Bank Palestinians to flee their villages en-masse.

Ben-Gvir’s actions along with that of his fellow far-right ultranationalist ally Smotrich, resulted in the UK government’s decision in June this year to impose sanctions on both men with UK foreign secretary David Lammy saying the pair had “incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights.”

With characteristic defiance, both men dismissed the sanctions with Ben-Gvir saying: “We survived Pharaoh, we will also survive Keir Starmer,” and Smotrich noting that: “Britain has already tried once to prevent us from settling the cradle of our homeland, and we will not allow it to do so again.”

But the West Bank aside, it is in Gaza where Ben-Gvir and Smotrich’s messianic belief in the Jewish people’s right to what they call “Greater Israel” is being enacted most comprehensively and unsparingly using Israel’s military bludgeoning.

Ben Gvir has claimed there is “no real hunger in Gaza,” his assessment flying in the face of overwhelming evidence and the announcement of the existence of famine in Gaza City last week under the IPC system.

Many observers are firmly of the belief that Ben Gvir and Smotrich will not rest until they see all Palestinians removed from Gaza and the West Bank and will continue to use all the political leverage they can to ensure that Netanyahu complies with their ‘Greater Israel’ aspirations.


5-year-old polio patient Yamen Zayed, who was displaced with his family due to Israeli attacks and the blockade on Gaza


Hostages in danger


Last week, Israel's Coordinator for Hostages and Missing Persons, Gal Hirsch, appealed to Ben-Gvir, urging him to soften his rhetoric against Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails, warning that such remarks could endanger the hostages still held in Gaza.

Released hostages have testified that Ben-Gvir's past statements about tightening prison conditions for Palestinians led to harsher treatment of them while in captivity by Hamas. But few hold out much hope the Ben-Gvir will take heed.

Writing in the daily Haaretz, the columnist Gideon Levy, reflected on the encounter last week between Ben-Gvir and Palestinian leader Marwan Barghouti who Levy knew before his arrest more than two decades ago

“Of the two, he (Barghouti) is the man of peace and justice - despite having been convicted of five counts of murder. Both men have been convicted on terror charges, but Barghouti represents a nation without an army, a state or any national rights,” observed Levy.

“He therefore turned to the path of terror after tirelessly trying the path of diplomacy. Ben-Gvir is a cabinet minister of a state that has an unrestrained army, and he represents a nation that is the supreme nation in this land - in Ben-Gvir's eyes, the only nation,” Levy concluded, summing up the latest unedifying episode in Israel’s unrelenting Gaza onslaught.