Thursday, September 24, 2026

NDP leader says Ottawa breaking labour law as Bank of Canada strike nears 100 days




Published:

TIFF MACKLEN GOV BANK OF CANADA

OTTAWA — NDP Leader Avi Lewis said the federal government is defying its own labour laws after the head of the Bank of Canada admitted to using replacement workers during a strike involving security officers.

In 2024, Canada passed legislation to ban federally regulated workplaces from bringing in replacement workers during a legal strike, and the new rules took effect last year.

At a rally outside the Bank of Canada Wednesday, Lewis said this strike is the first test of that law.

“This government and this employer have made it absolutely clear that they are prepared to defy the law of this country,” he said.

Security officers at the Bank of Canada went on strike in June after talks failed to secure a new collective agreement between the central bank and the union.

The Canada Industrial Relations Board has released two decisions indicating the central bank contravened the Canada Labour Code by using contractors and the services of union members during the strike.

NDP leader Avi Lewis is seen during a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Tiff Macklem, governor of the Bank of Canada, said in July that some exceptions to the rules allow for the use of replacement workers when necessary to prevent threats to life, health or safety, or to prevent serious damage to property.

“Ahead of the CIRB’s first ruling, the Bank made representations regarding the minimum necessary arrangements to ensure the security of our facilities and people in light of the strike,” he said.

“The bank felt it necessary to put in place alternative arrangements that, in the bank’s view, adhered to the Canada Labour Code and the previous CIRB ruling. The CIRB subsequently ruled a second time. The bank has also complied with that decision.”

Dozens of union members gathered in downtown Ottawa Wednesday as the Bank of Canada strike reached 93 days. Also present was a giant inflatable rat wearing a necklace with a $20 bill with Macklem’s face.

Alex Silas, national executive vice-president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada, said at the rally that the union is asking the Crown corporation to come back to the bargaining table and to remove its concessions.

A person walks past the Bank of Canada in Ottawa, on Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

“It’s concerning how little they respect their security officers that they would replace us instead of settling on a fair deal,” he said. “And it’s also concerning that they have completely untrained, unqualified people doing security at the Bank of Canada right now.”

Labour leaders are denouncing what they call a direct attack on the right to strike in the sweeping economic bill the Liberal government tabled Monday.

The Liberals claim the bill would place “guardrails” around a minister’s power to end work stoppages in federally regulated industries. Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu argues the changes in Bill C-39 are aimed at improving labour relations and reducing the number of times negotiations hit a boiling point.

According to the proposed Building Canada Strong Act, a work stoppage must be affecting the “national interest” before the minister can trigger Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to end a strike or lockout.

The government says it must balance threats to the national interest -- which could include economic impacts or social disruptions -- with the need to protect the right to free association and to strike.

Canadian Labour Congress President Bea Bruske speaks during a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress, told reporters in Ottawa on Tuesday that the proposed amendments would formalize the government’s power to break strikes.

Bruske said labour leaders are considering legal avenues to address the proposed changes but suggested those conversations are still in the early stages.

Unifor National president Lana Payne also accused the government of compromising workers’ right to strike in a media statement on Tuesday.

Lewis said Wednesday the labour movement across the country is “on fire against what is being called a direct attack on the fundamental right of workers to withhold their labour.”

“The right to strike is under attack in Canada by the government, by the prime minister, who used to run this little shop at the Bank of Canada behind us,” he said while standing in front of the central bank’s head office.

Unifor National President Lana Payne speaks to media after the opening of bargaining between Unifor and Stellantis, in Toronto, on Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sammy Kogan

“The 49 workers who protect the people inside this building are exercising their right to strike and the government agency is bringing in replacement workers. This is a bad sign. It’s a terrible message.”

A statement issued by the Bank of Canada Wednesday said the Crown corporation respects the security officers’ right to strike and remains committed to the collective bargaining process and to working with the union to negotiate a fair settlement.

“When the Canadian Industrial Relations Board issued its orders, the Bank stopped using the external security support as directed,” said the statement. “The Bank continues to comply with these orders and has not used that support since July 23.”

The statement said the Bank of Canada remains committed to “taking all necessary measures to ensure Canada’s central bank is secure.”

