Sunday, October 27, 2024


AURORA, COLORADO THE REAL STORY

They came to America looking for better lives — and better schools. The results were mixed



Alisson Ramírez, right, listens to her social studies teacher during class Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2024, in Aurora, Colo. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)ASSOCIATED PRESS

Dylan Martínez-Ramírez sharpens his pencil before heading to school Thursday, Aug. 29, 2024, in Aurora, Colo. (AP Photo/Godofredo A. Vásquez)ASSOCIATED PRESS


BIANCA VÁZQUEZ TONESS
Sat, October 26, 2024

AURORA, Colo. (AP) — Starting seventh grade at her first American school, facing classes taught entirely in English, Alisson Ramirez steeled herself for rejection and months of feeling lost.

“I was nervous that people would ask me things and I wouldn’t know how to answer,” the Venezuelan teen says. “And I would be ashamed to answer in Spanish.”

But it wasn’t quite what she expected. On her first day in Aurora Public Schools in Colorado this past August, many of her teachers translated their classes’ relevant vocabulary into Spanish and handed out written instructions in Spanish. Some teachers even asked questions such as “terminado?” or “preguntas?” — Are you done? Do you have questions? One promised to study more Spanish to better support Alisson.


“That made me feel better,” says Alisson, 13.

Outside the classrooms, it’s a different story. While that school system is striving to accommodate more than 3,000 new students mostly from Venezuela and Colombia, the city government has taken the opposite approach. City Council has tried to dissuade Venezuelan immigrants from moving to Aurora by vowing not to spend any money helping newcomers. Officials plan to investigate the nonprofits who helped migrants settle in the Denver suburb.

When Aurora’s mayor spread unfounded claims of Venezuelan gangs taking over an apartment complex there, former president and current GOP candidate Donald Trump magnified the claims at his campaign rallies, calling Aurora a “war zone.” Immigrants are “poisoning” schools in Aurora and elsewhere with disease, he has said. “They don’t even speak English.”

Trump has promised that Aurora, population 400,000, will be one of the first places he launches his program to deport migrants if he’s elected.



This is life as a newcomer to the United States in 2024, home of the “American dream” and conflicting ideas about who can achieve it. Migrants arriving in this polarized country find themselves bewildered by its divisions.

Many came looking for better lives for their families. Now, they question whether this is even a good place to raise their children.

Rumors make life harder for immigrants in Aurora

Of course, it’s not always clear to Alisson’s family that they live in a discrete city called Aurora, with its own government and policies that differ from those of neighboring Denver and other suburbs. One thing has seemed obvious to her mother, Maria Angel Torres, 43, as she moves around Aurora and Denver looking for work or running errands: While some organizations and churches are eager to help, some people are deeply afraid of her and her family,



The fear first became apparent on a routine trip to the grocery store back in the spring. Torres was standing in line holding a jug of milk and other items when she moved a little too close to the young woman in front of her. The woman — a teen who spoke Spanish with an American accent — told Torres to keep her distance.

“It was humiliating,” says Torres. “I don’t look like a threat. But people here act like they feel terrorized.”

And when Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman — and then Trump — started talking about Venezuelan gangs taking over an apartment and the entire city of Aurora, Torres didn’t understand. While she didn’t believe that gangs had “taken over,” she worried that any bad press about Venezuelans would affect her and her family.

Keeping out dangerous people is important to Torres. The whole reason her family left Venezuela was to escape lawlessness and violence. They didn’t want it to follow them here.



In addition to Alisson, Torres has an older daughter — Gabriela Ramirez, 27. Ramirez’s partner, Ronexi Bocaranda, 37, owned a food truck selling hot dogs and hamburgers. Bocaranda says government workers in Venezuela extorted a bribe from him known as a “vacuna,” or vaccine, because paying it ensures protection from harassment. He paid them the equivalent of $500, about half a week’s earnings, to continue operating.

The next week, when Bocaranda refused to pay, the government workers stabbed him in the bicep; the one-inch scar remains visible on his left arm. The men threatened to kill Ramirez and her young son, who were both at the food truck that day. Bocaranda sold the business, and the family, including Torres and Alisson, all fled to Colombia.

A little over two years later, the family headed north on foot through the Darién Gap. In Mexico, they crossed the border in Juarez and turned themselves in to U.S. Border Patrol. They all have deportation hearings in 2025, where they will have the opportunity to plead their case for asylum based on the threats against Bocaranda, Ramirez and her son. In the meantime, they have settled in Aurora, after hearing about the Denver area from a family who helped them on their journey to the U.S.

Torres and her daughter tried to get their kids into school soon after they arrived in Aurora in February, but they were confused by the vaccination requirements. Could the kids enter school with the vaccinations they received in Venezuela and Colombia, or would they have to get all new shots? Would they have to pay for each one, potentially costing hundreds of dollars per child?



Alisson and Dylan stayed home for months. Dylan played math or first-person shooter games. Alisson watched crafting videos on TikTok. When they finally entered school in the fall, Gabriela Ramirez and Torres both hoped instruction would be in English, believing their children would learn the language faster that way.

Times have changed in Aurora

If they’d arrived in Aurora, say, three years ago, that might have been what they encountered.

Aurora is accustomed to educating immigrants’ children. More than a third of residents speak a language other than English at home, according to the 2020 U.S. Census. Immigrants and refugees have been attracted to Aurora’s proximity to Denver and its relatively lower cost of living.



But the sudden arrival of so many students from Venezuela and Colombia who didn’t speak English caught some Aurora schools off guard. Before, a teacher in the 38,000-student school system might have had one or two newcomer students in her class. Now, teachers in some schools have as many as 10, or a third of their classroom roster.

When Marcella Garcia visited classrooms where only English was spoken, she noticed the newcomers weren’t talking. “Kids were being left out and not able to engage,” says Garcia, principal at Aurora Hills Middle School.

The schools reached out for advice and training from the district’s central office, which recommended a strategy called “translanguaging.” That means using Spanish at times to help students make meaning of the English lessons and conversations happening around them.

It’s not clear how much it’s helping students learn — it’s too soon to tell — or if the school is striking the right balance between translating for newcomers and forcing them to engage in what teachers call a “friendly struggle” to understand and learn English.



But the approach has helped Alisson feel more at ease. On her first day of school, her social studies teacher, a bald man with tattooed forearms and a gruff teaching persona, didn’t translate anything or use Spanish in his presentation. “I thought about sitting there and not saying anything,” Alisson remembers. “But then I thought, 'I’m here to learn.’”

