Saturday, October 17, 2026

 

OU researchers lead creation of NSF-backed grassland ecosystem forecasting center



University of Oklahoma

Xiangming Xiao, Ph.D., and Tim Filley, Ph.D.

image: 

Xiangming Xiao, Ph.D., (left) and Tim Filley, Ph.D., showcase the tools at the University of Oklahoma's Stable Isotope Measurement Facility, located in the Stephenson Research and Technology Center. Directed by Filley, the facility will analyze isotopes of carbon, nitrogen and other elements to track how soils, plants and water are changing across the state's grasslands.

view more 

Credit: University of Oklahoma





NORMAN, Okla. – Across the Earth, about 40% of land is covered by grasslands. These regions support food and economic security worldwide and underpin Oklahoma’s row crop operations, and livestock, transportation and tourism industries. However, they face ongoing changes and threats to their survival. To address these challenges, a team of researchers headquartered at the University of Oklahoma are taking an innovative approach toward advancing grassland conservation and management.

The team has established the Center for Grassland Ecosystem Forecasting (CGEF), led by researchers from the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, the Noble Research Institute and East Central University. Xiangming Xiao, Ph.D., who holds a George Lynn Cross Research Professorship in OU’s School of Biological Sciences, is the project’s principal investigator and the center’s director.

This summer, the U.S. National Science Foundation awarded Xiao’s team with a four-year, $8 million grant to establish the center. The funding is made possible through the NSF’s EPSCoR Research Incubators for STEM Excellence (E-RISE) program, which emphasizes research proposals with a high potential impact in emerging or interdisciplinary research areas.

While grasslands provide essential goods and services to human communities, they are also vulnerable to large spatial-temporal variability driven by weather, such as heatwaves and droughts, as well as fires, cattle grazing, and other human activities. This makes accurately predicting and forecasting grassland ecosystem dynamics a significant challenge.

Timothy Filley, Ph.D., center co-director and professor in OU’s School of Geosciences and Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, said that global food production demands have contributed to the degradation of grasslands. For example, as farming has suppressed the frequency of fires that manage grasslands, there are now more woody plants such as Eastern Redcedar trees that are invading the regions.

“Nearly 140 years of intensive and extensive land use have resulted in severe degradation of Oklahoma’s grassland soils,” said Filley, who is also the director of OU’s Stable Isotope Measurement Facility. “The good news is that we have learned, and in many cases re-learned, what it takes to rebuild and maintain resilient soils.”

“Across the state, regenerative practices are now at the forefront of many land managers’ programs,” Filley added. “The question we’re addressing through the center is, how can science predict the changing condition of grasslands quickly enough to help guide real-world decisions?”

To improve adaptative grassland ecosystem forecasting, which is an underdeveloped field, the CGEF team will establish in-situ multi-scale observatories at OU’s Kessler Atmosphere and Ecological Field Station, where grassland areas have been invaded by Eastern Redcedar tree. They will also operate in-situ observatories with the USDA ARS Oklahoma and Central Plains Agricultural Research Center, in El Reno, Okla., where native tallgrass prairie and pasture co-exist.

At these sites and at partner institutions and ranches, the researchers will collect long-term data of soil, microbes, plant diversity and forage quality, the weather, and the exchange of carbon, nitrogen and water between the lands and the atmosphere. The CGEF will also work to develop a statewide observatory to measure, monitor, report and verify grassland ecosystem dynamics in the state.

The center will combine the updated data, advanced models and artificial intelligence/machine learning to create ranch digital twins. These virtual replicas of grassland ecosystems will let researchers simulate how grasslands respond to different management practices and policies under Oklahoma’s highly variable weather.

Through analyses of simulation results, the researchers and community members will work together to assess the likely impacts of proposed management practices and scenarios on the grasslands they manage. This would help them weight the likely effects of their options, from implementing regenerative grazing practices to controlling woody plant encroachments.

“Many decisions by ranchers require data and information from the past, present and near future.” Xiao said. “Grassland ecosystem forecasting would provide timely and actionable data and information to ranchers and other stakeholders.”

Along with supporting those who work on the grasslands, the CGEF will look to strengthen STEM workforce development and provide valuable experience for undergraduate, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers. The team will also partner with additional stakeholders who steward Oklahoma’s grasslands, including the Oklahoma Conservation Commission, ranchers and tribal nations, to develop and support a community of practice in grassland ecosystem forecasting.

“Oklahoma’s economy is deeply tied to the health of our grasslands,” Filley said. “Our biggest goal is translating complex scientific data into practical, actionable forecasts and tools that ranchers and land managers can use every day. Our partners and practitioners will be essential to that goal.”

Along with external support, the center is fueled by collaboration across OU’s campus. The team will draw on expertise and facility support from the Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy, the Dodge Family College of Arts and Sciences, the College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences and the Office of the Vice President for Research and Partnerships.

