Friday, October 02, 2026

'Not okay': Disappointed ranchers go on expletive-filled rant against Trump


US President Donald Trump speaks on the day he makes an announcement about an energy infrastructure project in Alaska, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 30, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

October 01, 2026 
ALTERNET

Ranchers in battleground states are furious about diesel prices and beef imports. According to a new report published on Thursday by the conservative newspaper the Washington Examiner, not only has the situation made said ranchers cursing mad toward President Donald Trump, but it could “cost Republicans a Senate seat in Kansas.”

“He doesn’t know what s—— is coming out of his mouth,” one particularly blunt farmer told the Examiner when asked about Trump’s performance. As the paper explains, “High diesel prices, expensive feed, pickups that cost almost as much as a house, and escalating land prices are putting the squeeze on the state’s cattle industry. Kansas produces almost a quarter of the nation’s beef and the issue has moved to the center of a tight Senate race, heaping pressure on the Republican candidate, Sen. Roger Marshall. And then there was the decision by President Donald Trump to lift tariffs and allow in hundreds of thousands of tons of ground beef from Central and South America.”

“I’m disappointed in Trump and the cattlemen’s association for not raising cane,” said 82-year-old rancher Chuck Madron. “They’re letting cattle in from Uruguay. They’re letting beef in from Mexico, Argentina, Brazil. What about us ranchers? Diesel is over $6.”


The high cost of diesel is being felt by everyone, stockyard owner Tylen Layton told the Examiner, saying it is driving down the prices of cattle at auction. His numbers show that the cost of moving an animal has risen by $1.50 per mile. “It just changed the whole dynamics of everything,” he explained. “You know, people can’t afford to give as much for the cattle now because they’re trying to afford the trucking to get them to their final destinations.” That translates to a reduction of $40 to $60 per 100 pounds, or about $300 to $600 less per head.

What’s more, writes the Examiner, “Trump’s move to allow in cheap exports has exasperated locals, who see it helping meat processors, or packers, or McDonald’s, but not shoppers or ranchers.” As Layton explained, “The problem is that we haven’t done the first thing to make beef cheaper for the Wichita, Kansas, housewife or the New York City housewife. They’re hurting us, making it cheap for the packers, but the packers aren’t going to bring their prices down when they sell it to the retailers.” According to the Examiner, ranchers are also concerned about an ICE crackdown on meatpacking plants in the state. As the paper explains, “The fear is that processing will grind to a halt if staff — mostly immigrants, some legal, some undocumented — stay home. The result is an outpouring of frustration with the Trump administration, which people see as too close to voters on the coasts and too far from beef country.”


As a result, “Democrats see an opening in a state that has not let them have a look in since the 1930s. Their challenger, Adam Hamilton, a megachurch pastor, took a 2-point lead over Marshall in a recent Emerson College/Nexstar poll.” In a recent debate, Hamilton blasted “trade wars, which actually in the last Trump administration cost beef farm beef ranchers in Kansas a billion dollars in trade that went to Brazil and Argentina.” He also decried the “diminishing of the workforce and arresting the workforce,” asserting that it was “making it harder for people to work in the livestock industry,” adding, “This is not okay.”

For his part, Marshall attempted to defend the tariffs, though he later gave a nod to political reality, toning down his once full-throated endorsement for immigration enforcement to signal a degree of disquiet. “When ICE operates in Kansas, it needs to coordinate with our local law enforcement,” Marshall posted. “Our sheriffs and police know these communities better than anyone, and working together keeps officers and residents safe.”

“That leaves Kansas ranchers, like farmers across the country, dealing with crippling diesel prices,” writes the Examiner. “Jim Moore, a fourth-generation rancher, said it costs him $2,000 now to fill up his three tractors. A president who made much of his support from the farming community, he said, had forgotten his friends when they needed him.”

The most right-wing county in Texas is shifting


Texas Gov Greg Abbott addresses former U.S. President Donald Trump in Weslaco, Texas, U.S. June 30, 2021. Brandon Bell / Pool via REUTERS

October 01, 2026 
ALTERNET

The right wing can't stop the changes in Texas.

Houston Chronicle journalist and columnist Chris Tomlinson reported on Thursday that Fort Worth, Texas, isn't what it once was — and those changes likely won't end with the 2026 midterm election.

Tomlinson spoke to Republican state Senate candidate Leigh Wambsganss, who once said that she wasn't merely a MAGA Republican but she was “Ultra-MAGA." Like Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), however, she began scrubbing President Donald Trump from her website. In fact, she's removing the word "Republican" too.