She and a friend approached the teacher during class. Now Jake Emerson is one of her favorite teachers.

On a Wednesday in September, Alisson and her friends were sitting at a round table in the back of Emerson’s class. They spoke Spanish among themselves as Emerson spoke to the rest of the class about the drawing he was projecting on the large screen in the front of the class.

It was a scene from an ancient Egyptian marketplace. “What do you think this dude here is doing with the basket?” Emerson asked the class. The students at Alisson’s table kept talking, even as Emerson spoke. One girl who’d been in Aurora schools longer than the rest translated for Alisson and the other teens.



Before the school adopted this new approach, teachers may have shut down a conversation among students in Spanish. “If I saw two students speaking Spanish, I assumed they were off topic,” says Assistant Principal John Buch. Now, he says students are encouraged to help each other in any language they can.

So far, there appears to be little public pushback in the district against this approach. It generally requires more work for teachers, who have to translate materials or their own speech in real time.

While teachers try out new Spanish vocabulary, English-speaking students show a range of responses. Some seem bored or annoyed by their teachers’ sudden interest in speaking Spanish in class. Bilingual students appear proud when they can help teachers trying to use more Spanish in class.

Still, some English-speaking and bilingual students have harassed Alisson. A few weeks after school started, a group of boys tried to stop her from sitting in her seat in class. They called her ugly and told her to go back to her country. When Alisson reported this to a teacher, nothing changed. “They say they don’t tolerate bullying,” she says. “But this is bullying.” Weeks later, the boys eventually stopped.



It's a delicate situation for both teachers and students

After spending most of the day in mainstream classes, Alisson and her newcomer peers let loose in a class called Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Education. It’s the only class explicitly designed to help new immigrants speak English.

The teacher, Melissa Wesdyk, does not speak fluent Spanish. She recently started using Google Translate at times, as a simultaneous interpreter. She speaks her instructions into her laptop, and a slightly robotic voice says the instructions in Spanish.

The same is not available in Amharic or Farsi, languages spoken by two of the more than two dozen students in the class. For those two, she translates the instructions in writing and projects the words on a screen in the front of the room.

Wesdyk rarely smiles and remains serious as she runs the class. Perhaps that’s because the students are far more unruly than in Alisson’s others. Wesdyk acknowledges the relative chaos, but says it’s because the Spanish-speaking students are more comfortable in a class that’s almost exclusively Latin American immigrants.

One boy keeps standing on his chair during the lesson, and Wesdyk stops class at least four times to redirect him. “Por qué hablas?” she asks him. Why are you talking? Another time she says, “I need you to stop.”

The course also demands more of the students, whom Wesdyk presses into pronouncing words in unison and answering questions. It’s hard work, and her methods don’t always hit their mark.

Toward the end of the class, Wesdyk tells the class they are going to do a “whipshare.” Google doesn’t know how to translate that, so it just repeats the word in English. Each student is to share one of the words they wrote earlier, when the class was identifying English words for each letter of the alphabet.

When Alisson offers the word “pink” for the letter P, Wesdyk appears surprised and a little flustered. “That’s not one of the words I wrote down, but good word.”

For the letter F, another boy says “flor,” as in Spanish for flower. To observers, he seems to be trying to say “flower,” but mispronouncing it. Wesdyk doesn’t appear to understand. “Floor?” she says back to him. The boy repeats “flor,” and Wesdyk says, “Floor?” emphasizing the English R sound. The boy looks embarrassed.

In mid-September, Alisson’s mother receives messages from Aurora Public Schools that there have been rumors of bomb threats at its schools and others across the state. It’s not clear if the threats are related to Trump’s rhetoric about Venezuelan gangs taking over Aurora. After all, similar problems ensued after his false comments about pet-eating Haitians in Springfield, Ohio.

The school system’s messages say there is no truth to the bomb threat rumors, but that doesn’t make Torres and Alisson feel better. Torres still sends Allison to school, despite her fear. She’s learned she can get in trouble if Alisson misses class without a good excuse, and Alisson is generally happy at school.

But neither of them understands how American schools and children could become a target, even if it’s just a rumor.

“This doesn’t happen in my country,” says Torres.

Venezuela’s economy and democracy may be in shambles, says Torres, but no one there would think of threatening children at school.

___

The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Saturday, October 26, 2024

 THE GREATEST CANADIAN; TOMMY DOUGLAS,

 CCF/NDP LEADER   ON FASCISM


 




‘Outrageous abuse of power’: Trump spurned disaster pleas amid feud with governor

Thomas Frank and Scott Waldman
Fri, October 25, 2024


In early September 2020, wildfires tore through eastern Washington state, obliterating tens of millions of dollars of property, displacing hundreds of rural residents and killing a 1-year-old boy.

But then-President Donald Trump refused to act on Gov. Jay Inslee’s request for $37 million in federal disaster aid because of a bitter personal dispute with the Democratic governor, an investigation by POLITICO’s E&E News shows.

Trump sat on Inslee’s request for the final four months of his presidency, delaying recovery and leaving communities unsure about rebuilding because nobody knew if they would get federal help.



Trump ignored Inslee’s 73-page request even after the Federal Emergency Management Agency found during weeks of inspection that the wildfires easily met the federal damage threshold for disaster aid.

“It really was an outrageous abuse of power,” Inslee said in a recent interview with E&E News.

Trump’s campaign did not respond to E&E News’ questions.

The two men had been feuding in the months leading up to the wildfire with Trump calling Inslee "a snake," a “nasty person” and a "failed presidential candidate" after the governor criticized the administration’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. And Inslee, in an open letter two days before seeking disaster aid, assailed Trump’s “reckless statements” on climate change and his “gutting of environmental policies.”



Trump’s spurning of Washington — documented by internal emails, letters, federal records and interviews — is the latest example of how the former president used disaster requests to punish political foes. E&E News reported in early October that Trump had refused to give disaster aid to California after wildfires in 2018 because the state is strongly Democratic.

E&E News’ current investigation found other previously unreported examples of Trump denying or delaying disaster aid to governors who had criticized him, though the reasons for the White House moves are unclear.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a Republican representing the wildfire-damaged area in Washington state, asked Trump at least twice to approve disaster aid and wrote him a desperate letter on Dec. 31, 2020, obtained by E&E News.

