Saturday, January 13, 2024

Half a million on London march against Israeli genocide

People took to the streets in solidarity with Palestine—and against the West’s bombing of Yemen

By Socialist Worker journalists
Saturday 13 January 2024
Issue 2887


A sea of solidarity on the London Palestine march (Picture: Guy Smallman)

The solidarity movement for Palestine roared back onto the streets in vast numbers on Saturday. Around 500,000 people took to the streets in London on an angry and loud march that was full of fight and determined to stop the slaughter by Israel.

This was the biggest march since 11 November—and was part of a global day of action. It was expected to see demonstrations in over 120 cities, across 45 countries and on six continents to demand an end to the bombing of Gaza and Yemen.

Many marchers said this week’s genocide hearing against Israel had made them even more determined to be active for Palestine. “The evidence wasn’t a surprise to me, but it put it in front of the whole world,” marcher Faiza, a teaching assistant from west London, told Socialist Worker.

“And it didn’t just show that Israel is guilty but also those who support Israel in the US and Britain are also just as much to blame for the killing of children.

“And I can add Keir Starmer to the list of shame because he has not backed a ceasefire. It’s so important we have come out in such numbers today.”

The movement went into something of a lull over Christmas. There’s no lull now. Protester Sam said she has no illusions in international bodies like the United Nations or the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

“I see that a genocide ruling is important, but for me, I don’t see the point in the UN or the ICJ if they don’t do anything,” she explained. “It also makes me mad that millions of people can take to the streets, and people in power just don’t listen.

“I feel like I can’t vote for Labour or the Tories. But then, who do I vote for? The Greens of the Lib Dem, I’m not sure I want to do that. For me this entire political system is broken.”


Full coverage of the struggle in Palestine

Marchers denounced the US and British assault on Yemen. Yemeni cousins Joe Al Shujaa and AK Al Shujaa from Birmingham, said, “It’s the entire population being targeted, not the Houthis as they claim

“To Starmer and Sunak, we say stop the bombing, stop supporting Israel’s war, for humanity. We protest not just for the Palestinians but we come out for everyone whether it’s for Sudan, Yemen, Syria or anywhere else.”

Marcher Sam said, “How do the Tories have money for their wars when homelessness is through the roof, the NHS is collapsing, and thousands go to foodbanks? To me, it’s disgusting.”

Julia, a Unison union member, said, “The Tories are playing with fire. And Keir Starmer should’ve condemned Israel and stood up against what the Tories are doing, especially now in Yemen.”

It wasn’t just the size of the demonstrations that was impressive. People are increasingly radical as well.

Three months ago many thought that a giant turnout on protests could win a ceasefire and perhaps blunt British support for Israel. Now they know no scale of murder that will satisfy Israeli leader Binyamin Netanyahu. And the West will mutter warnings but in the end back him.

So many people want more militant methods. The big marches are crucial to show the size of the movement and give people confidence to speak out and organise. It’s important to build the Stop The War Coalition and Palestine Solidarity Campaign’s events.

But other disruptive actions and workplace revolts are needed now as well. Halima, from Tower Hamlets in east London, said, “We need to keep momentum going.

“ Interrupting public services and disruptive actions such as sit-ins will have more of an impact. People should not go about their everyday lives. We can’t return to normal.”

Tobi from Tower Hamlets said, “We also need more workplace actions to put a stop to the economy. There has not been enough so far.”

It was a good sign that more workers than before joined the London demo. But the numbers are still far too low because the trade union leaders don’t build support. It has been up to grassroots groups to build the turnout.

On the London demonstration, Jess from CWU Members for Palestine said, “Bombs wouldn’t be built without workers. It’s on us to withdraw that labour while it is being used to kill civilians.

“We want the CWU union to do something, because it’s not. My union is the United Tech and Allied Workers union and our parent union is CWU. We need more big marches more often and more direct action. Normality can’t just resume while this is going on.”

John from Surrey said, “We need to look at what Just Stop Oil is doing and replicate that for the Palestine solidarity movement. What we are doing now is not enough—politicians are not listening.”

He described the attacks on Yemen as “disgusting”. “Why are a few rich countries attacking a poor country like Yemen?” he said.

Robina, a Unison union member from Leeds said, “We mustn’t lose momentum and we have to keep up the pressure on our government.”

She is frustrated by the lack of action from trade unions and has “not heard anything from my trade union”. “Trade unions should take a position with Palestine and stand in solidarity,” she said.

