Sunday, December 20, 2020

UK
Coronavirus Tier 4: Shocking footage shows rail passengers rushing to leave London St Pancras

 by MICHAEL HOLDEN
20th December 2020
in Network


Credit: Sean Spooner

Footage on social media has shown rail passengers rushing to leave London as Tier 4 was announced yesterday evening.

Tier 4 says that people must not meet other households over the Christmas period and must stay at home.

Harriet Clugston on Twitter shared the below video of passenger queuing to leave London St Pancras.

Harriet said: “As expected, train is crammed. Announcement on tannoy says social distancing “will not be possible” due to volume and to get off if you are not comfortable with that.”

Harriet continued to say that “Every person on this train including myself has made what is probably a very silly and irresponsible decision to travel albeit within the law.”

Transport Secretary, Grant Shapps, has said “It is incredibly important that people follow the guidance, stay at home and do not attempt to travel. Our focus must be stopping the spread of this virus, protecting lives and our NHS.

“If you are in Tier 4, the law means you must stay at home and you cannot stay overnight away from home. Across the rest of the country, you must stay local.

“Follow the guidance and please do not come to a station unless you are permitted to travel. Extra BTP officers are being deployed to ensure only those who need to take essential journeys can travel safely.”

Sir Peter Hendy, Christmas Transport Tsar, has said: “The message is clear – to combat this virus, you must follow the guidance and stay at home.

“At stations we will be deploying extra staff, announcements will make the law clear, and additional BTP officers are in place to ensure that only essential journeys take place.

“People considering driving should also stay at home or stay local. The new restrictions mean that people should not travel into or out of Tier 4 areas, and across the country you should stay local. You should play your part in tackling the spread of this virus.”

Switzerland okays its first vaccine against COVID-19

Swiss regulators say Pfizer/BioNTech gets world's first approval in 'ordinary procedure' for distribution without charge

Peter Kenny |19.12.2020


GENEVA, Switzerland

Swiss regulators said Saturday they have authorized the vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech for COVID-19, the world's first approval for ordinary and not emergency usage.

The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health said vaccinations will be distributed free of charge and are set to start in a few days for vulnerable groups and will expand on Jan. 4.


The vaccine has already been approved for emergency use in Britain, Canada, and the US.

"The safety of patients is an essential prerequisite, especially where the authorization of vaccines is concerned," Swissmedic director Raimund Bruhin, who heads the government regulator, said in a press release.

"Thanks to the rolling procedure and our flexibly organized teams, we nevertheless managed to reach a decision quickly – while also fully satisfying the three most important requirements of safety, efficacy, and quality."

Swissmedic said it meticulously reviewed the available information and concluded that "the COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech is safe and that its benefit outweighs the risks."

2 injections

The announcement came the day after Swiss federal authorities said that restaurants and bars must be closed for a month from Tuesday to help curb the virus' spread but said ski areas could remain open.

There were 4,478 new COVID-19 infections and 120 deaths on Friday, bringing the total fatalities to over 6,000, health authorities announced.

There have been more than 400,000 infections since the pandemic in the country of some 8.6 million people.

Anyone age 16 and up is allowed to get vaccinated against the novel coronavirus.


For optimum protection, Swiss medic suggests two intramuscular injections of the vaccine, spaced at least 21 days apart.

"According to the data assessed by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, the level of protection afforded seven days after the second injection of the vaccine is over 90%," said the statement.

"This represents the world's first authorization in the ordinary procedure."

The federal government has signed contracts for just over 15 million doses of the vaccine.

Besides the 3 million doses from Pfizer/BioNTech, this includes an additional 4.5 million doses from Moderna and up to 5.3 million doses from AstraZeneca.

The vaccines from Moderna and AstraZeneca are still undergoing the approval process at Swissmedic.

"In addition, Switzerland is taking part in the international COVAX Initiative to give economically weaker countries access to vaccines," said the health department. 

