Sunday, July 09, 2023

Earth is at its hottest in thousands of years. Here’s how we know.

Observations are enough to make scientists confident that the current period of warming is exceptional


By Scott Dance
Washington Post
July 8, 2023 


People cool off at the beach Thursday on Coney Island in New York. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Observations from both satellites and the Earth’s surface are indisputable — the planet has warmed rapidly over the past 44 years. As far back as 1850, data from weather stations all over the globe make clear the Earth’s average temperature has been rising.

In recent days, as the Earth has reached its highest average temperatures in recorded history, scientists have made a bolder claim: It may well be warmer than any time in the last 125,000 years.

Tracing climatic fluctuations back centuries and millennia is less simple and precise than checking records from satellites or thermometers. It involves poring through everything from ancient diaries to lake bed sediments to tree trunk rings.

But the observations are enough to make paleoclimatologists, who study the Earth’s climate history, confident that the current decade of warming is exceptional relative to any period since before the last ice age, about 125,000 years ago.

Our understanding of conditions so long ago is far less detailed than modern climate data, meaning it’s impossible to prove how hot it might have gotten on any given day so many thousands of years ago. Still, the Earth history gleaned from fossils and ice cores shows the recent heat would have been all but impossible over most of those millennia.

“There’s no way to drop one hot day into the middle of the ice age,” Richard Alley, a geosciences professor at Pennsylvania State University, said.

Temperature reconstruction dating back more than 2,000 years. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

If climate records are like a cassette tape, the tape gets fuzzier and fuzzier the older they get, Peter Thorne, a professor at Maynooth University in Ireland, explained. But even the oldest tapes make a sound.

Records from the most recent decades are, of course, the most detailed. Data from the 1800s is slightly less rich, and slightly less precise, but still thorough. For a period going back about 2,000 years, scientists and historians have used artifacts and geologic observations to piece together climate patterns and extreme events on a scale from decades to single years.


Any earlier, data exists on scales averaged across decades to centuries. For example, a fossil of a fern found beneath a glacier tells scientists that conditions there were once much warmer. They can’t pinpoint the year the fern became trapped in sediment, but they can get a sense of how long ago climate patterns were such that a fern could grow in a given spot.

Measuring up a warm spell 6,000 years ago

If any a single day in the past 100,000 or 125,000 years could have been as hot as the Earth this week, scientists said it could only have occurred about 6,000 years ago. At that time, the planet had warmed with the end of the last ice age, and a period of global cooling began that would continue until the Industrial Revolution.

Scientists are confident that, apart from the global warming of recent decades, it was Earth’s warmest period in the past 100,000 years. They estimate that temperatures averaged somewhere between 0.2 degrees Celsius and 1 degree Celsius (0.36 to 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than they were from 1850-1900.


In comparison, during a record-warm June last month, global temperatures averaged 1.36 degrees Celsius (2.4 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than 1850-1900, according to Europe’s Copernicus Climate Change Service.

During the stretch 6,000 years ago, the warmth was largely the result of fluctuations in Earth’s orbit, which is elliptical rather than circular. While nowadays Earth gets closest to the sun in early January each year, at that time it happened around this time of year, during the Northern Hemisphere summer. That had an overall planetary warming effect because the Northern Hemisphere contains more land than the Southern Hemisphere, and land heats up quicker than oceans.

It’s possible that, even though average temperatures were probably similar to current conditions, day-to-day extremes could have been greater because the planet was so much closer to the sun during the Northern Hemisphere summer, Thorne said. That makes some paleoclimatologists reluctant to say for sure that this week produced the hottest single days in more than 100,000 years.

That conclusion is “certainly plausible,” said Michael Mann, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania known as a pioneer in studying historical climate data. But technically, without 120,000 years of daily temperature data, it becomes “a plausibility argument, rather than a definitive statement,” Mann wrote in an email.

Tree rings from centuries past may help reveal a warming planet’s future 
(Cassidy Araiza for The Washington Post/FTWP)

Unlike any previous warm period, this one was caused by people

That is not to say the current heat isn’t extreme.

“I’m pretty damn certain it’s the warmest day in the last 2,023 years,” said Thorne, who was a coordinating lead author of a chapter exploring long-term changes to Earth’s climate in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Sixth Assessment.

That assessment states with “medium confidence” that temperatures from 2011-2020 exceed those of any multi-century period of warmth over the past 125,000 years.