“People in my district need support, and I implore you to move forward in providing it to those who have been impacted by devastating wildfires,” McMorris Rodgers wrote. Her district was one of three in Washington state to support Trump in the 2020 election. Washington has 10 congressional districts.



Five months after Trump left office, McMorris Rodgers introduced a bill to require presidents to act on governors’ requests for disaster aid within 30 days. She did not respond to a request for comment.

President Joe Biden ultimately approved Inslee’s request two weeks after taking office — 141 days after Inslee had made it — and has given Washington $45 million.

The time span — nearly five months — is the longest it’s taken a president to approve a disaster request, according to an E&E News analysis of more than 1,000 FEMA damage reports since 2007 when they first became publicly available.

The average time period for presidential approval is 17 days.



Trump has faced scrutiny of his record with disasters as he has criticized the Biden administration during recent campaign stops in Georgia and North Carolina for its response to Hurricanes Helene and Milton.

But Trump recently endorsed using disaster aid to bully opponents. During an Oct. 12 rally in rural California, Trump celebrated a proposal to increase agricultural water supplies by weakening endangered-species protections and threatened Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom.

“We’ll force it down his throat,” Trump said, “and we’ll say, 'Gavin, if you don’t do it, we’re not giving you any of that fire money that we send you all the time for all the forest fires that you have.'”

Newsom recently told POLITICO that Trump withheld disaster aid to California “on multiple occasions” over political differences and stepped up the threats during his final months in office.



“He was very threatening,” Newsom said. “He was telling me right before the [2020] election … ‘You better work with me now, because I'm going to get reelected, and you’re going down on this.’”
'Everything was gone'

The wildfires in Washington burned 640,000 acres — an area more than three times the size of New York City. Fueled by high winds, low humidity and drought conditions, the fires burned with such intensity that local resident Larry Frick heard ammunition popping from homes across the town of Malden, population 216.

“It looked like a landscape of hell or a war zone,” Frick said. “Everything was gone.”

Fire destroyed 80 percent of the homes in Malden as well as town hall, the post office, library, food bank, fire station and most trees.




Malden is largely rebuilt, but what Frick remembers is “the childishness” of Trump’s refusal to act on Inslee’s request.

“We’re supposed to be taking care of one another, and that didn’t happen at a federal level,” Frick said.

Malden Mayor Dan Harwood said that Trump’s inaction “slowed down the start” of recovery and “made things stressful” because federal aid was uncertain.

“The unknown didn’t help anybody,” Harwood told E&E News.

As wildfire survivors waited, Inslee and other Washington elected officials urged Trump through public letters and private emails.

Casey Katims, Inslee’s director of federal affairs, was in regular contact with the White House, promoting the disaster request and trying to understand the holdup.



In a Nov. 8, 2020, email obtained by E&E News through a public-records request, Katims pleaded with Nicholas Pottebaum, the White House deputy director of intergovernmental affairs.

“Our emergency management teams at the state and local levels are struggling and unable to proceed with response and recovery efforts until we get a decision,” Katims wrote.

“Nic would take my phone calls but was not forthcoming about the reason for the delay,” Katims said in a recent interview.

Pottebaum, now a Republican staffer on the Senate Budget Committee, declined to comment.

The inaction troubled all 12 members of Washington’s congressional delegation.



“There was a feeling of exasperation and frustration that little could be done to persuade the president to grant a declaration for assistance that was so needed and warranted,” Katims said. Katims is now executive director of the U.S. Climate Alliance, a coalition of governors.

Four days before Trump left office, an unnamed aide to McMorris Rodgers told the Spokesman Review in Spokane that the “holdup now is the relationship between the president and Gov. Inslee.”

Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said she had called “numerous Trump administration officials” about the disaster aid and her staff engaged with the administration “countless times.”

“Never in my lifetime have I seen a President withhold disaster aid over politics — until Trump came into office,” Murray said in a recent statement to E&E News. “Donald Trump’s treatment of the town of Malden was a complete disgrace.”



Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) said in a statement, “Trump let a request for desperately needed federal aid go unanswered while hundreds of residents were left in the dark not knowing whether they had resources to rebuild.”

Inslee said he doesn’t recall what triggered Trump’s inaction and that he never spoke to Trump about the disaster request.

“There was no rationale at all given for this by anybody at any time,” Inslee said. “It was a hugely traumatic experience, and this just added to the trauma.”
Delays in three other states

Trump learned the political value of disasters after Hurricane Harvey overwhelmed southeastern Texas in 2017 and Time magazine wrote a flattering accountof the administration’s response, said Mark Harvey, who was Trump’s senior director for resilience policy on the National Security Council staff.

“It really got stuck in his mind at that point-of-disaster response, that showing up and doing this disaster theater is a way for him to garner support and a way for him to be admired — and that feeds into his personality,” said Harvey, who is supporting Vice President Kamala Harris for president.

Harvey said that as Trump’s presidency continued, he more frequently delayed disaster aid based on factors that had nothing to do with helping with cleanup and rebuilding.

“It was, 'What looks good for me,' not, 'What's the right thing to do,'” Harvey said.

E&E News found instances that fit the pattern described by Harvey in which Trump, after he lost the 2020 election, delayed or ignored requests for disaster aid from governors who had criticized him. E&E News could not determine reasons for the delays and inaction, which can result from extensive White House review.

In a 2022 book by the journalists Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont, a Democrat, and then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Maryland Republican, recalled that Trump told them to “ask nicely” for additional disaster aid, which he then granted. (Martin and Burns wrote the book while employed at The New York Times but now work at POLITICO, where Martin is the politics bureau chief and Burns is the head of news.)

Pete Gaynor, whom Trump put in charge of FEMA in 2020, said in an interview that he did not recall details of individual requests for disaster aid.

“I will emphatically say I never had a conversation with the president, the vice president, OMB or anyone else in that orbit that said, 'Drag your feet,'” Gaynor said referring to the White House Office of Management and Budget. Gaynor left FEMA at the end of Trump’s presidency and is a senior adviser at McChrystal Group business consultants.

Under federal law, FEMA calculates damage from an event, determines whether it exceeds a threshold for disaster aid and makes a recommendation to the president, who makes the final decision.
Georgia

On Nov. 21, 2020, three days after asking Trump for disaster aid to recover from a tropical storm, Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia enraged Trump by certifying election results declaring Biden the winner of the state’s 16 electoral votes.

Trump, who had been urging Kemp and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to declare him the winner in Georgia, assailed the governor as a “moron” and a “nut job” after his certification. Trump sat on the disaster request for 55 days before approving it with eight days left in his term.