"The once bright red color is now dark blue," said Tomlinson.

"Wambsganss made her name as political director for Patriot Mobile, a Christian nationalist wireless provider that backed fundamentalists in school board elections," the Chronicle reported. "She was once considered a shoo-in on the party’s conservative fringe, where Fort Worth politicians have traditionally done well."


That has changed significantly. Wambsganss previously lost the seat to Democrat Taylor Rehmet in a Feb. 2026 special election.

The report said the state is experiencing one of the biggest political shifts since 1820. Demographics are changing, economics are changing and with it the social shifts and politics come with it.

Now, Wambsganss' campaign is looking a lot like Rehmet's.


"Her strategy of running away from her past begs the question: Are voters leaving the Republican Party, or is President Donald Trump’s Republican Party leaving them?

The important part to know about the Fort Worth area is that it wasn't along ago that "white men chased Black Union soldiers from a polling station in Falls County," Tomlinson recalled from a story his great-grandfather told him. His grandfather was a member of the Dallas Klan, believing that "God intended for them to rule the world." The Klan controlled both Dallas and Forth Worth.

In all of Texas' 254 counties, "Fort Worth and Tarrant County have always leaned hardest to the right," the reporter explained.


Rehmet told him, “They've lost a lot of folks in the middle. We can talk here all day about Republican-Democrat, but most people are just regular working folks. They don't have the luxury to really be super politically active. They're working two jobs. They're taking care of their kids. And those are the folks that I think of whenever I'm ready to go serve, because that's the majority of this district.”

Tony Ortiz, the publisher of the right-wing daily newspaper Current Revolt, said that a lot of this comes down to immigration and the harsh policies from the Republicans to remove anyone who may look like an immigrant, regardless of whether they are criminals, documented or not. It isn't isolated to Latinos either; he said that those in North Texas are worried about "South Asians and Muslims."

The Tarrant County diversity shift began in 2015, though whites still dominate the county's population.

“A lot of this is like a sudden realization of an entire demographic realizing that they are becoming the minority,” Ortiz said. “You blink and you’ve got all of these temples and restaurants and mosques and different driving habits and different languages, and you think, ‘Whoa, what happened?’”



“You think, ‘I need to do something,’ but you’re a little late in doing something. You should have been doing something maybe five, seven or eight years ago,” he explained.


Ortiz identifies as "brown," and accepts his Mexican American heritage.

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance are set to appear in the state this week, where they will celebrate all of the work they've done on "the economy," another report from the Houston Chronicle said.
'Post-MAGA era' is here as big business breaks with Trump: Nobel economist


US President Donald Trump attends a Hispanic Heritage Month reception in the East Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, September 30, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
October 01, 2026  
ALTERNET


There are major signs that big business is breaking with President Donald Trump over the chaos sown by his agenda. This is according to Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, who explained on Thursday why the actions of one of the country’s most prominent financial figures suggest that the “post-MAGA era” is here.

“On September 28th, Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, one of the most prominent, most successful financial figures in the United States, published an article in the Wall Street Journal titled, ‘The Hell with Trump, Let’s Go Back to Globalism,’” said Krugman. “Okay, that’s a lie. That wasn’t what the article was titled, but it was, in effect, what it said. And it was a very interesting message to be coming at this moment in time. I think Dimon’s op-ed can be viewed as a harbinger of a big shift in the business community’s political positions and its attitudes that may be coming in the very near future — in effect a bet that Trump and MAGA in general are going to be in the rearview mirror, not too far from now.”

As Krugman explains, Dimon is an “extraordinarily successful financial leader” and a “very, very smart political operator” who has managed to stay on good terms with administrations from both parties. After the 2024 election, he neither joined the “cavalcade of business leaders rushing to prostrate themselves at Trump’s feet,” nor did he end up on his list of enemies. But now, says Krugman, he’s calling to repair the Western alliance and rebuild ties with Europe to confront the rising power of China, proposing that the best way to achieve that is by forging a free trade agreement between the United States and the European Union.


“That’s quite something,” asserts Krugman. “That’s a very un-MAGA position to take. You want to bear in mind that, first of all, we’re currently under a government of people who do not at all believe in the virtues of free trade. In fact, are extremely hostile to globalism. Certainly don’t believe in binding international agreements. Maybe they want agreements that bind other countries, but not them. And they are also not of the mind that we have a lot of shared values with the democratic governments of Europe. The MAGA position, if anything, is that they like the anti-democratic forces in Europe. J.D. Vance essentially campaigned for Viktor Orban in Hungary. Trump officials have been quite clear that they have sympathy for the AfD in Germany. So if we have common values with some Europeans, the Europeans with whom they have common values are neo-Nazis. And Trump’s de facto support for Putin in his invasion of Ukraine has been alarmingly clear over the past two years.” But now Dimon is rejecting that, and Krugman argues that it suggests he believes Trump and MAGA are on their way out.

