Tuesday, December 05, 2023

SIBERIA
"He was an impeccable man." In Kolyma, the museum of Varlam Shalamov was closed

LONG READ
November 30, 2023
Varlam Shalamov

The authorities of Kolyma closed the memorial room of the writer, author of the famous "Kolyma Stories" Varlam Shalamov. The mini-museum was located in the village of Debin. It was opened in 2005 on the occasion of the writer's centenary in the local hospital, where the Gulag prisoner Shalamov, who was already dying of hunger and back-breaking work, was sent during the years of Stalin's repressions. An exposition in his memory was collected in Debin by local enthusiasts. And she operated in the hospital for many years. But now the museum has been formally closed by the Ministry of Health of the Magadan Region, but in fact the resolution came "from somewhere above," they say in Debin.
In order not to miss the main materials of Sibir.Realii, subscribe to our YouTube, Instagram and Telegram.

"Reached Socialism"

It all started with a report by a local journalist who came to the Shalamov Museum this autumn and at the same time told about the emergency condition of the hospital building in which it is located.

"The journalist wanted the best, but it turned out as usual with us," says local historian Ivan Dzhukha. "The building is really in disrepair – by 2027 this TB hospital is going to be closed, although they still do not dare to demolish the building. After all, the monument – at first it was the largest building in Kolyma, there was a convoy that guarded the repressed. And then a hospital was opened, in which Shalamov, who was exiled here, miraculously survived. He had already "reached the point of socialism" (the expression of those years, meaning that a man was "almost dead"), but here in this hospital he literally came back to life, here he wrote poems and stories as a prisoner. Of course, this is a monument and a very iconic place for a memorial in his memory.

Hospital in the village of Debin

But after the uproar in the press about the state of the hospital, for some reason it was decided to close the memorial room.

"On the eve of the [presidential] elections, the authorities do not need this fuss, they knocked on the head of their subordinates, they recouped at the museum. As far as I understood, the chief physician was hit on the head from above by the minister of the region, and then the governor joined in. As a result, the museum, which had been collected by residents, local historians, and historians for 20 years, was closed," the local historian explains.

A year ago, Jukha initiated the renovation of the room in which the exposition dedicated to Shalamov is located. Now there are various utensils from the everyday life of Kolyma prisoners, their working tools, originals from Shalamov's personal library, which were donated to the museum by the family of the writer's close friend Irina Sirotinskaya, as well as copies of his handwritten diaries, recreated by a volunteer artist. The museum was equipped and repaired on donations from local residents and admirers of the writer.

Shalamov Museum in Debin Hospital

- Elena Kubantseva, a designer and artist of the Gelendzhik Museum of Local Lore, and Vladimir Etikhin, a Kolyma pensioner and former mechanical engineer, agreed to help free of charge. Kolyma gold miner Sergey Filevsky helped significantly, also free of charge. The workers of his enterprise made everything wooden: showcases, bookshelves, stands. Several parcels with books (about 40 kg!) of Shalamov, both in Russian and in many languages of the world, were sent by the son of Irina Sirotinskaya, the successor, keeper and publisher of his heritage, - says the local historian.

Shalamov Museum in Debin Hospital

The building of the Debin hospital - several buildings connected to each other in three floors - is still considered "high-rise" in the village. The three-storey hospital "made of the best continental bricks" was described by Shalamov more than once in his "Kolyma Tales":

"The building was built to last. The corridors were filled with cement... Central heating radiators, sewer pipes – it was... Kolyma of the Future... The furniture in the club was all carved. The doctors of the prisoners were of all specialties... Already in 1948 there were two surgical departments – clean and purulent, two therapeutic departments, a neuropsychiatric department, a women's department, two large tuberculosis departments, a skin and venereal department, and one wing was given to civilian patients.

Shalamov came to Kolyma after his second arrest in January 1937, when he was sentenced to 5 years for "counter-revolutionary Trotskyist activities." The route was as follows: by train to Vladivostok, by steamship "Kulu" to Nagaev Bay, where the city of Magadan was being built. Shalamov worked at the Partizan gold mine, in a geological exploration party, mined coal in Kadykchan and Arkagal. In 1943, he was given a third term of 10 years for "anti-Soviet agitation."

Varlam Shalamov (1907–1982)

This period turned out to be the most difficult. At the end of 1943, Shalamov was already dying: "In a completely helpless state, I moved from the face to the hospital and back again, and again returned to the face. I spent a lot of time in Kolyma hospitals, as long as they could keep me."

Shalamov was saved by prisoner-doctor Andrei Pantyukhov, who arranged for him to take courses as paramedics. After them, in 1946, Shalamov was sent to the village of Debin, where he worked as a paramedic in the surgical department.

