New Poll: Americans Reject Deporting Foreigners for ‘Wrongthink’ on Middle East
An important new public opinion survey taken by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) has revealed very little American support for the deportation of legal foreign guests in the United States for expressing support for Palestine in its current conflict with Israel.
Responding to FIRE’s quarterly National Speech Index survey conducted by the Dartmouth Polarization Research Lab this month, a mere one-quarter of the respondents supported the deportation of non-citizens legally in the US for expressing pro-Palestine views. A solid majority of 52 percent are strongly opposed or opposed to such measures.
The survey result comes as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has boasted of revoking “at least 300” student visas for the “crime” of expressing a position on middle east politics that the current US Administration disagrees with. Derided by Rubio as “lunatics” for opposing ongoing US government support for Israel as Gaza is flattened, many foreign students have been arrested by masked, armed federal agents – who refuse to even identify themselves – and sent to a federal detention facility in Louisiana.
In the case of Turkish PhD student Rumeysa Ozturk, the State Department had already produced a report concluding that she neither supported terrorism nor anti-Semitism before masked federal agents accosted her on the street and arrested her.
Her “crime” was co-authoring an op-ed in her university newspaper a year earlier criticizing Israel.
In many cases these arrests are carried out based on lists provided to the federal government by a militant, extremist group called Betar. The group is so radical that it has even been added to the pro-Israel ADL’s “extremism” list, yet somehow it has the ear of the Trump Administration.
Commenting on the findings, FIRE Chief Research Advisor Sean Stevens said, “deporting someone simply for disagreeing with the government’s foreign policy preferences strikes at the very freedoms the First Amendment was designed to protect. Americans are right to reject this kind of viewpoint-based punishment.”
Additionally, the shocking arrests and incarceration of legal residents or guests for committing no crime beyond expressing a particular point of view has begun to eat away at Americans’ confidence that the Trump Administration can be trusted to uphold the First Amendment. From Inauguration day until the FIRE poll this month, a majority of Americans have now lost confidence in the Trump Administration’s respect for our most sacred right of free expression:
Many Americans mistakenly believe government “grants” rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, and that it grants them to American citizens only. Constitutional scholar Andrew Napolitano dismisses such claims, writing:
We know from the writings of James Madison – who authored the Bill of Rights – that the Founders regarded the freedom of speech as a personal individual natural right. It is also, of course, expressly protected from government interference and reprisal in the First Amendment. The courts have ruled that it protects all persons – no matter their immigration status – who may think as they wish, say what they think, publish what they say, worship or not and associate with whomever they choose.
While many supporters of the Trump Administration are currently applauding the arrest and deportation of legal foreign residents who express political views they do not support, they would do well to keep in mind that the vicissitudes of the American body politic may well soon turn against them and their views, and – particularly given President Trump’s stated intent to begin deporting American citizens as well – once the trap of a precedent is set they may not be able to wiggle out of it.
Indispensable pro-liberty intellectual Jim Bovard expressed it best in a recent article:
What legal perils will pro-freedom protestors face in the coming years if the Ozturk rule is canonized, entitling federal officials to crush any disfavored opinion? Big-spending Democrats may consecrate Modern Monetary Theory and demonize anyone who criticizes the Federal Reserve. I took this ‘Kill the Central Bank’ photo of Ron Paul supporters at a 2008 Capitol Hill event for his presidential campaign. If the same protestors had peacefully carried the same banner within a half mile of the Capitol on January 6, they likely would have been nailed on a bevy of federal charges. Many politicians have made stark their hatred of libertarians and freedom advocates.
As long as anyone is sitting in shackles in a federal detention center simply for writing an op-ed, freedom of speech is not safe for anyone in the United States.
While a trip into the bowels of social media suggests a torch-bearing mob rallying to send those guilty of the “wrongthink” of the day to some El Salvadorian gulag, the good work of the freedom of expression organization FIRE reassures us that cooler heads continue to prevail. However, by no means does that suggest we can afford to let our guard down for a minute. This is not an issue of partisanship, but of principle. The mob – whether left or right – must not be allowed to take over.