According to Krugman, the economic benefits of Dimon’s free trade idea are actually not all that drastic. Europe only exports roughly three percent of its production to the US, and before Trump’s second term, the two entities were practically on a free trade basis anyways. But in Krugman’s estimation, “Dimon believes that the process of negotiating towards a free trade agreement would in itself help to improve politics. That it would be a signal that the ultra-nationalist, anti-democratic, often anti-European policies of theTrump era are behind us. So he’s looking forward to the day when we can start to try to repair some of the immense damage that has been done to our international relations during the Trump years.” With the writing on the wall for the Republican midterms, Dimon thinks the time for “rebuilding an alliance” is near. “He thinks that this is possible,” concludes Krugman, “and that it’s worth positioning himself and his institution for a post-MAGA era.”
Nobel economist lays out ‘really bad news’ for Trump before midterms


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Republican National Midterm Convention in Dallas, Texas, U.S., September 9, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucc

October 02, 2026 
ALTERNET


Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman says a combination of sour economic sentiment, the worsening job market, and higher borrowing costs amounts to “really, really bad news” for President Donald Trump and Republicans heading into the midterm elections.

Writing Thursday on his Substack, Krugman argued that the White House is trying to sell Americans on an economic picture that increasingly conflicts with how voters say they are doing. He pointed to the latest AP-NORC poll, which found 74 percent of adults described the national economy as poor, compared with 26 percent who called it good.

The same poll showed brutal numbers for Trump, who campaigned on economic prosperity for everyday Americans. Just 26 percent approved of his handling of the economy, while 73 percent disapproved. On the cost of living, 17 percent approved of Trump’s performance and 82 percent disapproved. The survey of 2,140 adults was conducted Sept. 24-28 and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points.


Krugman also highlighted a change in how Americans view the economy close to home. During the Biden administration, he wrote, “Americans generally had a much more positive view of their local economy — which they could observe with their own eyes — than they did of the national economy.”

The September AP-NORC survey found 61 percent of adults said the national economy was worse off than when Trump took office in 2025, while 23 percent said it was better. Fifty-five percent said their local economy was worse off, compared with 20 percent who said it was better.


Krugman’s second warning sign was the labor market with official employment measures remain relatively strong by historical standards, but he noted that Americans’ perception of job availability has deteriorated.

The Conference Board reported this week that 23.6 percent of consumers said jobs were plentiful in September, down from 24.5 percent in August. At the same time, 21.9 percent said jobs were hard to get, up from 20.3 percent. Consumer confidence fell for a third consecutive month.

Housing costs add another problem, with the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage jumping to 7.28 percent this week, according to Freddie Mac, its highest level since November 2023 and the biggest weekly increase in four years.


Krugman pointed out the “troubled environment” based on those numbers, go against the administration's characterization of the country as being in a Golden Age.

“And while I’m not a political consultant, I don’t think ‘Who are you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?’ is a winning strategy,” he wrote.

With a month remaining before the midterms, Krugman said the economic environment matters as much as political polling. Although some headline economic statistics remain solid, he argued that voters’ experience with prices, housing costs and the job market is moving in the opposite direction from the White House’s message.
Trump’s 'so-called businessman' myth in ruins as he wrecks economy: experts


US President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House on the South Lawn in Washington, DC, US, September 26, 2026. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon
September 28, 2026 
ALTERNET


In 2024, President Donald Trump was elected largely because voters hoped his background in business would equip him to help bring down prices. But by September of 2026, writes the New Republic editor Michael Tomasky, the myth of “so-called businessman” Trump’s financial acumen has been destroyed as a growing number of experts admit that his policies have a recession on the way.

“About once a month,” explains Tomasky, “I go to Google News and type in the single word ‘recession’ just to see what comes up. Most of the time, the headlines are reassuring: ‘Despite downturn, experts don’t see recession coming’ — that sort of thing. Sunday, the headlines read a little differently. ‘Is the World Staring at a Big Stock Market Crash — and Recession? 5 Uneasy Signs.’ ‘The Fed Just Raised Interest Rates. Recession Is Next.’ ‘Billionaire investor Leon Cooperman sees a recession in 2027 and a stock drop ahead.’ ‘Legendary economist Gary Shilling says consumer signals point to a recession in the next 12 months.’ And so on.” While many factors can contribute to a recession, according to Tomasky, the driving force behind the current economic decline is obvious: the whole thing has been caused by Trump.

