Saturday, January 21, 2023

Brazil’s right-wing movement persists without Bolsonaro



 Supporters of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro leave their encampment outside army headquarters as military police stand watch in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Jan. 9, 2023, the day after Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in the capital. The capital uprising by Bolsonaro's supporters on Jan. 8, 2023 failed to overthrow democracy, but millions here believe so strongly in Brazilian-style social conservatism that the movement will persist without its namesake, according to academics who study the Bolsonarita movement and members of the movement themselves
(AP Photo/Andre Penner, File)

DAVID BILLER and NATÁLIA SCARABOTTO
Sat, January 21, 2023 at 9:02 AM MST·6 min read

RIO DE JANEIRO (AP) — Brazil’s defeated former president, Jair Bolsonaro, was in Florida this month when his supporters tried — but failed — to overthrow the country’s young democracy. It was a sign that many in Latin America’s largest nation believe so fiercely in his movement that it can persist without its namesake.

Although Bolsonarismo appears disoriented at the moment, the broader trend will endure. That's according to academics who study the movement and participants in the trend themselves, from the far-right radicals who stormed the capital to more ordinary Brazilian social conservatives. Many feel that leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was such a threat to their country that his victory required the military to prevent him from taking office.

Daniel Bressan, 35, traveled 300 miles from the interior of Parana state to join protesters in the capital, Brasilia. He was taken into custody on Jan. 9, the morning after he and thousands of others invaded Congress, the Supreme Court and the presidential palace.

“Bolsonaro brought the spirit of patriotism and family values back to the people, and now we have to unite to keep fighting,” Bressan, who denies vandalizing the buildings, said by phone on Jan. 10 from inside the federal police’s temporary holding center. “From Bolsonaro himself, we don’t expect anything.”


On the campaign trail in 2018, Bolsonaro tapped into outrage sparked by a sprawling corruption investigation into public figures. The seven-term lawmaker cast himself as an outsider to segments of society that felt undeservedly sidelined.

Some quietly shared his taboo nostalgia for the military dictatorship. Bolsonaro, a former army captain, has supported torture and said the regime should have killed even more communists than it did. Other hardcore supporters were drawn to his exaltation of conservative values, his full-throated embrace of Christianity and his push to arm the general public. Bolsonaro became the “symbolic glue” holding these groups together, according to anthropologist Isabela Kalil, coordinator of the Extreme Right Observatory.

“It's more about how supporters mobilize the image of Bolsonaro than about his actions themselves,” said Kalil. “Those images are independent from the figure of Bolsonaro. He controls them partially, but not totally.”

Radicalism deepened at the encampments that mushroomed outside military buildings nationwide after Bolsonaro’s loss, with die-hard backers demanding the army intervene to overturn the closest race since the nation's return to democracy over three decades ago. Bolsonaro had repeatedly characterized Lula as a thief who would plunge the nation into communism.



SIGNING AUTOGRAPHS IN FLORIDA

Bolsonaro has been virtually invisible since the election, surprising many who expected a show of righteous indignation after months casting doubt on electronic voting machines. While he didn’t concede defeat and requested that millions of ballots be annulled, he also refrained from crying fraud.

Two days before Lula's inauguration, Bolsonaro went to Florida. A week after the inauguration, without any apparent signal from Bolsonaro or the military, rioters took action. The horde smashed windows, trashed artworks, sprayed fire extinguishers and firehoses. Into a wooden table in the Supreme Court, someone carved: “Supreme are the people.”

To the limited extent that Bolsonaro commented on the uprising, it was to say that destroying public property was a step over the line. Many of his supporters were left disappointed.

“Trying to distance himself from what happened causes him to lose his link to the base that coordinated these attacks,” said Guilherme Casarões, a political scientist at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, a university and think tank. “The attack in Brasilia was a shot in the foot and weakens Bolsonarismo as a personalist, radical movement, its two fundamental characteristics.”

Bolsonaro’s party had intended for him to be a leading voice in the opposition, yet it remains unclear when he will return from Florida. Back home, several investigations targeting him could strip him of his ability to run for office.

His far-right allies who were elected to office have the opportunity to claim his political spoils for themselves and are vocally defending arrested rioters. Paulo Baía, a sociologist and political scientist at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, said he believes that “the term ‘Bolsonarismo’ will disappear in coming months,” even as the movement continues onward, diluted among other actors.

Unlike Bolsonaro, U.S. President Donald Trump was present on Jan. 6 just before the attack on the Capitol, urging his followers to the building. He has continued defending their behavior since and tried to make support for the election lies that fueled the attack a defining issue in November’s elections. The Republican party underperformed, however, rendering Trump's position within it more precarious than at any time since 2016.

Thomas Carothers, co-director of the Democracy, Conflict and Governance program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the U.S. and Brazilian riots have no true precedents elsewhere and it is hard to predict what will happen next, but they may have marked high points for both their populist inspirations' political power.

“We need to stop thinking about just Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro isn’t the principal leader,” Alberdan Souza, 28, who administers a Telegram channel about geopolitics, said by phone from Juazeiro do Norte in Brazil’s poor northeast, where he said he is the rare schoolteacher to be proudly right-wing. “He is the guy who caused a surge for the right and for the feeling of Brazilian patriotism, but the movement is much bigger than Bolsonaro.”

Radicals have remained engaged on social media, firstly washing their hands of responsibility for the destruction by blaming supposed left-wing infiltrators.

And they continue issuing calls to stay mobilized so the military can act, announcing general strikes and the shutdown of refineries and gasoline stations to grind Brazil to a halt, according to Marie Santini, coordinator of NetLab, a research group at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro that monitors social media. So far, further aggression in the real world has been limited. At least 12 transmission towers were attacked, several of which were toppled, according to the energy regulator.

