Sunday, November 03, 2024

YouGov poll: 1 in 8 women say they have voted differently than their partner without telling them

Nicholas Liu
SALON
Fri, November 1, 2024 

Woman looking at vote by mail ballot postcard Getty Images/AJ_Watt


An ad reminding women that they can vote differently from their partners — and aren't obliged to tell them about it — appears to be touching on a very real phenomenon. According to a YouGov poll, 1 in 8 women voted differently from their partners in an election without telling them.

That's about the same percentage as men who said they've done so. In 2016, when Donald Trump had not yet completed his takeover of the Republican Party, his "shy" supporters maintained that no one is obliged to share who they voted for.

In an election where women's rights and health have moved to center stage in wake of abortion bans and Trump's threats to "protect" women against their will, disagreements within opposite-sex relationships might be more common. Women have typically voted for the Democratic candidate at a higher rate than men, but polls have shown an even wider gender gap in this election cycle, with women backing Vice President Kamala Harris by as much as 12% over Trump.

That's a stark contrast to the 46% of men in the YouGov survey who believed that their partners would be voting for Trump, versus the 40% who said the same about Harris.

For many Trump supporters, the idea of Harris winning would be infuriating enough, but conservative TV figures and activists added another dimension to the rage in MAGA circles: a woman daring to challenge the primacy of a man, who is none the wiser. The woman with a hat and American flag in the offending pro-Harris ad, Charlie Kirk complained, “coming in with her sweet husband, who probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life and provides for the family, and she lies to him saying I’m going to vote for Trump, then she votes for Kamala Harris as her little secret in the voting booth.”


Julia Roberts ad sparks debate about gender gap, voting in marriages

Caroline Vakil
Fri, November 1, 2024

Julia Roberts ad sparks debate about gender gap, voting in marriages

pro-Harris campaign ad encouraging women to break with their Trump-supporting partners at the ballot box is striking a nerve amid signs of a growing national gender gap in the high-stakes presidential race.

Vote Common Good, which encourages evangelical and Catholic voters to break from the GOP, aired an ad voiced by actress Julia Roberts reminding women “you can vote any way you want and no one will ever know” — prompting pushback from several prominent conservatives who criticized it for calling on wives to lie to their husbands.

Polls show a significant gap, with Vice President Harris winning over a large majority of female voters and former President Trump building up a huge advantage with male voters.

This difference would get attention in any presidential cycle, but it feels all the more important in the first presidential contest to take place since the fall of Roe v. Wade.

“It’s definitely significant and has the potential of being historic,” explained Jackie Payne, the founder and executive director of the nonpartisan, moderate women-focused group Galvanize Action.

“When I’m looking at the data, what I see is, if only men voted, Trump would win,” said Payne, adding that “women are making this a competitive election.”

In the 30-second ad featuring Roberts, a couple are at a polling place when a man prompts his female partner, presumably after voting, “your turn honey.”

The woman, wearing a hat with a bedazzled American flag on it, is seen walking to her voting booth where she weighs choosing between Harris and Trump.

She looks up at another woman voting in front of her and the two exchange a knowing glance, before marking her ballot for Harris.

In the background, Roberts invokes the issue of abortion rights in her voice-over. “In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote anyway you want, and no one will ever know.”

Toward the end of the ad, her husband asks if she “made the right choice,” to which she smiles and says “sure did, honey.”

Fox News host Jesse Watters mentioned his own spouse in discussing the ad, comparing a woman who doesn’t tell her husband who she is voting for to someone having an affair.

“If I found out Emma was going to the voting booth and pulling the lever for Harris, that’s the same thing as having an affair,” Watters said on air Wednesday in response to the ad.

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk called it “gross” to suggest women would “undermine their husbands.”

The ad isn’t the only effort this cycle to remind voters that their ballots are private, or to suggest that women and men are casting different ballots this fall.

NBC News reported pro-Harris sticky notes have been found in women’s bathroom stalls and on the backs of tampon boxes. And women are taking to a TikTok trend in which Harris-Walz voters share that they’ll “cancel out” a pro-Trump husband or family member’s ballot.

Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who’s doing work for independent expenditure groups in the presidential election, suggested the Harris ad with Julia Roberts could be effective, even if it doesn’t completely capture the dynamic she’s found in some relationships when it comes to voting.

“When we’re trying to interview them or if you’re canvassing these married women, they’ll say, ‘Well, you should really be talking to my husband. He knows more about this, or he follows politics,’ or ‘I just get his opinion on politics,’” Lake explained.

“These women presume that he has greater expertise, and he presumes that he has greater expertise. And so the first part of moving these women is to say you have your own way of doing things. You have your own opinion,” she added.

Polling the extent to which couples may vote differently from each other is challenging to accurately measure given votes are privately cast and respondents may not always offer that information to pollsters.

Still, it raises questions over how men and women will cast their votes this cycle — and how big a split it could be.

The gender gap was at 11 percentage points in the 2016 presidential election, with 42 percent of women and 52 percent of men backing Trump, according to Edison Research compiled by the Center for American Woman and Politics at the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University.

In 2020, the gap was 12 points, with 57 percent of women and 45 percent of men backing President Biden.

In 2024, there are signs of a growing divide.

An October USA Today/Suffolk University national poll found women decidedly behind Harris, 53 percent to 36 percent. Men were behind Trump 53 percent to 36 percent. If similar splits show up on Nov. 5, it could make for a historic gender gap.

Payne of Galvanize Action explained that moderate white women were driving the gender gap. At the same time, Zachary Donnini, a data scientist at Decision Desk HQ, noted gaps were emerging among Black and Latino voters, too.

Polls have also suggested a deepening split among young voters in particular. Motivated by threats to reproductive rights and turned off by GOP rhetoric, young women are tending more liberal, experts said — while young men are pulled in by Trump’s messaging around masculinity.

Women, who have long outpaced men in voter turnout, are also dominating early voting, according to the latest data compiled by the University of Florida Election Lab, making up 54 percent of the 66 million early votes so far.

Only Election Day will reveal how many female voters are actually part of the hesitant demographic depicted in the Vote Common Good ad, said Martha McKenna, a Democratic strategist and veteran of EMILY’s List, a group aimed at getting abortion-rights female candidates elected to office.

But McKenna argued many moderate Republican and independent women are “feeling squeezed” this cycle. Even the Republican “outrage” at the new ad, she said, could make the case for the ad’s message.

“Republicans fell straight into the trap that the ad laid out for them,” McKenna said, pointing to the responses from right-wing talkers.

“They have so far overreacted to this discussion in the final days of the campaign that they’ve really exposed themselves … It is, like, embarrassing almost — how upset these guys were at the thought that the women in their lives would not vote the way that they wanted them to, for Trump.”

Still, there are nuances within measuring the gap between how women and men vote for the winning presidential candidate.

Kelly Dittmar, director of research and scholar at the Center for American Women and Politics, noted it’s possible there could be a record in the gender gap this presidential cycle while noting women have been more likely to vote for the Democratic presidential candidate since 1980.

“Anybody is going to be able to argue that women are the key to this election. But I think the more interesting story and the trends to watch are going to be, which women, how do they trend,” she explained. “What is the diversity among women voters?”

Kim Wyman, a senior fellow at the Bipartisan Policy Center and the former Republican secretary of state in Washington, said the dynamics in the Vote Common Good ad aren’t limited to the gender divide.

“I really do believe that this election, based on what we saw in 2016 and what we saw in 2020, saying to people how you voted, and it doesn’t matter which side you say you voted, can get a very emotional response from friends and family and people you’ve known your whole life,” Wyman said. “And I think that for many Americans, they just kind of want to avoid it.”

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. 


Julia Roberts Reminds Americans 'Our Children Are Watching' In Female-Led Voting Ad

Kelly Coffey-Behrens
Sat, November 2, 2024 

Scroll back up to restore default view.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

Julia Roberts has launched a new ad campaign, encouraging Americans to make their voices heard in support of Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz in the upcoming election.