“Every decision he makes is the wrong one and makes the situation worse,” writes Tomasky. “Take the tariffs. The Tax Foundation keeps track of the economic impact of the tariffs Trump promised would ‘liberate’ us. Short answer? They’ve been a disaster. They increased taxes on the average American household by $1,000 in 2025, will reduce long-run gross domestic product by 0.4 percent, and more.” Then there’s the war with Iran, which has wrought wide-ranging economic damage. Even so, Trump has just rejected Iran’s latest offer for negotiations and to end the war within seven days, apparently because he thinks he can secure a better deal.

According to Tomasky, the list of Trump’s economic missteps goes on, but it all comes down to one thing: “Trump is wrecking the economy. And he’s wrecking the economy for the same reason that most Republican presidents wreck the economy.” As Tomasky explains, ever since the GOP began emphasizing unregulated markets in the 1970s, Republican presidents have consistently presided over “economic calamities,” with five of six seeing the economy crumble under their watch. According to Tomasky, “It’s not a coincidence that the last five recessions, and seven of the last eight, have happened under Republican presidents.”

“The reason is that they believe in economic nostrums that are either lies or fairy tales,” asserts Tomasky. “Lie: that lower taxes can produce revenues equal to or even greater than higher taxes. Fairy tale: that the unregulated free market will unfailingly find solutions to society’s problems. As we’re seeing right now with cryptocurrencies and AI, the unregulated free market of the sort we have in this country now creates more problems than it solves.”

While Trump’s previous term saw one such economic calamity, it was caused in large part by pandemic pressures beyond his control. But as experts are once again warning that recession looms, this time, concludes Tomasky, “it will be entirely on him. He may have driven the country into the ditch, but at least he will have exploded the ‘we need a businessman’ myth.”
Anxiety reaches fever pitch as Wall Street sours on Trump economy


REUTERS Jonathan Ernst
September 29, 2026
ALTERNET

Bloomberg reports analysts and investors alike are finally wising up to President Donald Trump’s up-and-down roller coaster of oil prices, and they’re finally settling in for a long-term slog with Trump in the White House.

“The conflict in the Middle East and the implications for forward inflation remain the primary macro narrative and are likely to dictate price action in US rates for the foreseeable future,” BMO Capital Markets’ Ian Lyngen told Bloomberg as a Tuesday drop in oil prices failed to keep stocks and bonds from sliding into an ugly drop.

Previously, Wall Street investors had rallied whenever Trump announced progress in ending his unilateral war on Iran — which has bottlenecked global oil supplies and driven up prices on the international market. But Tuesday drop in oil prices “did little to allay Wall Street’s concerns that still-elevated energy costs could fuel inflation and spur Federal Reserve rate hikes,” according to Bloomberg.


This means Trump’s magic button for temporarily manipulating stock markets with unreliable claims of peace now appears to be failing. Bloomberg reports the dollar rose and Brent crude dropped below $103 a barrel as the Trump administration ordered another release of oil from emergency reserves amid a stalemate in US-Iran talks — but to no avail with investors.

“In economic news, US job openings fell to a five-month low, suggesting employers grew more cautious about expanding their workforces toward the end of the summer, while layoffs remained subdued,” reported Bloomberg. “Consumer confidence dropped to the lowest level since 2014,”

eToro’s Bret Kenwell told Bloomberg that the latest labor-market data reinforces the “low-hire, low-fire” backdrop that has taken hold of the nation, and he added that lagging consumer-confidence “should not come as a surprise.”

“Sentiment now sits at multi-year lows as persistent inflation and higher costs weigh on households,” Kenwell said. “The question becomes whether we’ll see this materialize into weaker consumer spending — a question that earnings season will help answer.”

But in the meantime, Bloomberg reports market worries sent Treasury 30-year yields to the highest level since 2002. Most companies in the S&P 500 fell, with the gauge posting back-to-back losses.

The year 2002, notably, was marked as a terrible time for the U.S. economy with former President George W. Bush’s onerous tax cuts raiding federal coffers and Bush’s disastrous war in Iraq devastating budgets and consumer confidence.
D.E.I.

Trump targets the 60-year 'Star Trek' legacy that built modern NASA


Screenshot/Desilu-Paramount Television
September 08, 2026 

“Star Trek” began as a television series but grew into a cultural phenomenon.