Sudan: Police disperses rally near presidential palace
Rallies in several Sudanese cities to observe 2nd anniversary of uprising and removal of Al-Bashir government



By Buhram Abdel-monem
20.12.2020
KHARTOUM, Sudan

The Sudanese security forces on Saturday evening dispersed thousands of protesters who had gathered near the presidential palace, to commemorate the second anniversary of the uprising.

According to eyewitnesses, thousands of Sudanese who had gathered near the presidential palace were holding banners against Abdullah Hamdok's government. They vowed to continue to fight for freedom, justice, and peace – the primary motive of the Sudanese uprising.

So far, no injuries were reported.

Another rally was held near the Sudanese Parliament in Khartoum, where eyewitnesses reported that the security forces fired teargas canisters to disperse the protesters.

The protesters' demands across the Sudanese cities varied between removing the government as they believed it has failed to meet their demands and calling for economic reforms.

In December 2018, Al-Bashir was removed from power by the military after mass protests against his three-decade-long rule.

Later a Sovereignty Council was formed after the Sudanese army and opposition leaders agreed to lead the country for a three-year transitional period.

-Ahmed Asmar contributed to this report from Ankara

Sudan marks 2nd anniversary of uprising

Bashir was removed from power by the military after mass protests against his rule
FILE PHOTO

Talal Ismael |19.12.2020

KHARTOUM, Sudan

Thousands of protesters took to the streets in several cities across Sudan on Saturday to mark the second anniversary of protests that led to the ouster of former President Omar al-Bashir.

Protesters waved banners calling for freedom, justice and peace – which were the main demands of the revolution against the Bashir regime, according to an Anadolu Agency reporter.

They also chanted slogans against the military component in the transitional government, amid calls for scrapping the Transitional Partner Council (TPC), which was recently formed as part of a peace agreement between the government and rebel groups.

Demonstrators also called for accelerating the formation of parliament, bringing those responsible for killing protesters during the anti-Bashir uprising to accountability and the dissolution of the companies owned by the military.

Ahead of the protests, the head of Sudan’s Sovereign Council, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, pledged to protect the gains of the revolution.

"On this anniversary, we renew our pledge that the armed forces will remain the guarantor and protector of the revolution and its gains,” al-Burhan said on Twitter.

Al-Bashir was removed from power by the military after mass protests against his three-decade rule.

*Ahmed Asmar contributed to this report from Ankara


INDIA
Apple puts Wistron on probation after payment delays to workers in Karnataka facility

Apple had sent independent auditors to investigate the incident in which thousands of workers staged violent protests at the Wistron facility in Bengaluru alleging non-payment of dues.

BEFORE

AFTER

A file photo of Wistron employees going on the rampage. 
(Photo | EPS)

By Bismah Malik
Express News Service

BENGALURU: Tech giant, Apple said that it has put its key contract manufacturer, Wistron on probation, stopping further business with the iPhone supplier after a preliminary investigation found that there were payment delays to workers during October and November months and its supplier code violations.

Wistron admitted to lapses at its Narasapura iPhone factory in Bengaluru outskirts which resulted in reduced/delayed payments of salary for some of its workers at the facility. Wistron has also sacked its Vice President, India, Vincent Lee and said that disciplinary action will be taken against the erring officials.

On Thursday, The New Indian Express reported that Apple might temporarily suspend its contract with Wistron over company policies on employment and wages. Apple had last month put another contract supplier, Pegatron in China, on probation after investigations found that there were violations with the engagement of students workers.

“While these investigations are ongoing, our preliminary findings indicate violations of our Supplier Code of Conduct by failing to implement proper working hour management processes. This led to payment delays for some workers in October and November," the tech giant said in a statement.

"As always, our focus is to make sure everyone in our supply chain is protected and treated with dignity and respect.We are very disappointed and are taking immediate steps to address these issues. We have placed Wistron on probation and they wont receive new biz from Apple before they complete corrective actions. Apple employees, auditors, will monitor their progress,” the statement read.

Apple had sent independent auditors to investigate the incident in which thousands of workers staged violent protests at the Wistron facility in Bengaluru alleging non-payment of dues.