Shalamov describes his first meeting with the doctor in the story "Domino":
"They put me on a stretcher. My height is one hundred and eighty centimeters, my normal weight is eighty kilograms... On this icy evening, I had sixteen kilograms left, exactly a pound of everything: skin, meat, entrails, and brain.

"My name is Andrei Mikhailovich," the doctor said. "You don't need to be treated.
I got sucked under the spoon.

"Yes," the doctor repeated in a loud voice. "You don't need to be treated. You need to be fed and washed. You have to lie down, lie down, and eat. True, our mattresses are not feather beds. Well, that's okay – toss and turn a lot, and there will be no bedsores. Lie down for two months. And then there's spring."

In the story "Courses" Shalamov recalled:
"I knew how to take a siphon enema, a Bobrov apparatus, a scalpel, a syringe... I've learned a thousand things that I didn't know before—things that are necessary, necessary, useful to people."

In 1949, Shalamov worked for a year at a logging site, and then returned to Debin again as a paramedic in the emergency room.

In the autumn of 1951, Shalamov was released, but for two more years he worked as a volunteer paramedic near Oymyakon. Only in 1953 he was able to leave Kolyma and began work on "Kolyma Stories". As a former prisoner, he was forbidden to stay in Moscow for more than a day. For a couple of years after returning from Kolyma, he lived in the village of Turkmen in the Moscow region.

In 1955, Shalamov filed an application to the Prosecutor General's Office for rehabilitation, in 1956 the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR considered it and overturned the decision of the Special Meeting of the NKVD of the USSR in 1937 and the verdict of the military tribunal in 1943. Shalamov was rehabilitated.

He moved to Moscow, and a year later the Znamya magazine published his poems for the first time. Since 1966, Shalamov's stories have been regularly published in émigré publications. In May 1979, the writer, whose genetic disease was progressing, was taken to a home for the disabled, from where in January 1982 he was forcibly sent to a psychoneurological boarding school as punishment for publications in the West. On the way, he caught a cold and died of pneumonia on January 17.
"Well, throw it in the trash!"

Having learned that the writer's memorial room had been closed, Jukha called the head physician of the Deba TB hospital, Natalia Sidorenko.

"She suddenly replied sharply, like, yes, they have closed it, where are we going to put the things (that's what she called the exposition)?" I'm like, 'Well, throw it in the trash!'" says Juha.

Shalamov Museum in Debin Hospital

Natalia Sidorenko answered the phone numbers listed on the website of the branch of the Magadan Dispensary of Phthisiology and Infectious Diseases, but after the first question from the correspondent of Sibir.Realii, she hung up.

The Ministry of Health of the Magadan Region also refused to comment by phone, advising to "write an official request addressed to the minister."

Jukha has already written to the head of the Ministry of Health of the Magadan Region, Ivan Gorbachev, and asked him to preserve the exposition, which has been collected for 20 years.

"Dear Ivan Vladimirovich!
Ivan Georgievich Dzhukha from Gelendzhik writes to you.
I am the person who, together with two other enthusiasts on a voluntary basis, with the active support of Natalia Ivanovna Sidorenko and dozens of Russian citizens who donated their money, made a radical reconstruction of the Memorial Room of the great Russian poet and writer V. Shalamov in Debin.

Created 20 years ago by Chief Physician G. Goncharov, the Room was not included in the list of museum objects of the Ministry of Culture of the Moscow Region, but was exclusively under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Health. Funds voluntarily donated by Russian citizens were spent on the collection of new valuable exhibits (in addition to those already collected by G. Goncharov and local historians). My assistants and I flew to Kolyma at our own expense and worked on a voluntary basis. A great help in the restoration of the Room was provided by the heirs of V. Shalamov...
The room has been actively visited by travelers on the highway all the years. It has become a must-have for all tour operators. The guest book clearly confirms this.

....

All the more unexpected was the decision to close the Great Writer's Room. Moreover, the exposition is dedicated not only to V. Shalamov; there were large expositions on the history of the hospital itself, the village of Debin, the construction of the first bridge over the Kolyma River...

I know that in time the hospital will be closed. During this time, I am sure, the issue of placing exhibits in the new premises will be resolved. I would like to transfer the Room "under the wing" of the Museum of Local Lore, under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Culture.

I am sorry not so much for the destruction of my and my colleagues' work, but for the undermining of the idea of charity and patronage in the field of culture and art...

But the main thing is that it is a shame for the great writer, without whom Russian literature is inconceivable today, without whose name the history of Kolyma is incomplete.

I appeal to you with the hope that this situation will be rectified. The decision to close has been made by your department.

Sincerely, I. Jukha, writer, former geologist, who worked on exploration along the tributaries of the Debin River.