“The Bank will not, under any circumstances, compromise the safety and security of our employees, our buildings and the assets we protect on behalf of Canadians,” it said. “The Bank has put in place a strong temporary plan, led by our experienced security managers, to support our operations at head office.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 23, 2026.




 

This map shows which Canadian cities are most impacted by tariffs





Published:

People shop at a Loblaws store in Toronto on Thursday, May 3, 2018. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette



At the onset of a trade war with the U.S. last year, researchers at the University of Toronto set out to better understand what the impact would be for workers in different cities.

Nearly a year and several rounds of tariffs later, their answer for Toronto is roughly 66,000 workers and 3,000 businesses, and counting.

Mapping Tariffs was first launched right after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed an initial round of tariffs in March 2025, which hit the automobile and steel sectors hardest. The purpose of the team’s research was to answer a straightforward question: what are the impacts of tariffs across all cities in Canada?

Researchers at the University of Toronto’s School of Cities examined a litany of resources from government agencies in both Canada and the U.S. to paint a picture of how vulnerable each province, region, municipality and community was to each round of tariffs.

“We think it would be a useful tool to help explain to the public where the vulnerability to U.S. tariffs might be, but also to help policymakers at the local level understand very specifically, in a granular way,” Tara Vinodrai, a professor at the University of Toronto in the Institute for Management and Innovation and one of the researchers behind the project, told CTV News

Mapping Tariffs map of the potential direct exposure of U.S. tariffs on businesses throughout Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area. (Mapping Tariffs)

Mapping Tariffs has been continuously updated to reflect the impacts of every round of new tariffs, with its most recent revision on Sept. 1.

Vinodrai said the team moved quickly to add data on Section 338 tariffs, which targeted alcohol and dairy products.

“The day we released it, Trump, of course, announced simultaneously that he was changing and altering the 338 tariffs, adding more products, banning some products,” Vinodrai said, adding the team is currently working on that revision. “It’s the project that keeps giving.”

Users can toggle through various goods subject to U.S. tariffs and see their potential impact on businesses and employees in different Canadian cities.

A map highlighting potential direct exposure to tariffs shows 3,027 businesses (3.2 per cent) in Toronto are affected by the latest round of levies imposed in late August.

Roughly 66,000 employees who work in Toronto (four per cent) are exposed.

Meanwhile in Vaughan, roughly 1,000 businesses (5.7 per cent) are estimated to be directly exposed to tariffs. This impacts 32,555 employees who work in the Vaughan census subdivision (12 per cent) and just shy of 12,000 workers who live in the area (6.7 per cent) but might be employed elsewhere.

In Windsor, Ont., home to automotive assembly plants for Ford and Stellantis, 4.5 per cent of businesses are impacted. Around 12,100 employees who work in Windsor (11.6 per cent) are also directly impacted by tariffs.

Across the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, which includes municipalities from Ajax to Milton, Mapping Tariffs says an estimated 7.3 per cent of businesses are potentially impacted. More than 200,000 employees who work in Toronto (around 13.5 per cent) are likely feeling the impacts of the tariffs, the researchers say.

The estimated percentage and number of businesses directly exposed to tariffs in effect after Aug. 22, 2026. (Mapping Tariffs)

Vinodrai said the diversity of Toronto’s economy acts as a buffer for the city.

“It’s clear in all of our analysis that this new round of tariffs basically widens and deepens the effects on Canadian cities and neighbourhoods. Toronto is not immune from that,” she said.

“But what’s good in the case of Toronto, relative to many other Canadian cities, is it’s got an incredibly diverse industrial base ... It protects it a little more from the immediate impacts, as compared to some of the very specialized, smaller cities in southern Ontario or across Canada.”

The School of Cities researchers say assessing the effects of tariffs is not a straightforward task, given the dynamic economic landscape, the varying responses businesses are taking to the levies and shifting consumer habits.

But Vinodrai said the map can still be used to guide policymakers on how to respond to each new round of tariffs.

“There are efforts in Toronto and in other cities, too, to think about how to respond at the local level to tariffs, whether that means reaching out to local businesses to encourage them to think about where they are exporting to and thinking about ... different markets beyond the U.S.,” she said.

\Alex Arsenych

Opens in new window

Journalist, CTVNewsToronto.ca