Xiao noted that the E-RISE program is structured to provide a second three-year phase of research funding after the first four-year phase, pending the approval of a future follow-up proposal.

“We began to test how you can do this at a very local scale,” said Xiao, who added that the CGEF is built upon work that has been ongoing since 2013. “All of these long-term experiments and observations helped us to build a strong case in this center proposal. We are now ready to tackle this grand challenge across multiple organizational scales from ecosystems to ranches, watersheds, and the state.”

 

International scientists issue 2026 State of the Climate report, finding climate progress amid intensifying risks





American Institute of Biological Sciences






A new report published in the journal BioScience warns that “Earth’s climate system is moving deeper into uncharted territory,” with seven of 16 climate-related planetary vital signs now at record extremes. The study, co-led by Dr. William J. Ripple of Oregon State University and Dr. Christopher Wolf of Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Associates, describes the situation plainly: “We are witnessing the rapid destabilization of the Earth’s climate system. This is no longer a warning for the future; it is a diagnosis of the present.”

The vital signs tracked in the report span greenhouse gas concentrations, temperatures, the oceans, ice, Earth’s energy balance, and wildfire. The authors also track indicators of the human activities driving these changes, including energy use, food production, economic growth, and land-use change. Together, these metrics provide a sweeping view of Earth’s changing climate, as well as its consequences and causes.

The authors report that concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide all reached record levels again in 2026. In May 2026, atmospheric carbon dioxide exceeded 428 parts per million, roughly 50% above pre-industrial levels and generally higher than any time in the last 2 million years. Fossil fuel consumption rose by 0.9% in 2025, with oil, coal, and gas all reaching record highs, and annual energy-related carbon dioxide emissions surpassed 41 gigatons for the first time.

The authors note that the rate of global warming appears to have accelerated, from about 0.05°C per decade between 1880 and 1970 to about 0.36°C per decade between 2010 and 2024. “At current rates, 2°C above pre-industrial levels could be reached before 2050,” they write. According to preliminary data, say the authors, glacier thickness and Greenland ice mass are at record lows, while ocean heat content and sea level are pressing record highs.

The report documents the growing human toll of extreme weather over the past year. In October 2025, Hurricane Melissa caused 95 deaths and more than US$12 billion in damages across the Caribbean; in November 2025, a tropical storm and monsoon rains in Indonesia caused 708 deaths; and in June 2026, a severe heatwave in Europe caused approximately 14,000 deaths, according to a preliminary estimate. “All of these events were at least partly attributable to climate change,” the authors note.

The authors also highlight escalating risks from climate tipping elements, including a weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and increasing vulnerability of the Amazon rainforest, where “the combined effects of warming and deforestation could push it past an irreversible threshold at just 1.5°C–1.9°C of warming.” They caution that “continued warming and interacting feedbacks may increase the risk of a self-reinforcing ‘hothouse’ trajectory characterized by weakening carbon sinks, accelerating ice loss, ecosystem degradation, and additional greenhouse gas release.”

Despite these worrying trends, the report points to encouraging signs of change. Low-carbon sources provided roughly 43% of global electricity generation in 2025, and solar and wind energy consumption grew by approximately 18%. “In 2025, for the first time in more than a century of coal-dominated electricity generation, renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydropower, and other renewables) have surpassed coal globally, marking a potentially historic turning point in the transition toward clean energy,” the authors write. Still, the authors stress that growth in energy demand meant renewable expansion “was insufficient to displace fossil fuel consumption.”

The report argues that cutting emissions remains essential, but it must now be accompanied by rapid adaptation.. The authors highlight “fast-track” measures that reduce near-term risks while delivering co-benefits: “mangrove restoration can offer protection against storm surges while enhancing carbon sequestration; shifts toward plant-based diets can reduce the risk of climate-related food system instability while increasing soil carbon and reducing pressure on biodiversity; and distributed solar can reduce the risk of storm-related grid failure while increasing energy security.”

The authors stress the importance of transformative change and collective action, pointing to the emergence of "positive social tipping points." They note that “even relatively small actions, when multiplied across communities and institutions, can contribute to broader societal change and help strengthen public support for climate mitigation and adaptation efforts.”

Ripple, Wolf, and colleagues emphasize that climate change is also a matter of justice: “the communities least responsible for historical emissions, particularly in the Global South and small island states, are bearing disproportionately severe and early consequences.” Yet they maintain that “the future trajectory of both the climate system and human societies has not yet been fully determined. The decisions made during the coming years will strongly influence whether future generations inherit a planet with an unstable climate system or a more resilient and sustainable world.”

The full report is available in BioScience.

