Thursday, February 15, 2024





I'm a Doctor in Gaza. My Clinic Has No SinkPublished Feb 15, 2024 at 3:45 AM ESTUpdated Feb 15, 2024 at 7:34 AM EST


00:58
ICJ Orders Israel To Prevent Genocide In Gaza
By Musallam M. Abukhalil
21



I'm a physician employed by UNRWA, the UN agency responsible for Palestinian refugees. I'm stationed in the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central area of the Gaza Strip and I manage a primary care outpatient clinic in one of the UN shelters.

I live near the shelter where I work. My family was forced to leave our house three weeks ago to go to Rafah because the Israeli army marked major neighborhoods inside the Nuseirat camp as active military zones, so we were extremely fearful for our safety.


Just one month ago, I narrowly escaped death. There was an airstrike near the street where I travel every day to and from work. If I was late home by two minutes, I would have been blown to pieces.

There is a significant personal risk, but because of the new situation in Rafah—Israel is planning to storm in—my family has returned again from living in a tent there to our home in Nuseirat. We are always in constant fear for our safety.

In my clinic, we see close to 150 patients every day. We don't take any days off because the internally displaced people sheltered inside here have continuous medical needs; we work all seven days a week.

The kind of medical problems we see are mainly because of the uncleanliness of the bathrooms shared by hundreds of people. There are many sorts of infectious diseases inside the shelter, including gastrointestinal diarrhoea and respiratory disease, and even infestation of lice.

A Newsweek illustration. Dr. Musallam M. Abukhalil is a doctor in Gaza working from a UN shelter in a school classroom. He says supplies are running short and a lack of water supply 
PHOTO-ILLUSTRATION BY NEWSWEEK/GETTY

We have never seen this before. I have directly observed many cases of young women and children whose scalps are infested with lice.

But we don't have the medical supplies or treatment for them. We don't have anti-lice shampoo to treat them properly; nor do we have a sufficient water supply for them to take regular baths to maintain their personal hygiene.


Personal hygiene is very bad and control of infectious sources is getting worse, largely because so many people from inside and outside of the shelters are sharing bathrooms.

Adding to this complexity, we don't have medicines that can cover the full course of treatment for our patients. For example, instead of giving a patient one full strip, 10 tablets, of anti-fever medication, we give them just four tablets because we don't have enough. Undertreating these patients is a major problem.

Patients aren't getting the same quality and standard of care as before the war. We are working in an extremely challenging situation and I witness it every single day, as do the other shelters.


Because the primary care outpatient clinic is sponsored and run by UNRWA, we get our medical supplies and medicines exclusively from them. We don't have any other international partners or international response mechanisms that can give us medication.

If we run out of medicines from UNRWA, we don't have anything to give our patients. We are entirely dependent on UNRWA and its ability to continue its operations in our shelter.

There is a cluster of UN school shelters around us that also house primary care outpatient clinics like ours, but all of them are dependent on UNRWA, too. It's the only resource we depend on—and it's a critical one. I can't imagine any way our work could continue without it.

We rely on foreign aid. If that's cut off, we don't have anything to feed or treat ourselves with.

It may be shocking to read, but the extreme limitation of medical resources means we don't have an excellent standard of infection control in our clinic, which is a converted classroom. I depend on my personal items; I have my own alcohol scrub and face mask. It's not very well organized, but that's the only way we can handle the situation.


We also don't have our own sink inside the room because it was not designed to have one, so the clinic doesn't have washing water. I do my best to use my alcohol rub before and after treating and seeing patients, but this is dependent on my own resources.

Other than that, I counsel patients on basic hygiene guidance. Sometimes I get laughed at because I'm counseling them on things they cannot provide for themselves. I tell them they have to wash themselves, they need a clean water supply, and so on—everything related to preventative medicine. I always get a sarcastic reply.
Left, Dr. Musallam M. Abukhalil with patients at his makeshift clinic in central Gaza's Nuseirat refugee camp. Right, Palestinians search for survivors in the rubble of a building in Nuseirat on October 31, 2023.
MUSALLAM M. ABUKHALIL/MAHMUD HAMS/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES

But this advice is the only thing I can help people with. Considering what I see, though, the majority of them are not able to follow the advice I give because they don't have access to what they need.

Seeing all this gives me an awful feeling of powerlessness; that I cannot utilize my medical knowledge to provide my patients with the best results that I normally can.

The only solace I can give myself is that many of my patients see improvements in their health because I have a good internal management protocol for these conditions, especially respiratory infections. These can be excellently managed inside my clinic because I have a relatively sufficient supply of resources and many people can follow my advice.

But lice infestation has been my clinic's number one medical problem. Every day, people come to my clinic asking if there is a refill of anti-lice shampoo that I can provide.

It makes me feel bad because I cannot see similar improvements with these patients and others with personal hygiene issues as I have done with respiratory infections.

I consider myself to be a resilient person. I have lived and worked inside Gaza for the entirety of my life. I am 30 years old. I only traveled outside Gaza for a limited amount of time. And because I have been in similar situations, they give me resilience. I always have hope.


I am only concerned with trying to influence the present moment. I do my best to give the highest medical care that I can, and I don't concern myself with the larger picture that only other actors are powerful enough to influence. Politics is extremely outside of our influence.

It gives me optimism to be able to persuade myself that I am a good person who wants to do good in the community that surrounds me, and that's enough for me to stay positive.

I think the Palestinian people, of all people of the world, are resilient and can cope very well. That's my biased opinion.

The most important message I can relay to people outside Gaza is they have to do everything they can to make a ceasefire a reality, now. People are being killed in massive numbers and there is a tremendous amount of misery here.

I fear for the next generation in this continuing conflict because the current situation will be a breeding ground for extremism and radical ideas that will not contribute to the peace-building process.

Dr. Musallam M. Abukhalil (second from right) with his colleagues at their clinic in the central Gaza Strip's Nuseirat refugee camp.
MUSALLAM M. ABUKHALIL

The more that the ceasefire is delayed, the more the formal peace process will be delayed, like it has for many generations.

People must relate to our experience on a personal level by remembering that we all are humans who want to be free and safe; to have enough food and electricity. We are asking for basic human rights. I don't think we are asking for luxurious things or special privileges.

If someone with a clean conscience and a heart full of humanity understands what our message is as Palestinians who live and work in Gaza, then they will be active participants in the political demonstrations asking for a ceasefire.