The author of the letter has not yet received a response from the minister.

Ivan Dzhukha comes from a family of Mariupol Greeks who were repressed and exiled to Tomsk. In 1974, as a student at Moscow State University, he was sent to Kolyma for geological practice, and then returned here almost thirty years later.

"In the 1970s, I spent four months here on reconnaissance. Then, all the years, I dreamed of returning to Kolyma, I gave up teaching geology and mineralogy at the university. And in 2001 he came to Kolyma. By that time, I already had a historical novel, a book about the repressed Mariupol Greeks, and I had already begun work on the repressions against the Greeks exiled to Norilsk, Krasnoyarsk, Arkhangelsk, and the Komi Republic, Kazakhstan. It was then that I discovered that most of the Greeks were in Kolyma, the circle was closed – I came here, setting myself the task of finding all the names. Found 1200 Greeks in 20 years of work. And, of course, I also studied the iconic figures who served their exile here. Korolev, Shalamov. Through the efforts of the local community of geologists, local residents and residents of the writer's small homeland - Vologda - they raised funds and opened a memorial plaque stating that Varlam Shalamov lived and worked in this hospital from 1946 to 1951," says Dzhukha.

According to him, Chief Physician Sidorenko personally cut the ribbon at the opening event after the renovation of the museum room in August 2023.

– It's a shame, of course, it's a shame, one of the main creators of the museum is the former head doctor of the hospital, my good friend, Georgy Borisovich Goncharov, he quit a long time ago and moved to Dagomys, I often visited his house, since I live in Gelendzhik. Before the war, he went to visit his children, who lived with him in Kyiv. And when the war started, I started calling him, and he said, "As long as I'm safe." Then he tried to go home, he has a job there, patients, but he couldn't. The last time we spoke was in February-March last year, and the connection was broken. I don't know anything about him, I'm looking for him on all channels, all phones are cut off," says Ivan Dzhukha. "He is still highly respected in Debin, he is a Doctor with a capital letter, he has never been a lackey, and now he would never close the museum, just to curry favor with his superiors. And he would have protested against the closure of the hospital, just like the residents themselves.

Locals confirm that the closure of the TB hospital "will finally finish off the village."

"Consider this a city-forming enterprise, the village is already withering, without it it will definitely collapse," says Svetlana, a resident of Debin. "And the doctors say that's wrong – the climate here is the most useful for tuberculosis patients, that's why it was discovered here. About 180-190 people signed a document that they were against [the closure of the hospital]. The museum, of course, is also important. But we only found out about its closure. Many tourists follow it and go to our Left Bank. So, we are not too on the route, we still need to get there.

People say that many people in the village asked the head doctor Sidorenko why and why the museum was closed. "This is not my decision," the doctor was quoted as saying by the interlocutors of Sibir.Realii.

– My friend, also the creator of the Kolyma Memorial Museum, also turned to Gorlacheva (Lyudmila Gorlacheva, Minister of Culture and Tourism of the Magadan Region), the Minister of Culture. Her: What do we have to do with it? Formally, of course, they are right, but the Minister of Culture could have reacted in a completely different way. But in Magadan, all officials are under the thumb of the governor. And the governor there is a "cool" guy, Nosov. The same one who, when he took office as governor, said that you, they say, call us a camp land, Korolev was sitting with us, but he worked here in his specialty. Sergey Pavlovich Korolev. Well, to speculate, then Shalamov also worked here in his specialty, right? He wrote poems and short stories while he was a prisoner. And no one spoke out against it. And it won't squeak. First of all, the elections are approaching, and they have an attitude: no negativity should be heard in the public space at this time. And besides, the camp topic is clearly out of favor now," Ivan Dzhukha argues.

In recent years, there has been a struggle in the Russian regions against memorial sites associated with the history of Soviet repressions. Memorial stones and crosses are being destroyed and desecrated, and plaques are being torn down. For example, in Yakutia, the authorities dismantled a monument to repressed and exiled Poles, in the Irkutsk region they sawed down a cross to repressed Lithuanians, and in the Tomsk region, unknown persons stole plaques with the names of Polish victims of Soviet repression in the 1930s and destroyed the cross.

"Shalamov is a powerful, tragic figure. And the museum, in fact, supports not only his memory, but our entire Kolyma," says Irina Zhulanova, a resident of Kolyma, Doctor of Geological Sciences, teacher at the N.A. Shilo Eastern Research Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – I have been working in Magadan all my life, for 60 years, although I graduated from Leningrad University. I myself fought for our regional library, which has been named after Pushkin since Stalin's times, to be named after Shalamov (with this idea we met Jukha). Because his tragedy is the tragedy of the whole country, and, except for him, no one has written so thoroughly and talentedly about Kolyma, about the whole essence of Stalin's machine. No one. Even Solzhenitsyn, in my opinion, did not cover the topic of repression in this way.