Further, there is no evidence anywhere in scientists’ understanding of Earth’s history of warming that occurred nearly as rapidly as the ongoing spike in temperatures, caused by the burning of fossil fuels and emissions of greenhouse gases.

If a hotter day happened on Earth anytime in the past, Alley said, it was the result of natural processes.

“The current rise is not natural, but caused by us,” he said.
UN says climate change ‘out of control’ after likely hottest week on record

After record breaking days on Monday and Tuesday, unofficial analysis shows the world may have seen its hottest seven days in a row


Guardian staff and agencies
Fri 7 Jul 2023 

The UN secretary general has said that “climate change is out of control”, as an unofficial analysis of data showed that average world temperatures in the seven days to Wednesday were the hottest week on record.


“If we persist in delaying key measures that are needed, I think we are moving into a catastrophic situation, as the last two records in temperature demonstrates,” António Guterres said, referring to the world temperature records broken on Monday and Tuesday.

The average global air temperature was 17.18C (62.9F) on Tuesday, according to data collated by the US National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), surpassing the record 17.01C reached on Monday.

For the seven-day period ending Wednesday, the daily average temperature was .04C (.08F) higher than any week in 44 years of record-keeping, according to the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer data.


Will El Niño on top of global heating create the perfect climate storm?


That metric showed that Earth’s average temperature on Wednesday remained at the record high of 17.18C.

Climate Reanalyzer uses data from the NCEP climate forecast system to provide a time series of daily mean two-metre air temperature, based on readings from surface, air balloon and satellite observations.

The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), whose figures are considered the gold standard in climate data, said on Thursday it could not validate the unofficial numbers.

It noted that the reanalyzer uses model output data, which it called “not suitable” as substitutes for actual temperatures and climate records. The NOAA monitors global temperatures and records on a monthly and an annual basis, not daily.

“We recognise that we are in a warm period due to climate change, and combined with El Niño and hot summer conditions, we’re seeing record warm surface temperatures being recorded at many locations across the globe,” the NOAA said.

Nevertheless, scientists agree they indicate climate change is reaching uncharted territory and that the increased heat from anthropogenic global heating combined with the return of El Niño would lead to more record-breaking temperatures.

The UN confirmed the return of El Niño, a sporadic weather pattern, on Tuesday. The last major El Niño was in 2016, which remains the hottest year on record.

“Chances are that the month of July will be the warmest ever, and with it the hottest month ever … ‘ever’ meaning since the Eemian [interglacial period], which is indeed some 120,000 years ago,” Dr Karsten Haustein, a research fellow in atmospheric radiation at Leipzig University, said.

Various parts of the world have been experiencing heatwaves and on Thursday the EU’s climate monitoring service said the world had experienced its hottest June on record last month.

The southern US has been sweltering under an intense heat dome in recent weeks, including on the national 4 July holiday on Tuesday. In parts of China, an enduring heatwave has continued, with temperatures reaching above 35C.



Overall, one of the largest contributors to this week’s heat records is an exceptionally mild winter in the Antarctic. Parts of the continent and nearby ocean were 10-20C (18-36F) higher than averages from 1979 to 2000.

“Temperatures have been unusual over the ocean and especially around the Antarctic this week, because wind fronts over the Southern Ocean are strong pushing warm air deeper south,” said Raghu Murtugudde, professor of atmospheric, oceanic and earth system science at the University of Maryland and visiting faculty at the Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai.

Chari Vijayaraghavan, a polar explorer and educator who has visited the Arctic and Antarctic regularly for the past 10 years, said global warming is obvious at both poles and threatens the region’s wildlife as well as driving ice melt that raises sea levels.

“Warming climates might lead to increasing risks of diseases such as the avian flu spreading in the Antarctic that will have devastating consequences for penguins and other fauna in the region,” Vijayaraghavan said.

With Associated Press
‘Wake-up call’: Simultaneous crop failure more likely than thought, study warns

By Kathryn Mannie 
 Global News
Posted July 7, 2023 


A study published Tuesday in Nature Communications is sounding the alarm that the risk of simultaneous crop failure in important food-producing regions around the world has been largely underestimated.

Such an event could threaten the world’s food supply, cause price spikes and even lead to civil unrest, warns the paper’s lead author.


Researchers looked at observational and climate model data between 1960 and 2014, and then at projections for 2045 to 2099, and found that computer models may have blind spots when assessing how likely such a scenario could be.