My last message is this: We need more medical assistance. We need more people to visit us. I want people to come visit my clinic inside this shelter and Nuseirat camp.

I want them to see our work, to see our patients, to see our extensive documentation of these terrible diseases, and to propose ideas for providing more medicine and capacity-building to cope with the growing medical needs of our local communities, who are internally displaced. The majority of people whom I treat are actually from the northern part of Gaza.

Medical assistance and a ceasefire are urgent and must be acted upon now.

Musallam M. Abukhalil is a Palestinian physician in Gaza's Nuseirat refugee camp.

All views expressed are the author's own.


As told to Shane Croucher.

Israel's war on the bodies of Palestinian women

Freed Palestinian prisoner Ruba Assi was welcomed as a hero upon her release in the prisoner exchange deal last November. Screenshot from a video by medyascope english. Fair use.

This article is written by Hala Al Zuheiri, and was originally published in Raseef22 on January 23, 2024. An edited version is republished on Global Voices as part of a content-sharing agreement.

“They took me and my daughter to a room inside the house, and they brought in a female soldier with a police dog. She ordered us to undress completely. We did. I acted blind, deaf, and mute so that they would not beat my son,” Suhad Al-Khamour, 49, from the Dheisheh refugee camp south of Bethlehem, tells Raseef22.

In late November, Suhad’s home was surrounded by a large number of heavily armed Israeli occupation forces (IOF), who then stormed it and destroyed its contents. Suhad, a mother to three sons and a daughter, spoke with Raseef22 about how the armed soldiers kept her husband and son in the living room while she and her daughter were taken into the bedroom at gunpoint and trailed by a guard dog. Suhad and her daughter were forced to undress before redressing and quickly leaving the house. They went out barefoot, waiting in the cold for the questioning of her husband and her son, Mohammad, 26, to conclude. When they came out, the IOF took her son with them, only to release him two hours later.

On December 4, the IOF raided Suhad’s home again before taking Mohammad to Ofer Prison, near Ramallah. This is not Suhad’s first violent targeting by the occupation forces. Her son Ibrahim, 20, is detained at Nafha Prison, where he is completing a 5-year sentence, whereas her son Omar, 14, died in early 2023, after he was shot in the head by occupation forces. Rona, 24, is the only one of Suhad's children still with her at home, although her psychological condition is rapidly deteriorating.

Suhad is just one of hundreds of women who have been arrested or have had family members arrested in the West Bank, Jerusalem, and Gaza, and subjected to various forms of humiliation and violence.

According to the Palestinian Prisoners Club and the Commission of Detainees’ Affairs, about 300 female prisoners were arrested in 2023, including 184 after October 7, 2023. 

Since October 7, Israel has escalated its campaign of illegal arrests and its targeting of women's bodies through tortureabusestrip searches, forcefully removing veils, in addition to starvation, depriving them of basic needs, and detaining them in harsh conditions in prisons and compounds. 

Testimonies from Gazan female prisoners similarly reveal use of the same tools of humiliation. Many civilians have been forcibly taken prisoner by occupation forces, and their whereabouts are still unknown.

Reinforcing the occupation by violating the body

Ruba Assi was released on November 28, 2023, in the fifth part of the prisoner exchange deal between Hamas and Israel. Assi spoke with Raseef22 about her arrest after October 7. It was significantly more violent and humiliating than her first arrest and detention in 2020, which lasted for 21 months.

Shortly after the start of the war on Gaza, the IOF blew open the door of Assi’s house in the town of Beit Liqia, west of Ramallah, in the West bank, and stormed inside. Family members were separated into different rooms, and Assi was arrested without being allowed to say goodbye to her family or even wear a jacket. 

Occupation forces tied and blindfolded her, before dragging her into a military vehicle. The female soldier assigned to her spoke loudly and aggressively in Hebrew, intentionally provoking her. She also threatened to send her to Gaza to torture her there. After Assi arrived at the Israeli camp, still bound and blindfolded, a group of soldiers approached her, taunting her and insulting her.

She was later transferred to the Hasharon Detention Center, where she was subjected to a strip search by two female guards. “If the prisoner refuses [the search], she will be severely beaten,” Assi explained. Eventually, Assi was placed in solitary confinement at Damon Prison. She shared:

There was not enough food or water. We were deprived of bathing and subjected to violent oppression without any prior justification and at any time. We were deliberately neglected in terms of medical care, and existing health conditions were not taken into account. Even when we were preparing to be released after our names were included as part of the exchange deal, we were subjected to strip searches.

Many testimonies from released female prisoners reveal torture, abuse, beatings and threats, include threats of rape, as well as being taken hostage in order to pressure family members to turn themselves in. Palestinian civilians are also subjected to these methods of torture during home raids, at Israeli checkpoints, and during visits to detained family members.

A longstanding policy

Strip searches are not a new tool of suppression and humiliation for Israel, but they have recently emerged as an integral part of the ongoing violent crusade against and genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

Ismat Mansour, a former prisoner and expert on Israeli affairs, told Raseef22, “In Gaza, we saw how men were stripped down and filmed, in order to strip the person from within and instill a sense of inferiority and helplessness.” Mansour labels strip searches a tool of the occupation used to violate the privacy and desecrate the space of Palestinians, while diminishing their humanity. It is a deeply intentional measure.

The Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association similarly confirmed to Raseef22 that the policy of strip searching is not new. However, since the start of the ongoing war on Gaza, the violence accompanying physical inspections has blatantly increased, according to testimonies from released female prisoners. 

Workers at Addameer confirmed, “Female prisoners are subjected to a strip search at the moment of their arrest and at the detention center, and sometimes they are ordered to sit in a squatting position. Male prisoners are also subjected to this– a tool to seize control of the detainee’s body and humiliate and violate their dignity.” Testimonies recorded after October 7 indicate that female prisoners have been threatened with rape and verbal harassment.

Hassan Abed-Rabbo, spokesman for the Commission of Detainees’ Affairs, believes that “this is primarily intended to undermine and harm national and human dignity, as well as to send a message to all Palestinian women that anyone thinking of acting against the occupation will have her dignity violated and her privacy invaded.” He emphasized, “it is an attempt to pressure women and sideline them from their role in the struggle.”

Who will hold Israel accountable for violating women's bodies?

Dr. Dalal Iriqat, an international law specialist, explained to Raseef22, “When violations against prisoners are systematic and repeated, and laws safeguarding prisoners’ rights are continuously violated, the policy, according to international and legal definitions, escalates into a war crime against humanity.”