Now, of course, the whole topic of repression is being actively hushed up, since we are once again living in a criminal state. Putin is 100% evil, I'm a Leningrader myself, and when he opens his mouth, I just hear the words of the Leningrad punk from the yard. I was born in 1942 near Stalingrad, when Stalin died in 1953, it was the 4th grade, school. So now, of course, people are frightened again and prefer to keep quiet. Even as for the war in Ukraine, for example: in my inner circle, everyone thinks exactly the same as I do, they believe that this is a crime, but they are afraid to say it publicly.

As for the Shalamov Museum, it was a special destiny and he was an impeccable person. And people should know both their history and what impeccable people there are in the world," says Zhulanova.

No one knows what will happen to the exhibits from the Shalamov Museum now: the museum room in the hospital is closed, visitors are not allowed to enter it. Juha and the other creators of the museum hope that the exhibition will be preserved at least until they find a new space. They don't know if they will be able to find it.

Upd

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Health of the Magadan Region explained the decision to close the museum by the fact that it is located in an operating tuberculosis dispensary: "People with tuberculosis or suspected of this diagnosis are treated there. This airborne infectious disease can infect anyone, but children are especially susceptible to tuberculosis due to insufficiently formed immunity. <... >That is, there should be no strangers, including museum visitors, in this medical institution."

The regional Ministry of Culture promised to preserve all the exhibits from the memorial room and transfer them to the local history museum. "The unique exhibits collected by the staff of the hospital in the village of Debin and enthusiasts will be transferred to the fund of the regional museum of local lore. Now this issue is being resolved, the museum's specialists are working directly with the hospital: it is necessary to describe the items, conduct an examination to establish the historical and cultural value, and transport the items to Magadan," said the head of the ministry, Lyudmila Gorlacheva.
Orban Says Ukraine's EU Accession Not Currently In Hungary's PUTIN'S Interest

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban (file photo)



Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said opening European Union accession negotiations with Ukraine is not currently in Budapest's interest and that the 27-member bloc should opt instead for a "strategic partnership" with the war-wracked country.

In a progress report last month, the European Commission -- the bloc's executive body -- recommended opening EU accession negotiations with Ukraine once it meets the required conditions after gaining candidate status together with much smaller Moldova in June last year.

Orban, a right-wing populist who has maintained warm relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, has long been at odds with the EU over rule-of-law and corruption concerns and has seen the bloc freeze 22 billion euros ($24 billion) in cohesion funds for Hungary until it introduces judicial and human rights reforms.

In his weekly interview with Hungarian state radio on December 1, Orban said opening membership talks with Kyiv does not coincide with Hungary's interests and we "dare say it, no matter how much pressure they put on us," in an apparent reference to alleged interference from Brussels.

"I would favor the EU reaching a strategic partnership agreement with Ukraine first," Orban said, adding that such a partnership could take up to 10 years until Ukraine could adapt to the EU's requirements

"When we see that we can cooperate, then let's bring up the issue of membership again, but that will be possible only after many, many years," he said.

Orban again spoke against continuing giving Ukraine financial aid, in what critics see as an attempt by Budapest to blackmail the EU into releasing its frozen cohesion funds in exchange for Hungary not using its veto power as the European Commission seeks unanimous support to ensure a 1.1 trillion euros ($1.2 trillion) revision of the bloc's budget that would include 50 billion euros for Ukraine.

"Europe has economic problems but in the meantime throws money away -- it sends wagonloads of weapons and money to Ukraine," Orban said.

Orban and his government have repeatedly spoken against the bloc's giving military aid to Ukraine to fight Russia's unprovoked aggression, arguing without evidence that such aid would only prolong the war.

The EU will hold a summit on December 14-15.
Canadian factory downturn deepens as new orders hit 15-month low


By Fergal Smith
December 1, 2023

Workers are seen at Bri-Steel Manufacturing, a manufacturer and distributer of large diameter seamless steel pipes,  in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 


TORONTO, Dec 1 (Reuters) - Canada's manufacturing sector contracted for a seventh straight month in November as global industrial weakness weighed on output and new orders, and despite an increase in hiring, data showed on Friday.

The S&P Global Canada Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) fell to a seasonally adjusted 47.7 in November from 48.6 in October.

A reading below 50 indicates contraction in the sector. The PMI has been below that threshold since May, which is the longest such stretch since February 2016.

"Once again, the Canadian manufacturing PMI revealed some of the broad-based challenges facing the economy heading towards the end of the year," Paul Smith, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said in a statement.