Kemp, who has endorsed Trump and appeared at campaign rallies with him, declined to comment.
Utah

Trump took 97 days to approve a disaster request by then-Utah Gov. Gary Herbert, a Republican, following damaging storms in October 2020 despite a FEMA report showing the state sustained twice as much damage as needed to meet the threshold for providing disaster aid.

While Trump was considering the request, Herbert was one of the first Republican officials to recognize Biden as the election winner and denounced a decision by Utah’s attorney general to join a lawsuit challenging the 2020 election results in four states that Trump lost.

Herbert, who left office in January 2021, did not respond to a phone message.
Maryland

Trump took no action on a Nov. 12, 2020, request for aid by Hogan after a tropical storm caused damage that FEMA said was sufficient to qualify for federal aid.

Hogan, a moderate Republican in a heavily Democratic state, assailed Trump’s handling of Covid-19 and made a well-publicized trip to South Korea to buy 500,000 test kits.

Ten days after Hogan’s request, Trump mocked Hogan on Twitter, calling him “just as bad as the flawed tests he paid big money for!”

Hogan, who is running for U.S. Senate this year, did not respond to E&E News questions.

After Biden approved the request on Feb. 4, 2021, Maryland Emergency Management Agency Director Russell Strickland told a congressional hearing that the “delay caused us to miss opportunities” to strengthen the state against future disasters.

"Citizens do not have the ability to wait months to receive assistance and return to their homes and businesses," Strickland testified.

US Army entirely redacts statement on Trump campaign Arlington incident

The Army said it now “considers this matter closed.”


Brett Samuels
Fri, October 25, 2024


The U.S. Army on Friday released a heavily redacted report on an incident at Arlington National Cemetery involving a staffer and aides with the Trump campaign when the former president visited the cemetery in August.

The nonpartisan watchdog group American Oversight obtained a copy of the report, which offers very few details about the incident. It lists the offense in question as a “simple assault, and offers a partially redacted description of what allegedly took place.

“While working at the Arlington National Cemetery, [REDACTED] with both of [REDACTED] hands while attempting to move past [REDACTED] did not require medical attention on scene and later refused when offered. [REDACTED] rendered a sworn statement on a DA Form 2023 and stated [REDACTED] did not want to press charges,” the report reads.

But the entire statement about what took place from the cemetery employee is redacted.



Trump visited Arlington National Cemetery on Aug. 26 for a ceremony to mark the anniversary of the Kabul airport attack that killed 13 U.S. service members amid the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

NPR, citing an anonymous source, first reported a cemetery official tried to stop Trump staffers from filming and photographing in an area of the cemetery where soldiers recently killed in Afghanistan and Iraq are buried, known as Section 60. The source told NPR that Trump staffers pushed the official aside when they tried to stop campaign officials from entering the area.

The Trump campaign blamed the cemetery employee for the incident and accused them of having a “mental health episode” and trying to “physically block members of President Trump’s team during a very solemn ceremony.”

The Army itself weighed in to defend the employee’s actions, saying they were trying to enforce rules prohibiting political activities on cemetery grounds when they were pushed aside.

“Consistent with the decorum expected at [the cemetery], this employee acted with professionalism and avoided further disruption,” the official said, adding the incident was reported to police but “the employee subsequently decided not to press charges.”

The Army said it now “considers this matter closed.”
SPACE/COSMOS

'Yikes': While gaming, Musk inadvertently broadcasts 'scary' near-abort of Starship booster landing

TechCrunch · Image Credits:SpaceX

Aria Alamalhodaei
Fri, October 25, 2024 

Elon Musk occasionally posts clips of his video game plays to his social media platform X — but a recent clip includes background audio of a SpaceX engineer telling Musk how the most recent Starship flight test was “one second away” from an abort. The clip, posted on Friday, was caught by Reuters' Joey Roulette on X, but it's not clear if the conversation between Musk and Starship engineers occurred that same day.

“I want to be really upfront about scary shit that happened,” the unnamed engineer said, seemingly as Musk played Diablo IV. He went on to explain that a misconfigured component didn’t have the right “ramp up time for bringing up spin pressure” on the booster.

“We were one second away from that tripping and telling the rocket to abort and try to crash into the ground next to the tower,” the engineer says.

“Wow,” Musk says in response. “Yikes.”

The same engineer went on to say that right before engine startup on the booster’s descent back to Earth, a cover on the skin of the booster ripped off, apparently in a place that had been spot welded. “We wouldn't have predicted the exact right place, but this cover that ripped off was right on top of a bunch of the single point failure valves that must work during the landing burn. So thankfully, none of those or the harnessing got damaged, but we ripped this chine cover off over some really critical equipment right as landing burn was starting. We have a plan to address that.”

Musk was being briefed on the fifth Starship integrated test flight, referred to as IFT-5, which took place on October 13. SpaceX set its most ambitious mission objectives yet for that test, including returning the Super Heavy booster to the launch site and catching it with a pair of oversized “chopstick” arms that jut out from the launch tower.

The company pulled it off, and made history as a result. The full context of the conversation is not clear, as the clip posted to X is only about three minutes long, but it shows that even seemingly flawless rocket launches (and in this case, booster landings) can come perilously close to disaster. And that after each test, SpaceX is furnished with a "butt load," as the engineer put it, of post-flight data to inform future testing.

“We’re trying to do a reasonable balance of speed and risk mitigation on the booster” prior to the next flight attempt, the engineer said. The engineers note that this will be the first Starship test flight whose schedule is not set by the FAA. While SpaceX has typically outpaced the regulator in terms of launch readiness, versus the FAA’s launch license approval schedule, the FAA actually gave approval for IFT-5 and IFT-6 at the same time.
US nuclear regulator kicks off review on Three Mile Island restart


Updated Fri, October 25, 2024
By Laila Kearney

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. nuclear regulators kicked off a long-winding process to consider Constellation Energy's unprecedented plans to restart its retired Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in an initial public meeting held on Friday.

Constellation, which announced last month that it had signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Microsoft that would enable reopening the Unit 1 reactor at Three Mile Island, made its case before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to restore its operating license for the plant.

The company also sought to extend the life of the plant and change its name to the Crane Clean Energy Center.

Three Mile Island, which is located in Pennsylvania on an island in the Susquehanna River, is widely known for the 1979 partial meltdown of its Unit 2 reactor. That unit has been permanently shut and is being decommissioned.