Iriqat emphasized that the policy of strip searches violates international law and the Fourth Geneva Convention, stressing that the violations are not limited to this policy but also include depriving female prisoners of basic rights, such as food and a healthy environment. “The Israeli authorities took advantage of the preoccupation of human rights organizations about war crimes in Gaza to further abuse and torment the prisoners,” says Iriqat.

The Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor called on the international community to pressure Israel to reveal the fate of Gazan women who have been arrested and whose whereabouts are unknown. Approximately 3,000 Palestinian detainees from Gaza have disappeared, including children and minors. The Human Rights Monitor claims that the Israeli army continues to arrest dozens of women, girls, and infants, all of whom are subjected to humiliating detention conditions, strip searches, the forced removal of their hijab, and threats of rape.

The Palestinian Prisoners Club and the Commission of Detainees’ Affairs state that the intensity of the crimes committed against women is one of the most prominent and dangerous aspects at this stage in the war. This violence is an extension of a long history of Israeli targeting of Palestinian women; Will this war on Gaza be much harsher than any of the previous wars in the history of the occupation?

Palestinian health minister warns of humanitarian catastrophe at Khan Younis hospital

Israeli army lays siege around Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza Strip, orders evacuation of the complex


Qais Abu Samra |15.02.2024 -
Israeli attacks on Gaza continue ( Ahmed Zaqout - Anadolu Agency )

RAMALLAH, Palestine

Palestinian Health Minister Mai Alkaila warned Thursday of an imminent humanitarian catastrophe at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis city in southern Gaza Strip.

The Israeli army has laid a siege around the hospital and ordered the evacuation of the complex.

The army reportedly gave thousands of displaced Palestinians inside the complex until 7:00 a.m. local time (5:00 GMT) to evacuate the hospital, according to witnesses.

Israeli forces stormed the hospital early Thursday, triggering panic among displaced people and patients, witnesses said.

On Wednesday, at least one Palestinian was killed and several others injured in an Israeli attack on the hospital’s orthopedics section.

"This is a new crime being committed by the Israeli occupation against our people in the Gaza Strip,” Alkaila said in a statement.

She appealed to the United Nations to intervene to “halt Israeli crimes” at Gaza’s hospitals.

"The displaced sought refuge at the hospital to escape the Israeli aggression,” Alkaila said. “There is no safe place in the enclave.”

Since Jan. 22, Khan Younis has witnessed a massive Israeli ground invasion, forcing tens of thousands of the city's residents to flee under heavy Israeli bombardment.

Israel has pounded the Gaza Strip since an Oct. 7 Hamas attack, killing at least 28,576 and causing mass destruction and shortages of necessities. Nearly 1,200 Israelis are believed to have been killed in the Hamas attack.

The Israeli war on Gaza has pushed 85% of the territory's population into internal displacement amid acute shortages of food, clean water and medicine, while 60% of the enclave's infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, according to the UN.

Israel stands accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice, which in an interim ruling in January ordered Tel Aviv to stop genocidal acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.

*Writing by Mohammad Sio
US Conducts ‘Thorough Assessment’ of Israel's Targeting of Civilians

Smoke rising from Khan Yunis after an Israeli attack (Reuters)

Washington: Ali Barada
-15 February 2024 AD Ù€ 04 Sha’ban 1445 AH

The US administration confirmed that it seeks to "thoroughly assess reports" of Israeli civilian harm by authorized recipients of US-provided defense.

The assessment aims to develop appropriate policy responses and drive partners to conduct military operations following international humanitarian law.

The Biden administration has faced criticism for its continued supply of weapons to Israel, with increasing accusations that US-made weapons are being used in attacks that have killed or injured civilians.

US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller was subjected to a barrage of questions regarding the killing or wounding of several Palestinians who hold US citizenship or other innocent people.

Miller said: "We seek to thoroughly assess reports of civilian harm by authorized recipients of US-provided defense articles around the world, including under the Civilian Harm Incident Response Guidance (CHIRG)."

He reported that the US is reviewing incidents in the current conflict according to the process set out in the CHIRG.

CHIRG was established in August last year, just weeks before the Hamas attack on Oct. 7. The guidance sets out a process by which State Department officials investigate specific incidents where US weapons may have harmed civilians.

- 50 incidents

Miller did not specify when the CHIRG process was initiated or how many incidents were being reviewed. But a source familiar with the process said the department was looking at least 50 reported incidents of civilian harm.

"That process is not intended to function as a rapid response mechanism," Miller said.

"Rather, it is designed to systematically assess civilian harm incidents and develop appropriate policy responses to reduce the risk of such incidents recurring in the future and drive partners to conduct military operations according to international humanitarian law."

Miller called on Israel to be held accountable for the killing of US citizens.

"We are monitoring the evolving situation in Gaza. We examine the facts as they are available to us, but I don't have any assessment about those particular strikes," he said.

"But it would in no way change our conclusion, which is that the Government of Israel before it launches any military operation in Gaza – or I'm sorry – in Rafah, needs to have the plan to deal with the humanitarian situation there."

He believed that the Israeli government asked to develop such a plan.

"We think that's appropriate. And we think that once that plan is developed, it needs to be credible, and it needs to be one that they can execute."

- Are there any restrictions?

The process is separate from assessments the State Department sometimes undertakes to determine whether atrocities, including crimes against humanity or even genocide, have been committed in a conflict.

In response to reports that Israel prevented the entry of a shipment of flour from the US, the spokesman said: "We have funded flour that would provide food for 1.5 million Gazans for five months. It is critical that this flour make it to Gaza."

"We had a commitment from the Government of Israel to let that flour go through, and we expect them to deliver on that commitment."

Last week, Biden issued a new national security memorandum that requires countries receiving US security assistance to provide assurances that they will comply with international law and not restrict aid access in conflicts.

The memorandum also requires the Departments of State and Defense to report to Congress whether US-funded weapons have been used in a way inconsistent with international law or with established best practices for preventing civilian harm.

- UNRWA investigation

In response to a question about the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and whether or not Washington will resume its funding, Miller refused to speculate on what Congress might do, but he noted: "We support the work that UNRWA does, not just in Gaza but everywhere else where it operates because it provides humanitarian assistance that is critical."

"The United States has been the largest funder of humanitarian assistance to Palestinians, and we expect to continue funding humanitarian assistance to Palestinians."