“It isn't that these calls were successful, but it demonstrates that the coup impetus remains strong," Santini said. “Bolsonaristas show no sign that of stopping anytime soon.”

Three days after the uprising, a supposed “mega-protest to retake power” was ultimately a dud. At Rio de Janeiro's Copacabana beach, police and journalists outnumbered the few demonstrators. It was a stark contrast with the scene in the same spot weeks before the election, with flyovers, paratroopers, warships and Bolsonaro delivering a stump speech to a jubilant crowd in his thrall.

“I lost my joy of living,” demonstrator Léia Marques, 65, said as she wept. Like other Bolsonaro supporters interviewed, Marques fears the crackdown targeting their movement.

Still, she isn’t giving up.

“People are mobilized on social networks and that has a lot of strength," she said through tears. “We will stay strong on the streets.”

___

Associated Press writer Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.

Brazil's army chief fired in aftermath of capital uprising

Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva speaks during the swearing-in ceremony of Tarciana Medeiros, the first woman to preside the Banco do Brasil, one of the country's main public banks, in Brasilia, Brazil, on Jan. 16, 2023. Lula fired Brazil's army chief Saturday, Jan. 21, 2023, amid concerns over threats to the country's democracy following the Jan. 8 uprising in the capital by far-right protesters. 
(AP Photo/Eraldo Peres, File)


CARLA BRIDI
Sat, January 21, 2023

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva fired Brazil's army chief Saturday amid concerns over threats to the country's democracy following the Jan. 8 uprising in the capital by far-right protesters.

The official website of the Brazilian armed forces said Gen. Julio Cesar de Arruda had been removed as head of the army. He was replaced by Gen. Tomás Miguel Ribeiro Paiva, who was head of the Southeast Military Command.

In recent weeks, the military has been targeted by Lula after supporters of former President Jair Bolsonaro stormed through government buildings and destroyed public property. Lula said several times in public that there were definitely people in the army who allowed the rioting to occur.

Rioters who stormed through the Brazilian Congress, the presidential palace and the Supreme Court in Brasilia sought to have the military intervene and overturn Bolsonaro’s loss to Lula in the presidential election.

More than a thousand people were arrested on the day of the riot, which bore strong similarities to the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Congress by mobs who wanted to overturn former President Donald Trump’s election loss.

A Brazilian Supreme Court justice earlier this month authorized adding Bolsonaro in its investigation into who incited the rioting in Brasilia as part of a broader crackdown to hold responsible parties to account.

According to the text of his ruling, Justice Alexandre de Moraes granted the request from the prosecutor-general’s office, which cited a video that Bolsonaro posted on Facebook two days after the riot. The video claimed Lula wasn’t voted into office, but rather was chosen by the Supreme Court and Brazil’s electoral authority.






Brazil police raid governor's house over capital riots



Supporters of Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro demonstrate against President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, in Brasilia

Fri, January 20, 2023 

BRASILIA (Reuters) -Brazil's federal police on Friday raided the house of the suspended governor of Brasilia, Ibaneis Rocha, who is under investigation for failing to prevent the storming of government buildings by supporters of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro.

Rocha was removed from office for 90 days by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes on Jan. 8 hours after the invasion of the Congress, presidential place and Supreme court by a mob that ransacked the buildings. It was the worst attack on state institutions since Brazil's return to democracy in the 1980s.

"The goal is to seek evidence to support the inquiry into the conduct of public authorities who might have failed in their obligation to prevent the violent acts that day in Brasilia," the federal police said in a statement.

The raid targeted Rocha's house and workplaces, police said.

Rocha was not on site during the raid, which was followed by lawyers from his defense team.

"We are absolutely calm, there is nothing to hide. This raid it is unnecessary and fruitless," his lawyer Cleber Lopes said, adding that the governor had no connection to the violence.

The operation drew criticism from lawyers, as Rocha was head of the Brazilian Bar Association before he became governor. They said the could break the confidentiality of his clients.

"This is not a political issue, but one of respect for the rights of lawyers, and of those who need to resort to the practice of law," said Antonio Carlos de Almeida Castro, a lawyer from Lula's Workers Party.

Earlier, the federal police also carried out raids aimed at "identifying people who participated in, funded or fostered" the protests. It included 24 warrants covering five states and the capital Brasilia, it said in a statement.

Police did not disclose the names of those who were targeted by the operation but said they were being investigated for the crimes of "violent abolition of the rule of law, coup d'état, qualified damage, criminal association, incitement, destruction and deterioration of specially protected property". The warrants were ordered by the Supreme Court.

Following news of the operations, Justice Minister Flavio Dino praised police investigations into what he called "crimes against our country by coup-mongers and their allies".

"Democracy has won and will win," said Dino, who serves under leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

Lula narrowly defeated Bolsonaro in an October election. The Brasilia demonstrators were protesting Bolsonaro's loss and calling for a military coup to oust Lula and restore the far-right leader.

(Reporting by Lisandra Paraguassu and Ricardo Brito; writing by Gabriel Araujo; editing by Steven Grattan and Alistair Bell)

Brazil's central bank will act independently, governor says




Thu, January 19, 2023 

BRASILIA (Reuters) - Brazil's central bank will act independently, governor Roberto Campos Neto said Thursday, adding that the formal autonomy status showed resilience and capacity to stabilize markets.

"We are going to act independently and we are going to say that until the end of the mandate," Campos Neto said at an event hosted by the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Appointed by former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, Campos Neto is set to serve through December 2024.