Members of the NRC requested details about the emergency evacuation plans for the restarted plant and information about the commercial deal with Microsoft, while imploring Constellation to quickly work on permitting related to its water use for the plant.

The NRC also raised questions about how the restart of Unit 1 would intersect with the decommissioning of Unit 2, which began last year, nearly 45 years after the partial meltdown.

Utah-based nuclear services company EnergySolutions owns Unit 2 and related infrastructure, while Constellation owns Unit 1 and the site's land.

Unit 1 shut down due to economic reasons in 2019, some 15 years before the operating license was set to expire. At the time, Constellation said it did not anticipate a restart.


Constellation now expects to restart the 835-megawatt Unit 1 in 2028, delivering power to the grid to offset electricity use by Microsoft's data center in the region.

A recent jump in U.S. electricity demand, driven in part by Big Tech's energy-intensive AI data center expansion has led to a revival of the country's struggling nuclear industry.

No retired reactor has been restarted before. The Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan, owned by Holtec, is also in the process of being resurrected.

Earlier this year, Constellation completed initial testing on the reactor and determined it was physically, and financially, possible to resurrect it.

"We understand how we shut it down and we have a good idea of how we are going to restart this," plant manager Trevor Orth said at the NRC meeting.

The physical work to restore Three Mile Island, which is expected to start in the first quarter of 2025, cost at least $1.6 billion, and could require thousands of workers, still needs licensing modifications and permitting.

Local activists have also vowed to fight the project over safety and environmental concerns, including the storage of nuclear waste on the site.

Scott Portzline, who is with nuclear watchdog group Three Mile Island Alert in Harrisburg, questioned the site's backup power and criticized the proposed nuclear control room simulator used for training.

"I have a constitutional right to know how my nuclear plants are operating and the utility ought to be able to answer that," Portzline said during the meeting.

Local businesses and the building trades made comments in support of plant's comeback in the meeting.

Under the National Environmental Policy Act, the NRC will be required to complete an environmental assessment within the final year of any restart. The plant will require other environmental permits, including ones for air emissions and water pollutants.

(Reporting by Laila Kearney; Editing by Marguerita Choy)
Reuters exposé of hack-for-hire world is back online after Indian court ruling

Reuters
Updated Sat, October 26, 2024 

A metro train moves past next to commercial buildings in Netaji Subhash Place area of New Delhi

(Reuters) - Reuters News has restored to its website an investigation into mercenary hacking after a New Delhi court lifted a takedown order it issued last year.

The article, originally published on Nov. 16, 2023, and titled “How an Indian startup hacked the world,” detailed the origins and operations of a New Delhi-based cybersecurity firm called Appin. Reuters found that Appin grew from an educational startup to a hack-for-hire powerhouse that stole secrets from executives, politicians and wealthy elites around the globe.

Prior to publication, a group calling itself the Association of Appin Training Centers filed suit in a New Delhi district court to prevent the report from running. In court filings, the association claimed it was the successor to Appin’s network of educational franchises in India. It accused Reuters of damaging the reputations of these schools and their students, claims the news agency denies.

Asked for comment Friday morning India time, a lawyer for the plaintiff said they weren’t being given enough time to respond, but noted that there were multiple proceedings pending between their client and Reuters. By Saturday evening India time, the attorney hadn’t replied.

The district court granted the association an initial injunction, then ordered Reuters to take down the article on Dec. 4, 2023. Reuters removed the published report from its website while it appealed that takedown order.

On Oct. 3, 2024, the same court vacated the injunction, noting that “as yet, the plaintiff has not been able to show any prima facie case to make interference in the process of journalism.”

The lawsuit remains pending.

Union's rejection of Boeing offer threatens jobs at aerospace suppliers




By Allison Lampert

(Reuters) - Striking workers' rejection of planemaker Boeing's latest contract offer has created a fresh threat to operations at aerospace suppliers such as family-run Independent Forge.

If the strike by more than 33,000 U.S. Boeing workers persists another month, the Orange County, California supplier might need to cut its operations from five to three days a week to save money and retain workers, president Andrew Flores said.


While Independent laid off a few employees already, letting more go is not an appealing option, he said. The 22 workers who remain are critical for the company, especially when the strike eventually ends and demand for its aluminum aircraft parts rebounds.

"They are the backbone of our shop," Flores said this week. "Their knowledge, I can't replace that."

Wednesday's vote by 64% of Boeing's West Coast factory workers against the company's latest contract offer, further idling assembly for nearly all of the planemaker's commercial jets, has created a fresh test for suppliers such as Independent, which opened in 1975.

Boeing's vast global network of suppliers that produce parts from sprawling modern factories or tiny garage workshops, was already stressed by the company's quality-and-safety crisis, which began in January after a mid-air panel blow-out on a new 737 MAX.

Demand for parts has dropped, hitting suppliers after they spent heavily to meet renewed demand for planes in the post-pandemic era.


How small suppliers such as Independent navigate the strike, which began on Sept. 13, is expected to affect Boeing's future ability to bring its plane production back online.

MORE JOB CUTS?

Five Boeing suppliers interviewed by Reuters this week said continuation of the strike would cause them to furlough workers, freeze investment, or consider halting production.

Boeing declined comment.

Seattle-area supplier Pathfinder, which runs a project to attract young recruits to aerospace and trains them alongside its skilled workers, will likely need to lay off more employees, CEO Dave Trader said.

Pathfinder, which let go one-quarter of its 54 workers last month, will also need to send more of its aerospace students back to their high schools, instead of training them in the company's factories, Trader said.

Suppliers on a regular call on Thursday with Boeing supply-chain executives said they expect the strike will continue for weeks, one participant told Reuters.

About 60% of the 2.21 million Americans who work in the aerospace industry have jobs directly linked to the supply chain, according to the U.S. industry group Aerospace Industries Association.

Those suppliers' decisions to reduce staffing could create a vicious cycle, as they will put added strain on Boeing's efforts to restore and eventually increase 737 MAX output above a regulator-imposed cap of 38 after its factories re-open, analysts say.

"Once we get back, we have the task of restarting the factories and the supply chain, and it's much harder to turn this on than it is to turn it off," CEO Kelly Ortberg told an analyst call on Wednesday.

"The longer it goes on, the more it could trickle back into the supply chain and cause delays there," Southwest Airlines Chief Operating Officer Andrew Watterson said of the strike on Thursday.