The Biden administration "will explore any available alternatives to ensure that humanitarian assistance can continue to flow from the United States to innocent civilians who need it."

He stressed that the suspension of additional funding for UNRWA was done in "good faith because we think it's important to see the results of the investigation."

"It's a legitimate thing for other countries to want to wait and see the investigation results and how UNRWA responds to that investigation."
Palestinian writer Randa Jarrar dragged out of PEN America event for protesting

Jarrar protested against special guest Mayim Bialik, Gaza ceasefire opponent



Image by Daniel José Older. The piece portrays Randa Jarrar being dragged out of the event for protesting by calling out the names of the 13 authors martyred in Gaza. The list of names is displayed prominently on top of the image. Used with permission.

This article was originally published in the New Arab on February 2, 2024. An edited version is republished on Global Voices as part of a content partnership agreement.
Written by The New Arab
Written by Global Voices MENA
Posted 8 February 2024 

PEN America, an organization dedicated to championing free speech, kicked out Palestinian American writer Randa Jarrar after she disrupted an event that platformed a well-known Zionist celebrity.

Despite its focus on defending at-risk writers and journalists, PEN America, as part of the PEN International network spanning 100+ countries, has failed to acknowledge the killing of over 130 wordsmiths in Gaza since October 7.

Most recently, the organization invited self proclaimed Zionist and ceasefire opponent, Mayiam Bailik, to host a conversation with comedian Moshe Kasher about his new memoir at the PEN Out Loud event in Los Angeles. Bailik has faced “intense” criticism for her social media post trivializing the war in Gaza, which has resulted in the killing of more than 27,840 Palestinians, with 70 percent being women and children, in addition to 1,139 Israelis. Bailik’s post prompted journalist David Ehrlich to comment: “Truly some of the most demented s*** I’ve ever seen on this or any website.”

Pen America's decision sparked anger in the literary community and led to two prominent writers severing ties with the organization ahead of the event. National Book Award finalist Angela Flournoy, and O. Henry Prize winner Kathleen Alcott, both withdrew their support in response to Bailik's involvement.

The organization proceeded with the event despite the controversy.

Six writers associated with Writers Against the War on Gaza (WAWOG), including Author Randa Jarrar, attended the PEN Out Loud event. They disrupted the event by playing the names of the 13 writers and poets killed by Israel in Gaza since October 7 using a loudspeaker, while also objecting to Bailik being given a platform.

The protesters were asked to leave, and, when Jarrar refused, she was dragged out of the event. The incident was captured in video footage that went viral on social media. In the video, Jarrar can be seen being dragged out of the event by force, as she remained seated on her chair.

Following the event, PEN America issued a statement expressing their “regret” for having to remove the protestors for the event to proceed. However, the organization has yet to make a public statement about those 13 writers, as well as the 122 journalists and 100 academics that have also been killed by Israeli forces since October.

Environmental Justice Foundation seeks a solution with the Dase app to battle illegal fishing

Written byLeocadia Bongben
Posted 15 February 2024 



Fishermen learning how to use Dase app. Photo by EJF, used with permission.

As darkness gradually descends, a boat finds itself in an unsettling encounter with a trawler.

The government-approved military personnel aboard the trawler menacingly brandish their guns toward our boat. “Hastily, we raise our hands in surrender, shouting on top of our voices that we were not pirates, but a community surveillance and monitoring group,” Stephen Zacheus Nodem, the President of Mouanko Fishermen Association, narrated the harrowing incident off the coast of Mouanko in the Sanaga Maritime Division, Littoral region of Cameroon.

“As our boat speeds away, we notice the crew on the trawler dumping dead fish into the waters near the coast,” added the fisherman.

This incident is an illustration of trawler incursion and destructive, irregular, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing in the vicinity of the Douala-Edea Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).


Mouanko -Sanaga-Martime-Littoral Region. Photo by Leocadia Bongben, used with permission.

According to Global Voices, investigations reveal that not only do EU-registered vessels use flags of convenience to conceal IUU fishing practices, but they also overexploit and export small pelagic fish in Cameroon waters.

As emphasized in a report by the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF), destructive fishing (IUU fishing) threatens marine environments and the people who rely on them. The report further highlighted that small-scale fisheries contribute significantly, employing 90 percent of those engaged in capture fisheries. Furthermore, IUU fishing deprives countries of their marine resources and undermine efforts to sustainably manage fisheries.

To stop the erosion of the marine coastal ecology, Cameroon established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in 2018. Despite this initiative, experts note that trawler incursions into MPAs have been persistent, resulting in the devastation of fish populations, marine habitats, and artisanal fishermen's equipment. This not only threatens the livelihoods of local communities but also poses a risk to the entire coastal ecosystem.

The capacity of Cameroonian ministries overseeing the industry, including Livestock and Fisheries, as well as Forestry and Wildlife, is severely limited in their ability to effectively prohibit and deter industrial trawlers from intruding into these protected areas.

In light of this, EJF is collaborating with the government to provide community-based surveillance assistance, aiming to prevent illicit fishing operations, especially incursions by industrial trawlers, within the Douala-Edéa National Park's marine protected area.

With funding from Ocean 5, a three-year project focused on efficient MPAs and combating illegal industrial trawling in Cameroon was launched in 2022. EJF, in partnership with the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife and the Cameroon Wildlife Conservation Society (CWCS), is actively working to establish robust community-based surveillance. An additional project has assisted the government in amending the legislation to include provisions for collaborative monitoring.
Cameroon- Dase App to document destructive fishing

To enhance community monitoring and surveillance efforts, EJF introduced the Dase Cameroon app in late 2023. The name Dase means evidence, and it originates from the Fante dialect spoken in Ghana, where the app was first launched.

Dase is a smartphone application developed and maintained by EJF, enabling users to capture video or photo evidence of destructive IUU fishing in real-time, regardless of internet connection.


DASE Cameroon app. Photo by EJF, used with permission.

Explaining the functionality, Steve Trent, EJF's director, said, “Users simply need to open the Dase app on the Collect software platform, take a photo of the boat with its name or identification number visible, and record the position when observing a vessel damaging canoes, gear, or engaging in unlawful fishing. The software then automates the process by submitting the report to a central database, empowering authorities to make arrests or impose sanctions on perpetrators.”

He added that the software is tailored to meet local requirements, enabling fishing communities to take proactive measures to safeguard the environment and their vital resources. EJF provided comprehensive training on the utilization and protection of the app before its deployment to fishermen, complemented by prior courses on maritime safety and first aid. Additionally, the organization distributed safety vests, life jackets, binoculars, and watertight pouches to protect fishermen's phones during the distribution process.