Everyone should be building for action on 7 February, a day of workplace and student action across Britain.

Climate Activists for Palestine formed a sizeable bloc on the demonstration that was much larger than in previous times.

Sean from Just Stop Oil said that anyone who can should take direct action for Palestine and against the arms trade. “We need to use every tactic we have,” he said. “We need big marches. We need to shut down arms factories and take up boycotts.

Matt, who’s also in Just Stop Oil, added, “We’re here to show that Palestine is a climate issue. We must keep repeating that there is no climate justice on stolen land.”

It’s time to raise the movement for Palestine and against imperialism to new levels.
Trade unions for Palestine

Trade union banners on the London demonstration included:

Unison Salford branch, Cambridgeshire NEU, Birmingham Unison, Camden Unison, Waltham Forest NEU, Homerton Hospital Unison, UCU Soas, CWU Essex, City and Islington NEU, Camden NEU, Bolton Unison, Goldsmiths UCU, UTAW (CWU) tech workers, West Sussex NEU, York Unison, Southend-on-Sea Unison, South Central CWU, London and Eastern region Unite, Brighton UCU, Lancaster and Morecambe NEU, IWGB—workers for a free Palestine.
Marches in Scotland

Around 1,000 marched for Palestine in Glasgow, 500 in Edinburgh and 150 in Aberdeen, for a protest at Barclays. After the main protest for Palestine at the Glasgow City Chambers, Stop the War activists led a march to the Ministry of Defence to oppose Britain bombing of Yemen.
Day of action in north west of England

Monday 15 Jan, 1pm, North West England day of action against Barclays. Barclays Bank holds over £1 billion in shares, and provides over £3 billion in loans and underwriting to nine companies whose weapons, components, and military technology have been used in Israel’s armed violence against Palestinians.

Full list of actions
Actions called by PSC, Stop the War and others:Wednesday 17 January: Why Palestine is a trade union issue. Stop the War Coalition trade union network meeting, online, 6.30pm.
Saturday 20 January: National Day of action for Palestine—local demonstrations.
Monday 22 Jan – Saturday 27 January: Stop Arming Israel Actions, including local Barclays protests on Sat 27 Jan.
Saturday 3 February: National Demonstration for Palestine in London.
Wednesday 7 February: National day of workplace and student action for Palestine
Oxfam report reveals scale of Israeli murder

Israel’s military is killing Palestinians at an average rate of 250 people a day which massively exceeds the daily death toll of any other major conflict of recent years. That was the message from the charity Oxfam this week.

Its statement shows that almost everyone outside the imperialists and their friends knows the full extent of the horror flowing from Israel’s onslaught on Gaza.

Sally Abi Khalil, Oxfam’s Middle East Director, said, “The scale and atrocities that Israel is visiting upon Gaza are truly shocking. For 100 days the people of Gaza have endured a living hell. Nowhere is safe and the entire population is at risk of famine.

“It is unimaginable that the international community is watching the deadliest rate of conflict of the 21st century unfold, while continuously blocking calls for a ceasefire.”

Oxfam calculated that the number of average deaths per day in Gaza is significantly higher than “any recent major armed conflict” including Syria, Sudan, Iraq, Ukraine, Afghanistan and Yemen.

The aid agency goes on to warn that Israel is forcing people into smaller areas due to constant bombardment, as they are forced to flee from places they have previously been told are safe.

Oxfam staff in Rafah on the border with Egypt report massive overcrowding, with very little food and water, and essential medicines in desperately short supply. Oxfam doesn’t say it, but it’s precisely the central elements of the “international community” that allow the murder and suffering to continue.

Global Protests Draw Thousands in London, Elsewhere in Pro-Palestinian Marches

January 13, 2024 
Associated Press
Little Amal, a 12-foot puppet in the image of a 10-year-old Syrian refugee, joins a pro-Palestinian demonstration as protesters hold placards and flags in London on Jan. 13, 2024.

LONDON —

Children joined thousands of other demonstrators making their way through central London for a pro-Palestinian march Saturday, part of a global day of action against the longest and deadliest war between Israel and Palestinians in 75 years.

The plight of children in the Gaza Strip after nearly 100 days of the Israel-Hamas war was the focus of the latest London march, symbolized by the appearance of Little Amal, a 3.5-meter (11.5-foot) puppet originally meant to highlight the suffering of Syrian refugees.