Also on Thursday, Institutional Relations Minister Alexandre Padilha said Brazil's government does not intend to make changes to the central bank, seeking to appease markets after leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva public criticism of the institution.

On Wednesday, Lula criticized the formal independence of the central bank, established by law in 2021. He said the independence was "nonsense" and that the current inflation target hinders economic growth. Lula returned to the subject Thursday morning, questioning the current level of the country's interest rates after the central bank's 12 consecutive rate hikes to battle inflation.

Campos Neto said that, in his view, the president meant that the central bank can be autonomous without this being formalized in law.

Speaking about the country's high real interest rate, discounting inflation, Campos Neto said he believed that inflation would be around 9% if not for tax cuts promoted by the government last year.

Policymakers paused in September an aggressive tightening cycle that lifted rates to 13.75% from a 2% record low in March 2021. Inflation hit 5.79% in the 12 months to December.

Campos Neto said Brazilians have vivid memories of inflation, and highlighted that a country perceived by investors as riskier must offer more return.

After Bolsonaro supporters invaded and defaced the country's Congress, presidential palace and Supreme Court on Jan. 8, Campos Neto said the central bank strongly condemns the attacks, adding they affect the country's credibility.

(Reporting by Marcela Ayres; Editing by Chris Reese and David Gregorio)
Kerala: India minister's tiger cull comment sparks row

Imran Qureshi - BBC Hindi
Thu, January 19, 2023 

India is home to more than 70% of the world's tigers

An Indian state minister's comments on culling tigers has sparked a debate on conservation.

AK Saseendran, wildlife minister in Kerala, was reported as saying that his government may consider solutions including sterilisation or culling to check tiger numbers in the state.

He was speaking amid outrage over the death of a farmer in a tiger attack.

The minister later told the BBC he only repeated a suggestion from locals regarding culling tigers.

By then, his comments had set off a discussion on wildlife conservation, with several experts expressing outrage and pointing out that culling was a "legally untenable" suggestion.


India is home to more than 70% of the world's tigers - according to the most recent government estimate, the numbers stand at 2,976. But their habitats haven't expanded at the same rate, forcing so-called "surplus" tigers to move outside protected reserves and come in conflict with humans.

A federal wildlife protection law, implemented in 1972, makes it virtually illegal to kill or capture tigers - designated India's national animal - even when they are involved in such conflicts.

India's tiger killings: A success story gone wrong?

The problem with India's man-eating tigers

The attack in Kerala took place on 13 January in the Mananthavady forest range in Wayanad district. The victim, 50, sustained serious injuries to his hands and legs and died of a cardiac arrest while being transferred from one hospital to another. A medical report said that his wounds had caused "excessive bleeding".

After his death, angry locals protested against forest officials and demanded that the tiger be killed.

Local media reported that Mr Saseendran had mooted culling as a possible solution to the issue.

But the minister told the BBC that the suggestion on culling came from locals who had attended a meeting with all the political parties to discuss a way out.

"We have to find a solution to control the animals... I am not in a hurry to cull," he said.

Dr Ullas Karanth, a conservationist and tiger expert, told the BBC that over the past 50 years, the population of tigers had only increased by a thousand, far less than capacity.

"So the suggestion to cull tigers to reduce their numbers is not a sound idea," he says.

Praveen Bhargav, a former member of the National Board for Wildlife, said that a recently amended section of the national Wildlife Act does not permit declaration of tigers "as vermin".

"The proposal of the forest minister is legally not tenable," Bhargav said.

There is, however, a provision in the law "in case of serious human-wildlife conflict", where a state's chief wildlife warden can allow a tiger to be hunted "after being satisfied that it cannot be tranquilised or translocated", he added.

Can Calvin Klein scent catch a 'killer' tiger?

Remembering India’s ‘super mum’ tigress

Dr Karanth said that sometimes problems do arise in a few tiger habitats where there is a high density of the animals.

"But in 90% of tiger forests there is no such problem. In large parts of eastern and north-east India, tigers are virtually extinct because of excessive hunting of prey and tigers. We should not lose sight of this basic fact," he says.

If tigers enter human habitats and prey on livestock, authorities should immediately pay compensation, he says. And if they become man-eaters, they should be "immediately killed", Dr Karanth adds, calling it "damage control in specific instances".

But the suggestion to cull tigers found some support from reputed environmentalist Madhav Gadgil, who told The New Indian Express newspaper that India should allow "rational hunting" of animals to check their numbers.

"India is the lone country having legislation for protecting wild animals. I think it is irrational, foolish, unconstitutional and nothing to be proud of. No other country protects wild animals outside of its national parks," Mr Gadgil said, according to the report.
Equilibrium — World’s largest toad euthanized in Australia



Sharon Udasin
Fri, January 20, 2023 

Rangers in an Australian national park have found and euthanized the largest toad on record.

Early attempts to name the 6-pound cane toad fizzled, park ranger Kylee Gray told Australian broadcasters, according to Reuters.

“We considered naming her Connie after Conway National Park, but Toadzilla was the one that just kept getting thrown out there, so that kind of stuck,” Gray said.

Toadzilla was the descendant of a botched experiment in wildlife management: the 1935 decision to import Central American cane toads to eat beetles in Australia’s sugarcane fields.

With no natural predators and plenty of other small species to eat, the poisonous toads ate the beetles — then set to work on the rest of the ecosystem.

“A female cane toad like potentially Toadzilla would lay up to 35,000 eggs. So their capacity to reproduce is quite staggering,” park ranger Barry Nolan told Reuters.

The Australian government and public now kill thousands of toads a year, according to the University of Sydney.

The most humane method of euthanasia is to stick frogs in a freezer until they nod off, the university reported.