"Output and new orders remain mired in contraction territory, linked in part to a broader-based global industrial weakness which is limiting demand and sales. Destocking remains prevalent across the supply chain, and client budgets are stretched."

The output index fell to 46.1 from 46.9 in October and the measure of new orders was at 45.4, its lowest level since August 2022, down from 48.3.

The employment measure was a bright spot, moving into expansion territory for the first time since April, as it rose to 50.7 from 49.9 in October.

But inflation pressures picked up, with the input price index rising to 55.6 from 55.1 in October and the output price measure at 54.8, its highest level since February, up from 52.6.Report this ad

"Although inflation rates remain well down on previous year's highs, both vendors and manufacturers alike remain willing to push cost increases downstream to clients," Smith said.
STATEMENT
All women and girls – including those with disabilities – have a right to bodily autonomy

3 December 2023
Bastina, 18, lives with albinism and is a member of Rapariga Biz, in Mozambique. Her mother abandoned her when she was young because of her albinism. 
© UNFPA Mozambique

Statement by UNFPA Executive Director on the International Day of Persons with Disabilities

Persons with disabilities are too often defined by what they cannot do, or by what society assumes they cannot do. The International Day for Persons with Disabilities is a moment to recognize the important contributions, achievements and leadership they demonstrate in making our societies more just, equitable, and inclusive.

Today, more national laws and policies protect the rights of persons with disabilities than ever before. Services are increasingly responsive to their specific needs, and there is increased attention on supporting people with disabilities to have access to sexual and reproductive health information and services as well as safe, healthy and satisfying intimate relationships. Statistical systems are better at capturing data relevant to their experiences. In telling a fuller story of the disparities and discrimination faced by persons with disabilities, these data help expose and close critical gaps.

One in five women globally is a person with a disability. Yet from households to parliaments, too few are empowered to make decisions that have far-reaching consequences for their bodies and lives. This includes fundamental choices about their sexual and reproductive health and rights, the foundation for bodily autonomy, wellbeing and ability to determine their own future.

Women and girls with disabilities may be up to three times more likely to be involuntarily sterilized than the general population. Violence also blocks women and girls with disabilities from realizing their full potential. Online and offline, in homes and chatrooms, they confront significant risks of harassment and harm, including rates of intimate partner violence two to four times higher than their counterparts without disabilities.

Change is happening but needs to pick up speed. UNFPA’s close collaboration with movements of women with disabilities has helped galvanize momentum. Together, we are developing tools to protect rights and choices and uproot discrimination. Our partnership with Women Enabled International has produced guidelines that are improving the quality of sexual and reproductive health care and services in over 70 countries, ensuring they meet the diverse needs of persons with disabilities. In Eastern Europe and Asia, UNFPA is training health-care providers on specific skills to assess and respond to gender-based violence against persons with disabilities.

Through the We Decide programme, UNFPA promotes the human rights and social inclusion of persons with disabilities, particularly women and young people. Our goal is to expand access to sexual and reproductive health services as well as the information and education people need to make the best choices for themselves.

Today and every day, UNFPA stands with persons with disabilities globally in their call for action to protect and promote their fundamental rights, and support their leadership in shaping more inclusive and peaceful societies for everyone.


STATEMENT
Ending inequalities and empowering communities are key to vanquishing AIDS pandemic

1 December 2023
© UNFPA Eswatini
Statement by UNFPA Executive Director on World AIDS Day

The world has made remarkable strides in curbing the AIDS pandemic. There is much to celebrate: New HIV infections have dramatically slowed, and AIDS-related deaths are down 51 per cent from 2010. Yet, we are not at the finish line: The virus still claims far too many lives – an average of one per minute in 2022 – and progress towards ending HIV transmission remains uneven.

Ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 requires halting the epidemics of gender inequality and of the gender-based violence that fuel its spread.

Women and girls are twice as likely to acquire HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as men and boys. They can face difficulties negotiating safer sex due to unequal power balances, and often have limited access to information about HIV prevention and fewer resources to access preventive measures. Sexual violence also increases the risk of HIV transmission. Women who face intimate partner violence in countries with high HIV prevalence are up to 50 percent more likely to acquire the virus.

Inequalities as well as stigma and discrimination endanger too many people. Sex workers, men who have sex with men and transgender people, among other marginalized groups, are also at higher risk of contracting STIs– and of slipping through the cracks of health-care systems.

Empowering affected communities stands out as a proven strategy to address these challenges. Community-led responses can better reach high-risk individuals, tailor interventions to localized needs, improve access to health care, and reduce inequalities in service delivery.