The puppet had become a human rights emblem during an 8,000-kilometer (4,970-mile) journey from the Turkish-Syrian border to Manchester in July 2001.

Nearly two-thirds of the 23,843 people killed during Israel’s campaign in Gaza have been women and children, according to the Health Ministry in the Hamas-run territory.

Israel declared war in response to Hamas’ unprecedented cross-border attack on Oct. 7 in which the Islamic militant group killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 250 others hostage. It was the deadliest attack in Israel’s history and the deadliest for Jews since the Holocaust.

March organizers said the Palestinian children will accompany Little Amal through the streets of central London.

“On Saturday Amal walks for those most vulnerable and for their bravery and resilience,” said Amir Nizar Zuabi, artistic director of The Walk Productions. “Amal is a child and a refugee, and today in Gaza childhood is under attack, with an unfathomable number of children killed. Childhood itself is being targeted. That’s why we walk.”

London’s Metropolitan Police force said some 1,700 officers will be on duty for the march, including many from outside the capital.

Home Secretary James Cleverly said he had been briefed by police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley on plans to “ensure order and safety” during the protest.

“I back them to use their powers to manage the protest and crack down on any criminality,” Cleverly said.

A number of conditions were placed on the march, including a directive that no participant in the protest shall venture near the Israeli Embassy.

A pro-Israel rally is set to take place in London on Sunday.

The London march was one of several others being held in European cities, including Paris, Rome, Milan and Dublin, where thousands also marched along the Irish capital's main thoroughfare.

Protesters waved Palestinian flags, held placards critical of the Irish, U.S. and Israeli governments and chanted, “Free, free Palestine.”


Thousands march in London for Gaza ‘day of action’



By AFP
January 13, 2024

A supporter waves a Palestinian flag during the march in central London calling for a ceasfire in Gaza - Copyright AFP ALASTAIR PIKE

Thousands of pro-Palestine protesters marched in central London on Saturday as part of a “global day of action” to oppose Israel’s bombing campaign in Gaza.

Around 1,700 police were on duty for the march, with major demonstrations taking place in London on most Saturdays since Israel began its war against Hamas following the October 7 attack.

“We want to show the people of Palestine we are with them and to speak up against our government as well,” 27-year-old health service worker Maleeha Ahmed, who was at the march with her family, told AFP.

“They are playing a very, very big role in allowing Israel to continue what they are doing and it’s just not acceptable,” she said.

Another marcher, Dipesh Kothar, 37, said it was “very frustrating to sit and watch the world do nothing”.

“That’s why we come out to show support for the Palestinian people and show our unhappiness with the governments around the world,” he said.

Saturday’s march holds particular significance given the UK’s air strikes in Yemen this week against Huthi bases, after attacks by the Iran-backed militants on ships in the Red Sea in solidarity with Gaza.

Police warned protesters that they face arrest if they “intentionally push the limit” with placards and chants.

They also said that protesters must stick to the route specified and that the event must finish by 5.00 pm (1700 GMT).

The day of action, involving 30 countries, was called by the UK organising coalition comprising the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, the Palestinian Forum in Britain, the Stop the War Coalition, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Friends of Al Aqsa and the Muslim Association of Britain.

“Millions of people will take to the streets across the world this Saturday, to demand a permanent ceasefire and a lasting political settlement for all Palestinians,” said Kate Hudson, general secretary of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.

“The UK government must end its support for Israel’s brutal war in Gaza, and join the wider international community in condemning its war crimes,” she said.

Palestine in London

Demonstration part of global day of action, mobilizing for comprehensive cease-fire in Gaza across 60 cities in over 30 countries

Aysu Biçer |13.01.2024 - AA

People, holding banners and Palestinian flags, stage a demonstration in support of Palestinians, and demanding ceasefire as they march towards Parliament Square in London, United Kingdom on January 13, 2024.

LONDON

A pro-Palestine march began on Saturday in the heart of London, marking the seventh demonstration in the British capital since Israel's onslaught on the Gaza Strip began in early October.

Drawing hundreds of thousands of participants, the event was organized by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), which has lauded the protests as constituting "one of the largest, sustained political campaigns in British history."

This demonstration is part of a global day of action, mobilizing for a comprehensive cease-fire in Gaza across 60 cities and over 30 countries.

The groups departed from Bank junction in the City of London at roughly midday, heading via Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment to Parliament Square, where speeches are to take place.

The PSC, expecting about 250,000 participants in the march, which is the first since the new year began, acknowledged the myriad of developments in the region during this period.