Toadzilla’s body was donated to the Queensland National Museum, according to Reuters.

Welcome to Equilibrium, a newsletter that tracks the growing global battle over the future of sustainability. We’re Saul Elbein and Sharon Udasin

Today we’ll start by exploring why some veterans who long ago filed toxic exposure claims are now slamming the government for delaying their pursuit of justice.

Plus: The World Trade Organization calls for global carbon pricing, and a look at where future U.S. hydrogen hubs might take root.

Toxic exposure victims slam military, DOJ for delays

Thousands of Americans are waiting to seek justice for a historic set of toxic exposure claims, even though Congress removed barriers from pursuing such lawsuits months ago.

Not giving up: Some of those involved were shocked to see their cases, related to Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, dismissed last month over a technicality.

That technicality has required them to start the process over again.

But they don’t plan to give up the fight just yet.

Hope for survivors: “We sat in the gallery of the Senate three hours while the Senate voted on three different amendments and then took the final vote on the PACT Act,” said Mike Partain, a breast cancer survivor born at Camp Lejeune.

“Veterans were crying. They were hugging each other,” Partain added.

What’s the PACT Act? The Honoring our PACT Act is an expansive bill signed into law in August that improved benefits for veterans exposed to toxins.

Within the bill is a measure permitting lawsuits for those who endured on-base water contamination decades ago at Camp Lejeune.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that payouts to Camp Lejeune victims will amount to about $6.7 billion through 2031.

From elation to frustration: “I can’t explain how elated, how relieved I was that it finally passed,” Partain said.

But those feelings of elation have turned into frustration.

What happened? The same day that President Biden signed the bill into law, groups of plaintiffs filed multiple toxic exposure lawsuits against the U.S.

Just last month, however, Partain found out by chance — through a Google alert — that his case had been dismissed.

The reason for the dismissal, he learned, was a legal technicality: He needed to re-file what’s known as “an administrative claim” before filing his actual lawsuit.

Waiting game: “The law says you have to file an administrative claim with the Department of the Navy,” Partain said. “Our position was we already did.”

To read the rest of the story, please click here.


WTO chief calls for global carbon pricing


Adopting a global carbon pricing scheme could help streamline supply chains and mitigate concerns about competition, according to the head of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Certainty, predictability: “A shared global carbon-pricing framework would best provide certainty for businesses and predictability for developing countries,” WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala said at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

Making pricing consistent: Today there are at least 70 different — and “fragmented” — carbon pricing setups around the world, according to Okonjo-Iweala.

This situation hampers the decarbonization of trade and supply chains, the World Economic Forum stated following her address.

The WTO is now working with the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the International Monetary Fund to streamline carbon pricing, Okonjo-Iweala confirmed.

Realigning tariffs: Okonjo-Iweala also called for the elimination of “skewed” import tariffs that plague national borders today.

Such tariffs favor high-carbon imports over those whose production have generated fewer emissions.

This discrepancy has resulted in what Okonjo-Iweala described as “an implicit subsidy” for carbon production — equal to between $550 billion and $800 billion per year.

Eradicating this bias, she added, could decrease global carbon emissions by 3.6 percent while increasing global income by 0.65 percent.

Need for inclusivity: Decarbonization of global trade and supply chains must occur in a way that is “leaving no one behind,” according to Okonjo-Iweala.

Developing countries, she explained, will need to obtain both “the capacity and infrastructure to demonstrate the low carbon content of their goods.”

At the same time, however, she identified an opportunity for developing countries “to leapfrog” past environmentally harmful stages of development.

Solving ‘the climate puzzle’: Okonjo-Iweala emphasized the need for the scale-up and “diffusion of the green technologies that are necessary to ensure sustainable growth.”

“Trade is the missing piece of the climate puzzle,” she added. “Trade is part of the solution.”

To read the full story, please click here.


Regions compete for billions in hydrogen funding


Dozens of regional business coalitions are competing to win billions in Department of Energy hydrogen funding — and the race is getting tighter.

The 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law includes $8 billion in funding for six to 10 “hydrogen hubs.”

These will be networks of companies that can produce, use or transport hydrogen.

Some must use renewable energy, and some must use fossil fuels.

Competition is narrowing: The Energy Department received 79 proposals — but invited just 33 applicants to move to the next step.

Note of caution: Critics warn that if the hydrogen economy doesn’t take off, these regions could end up saddled with a new rust belt — when wind, solar and battery technology are already competitive.

“The proposition has been that ‘hydrogen is the answer to everything,’” Dennis Wamsted, director of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis told Equilibrium.

“If you don’t agree with that, you start to question the need for a very rapid build-out,” he added.

Who made the cut: The department has yet to reveal these details, but here are some applicants who this week announced that they had made it to the next step:

West Virginia’s Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen hub would manufacture the fuel from the methane in natural gas.

The Great Lakes Clean Hydrogen Partnership would break it from water using nuclear power, industry news site Power Engineering reported.

The Pacific Northwest Hydrogen Association proposes using wind, solar and hydropower — as well as newer forms like tidal energy, according to the Oregon Capital Chronicle

The Southeast Energy Hub would use a mixture of gas, hydropower and nuclear.

What’s next? Final proposals are due to the department in April.


Follow-up Friday

In which we revisit some of the issues we’ve covered this week.

FAA: Outage unintentionally caused by contractors

A single damaged file in Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) computers recently led to a nationwide halt of flights for several hours. The FAA announced on Thursday that contractors “unintentionally” deleted files used for its alert system, leading to the outage, our colleague Lauren Sforza reported.