The development comes as a big setback to $250 million investment expansion plans of Wistron under the Production linked incentive scheme announced by Narendra Modi government to shift the manufacturing bases of mobile phones and electronics components from China to India.

Wistron said, "This is a new facility and we recognize that we made mistakes as we expanded. Some of the processes we put in place to manage labor agencies and payments need to be strengthened and upgraded. We are taking disciplinary action and steps to correct this. We are removing the Vice President who oversees our business in India."

“Our top priority is to ensure all workers are fully compensated immediately,” the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer added.

Meanwhile, sources said that the Karnataka government, in a written communication to the centre, had blamed Wistron for not being able to pay workers especially for the stretched working hours due to a faulty attendance software which showed discrepancies resulting in lesser salary payment. The letter to union labour ministry also pointed out that the employees were marked absent on some days when they attended work and that the payments didn’t happen in time.


WILDCAT! IWW.ORG


SEE 








INDIA
Vaccine or not, mask is here to stay

Getting a jab may not prevent transmission of virus, 
does not mean people can abandon caution:


For representational purposes (Photo | AP)
By Iffath Fathima
Express News Service

BENGALURU: Given the tragedy and havoc that SARS-CoV-2 has wrought across the world, a vaccine against Covid-19 has almost acquired the halo of a panacea, a cure-all that would restore life as we knew it. Experts however, point out that there is much we still don’t know and that washing hands, wearing masks, and maintaining physical distance will be required even after the immunisation programme begins.

The efficacy of vaccines being developed across the globe ranges between 70-95%, but experts say that getting a shot does not mean that people abandon all caution, not just because the best test for a vaccine’s effectiveness will be in the real world, but also because the immunisation drive would last several months.
“A vaccine only prevents someone from getting symptoms, or protects from developing a serious form of the disease.



There is no guarantee that a vaccinated person will not transmit the virus to another person. There are many asymptomatic people, who have no symptoms but the virus is present in their nasal passage. When they breathe, cough or sneeze, they can still transmit the virus to others,” said Dr Giridhara Babu, epidemiologist and member of the state’s expert committee on Covid.

Dr Babu also said that how long the protection of the vaccine will last is still not known. “(So) we need to continue to take all precaution. Wearing masks will also help prevent respiratory diseases,” he added.

Several vaccines in development are to be administered in two doses which could be several weeks apart. This also affects immunity, said Dr Sunil Kumar K, senior consultant for interventional pulmonology at Aster CMI Hospital. “After the first dose, there is only about 56% efficacy in terms of the virus getting transmitted, and 94% efficacy is achieved only after two months of vaccination. During this period people who have been vaccinated still need to be cautious and are required to continue wearing masks and follow physical distance measures,” he said.


Dr Jagadish Hiremath, medical director at Ace Suhas Multispecialty Hospital said that many variables affect individual immunity and virus transmission. “The vaccine will increase antibodies which will circulate to the nasal mucosa and stand guard there.

But it’s not clear how much of the antibody pool can be mobilised (by the body) or how quickly. If the answer is: ‘not much’, then viruses could bloom in the nose and be sneezed or breathed out to infect others. A lot of people are thinking that once they get vaccinated, they won’t have to wear masks any more. But it’s critical for them to know that they have to keep wearing masks, because they could still be contagious.”
COVID-19: Public urged to switch to reusable face coverings as 102 million masks binned each week

A new UK survey finds that nearly 70% of those who wear disposable masks are unaware they are single-use plastic.


Tuesday 15 December 2020 
Disposable face masks are fueling a huge new plastic pollution problem


People are being urged to switch to reusable face coverings as it has emerged that more than 100 million disposable masks are binned in the UK every week.

Nearly 70% of those who wear disposable masks are unaware they are single-use plastic, research for the North London Waste Authority (NLWA) found.
Sponsored link


And around one in five wrongly believes disposable masks should go in the recycling.

In a bid to tackle the waste emergency, NLWA has launched a new campaign to encourage the nation to switch to reusable face coverings.