Notably, the march featured the presence of Little Amal, a giant puppet representing a Syrian child refugee, who will join a group of Palestinian children in the procession. The symbolic addition aims to draw attention to the plight of refugees in the region.

Home Secretary James Cleverly, in anticipation of the protest, voiced confidence in the Metropolitan Police's ability to ensure order and safety during the event.

He endorsed the use of police powers to manage the protest and address any potential criminal activities.

Around 1,700 officers are on duty to police the march on Saturday, including many from forces outside London, with attendees warned that those who intentionally push legal limits on placards and slogans could face arrest.

'Hands off Yemen'

One thing that sets this march apart from its predecessors, which followed a different route through the city, was the diverse array of flags and banners unfurled throughout the crowd.

Alongside the familiar calls for a free Palestine and cease-fire in Gaza, it featured banners supporting South Africa, which has filed charges of genocide against Israel with the International Court of Justice in The Hague, and Yemen, where members of the Houthi group are blocking Israel-affiliated ships from entering the Red Sea.

The rally drew attention to the ongoing conflict in Yemen, with protesters holding banners with the demand, "Hands off Yemen."

The UK and US, with the support of Australia, Bahrain, Canada, and the Netherlands, conducted airstrikes Thursday against military targets in Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen, following a string of Houthi attacks in the Red Sea that destabilized trading routes.

"We won't stop until a permanent cease-fire is achieved," a protestor told Anadolu, asserting that the demonstration was sending a strong message that "the world is waking up to the interconnectedness of our struggles."

"South Africa's case against Israel resonates with us, and we're here to demand justice for all those facing injustice, be it in Gaza, Yemen, or anywhere else," she added.

South Africa, which filed the case in December, accused Israeli authorities of perpetrating genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. It requested provisional measures from the court to protect Palestinians, including by calling upon Israel to immediately halt military attacks.

South Africa laid out a list of alleged genocidal acts by Israel on the first day of the hearing Thursday, while Israel defended itself Friday.

Israel has killed more than 23,800 Palestinians in Gaza since an Oct. 7 cross-border offensive by Palestinian resistance group Hamas. The military campaign has also caused mass displacement, destruction, and hunger.

 

Scientists discover the first new antibiotics in over 60 years using AI

Scientists discover the first new antibiotics in over 60 years using AI
By Oceane Duboust

A new class of antibiotics for drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria which was discovered using more transparent deep learning models.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is proving to be a game-changer when it comes to medicine with the technology now helping scientists to unlock the first new antibiotics in 60 years.

The discovery of a new compound that can kill a drug-resistant bacterium that kills thousands worldwide every year could prove to be a turning point in the fight against antibiotic resistance.

"The insight here was that we could see what was being learned by the models to make their predictions that certain molecules would make for good antibiotics," James Collins, professor of Medical Engineering and Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and one of the study’s authors, said in a statement.

"Our work provides a framework that is time-efficient, resource-efficient, and mechanistically insightful, from a chemical-structure standpoint, in ways that we haven’t had to date".

The results were published in Nature and co-authored by a team of 21 researchers.

Study aimed to 'open the black box'

The team behind the project used a deep-learning model to predict the activity and toxicity of the new compound.

Deep learning involves the use of artificial neural networks to automatically learn and represent features from data without explicit programming.

It is increasingly being applied in drug discovery to accelerate the identification of potential drug candidates, predict their properties, and optimise the drug development process.

In this case, researchers focused on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Infections with MRSA can range from mild skin infections to more severe and potentially life-threatening conditions such as pneumonia and bloodstream infections.

Almost 150,000 MRSA infections occur every year in the European Union while almost 35,000 people die annually in the bloc from antimicrobial-resistant infections, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

The MIT team of researchers trained an extensively enlarged deep learning model using expanded datasets.

To create the training data, approximately 39,000 compounds were evaluated for their antibiotic activity against MRSA. Subsequently, both the resulting data and details regarding the chemical structures of the compounds were input into the model.

"What we set out to do in this study was to open the black box. These models consist of very large numbers of calculations that mimic neural connections, and no one really knows what's going on underneath the hood," said Felix Wong, a postdoc at MIT and Harvard and one of the study’s lead authors.

Discovering a new compound

To refine the selection of potential drugs, the researchers employed three additional deep-learning models. These models were trained to assess the toxicity of compounds on three distinct types of human cells.