When it premiered in 1966, no one could have predicted that it would lead to more than a dozen spinoff shows, more than a dozen movies and one of the most enduring fandoms in popular culture.

“Star Trek” is also unusual for its close connections to NASA, both in its storylines and in the real world. Decades of “Star Trek” adventures have ignited a love of spaceflight across generations, inspiring many who now work as space professionals.

I’m a cultural anthropologist who studies why people work in space exploration. I’ve interviewed astronomers, engineers, flight surgeons and astronauts. Although I focus more on science fact than science fiction, I’ve noticed in my interviews how much the two threads intertwine.

Because of this, I found myself at a “Star Trek” convention in early August 2026, just ahead of the show’s 60th anniversary on Sept. 8. The convention participants included people of widely different ages, appearances and identities. I was struck by just how much those gathered reflected the series’ values.
When NASA met Star Trek

In the original series, the show’s creator, Gene Roddenberry, came up with a philosophy held by the Vulcan people. He called it IDIC: infinite diversity in infinite combinations. It suggests that an ideal society is made up of many different types, all working together.

It represented Roddenberry’s rejection of conformity. It also explained why the Enterprise crew included a Russian alongside Americans, and Black, Japanese and female characters all in positions of responsibility and authority. While many ordinary viewers absorbed “Star Trek’s” lessons of camaraderie and acceptance, those involved in real space exploration also took notice

. 
The cast of ‘Star Trek: The Original Series’
 included a diverse crew of characters. Walters Art Museum

Roddenberry established relationships with NASA personnel in the early days of his series. NASA provided photographs of planetary bodies and advice about the realities of spaceflight, as well as stock footage and access to certain NASA facilities.

Leonard Nimoy, who played the popular character Mr. Spock, was even brought to the National Space Club’s Goddard Memorial Dinner in 1967 as a special guest. Then-Vice President Hubert Humphrey gave the keynote speech. Afterward, though, it was Nimoy, not Humphrey, who found himself surrounded by the club’s members, including NASA employees, aerospace engineers, members of the military and government officials, all eager to meet the actor portraying the starship Enterprise’s first officer.

The relationship between NASA and “Star Trek” benefited the show by legitimizing the series. It also helped NASA by publicizing its work and depicting a positive future where its efforts to land on the Moon would eventually lead to visits to distant worlds – and amazing scientific advances like the show’s transporter and warp drive.

The connection between the space show and space agency was reflected in NASA’s decision to name its first space shuttle Enterprise, after some encouragement from the “Star Trek” fan community.
Inspiring astronauts

In 1977, actress Nichelle Nichols, who portrayed communications officer Uhura, was hired to recruit for NASA. The space agency had expanded its pool of astronauts to include scientists and other “mission specialists.” For the first time, an astronaut no longer needed to be a pilot to participate in a space mission.

NASA selected its first Black astronaut candidates and its first female astronaut candidates in 1978. While this move toward inclusivity may not have been directly influenced by infinite diversity in infinite combinations, it was compatible with it. “Star Trek” inspired many of NASA’s future employees. In interviews for my book “The Ultraview Effect,” a quarter of the space professionals I spoke with mentioned “Star Trek” as an influence.

 
Nichelle Nichols sits in the space shuttle simulator at the Johnson Space Center in March 1977. NASA

An Apollo astronaut I interviewed, for instance, said he believed humans would eventually “be able to go anywhere in the universe, just like ‘Star Trek.’”

A young engineer who had grown up in the 1990s told me his motivation came from the “opening line of ‘Star Trek’… to explore strange new worlds.”

A space shuttle mission specialist emphasized Roddenberry’s decision to make the starship crew multicultural, explaining: “Today I look at the diversity of it … he was setting the stage back when it wasn’t acceptable [in order] to be acceptable!”
A changing future

That influence has accompanied a changing astronaut corps.

Both the 2025 astronaut class, which for the first time included more women than men, and the crew of Artemis II, which sent the first woman, first Black astronaut and first Canadian on a lunar mission, resemble the future that “Star Trek” imagined.

The “Star Trek” fans at the convention I attended were even more diverse. It was clear to me that Roddenberry’s “infinite diversity in infinite combinations” isn’t just a concept from the series, but something that has become a defining value of contemporary Trek fandom.

NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope captured a region of the galaxy that looks a little like the USS Enterprise, which NASA highlighted in a news release in 2016. NASA/JPL-Caltech

One such fan, Bjo Trimble, holds special status. She is credited with “saving ‘Star Trek’” when the series was almost canceled in 1968 after two seasons. Wearing a rainbow “IDIC” pin, she signed autographs at the SyFy Sistas booth, where T-shirts featuring Black “Star Trek” icons such as Uhura and Benjamin Sisko were on display.