Shares of Boeing suppliers fell on Thursday. Howmet lost 2%. Honeywell and Spirit AeroSystems fell 5% and 3%, respectively, following weak results.

Spirit Aero, Boeing's key supplier, which has already announced the furlough of 700 workers on the 767 and 777 widebody programs for 21 days, has warned it would implement layoffs should the strike continue past November.

"It’s starting up the supply chain that is likely to be the biggest worry, especially if they have taken action to cut workers due to a lack of Boeing orders," Vertical Research Partners analyst Rob Stallard said by email.

A strained supply chain, Spirit Aero's challenges and increased regulatory oversight from the Federal Aviation Administration over MAX production, means it could take up to a year from the strike's end to get 737 output back to the 38-per-month rate, Stallard said.

(Reporting By Allison Lampert in Montreal; Additional reporting by Abhijith Ganapavaram in Bangalore and Rajesh Kumar Singh in Chicago; Editing by Rod Nickel)
Tens of thousands of demonstrators march across Italy calling for an end to war worldwide

Associated Press
Sat, October 26, 2024 

Demonstrators participate in a march for peace against all wars, in Milan, Italy, Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)ASSOCIATED PRESS

Demonstrators participate in a march for peace against all wars, in Milan, Italy, Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)ASSOCIATED PRESS

Demonstrators participate in a march for peace against all wars, in Milan, Italy, Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)ASSOCIATED PRESS

Demonstrators participate in a march for peace against all wars, in Milan, Italy, Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)ASSOCIATED PRESS

Demonstrators participate in a march for peace against all wars, in Milan, Italy, Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)ASSOCIATED PRESS


Italy Peace March
4 of 5
Demonstrators participate in a march for peace against all wars, in Milan, Italy, Saturday, Oct. 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)

ROME (AP) — Tens of thousands of demonstrators took to the streets in seven Italian cities on Saturday calling for an immediate cease-fire in the Middle East, Ukraine and all global conflicts.

Peaceful rallies were held in Rome, Turin, Milan, Florence, Bari, Palermo and Cagliari, with the support of hundreds of associations committed to peace, disarmament and human rights.

The marches came in response to escalating violence in the Middle East and growing conflicts worldwide and denounced the diminished role of the United Nations on the global scene.

In Rome, a few thousand demonstrators marched waving a giant rainbow flag in front of the Colosseum and a banner with the slogan: “Let’s stop wars. The time for peace is now!”

“The war in Ukraine has been going on for years now and what was the result? Nothing. … There are only a lot of Ukrainian and Russian people who died, many soldiers and many children,” said Daniela Ferraci, a demonstrator in the Italian capital. “The same is happening in Gaza, in Israel, in Lebanon."

Giulio Marcon, one of the organizers of the Rome rally, said “wars are never resolving problems.”

“War brings more war, weapons bring more weapons. We must choose the path of negotiation, cease-fire and diplomacy. This is the message from this square,” he said.

Maurizio Landini, leader of Italy's CGIL trade union, called for the role of international diplomacy to be reaffirmed.

“Our strongest request is a ceasefire to let governments open a real peace conference, because the new world’s balance can’t be decided by wars,” he said on stage.


Tens of thousands of demonstrators march in Italian cities calling for peace in Gaza and Ukraine

Euronews
Sat, October 26, 2024 

Tens of thousands of people marched in various Italian cities on Saturday calling for peace in Gaza and Ukraine.

Around 10,000 people marched through the centre of Rome waving a giant peace flag in front of the Colosseum.

The demonstration was organised by the Italian Disarmament Network, the CGIL labour union, several opposition centre-left parties, the war doctors charity Emergency and various minor peace advocacies.

Many among the protesters were very concerned about the high number of civilians killed in the wars both in Gaza and Ukraine.

They urged the Italian government and the international community to revive a peace conference under the leadership of the United Nations.

Other rallies were held in Turin, Milan, Florence, Bari, Palermo and Cagliari with the support of hundreds of groups calling for peace.

The marches occurred amidst escalating violence in the Middle East, as Israel launched overnight attacks against Iran on Saturday morning.

India makes it clear it's not interested in a Western alliance

CBC
Fri, October 25, 2024 

From left: Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi attend a family photo ceremony prior to the BRICS Summit plenary session in Kazan, Russia, Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2024. (Maxim Shipenkov/Associated Press - image credit)More

A meeting Wednesday between India's Narendra Modi and China's Xi Jinping in Kazan, Russia was the first in five years, and will likely be viewed with dismay in Washington, Ottawa and other Western capitals.

While it probably doesn't mark the beginning of a new Beijing-New Delhi axis, it does seem to signal that India is not about to sign on to an anti-Beijing Western alliance either, despite the best efforts of the U.S. and some other countries to persuade it to do so.

"Would the U.S. be disappointed? I imagine," said Sanjay Ruparelia, a close observer of the Modi government who teaches at Toronto Metropolitan University. "I don't think publicly they would express it, but privately."

Ruparelia said U.S. relations with India have always been complicated, and that complexity has always required the U.S. to split the relationship into silos.

"On the one hand, ties have grown despite many disagreements, and quite serious ones. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, most importantly," he said.

"But you know, we've seen in the last year a new agreement on critical emerging technologies. You've seen growing defence and security partnerships. [U.S.] President Biden was reportedly the third leader in history to have his Indian counterpart at his own private residence. And that was this year — after the FBI foiled the plot to allegedly kill Mr. (Gurpatwant Singh) Pannun."

Most recently, the U.S. signed a deal to sell India Predator drones, the primary weapons used by the U.S. in its own campaigns of extraterritorial killing targeting such groups as al-Qaeda and Islamic State.

"And I'm not surprised by that," said Ruparelia. "I mean, the U.S. is the great power and they practice realpolitik more than any other power in the world."

Ruparelia said that while he takes the RCMP's statement that they have evidence linking agents of the Indian government to homicides and other acts of violence in Canada "seriously," the U.S. government clearly has "compartmentalized the issue" in order to continue working with India.

Murder claims may take a back seat to larger issues

There are multiple factors at work in Modi's decision to seek rapprochement with China. But the tensions with the West over India's alleged program of assassinating dissidents in Canada and the U.S. could not have helped to sell him on the idea of ditching India's traditional non-alignment and jumping into an alliance with the countries that have accused him.

At the same time, the geopolitical stakes between nations as large and powerful as the U.S., India, China and Russia all but ensure that the assassination allegations will end up taking a back seat to other, bigger considerations.