It revealed that 102 million single-use face masks are thrown away every week - enough to cover the pitch at Wembley Stadium 232 times over.

People are being urged to switch to reusable face coverings

NLWA chair, Cllr Clyde Loakes, said: "The progress we've all made in reducing our reliance on single-use plastics is at risk of being undone during the pandemic, and disposable facemasks are a major culprit.


"They are not made of paper, they are not recyclable and whether they are binned or littered they will damage the environment."


Face mask littering has become a common sight during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 45% of those surveyed feeling angry when they see masks littered on the ground.

Many masks go uncollected, with 15% saying they would be inclined to pick up other people's litter but are refraining from doing so in case of contamination of the virus.

Steve Oulds, national commercial manager at Biffa Waste Services Ltd, said: "Contamination is one of the biggest challenges we face, and we are now seeing many disposable face masks coming through our facility every day."

He said the materials recovery facility is also dealing with more tissues and wipes than normal, and even COVID-19 test kits.

"None of these items are recyclable and they should go in the general waste bin," he said.

It is not just face masks that are fuelling the single-use plastic problem, as 16% of respondents admitted their use of other single-use plastics has gone up during the pandemic.


Delivery packaging was the top item to have increased in use (15%), followed by takeaway packaging (12%) and supermarket food packaging (12%).


However, more than one in five said while they are concerned about plastic pollution, health is currently more important and they are happy to continue using single-use plastic for now.


OPINION

How Huntington and Fukuyama got the 21st century wrong

A decided turn towards authoritarianism, to offset popular dissent, is arguably becoming a defining feature of politics in Asia, the Middle East, and South America, and indeed in the democratic West, as well.


Howard Brasted
Professor of History and Islamic studies at the University of New England

Shafi Mostofa
Assistant Professor at the University of Dhaka.

19 Dec 2020

ARYAN BRETHERN
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi hugs US President Donald Trump as they give joint statements in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, US, June 26, 2017. [Kevin Lamarque/Reuters]


What is going on in the 21st-century world of international politics? With very few exceptions, national elections are revealing degrees of partisanship and ideological polarisation among voters never seen before. It seems not to be a rare occurrence these days that the losers are either claiming that they are actually the winners or that the results have been rigged by their opponents and can therefore be disregarded.

This is the farcical game outgoing President Donald Trump is currently playing in the United States, despite there being little or no evidence that President-elect Joe Biden and the Democratic party committed the widespread electoral fraud he wildly accuses them of. As Republican Governor Larry Hogan of Maryland has openly lamented, today the US risks being seen as a “banana republic” rather than as the leader of the democratic world.

Despite this, hordes of Republican supporters continue to rally behind the anti-democratic narrative that President Trump continually tweets. As one newspaper article pointed out, the “United” States has become the “Divided” States of America.

If the recent examples of Belarus and Myanmar are anything to go by as well, it would seem that opposition parties have little faith in the mechanism of democratic elections reconciling alienating differences or bringing citizens closer together. Creating divisiveness seems to be the order of the day, even in established democratic countries.

In India, the largest democracy in the world, for example, Prime Minister Narendra Modi secured a second term for his BJP government in 2019 with a campaign that demonised the Muslim minority as enemies. “Divider-in-Chief” was how Time magazine labelled him on one of its front covers.

Everywhere, the volatility of public opinion has confounded the pollsters and seen political scientists searching for explanations.

None of these developments was foreseen by two of the most prominent political scientists – Francis Fukuyama or Samuel P Huntington – in their respective grand theories of how the 21st century would unfold.

Following the ending of the Cold War, Fukuyama confidently predicted in an article titled, The End of History – and later in a book that liberal democracy would sweep through the world as the ultimate form of human government. In his view, the collapse of the Soviet Union meant that communism had failed as the obvious alternative, and political Islam as a political system was never likely to draw more than minority support.

Accordingly, the 21st century would experience, under America’s custodial guidance, the installation of a new world order based on a single global system of democracy, individualism, and free markets.