However, with the Trump administration’s recent orders to dismantle all of NASA’s diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility programs and policies, institutional support for “Star Trek’s” vision of acceptance and inclusivity, which flourishes in its fan base, is being undone. This rollback occurred just as NASA’s crews were reaching new milestones in representing the diverse future that “Star Trek” has encouraged for decades.

Sixty years later, some of the diverse future that “Star Trek” imagined has become part of everyday spaceflight. Other parts of that ideal remain unfinished.

Deana L. Weibel, Professor of Anthropology, Grand Valley State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Left Behind: Trump is abandoning the evangelical base that elected him


(Official White House Photo)
September 29, 2026
ALTERNET


President Donald Trump long relied on evangelicals and other religious Christians to power his presidential campaign. Now, according to a recent report by The Bulwark, these same devout individuals are finding that Trump is abandoning their political interests.

"One of the major subplots in American politics over the past half-decade is evangelical Christians—the political constituency without which Trump would have never been elected president—becoming the dog that caught the car," wrote The Bulwark's Joe Perticone on Tuesday. "They just haven’t had much reason to go to the polls since June 2022, when the Supreme Court overturned the legal right to an abortion in its landmark Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision."

Perticone added, "The Family Research Council’s Pray Vote Stand Summit was once a marquee political gathering for evangelicals and their allies in politics. But at this year’s event in Leesburg, Virginia, decline was evident everywhere, from the downsized venue far outside the Beltway to the sparse attendance and general lack of interest from elected officials. When the organization’s leader, Tony Perkins, addressed the audience, it became clear that he has been relegated to the D.C. sidelines after enjoying years of high-contact play as a leader in the anti-abortion movement."


The reporter added that Tony Perkins, who leads the Family Research Council, has called out Trump as well as a Democrat they more traditionally oppose, former President Joe Biden.

"Throughout the event, he expressed frustration with the Trump administration for a lack of interest in addressing abortion rates, and with Congress for claiming to be pro-life while showing little follow-through," Perticone observed. He quoted Perkins as saying that "we’re fighting for this life issue that many people thought was solved in 2022 when the Court overturned Roe, but it’s more of a battle today than it was then,” continuing that conservatives “have an administration that’s not as committed to it as we’ve seen before.”


Perticone also detailed how several prominent Republicans have snubbed the once-hot ticket of going to the Family Research Council events.

"House Speaker Mike Johnson moved from confirmed speaker, to no longer on the roster, to appearing via Zoom on the final day," Perticone wrote. "Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.), and Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) all appeared on the confirmed speakers list at one point or another, but none was on the final roster. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who is struggling through a surprisingly tight race this November (ironically, facing a Democratic nominee who pastors a megachurch), also dropped off the confirmed speakers list at some point this summer."

While the Christian right today is rife with anti-Semitism, racism and misogyny, there are also individuals within the movement who criticize Trump for his intolerance. For example, earlier in September MAGA loyalist Tim Moore wrote an editorial for Washington Examiner arguing that Trump's anti-immigrant agenda is abandoning persecuted Christians in non-white countries.


"There’s one confusing inconsistency in Trump’s defense of Christians, though, and as a stalwart supporter, I fear he may be listening to some bad advice on this theme that could significantly depress evangelical turnout in November," Moore wrote.


After pointing out that Biden had welcomes 29,478 Christian refugees from 50 countries during his term, in 2026 Trump had invited none.

"Countries like Afghanistan, Burma, Iran, and the Democratic Republic of Congo," Moore wrote, saying that among the 50 countries on the Watch list roughly 388 million people are persecuted for their religious beliefs.


"And hundreds of thousands were newly forced to flee their homes because of religious persecution," he added.

Fundamentalist legal group dives into church fight with Native Americans


An evangelical megachurch in 2019 (Wikimedia Creative Commons)

September 24, 2026
ALTERNET 


Founded in 1989 during George H.W. Bush's presidency, the Christian fundamentalist legal group Liberty Counsel has a long history of representing white evangelicals in far-right causes. The Florida-based nonprofit has a new client: Foundations for Nations, a Wyoming church being asked to leave a Native American reservation. And Liberty Counsel is representing the church on a pro bono basis.

According to WyoFile reporter Maya Shimizu Harris, Foundations for Nations is "facing demands to leave the Wind River Indian Reservation after its pastor delivered a sermon urging Native congregants to renounce Northern Arapaho traditions has a formidable ally in its corner as tensions continue to simmer."