 

Storm Harry: Drifting buoys help improve early forecasts of extreme events in the Mediterranean Sea





CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change





A network of drifting buoys equipped with barometers can help improve weather forecasts of extreme Mediterranean storms by providing crucial atmospheric observations from areas of the sea where measurements are scarce. A new study published in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society provides the first assessment of the impact of these observations during storm Harry, which affected the Mediterranean region in January 2026.

The findings come from the Mediterranean Extreme Events Experiment (M3E), an international initiative co-coordinated by OGS (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale) and CMCC. By combining targeted in-situ observations with numerical modelling, M3E supports the deployment of drifting buoys in the Mediterranean basin to improve forecasts of extreme weather events and advance understanding of ocean–atmosphere interactions during storms.

Storm Harry brought intense rainfall and rough seas to several Mediterranean countries between 18 and 21 January 2026. Over three days, rainfall exceeded 300 millimetres in 23 monitoring locations and 400 millimetres in eight of them. The highest total, 482.5 millimetres, was recorded in eastern Sicily.

The storm also had devastating consequences, with hundreds of migrants estimated to have died while attempting to cross the Mediterranean by sea. On land, the storm triggered heavy landslides, including the major landslide in Niscemi, Sicily, destroying homes and forcing around 1,500 people to evacuate.

Forecasts from the ECMWF successfully predicted the heavy rainfall in southern Italy approximately seven days ahead of the event. However, forecasting precipitation in North Africa proved more challenging, partly because of small, rapidly evolving low-pressure systems that are difficult to capture accurately.

“These systems highlight the importance of collecting observations directly at sea,” says Emanuela Clementi, senior scientist at CMCC and co-author of the study. “The Ionian Sea and central Mediterranean have historically had limited coverage of in-situ atmospheric measurements, despite being areas where intense storms and persistent cyclones can develop.”

M3E addresses this gap through drifting buoys that measure atmospheric pressure and sea surface temperature. The observations are transmitted in near real time and made available to forecasting systems, where they can be incorporated into numerical weather prediction models.

The study shows that atmospheric pressure observations from the M3E buoys had a beneficial impact on forecasts during storm Harry. In particular, data from a buoy in the Ionian Sea contributed to improving the representation of atmospheric circulation as storm Harry crossed the region.

An additional experiment compared forecasts using the available Mediterranean drifting-buoy observations with forecasts in which these observations were withheld. The results showed significant differences in forecast sea-level pressure near the Balearic Islands, close to small low-pressure systems associated with the storm.

“The Mediterranean is a relatively small sea, but it can generate very powerful storms, and the countries around it pay a high price. With M3E we are filling a gap in the observations precisely where these storms form. Storm Harry gave us the first evidence that these data help forecasts. For CMCC it is a natural step, because a better atmospheric forecast also means a better forecast of the sea,” says Clementi.

CMCC contributes to M3E through its coordination role and expertise in ocean forecasting, cyclone dynamics, extreme precipitation and observational systems. The atmospheric forecasts produced by ECMWF provide essential forcing conditions for the CMCC Mediterranean Forecasting System (MedFS), which operates within the Copernicus Marine Service.

Since observations are essential for better understanding and forecasting these processes, CMCC also contributes directly to expanding the observational network by providing and deploying additional drifting buoys, including in the Tyrrhenian Sea, to improve spatial coverage across the Mediterranean Sea.

The buoy observations also offer an opportunity to better understand how the ocean and atmosphere interact during extreme storms. By bringing together in-situ observations, weather forecasting and ocean modelling, M3E promotes an integrated approach supported by a partnership of European and US institutions and endorsed by the World Weather Research Programme (WWRP).

The research identifies small-scale low-pressure systems as a priority for future observational campaigns, as better coverage of these features could help reduce forecast uncertainty and improve understanding of the local impacts of Mediterranean storms.

Building on these initial results, plans are underway to expand the observing network from autumn 2026, with seven drifting buoys acquired by CMCC set to be deployed in the Tyrrhenian Sea, alongside additional deployments in the Ionian Sea. These new observations will strengthen coverage in areas where improved data are particularly important for forecasting extreme events.

 

Read the paper:

Lavers, D. A., et al. (2026). The Mediterranean Extreme Events Experiment and storm Harry in January 2026. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70325

 

A ‘huge leap forward’ for brain injury care in first responders



Consensus reached on approaches to recognition, recovery, return to duty




Ohio State University





COLUMBUS, Ohio – Over 50 experts – clinicians, researchers, policymakers, first responders and representatives from agencies that employ and advocate for them – have reached consensus on the first-ever recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis and management of traumatic brain injury in first responders.

Publishing today (Oct. 16, 2026) in The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, the 52 authors agreed to 28 recommendations designed to help first responders, healthcare professionals and agencies work toward five primary goals: timely recognition of traumatic brain injury (TBI), safe recovery, operational readiness, reduced stigma and first responder-centered care.