Pakistan may start importing Russian oil this spring

The International Energy Agency characterized Russia’s oil outlook with a “high degree of uncertainty,” as one of two “wild cards” alongside China. After March, Russia may begin exporting oil to Pakistan — an energy-starved country that already indicated possible interest in discounted Russian crude this fall, Reuters reported.

Davos climate talks feature fossil fuels

Fossil fuel companies are throwing the public “under the bus,” climate activist Greta Thunberg told a panel in Davos, Switzerland, this week. But at the nearby World Economic Forum, the fossil fuel industry presented itself as a necessary part of the future energy system – to the grudging acceptance of some renewables leaders, Reuters reported.
Rich Nations Can Stave Off African Debt Crisis, AfDB Says



Prinesha Naidoo and Matthew Hill
Thu, January 19, 2023 

(Bloomberg) -- Rich nations can help stave off a debt crisis in Africa by allowing low-income countries to delay repayments, speed up the restructuring of liabilities for sovereign defaulters and reallocate International Monetary Fund reserves to countries in need, the African Development Bank said.

Twenty-three African nations were either in, or at a high risk of, debt distress by the end of September, the Abidjan, Ivory Coast-based lender said in a report published Thursday. While risks are seen lingering as governments grapple with the damage caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and economic shocks spurred by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, “persistently tight” global financial conditions could heighten vulnerabilities, it said.

Even before the pandemic, several African countries were burdened by large budget deficits and high levels of debt, and didn’t have the fiscal firepower to stimulate their economies.

Last year, the strong dollar — supported by aggressive monetary-policy tightening by the Federal Reserve — heightened risks for states that borrowed heavily in greenbacks and effectively locked some out of capital markets. It also raised the cost of dollar-priced energy and food imports particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where floods and droughts added to war-induced price pressures.

While African countries need to re-evaluate their debt-carrying capacity and to channel resources into productive investments, global support is needed to lessen the risk of financial fragility, according to the AfDB, the continent’s biggest multilateral lender.

Accelerating Relief


The Group of 20 most powerful economies should revive the Debt Service Suspension Initiative, a move that may allow African countries room to meet Covid-19 recovery costs — including a $144.3 billion bill for vaccines through 2022 — and help absorb shocks stemming from the war, it said.

Relief for countries that signed up under the G-20’s so-called Common Framework should also be accelerated and undertaken in a more transparent manner to create confidence for others.

Ghana — now in default and needing restructuring — didn’t take advantage of the DSSI when it was available. Governments feared participating in the program would trigger credit-ratings downgrades.

The West African nation was also reluctant to restructure its debt under the Common Framework that’s proving to be a long, drawn-out process. Out of three countries that applied, only Chad has a deal with creditors. Zambia is targeting an agreement this quarter, and a civil war interrupted talks in Ethiopia.

The G-20 has resisted previous calls to extend the DSSI, focusing instead on improving the Common Framework processes. World Bank President David Malpass and others have urged a debt standstill for country’s that apply to use the mechanism.

Fast tracking the reallocation of IMF reserves to poor nations from the rich may also help close the continent’s funding shortfall, the AfDB said.

In 2021, the Washington-based lender allocated a record $650 billion of so-called Special Drawing Rights to mitigate the impact of Covid-19 on the global economy. African nations received only $33 billion, or as much as France and Italy combined, and less than half of what the US got — because allocations were based on predetermined quotas such as the size of economies.

The AAA-rated AfDB wants wealthy nations to channel their SDRs through it so that it can account for the assets as equity and leverage them to fast-track development financing at concessional rates for African countries.

Continent-wide gross domestic product growth will probably stabilize at 4% over 2023-24, the lender said. That’s after slowing to an estimated 3.8% in 2022 from 4.8% a year earlier, it said.
'Constitution Loving' Capitol Rioter Flunks Basic Bill Of Rights Question At Trial

Ryan Grenoble
Fri, January 20, 2023 

Richard Barnett sits inside the office of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Jan. 6, 2021.


The Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol rioter infamous for resting his feet on former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s desk and leaving her a crass message testified Thursday in his criminal trial, and he has some regrets.

Richard “Bigo” Barnett told jurors in federal court he wished he’d never attended the rally, nor should he have stormed the Capitol building after, for which he’s facing eight charges.

“I shouldn’t have put my feet on the desk,” the 62-year-old Arkansas resident acknowledged. “At the time, I thought it was funny.”


He also apologized for leaving a “nasty note” on the House speaker’s desk that read, “Hey Nancy, Bigo was here” and called her a “biatch.”

The apologies did little to satisfy government prosecutors, however, who portrayed Barnett as fundamentally lacking in civic literacy despite proclaiming himself as a lover of the U.S. Constitution.

CBS News’ Scott MacFarlane relayed the interaction from the courtroom:



“You love the Constitution?” the prosecutor opened. “Love it!” Barnett responded.

“First Amendment?” the prosecutor asked. “Yes,” said Barnett. “Second Amendment?” the prosecutor continued. “Yes,” said Barnett. “Love the Third Amendment?” asked the prosecutor. “Yes,” said Barnett. “What’s the Third Amendment?” the prosecutor pressed. Then, after a pause, Barnett conceded, “I don’t know.”

(The Third Amendment forbids the federal government from using privately owned civilian homes to quarter soldiers without the owners’ consent.)

Pelosi addressed Barnett’s conduct on Jan. 6 in an interview last year, saying he “disrespected the Constitution of the United States” and exhibited behavior he’ll struggle to explain to his children.