Reprinted from the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.
Lessons of abductions and terror
Sunday 20 April 2025, by Against the Current Editors
The abduction of Mahmoud Khalil — the Palestinian graduate student and green card holder seized March 8 at his Columbia University residence — is now multiplied by other high-profile detentions and deportation threats, and dozens or even hundreds of unpublicized cases. Secretary of State Marco Rubio openly boasts as much.
These arrests and disappearances highlight a reign of terror confronting student visa and even green card holders. They pull together multiple interwoven aspects of the five-alarm civil and human rights emergency in the United States and the global U.S. empire:
• The U.S.-Israeli genocide in Palestine, which now openly threatens the forced depopulation of Gaza and the mass ethnic cleansing and Israel’s pending annexation of the West Bank.
• The drive to criminalize protest actions against the genocide, especially on college campuses.
• The collusion of the pro-Israeli Zionist and Christian-nationalist far right including Campus Watch, Betar USA, and Canary Mission identifying student and faculty activists for government targeting, expulsion and/or deportation.
• The intention of the Trump administration to destroy U.S. universities as institutions of scientific, cultural and critical thought — and the spectacular cowardice of college administrations at Columbia, the University of Michigan and others in capitulating to these attacks.
• The lawless conduct of the Trump gang, including blatant evasion of court orders blocking deportations.
• The connections between the far-right campaigns in both the United States and Israel, aimed at consolidating authoritarian rule in both countries.
We’ll discuss some specific cases. First, however, there’s no denying the overall terrifying moment facing targeted groups in the United States, to say nothing of Palestine — or tens of millions of people globally facing mass epidemics or starvation from the peremptory cutoff of U.S. funding of critical survival programs.
At the same time, vital services provided by federal government agencies and their work forces are being shredded on a daily basis with pending disastrous consequences for public health, military veterans’ care, public schools, the postal service, and soon Social Security and Medicare.
How to resist a multi-front assault that’s clearly designed to have such a paralyzing effect? First, it’s necessary to recognize the systemic and coordinated character of the attacks, so that the targets aren’t compartmentalized and the defense efforts isolated and divided.
The Targets
Mahmoud Khalil, Dr. Rasha Alawieh and Prof. Badar Khan Suri are not separate cases from, say, the threatened cut of $175 million in federal grants to the University of Pennsylvania for the crime of a transgender athlete participating in women’s sports, or a presidential decree annulling federal workers’ union contracts and bargaining rights.
Those interconnections are part of what brought out an estimated several million people April 5 demanding “Hands Off” into the streets of hundreds of U.S. cities and towns — large and small, blue states, red states and purple states — furious at the crimes of the Trump-Musk gang, and aghast over the astonishing market free-fall precipitated by Trump’s tariff rampage against the world economy.
The staying power of this popular resistance remains to be tested, but April 5 was one hell of a start.
To review some basic facts: Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia graduate with a green card and eight-months pregnant wife Noor Abdalla, was grabbed by Department of Homeland Security plainclothes agents as the couple returned to their university-owned residence.
Columbia had ignored Khalil‘s requests for protection as he’d sensed he was being followed. A prominent activist during last year’s encampment and a negotiator for the peaceful resolution of the occupation, Khalil has never been charged with any crime or university disciplinary action.
Upon being told his “student visa” (nonexistent) and then his green card were “revoked,” Mahmoud was taken to New Jersey and whisked to an isolated Louisiana detention facility before courts could intervene. A federal judge ordered the case to be moved back to New Jersey. These days, whether the Trump regime will obey this and other rulings remains to be seen.
Columbia student Yunseo Chung, 21, is a permanent resident who has lived in the United States since age 7. Now at an undisclosed location, she’s suing to prevent being deported after ICE agents raided and searched Columbia residences on the pretext that the school or its residences are “harboring and concealing illegal aliens on its campus.”