UNFPA sees the power of community action every day through its work with local advocates around the world. For example, Teenergizer, a regional network in Eastern European and Central Asia, brings together young people to promote HIV awareness and health lifestyles among peers, including through online learning and counselling services. TransWave Jamaica, a transgender-led civil society organization, is developing a service referral system for the specific needs of trans people.

In East and Southern Africa, the 2gether 4 SRHR programme mobilizes “mentor mothers” and community health-care workers to help people living with HIV access health services and contraceptives. Youth LEAD convenes LGBTQI+ people in Asia and the Pacific to stand up for their rights.

Embedded in local communities, these organizations are able to integrate robust protection measures into daily life to address stigma and discrimination and to make inclusive prevention the standard, not the exception.

Yet, as powerful as community organizations can be in making change, they cannot do it alone. Ending AIDS as a public health threat also requires significant, sustained investment and political will from decision-makers at all levels..

Working together, we can pave the way towards a world where prevention is inclusive and comprehensive healthcare is accessible to everyone, whoever and wherever they are, providing hope and dignity for all.

 Chinese space plane Tengyun Photo Credit: Social media

Special Space Plane Puts China Ahead Of Competitors – Analysis

By 

China’s ambitious and secretive space plane program is of great interest in terms of possibly filling a gap in low Earth orbit operations. China is using the development of its orbital test vehicle to outpace competitors in a specific strategic space. Given the current economic issues Beijing is facing, proceeding with the space plane appears to be a top priority.

The Chinese space plane is called Tengyun (cloud rider). Another name used is Chongfu Shiyong Shiyan Hangtian Qi. It is an experimental, reusable unmanned spacecraft and is in the early stages of its program, but it has much potential. Since the US thinks that China will surpass it in terms of space capacity by 2040, understanding this type of approach to space and its economy is important.

China is developing the Tengyun so that it can fly from runway to orbit and return to Earth at hypersonic speeds. The craft can be used up to 20 times. The hypersonic space plane boosts China to the forefront of the aerospace industry, eclipsing the capabilities of other competing systems. The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation is recruiting the best talent and using the best technology in the country’s aerospace field to support Tengyun.

China is keeping the orbital test vehicle a closely guarded secret. There have been only three known missions. In 2016, China constructed an enormous 5 km runway at the site later known as the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in the Gobi Desert. Tengyun took off on Sept. 4, 2020, under unusually heavy secrecy compared with other recent Chinese space missions, which have been quite public, broadcast on television or the internet. On Sept. 6, China announced that the spacecraft had returned to a “scheduled landing site.” The two-day flight added a tremendous amount of momentum to the program. The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation called the space plane flight a “complete success,” saying it “marks an important breakthrough” in China’s research into reusable spacecraft technology.

The second trip was much longer in duration: the Tengyun launched on Aug. 4, 2022, and returned on May 8 this year. That was some 276 days in orbit for the unmanned craft. The orbital test vehicle reportedly conducted materials exposure and thermal control coating tests, as well as possibly assessing candidate radiation-shielding materials. It is unknown if any other country exploring space has this type of capability.

Longevity of flight appears to be a unique attribute for this type of space plane. The US has two X-37B vehicles and their first flights measured more than 200 days. One flight, launched in May 2020, saw the X-37B set new records for duration, as it stayed in orbit for more than 900 days. The shorter duration of the Chinese space plane’s flights may indicate that it has a special role in testing hypersonic technologies or other activities related to a high-velocity atmospheric reentry besides robotics. On one of the flights, China released and recaptured an object, which is raising some questions about space plane testing.

Clearly, the Tengyun is a fully functioning and unique space plane that is possibly able to make robotic repairs or deploy smaller spacecraft for space-based defense systems over a multiyear period. This may be quite problematic given the international community’s current arms control and space law requirements. We have to remember that China in 2019 became the first country to land on the far side of the moon, so Beijing’s space ambition is significant for the future space economy and security. Being able to place payloads from a reusable space plane is advantageous and cost-effective.

In addition, some argue that the Tengyun is in competition with America’s Boeing X-37B space plane, which debuted in 2010. Like the X-37B, the Chinese space plane appears to have a specialized engine system and is relatively small. But the Tengyun seems to be more dynamic in its capabilities and potential. The trend lines for the two programs are thought to put the Chinese ahead of its competitor, if the Tengyun data is correct and sustainable.

If the space plane is part of the establishment of China’s first co-orbital anti-satellite platform — a type of kinetic physical space weapon — then there will be arms control and other international legal problems. Such weapons require a projectile or other orbiting object to disrupt targeted satellites. Co-orbital anti-satellite platforms require the ability to adjust their orbits so they can move close to targeted satellites. They can disrupt, damage or destroy satellites through various means. China is known to have conducted such tests before examining debris fields.