The fishermen receive training on first aid and safety at sea. Photo by EJF, used with permission.

Orimisan Omoruy, the head of the Mbiako fishermen's organization, expressed appreciation for the Dase app, stating, “The knowledge and experience will help us report trawler incursions and help protect our main source of livelihood as well as our fishing equipment.”

Acknowledging the impact of the acquired knowledge, Eitel Pandong, conservator of the Douala-Edéa National Park, remarked, “With the knowledge we've gained, I believe we'll be able to strengthen our surveillance efforts to detect and deter IUU fishing and other illicit activities in the Douala-Edéa National Park.” He emphasized the need for increased operational capacity for more effectiveness.

The fishermen also urged EJF to follow up on information supplied by them and requested assistance from EJF in regaining their ruined equipment from trawlers.

The Dase app has proven effective in combating IUU fishing in Ghana, Liberia, and Senegal, where several small-scale fishermen and local authorities have joined forces to fight against IUU fishing.

To eradicate IUU fishing, local authorities must support the app's main functions and collaborate with the government and other partners. In light of this, on October 20, 2023, Cyrille Yvan Abondo, the chief divisional officer for the Sanaga-Maritime, signed a document establishing the first-ever participatory commission to supervise IUU fishing.

EJF is also a founding member of the Coalition for Fisheries Transparency and has educated journalists in Cameroon to cover fisheries-related stories. As part of this alliance, the foundation supports the Global Charter for Transparency, endorsed by Steve Trent, as a collection of feasible, cost-effective measures to bring fisheries into the open and ensure a healthy, safe ocean.

It is also worth noting that EJF has assisted Cameroon in revising its outdated 1994 fishing legislation, contributing to measures aimed at reversing the EU red flag and the ban on fisheries products from Cameroon in 2023.

The Elders and Future of Life Institute release open letter calling for long-view leadership on existential threats




15 February 2024

On 15 February 2024, The Elders and the Future of Life Institute released an open letter calling on world leaders to show long-view leadership on existential threats.

Sign and share the open letter here.

This letter was published in English but is also available in Spanish (Español), French (Français), German (Deutsch), Portuguese (Português), Arabic (العربية) and Chinese (中文).


The open letter

Our world is in grave danger. We face a set of threats that put all humanity at risk. Our leaders are not responding with the wisdom and urgency required.

The impact of these threats is already being seen: a rapidly changing climate, a pandemic that killed millions and cost trillions, wars in which the use of nuclear weapons has been openly raised.

There could be worse to come. Some of these threats jeopardise the very existence of life on earth. We do not yet know how significant the emerging risks associated with Artificial Intelligence will be.

We are at a precipice.

The signatories of this letter call on world leaders to work together to address these existential threats more decisively. We welcome people of all communities, generations, and political views to join us in asking for courageous decision-making - for the sake of our common future.

The knowledge and resources to address these challenges exist. But too many of our leaders lack the political will or capability to take decisive action. They seek short-term fixes over long-term solutions.

In a year when half the world’s adult population face elections, we urge all those seeking office to take a bold new approach. We need long-view leadership from decision-makers who understand the urgency of the existential threats we face, and believe in our ability to overcome them.

Long-view leadership means showing the determination to resolve intractable problems not just manage them, the wisdom to make decisions based on scientific evidence and reason, and the humility to listen to all those affected. Long-view leaders must have the moral strength to address both current concerns and long-term risks, often at the expense of vested interests.

Such values should be common to all political leaders. But they are woefully missing in so many. We need leaders, women and men, who consistently demonstrate the courage to:

1. Think beyond short-term political cycles and deliver solutions for both current and future generations.
2. Recognise that enduring answers require compromise and collaboration for the good of the whole world.
3. Show compassion for all people, designing sustainable policies which respect that everyone is born free and equal in dignity and rights.
4. Uphold the international rule of law and accept that durable agreements require transparency and accountability.
5. Commit to a vision of hope in humanity’s shared future, not play to its divided past.

These principles of long-view leadership can inform urgent changes in policy. Governments can get to work now to agree how to finance the transition to a safe and healthy future powered by clean energy, relaunch arms control talks to reduce the risk of nuclear war, save millions of lives by concluding an equitable pandemic treaty, and start to build the global governance needed to make AI a force for good, not a runaway risk.

As leaders prepare to gather in New York in September for the UN Summit of the Future, it is time to change direction. The biggest risks facing us cannot be tackled by any country acting alone. Yet when nations work together, these challenges can all be addressed, for the good of us all.

Despite the seriousness of these existential threats, hope remains. Our best future can still lie ahead of us. We call on leaders to take the long view, and show the courage to lead us to that better future.


Join the call for long-view leadership
Sign and share the open letter on Future of Life's website


Signatories include:

Elders

Mary Robinson, Chair of The Elders and former President of Ireland

Ban Ki-moon, Deputy Chair of The Elders and former UN Secretary General, Republic of Korea

Graça Machel, Deputy Chair and co-founder of The Elders, Founder, Graça Machel Trust, Mozambique

View the full signatory list on the Future of Life website.


What is long-view leadership and why are Elders calling for it?

BAN KI-MOONMARY ROBINSON


15 February 2024

The Elders believe a bold new approach to decision-making is needed to urgently address the existential threats faced by humanity. But what does ‘long-view leadership’ look like

The climate and nature crises, pandemics, nuclear weapons and the emerging risks of AI - we face a set of threats that put all humanity in jeopardy. The Elders believe world leaders are not responding with the wisdom and urgency required, and are calling for a bold new approach to these existential threats.

The impact of these threats is already being seen. Whilst the knowledge and resources to address these challenges exist, too many of our leaders lack the political will or capability to take decisive action.

This is why The Elders are calling for ‘long-view leadership’. We need decision-makers who understand the urgency of the existential threats we face, and believe in our ability to overcome them.

Principles of long-view leadership

Long-view leadership means showing the determination to resolve intractable problems not just manage them, the wisdom to make decisions based on scientific evidence and reason, and the humility to listen to all those affected.

Long-view leaders must have the moral strength to address both current concerns and long-term risks, often at the expense of vested interests.