Taking to Instagram, the "Pretty Woman" actress shared the female-led campaign video, emphasizing the importance of voting and the impact it has on future generations.

The video shared on Julia Roberts' Instagram page is filled with messages centered on equality and the preservation of fundamental rights, and urges viewers to “Vote for us, vote for her, vote for Kamala.”
Hilary Clinton, Betsy Ross, And More Are Featured In Julia Roberts' Campaign Video

MEGA

Featuring appearances from influential female figures, both historical and contemporary—including activist Betsy Ross, Hilary Clinton, and soccer star Megan Rapinoe—the ad campaign taps into a legacy of women’s leadership and advocacy, connecting past struggles with today’s battles for equality.


A recurring theme in the video is the protection of women’s rights, with particular emphasis on Roe v. Wade and issues of reproductive freedom. The ad reflects a call for action at a critical time, reminding viewers that the choices they make will shape the future, not just for themselves but for generations to come.

“Our children are watching,” Roberts wrote in the caption, a message from Liz Cheney's opening statement at Capitol Riot hearing in July 2021.
Julia Roberts Sends A Message To Every American Woman With New Ad Campaign

With a focus on unity and collective action, the campaign echoes Roberts’ own advocacy for civic engagement, highlighting the belief that voting is both a right and a powerful tool for change.

In addition to using historical photos and videos of prominent women, Roberts also used Laura Bell Bundy's song, "American Girl," which includes the lyrics:

"Why’s it so hard being an American girl
Why’s it so hard living in a first-problem world
When the American promise is the land of the free
But I’m waiting for the bill for the air that I breath
Why’s it so hard being an American girl."

In sharing this message, Roberts and her fellow advocates aim to remind Americans that their voices have the potential to drive progress and shape a future rooted in equality and justice.

Julia Roberts' Campaign Ad Tells Women They Can Vote Differently From Their Husbands



A recent campaign ad narrated by Roberts for the Harris-Walz ticket has sparked widespread debate after its release by the progressive evangelical group "Vote Common Good" on Monday, October 28.

"In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote any way you want, and no one will ever know," Roberts said in the ad, which features two women casting their votes for Vice President Harris and Minnesota Governor Walz.

When they rejoin their husbands, one husband asks his wife, “Did you make the right choice?” to which she responds confidently, “Sure did, honey.”
Julia Roberts Faces Backlash For Recent Campaign

MEGA

Intended to empower women voters with the message that they can vote independently of their husbands, the ad has instead faced backlash, with many critics calling it out-of-touch and patronizing.

"Julia Roberts does the voice-over for this execrable political ad," Boyce College Professor Denny Burk posted to X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. "The gist of it is this: Since men like your husband have taken away your right to choose abortion, you can stick it to them by exercising your right to choose Harris-Walz."

Author and columnist Caryn Sullivan said, "Don't be that woman."
Social Media Slams Julia Roberts For 'Encouraging' Women To 'Lie' To Their Husbands


MEGA

The backlash didn't stop there...

"This ad featuring actress Julia Roberts encourages women to defy or lie to their husbands because the end (abortion) justifies the means," Sullivan added. "A fitting way to end a campaign marked by dishonesty and false claims of unity.

"Women aren't stupid. This is absurdly condescending," one X user said.


"Can you imagine?": Trump rages over pro-Harris ad urging MAGA wives to vote freely

Griffin Eckstein
Sat, November 2, 2024 

Donald Trump Emily Elconin/Getty Images

Donald Trump is not happy about a ad urging wives of Trump-supporting spouses to vote for Kamala Harris in secret.

The former president complained about the ad from Vote Common Good during a call to Fox News on Saturday morning. Trump expressed skepticism that women would have to hide their political beliefs from their husbands.

“The wives and husbands, I don’t think that’s the way they deal,” Trump said. “I mean, can you imagine a wife not telling a husband who she's voting for? Did you ever hear anything like that? Even if you had a horrible — if you had a bad relationship, you're gonna tell your husband.”



twitter.com/atrupar/status/1852729589119758737

The candidate added that he’s “disappointed in Julia Roberts" for her role in the ad. In a voiceover, the actress reminded women that they “can vote any way you want, and no one will ever know.”