By “increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases, we are entering this uncharted water where we are struggling to really have an accurate idea of what type of extremes we’re going to face,” said Kai Kornhuber, an adjunct professor at Columbia University who led the study, in an interview with AFP.

The researchers specifically looked at how meandering jet streams, or bands of air currents that keep weather systems moving across Earth’s surface, could trigger synchronized crop failures around the world.

Jet streams don’t just flow nicely in one direction; sometimes they buckle and meander like rivers — something scientists believe is getting worse with climate change. When contortions happen, this can cause pockets of high-pressure weather systems like heat domes, which “block” low-pressure systems like clouds and rain from moving in.

In short, meandering jet streams can cause persistent and extreme weather patterns, like heat waves that seem to go on forever or long stretches of bitterly cold weather. And these extreme weather events can happen simultaneously in different areas along the jet stream.

The researchers found that meandering jet streams have been linked to simultaneous crop failures in the past. For instance, in 2010, contortions in the jet stream were linked to extreme heat in Russia and devastating floods in Pakistan, which hurt crop yields in both areas.

While climate models were accurate at simulating atmospheric patterns in the jet stream, the researchers found, they were much less effective at translating that data into predicting surface weather events and how that would negatively impact crops.

Kornhuber said the study should be “a wake-up call in terms of our uncertainties” about how climate change will impact the food supply, as extreme weather events become more intense and frequent.

“We need to be prepared for these types of complex climate risks in the future and the models at the moment seem to not capture this,” he said.

When the research team looked at projections for crop losses in bias-adjusted models, they found key agricultural areas in North America, Eastern Europe and East Asia could see crop yields fall by up to seven percent under a meandering jet stream — and that global food production could fall by three per cent.

The paper warns that countries that rely heavily on imported food would fare the worst if crops fail simultaneously around the world.

Canada is the fifth largest food exporter in the world, but also the sixth largest food importer. In particular, we heavily rely on imports of fresh fruits and vegetables.

Developing countries are also at a heightened risk when global food production slows. The World Bank found that rising food prices in 2021 were a major factor in pushing about 30 million additional people toward food insecurity in developing nations.

RELATED: Hot, dry weather is causing drought conditions for Canadian farms, with some communities declaring agricultural disasters. Heather Yourex-West speaks with some Alberta farmers who are now fearing their financial future.

 

NOVA SCOTIA

RALPH SURETTE: The carbon tax is needed to stiffen our backbones to face what’s coming


The fuel delivered by tanker trucks now comes with new levies intended to put a price on pollution. - SaltWire file

OK, let’s try the long view on this carbon tax business. Not that it will do much to dampen climate change in the short run, I admit.

What it might do, however, is put some much needed iron in our flabby souls when it comes to facing climate reality.

Yes, Trudeau has dumped on our summer fun, but in fact the carbon tax is just reality in one of its many increasingly ominous forms. (And, yes, there might be alternatives but there’s no serious political voice to make the case, the Poilièvre Conservatives being, at their core, a tarsands party.)

Will this shock be the one that finally gets us to change our ways, which we so fiercely resist?

These shocks have happened repeatedly since the original one in 1973, when the OPEC cartel was formed and put oil prices temporarily through the roof. Climate change wasn’t the issue then, but environmental destruction was (and our vulnerability to oil shocks).


And every time oil prices spiked, a certain sobering kicked in, both at the societal and governmental levels.

But inevitably prices drifted down again and the practice, the philosophy, the justification of energy waste as a way of life, both individually and in the way we organized our physical infrastructure and our general economy, just got worse and worse, tracking the deteriorating climate.

At the local level, here in Yarmouth County, I’m always astonished at how casually some people will drive a monster truck 10 kilometres for a cup of coffee, drive three hours to Halifax to shop a few hours then drive back, or drive to Halifax and take a plane to see a ball game or a concert in Toronto as though this is normal life disconnected from environmental reality. And heaven help the nasty Trudeau if he puts a crimp in all that.

Keep in mind that in our perverse way of measuring progress, all this is good for the economy — more people spewing carbon is good for economic growth, although at the cost of both environment and climate.

On the larger scale, there’s what’s being called revenge travel, people prevented from travelling during COVID and now itching to go.

In the U.S., this July 4 holiday saw more cars on the road than ever and huge numbers clogging the airports, even though thousands of flights were cancelled because of violent, climate change-driven weather, which makes an ironic point. (Another ironic point: July 4 was the hottest day ever recorded on Earth — so far.)