The Elders propose five principles of long-view leadership. Decision-makers must consistently demonstrate the courage to:Think beyond short-term political cycles and deliver solutions for both current and future generations.
Recognise that enduring answers require compromise and collaboration for the good of the whole world.
Show compassion for all people, designing sustainable policies which respect that everyone is born free and equal in dignity and rights.
Uphold the international rule of law and accept that durable agreements require transparency and accountability.
Commit to a vision of hope in humanity’s shared future, not play to its divided past.

An open letter calling for long-view leadership on existential threats

On 15 February 2024, The Elders and the Future of Life Institute launched a combined call for long-view leadership in an open letter to world leaders.

The letter was co-signed by a diverse global coalition from politics, civil society, science, philanthropy, activism and the arts. Over 150 global leaders, experts and public figures from nearly 60 countries came together to urge decision-makers to collaborate on bold, practical solutions to combat the ongoing harms and escalating risks faced by humanity.

The letter welcomes people of all communities, generations, and political views to join the call for courageous decision-making. Sign the open letter here.

Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland, and Chair of The Elders:


“Our world is in grave danger, but with long-view leadership rooted in truth, justice and inclusion, we can still step back from the precipice. This does not mean global decision-makers should neglect the challenges we face today; it means making decisions that go beyond short-term politics and delivering solutions for people struggling now, as well as future generations. This is entirely possible: if nations work together, our best future can still lie ahead of us.”

Ban Ki-moon, former UN Secretary-General and Deputy Chair of The Elders:


"The range of signatories to this open letter makes clear our shared concern: we need world leaders who understand the existential threats we face and the urgent need to address them. This can only be done through decisive cooperation between nations. We need to revitalise multilateralism for the sake of our common future. This means upholding the international rule of law and being open and accountable for the decisions we must take. When nations work together, these challenges can all be addressed, for the good of us all.”

Max Tegmark, president and founder, Future of Life Institute:


“Global leaders have a critical opportunity to turn the course of human history away from disaster, towards inspiring, shared futures. We've risen together to meet such crises before, from banning bioweapons to rebuilding the ozone layer, and we can do so again now. With effective governance and intentional cooperation, we can combat both ongoing harms and rapidly escalating risks, while ensuring that the benefits of transformative technologies such as AI are shared by everyone.”

Two Chinese fishermen drown after chase by Taiwanese coastguard

The incident happened near the Kinmen archipelago which lies between Taiwan and China.


Taiwan coastguard Taiwanese coastguards inspect the vessel that capsized during a chase off the coast of Kinmen archipelago 
(Taiwan Coast Guard Administration via AP) 

By Huizhong Wu, Associated Press
February 15, 2024 

Two Chinese fishermen have drowned while being chased by Taiwan’s coastguard off the coast of Taiwan’s Kinmen archipelago, the coastguard has said.

The deaths are unusual despite the level of Chinese activity in the waters near Kinmen, which is closer to China than it is to Taiwan’s main island.

China claims all of Taiwan as part of its territory.

China’s Taiwan affairs office strongly condemned the deaths and called for an investigation, saying “such a malicious event during the spring festival seriously hurts the feelings of compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait”.

The statement accused the ruling Democratic Progressive Party in Taiwan of using “all sorts of excuses to forcefully inspect Chinese fishing vessels, and using violent and dangerous methods towards Chinese fishermen”.

The unnamed Chinese vessel had been sailing about one nautical mile off the coast of an islet of Kinmen island, Taiwan’s coastguard administration said in a statement.

The Chinese vessel attempted to flee but capsized.

Four fishermen fell into the water and two survived and are in “good shape”, while resuscitation efforts on the other two failed, the vice captain of the coastguard in Kinmen, Chen Jien-wen, told a local TV channel.

The coastguard said the case has been reported to the Kinmen prosecutor’s office, and the fishermen’s families were being contacted via official channels.

Taiwan’s head of the mainland affairs council, Chiu Tai-san, who oversees the island’s relations with China, told reporters on Thursday morning that “we keep a certain level of contact with the other side and our coastguard, and will promptly let them know of related developments”.

Kinmen is in the Taiwan Strait that separates China and Taiwan. From some parts of the archipelago, the southern Chinese city of Xiamen is visible to the naked eye.

Kinmen residents in recent years have reported seeing an increase in sand dredger vessels from China, which take sand from the ocean floor, as well as fishing ships, close to its coast.

At times, dozens of the ships can be seen from the island.

Why China Isn’t Blowing Up Over the Deaths of Fishermen That Taiwanese Forces Chased Away
Handout photo of Taiwanese authorities inspecting a Chinese fishing boat near Kinmen on Feb. 14, 2024.Taiwan Coast Guard Administration
TIME
FEBRUARY 15, 2024 

Two Chinese fishermen drowned off the coast of Kinmen, a group of islands that sit just six miles from mainland China, after being chased by Taiwanese maritime forces on Wednesday—marking what Taiwan’s Coast Guard Administration says is the first of its actions to have caused deaths. But China’s response to the tragedy, which some suggested could be used to escalate tensions already simmering around the island’s sovereignty, has been uncharacteristically restrained.

A Taiwanese coast guard statement Wednesday said the unnamed, mainland-China-registered boat had crossed a maritime border and failed to stop for inspection, instead speeding away from its patrol. The fishing boat capsized during the pursuit and four of its crew members fell into the sea, two of whom were rescued while the other two lost consciousness and died.

China was not happy. Zhu Fenglian, spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council in Beijing, condemned Taiwan for “such a vicious incident,” which also, China noted, happened during Lunar New Year celebrations. Zhu blamed Taiwan’s Democratic People’s Party—which is pro-independence and recently won another presidential term leading the island—alleging that its officials have long mistreated fishermen from the mainland and forcefully and dangerously seized mainland fishing boats, a pattern it claims led to the recent deaths.

“We warn the relevant parties in Taiwan to respect the historical fact that fishermen from both sides of the Taiwan Strait operate in the traditional fishing areas of the Taiwan Strait and ensure the personal safety of mainland fishermen, effectively preventing the recurrence of such incidents,” said Zhu.

Taiwan’s coast guard said that fishing boats, such as the one in question this week, that have “no name, no ship certificate, and no ship registration” are “a common concern of cross-strait collaborative law enforcement,” Taiwan’s government-owned Central News Agency reported.

“We deeply regret that the mainland crew refused to cooperate with our law enforcement work and this unfortunate incident occurred,” Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council said in a statement on Thursday.