“She’s gonna look back on it and she’s gonna cringe,” Trump said. “It doesn’t really say much about her relationship, I’m sure she has a great relationship.”

A recent YouGov poll suggested 1 in 8 women voted differently than their partners without telling them, but that hasn't stopped MAGA men from stewing over the idea. Fox anchor Jesse Watters inadvertently proved the ad's point on air, saying that his wife backing a different candidate would be “the same thing as having an affair.”

The former president’s rebuke of the ad’s message comes days after he promised to protect women “whether the women like it or not.”




Donald Trump Slams Julia Roberts for Narrating Ad Urging Wives to Vote for Kamala Harris: ‘She’s Going to Look Back at That and She’s Going to Cringe’

J. Kim Murphy and Michaela Zee
Sat, November 2, 2024 


Donald Trump criticized Julia Roberts on “Fox & Friends” Saturday for narrating a Harris-Walz campaign ad that reminds women that their vote is their choice, regardless of how their husbands or anyone else may be voting.

“I’m so disappointed at Julia Roberts. She’s going to look back on that and she’s going to cringe. ‘Did I really say that?’” Trump said while calling into the show. “It doesn’t say much for her relationship, but I’m sure she has a great relationship. The wives and the husbands, I don’t think that’s the way they deal. Can you imagine a wife not telling a husband who she’s voting for? Did you ever hear anything like that? Even if you had a horrible — if you had a bad relationship, you’re going to tell your husband. It’s a ridiculous thing. So stupid.”

The Roberts-narrated ad was created by the progressive evangelical group Vote Common Good. In the video, one woman is seen voting for Harris in the booth, even though her husband appears to be leaning towards Trump.

“In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote any way you want and no one will ever know,” Roberts says, nodding to how reproductive rights are in jeopardy if Trump is reelected president.

The woman in the ad who votes for Harris is seen leaving the voting booth and meeting her husband, who asks: “Did you make the right choice?” The wife answers, “Sure did, honey,” and then shares a glance with her female friend that makes it clear voting for Harris is their secret in the voting booth and their husbands will never know.

“Remember,” Roberts adds as the narrator, “what happens in the booth, stays in the booth.”




Donald Trump Is “So Disappointed” In Julia Roberts For Narrating Kamala Harris Ad

Glenn Garner
Sat, November 2, 2024 


With three days until the presidential election, Donald Trump is taking aim at Julia Roberts over her support of Kamala Harris.

On Saturday, the former president called into Fox & Friends, where he criticized the Oscar winner for narrating a recent Vote Common Good ad in support of his opponent, encouraging women to vote for Harris regardless of their husbands’ opinions.

“I’m so disappointed at Julia Roberts,” said Trump in his appearance. “She’s going to look back on that and she’s going to cringe. ‘Did I really say that?’ It doesn’t say much for her relationship, but I’m sure she has a great relationship.”

Trump continued, “But the wives and the husbands, I don’t think that’s the way they deal. Can you imagine a wife not telling a husband who she’s voting for? Did you ever hear anything like that? Even if you have a horrible — if you had a bad relationship, you’re going to tell your husband. It’s a ridiculous ad. So stupid. She’s gonna look back someday, she’s gonna say, ‘Did I really make that?'”

The ad features two women going into their voting booths as their husbands wait for them. They make eye contact as they fill in the bubble for Harris and running mate Tim Walz.

“Did you make the right choice?” one husband asks as his wife responds, “Sure did, honey.”

Roberts says in a voiceover, “In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote any way you want, and no one will ever know. Remember, what happens in the booth stays in the booth. Vote Harris/Walz.”

Trump’s response comes as Harris makes one final push for undecided voters, concluding her historic $370 million paid media campaign with ‘Brighter Future‘, an ad running across CBS and Fox during the 1pm ET slate of NFL games on Saturday.


Trump can’t believe a woman wouldn’t tell her husband who she’s voting for
Clarissa-Jan Lim
Updated Sat, November 2, 2024

Donald Trump Melania Trump fill out their ballots at a polling station on Nov. 8, 2016, in New York.