Although he drew on the same turn of events, the post-cold war world that Huntington conjured up in 1993 was very different. In his Foreign Affairs article titled, The Clash of Civilizations, he argued that international relations would be characterised not by consensus about liberal democracy, but by conflict between entire civilisations, particularly between Islam and the West. Huntington contended that substantial differences in culture and religion would propel the 21st century in the direction of inter-civilisational war. The fault lines between civilisations would specifically become the “battle lines of the future”.

As 2020 draws to an end, however, neither of these grand theories seems to be playing out the way their authors anticipated.

As early as 2006, when American forces were beginning to get bogged down in Afghanistan and Iraq, Fukuyama conceded that “liberal democracy” could not be imposed on people without their consent. By 2020, he was not even sure that “liberal democracy” existed in the US any more. For under Trump, he maintained, the US had become the epitome of “kakistocracy”, a government of the “worst”, not the best kind.

At a first glance, Huntington’s “clash of civilisations” theory may have been looked more successful. The 9/11 tragedy, the recurrent deadly lone-wolf attacks on non-Muslim targets, the ISIL’s (ISIS’s) proclamation of a new caliphate, and the “fault-line” tensions about the hijab and status of Muslim women in Western countries may lead some to think that there is indeed a major clash between the Islamic world and the West. In fact, even though Huntington died in 2008, his thesis has remained the standard reference point for thinking about the future direction of international relations and in just the past two years, it was cited more than 35,000 times on Google Scholar.

But a growing number of scholars (more accurate to say ‘the vast majority of scholars’. When thesis first came out it was roundly derided. It still is though less vehemently.) are simply not convinced that these happenings presage the kind of culturally-based religious conflict that Huntington foresaw breaking out on a cataclysmic. What collectively they take issue with is the reductionist basis of Huntington’s whole thesis. They part company with him over his key assumptions that Islam and the West constitute monolithic civilizations, that differences of religious culture will put them on a direct war footing, and that all Muslims will come to embrace the world order advanced by fundamentalist Islam. Niall Ferguson appears to be the only one prepared to countenance that Huntington’s prophecy could become “a real winner”.

Intra-civilisational fissures have undermined not only Fukuyama’s world system of liberal democracy, but also the cohesiveness of Huntington’s civilisational blocs. The erosion of the very hallmarks of American world order, such as open debate, the rule of law, and accountable government, have gradually devalued the currency of Western democracy, while bitter sectarian conflicts have set back any immediate prospect of a Muslim anti-West coalition forming.

What has arguably overtaken the envisaged ascendancy of “liberal democracy” and the placing of entire civilisations on a war footing has been the globalisation of neoliberal ideology and its concomitant by-product of populist reaction.

Neoliberalism, which nearly all capitalist societies have embraced since the 1980s, has verifiably resulted in the inequitable distribution of national wealth to the few who effectively exercise power and benefit most from the policies they promote. That the large majority of people acquiesces to a situation that ostensibly disadvantages them is due to the pervasiveness of neoliberal ideology and the difficulty of effectively questioning the global system it sustains.

Enter populism, a phenomenon that is changing political landscapes throughout the world, though in different ways. In the West, populism manifests itself as a groundswell of right-wing disaffection with liberal democratic governments and corrupt ruling establishments. Populism of this kind is driven by narratives that identify metropolitan elites and multinational outsiders as virtual enemies of the state.

In South Asia, populism has fed into top-down discourses that identify religious minorities as anti-national impediments to unity and development. In both Modi’s India and Mahinda Rajapaksa’s Sri Lanka, Muslims have been instrumentally targeted to garner populist support for policies that blunt opposition to their regimes and weaken constitutional checks on their use of power.

In Muslim Pakistan and Bangladesh, the omnipresence of India in their neighbourhood has always fed into populist narratives about the Hindu other and the role their respective armies play as the symbolic bulwarks of Islam.

While Huntington has been credited with incorporating a populist dimension into his “clash of civilization” thesis, he did not foresee that the trajectory populism might take would just as likely foment intra-state tensions as heighten inter-civilisational antagonisms.