Neither “illegal” nor charged with anything, under what conceivable legal theory is Ms. Chung subject to deportation? Supposedly, participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations makes her “a detriment to U.S. foreign policy objectives” under the terms of a 1952 McCarthy-era law authorizing deportation on those grounds.
Dr. Rasha Alawieh, a kidney specialist, surgeon and assistant professor at Brown University Medicine, returning from a trip to Lebanon, was detained for 36 hours and then put on a return flight — in violation of an emergency court order barring her deportation.
The ostensible “grounds for removal”: Dr. Alawieh’s attendance at the funeral of Hasan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader assassinated by Israel, where tens of thousands of Lebanese were present.
These are far from the only cases of Trump’s agents evading a court order, as illustrated by the mass removal of alleged Venezuelan or Salvadoran “gang members” — absent proof or any shred of legal process — to the deadly “super-max” prison in El Salvador.
Despite admitting an “administrative error,” the government says the courts have “no jurisdiction” to order the return of the wrongfully deported Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a father living with protected status in the United States, who was picked up March 12 in Baltimore after finishing his factory shift.
Ranjani Srinivasan, a student from India whose doctoral work in urban planning is almost completed, was “disenrolled” by Columbia after ICE agents arrived at her apartment and, failing to gain entry to detain her, said her visa was cancelled and informed her that she had 15 days to leave the country.
Now seeking asylum in Canada but not disclosing her location to protect her safety, she told CBC News that she had no actual involvement in campus protests (she was apparently spotted in a crowd last spring at a time when her campus residence had been blocked off).
Grant Miner, president of the Columbia graduate student union and a fifth-year doctoral student, was fired from his job the day before bargaining on union’s contract began and expelled for pro-Palestinian activity.
Columbia’s despicable behavior in suppressing and expelling students last year is now compounded with its cowardly kowtowing to a set of draconian demands from the Trump White House. These measures include enhanced campus police powers, and banning masks and placing its highly regarded Middle East, African and Asian Studies center under external “trusteeship.”
It is strongly suspected that members of the university Trustees board actually fingered Khalil to the government. As professor emeritus and renowned historian Rashid Khalidi wrote in The Guardian (March 25, 2025):
“After Friday’s capitulation, Columbia barely merits the name of a university, since its teaching and scholarship on the Middle East, and soon much else, will soon be vetted by a ‘senior vice provost for inclusive pedagogy,’ in reality a senior vice provost for Israeli propaganda.
“Partisans of Israel, infuriated that scholarship on Palestine had found a place at Columbia, once named it ‘Bir Zeit on the Hudson.’ But if it any longer merits the name of a university, it should be called Vichy on the Hudson.” [Bir Zeit is the leading Palestinian university on the West Bank. “Vichy” refers to the World War II French puppet regime under Nazi occupation —ed.]
Badar Khan Suri is a Georgetown professor and postdoctoral scholar on religion and peace processes in the Middle East and South Asia, legally in the United States on a research scholarship and professorial visa. An Indian national who lives with his U.S. citizen wife and three children in Rosslyn, Virginia, when he arrived home March 17 after a Ramadan iftar meal celebration, Suri was taken into custody by masked federal agents without being accused of any crime.
In just over 72 hours, he was transferred to multiple immigration detention centers and then to an ICE staging center in Alexandria, Louisiana. Prof. Suri’s colleagues suspect that the government’s real target is his Palestinian-American wife Mapheze Saleh, who’s a citizen and can’t be rounded up for deportation.
On March 25, masked DHS agents similarly grabbed Tufts student activist Rumeysa Ozturk from the sidewalk, pulling her into an unmarked car. Like Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa was transported to an ICE Louisiana detention center without the knowledge of her lawyers or family.