In a previous court appearance, Barnett’s lawyer attempted to argue that referring to Pelosi as a “biatch” should earn him kudos, claiming the term is “a slang and less offensive word for ‘bitch.’”
CNBC Admits It Ran Oil-Happy Column With a Glaring Conflict of Interest

Molly Taft
Thu, January 19, 2023 

Sultan Ahmed al-Jaber speaks at the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Forum last year.

The leader of one of Washington, DC’s most influential foreign policy think tanks got caught shilling for an oil CEO on a major news site—by a right-wing publication that runs hit pieces on renewable energy. This sounds like a Mad Lib, but it’s 2023, and anything is possible!

On Saturday, CNBC posted an op-ed from Fred Kempe, the CEO of the Atlantic Council and a regular contributor to the site. Kempe has several decades of journalistic experience on his resume, but since 2007 he has led the famous think tank, which describes itself as “a nonpartisan organization that galvanizes US global leadership and engagement in partnership with allies and partners.”

In the op-ed, originally called “Sultan Al Jaber is the ideal person to lead the UN climate conference this year,” Kempe lays out an argument for oil and gas giants to be part of the climate solution. “This could be the year fossil fuel producers and climate activists bury their hatchets and join hands to reduce emissions and ensure our planet’s future,” Kempe’s op-ed begins; he goes on to laud natural gas’s position as a “bridge fuel” and claim that the “climate community” has recognized “the energy transition to renewables can’t be achieved without fossil fuels, so they must be made cleaner.” (I’d love to meet this “climate community” who is somehow overlooking the mounting pile of scientific evidence that the world needs to wean off its fossil fuel addiction as quickly as possible.)

The column came on the heels of strong criticism for Al Jaber’s appointment as head of this year’s UN climate conference, known as COP28, thanks to his position as the CEO of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company. Climate activists claim that Al Jaber is a wildly inappropriate figure to lead what should be the preeminent international meeting on climate issues. In response, Kempe argued in his column that the CEO’s “rich background in both renewables and fossil fuels make him an ideal choice at a time when efforts to address climate change have been far too slow, lacking the inclusivity to produce more transformative results.”

Turns out there was a little bit more context to Kempe’s support of Al Jaber than just belief in the idea that activists should work with fossil fuel companies. On Tuesday, CNBC changed the title of the piece and inserted a lengthy editor’s note at the front of the column.

“This article and headline were updated to reflect the fact that the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company and Masdar are major sponsors of the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Forum,” the note reads. “Sultan Al Jaber is CEO of ADNOC and chairman of renewable energy investing firm Masdar. The financial relationship between the companies and Atlantic Council as well as the obvious conflict of interest were not disclosed to CNBC prior to publication of this column and does not meet our standards of transparency.” The piece’s title is now “Making the case for oil CEO Sultan Al Jaber to lead the UN climate conference this year.”

Public donor records posted to the Atlantic Council’s website show that the Embassy of the United Arab Emirates donated more than $1 million to the organization in 2021, while the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the United Arab Emirates gave between $100,000 and $250,000. (The donor rolls of the Atlantic Council are filled with some pretty interesting names: the Charles Koch Institute donated between $500,000 and $1 million, while oil companies Chevron, Cheniere Energy, Eni, BP, ExxonMobil, and Equinor have all given money—as have climate groups like the Clean Air Task Force, the European Climate Foundation, and the National Resources Defense Council.) Al Jabar was the keynote speaker at the Council’s recent Global Energy Forum this month.

We sent several questions to CNBC about the op-ed, including about who flagged the issue as well as the editorial process and any norms around checking for conflicts of interest, but did not hear back as of press time.

A spokesperson from the Atlantic Council told Earther that the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company had no input into what Kempe wrote in his op-ed. “We have an intellectual independence and disclosure section in our editorial guidelines that should have required disclosing the donor relationship,” the spokesperson said. “It hadn’t been followed here, and we made changes to ensure that it was. We made a mistake in not disclosing, contrary to our standards, and we fixed it.”

The oversight appears to have been noticed, by all places, by the Washington Free Beacon, a prominent right-wing outlet whose slogan is “Covering the Enemies of Freedom the way the Mainstream Media Won’t.” According to the Beacon, it sent questions about the potential conflicts of interest with the op-ed after it was published; shortly after, CNBC added the editor’s note.

The Free Beacon is not exactly a place for unbiased news about climate change, fossil fuels, or renewables. (“LOCK HER UP: These Photos of Greta Thunberg Being Carried Away by German Police Will Brighten Your Day,” reads a recent headline, with the subhead “The celebrity climate activist has yet to face justice for her crimes.”) The website itself is bankrolled by Fred Singer, a venture capitalist and top GOP donor who is an active investor in oil and gas (and who has publicly blamed the UAE in the past for the falling price of oil). The outlet has been keeping a close eye on the Atlantic Council, publishing a variety of pieces on funding sources for the think tank in recent months.

Founded in 1961, the Atlantic Council is one of the most prominent foreign policy think tanks in Washington, with connections to governments and high-powered individuals worldwide. Over the past few years, the organization has gone through some public crises as it struggles with conflicts of interests related to its funding. Last summer, it parted ways with a Koch-funded initiative set up at the Council after a rare falling out among members over what some saw as Koch influence on the Council’s political direction.

This whole mess illustrates the complexity of cutting the energy transition along traditional political lines. A think tank that takes money from oil companies, tech giants, and environmental groups alike versus a conservative “news” website funded by an oil-invested venture capitalist—gripping stuff. All over the world, the lines of power are being redrawn around energy policy, and outlets like CNBC need to keep up in order to stay journalistically honest.

 Gizmodo

COMMON PEOPLE

The White House released a video of the two of them eating a hamburger lunch, served by waiters.