Granted that this sudden tax jolt (plus an increased refinery levy to go with it) is a problem for many: small businesses, delivery people, people who have to drive, renters with oil heat and so many others caught in many ways.

However, this is only half a story. The argument that Maritimers are older, more rural and still more dependent on oil for home heating, therefore more vulnerable than other Canadians, needs a tweak.

This will vary but, in my experience, I’ve found many older people who just hang on to oil no matter the cost, perhaps partly out of habit but mostly because they figure they won’t be there for long so why bother.

These are people who own their own homes, like most rural Maritimers, and are not as poor as they are sometimes made out to be. In fact, as old-time Maritimers they’re quite resilient and could probably teach you something about dealing with life’s problems instead of whining about them.

The attitude seems to be that the pension money, the energy rebates, the savings cover it, so why bother changing? In one case, I’m told of an elderly person who last winter paid $10,000 for oil, an amount that would have, in one year alone, either insulated the leaky old house or bought a couple of heat pumps.

These are not cases that need — or are looking for — sympathy or Premier Houston’s woeful song. Time and/or rising prices will take care of that one. And rising prices are in fact the proper thing to make most of us think twice about some of our loose energy habits, and for governments and institutions of all stripes to address at last, after 50 years of procrastination, the need to gear what we build to the climate emergency.

Speaking of the climate emergency, which is what this is all about, I was intrigued by last Saturday’s paper, which was full of complaint about the carbon tax, capped off by an article among the obits entitled Climate nears point of no return, say experts, outlining the speed at which the situation is deteriorating, with this year’s deadly heat waves already the worst ever throughout the U.S. South, parts of Europe, and India and China.

Sobering indeed.

Wind-to-hydrogen projects still in play across Newfoundland, as list gets whittled to 9

Province to make final decision by end of August

Windmills on a barren, flat landscape.
Wind farms, such as this one near St. Lawrence, could soon be popping up around Newfoundland. The provincial government is one step away from deciding which companies can place windmills on Crown land across the island. (Dan Arsenault/CBC)

There are now nine companies with a chance to build green hydrogen projects on Crown land in Newfoundland and Labrador.

The Department of Industry, Energy and Technology announced Thursday it has whittled down the list from 24 proposals by 19 different companies.

The government is expecting to finish the second and final round of decisions by the end of August.

"I'm extremely thrilled that we've gotten to this stage and I appreciate a lot of hard work has gone into this," said Energy Minister Andrew Parsons. "It's a pretty significant step forward but there is still a lot of hard work to do."

While the department is not naming the companies, CBC News has been able to verify eight of the nine and where their plans are located. They are:

  • Pattern Energy at the Port of Argentia.
  • Brookfield Renewable Partners in Placentia Bay.
  • ABO Wind in Come By Chance.
  • North Atlantic in Come By Chance.
  • Everwind Fuels on the Burin Peninsula.
  • Exploits Valley Renewable Corporation in central Newfoundland.
  • World Energy GH2 on the southwest coast of Newfoundland.
  • Fortescue Future Industries on the southwest coast of Newfoundland.

Marystown mayor elated

With Everwind Fuels moving on to the next round, the vast majority of the Burin Peninsula is still in play. That's great news for Marystown Mayor Brian Keating.

"The whole peninsula is abuzz today," Keating said Friday. "I've had over 100 calls already from other mayors and people on the energy advisory board saying, 'Woohoo.'"

portrait style photo of marystown mayor brian keating.
Marystown Mayor Brian Keating says the Burin Peninsula is buzzing. (Terry Roberts/CBC)

The company has plans for more than two gigawatts of wind energy, along with the potential to build wind farms offshore. If approved, it's expected to break ground next year and employ as many as 5,000 people during construction.

Keating said the company has done everything he's wanted to see, and more.

"Newfoundland has been asking for companies like this for years," he said. "They came, they asked our opinion, they gave us the information on what they were going to do before they did it."

The projects could be a lifeline for the Burin Peninsula, which Keating said is going through a lull right now. It's a familiar refrain for many of the regions that could see hydrogen projects.

What comes next?

The regulatory process doesn't end with Thursday's announcement.

While the first phase looked at the proponents' experience and financial capacity to build and operate these massive projects, the second phase will look deeper into those criteria and examine the proponents' reliance on the electrical grid, how they plan to engage the communities around them and how their projects will benefit the province.

The lands in question will be held in reserve until the process is finished.