By integrating these toxicity predictions with the previously determined antimicrobial activity, the researchers pinpointed compounds capable of effectively combating microbes with minimal harm to the human body.

Using this set of models, approximately 12 million commercially available compounds were screened.

The models identified compounds from five different classes, categorised based on specific chemical substructures within the molecules, that exhibited predicted activity against MRSA.

Subsequently, the researchers acquired around 280 of these compounds and conducted tests against MRSA in a laboratory setting. This approach led them to identify two promising antibiotic candidates from the same class.

In experiments involving two mouse models - one for MRSA skin infection and another for MRSA systemic infection - each of these compounds reduced the MRSA population by a factor of 10.

 

Red Sea trade route still months away from safety, says Maersk boss

This photo released by the Houthi Media Center shows Houthi escort the cargo ship Galaxy Leader on Sunday, Nov. 19, 2023.
By Indrabati Lahiri

Trade in the Red Sea has significantly reduced ever since the start of the Houthi conflict and could still be several months away from returning to normal levels.

Global maritime trade has been facing a major setback from the increasing attacks on the Red Sea, halving the number of containers shipped in the area in December and leaving a serious impact on global trade in recent months

The Red Sea conflict, mainly driven by the Iran-backed Yemeni Houthi rebels protesting at Israel’s actions in Gaza, is continuing to heat up, with several more attacks on commercial ships from various countries.

A number of shipping companies, such as Maersk, MSC and Hapag-Lloyd have temporarily halted sending their shipping containers through the conflict zone, requiring vessels to take long and costly detours around South Africa. 

Vincent Clerc CEO of Danish shipping giant Maersk told the Financial Times the disruptions could last for months, and could even further inflame global inflation. 

"It's unclear to us if we are talking about re-establishing safe passage into the Red Sea in a matter of days, weeks or months…It could potentially have quite significant consequences on global growth," said Clerc. 

Supermarket chains such as Tesco, have already issued warnings that the Red Sea conflict could cause price increases for certain items.

Maersk, which carries one-fifth of the global maritime freight, had an attempt at restarting trips after a US-led military coalition tried to create a safe passage in the region but was forced to divert its ships again after a further attack at the end of December.

US and UK retaliate against Houthi attacks

Recently, the UK and US launched air strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen, targeting more than a dozen sites so far, including missile and drone facilities. 

Oil prices reacted sharply o these strikes, with European benchmark Brent crude oil jumping more than 3% on Friday afternoon, surpassing $80 per barrel on ICE Futures Europe. West Texas Intermediate crude also rose more than 3% to more than $75 per barrel.

According to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak: "The United Kingdom will always stand up for freedom of navigation and the free flow of trade. We have therefore taken limited, necessary and proportionate action in self-defence."

US President Joe Biden highlighted: "These targeted strikes are a clear message that the United States and our partners will not tolerate attacks on our personnel or allow hostile actors to imperil freedom of navigation in one of the world’s most critical commercial routes."

Global trade significantly disrupted by Red Sea attacks

A new report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy outlined that global trade in the Red Sea fell almost 1.3% between November and December, due to the Houthi attacks. The number of containers usually travelling in the area dropped by nearly 70%.

This has led to significant increases in transportation time and freight costs between East Asia and Europe, as several containers need to find alternative routes, often as far as going around the African continent.

Several countries have also taken hits to their imports and exports, with Germany seeing a 1.9% drop in exports and a 1.8% fall in imports. The European Union saw a 2% slide in exports and a 3.1% reduction in imports. The US saw a 1.5% decrease in exports and a 1% slip in imports, although the country is somewhat less dependent on the Suez Canal and Red Sea than the EU.

China, on the other hand, no doubt stepping into the vacuum, saw a 1.3% rise in exports and a 3.1% jump in imports. However, this could also be due to an annual cyclical trend before the Chinese Lunar New Year.

 

Winter of discontent in Slovakia: Why the new government is already under scrutiny

By Julian GOMEZ

Opposition parties, NGOs, legal experts, journalists and activists have strongly criticised PM Robert Fico and his plans to scrap Slovakia's special prosecutor's office, which is currently handling several cases involving Fico's own party.

It has taken just a few weeks for the new government in Slovakia to attract an eclectic movement of discontent, gathering not only opposition parties, but also NGOs, legal experts, journalists and different activists from civil society.

Our reporter Julián López went to the very heart of the protests to try to understand exactly what is happening.