Biden and Kamala Harris pat themselves on the back before digging into burgers in a White House video celebrating 2 years in office

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
  • Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are marking two years since being sworn into office.

  • The White House released a video of the two of them eating a hamburger lunch, served by waiters.

  • The two spend the nearly two-minute video rattling off their accomplishments in office.

The White House released an unusual video of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to mark two years since they were sworn into office. It includes waiters, hamburgers, and a heaping serving of self-promotion.

Released from the @POTUS and @VP Twitter accounts, the video shows the two leaders sitting across from each other at a table in the White House, marveling at their own accomplishments over the last two years.

"I think we're off to a pretty good start," says Biden, as he sits down for lunch.

Harris counters that the start has been "great." She gives a nod to "the resilience, the determination" of Americans as motivation and then launches into praise for Biden.

"I wish people could see what I see sometimes," she says, as the video displays photos of them over the last two years. "I've been in the Oval Office with you when the cameras are there and mostly when the cameras are not. And what you have singularly done, based on who you are — and I mean this in all sincerity — to bring together nations, allies in the world, and you bring folks together in a bipartisan way, uniquely.

"You have been an incredible leader these last year," she says as Biden calls her "very gracious."

The two-year mark is coming at a difficult time for the administration as Biden is forced to deal with a newly-formed special counsel investigation of his handling of classified material as well as a Republican-led House, that is determined to investigate Biden and his family.

In the video, they rattle through their highlights reel, which includes job creation, capping the cost of insulin, more female appellate court judges and the appointment of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to sit on the Supreme Court.

Harris calls it "groundbreaking" and Biden says there's a lot more to do. "We've got momentum," they both say as waiters hand them their boxed burger lunches.

The video is being both celebrated and panned on Twitter, likely depending on users' political affiliation.

"This is weird," tweeted Kyle Martinsen, deputy rapid response director for the Republican National Committee.

Chris D. Jackson, a Democrat and county commissioner in Tennessee, however offered additional praise for the administration.

 DID THEY TIP


 

UK leader Rishi Sunak fined for failing to wear seat belt
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak appears to not be wearing his seat belt

JILL LAWLESS
Fri, January 20, 2023

LONDON (AP) — U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was fined by police on Friday for taking off his seat belt to film a social media video in a moving car.

Sunak, 42, has apologized for making an “error of judgment” while recording a message for Instagram from the back of an official government car during a visit to northwest England on Thursday.

The Lancashire Police force said it had looked into video “circulating on social media showing an individual failing to wear a seat belt while a passenger in a moving car in Lancashire.” The force said, without naming Sunak, that it had “issued a 42-year-old man from London with a conditional offer of fixed penalty.”

Failing to wear a seat belt is punishable by a penalty of up to 500 pounds ($620), though fixed penalty notices for such offenses are usually 100 pounds ($124) if paid promptly.

The conditional offer means that the person fined accepts guilt but doesn't have to go to court. Police didn't say how much Sunak was fined.

Sunak's office said in a statement that "the prime minister fully accepts this was a mistake and has apologized. He will of course comply with the fixed penalty.”

It’s the second time Sunak has been fined during his political career. Last year, when he was Treasury chief, he was fined 50 pounds for breaching pandemic lockdown rules by briefly attending a party inside government offices. He was one of dozens of officials fined over the “partygate” scandal, including then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

Sunak took office as U.K. leader in October, promising “integrity, professionalism and accountability" after a tumultuous few years that saw Johnson ousted by multiple scandals and his successor Liz Truss toppled after her policies rocked the U.K. economy.

WAIT IT GETS BETTER
British PM Fined for Not Wearing a Seatbelt While Filming Social Media Video

Nikki Main
Fri, January 20, 2023

Rishi Sunak was fined for not wearing a seatbelt in a moving vehicle

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has been fined for not wearing his seatbelt while filming a social media video in a moving car. Sunak was visiting three towns in the north of England when he posted the video promoting his ‘leveling up’ program on Instagram. The video has since been taken down but can be seen in a YouTube video posted by The Guardian.

The program Sunak was promoting aims to reduce regional inequality by improving education, broadband, and transportation services to bridge the gap between wealthy and poor areas of England. In the video, Sunak addresses the camera as the car is moving and police motorbikes appear in the background.

The fine for not wearing a seatbelt in the UK is £100, or $123, when pulled over, but can increase to a maximum of £500, or $620 if the case proceeds to court. Sunak was in Lancashire when he was pulled over, and local police are currently “looking into” the violation, but have not made any moves to bring Sunak to court.

When asked if Lancashire police had been in touch with the prime minister, a spokesperson stated, “Not that I’m aware of,” the BBC reported.

Sunak, who was fined less than two years ago for participating in ‘Partygate,’ called the decision an “error in judgment” and said he doesn’t believe he is above the law. His spokesperson told reporters that Sunak “fully accepts this was a mistake and apologizes,” adding that the prime minister “believes everyone should wear a seatbelt.”

In the UK, the law requires all passengers to wear a seatbelt, with drivers ensuring those 14 years of age and younger are wearing a seatbelt, while those 14 years and older are responsible for themselves.

There are few exemptions to the law including a passenger having a certificate from a doctor citing a medical reason, or if they’re a passenger in a vehicle used for police, fire, or other rescue services.

A spokesperson for Labour, an alliance of democratic socialists, told the outlet if Sunak is fined, it will be “very serious” due to the fixed penalty he was required to pay following the Partygate scandal when he was a chancellor. Sunak had attended a party at then-Prime Minister Borris Johnson’s home in April 2021, which violated covid-19 lockdown rules.