A decided turn towards authoritarianism, to offset popular dissent, is arguably becoming a defining feature of politics in Asia, the Middle East, and South America, and indeed in the democratic West, as well. A political scientist looking into the crystal ball today might well project the remainder of the 21st century not in terms of looming civilizational war, but of increasing civil unrest.

The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.


Howard Brasted
Professor of History and Islamic studies at the University of New England
Dr Howard Brasted is the Professor of History and Islamic studies at the University of New England, Australia.


Shafi Mostofa
Assistant Professor at the University of Dhaka.
Dr Shafi Md Mostofa is an Assistant Professor of World Religions and Culture at the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and an Adjunct Lecturer at the University of New England, Australia.

UPDATED
Lebanon police clash with AUB students protesting tuition hikes

Student protesters burn garbage bins outside the American University of Beirut (AUB) in protest against tuition hikes. (@yarazebian via Twitter)

AFP Saturday 19 December 2020


Lebanese riot police on Saturday scuffled with students protesting a decision by top universities to adopt a new dollar exchange rate to price tuition – equivalent to a major fee hike.

Near the entrance of the American University of Beirut (AUB) in the city’s Hamra district, security forces fired tear gas to disperse protesters who were trying to approach the main gate.

Students responded by throwing water bottles and other objects at riot police blocking their path.

It was not immediately clear if there were any injuries.

The protest came in response to a decision by AUB and the Lebanese American University (LAU), another top private institution, to price tuition based on an exchange rate of 3,900 Lebanese pounds to the dollar.

The nosediving currency is still officially pegged at around 1,500 pounds to the greenback.

The move has prompted fears that other universities could follow suit, potentially leading to an exodus of students from private institutions while public universities remain underfunded and overstretched.

Hundreds of students had gathered in Hamra earlier Saturday in a protest they billed a “student day of rage.”


Read more:

AUB students decry tuition doubling after exchange rate scrapped, others to follow

Lebanon’s economy has plunged into a ‘deliberate depression’: World Bank

Bad economy, Beirut blasts push doctors out of Lebanon

Last Update: Saturday, 19 December 2020 KSA


Lebanese students protest tuition hikes, clash with riot police

A tuition pricing decision by top universities has raised the cost of education for many, angering students in Beirut.

  

The decision to essentially raise university tuition fees comes
 as Lebanon's economy suffers and people struggle [File: Aziz Taher/Reuters]

20 Dec 2020



Lebanese riot police on Saturday scuffled with student protesters angered by a decision from top universities to adopt a new dollar exchange rate to price tuition – equivalent to a major fee hike.

Near the entrance of the American University of Beirut (AUB) in the city’s Hamra district, security forces fired tear gas to disperse protesters who tried to approach the main gate.

Students responded by throwing water bottles and other objects at riot police blocking their path.

It was not immediately clear if there were any injuries.

The protest came in response to a decision by AUB and the Lebanese American University (LAU), another top private institution, to price tuition based on an exchange rate of 3,900 Lebanese pounds to the dollar.

The nosediving currency is still officially pegged to Lebanon’s 23-year-old official rate of 1,500 Lebanese pounds per dollar.

The move has prompted fears that other universities could follow suit, potentially leading to an exodus of students from private schools while public universities remain underfunded and overstretched.

At the rally in Hamra, dubbed a “student day of rage”, hundreds of students were joined by older protesters who wanted to show their support for the students’ demands, according to local media reports.

They chanted anti-government slogans and called for affordable education in a country mired in its worst economic crisis since the 1975-1990 civil war.

Some chants described university presidents as “thieves”, accusing them of being government “accomplices against the people”, while others referred to their grievances as “rights, not demands”.

In the evening, some torched dumpsters to block the street and vandalised banks, before security forces pushed them out.

Reports, which Al Jazeera was attempting to verify, said at least one student being arrested.

Over the past year, the Lebanese pound has lost up to 80 percent of its value on the black market, where on Saturday the dollar was selling for at least 8,200 pounds.