Russian President Vladimir Putin,host of this year's BRICS summit, will be delighted with the meeting between Xi and Modi in Russia and may seek to take some of the credit.


Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a press conference at BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024.

Russian President Vladimir Putin holds a press conference at BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, Thursday, Oct. 24, 2024. (Maxim Shipenkov/Associated Press)

Putin was careful toseat himself between the Indian and Chinese leaders, offering a visual symbol of his role as facilitator of their coming-together, said Prof. Ho-fung Hung of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.

"This kind of photo-op meeting, in which Putin is showing up side by side with all these world leaders, is a win for Putin because it's a kind of defiance of the U.S. attempt to isolate Russia," he said. "Putin can show to people back home that actually [he has] friends, and Russia has friends, despite all these U.S. efforts. So the U.S. is failing in isolating Russia."

Burying the clubs and hatchets

A brutal medieval battle fought at dangerously high altitude in June 2020 marked the lowest point in India-China relations in many years.

Twenty Indian and four Chinese soldiers were reported killed in a melee with clubs and axes over disputed territory high in the Himalayan district of Ladakh.

Both sides respected the letter of their agreement to keep guns out of their border dispute, although the peaceful spirit of that agreement was forgotten in brutal hand-to-hand fighting.

Since then there have been more incidents, including asimilar brawl in December 2022 in Arunachal Pradesh, another mountainous stretch of the border more than 1,200 kilometres to the East.


An Indian army soldier keeps guard on top of his vehicle as their convoy moves on the Srinagar- Ladakh highway at Gagangeer, northeast of Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir, Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2020. India said Monday its soldiers thwarted “provocative” movements by China’s military near a disputed border in the Ladakh region months into the rival nations’ deadliest standoff in decades. China's military said it was taking “necessary actions in response," without giving details.More

An Indian army soldier keeps guard on top of his vehicle as their convoy moves on the Srinagar-Ladakh highway at Gagangeer, northeast of Srinagar in Indian-controlled Kashmir, on Tuesday, Sept. 1, 2020. (Mukhtar Khan/Associated Press)

The Chinese haveparaded Indian prisoners before cameras, infuriating India and provoking street demonstrations.

China's aggressive behaviour on India's borders gave the Biden administration an opening that it seized to try to persuade India to sign up to a U.S.-led Indo-Pacific alliance aimed at countering China and Chinese expansionism.

Washington pointed to the parallels between India's experience and that of the Philippines, Vietnam, and other countries subject to extreme territorial claims by China that are often pushed usinghardball methods.

For a while, it seemed to work. India signed up to a new "security dialogue" called the Quad, which united it with the U.S., Japan and Australia. But it soon became evident that India had little interest in moving past the dialogue stage.

'Mutual trust, mutual respect'

This week, India and China announced that their border disputes were on the way to being settled, opening the door for Xi and Modi to meet in person.

"We are holding a formal meeting after five years," said Modi. "We believe that the India-China relationship is very important, not only for our people but also for global peace, stability and progress. We welcome the consensus reached on the issues that have arisen over the last four years on the border.

"Mutual trust, mutual respect and mutual sensitivity should remain the basis of our relations."

Not so fast, said Ruparelia, who is writing a book on India-China relations.

"India hasn't resolved the border dispute," he said. "What they've agreed to do is to resume national patrols on either side of the dispute. In India, the media has been sort of euphoric, at least the pro-Modi media, but there haven't been any details yet.

"And the biggest outstanding question is whether the status quo ante has been restored because China crossed the line of control and then occupied a lot of territory that India claimed at its own. It's not clear whether they've retreated back to the line before the incursion in 2020."

Still, the resolution to the border dispute suggests that China is willing to be more conciliatory with India than with other neighbours, in return for India remaining true to its non-aligned traditions and refusing to join any meaningful alliance against Beijing.

"India right now is in a very good position because everybody is calling India," said Hung. "The U.S. definitely will be concerned about India getting too close with China."

But India can afford to cause heartburn in Washington, he said, and the Modi government probably knows it has little reason to fear real consequences over the alleged Pannun assassination plot.

"I think that India has the upper hand in this relation now," he said. "The U.S. really doesn't have much leverage over India about all this."


Gurpatwant Singh Pannun is a dual Canadian-American citizen who has been organizing non-binding referendums for Sikhs to vote for the creation of an independent homeland named Khalistan.

Gurpatwant Singh Pannun is a dual Canadian-American citizen who has been organizing non-binding referendums for Sikhs to vote for the creation of an independent homeland named Khalistan. (CBC)

The U.S. federal indictment against Indian drug trafficker Nikhil Gupta at the end of last year brought into public view tensions that had already been building between Washington and New Delhi for months behind the scenes.

For the first time, it became clear that the U.S. was not merely backing the Trudeau government's claim that it has evidence linking Indian agents to the killing of Canadian Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar — it also had an alleged Indian government-sponsored murder plot on its own soil.

Pannun is the leader of a worldwide effort to organize referendums in the Sikh diaspora on the future of Punjab, pushing the idea of a Sikh homeland called Khalistan carved out of present-day India.

U.S. officials say they have a clear trail of electronic footprints leading back to the New Delhi headquarters of India's intelligence service, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

U.S. officials had little choice but to act on that evidence, even if it meant upsetting the budding relationship with India.

U.S. President Joe Biden, center, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and other G20 leaders arrive to pay their tributes at the Rajghat, a Mahatma Gandhi memorial, in New Delhi, India, Sunday, Sept. 10, 2023.

U.S. President Joe Biden, center, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and other G20 leaders arrive to pay their tributes at the Rajghat, a Mahatma Gandhi memorial, in New Delhi, India on Sunday, Sept. 10, 2023. (Kenny Holston/AP)

It soon emerged that President Joe Biden had himself raised the issue with Narendra Modi at the G20 Summit in New Delhi last year. Biden's national security adviser Jake Sullivan has been tasked with managing the diplomatic aspects of a case the administration clearly wishes did not exist, but also cannot ignore.

Sullivan has met in recent months with both his Indian counterpart Ajit Doval, and with Modi himself, but has had to use some of that face-time to press India to investigate its own officials in the Pannun murder plot.

India has responded by claiming that rogue operatives were behind the conspiracy, setting up a commission of inquiry that traveled to Washington this month to report on its findings, and even placing one official under arrest.

Forced into such actions by the strength of electronic evidence in Washington's hands, Modi has simultaneously been sending signals he is not interested in ostracizing either China or Russia. Hevisited Putin in a dacha outside Moscow in early July, to theannoyance of the U.S. State Department.