Overall, China is making great strides in its Tengyun space plane program. Beijing’s space plane is a low Earth orbit-based platform that has longevity and great capabilities across a range of domains, including both the peaceful use of space and a number of negative possibilities.

Chinese space plane Tengyun Photo Credit: Social media


Dr. Theodore Karasik
 is a senior advisor to Gulf State Analytics and an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Lexington Institute in Washington, D.C. He is a former Advisor and Director of Research for a number of UAE institutions. Dr. Karasik was a Lecturer at the Dubai School of Government, Middlesex University Dubai, and the University of Wollongong Dubai where he taught “Labor and Migration” and “Global Political Economy” at the graduate level. Dr. Karasik was a Senior Political Scientist in the International Policy and Security Group at RAND Corporation. From 2002-2003, he served as Director of Research for the RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy. Throughout Dr. Karasik’s career, he has worked for numerous U.S. agencies involved in researching and analyzing defense acquisition, the use of military power, and religio-political issues across the Middle East, North Africa, and Eurasia, including the evolution of violent extremism. Dr. Karasik lived in the UAE for 10 years and is currently based in Washington, D.C. Dr. Karasik received his PhD in History from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Robert Reich: What Really Happened To The American Dream? (Why American Capitalism Is So Rotten, Part II) – OpEd

By 

Today I want to address the disappearance of what was once called the “American dream.” Its disappearance provides an important clue about why Trumpism continues to attract so many.

During the 1950s and 1960s, my father, Ed Reich, owned a shop on the main street from which he sold women’s clothing to the wives of factory workers. 

This time of year reminds me of his anxious dependence on holiday sales. Between Thanksgiving and Christmas, he needed to earn enough to pay the bills and have a sufficient sum to carry us through the first part of the following year. 

We weren’t rich but never felt poor, and our standard of living rose steadily through the 1950s and 1960s — as factory workers and their spouses did better and better. 

This was an era when the income of a single factory worker or schoolteacher or baker or salesman or mechanic was enough to buy a home, have two cars, and raise a family.

FOR THREE DECADES after World War II, America created the largest middle class the world had ever seen. During those years, the earnings of the typical American worker doubled, just as the size of the American economy doubled. 

Over the last 40 years, by contrast, the size of the economy has more than doubled again, but the earnings of the typical American have barely budged (adjusted for inflation).  

Then, the CEOs of large corporations earned an average of about 20 times the pay of their typical worker. Now, they rake in over 300 times. 

In the 1950s and 1960s, the richest 1 percent of Americans took home 9 to 10 percent of total income. Today they take home more than 40 percent. 

Then, the economy generated hope. Hard work paid off. The living standards of most people improved through their working lives. Their children enjoyed better lives than they had. Most felt that the rules of the economic game were basically fair.

Although many women, Black people, and Latino people were still blocked from getting a fair share of the economy’s gains, the nation committed itself to changing this. New laws guaranteed equal opportunity, barred discrimination, promoted affirmative action, and expanded educational opportunity for all. 

Today, confidence in the economic system has sharply declined. Its apparent arbitrariness and unfairness have undermined the public’s faith in it. Cynicism abounds. Equal opportunity is no longer high on the nation’s agenda. 

To the contrary, our economic and political system now seems rigged. 

That’s because it is.

THE THREAT TO CAPITALISM is no longer communism or fascism but a steady undermining of the trust modern societies must depend on. 

When most people stop believing they and their children have a fair chance to make it, the tacit social contract begins to unravel. And a nation becomes susceptible to demagogues such as Donald Trump. 

We have the power to change all this, recreating an economy that works for the many rather than the few. But to determine what must be changed, and to accomplish it, we must first understand what happened and why.

The conventional explanation is that globalization and technological change have made most Americans less competitive. The tasks we used to do can now be done more cheaply by lower-paid workers abroad or by computer-driven machines. Presumably, artificial intelligence will accelerate this trend. 

The conventional solution — at least among people who call themselves liberals, Democrats, and progressives — has been an activist government that raises taxes on the wealthy, invests the proceeds in excellent schools and other means people need to get ahead, and redistributes to the needy. 

This solution has been vigorously opposed by people who called themselves conservatives and Republicans, who believe the economy will function better for everyone if government is smaller and if taxes and redistributions are curtailed.

BUT THE CONVENTIONAL EXPLANATION for what has happened overlooks a critically important phenomenon — the increasing concentration of political power in a corporate and financial elite that has been able to alter the rules that run the economy.

And the conventional solution is in some ways beside the point, because it takes insufficient account of the corruption of government by these moneyed interests. 

The debate over the merits of the “free market” versus an activist government has diverted attention from how the market has come to be organized differently from the way it was a half-century ago, why its current organization is failing to deliver the widely shared prosperity it delivered then, and what the basic rules of the market should be.