The deaths sparked outrage among the Chinese public. On Weibo, posts about the incident have garnered over 50 million views. In particular, some social media users are taking the chance to air nationalist sentiments, calling for retaliation against Taiwan, which Chinese authorities have long claimed—sometimes with threats of violence—as part of China.

“This is blatant provocation,” one Weibo user wrote, in a post that has garnered over 1,500 likes. “If it’s not possible to attack Taiwan now, it’s not difficult to severely punish Taiwan’s for its evil deeds, given our current strength.”

China’s official reaction, however, has been relatively “muted” considering the incident concerns Taiwan, Benjamin Ho, coordinator of the China Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, tells TIME. And despite the clamor, he says, China is unlikely to escalate the matter.

Chin-Hao Huang, author of Power and Restraint in China’s Rise and associate professor of political science at the National University of Singapore, tells TIME that one reason why China’s response has been somewhat tempered may be due to a “tacit recognition” of the illegal actions of the fishing boat.

“In terms of legality, it is clear who’s in the wrong here—who actually trespassed and operated a vessel without the proper registration,” he says. “There’s an understanding and recognition too, from the Chinese side, that you can’t really press this case further because there’s no legal grounding for them to issue a tough and harsh statement.”

Ho also cautions that fishermen casualties would not rank high in China’s priorities. “It’s probably not going to rank as heavily as if a Chinese jet would be shot down, or even a drone,” he says.

Taiwan has a history of apprehending fishermen from the mainland entering its waters. In September 2023, the Taiwanese Coast Guard detained the crew of a fishing vessel spotted 16 nautical miles off Hua Islet, Taiwan’s westernmost islet. Fishing vessels and fishermen have historically been used by Chinese authorities as a way to solidify Beijing’s claims to disputed waters, especially in the South China Sea.

While the Taiwan Strait has long been home to political tensions, fatalities resulting from the ongoing territorial rows are virtually unheard of. A pair of deadly maritime disasters involving Taiwanese authorities and mainland Chinese fishermen made headlines in 1990, when a fishing boat repatriating 50 illegal Chinese immigrants back to the mainland was hit by a Taiwanese naval vessel at sea, killing 21 on board the boat; that came just weeks after 25 Chinese immigrants died of suffocation while being repatriated to mainland China, after Taiwanese authorities forced them into boat cabins that were then sealed shut.

Already strained relations between China and Taiwan were thrown into greater uncertainty after the DPP’s William Lai Ching-te won the presidency in Taiwan’s January election. While it remains too early to tell if Beijing will up its belligerence against the island it claims as its own, the level of restraint it has shown this week may offer a glimpse into a broader strategy going forward that may prioritize diplomacy over conflict.

Read More: Taiwan’s Election Isn’t Disastrous for China—Unless Xi Makes It

“In the grand scheme of things,” says Huang, “I think maybe, in Beijing’s calculations, this shouldn’t torpedo the larger effort China may have to … encourage Taiwan to return to more functional collaboration.”

Taiwan defends coast guard after China complains about fatal accident near front-line islet

Taiwan has complained in recent years about Chinese fishing boats and other vessels operating in Taiwan-controlled waters.
PHOTO: Reuters

FEBRUARY 15, 2024 

TAIPEI - Taiwan on Feb 15 defended the actions of its coast guard after two people on a Chinese speedboat, which got too close to a front-line Taiwanese island, died when their boat overturned while trying to flee a coast guard ship.

China's Taiwan Affairs Office said Taiwan had for some time been treating Chinese fishermen in a "rough and dangerous" manner, which was the main reason for the "wicked" incident.

Taiwan, which China claims as its own territory, has complained in recent years about Chinese fishing boats and other vessels operating in Taiwan-controlled waters, especially around the Kinmen and Matsu islands that sit a short distance from China's coast.


On Feb 14, two out of four people on a Chinese speedboat that entered prohibited waters near Kinmen's Beiding islet, home to a military garrison, died when their boat overturned after it tried to flee from a Taiwanese coast guard vessel, the coast guard said.

Taiwan's Chinese-policy making Mainland Affairs Council said, according to a preliminary investigation, the coast guard performed their duties in accordance with the law and did nothing improper.

It is China that has failed to stop Chinese ships illegally dredging for sand, using explosives and poison to fish as well as dump garbage in Taiwanese waters, and the situation has not improved despite complaints, the council said.

"We deeply regret that the mainland crew members refused to co-operate with our law enforcement work this time and an unfortunate incident occurred.

"We also hope that the relevant mainland authorities can restrain similar behaviour by people on the other side" of the Taiwan Strait, it added in a statement.

Kinmen was the site of frequent fighting during the height of the Cold War and while many of the islets, which are part of the island group, are heavily fortified by Taiwan's military and off limits to civilians, today it is a popular tourist destination.

Taiwan, whose government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, says China has been using so-called grey-zone warfare, which entails using irregular tactics to exhaust a foe without actually resorting to open combat, including sending civilian ships into or close by Taiwanese waters.

 

Scottish Sea Farms situation beginning to improve, SalMar reports

Scottish Sea Farms hatcher, Barcaldine

Scottish Sea Farms could be turning the corner with its biological problems, new figures suggest today. The business has still to get back into profit, however.

SalMar, which jointly owns the business with the Leroy Seafood Company, says in its 2023 fourth quarter report that SSF (also known as Norskott Havbruk) showed an improvement from previous quarters last year and produced modest results.

The UK operation produced revenue of NOK 497m (£37.3m) against NOK 693m (£52m) for the corresponding period in 2022. Around 87% of production was sold on contract.

The revenue for the year was NOK 2.56bn (£192m) against NOK 3.18bn (almost £240m) in 2022.

But the operational loss or EBIT was lower during Q4 2023, emerging at NOK 47m (£3.5m) against a loss of NOK 127m (£9.5m) in Q4 2022.

The operational loss for the full 12 months in 2023 was NOK 304m (£22.8m) against a profit of NOK 214m (£16m) in 2022.

The harvest volume during Q4 was 4,600 tonnes and 24,900 tonnes for the whole year. The 2022 harvest was almost 36,000 tonnes.

SalMar’s share of the loss was NOK 18m (£1.35m) and NOK 482m (£36m) for the year.

Salmar said the EBIT loss per kg gutted weight was negative NOK 10.3 in the period, an increase from the loss of NOK 17.5 per kg in the corresponding period last year.

It said the results were still weak during the final quarter, due to continued biological challenges, but conditions have improved, and the company foresees an improved biological situation for the generations to be harvested during 2024.