Conservative members of parliament have criticized the investigation, and Blackpool South MP told the BBC, “The vast majority of people would think that politically motivated complaints about a seatbelt are not a good use of frontline resources.” He added, “Their time is better spent investigating serious crime which impacts on my constituents.”

More from Gizmodo

Op-Ed: Martial law in the Philippines was no 'golden age'

Valmina May and Joy Sales
Fri, January 20, 2023 

Protesters marched on the streets of the Philippine capital in Manila in March 2018 to celebrate International Women's Day and to protest against President Rodrigo Duterte's human rights violations and policies.
(Jes Aznar / Getty Images)

The numbers — 70,000 detained, 35,000 tortured, 3,200 killed — represent the victims of President Ferdinand E. Marcos’ era of martial law, from 1972 to 1986. They mark one of the darkest periods in the Philippines’ history.

That darkness is enveloping the nation and its diaspora once again. In May 2022, 38 years after his family was exiled from the Philippines in the People Power Revolution, Bongbong Marcos Jr. was elected to a six-year presidential term alongside Vice President Sara Duterte, the daughter of former president and authoritarian Rodrigo Duterte.

Marcos and Duterte supporters romanticize martial law as a “golden age,” but many Filipinos — including Filipino Americans like us — reject this distortion of history.

This past year’s developments in the Philippines require Filipinos and non-Filipinos alike to preserve and reinforce our historical memories of dictatorship. Only through a mass movement that remembers the truth of the past can we confront the present-day threat of the Marcos-Duterte administration.

When Marcos Sr. rose to power in 1965, he posed as a populist but made unpopular decisions. He supported the U.S. war in Vietnam, which allowed for the increased use of U.S. military bases in the Philippines; he devalued the peso relative to the U.S. dollar, increasing prices of basic goods and services for working Filipinos; and he violently put down student protesters who opposed his plans to run for a third term.

In 1972, Marcos declared martial law to bypass the two-term presidential limit, and multiple sectors of Philippine society erupted and exercised their right to political dissent: workers and peasants, youth and students, women, and Indigenous peoples.

Because martial law outlawed protests, activists organized underground to fight for social and political change. Their demands ranged from the restoration of civil liberties to winning a socialist revolution. But they all wanted to end the Marcos dictatorship, and they worked to end human rights abuses, such as political detention and torture, and to halt infrastructure projects that violated Indigenous sovereignty, such as the Chico Dam project.

Mass arrests, especially in the first years of martial law, caused many activists to flee the country and settle in major cities like Los Angeles. This anti-Marcos diaspora met like-minded Filipino Americans who were politicized by the civil rights movement, the antiwar movement, and the labor activism of Filipino farmworkers who migrated as U.S. colonial subjects in the 1920s and ‘30s.

In the 1970s and ‘80s, Filipinos in the U.S. and their allies formed organizations such as the Katipunan ng mga Demokratikong Pilipino, National Committee for the Restoration of Civil Liberties in Philippines, Movement for a Free Philippines, and Friends of the Filipino People. They educated the broader U.S. public on the atrocities of the Marcos dictatorship, lobbied Congress to cut military assistance to Marcos, and raised funds to free political prisoners.

Presidents Nixon, Carter and Reagan supported Marcos; as part of the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty, Marcos helped the U.S. maintain its security interests in Southeast Asia, and in return, Marcos received military aid. But eventually he became too great a liability. In 1986, hundreds of thousands of Filipinos joined the People Power Revolution, flooding the streets of Manila to protest Marcos’ attempt to steal the election from Corazon Aquino. Outflanked, the Marcoses fled to Hawaii via a U.S. Air Force transport plane.

Nearly 40 years later, Marcos Sr.’s economic policies still hobble the Philippines. Widespread distrust in government, combined with widening class divisions, created the perfect conditions for the return of a fascist government via Rodrigo Duterte in 2016.

During his presidency, from 2016 to 2022, law enforcement and the military under Duterte killed upward of an estimated 30,000 Filipinos as part of a so-called Drug War. Victims of the Drug War are still waiting for the Philippine government to cooperate with the International Criminal Court and hold Duterte accountable, while the current president Marcos has promised to continue his predecessor’s campaign of terror.

In 2017, Duterte declared martial law for 60 days in Muslim-majority Mindanao, a historically resource-rich and war-torn region with the highest rates of poverty in the Philippines and a 400-year history of resisting colonial forces.

Faced with another era of fascist rule in the Philippines, activists living abroad are working with organizations such as Bayan USA and Malaya Movement USA to channel the spirit of People Power. On Sept. 20, 2022, Filipino activists held a rally at L.A.’s Unidad Park in Historic Filipinotown to mark the 50th anniversary of the declaration of martial law, to commemorate those killed under the Marcos and Duterte regimes and to protest historical revisionism.

It is crucial at this time to speak out against censorship and share fact-based news, since Marcos Jr., following his father’s example, has taken an aggressive stance against press freedom. And it is especially important for Filipinos and our allies in the U.S. to put pressure on the Biden administration to end support of the current Marcos administration through the Philippine Human Rights Act.

The fact that the Filipino masses, with support from progressive media and the U.S. Congress, ousted Marcos Sr. in 1986 suggests that we have the power today to prevent another dark and bloody period.

We have seen history repeat itself in a harrowing way with the return of the Marcoses to Malacañang Palace. But we could also see it repeat with another mass movement that draws on the legacy of people power to rebuild a genuinely democratic Philippines.

Valmina May, an actor, playwright and activist living in Los Angeles, works with Malaya Movement. Joy Sales is assistant professor of Asian American studies at Cal State Los Angeles and serves on the L.A. secretariat of Malaya Movement. This article was produced in cooperation with Zócalo Public Square.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.