"I'm not prejudging anything," Parsons said on Thursday. "We could have nine. We could have zero."

A man with medium length brown hair and a short brown beard, speaking at a microphone. He's wearing a white collared shirt and a black blazer.
Energy Minister Andrew Parsons says he isn't prejudging the situation. (Patrick Butler/Radio-Canada)

Companies with wind generation over one megawatt will have to go through an environmental assessment and the companies themselves will have to make a final investment decision once all approvals are in place.

Parsons said it has been important to balance due diligence with a speedy approach, since there is a race to market in this emerging sector. The minister had hoped to be further ahead by now, but said it was important to be thorough.

"We're still behind where I wanted to be, but again, we weren't going to sacrifice scrutiny for the sake of getting things done quick."

Did the Cambrian explosion really happen?

The Cambrian explosion is often presented as a chaotic moment in early evolutionary history (Image credit: canbedone via Getty Images)

A cursory flip through any high school biology textbook will inevitably surface a mention of the Cambrian explosion, a period about 540 million to 520 million years ago during which many animal groups first sprang into life and diversified. The event is frequently described as rapid and prolific, evoking a chaotic moment in early evolutionary history. 

But was there really a dramatic burst of biodiversity on Earth during this time? 

Thomas Servais, a paleontologist and research director at the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), and colleagues published a 2023 paper in Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology arguing that the Cambrian explosion didn't happen in the way it's popularly portrayed. It wasn't truly an explosion, he told Live Science, but rather a gradual increase in biodiversity that took place throughout the early Paleozoic era (541 million to 251.9 million years ago). The appearance of an "explosion," he said, is really an artifact of the biases scientists have when studying the past. 

The process of locating, excavating and cataloging fossils is costly and laborious, so researchers often add their specimens to large databases to make it easier to compare finds. Two of these databases, the Paleobiology database and the Geobiodiversity database, collectively contain roughly 2 million entries and have been used to investigate global patterns in biodiversity, including trends that appear during the Cambrian.

The authors assert that these resources aren't truly global, however. The Paleobiology database is largely made up of fossils found in Europe and North America, while the Geobiodiversity database mostly includes fossils from China. These regions host some of the most famous Cambrian deposits in the world — including Canada's Burgess Shale and the Chengjiang fossil bed in China's Yunnan province — that pull the majority of the funding. But at best, they can give "a regional assessment of patterns in diversity, and then only for those species that preserve well enough to persist in the fossil record," Servais said.

The databases also include specimens from another period, called the Great Ordovician biodiversification event (GOBE), thought to have taken place roughly 40 million to 50 million years after the Cambrian explosion. The period between the two events is relatively understudied and seems to lack the same pattern of flourishing biodiversity. But this too, Servais said, is the result of bias on the part of scientists. Were they to put the same effort into studying this period, the existence of two individual events would likely melt away, he said.

Related: Why do Cambrian creatures look so weird?

Researchers have unearthed numerous fossils from the Cambrian period. (Image credit: NPS)

Karma Nanglu, a paleontologist at Harvard University who studies Cambrian and Ordovician fossils, told Live Science he understands why Servais and his colleagues would like to tamp down on the use of terms like "explosion" and "event," and said it's well-accepted in the field that biodiversity estimates may be influenced by sampling bias. "But to my mind, I still do think there is actually quite good evidence that there was a Cambrian explosion, as we would typically call it," he said.

Regardless of whether the databases are biased toward certain groups or areas, there is a general trend of increasing complexity that is visible in the animals themselves.

"It's not just that two species are equivalent to each other in terms of what they contribute to diversity, it's that species A and species B are drastically different from each other in terms of the way their bodies are organized, how they develop, what their ecological role might be, how they live," Nanglu said. "And to that point, I think there's direct evidence that you can read straight from the rocks.

The causes for this biodiversification aren't fully known, but scientists have a few ideas. During the Precambrian, the supercontinent Rodinia broke apart into pieces, including Gondwana (modern-day Antarctica, South America, Africa, Australia, India and New Zealand) and Laurentia (most of North America). During this time, oxygen levels in the ocean increased, and there was a greater proportion of warm, shallow, tropical coastline — the perfect conditions for new species to evolve and later be fossilized in. A similar hypothesis has been studied for the breakups of the supercontinents Pannotia and Pangaea much later, and researchers have identified a link between the fracturing and animal diversity in the Phanerozoic eon (541 million years ago to the present).