Researchers and clinicians at The Ohio State University assembled the team that developed the guidelines, which apply to law enforcement officers, corrections personnel, firefighters and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) – a group of professionals at high risk for violent interactions, falls and car crashes working in a demanding culture that makes it tough to seek help.

While addressing injury prevention, treatment and return to duty, the recommendations also recognize that better outcomes will require education, supportive reporting practices and organizational cultures that enable first responders to identify injuries and access appropriate care. The authors wrote in the paper that management of traumatic brain injuries in first responders “must shift from an individual burden to an organizational responsibility.”

“The first step is recognizing that TBI is a problem in first responders. I think everybody thinks of it as a sports problem, but there are a lot of other populations that TBI impacts, and, clearly, first responders is one of them,” said lead author Jaclyn Caccese, associate professor in the School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences at Ohio State.

“We don’t have to start from scratch. There is a lot we can learn from sports and the military, but those approaches have to be adapted with first responders to reflect the realities of their work. That partnership is really important if we want the recommendations to be practical, trusted and ultimately useful.”

The authors convened at Ohio State last spring to pursue consensus on protocols surrounding six frameworks that they had been discussing in smaller groups for months before they met.

  • workplace policies
  • injury prevention measures
  • challenges of recognizing injuries
  • diagnosis and treatment of the injury
  • mental health monitoring
  • steps needed to get a concussed first responder back to work 

Though concussion research on athletes and military personnel has informed this work, the complex nature of first responders’ responsibilities brings a different set of challenges after a TBI: Symptoms can interfere with duties that require making split-second decisions, while driving at high speed with lights and sirens can provoke symptoms. Shift work disrupts sleep, which is essential to repairing the brain. An additional strike to the head could set back the recovery process.

The recommendations emphasize shared organizational responsibility, supportive and non-punitive reporting and referral processes, clinician-guided care, occupation-specific return to duty progression and continued research partnerships with first responder communities.

Two recently published studies led by Caccese and colleagues provided new details on the size of the problem of TBIs in first responders.

In a statewide survey of Ohio law enforcement and corrections officers, 64.1% of respondents reported at least one lifetime TBI, and 28.3% reported duty-related TBI. Nearly three-quarters of the duty-related injuries had never been diagnosed or treated.

A review of 23 studies of TBI occurrence in first responders showed the prevalence of a lifetime TBI in this population was 58.8%. The research also showed there is a high risk for TBI in firefighters and revealed that head injuries in EMTs have barely been studied at all.

New federal funding will support an investigation into symptoms and recovery timing in first responders. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health awarded Ohio State $1.9 million to fund a project adapting the sideline assessment and repeated testing of injured athletes as closely as possible to the law enforcement environment. Personnel with a head injury will be compared to uninjured controls on a range of symptoms 72 hours after the TBI, once symptoms have resolved, when they’re cleared for unrestricted work and six months later.

“The idea is to look at what are the common mechanisms of injury, how long does it take officers on average to hit those milestones, and what do their trajectories look like?” said Caccese, who is the principal investigator on the grant. “And we’ll also look at the risk factors for persisting symptoms – for officers who do take longer to recover, why do they take longer to recover?”

Many other consensus statement authors are working to shrink the gap of research on TBI in first responders and helping spread the word about the recommendations and the collaborative process that led to them. A major next step is working with first responder organizations to determine how the recommendations can be implemented across different agencies and occupational settings. Caccese and colleagues are presenting the consensus statement at the International Association of Chiefs of Police in late October.

Though there is a lot more work to be done, Caccese said publication of the recommendations is a significant milestone in the effort to build more consistent, evidence-informed systems of TBI care with and for first responders, whose workplace safety and well-being “really affects everyone.”

“A first responder should not have to recognize a TBI alone, decide whether reporting it could threaten a career, find a clinician who understands the demands of the job, negotiate appropriate work restrictions, and determine when it is safe to resume a high-risk duty,” she and colleagues wrote in a preface to the topical issue of the journal. “Yet in many settings, there is no clear system to guide that process. The consensus statement offers a framework for beginning to build one.”

This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs endorsed by the Department of Defense through the Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health Research Program, and by Ohio State’s School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and Center for Brain Injury Recovery & Discovery.

Additional Ohio State co-authors are James Oñate, Nathan Edwards, Andrew Sas, Carly Smith, Thomas Beach, Laura Boxley, Michael Guthrie, Jacek Kolacz, Patrick McKenna, Ashish R. Panchal, Bryant Walrod and Jeffrey J. Wing.

#

Contact: Jaclyn Caccese, Jaclyn.Caccese@osumc.edu

Written by Emily Caldwell, Caldwell.151@osu.edu