The diversion of attention is not accidental. 

Many of the most vocal proponents of the “free market” — including executives of large corporations and their ubiquitous lawyers and lobbyists, denizens of Wall Street and their political lackeys, and numerous multimillionaires and billionaires — have for many years been actively reorganizing the market for their own benefit and would prefer these issues not be examined.  

MARKETS DEPEND for their very existence on rules governing property (what can be owned), monopoly (what degree of market power is permissible), contracts (what can be exchanged and under what terms), bankruptcy (what happens when purchasers can’t pay up), labor unions (how much power should workers have), and how all of this is enforced.

Such rules do not exist in nature. They must be decided upon, one way or another, by human beings. 

These rules have been altered over the past four decades as large corporations, Wall Street, and wealthy individuals have gained increasing influence over the political institutions responsible for them.

Simultaneously, centers of countervailing power that between the 1930s and 1980s enabled America’s middle and lower-middle classes to exert their own influence — labor unions, small businesses, family farms, and political parties anchored at the local and state levels — have withered. 

The consequence has been a market organized by those with great wealth for the purpose of further increasing their wealth. 

This has resulted in ever-larger upward distributions inside the market, from the middle class and poor to a minority at the top. Because these distributions occur inside the market, they have largely escaped notice.

As we’ll see, the meritocratic claim that people are paid what they are “worth” in the market is a tautology that begs the questions of how the market is organized and whether that organization is morally and economically defensible. 

In reality, income and wealth increasingly depend on who has the power to set the rules of the game.

CEOs of large corporations and Wall Street’s top traders and portfolio managers effectively determine their own pay, advancing market rules that enlarge corporate profits while using inside information to boost their fortunes. 

Meanwhile, the pay of average workers has gone nowhere because they have lost countervailing economic power and political clout. The simultaneous rise of both the working poor and non-working rich offers further evidence that earnings no longer correlate with effort or with the common good. 

All of this has brought us Donald Trump and America’s lurch toward fascism. 

The underlying issue is not the size of government. It’s whom the government is for. 

The remedy is for the vast majority to regain influence over how the market is organized. This will require a new countervailing power — allying the economic interests of the majority who have not shared the economy’s gains. 

The battle pitting the “free market” against government is needlessly and perversely preventing such an alliance from forming.

The biggest political divide in America in years to come will be between, on the one side, the complex of CEOs of large corporations, top executives and traders at Wall Street banks, private equity and hedge-fund managers, and other moneyed interests who have fixed the economic and political game to their liking. And on the other side, the vast majority who have been left behind. 

Some of the people who have been left behind are susceptible to the lies and bigotry of neofascists like Trump.

But the answer is not to give up on democracy. 

To the contrary, the only way to reverse course is for the vast majority who now lack influence over the rules of the game to become organized and unified, in order to reestablish the countervailing power that was the key to widespread prosperity five decades ago.

IF WE DISPENSE with mythologies that have distracted us, we can make the system work for most of us rather than for only a relative handful. 

History provides some direction as well as some comfort, especially in America, which has three times in our short history readapted the rules of the political economy to create a more inclusive society, while restraining the political power of wealthy minorities at the top. 

In the 1830s, the Jacksonians targeted the special privileges of elites so the market system would better serve ordinary citizens. 

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, progressives enacted antitrust laws to break up the giant trusts, created independent commissions to regulate monopolies, and banned corporate political contributions. 

In the 1930s, New Dealers limited the political power of large corporations and Wall Street while enlarging the countervailing power of labor unions, small businesses, and small investors.

The challenge is not just economic but political. Economics and politics cannot be separated.

It’s time for the Democratic Party and its leaders to give full-bodied voice to the forces — labor unions, small businesses, worker cooperatives, worker-owned businesses, family farmers, nonprofits, bottom-up politics, and all of us who are still committed to the common good — that together can countervail the overwhelming power of the big monied interests. 

The issues we’ll discuss over the next eight weeks harken back to an earlier tradition of inquiry. The field used to be called “political economy” — the study of how a society’s laws and political institutions relate to a set of moral ideals. A fair distribution of income and wealth was a central topic. 

In the eighteenth century, it was termed moral philosophy. (Adam Smith called himself a moral philosopher). 

We must now return to the moral questions at the heart of politics and economics. 

This article was published at Robert Reich’s Substack



Robert Reich

Robert B. Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies, and writes at robertreich.substack.com. Reich served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written fifteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock", "The Work of Nations," and"Beyond Outrage," and, his most recent, "The Common Good," which is available in bookstores now. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, "Inequality For All." He's co-creator of the Netflix original documentary "Saving Capitalism," which is streaming now.