The volume guidance for 2024 is kept unchanged at 37,000 tonnes.

Scottish Sea Farms site, Lober Rock, Orkney

Carbon intensity regulation to make or break global low-carbon hydrogen market

Exporters and developers need to consider full value chain emissions associated with hydrogen, says new WoodMac report

15 February 2024


The future of low-carbon hydrogen hinges on global policymakers introducing regulations and subsidies that focus on the carbon intensity of the hydrogen produced rather than its colour, according to Wood Mackenzie’s Horizons report ‘Over the rainbow: Why understanding full value-chain carbon intensity is trumping the colour of hydrogen.’

“The push for better measurement of efforts to cut emissions globally is shining a spotlight on the precise carbon intensity of different sources of hydrogen supply. Because of its potential to deliver almost carbon-free hydrogen, green hydrogen is generating the most industry interest, but it is important exporters and developers look more closely at the full value chain as more regulation is put in place,” Flor De La Cruz, Principal Analyst, author of the report, said.

Carbon intensity of blue and green hydrogen


For green (electrolytic) hydrogen, nearly all emissions are attributable to the electricity used by the electrolyser. In principle, it should only be called ‘green’ if it uses 100% renewable power. However, the variability of renewables means that multiple electrolytic hydrogen projects are planning grid connection to maximise the utilisation of electrolysers and lower hydrogen unit costs. However, if the availability of renewable power is limited, there is a high risk that green hydrogen projects will need to connect to grids with very high carbon intensity, stated the report.

According to Wood Mackenzie’s hydrogen value chain emissions model, emissions from green hydrogen produced from 100% grid power could be as high as 50 kilograms of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of hydrogen (kgCO2e/kgH2) – worse than brown hydrogen* – if the electrolyser is connected to a grid powered by fossil fuels. Currently, at least 30% of the 565-gigawatt electrolysis (Gwe) of announced or operational green hydrogen projects are expected to be grid connected, as shown in Wood Mackenzie’s Lens Hydrogen project tracker.

In the case of blue hydrogen, emissions can come from upstream natural gas production, transportation, reforming, and energy use. In principle, almost all these emissions can be captured and stored. However, capturing more than 60% of the carbon dioxide from hydrogen production is costly and has yet to be proven at scale.

Blue and green emissions, 2023:



Source: Wood Mackenzie Lens Hydrogen and Ammonia Service (please see assumptions in Notes to Editors).

A spotlight on life-cycle emissions

Hydrogen's carbon intensity isn’t just limited to its production, stated the report. With more than 40% of announced project capacity targeting exports, it is important to understand its full life-cycle emissions, including processing ammonia and transportation.

“If transport is required, production emissions for hydrogen only tell part of the story, as unaccounted, often substantial, emissions occur through the rest of the value chain. For example, any future trade in hydrogen between Australia and Northeast Asia or the Middle East and Europe requires hydrogen to be shipped across significant distances,” De La Cruz said.

Many countries have already established carbon-intensity thresholds for low-carbon hydrogen. But most, including future importers such as Japan and South Korea, only count production or well-to-gate emissions. For future developers and buyers of blue and green hydrogen, it is critical to consider emissions abatement strategies across each step of the value chain.

Most developers of hydrogen export projects aim to use ammonia as the carrier. While it is the most promising carrier from a cost and a technology readiness perspective, ammonia’s total value chain emissions, including synthesis, transportation, and cracking, are significant, and could add 1-4.5 kgCO2e/kgH2 to the carbon intensity of the final product.



Complying with regulatory requirements

Emissions from transport and processing can make a critical difference to whether hydrogen sources can meet regulatory requirements, stated the report. Green hydrogen with 20% grid supply and blue hydrogen with 60% capture do not make the cut in the EU or Japan. But even US blue hydrogen, with 95% capture converted to ammonia and shipped to the EU, would be at the very limit of the European carbon intensity threshold. Cracking the ammonia back into hydrogen in the Netherlands, for example, would tip hydrogen over the edge.

Green hydrogen made using 100% renewable power and converted into green ammonia would have an emissions intensity below the EU threshold, even if shipped from Australia. But if imported hydrogen is produced using even a small amount of grid power, it could struggle to stay below EU and Japanese threshold limits. Exporters will need to focus on technologies for reducing the emissions from ammonia, transportation, and processing, so they can comply with varying regulation.

De La Cruz added: “Subsidies will be vital to support low-carbon hydrogen supply and demand for years to come and will make or break project economics. With carbon intensity thresholds and associated rules forming the basis of incentive frameworks in most markets, a key issue for the industry now is how far these rules will incorporate full-cycle emissions.”

Only the EU defines carbon intensity as including emissions across the full life cycle through its Delegated Acts. In the US, guidance issued by the Treasury in December 2023 sets increasingly demanding requirements for projects to be eligible for the maximum US$3/kgH2 production tax credit available under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, under the current well-to-gate scope, US green hydrogen project developers need to source renewable electricity only for their production, not for any conversion to ammonia or another derivative.

In Asia, Japan and South Korea have signalled they will gradually expand the emissions scope to ‘landed’ to include ammonia conversion and transportation emissions, though neither has yet implemented this.

ENDS

The global hydrogen market today is around 90 Mtpa) almost all of it carbon-intensive grey or brown hydrogen. Looking ahead project production is forecasted to triple to 270 Mtpa by 2050, with low-carbon green and blue hydrogen accounting for 200 Mtpa of this, according to Wood Mackenzie’s base case as outlined in the Energy Transition Outlook.

*Brown hydrogen definition


Brown hydrogen is made from coal or lignite via the gasification process.

Graph 1: Blue and green emissions, 2023. Assumptions:


Blue hydrogen: Assuming a retrofitted SMR unit with 60% capture. Reforming emissions will vary by technology (SMR vs ATR) and whether the asset is retrofit or newbuild. For upstream, we assume the average emissions for all gas-producing assets in each country, including methane fugitive emissions. Upstream emissions and methane fugitive emissions vary by asset. Electricity for reforming and CCS is sourced from the grid, assuming an average grid intensity in each country. The grid intensity will vary by region in larger markets such as Australia and the US and will decrease over time.

Green hydrogen: assuming an average grid intensity in each market. Electricity consumption assumed is 55kWh/kgH2 for the electrolyser system. The electricity consumption will vary by electrolyser technology and can range from 40 kWh/kgH2 to 60 kWh/kgH2 for an electrolyser system. Electrolyser efficiency is expected to improve over time.