Protests against Prime Minister Robert Fico and his plans to scrap the Special Prosecutor's Office have lately gained momentum in Bratislava and other Slovak cities.

The Office deals with high-level corruption and organised crime. It is currently handling several cases involving Mr Fico's own party.

Even the European Commission has raised concerns about the move.

"We are here to show our support and solidarity for democracy and the rule of law. Because basically he (the Prime Minister) is corrupting the judicial system here", one protester said. 

"From the outside we are like the beautiful democratic land in Eastern Europe, but if you look inside, it is polluted with crime and oligarchs. That's why I think it is the black hope of Europe," another added.

Robert Fico became Prime Minister for the fourth time last Autumn leading a coalition of left-wing populists and ultranationalists. Critics say his campaign was rife with pro-Russian, anti-Ukraine, anti-American and anti-immigration rhetoric.

Is Fico's return to power a real threat to democracy in Slovakia?

Slovakia is currently ranked 50th out of 180 countries in the Global Corruption Index -its best position in 10 years, said experts at Zastavme Korupciu -and NGO engaged in the fight against corruption. 

But, Xénia Makarová, an analyst and Zastavme Korupciu spokesperson, added that there is not much to be proud of: "Public corruption in Slovakia happens precisely in the areas that our Foundation focuses on, namely public procurement, conflict of interest of politicians when they put their own interests before the public interest, and corruption."

The Prime Minister has labelled NGOs as "foreign agents, thieves and liars," and the government has proposed rerouting their public funding to pensioners instead. Some of the organisations don't know if and for how long they will be able to continue operating.

Some Slovak journalists also accuse the Prime Minister of calling them "prostitutes, snakes and mad." Euronews tried to reach out to the government, but they repeatedly rejected all our interview requests.

The new government has also sent mixed messages about the war in Ukraine. Prime Minister Fico first said that no more weapons would be sent. He has since tempered that approach, but the some 150,000 Ukrainians living in Slovakia are worried. We met some of them at Mareena NGO, where they learn Slovak to better integrate. 

"I'm a little worried about how far down the list of priorities the topic of Ukrainians and Ukrainian inclusion and integration has gone and will be in the coming years," the NGO's director and co-founder Michaela Pobudová admitted.

Slovakia will soon return to the polls, as Presidential elections have been set for 23 March.

US Attack on Yemen Exposes the Lie of Supposed “Rules-Based International Order”


Antony Blinken’s lofty rhetoric about “rules” and “rights” is emptier than ever after Biden’s illegal attack on Yemen.
PublishedJanuary 13, 2024
A Yemeni man inspects a house that was destroyed in an airstrike carried out during the Yemen war by the Saudi-led coalition's warplanes, on February 5, 2021, in Sana'a, Yemen.
MOHAMMED HAMOUD / GETTY IMAGES


Have you heard the one about the U.S. government wanting a “rules-based international order”?

It’s a grimly laughable premise, but the nation’s major media outlets routinely take such claims seriously and credulously. Overall, the default assumption is that top officials in Washington are reluctant to go to war, and do so only as a last resort.

That framing was in evidence when the New York Times published this sentence at the top of the front page: “The United States and a handful of its allies on Thursday carried out military strikes against more than a dozen targets in Yemen controlled by the Iranian-backed Houthi militia, U.S. officials said, in an expansion of the war in the Middle East that the Biden administration had sought to avoid for three months.”

So, from the outset, the coverage portrayed the U.S.-led attack as a reluctant action — taken after exploring all peaceful options had failed — rather than an aggressive act in violation of international law.

On Thursday, President Biden issued a statement that sounded righteous enough, saying that “these strikes are in direct response to unprecedented Houthi attacks against international maritime vessels in the Red Sea.” He did not mention that the Houthi attacks have come in response to Israel’s murderous siege of Gaza. In the words of CNN, they “could be intended to inflict economic pain on Israel’s allies in the hope they will pressure it to cease its bombardment of the enclave.”

In fact, as Common Dreams reported, Houthi forces “began launching missiles and drones toward Israel and attacking shipping traffic in the Red Sea in response to Israel’s Gaza onslaught.” And as Trita Parsi at the Quincy Institute pointed out, “the Houthis have declared that they will stop” attacking ships in the Red Sea “if Israel stops” its mass killing in Gaza.

But that would require genuine diplomacy — not the kind of solution that appeals to President Biden or Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The duo has been enmeshed for decades, with lofty rhetoric masking the tacit precept that might makes right. (The same approach was implicit all the way back to 2002, when then-Sen. Biden chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s hearings that promoted support for the impending U.S. invasion of Iraq. Blinken was the committee’s chief of staff.)

Now, in charge of the State Department, Blinken is fond of touting the need for a “rules-based international order.” During a 2022 speech in Washington, he proclaimed the necessity “to manage relations between states, to prevent conflict, to uphold the rights of all people.” Two months ago, he declared that the G7 nations were united in support of “a rules-based international order.”

But for more than three months now, Blinken has provided a continuous stream of facile rhetoric to support the ongoing methodical killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Days ago, behind a podium at the U.S. embassy in Israel, he defended that country’s actions in the face of abundant evidence of genocidal warfare, claiming that “the charge of genocide is meritless.”

The Houthis are avowedly in solidarity with Palestinian people, while the U.S. government continues to provide massive arms supplies to the Israeli military as it massacres civilians and systematically destroys Gaza. Blinken is so immersed in Orwellian messaging that, several weeks into the Gaza slaughter, he tweeted that the U.S. and its G7 partners “stand united in our condemnation of Russia’s war in Ukraine, in support of Israel’s right to defend itself in accordance with international law, and in maintaining a rules-based international order.”

There’s nothing unusual about extreme doublethink being foisted on the public by the people running U.S. foreign policy. What they perpetrate is a good fit for the description of doublethink in George Orwell’s “1984”: “To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it …”

After news broke about the attack on Yemen, a number of Democrats and Republicans in the House quickly spoke up against Biden’s end-run around Congress, which flagrantly violated the Constitution by effectively going to war on the president’s say-so. Some of the comments were laudably clear, but perhaps none more so than a statement by then-candidate Joe Biden in January of 2020: “A president should never take this nation to war without the informed consent of the American people.”

Like that disposable platitude, all the Orwellian nonsense coming from the top of the U.S. government about seeking a “rules-based international order” is nothing more than a brazen PR scam.

The vast quantity of official smoke-blowing now underway cannot hide the reality that the U.S. government is the most powerful and dangerous outlaw nation in the world.


NORMAN SOLOMON is the national director of RootsAction and the executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His lastest book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, was published in the summer of 2023 by The New Press.
Palestine Has Exposed How Our Governments Work for Their Own Interests, Not Ours

We cannot rely on political bodies whose material interests are at odds with revolution.

By William C. Anderson ,
PRISM
January 13, 2024
Pro-Palestine protesters gather and block the entrance of the New Jersey-bound Holland Tunnel in lower Manhattan demanding Palestinian liberation and a permanent ceasefire on January 8, 2024, in New York City.
MICHAEL NIGRO / PACIFIC PRESS / LIGHTROCKET VIA GETTY IMAGES


Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make a quick donation to Truthout today!

This story was originally published by Prism.

“What happened to the Palestinian nation is a shame to all of us.” – Nawal El Saadawi

The Israeli occupation of Palestine has unfolded into an escalated genocide capturing the world’s attention. Israel’s relentless bombardment of Gaza and repression in the West Bank has led millions to ask, “Why won’t anyone stop this?”

People make societies work, but yielding power to political bodies and institutions for the maintenance of those societies gives rise to a paradox: placing responsibility for revolution and even liberation in the hands of authorities whose interests are diametrically opposed to those goals. Instead, they have the ability to hold us back and distort an international predicament. The problem is that this world, which has been shaped by colonialism and violent dispossession, is not serving us. Palestine shows us why in many ways. So, dissecting U.S. interests and global capitalism and situating solidarity across borders can provide some clarity regarding how we shape a world much different from the one we currently inhabit.

The commercial and political power that allows the U.S. to assert its dominance is fortified by the modern formation of what we know as the “nation-state.” This international order augments itself through monopolies on violence, trade, and movement. After two world wars, an earth that was once organized into traditional empires saw the birth of many new independent nations. National territorial states and the aspirational hopes of sovereignty represented the best intentions of masses of people rising up against colonialism, genocide, and imperialism. Populations around the world rested their dreams for better lives in representation facilitated through statehood. The problems of treating this arrangement of political organization as quintessential for liberation movements are now laid bare.

In many people’s ideal world, the occupation of Palestine would be stopped by a conglomerate of liberated states that oppose Western dominance. It would be disrupted by pan-Arab solidarity against Zionist settler-colonial dominance. People would rise up at the helm of their states, or at least be represented by sincere leaders to push us toward a free Palestine. Global capitalism complicates and prevents this.

Countries are not able to easily intervene on behalf of Palestinian people because of ties negotiated through industry, corporations, and strategic alliances — and that’s if their administrations genuinely want to risk doing so in the first place. So, while we may see millions of people mobilizing around the globe to express their heartfelt allegiance to Palestine, governments often do not reflect the public’s will. Similarly, when we vote politicians into office in the U.S., it is no guarantee they will represent our interests or even acknowledge them. It’s a microcosm of what we see playing out globally.


Ilhan Omar Leads Global Call by Over 400 Parliamentarians for Gaza Ceasefire
The statement was signed by a group of lawmakers hailing from every continent.
By Sharon Zhang , TRUTHOUTJanuary 12, 2024


Appeals to U.S. representatives will ring hollow when they’re bought and paid for by lobbyists who have commitments to Israel. We must ask ourselves what we’re actually appealing to. Do our demands maintain and reiterate this world, or do they make steps toward undoing the colonial trappings we’ve been told can serve us? Anything less than a total transformation may not be enough, but the rapid politicization happening with younger generations, boycotts, and mass demonstrations tell us something significant is shifting.

These actions represent the power of people. However, radical organizers and politics should be brave enough to deal with the possibility that the number of people we thought cared about liberation and mutual aid might be much smaller than we imagine. There are times like these when we see astounding numbers of people ready to take action, only to have the channels they take action through minimize their possible impact.

If we need a recent reference point, we don’t have to look much further than the George Floyd uprisings of 2020. At a moment’s notice, abolition and calls to “defund the police” were swept into an election cycle and became “issues” on the ballot. When it was all said and done, protests died down, and the police got more funding under the auspices of COVID-19 relief and a newly elected democratic administration. The moment we begin trying to funnel this into politicians, political bodies, and the state, momentum can quickly die.

The ruling classes of the world rely on the watering down of our movements as a means of controlling dispersed communities and subjugating oppressed people. The compulsion to create emissaries to fulfill a mandate undermines us at every turn. It leaves us projecting our dreams for a better world onto people, places, and things we shouldn’t. It leads to us placing our hopes in anything that can give us a modicum of disempowered inspiration. We must always remember that true power lies in our collective force and self-determined resistance.

The new year begins with tens of thousands killed by the occupation State of Israel, thousands more unaccounted for under rubble, and 1.9 million displaced and starved. The U.S.-backed siege of Gaza and settler raids in the West Bank will certainly come into play during the upcoming election. Political establishments will use the plight of Palestinian people to sway voters. Scores of elections are set to take place across the globe that have the potential to transform the geopolitical landscape in ways never seen before. Half of the world’s population will be headed to the polls. What’s at stake is not just pivotal in terms of the Israeli occupation, but in the ongoing genocides in Sudan, Tigray, Congo, and elsewhere.

The insurmountable barrier we’re facing is that we the people do not represent ourselves and our interests directly. We shouldn’t have to “pressure” elected officials or governments, ever. This world system we’re enabling and legitimizing here in the U.S. extends its reach through partnerships with other states, including Egypt and Saudi Arabia. What would we all be able to accomplish without regimes like this getting in our way at home and abroad?

The acclaimed Gazan photojournalist Motaz Azaiza may have said it best, “Don’t call yourself a free person if you can’t make changes. If you can’t stop a genocide that is still ongoing.” This is an indictment that should push radicals in the U.S. to consider what it means to respond beyond predictable and controllable methods. Overturning this world system requires a new kind of creative thinking. The final story has not been written yet. There is still time to change the assumed conclusions.

Prism is an independent and nonprofit newsroom led by journalists of color. We report from the ground up and at the intersections of injustice.

Thank you for reading Truthout today. Your interest in bold journalism, outside the mainstream, means the world to us. Just briefly, we must ask for your help.

Truthout is funded almost entirely by its readers – you won’t see advertisements on the side of our website or funding from big corporations. Instead, what you read is powered by readers like you.

As we look to this coming year, we ask that you pledge a donation of any size once monthly to Truthout. Anything you can give ensures that we can continue publishing at this critical time, and you can cancel or change your gift at any time. (Or, you can donate just one time today. No matter what, every single cent makes a difference.)

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.


WILLIAM C. ANDERSON is a freelance writer. His work has been published by the Guardian, Truthout, MTV and Pitchfork, among others. He’s co-author of As Black as Resistance (AK Press 2018).