Russia ties run deeper

"It's not the India-China relationship that the U.S. needs to be concerned about most, because India is also friendly with Russia," said Hung.

India's new agreement with China doesn't resolve all issues between the two countries, including India's fears about rising Chinese influence in countries that New Delhi has long considered part of its sphere of influence, such as Sri Lanka and Nepal.

India has few such structural impediments to its relationship with Moscow, said Hung.

"There's evidence showing that actually India is also helping Russia in its war effort in one way or another."


The allegations of murder plots against dissidents in Canada and the U.S. have highlighted one of the benefits of diplomacy with authoritarian regimes such as Russia and China: they don't care how you treat your dissidents and they don't give you lectures on human rights.


Russia's President Vladimir Putin and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi walk during their meeting at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence near Moscow, Russia July 8, 2024.

Russia's President Vladimir Putin and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi walk during their meeting at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence near Moscow, Russia on July 8, 2024. (Sputnik/Gavriil Grigorov/Pool via Reuters)

That understanding will likely temper U.S. pressure on India over the alleged assassination plots, in the same way that Washington has muted its criticism of India's relationship with America's rivals.

"There was the hope and expectation, I think, in some quarters in Washington that India will come on side more in the sense of therefore being more antagonistic towards China and Russia," said Ruparelia.

"But India relies on Russia for more than two-thirds of its arms. Their artillery is very much dependent on Russia. India has always been concerned about growing ties between Russia and China. They've just had this border clash. So the U.S. would understand that.

"Even on the flashpoint of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, where India has been refining Russian oil and the U.S. probably is not happy about that, but at the same time, they have an interest in it because it helps keep the price of oil down, and therefore deals with inflationary pressures. So there's a whole series of factors at work."

Within all of that great power manoeuvring, the assassination plots do not loom very large. India knows that, and knows it occupies an enviable diplomatic position at the moment as the non-aligned player everyone wants on their team. And the experts say those geopolitical considerations are likely to trump all others


Xi undercut the West by negotiating a truce in China's long feud with India

Tom Porter,Hannah Abraham
Updated Fri, October 25, 2024 



China's Xi Jinping negotiated a truce with India's leader, Narendra Modi.


They agreed to a patrolling arrangement on a disputed Himalayan border.


The deal is a snub to the US, that's been building an alliance of powers to counter China.

At the BRICS summit in Russia this week, China's leader Xi Jinping and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi shook hands for the first time in five years.

The symbolic moment came after a deal was struck to resolve a long-standing feud between the Asian superpowers.

In the lead-up to the summit, the countries announced they had reached a patrolling agreement that would reduce tensions along a disputed Himalayan border.

The dispute had led to deadly hand-to-hand combat in recent years, taking the lives of 20 Indian troops and at least four Chinese soldiers.

After their meeting at the summit hosted by Russia's President Vladimir Putin, Xi and Modi said they would continue discussions on resolving the issue.
A setback for the US

Some analysts believe it is a development that's unlikely to be welcomed in Washington, DC.

The US has sought to recruit India to help it contain China's growing regional aggression alongside other members of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, a security pact that also includes Japan and Australia.

"So definitely, this is a setback for the United States of America's Indo-Pacific outlook, given the kind of rapprochement we are seeing in India-China relations, and particularly India, China and Russia coming together," Jagannath Panda, head of the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs, told Business Insider.

"Putin, Xi, and Modi meeting definitely signals that there is a kind of understanding under the carpet that has happened, which is quite subtle," he said.

It's an assessment echoed by Zhiqun Zhu, professor of political science and international affairs at Bucknell University.

"The thaw in India-China relations is a boon to both countries. This is particularly significant for China because India may now be less inclined to confront Beijing as part of Quad," Zhu told Voice of America. "In this sense, the effectiveness of Quad would be diluted with a less enthusiastic India."
Competition between Asia's rival powers intensifies

Tensions have been building between China and India for years.

As the two biggest economies in Asia, the countries have long jostled for regional power, with the dispute over the Himalayan border a flashpoint that led to clashes in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

Amid the stand-off, Chinese vessels have reportedly surveilled the Indian Ocean in what experts told Reuters was a likely intelligence-gathering operation, while India has strengthened its security ties with China's chief global rival, the US.

In 2017 India played a key role in restarting the Quad, an alliance designed as a bulwark against growing Chinese influence and aggression in the Asia-Pacific region.

But India has long sought to balance its relationship with rival superpowers the US and China, and does not at this point want to tie itself too closely to either side, say analysts.

In addition to being a member of the Quad Alliance, it is a founding member of the BRICS, an association of non-Western economies that China has sought to transform into an alternative global economic power base to the US.


An Indian army convoy drives towards Leh, on a highway bordering China.Yawar Nazir via Getty Images

"This explains why it remains part of multilateral groupings with contradictory goals," said Praveen Donthi, a South Asia analyst with the International Crisis Group in Washington, DC, pointing to both its membership of the US-aligned Quad and China-dominated BRIC group.

The truce comes with China on the back foot diplomatically, said Panda, pointing to its damaged relations with Europe and the US after its support for Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

"One could draw a conclusion at this point that probably the Chinese are more interested to rebuild the ties with India than the other way round," said Panda.

He said there's also the possibility that Xi has reached an agreement with Modi behind the scenes for India to remain silent if China acts on its longstanding ambition to seize back control of Taiwan.

Such a move would likely draw in the US and its other regional allies, who have pledged to help defend Taiwan's independence.

"I think China's bigger ambition and target is the Taiwan issue, and therefore they would not really like to continue the kind of tensions they were engaged in with India for the last three to four years," he said.

"Therefore, they would like to rebuild, and they would like to ensure that India does not react to the Taiwan issue so sensitively."

In any case, its a setback in US attempts to include India in a deeper security alliance, he said.

"For a long time, the US has tried to develop security and defense ties with India," said Panda.

For the time being, a truce suits both Russian and Chinese interests, Rahul Bhatia, an analyst at the Eurasia Group, said. But, he added, tensions remain.

He said that though both parties have opened discussions about the border dispute, the underlying problem remains unresolved, and future flare-ups are likely.

Donthi said the progress between the leaders could also be derailed if tensions between the US and China increase.

"This comes as a relief after four years of eyeball-to-eyeball troop deployment in the Himalayas. However, it's only the beginning," he said.