"Last month," Harris explains, "the Foundations for Nations church lodged a complaint with state and federal agencies against the Food Bank of Wyoming, alleging the organization unlawfully cut off its support on the basis of religious, political and racial discrimination. According to Foundations For Nations Pastor Sarah Lucas, Food Bank of Wyoming ended the partnership after her controversial sermon, telling her that it was in response to a call claiming her message was discriminatory, the Ranger reported."

Liberty Counsel, Harris reports, "filed the complaint on the church's behalf" and "is providing legal services to the church for free."

Richard Mast, senior litigation counsel for Liberty Counsel, is claiming that Foundations For Nations' situation is a free speech/freedom of religion battle.

Mast told WyoFile, "When a matter arises in their local area, we reach out to them, offer them an opportunity to participate, and we are frequently taken up on that. We appreciate our local counsel in Wyoming … People have reached out to us from Wyoming. We've come to their assistance, and at least one of those cases I recall was successful."

Over the years, Liberty Counsel has repeatedly clashed with liberal and progressive attorneys — many times, in cases involving gay rights and abortion.

"In addition to filing the discrimination complaint," Harris notes, "Liberty Counsel sent a letter to Northern Arapaho Business Council Chairman Keenan Groesbeck in July after the council had adopted a resolution stating that outside organizations should consult with the council before initiating or expanding recurring organized activities on lands governed by the Northern Arapaho Tribe. While stating that the church believes it's in compliance with the resolution, the letter asserted that the church 'requires no authorization' from the Northern Arapaho Business Council 'to conduct religious activities on its own private fee simple property,' and that the church 'will not be leaving its property.'"

Harris continues, "Following Lucas' sermon, the Northern Arapaho Business Council told church officials to leave the reservation, and some called on the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone tribes to use the 'bad men' clause in their treaties with the U.S. government to oust the church from the reservation. But in an August 31 resolution, the Northern Arapaho Business Council stated that it doesn’t regulate activities on the church’s private property, and that it hadn't designated the church or any person as 'bad men.'"
More Americans are becoming liberal —and it’s not for the reason you think


REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz
September 29, 2026
ALTERNET

President Donald Trump's policies, which in some respects have broken from traditional Republican doctrine, have reportedly pushed many Americans to the left — and caused Republicans to become far angrier than other political groups.

This is the conclusion that was reached in a study published by the journal American Politics Research earlier this year and first covered by mainstream media on Tuesday. Noting that Americans often become more liberal during Republican presidencies and more conservative during Democratic presidencies, the researchers found that this trend continued during President Donald Trump's first term but then persisted during President Joe Biden's administration.

Additionally, the study found that "the long-term increase in affective partisanship was given a further jolt with Trump’s election and presidency, with Republican in particular showing a noticeable increase in partisan animosity. This further short-term increase in affective partisanship is associated with the increases in partisan differences on some issues."


"The research was conducted by Alan Yang, a senior lecturer at the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, and Robert Y. Shapiro, a professor in Columbia’s Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs," reported PsyPost journalist Eric W. Dolan on Tuesday. He added that Yang and Shapiro told him that “we were interested in whether the election of an ‘untraditional’ Republican president in 2016 may have upended or accelerated past patterns of opinion change, partisan divergence, and ‘affective partisanship.'”

Per Dolan, "To explore these questions, the researchers analyzed data from the 2016-2020 American National Election Study (ANES) and the 2016-2020 General Social Survey (GSS). Both datasets are uniquely useful because they use panel designs, meaning they surveyed the exact same individuals at multiple points in time. This setup allows researchers to track whether an individual actually changed their answer from one election year to the next."


He continued, "The team examined 32 specific policy questions from the ANES and 40 questions from the GSS. These questions covered a wide range of topics, including government spending, racial equality, immigration, foreign affairs, and social issues like abortion and gay rights. The researchers tracked how responses changed between 2016 and 2020 across the entire sample and within specific political groups. To measure affective partisanship, the surveys used a feeling thermometer scale. Respondents were asked to rate their feelings toward Democrats and Republicans on a scale from 0 to 100 degrees, with higher numbers indicating warmer, more positive feelings."

Dolan also pointed out that the study's methods, though thorough, were not perfect.

"The relationship between emotional animosity and policy opinions is also highly complex," Dolan explained. "The data shows an association between the two, but untangling which one causes the other is a challenge. People might develop stronger negative feelings toward the opposing party because they disagree on policy, or they might change their policy views because they want to distance themselves from a party they dislike. Both processes likely happen at the same time."