Using the excuse of “Jewish safety” and the need to combat allegedly widespread and persistent antisemitism (a bonkers exaggeration, if there ever was one) at Harvard, Columbia, etc., should also be seen as a version of a standard rightwing ploy.
It is perversely aimed at getting the targets of these illegal and undemocratic assaults to “blame the Jews.” This is being done to deflect from the Right’s own agenda (that of MAGA, Christian Zionists, etc.) to destroy the authority of the liberal academic institutions; to detract attention from genuine antisemitism on the Right and in the Trump administration itself; to prohibit truth-telling about what is happening in Gaza; to engage in a campaign of increasing white supremacist ideology in education and elsewhere; and more.
We must stand up to the capitulators in academe and elsewhere who give credence to this lie, and not allow this crass exploitation of Jewish identity to happen — for the sake of Palestinian lives and for everyone’s future. A powerful example was set April 2 by Jewish Columbia students who chained themselves to the campus fence demanding freedom for their friend Mahmoud Khalil.
Crisis and Emergency Fightback
The present course — from rule by executive decree to terrorizing immigrant communities and pro-Palestinian activists to abolishing birthright citizenship — leads toward the substantive destruction of constitutional government in the United States, leaving some decorative wallpaper in place to disguise the rot.
Alongside the cowardice of many college administrations is that of some leading law firms capitulating to Trump. In contrast, civil liberties organizations and attorneys for targets of deportation are energetically intervening in court cases and sounding the alarm in media outlets. But from the top leadership of the Democratic Party comes deafening silence on the destruction of Palestine.
Senator Cory Booker’s March 31-April 1 speechathon pointed to multiple Trump-Musk abuses, but found no time to reference the slaughter in Palestine. Nor did this new hero of the Democrats join the 15 Senators who voted for Bernie Sanders’ resolution to disapprove the new massive shipment of U.S. weapons for Israel. And while dozens of Democratic members of Congress have issued a letter challenging Mahmoud Khalil’s detention, minority leader Hakeem Jeffries’ name is conspicuously absent.
To be sure, the repression we’re witnessing is embedded in a much broader crisis. It includes the blatant white-supremacist assaults on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs; the erasure of Black history and struggle from the Smithsonian museums, the Kennedy Center in Washington DC, the Defense Department website and elsewhere.
There’s also the potential for Trump’s tariff mania to ignite a U.S., North American and world economic slump. Some of these issues are discussed in this issue of Against the Current, including Kim Moody’s article on the economy and the Democrats’ inability to effectively respond.
The fightback is up to the grassroots, and begins with the defense of all those in the crosshairs of Trump’s repressive rampage. Of course, any supporter of basic First Amendment rights should be demanding Mahmoud Khalil’s immediate release, whatever their views of activism for Palestine.
At the same time, the agitation and activism for Palestinian freedom and against the genocide will and must continue, inspired by Khalil’s own example and courage.
We must insist that the fate of the Palestinian people as a mass human sacrifice on the altar of political cynicism, imperialism and settler colonialism is no isolated matter. It is inextricably tied to the struggles in our own society and the future of us all.
Against the Current 12 March 2025
P.S.
If you like this article or have found it useful, please consider donating towards the work of International Viewpoint. Simply follow this link: Donate then enter an amount of your choice. One-off donations are very welcome. But regular donations by standing order are also vital to our continuing functioning. See the last paragraph of this article for our bank account details and take out a standing order. Thanks.
Attached documentslessons-of-abductions-and-terror_a8940-2.pdf (PDF - 920.2 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article8940]
Against the Current Editors
Against the Current is published by Solidarity, USA, a sympathizing organization of the Fourth International. It is a bi-monthly analytical journal explaining its goal: as part of our larger project of regroupment and dialogue within the U.S. Left, the journal presents varying points of view on a wide variety of issues. As such, debates are frequent and informative, with the goal of promoting discussion among activists, organizers, and scholars on the Left.
International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment