Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Trump victory in Iowa raises alarm in Berlin: 'High time to prepare'

DPA
Tue, January 16, 2024


Following former US president Donald Trump's victory in the first Republican primary, German politicians have called on the government to prepare for the possibility of another Trump term in office.

"The German government can no longer ignore domestic political developments in the United States. The US is too important a partner for that," Jürgen Hardt, a senior lawmaker from the conservative CDU/CSU opposition bloc, told dpa on Tuesday.

Although many Iowa Republicans did not vote for Trump, Hardt said it is nonetheless "high time to prepare for a president Trump."

Trump's bellicose rhetoric during his first term in office and open scepticism about US foreign commitments such as the NATO alliance caused great concern in Germany and throughout much of Europe.

The prospect of another four years of Trump could have serious implications for Europe, especially if Trump were to reduce US aid for Ukraine.

CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen told the Tagesspiegel newspaper that Germany and the EU must prepare for Trump by ramping up their arms production "so that Ukraine can defend itself against a Russian attack even without US help."

"Europe's freedom depends on this," Röttgen said.

Agnieszka Brugger, vice-chairwoman of the Green Party, said a more radical US policy under Trump would have negative consequences for international security, solidarity and respect for international law.

The current debate in the US Congress on further military aid for Ukraine shows how dangerous isolationism in large parts of the Republican Party is for European security, Brugger said in a statement.




A Wary World Braces for Trump’s Return to the White House

(Bloomberg) -- When Estonia’s much-fêted prime minister, Kaja Kallas, went to Washington in November, she didn’t just meet with White House officials. She also made sure to talk to key allies of Donald Trump.

A month earlier, her foreign minister was in the heart of Trump country, thanking workers at a Lockheed Martin Corp. factory in Arkansas for their contribution to his country’s security — in the form of the HIMARS multiple rocket launchers made there. “It’s important that we take these messages not only to Washington but also to other part of American society, to states that are perhaps a little more conservative,” Margus Tsahkna told reporters.

The outreach is just one example of how countries around the world are delicately — but urgently — preparing for Trump’s possible return to the White House. It’s a reality that’s likely to resonate at this week’s meetings of the global elite in Davos after the former president’s convincing win in the Iowa caucuses further tightened his grip on the Republican nomination, setting up a probable rematch with Joe Biden, who lags in national polls.

Back in 2016, Trump’s election stunned US allies and rivals alike. This time, leaders aren’t taking any chances.

Residents of Washington’s Embassy Row have been scouring the city to meet ex-officials and anyone else close to the former president to get a read on his foreign policy plans. Some have even reached out directly to Trump, massaging his ego, or in Estonia’s case, seeking to head off his habitual complaint that Europe isn’t spending enough on defense.

Others are sounding the alarm publicly. “It is clearly a threat,” European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde told French TV last week, citing the lessons of Trump’s first term.

Few in power are so open. But interviews with government officials from Europe to Asia, Africa and Latin America lay bare their concerns — in some cases, their hopes — about the impact of a Trump reprise, for security, trade, and climate action, and the balance of global power. Most asked not to be named discussing what’s nominally an internal US matter, with the campaign only now picking up and predicted to be tight.

Fears, Hopes

Many US allies are concerned about Trump’s America First rhetoric and threats to pull out of NATO, not to mention his protectionist trade policies. At European Union summits, some leaders are scared to even mention the prospect of his return for fear of making it more likely, one senior diplomat said.

With Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine heading into its third year, 2024 could be a tipping point for Europe’s security, said a Baltic official. In the Middle East, Trump’s unquestioning embrace of Israel has some EU diplomats worried the Gaza war might worsen, fueling a new wave of refugees heading for Europe.

But some nations of the Global South see opportunities in the former president’s more transactional approach.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoyed a personal rapport with Trump and his government preferred the previous administration to Biden’s, which has lectured New Delhi on human rights even as it has sought to enlist its support against China, according to officials. Their fondest hope: Trump picks Indian-American Vivek Ramaswamy as his running mate.

Brazil, which assumed the Group of 20 presidency from India, sees President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s G-20 plans for climate action, poverty reduction and reform of the International Monetary Fund as vulnerable to a resurgent Trump.

Italy’s agenda for its G-7 presidency is similarly affected by the specter of his return. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni also faces a personal and political dilemma, having cheered on Trump while in opposition at an event in Washington in 2019, but in office cultivating a close relationship with Biden.

Perhaps counter-intuitively, the view from Beijing is one of little change in the fundamental trajectory of China-US relations. Wang Yiwei, director of Renmin University’s Institute of International Affairs, noted that tariffs levied during the Trump presidency remain in place, and despite positive signals from last year’s presidential meeting, what he called the US containment of China hasn’t changed, bringing “real harm.”

Trade Worries

In fact, China’s economy would benefit modestly from one of Trump’s signature initiatives, the imposition of 10% across-the-board tariffs on imports and the likely retaliation it would bring, according to estimates by Bloomberg Economics. US growth and employment would slow. Canada and especially Mexico, fellow signatories of the USMCA trade deal, would suffer disproportionately.

Read more from Bloomberg Economics on the terminal.

Canada’s business community sees the USMCA as an existential issue – and it’s due for a joint review in 2026. Still, as a veteran of Trump’s first term, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took care to stay on good terms with him in public while his senior aides forged relationships with Trump’s staff behind the scenes. That gives his team some confidence they can “stick-handle” another Trump presidency, though no one pretends it would be easy.

Mexican officials are having conversations with all camps including people in Trump’s orbit, and see their successful dealings with Trump before on complex topics like trade and migration as giving them confidence they can wrangle him again. What’s more, even though June elections mean a new Mexican president is due to take office in October, a singular focus in Washington on migration at the southern US border is likely to be something of a relief after the Biden administration’s additional interest in democracy, human rights and the environment.

The EU, which engaged in tit-for-tat sanctions with the Trump administration over US tariffs on steel and aluminum, wants to “Trump proof” agreements with the US, though it’s not clear how successful those efforts will be. One senior EU diplomat — who put the chance of a Trump return at 50-50 — said there is a greater awareness of the bloc’s dependencies in energy and raw materials, and the need to address them. His possible return has come up several times at official meetings.

Defense, Security

Many of the most critical — and anxious — voices are to be heard in Europe, where governments are bracing for the potential impact of Trump 2.0 on Russian relations, the Ukraine war and the future of NATO.

Several European delegations have been shuttling to Washington to reach out to Trump’s representatives and to the Heritage Foundation that’s working on his policy platform. The aim is partly to sound out who might be part of his administration to get a better handle on what to expect and to convey the message that Europe is paying its way in defense terms.

Personal ties are seen as key — something former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe grasped from the outset, according to Ichiro Fujisaki, Japan’s ambassador to the US from 2008-2012.

“Abe-san’s way was to play golf and have a lot of time together,” he said. “But then try not to give in but to speak personally about what he needs and what he has done for Trump.”

Still, Trump demanded more money from Tokyo to pay toward the upkeep of US bases in Japan. It’s a return to that quid-pro-quo approach to US security guarantees that worries many governments the most.

Taking no risks, Sweden, Finland and Denmark signed defense cooperation agreements with Washington in December. Finland is buying 64 F-35A fighter jets from the US, and last month announced investments to double artillery shell production.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany, a favorite target of Trump’s in the past, has made no secret of his preference for Biden, and there is anxiety in Berlin over what a new Trump administration could bring. But Germany, too, is finally taking defense spending seriously, stepping up to help Ukraine militarily while deploying troops to the Baltic states. Scholz has said that Germany should be ready to step in if others — read the US — pare back aid for Kyiv.

Others in Europe worry that could come even before a change of administration, as Republican opposition has stalled US support this year.

Opportunities

Some sense a chance: France, which has consistently pushed for a more sovereign Europe in industrial and defense terms, is aware of the paradox that Trump Mark II may provide the best opportunity yet for Europe to overcome national reservations and come together.

The UK sees a possibility of restarting negotiations on a free trade deal with the US that was viewed by Conservatives as the prize of quitting the EU. Having made little progress under Biden, the prospects may be brighter under Brexit supporter Trump.

Trump is any case not much concerned by his European critics. “The last thing we’re really thinking about is a handful of people in Europe,” Chris LaCivita, a Trump senior adviser, said in a roundtable hosted by Bloomberg News in Des Moines, Iowa, when asked about Lagarde’s comments.

Trump enjoyed warm ties with Saudi Arabia, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner has retained and built on his business relations in the United Arab Emirates, including setting up a private company at Abu Dhabi Global Market late last year.

Trump’s temperament is in some ways more in tune with the UAE and other Gulf states, meaning there isn’t much that worries them about the prospect of his return. But the reality is they’re becoming used to volatility in US foreign policy and are moving to solve problems by themselves without relying on Washington.

Sheer unpredictability is an issue for all governments, though: Even Russia bemoans the inability to count on any long-term stable foreign policy strategy by Washington. With the war in Ukraine at a stalemate and likely to remain so this year, Russian eyes are on the US election.

There’s a general sense that things will go better for Putin and his entourage in 2024, with Trump’s re-election one of the main expectations, said a person familiar with the Kremlin’s thinking. Still, after uncontrolled enthusiasm over Trump’s election in 2016 quickly gave way to disappointment that he didn’t deliver more for Moscow, the view this time is cautious. Whatever happens, the person said, the Kremlin will enjoy the spectacle.

--With assistance from Ott Tammik, Milda Seputyte, Aaron Eglitis, Michael Nienaber, Ania Nussbaum, Samy Adghirni, Chiara Albanese, Jorge Valero, Natalia Drozdiak, Alex Wickham, Sudhi Ranjan Sen, Jing Li, Ilya Arkhipov, Henry Meyer, Jasmina Kuzmanovic, Andra Timu, Kati Pohjanpalo, Ewa Krukowska, Selcan Hacaoglu, Ben Bartenstein, Zainab Fattah, Isabel Reynolds, Brian Platt, Laura Dhillon Kane, Max de Haldevang, Simone Iglesias, Martha Viotti Beck, Katarina Hoije and Nancy Cook.

 Bloomberg Businessweek

Congress is failing to deliver on its promise of billions more in research spending, threatening America's long-term economic competitiveness

Jason Owen-Smith, University of Michigan
Tue, January 16, 2024 
THE CONVERSATION

Federal funding was essential to the development of the COVID-19 vaccine. AP Photo/Vincent Thian


The battle to keep the government open may feel just like the crisis of the day. But these fights pose immediate and long-term risks for the U.S.

The federal government spends tens of billions of dollars every year to support fundamental scientific research that is mostly conducted at universities. For instance, the basic discoveries that made the COVID-19 vaccine possible stretch back to the early 1960s. Such research investments contribute to the health, wealth and well-being of society, support jobs and regional economies and are vital to the U.S. economy and national security.

If Congress can’t reach an agreement, then a temporary government shutdown could happen on Jan. 19, 2024. If lawmakers miss a second Feb. 2 deadline, then automatic budget cuts will hit future research hard.


Even if lawmakers avoid a shutdown and pass a budget, America’s future competitiveness could suffer because federal research investments are on track to be billions of dollars below targets Congress set for themselves less than two years ago.

I am a sociologist who studies how research universities contribute to the public good. I’m also the executive director of the Institute for Research on Innovation and Science, a national university consortium whose members share data that help us understand, explain and work to amplify those benefits.

Our data shows how endangering basic research harms communities across the U.S. and can limit innovative companies’ access to the skilled employees they need to succeed.
A promised investment

Less than two years ago, in August 2022, university researchers like me had reason to celebrate.

Congress had just passed the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act. The “science” part of the law promised one of the biggest federal investments in the National Science Foundation – America’s premier basic science research agency – in its 74-year history.

The CHIPS act authorized US$81 billion for the agency, promised to double its budget by 2027 and directed it to “address societal, national, and geostrategic challenges for the benefit of all Americans” by investing in research.

But there was one very big snag. The money still has to be appropriated by Congress every year. Lawmakers haven’t been good at doing that recently. The government is again poised to shut down. As lawmakers struggle to keep the lights on, fundamental research is likely to be a casualty of political dysfunction. The budget proposals released so far fall $5 billion to $7.5 billion short of what the CHIPS act called for in fiscal year 2024. Deal or no deal, science is on the chopping block in Washington.


A lag or cut in federal research funding would harm U.S. competitiveness in critical advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and robotics.


Research’s critical impact

That’s bad because fundamental research matters in more ways than you might expect.

Lagging research investment will hurt U.S. leadership in critical technologies like artificial intelligence, advanced communications, clean energy and biotechnology. Less support means less new research work gets done, fewer new researchers are trained and important new discoveries are made elsewhere.

But disrupting federal research funding also directly affects people’s jobs, lives and the economy.

Businesses nationwide thrive by selling the goods and services – everything from pipettes and biological specimens to notebooks and plane tickets – that are necessary for research. Those vendors include high-tech startups, manufacturers, contractors and even Main Street businesses like your local hardware store. They employ your neighbors and friends and contribute to the economic health of your hometown and the nation.

Nearly a third of the $10 billion in federal research funds that 26 of the universities in our consortium used in 2022 directly supported U.S. employers, including:

A Detroit welding shop that sells gasses many labs use in experiments funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense and Department of Energy.


A Dallas-based construction company that is building an advanced vaccine and drug development facility paid for by the Department of Health and Human Services.


More than a dozen Utah businesses, including surveyors, engineers and construction and trucking companies, working on a Department of Energy project to develop breakthroughs in geothermal energy.

When Congress’ problems endanger basic research, they also damage businesses like these and people you might not usually associate with academic science and engineering. Construction and manufacturing companies earn more than $2 billion each year from federally funded research done by our consortium’s members.
Jobs and innovation

Disrupting or decreasing research funding also slows the flow of STEM – science, technology, engineering and math – talent from universities to American businesses. Highly trained people are essential to corporate innovation and to U.S. leadership in key fields, like AI, where companies depend on hiring to secure research expertise.

In 2022, federal research grants paid wages for about 122,500 people at universities that shared data with my institute. More than half of them were students or trainees. Our data shows that they go on to many types of jobs, but are particularly important for leading tech companies like Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Intel.

More comprehensive numbers don’t exist, but that same data lets me estimate that over 300,000 people who worked at U.S. universities in 2022 were paid by federal research funds. Threats to federal research investments put academic jobs at risk. They also hurt private-sector innovation because even the most successful companies need to hire people with expert research skills. Most people learn those skills by working on university research projects, and most of those projects are federally funded.
High stakes

The last shutdown was the longest in 40 years, but even short delays in research funding have big negative effects on the scientific workforce and lead expert researchers to look outside the U.S. for jobs. Temporary cuts to research funding hurt too because they reduce high-tech entrepreneurship and decrease publication of new findings.

Lasting stagnation or shrinking investments would have even more pronounced effects. Over time, companies would see fewer skilled job candidates, academic and corporate researchers would produce fewer discoveries, and fewer high-tech startups would mean slower economic growth. America would become less competitive in the age of AI. This would make one of the fears that led lawmakers to pass the CHIPS and Science Act into a reality.

Ultimately, it’s up to lawmakers to decide whether to fulfill their promise to invest more in the research that supports jobs across the economy and American innovation, competitiveness and economic growth. Whether the current budget deal succeeds or fails, basic research is on the table and the stakes are high.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and analysis to help you make sense of our complex world.

It was written by: Jason Owen-Smith, University of Michigan.


Read more:


Bringing manufacturing back to the US requires political will, but success hinges on training American workers


Tracing the links between basic research and real-world applications

Jason Owen-Smiths research is supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and Wellcome Leap. He is executive director of the Institute for Research on Innovation and Science (IRIS).

 


Iceland volcano recedes after day of town fires

Updated Mon, January 15, 2024 at 12:32 PM MST

STORY: It was the worst case scenario, said an expert.

Molten lava flows reached the outskirts of the Icelandic town of Grindavik on Sunday (January 14), setting three houses alight, after a volcano erupted for the second time in less than a month.

The town, 25 miles southwest of the capital Reykjavik, was evacuated earlier and there was no immediate danger to people.

By Monday (January 15), the volcano appeared to be significantly less active, despite indications that magma is still flowing underground.

A crack in the earth's surface that opened close to Grindavik was no longer active, said geophysicist Ari Trausti Gudmundsson.

"The danger is that because there is still an influx of magma into the fissure system that a new eruptive fissure opens up either further to the north which is more or less okay but also to the south and that would then be within the borders of the city. Further south, closer to the harbor and if something like that happens much more houses are in real danger. No people, but much more houses and infrastructure."

The Icelandic Meteorological Office said the eruption center is a high-risk area and new fissures could open without warning.

Live video footage on Monday showed glimpses of orange lava still flowing to the surface but at smaller volumes, and further away from the town.

Residents of Grindavik, a town of some 4,000 people before it was first evacuated in November, said it was difficult to watch televized images of the fires.

Jon Gauti Dagbjartsson was evacuated just hours before the latest eruption.

"This is big, this is serious, it's basically as bad as it can possibly get. Although it might get even worse, who knows. So, I mean, I'm born in this town, I actually live in the house that I'm born in and it's a tough thought to think that this town might be over, and I would have to start all over somewhere else."

The Icelandic government will meet on Monday to decide on support for the people of Grindavik.

Iceland's volcanic eruption hits Grindavík

Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK
Mon, January 15, 2024 

An aerial view across volcanic eruption in Iceland.

Iceland is facing a "worst case scenario", the country's police chief has said, as the Reykjanes peninsula experienced its second volcanic eruption in less than a month.

Residents of Grindavík evacuated their homes in the early hours of Sunday morning after "considerable seismic and magmatic activity" was recorded, said RÚV, Iceland's national broadcaster.

The ground level had risen by several centimetres in the days before, "pushed up by magma rising beneath", said Sky News's science correspondent Thomas Moore. "At first it opened a one kilometre gash" that stretched closer to the "thriving fishing town" than December's eruption, he continued – and "then a smaller fissure opened even closer to people's homes".

"Fountains of molten rock and smoke spewed from fissures in the ground," said Reuters, and lava has since "engulfed" a number of homes in the small town, said the Daily Mail.

The magma flow has "bypassed barriers" that were erected last month to protect Grindavík from a further eruption, said Sky News. Prime Minister Katrín Jakobsdóttir has described the situation as "highly serious". President Gudni Johannesson said in a post on X that "no lives are in danger" at present.

Emergency personnel pictured on road as lava flows in the background

An aerial view of lava flowing from fissures on the Rekjyane peninsula

A man is photographed adjusting his camera equipment as lava bubbles in the background

Lava seen spewing from behind a home

Lava seen flowing during the day in this aerial shot

Billowing smoke and lava seen from this aerial shot over Grindavik


Iceland volcano: New eruption sends lava into Grindavik, destroys homes

Steven Yablonski
Sun, January 14, 2024 


GRINDAVIK, Iceland – A state of emergency has been declared in Iceland after a volcano in the southwestern part of the country began to erupt and send lava surging into the seaside town of Grindavík, which had been evacuated after a swarm of earthquakes shook the region overnight and raised fears of an impending eruption. Homes were seen destroyed as the lava flowed into town.

According to the Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO), a series of intense earthquakes began around 3 a.m. local time on Sunday. By just after 6 a.m. local time, the IMO reported more than 200 earthquakes, with a magnitude 3.5 being the strongest recorded.

ACTIVITY AT ICELAND VOLCANO STOPS; SCIENTISTS WARN IT'S TOO EARLY TO DECLARE ERUPTION OVER

The IMO said it received new information showing major changes in GPS measurements and borehole pressure readings during the earthquake swarm.

"These observations, in addition to the ongoing seismicity, confirm magma is moving within the region," the IMO warned before the eruption. "Our assessment is that the possibility of an eruption is high and that it could occur imminently."

Another fissure would open to the southeast of Hagafell Mountain just before 8 a.m. local time, with the southernmost part of that fissure found about a half-mile from the town of Grindavík.

WHAT HAPPENS BEFORE A VOLCANO ERUPTS?

Lava explosions are seen near residential buildings in the southwestern Icelandic town of Grindavik after a volcanic eruption on January 14, 2024. Seismic activity had intensified overnight and residents of Grindavik were evacuated, Icelandic public broadcaster RUV reported. This is Iceland's fifth volcanic eruption in two years, the previous one occurring on December 18, 2023 in the same region southwest of the capital Reykjavik. Iceland is home to 33 active volcano systems, the highest number in Europe. (Photo by Halldor KOLBEINS / AFP)More

According to RÚV, about 200 people were in Grindavík when evacuation orders were issued overnight due to fears of the impending and eventual volcanic eruption.

One resident told RÚV that she didn't notice any earthquakes before going to bed around 1 a.m. local time. However, she was forced awake by the sounds of sirens around 4 a.m. local time, and when she checked her cell phone, she received alerts to evacuate immediately.

She said she wasn't scared, "but my body trembled because it was just so new, and you didn't know how to behave."

ICELAND RESIDENT DESCRIBED RELENTLESS EARTHQUAKES, MOMENTS OF PANICKED EVACUATION

The IMO said a second eruptive fissure opened after noon local time on Sunday just north of town. Lava began to flow from that fissure and entered Grindavík.

Residents of Grindavík watched helplessly as lava quickly approached the town and began to destroy some homes there.

RÚV said at least three homes have been destroyed so far, and there are no signs that new fissures have opened up in town.

"The town had already been successfully evacuated overnight and no lives are in danger, although infrastructure may be under threat," Iceland President Guðni Jóhannesson said on X, formerly Twitter.

Jóhannesson added that no flights into or out of Iceland had been affected by Sunday's volcanic eruption south of the capital of Reykjavík. He's expected to address that nation on Sunday night.

Iceland’s public service broadcaster RÚV reported that both the electrical infrastructure and heating supply pipes had been damaged due to the earthquakes and the lava flow.

CAN ONE VOLCANO'S ERUPTION TRIGGER AN ERUPTION AT ANOTHER VOLCANO?

Original article source: Iceland volcano: New eruption sends lava into Grindavik, destroys homes
Iceland scientists want to drill a hole straight into a reservoir of molten magma about a mile underground. It could generate limitless energy.

Marianne Guenot
Mon, January 15, 2024 

Scientists in Iceland want to drill straight into an underground magma chamber.


The project could offer clues about how volcanoes work, as well as create geothermal energy.


The biggest hurdles are getting funding for the project, and figuring out how to drill into magma.

Scientists in Iceland want to drill a hole into a magma chamber about a mile underground in an attempt to generate limitless energy.

The Krafla Magma Testbed (KMT) aims to create the world's first research center above a magma chamber to monitor, sample, and test the molten rock in situ for the first time.

The center, it hopes, could offer unprecedented insights into how volcanoes work and open new avenues for limitless geothermal energy.

"Magma within the Earth is the last unexplored frontier," KMT's Hjalti Páll Ingólfsson, told Business Insider.


Natural geothermal energy is seen in Hverir Namafjall, in the Krafla fissure, Iceland.Mika Mika
An accidental discovery

Research into magma chambers is crucial. These pools of molten rock, located in the Earth's crust, can create volcanoes if they find a way to reach the surface.

But they are fiendishly difficult to locate with surface equipment and hard to track ahead of an eruption.

"We don't have any direct knowledge of what magma chambers look like, which is crucial in understanding volcanoes of course," Paolo Papale at Italy's National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology in Pisa, who has written on the subject, told New Scientist.

In 2009, scientists identified a potential candidate about 2.5 miles underground near the Krafla in Northern Iceland. So they started drilling.

But about a mile into their descent, their drill got stuck. It's only later, when it came back up carrying shards of volcanic glass, that they realized what happened. They had accidentally poked their head into a magma chamber.

The scientists managed to make a few measurements, but eventually, the wellhead became too warm to operate, per New Scientist.

They decided to pour cold water into the well to cool it down, releasing black, billowing clouds that destroyed their rigging.



Now, 15 years on, KMT wants to drill into the chamber again — but this time it wants to be able to stay, with the help of a few clever engineering tricks.


Getting to the magma with a glassy rock 'sock'

Krafla is a perfect site for this type of experiment. The magma there is ancient and gloopy, which means it's unlikely to create an eruption or flow out of the well when you experiment on it, said Ingólfsson.

Because it's so close to a volcano, any small tremors triggered by the scientists poking into the chamber are unlikely to make an impact, Jon Gluyas, a professor of Earth sciences at Durham University, told BI.

"If you're in Iceland, you're already in an extremely active volcanic region. There's nothing humans can do which materially will alter that one way or the other," said Gluyas.

However, standard drilling rigs can't survive in these conditions.

"It's bloody hot. And that means the materials you'll use for drilling are not right to those sorts of temperatures," said Gluyas.

One big challenge, Ingólfsson said, will be drilling straight into the magma while protecting the equipment.

The solution is fairly simple: freeze the magma solid. Using water, the team aims to freeze the magma ahead of the drill bit. This will create a "sock or a pocket" of frozen glassy rock, similar to the obsidian you can find on Earth, per Ingólfsson.

A flow of obsidian shown in the Landmannalaugar region of IcelandLayne Kennedy/Getty Images

Once that's big enough, the drill bit can be removed, creating a small cavity inside the chamber to deposit some monitoring equipment before the glass sock collapses, per Ingólfsson.

This should allow scientists to get an exact temperature reading of the inside of the magma chamber, which has never been done before, according to New Scientist.

"Will it work? That's definitely a challenge," said Ingólfsson.

"We think we have the equipment, we have the solutions, but it's very difficult to test those or get those accurate unless doing it in a real environment," he said.

Another problem will be keeping the rigging up, a crucial point as KMT wants the boreholes to stay open. The pipes that line the hole need to face extremely high temperatures, as well as acidic environments that can eat at the metal.

"We are working on selecting the right materials and finding out what is the best way to design these things so it will fit and survive," said Ingólfsson.
We know very little about the insides of volcanoes

If it is successful, KMT could offer a whole slew of new insights into volcanic activity, Gluyas said.

"From a scientific perspective, being able to sample an active magma chamber would give you a whole lot of information, which is normally excruciatingly difficult to obtain," said Gluyas, who is the president of the Global Geothermal Energy Advancement Association.

After all, most of what we know about volcanoes is what we see on the surface.

A volcano erupts in Iceland.Hafsteinn Karlsson / Getty Images

But by the time molten rock turns into lava, it has lost a lot of the gas that propelled it up to the surface, so we know very little about magma composition before it erupts.

"I'm sometimes insulting some scientists when I say that basically everything we know about inside of a volcano is kind of a guesstimate — an educated guesstimate of course," said Ingólfsson.

Sampling and monitoring the magma directly could shed crucial information on what it's made of, and hopefully help us find ways to track its path underground. The glassy rock created when freezing the magma could also be a gold mine of evidence, as it could contain bubbles encapsulating the precious magmatic gases, per Gluyas.

"There's loads of fundamental science which will come out of it and there'll be unexpected bonuses, but there is a practical piece of this, which is better understanding of the way the Earth behaves and therefore better preparedness for potential natural disasters," said Gluyas.

KMT plans to drill a second hole dedicated to geothermal research.


A schematic shows the set up for the two boreholes KMT aims to drill in the ground.KMT

Ingólfsson expects one well on a magma chamber could be as productive as 10 other wells elsewhere.

Not only is it very hot down there, but the magma also changes the composition of the rock, which KMT believes could make harvesting geothermal energy more efficient.

"The source of geothermal is always the magma and getting closer to magma is obviously a higher efficiency," said Ingólfsson.

Their research, he said, could inform new ways to collect geothermal energy.

"You have the whole Atlantic ridge offshore. If we combine what we learn in Krafla and with what we know about offshore drilling, then you could foresee, at least as a sci-fi vision, that you could utilize it for abundant or endless energy of the Earth," he said.

Power stations are shown near the site KMT aims to bore into.KMT

For Gluyas, the technology could be promising, but he questioned whether it is needed at this time.

"If you go anywhere where there's a well-developed volcanic province, Mexico, Kenya, Ethiopia, Italy, the geothermal energy is under-exploited massively. I'm not sure how much more efficient systems would be if drilled into a magma chamber," he said.
A short time to get a lot of money

KMT hopes to break ground on the first hole into the magma chamber in 2026. But it still has a long road ahead.

Its biggest challenge is collecting the money to build the research center and start drilling the holes. Ingólfsson estimates that KMT will need to raise upward of $100 million from governmental organizations and industry partners.

"We sometimes say that geology has always been setting up the wrong poker table," said Ingólfsson.

"In space research, you are building telescopes, like for gamma rays, which cost billions of dollars. But in geology, two or 300 million is really expensive," he said.

But Ingólfsson is confident.

"The likelihood of us achieving something magnificent is very high in our opinion," he said.


BURMA/MYANMAR
Welcome to Narcotopia, the CIA-backed drug state standing up to China

Jake Kerridge
Mon, January 15, 2024 

A young girl runs past a Wa State military parade - Lynn Bo Bo/REX

Here’s a book that offers recreational drug users the rare treat of feeling a little virtuous. It’s the story of the Wa highlanders, who have lived in the border mountains between Myanmar and China for centuries. Unlike the Tibetans or the Uyghurs, they have not been bullied by a bigger nation into ceding their autonomy, as they are able to support a well-equipped army on the profits of drug smuggling.

Blessed with cold mountain-soil that’s hospitable to papaver somniferum (the opium poppy), over the last half-century the Wa have manufactured heroin on a massive scale. In 1989, they founded their own autonomous region, Wa State, within Myanmar; it now covers around 12,000 square miles, roughly the size of the Netherlands.

The American journalist Patrick Winn has written an account of how this “forbidden republic hiding in plain sight” has come to “sit at the core of a South-East Asian drug trade generating $60 billion each year in meth[amphetamine] alone”. He identifies the key figure behind Wa State’s prosperity as its treasurer-in-chief Wei Xuegang – “the most successful drug lord of the 21st century so far”.

Wei, a conspicuously nerdy youth among the warrior-like Wa, grew into a logistical genius who devised stratagems for shipping heroin to the eager American market. A renowned germophobe, he has now lived as a recluse for many years in a mansion garrisoned by a hundreds-strong “praetorian guard”. But he still controls Wa State’s drug operations, overseeing the recent pivot to the manufacturing of meth and speed pills.

And yet Wei’s cartel could never have come into existence without the help of an unlikely ally: the CIA. In the 1960s and 1970s, the CIA was prepared to help virtually anyone hostile to communism, and so helped to smooth the way for the Wa people and other mountain-dwellers to export drugs to Thailand – creating, in effect, “a 650-mile-long opium pipeline” – in exchange for intelligence on their Chinese neighbours. At times, Narcotopia reads like a satire from the mind of Joseph Heller, as agents of the US Drug Enforcement Agency, authorised by Nixon to lay elaborate and costly plans to smash the drugs trade, find themselves subjected to veiled threats from mystery men who turn out to be CIA agents trying to cultivate the cartels.

A Wa man sharpening his knife in his village in Shan state - Alamy

Winn tells this complex story with admirable clarity and a healthy dose of humour, and has drawn on a huge range of CIA and DEA documents, “some declassified, others acquired by creative means”. What makes his book sing, however, is his detailed recounting of the dogged heroism of Saw Lu, “the Wa nation’s answer to Ben Franklin”, who granted Winn a series of interviews shortly before being carried off by Covid. In the 1960s, Saw Lu was the Wa warlord who persuaded the various Wa tribes – who, back then, devoted most of their energies to cutting each other’s heads off – to unite against threatened Chinese expansionism.

Later on, noting how little the drug profits trickled down to the ordinary Wa people, Saw Lu plotted with DEA agents to secure a US aid programme in exchange for persuading his fellow Wa leaders to give up smuggling. He was twice arrested for alleged treachery and subjected to weeks of horrifically inventive torture. In a book not overflowing with acts of decency, his almost insanely stubborn altruism is welcome.

Winn is not blind to the faults of the Wa, but notes that, now that the CIA has moved on to making use of drug kingpins in Afghanistan, the rhetoric about Wa State that emerges from the US is bellicose and simplistic: the Wa are viewed as simply one more cartel. No doubt their drugs wreak much misery in the world, but it’s hard to read this book without cheering for the Wa as one of the rare indigenous peoples to have found a method of ensuring they can live undisturbed in their homeland.

Narcotopia is published by Icon at £20.

En.wikipedia.org

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Politics_of_Heroin_in_Southeast_Asia

Air America, covertly owned and operated by the CIA, was used to transport the illicit drugs. The heroin supply was partially responsible for the perilous state ...

Cia.gov

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp75b00380r000600010033-3

THE POLITICS OF HEROIN IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. Document Type: CREST. Collection ... PDF icon CIA-RDP75B00380R000600010033-3.pdf, 101.26 KB. Body: ~ought 5/06: CtIA ...

Renincorp.org

https://renincorp.org/bookshelf/politics-of-heroin-in-south.pdf

* Notes begin on page 385. Page 15. 2. THE POLITICS O F HEROIN IN SOUTHEAST ASIA account for more than 75 percent of America's urban crime.5 After opinion ...


History.wisc.edu

https://history.wisc.edu/people/mccoy-alfred-w

Alfred W. McCoy. The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade.

 New York: Lawrence Hill Books, 2003.

Chicagoreviewpress.com

https://www.chicagoreviewpress.com/the-politics-of-heroin-products-9781556524837.php

The first book to prove CIA and U.S. government complicity in global drug trafficking, The Politics of Heroin includes meticulous documentation of dishonesty ...


Bernie Sanders Says It’s Hard for Voters to Rally Around Biden During Gaza War: ‘President Has Got to Change Course’ on Israel | Video

Stephanie Kaloi
Sun, January 14, 2024 

Sen. Bernie Sanders vehemently insisted on Sunday’s “State of the Union” on CNN that the situation that has unfolded in Gaza since Oct. 7 is “a horrific humanitarian catastrophe.” He told Jake Tapper that President Joe Biden’s support for financially backing Israel during the country’s war with Hamas has made it “very hard for young people, I think for most Americans, to be excited about what is going on right now. The president has got to change course.”

“He has been very clear,” Sanders said. “He has expressed his concern about, quote-unquote, ‘indiscriminate bombing.’ He has asked that Netanyahu, over and over again, to change course. Now, just yesterday, he said, ‘No, we’re going to continue doing what we are doing.’ Unacceptable. You cannot give billions of dollars to a country that ignores your wishes, violates international law.

“So I would hope that the president follows through on his concerns and says to Netanyahu, ‘This is unacceptable. You’re not getting a nickel more from the United States unless you radically change course,'” Sanders said.

Earlier in the segment, Sanders said the war in Gaza is worse than the bombing of Dresden, Germany, in 1945. He explained, “Jacob, I use the word ‘Dresden,’ Germany, to you. You think about the horrible destruction during World War II of that city. What is going on in Gaza now, in three months, is worse than what took place in Dresden over a two-year period. This is a catastrophe.”

“And now, according to the United Nations, after you have 1.9 million people displaced from their homes — they don’t have food, they don’t have water, medical equipment, they don’t have fuel — what you’re looking at is imminent starvation,” he continued. “Children are starving to death.”

Sanders went on, “My view from the beginning has been Israel has a right to respond to this horrific terrorist attack from Hamas, but you do not have a right to go to war against an entire people, women and children. And the United States Congress has got to act, because a lot of this destruction is being done with military weapons supplied by the United States of America.”

To that end, Vermont’s senator is taking action. Sanders has introduced the Foreign Assistance Act, which he explained, “says if American military assistance is given to any country — Saudi Arabia, Israel, any other country — it has got to be used consistent with human rights, international human rights standards, and American law.”

“In my opinion,” Sanders continued, “that is certainly not the case. We have a horrific humanitarian catastrophe. We cannot turn our back on it. Congress has got to start moving it to protect children in Palestine.”

However, Sanders is not convinced he can get 51 votes for the act. He explained, “What we’re trying to do is unprecedented. This is the first time this particular resolution has ever been brought to the floor for a vote. This is the first time we’ve ever seen members of the Congress beginning to stand up to Israeli aid. So it’s going to be a long, hard process, but we’ve got to begin somewhere. This is the beginning.”

The death rate in Gaza is certainly catastrophic. On Thursday, Oxfam International reported that the Israeli military is killing an average of 250 Palestinians per day, a daily death rate that is higher than any other 21st century conflict. On Saturday, the United Nations’ ReliefWeb published a press release from the Euro-Med Monitor that reported 31,497 Palestinians have been killed in the conflict, and approximately 100,000 Palestinians have been killed, reported missing or wounded since Oct. 7.

Of the deaths, 28,951 were civilians, which included 12,345 children, 6,471 women. That includes 295 health personnel, 41 civil defense personnel and 113 journalists.

When asked how else Israel should have responded to the attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, Sanders replied, “Well, Jake, that is a very fair question. And as I’ve said a million times, what Hamas, a disgusting terrorist organization, what they did is unspeakable. And they still are holding over 100 hostages.

“The situation is difficult,” he continued. “It’s a highly dense, densely populated urban area. Fighting there is difficult. No question about it. This is not an easy task to go after Hamas. But you don’t starve hundreds of thousands of children in the process.

“Israel is a very sophisticated military, one of the most sophisticated in the world. It’s not easy, but you don’t destroy an entire people in the process. I think most people would say that’s morally unacceptable,” Sanders concluded.

Bernie Sanders urges Biden to revoke unconstrained financial support for Israel: 'Killing children is not the solution'

Katie Balevic
Sun, January 14, 2024 

Sen. Bernie Sanders says President Joe Biden needs to be tougher on Israel amid the war in Gaza.


Sanders admonished Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu, who recently promised "nobody will stop us."


100 days into war, Israel's retaliation has killed nearly 24,000 Palestinians, 10,000 of them kids.

Sen. Bernie Sanders wants President Joe Biden to speak louder in support of Palestinians in Gaza — or risk his reelection.

"The president has got to change course. He has been very clear. He has expressed his concern about 'indiscriminate bombing.' He has asked Netanyahu over and over again to change course," Sanders told CNN on Sunday.

But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not changed course. On the 100th day of fighting in Gaza, Netanyahu defiantly issued a statement saying, "Nobody will stop us — not The Hague, not the axis of evil, and not anybody else."

On CNN, Sanders called it "unacceptable."

Since war between Israel and Hamas broke out on October 7, many progressives have had to walk a tightrope, balancing longtime loyalty to Israel with a younger generation of American constituents who are sympathetic to the Palestinians and are want an immediate, permanent cease-fire.

"We will see what happens in November because the choice is pretty clear," Sanders told CNN. "There is no question. It is very hard for young people — I think for most Americans — to be excited about what is going on right now."

The US senator from Vermont, who is Jewish and whose Polish ancestors were killed by the Nazis, has long advocated for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In the weeks after Hamas launched its surprise attack on Israel on October 7, killing 1,200 people and kidnapping hundreds of others, Sanders at first rejected the idea of a permanent cease-fire. As Israel's scorched-earth response to the Hamas attacks wore on, and after backlash from his supporters, Sanders has become more critical of Israel, as well as US support for its longtime ally in the Middle East.

In a recent interview with The Guardian, Sanders described the conflict in Gaza as a "mass atrocity."

"If there are any people that have suffered, it's Jewish people. And they should not be imposing that type of suffering on Palestinian children," Sanders told the outlet. "Killing children is not the solution."

Israel's retaliation has killed nearly 24,000 Palestinians — including about 10,000 children, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry. Another 60,000 Palestinians have been reported injured, thousands of homes destroyed, and over 2 million people displaced.

"You cannot give billions of dollars to a country that ignores your wishes and violates international law," Sanders told CNN. "I would hope that the president follows through on his concerns and says to Netanyahu, 'This is unacceptable. You're not getting a nickel more from the United States unless you radically change course. We're not going to see hundreds and hundreds of thousands of children starve to death.'"



 Romanian truck drivers and farmers protest as talks with the government fail to reach an agreement

Associated Press Finance
Updated Mon, January 15, 2024



Romania Protests
Protesting truck drivers slow traffic down of a road leading to Bucharest, in Afumati, Romania, Monday, Jan. 15, 2024. Romanian truck drivers and farmers protested across the country again on Monday as negotiations with the coalition government over lower taxes, higher subsidies and other demands failed to reach any agreements with convoys of lorries and tractors disrupting traffic on the outskirts of Bucharest and other cities throughout the European Union nation. (AP Photo/Andreea Alexandru)

BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — Truck drivers and farmers protested across Romania again on Monday as negotiations with the coalition government over lower taxes, higher subsidies and other demands failed to reach any agreements.

Long convoys of trucks and tractors disrupted traffic on the outskirts of the capital, Bucharest, and other cities throughout the European Union nation. It was the sixth straight day of demonstrations.

Farmers are demanding faster subsidy payments, compensation for losses caused by imports from neighboring Ukraine, and more state aid for fuel costs, among other demands. Truck drivers are calling for lower tax and insurance rates, and have complained about lengthy waiting times at the borders.

Meetings between the protesters and the agriculture and transport ministries were held over the weekend, but no agreements were reached. The demonstrators on Saturday also caused brief blockades at the border with Ukraine in the northeast, Ukrainian border authorities said on Telegram.

On Monday, Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu called for an “urgent drafting” of legislation to resolve the protesters’ complaints.

“We continue to negotiate in good faith with the protesters. We are fully open to dialogue,” Ciolacu said in a meeting with ministers involved in negotiating with the protesters, according to a statement issued by his office.

The Alliance for Agriculture and Cooperation sent a document to the agricultural ministry on Monday listing 15 demands before a planned meeting between the parties later in the day.

An alliance representative said after Monday's talks that the agriculture minister approved many of the farmers’ requests and that the protests would “probably” be suspended. Before the meeting, the alliance had threatened to “urgently initiate” steps to expand the demonstrations if a series of deadlines weren't met.

Romania’s national traffic police advised drivers to avoid areas where protests are being held to help ease traffic flows.