Speaking to AlterNet in August, University of Bristol cognitive scientist Stephan Lewandowsky argued that one reason Trump supporters have become so angry is that the president feeds into their various prejudices.

"There's so much tied up in this," Lewandowsky told AlterNet. "There's latent racism. There's religion. There's the general conservative idea that poor people are — it's their fault, they're just lazy, everybody is responsible for what happens to them… except me, because I'm a farmer, and therefore I'm not lazy, and I've tried everything, and I deserve a subsidy."

Comparing Trump's movement to a cult, cult expert Steven Hassan told AlterNet in August that people can try to ease them out of their views through compassion and respectful dialogue.

"What works best is a warm, respectful, curious, questioning approach: 'Help me step into your shoes,' or 'I'm really curious what you think about this or that,'" Hassan wrote. "Referencing other cults that the person knows — Trump supporters will listen to conversations about Chinese communist brainwashing, and they'll be open to learning about Lifton's model [for helping people reform their ways of thinking]. Many of them who got into Trump through the QAnon psyop are open to hearing about traffickers and pimps, and how they recruit, groom and indoctrinate people to become sex slaves or labor slaves. So what I'm trying to convey is that an indirect approach is the most effective way to help people in the cult of Trump start reality-testing."
Warning US Is ‘Moving Toward a Surveillance State,’ Sanders and AOC Propose Crackdown on Flock Cameras

“AI-powered cameras are keeping track of our every move and weaponizing this data against working people to make record profits,” said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.



A Flock camera is seen on September 14, 2026 in Burbank, California.
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Oct 02, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced legislation on Friday that would crack down on artificial intelligence-powered Flock cameras increasingly used—and abused—by law enforcement agencies across the United States to track and log vehicle data.

Sanders (I-Vt.) said in an interview with The Washington Post, which was first to report on the new legislation, that the US is “moving toward a surveillance state where a handful of giant companies make huge profits by giving the government, by selling to the government, the power to track our every move.”

According to a summary released by Sanders’ office the Ban Flock Act would bar the federal government from using automatic license plate readers (ALPR) or accessing the information that they gather. The legislation would also halt federal grant funding to state and local governments that use ALPRs and allow Americans to “sue the federal government for violation of their rights through the use of automatic license plate readers.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who joined Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) in sponsoring the legislation, said in a statement that the maker of Flock cameras, Flock Safety, is “selling its cameras nationwide, laying the groundwork for a surveillance state while enriching corporate executives.”

“Your right to privacy includes the freedom to move around your community without every move being monitored,” said Merkley. “No one should have this unchecked surveillance power at their fingertips, which is why I’m teaming up with Sen. Sanders to rein in this dangerous technology.”

Ocasio-Cortez warned that “across the country, Big Tech companies like Flock Safety have built a mass surveillance system to harvest Americans’ private and personal data without their consent.”

“AI-powered cameras are keeping track of our every move and weaponizing this data against working people to make record profits. The widespread integration of this technology into American society is unconscionable,” she added. “I am proud to introduce the Ban Flock Act with Sen. Sanders to enforce our constitutional right to privacy and protect Americans from both corporate and government surveillance.”



The new bill comes after President Donald Trump and his FBI director, Kash Patel, defended Flock cameras as useful tools for law enforcement, even as investigations showed significant abuses. One such investigation, published by the libertarian Institute for Justice in August, “identified well over 100 incidents of ALPR abuse, including romantic stalking, wrongful stops and detentions, non-law enforcement use, and other types of misconduct.”

Trump nevertheless told reporters in September that “I sort of like them... because of law enforcement, but some people don’t.”

“They think it’s an infringement,” said of the cameras’ critics. “I like them.”

According to the ACLU, Flock operates more than 120,000 ALPRs nationwide.

“Flock’s ALPR cameras aren’t like your normal traffic cameras,” the group noted. “This surveillance technology records and tracks every car that comes into view, and then an AI algorithm catalogs the make, model, color, license plate number, bumper stickers, and even scratches. This personal information is then uploaded into a nationwide database that any law enforcement agency with a Flock contract can search—with few regulations or oversight on how they use what they find.”

Sanders said in a statement Friday that “at a time of growing concern about the unchecked power of artificial intelligence, Flock is eviscerating the very notion of privacy by installing tens of thousands of cameras in communities across America without their consent.”

“Going to the doctor? Flock knows. Dropping your kid off at school? Flock is tracking you. Flock is always watching,” the senator said. “We cannot allow America to become a surveillance state where a handful of AI oligarchs profit by giving the government the power to track our every movement.”