Universities have struggled to adapt to the de facto devaluation as prices nationwide soared.

Commercial banks halted dollar transactions and restricted withdrawals of Lebanese pounds, in moves that have starved many of their savings.

According to the United Nations, more than half of Lebanon’s population is now living in poverty.

The country’s deep financial crisis is exacerbated by the COVID pandemic and aftermath of the massive Beirut port blast in August, which wrecked large parts of the city, killing 200 and injuring more than 6,000 people.
SOURCE : AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES
TRUMP KUMGANG GOLF RESORT AND HOTEL 
North Korea to redevelop Mount Kumgang resort
IT WAS HIS RETIREMENT PLAN ALL ALONG
Plan comes a year after Kim Jong Un ordered demolition of South Korean-built buildings at Mount Kumgang tourist complex.
This undated picture released from KCNA on October 23, 2019, 
shows North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspecting the 
Mount Kumgang tourist area
 [File: KCNA via KNS/AFP]

20 Dec 2020

Pyongyang plans to redevelop its flagship Mount Kumgang tourist complex into an international resort, a year after leader Kim Jong Un ordered South Korean-built buildings there demolished, state media reported on Sunday.

The resort – once a prominent symbol of inter-Korean economic cooperation – was built by South Korea’s Hyundai Asan on one of North Korea’s most scenic mountains, drawing hundreds of thousands of Southern visitors.

But last year, Kim condemned the development with South Korea as an eyesore and described facilities there as “shabby” and built like “makeshift tents in a disaster-stricken area or isolation wards”, ordering their removal.

On Sunday, the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported that Kim Tok Hun, North Korea’s premier, stressed “the need to build the tourist area our own way” to turn it into a “cultural resort envied by the whole world”, during his visit to the area.

He also called for pushing ahead to turn the area into a “modern and all-inclusive international tourist” resort, it added.

The Mount Kumgang complex was once one of the two biggest inter-Korean projects, along with the now-shuttered Kaesong Industrial Complex, where Southern companies employed North Korean workers while paying Pyongyang for their services.


But its tours came to an abrupt end in 2008 after a North Korean soldier shot dead a tourist from South Korea who strayed off an approved path, and Seoul suspended travel.

Reclusive North Korea has long wanted to resume the lucrative visits, but they would now violate international sanctions imposed on Pyongyang for its nuclear and ballistic weapons programmes – although South Korea’s President Moon Jae-in has long championed engagement with Pyongyang.

In June, North Korea blew up a liaison office with South Korea on its side of the border – paid for by Seoul – saying it had no interest in talks.

“The Kim regime will struggle to find the resources to redevelop Mt Kumgang and needs outside investment, but is signalling it will downgrade South Korean partners and stakeholders,” said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul.

“By holding Seoul’s hopes for engagement at risk, Kim is pressuring the Moon administration to find ways of resuming financial benefits for the North.”

AL JAZEERA From: The Stream

What’s fueling Afghanistan’s 

meth boom?

On Wednesday, December 9, 2020
Afghanistan, the heroin capital of the world, is rapidly becoming a major producer of another illicit drug, methamphetamine, commonly known as crystal meth.

According to a new report from The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, those involved in Afghanistan’s drug trade recently discovered the mountain shrub ephedra could be used in place of over-the-counter drugs containing ephedrine, a key ingredient in methamphetamine. The report also noted the plant has been used in other parts of the world to create meth but not at the level of production currently seen in Afghanistan.

The discovery is seen as a potential gamechanger for drug traffickers, making meth cheaper, easier to produce and more profitable.

On this episode of The Stream we speak with the lead author of that report about this turning point in Afghanistan’s drug trade, and the consequences, both global and domestic, that come with it.

In this episode of The Stream, we are joined by:
David Mansfield, @mansfieldintinc
Independent Consultant
davidmansfield.org

Mark Colhoun, @UNODC
Afghanistan Representative, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
unodc.org

Muqaddesa Yourish, @YourishM
Country Director, Lapis Communication
www.lapis-communications.com