Donald Trump expressed incredulity that a woman would hide her choice at the ballot box from her husband, trashing an ad from a Democratic group reminding women that their votes are private.

The ad, released by Vote Common Good and narrated by actor Julia Roberts, shows a woman voting for Kamala Harris, the suggestion being that her vote does not align with her husband’s. “In the one place in America where women still have the right to choose, you can vote any way you want,” Roberts says in the video.

In a meandering call-in conversation with “Fox & Friends” on Saturday morning, Trump criticized both the ad and Roberts.

“I’m so disappointed in Julia Roberts — she’s gonna look back on that and she’s gonna cringe, like, ‘Did I really say that?’ It doesn’t say much about her relationship, but I’m sure she has a great relationship,” he said.

“But the wives and husbands, I don’t think that’s the way they deal. I mean, can you imagine a wife not telling her husband who she’s voting for? You ever hear anything like that?” Trump said. “Even if you have a horrible — if you had a bad relationship, you’re gonna tell your husband. It’s a ridiculous ad, it’s so stupid.”

Polls have shown a stark gender divide among voters, particularly young voters, in the presidential election: A majority of women support Harris over Trump, and Trump has been outperforming Harris among men. In trying to close the gap, Trump’s appeals to women have tended to veer into patronizing, vaguely threatening statements.

The Democratic ad, released this week, has also enraged right-wing influencers, as my colleague Ja’han Jones has pointed out. Some of them have suggested women shouldn’t have the right to vote at all if they vote differently from their husbands.

Trump’s dismay at the suggestion that a woman’s vote is entirely her own does recall at least one instance where he seemed concerned about how someone may vote.

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com



"That is sick!": Newt Gingrich loses it over ad informing women they can secretly vote for Harris

Nicholas Liu
Fri, November 1, 2024 at 9:56 AM MDT

Newt Gingrich Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is raging about an ad telling women they don't have to reveal to anyone, including their husbands, how they vote in the 2024 election.

“In the one place in America where women still have a right to choose, you can vote any way you want,” actress Julia Roberts says as a woman casts a ballot for Vice President Kamala Harris. “And no one will ever know.”

Later, her husband asks her: “Did you make the right choice?”



“Sure did, honey,” the woman replies, before Roberts asks viewers to vote for the Harris-Walz ticket.

The ad, produced by the group Vote Common Good, has thrown conservatives into a frenzy. Gingrich joined the chorus in a Thursday interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, who complained about celebrities endorsing Harris en masse.

“These people are dishonest,” Gingrich responded. “And so, for them to tell people to lie is just one further example of the depth of their corruption. I mean, how do you run a country where you’re walking around saying, ‘Wives should lie to their husbands, husbands should lie to their wives’?”

Gingrich, who had an affair during his second marriage, then held Democrats responsible for America's moral degeneration. “I mean, what kind of a totally amoral, corrupt, sick system have the Democrats developed? If you think about it at that level, it is astonishing, the decay," he said, before claiming that the "decay" is why Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who reportedly maintained at least three romantic liaisons outside of his marriage with Cheryl Hines, left the Democratic Party and endorsed former President Donald Trump.

Long before the Roberts ad aired, Gingrich had been using extreme rhetoric to describe the supposed Democratic unraveling of American society. During the 1990 midterm elections, a group led by Gingrich issued pamphlets among Republicans encouraging them to label their opponents with words like "destroy," "collapse," "traitors," "decay" and "sick" as a key mechanism of persuasion. In his interview with Hannity, Gingrich pulled out "sick" three times in less than 10 seconds.

“Instead of having a dignity and patriotism and a sense of morality, these are really sick people,” Gingrich continued. “And the more you watch them, to say, ‘Oh, why don’t you lie to your husband?’ as a publicly advocated ad? That is sick! And I think we ought to have the courage to say this is a sick, dishonest party.”



BLUE WAVE

Most voters in new survey say Trump cares about interests of rich over Harris




Juliann Ventura
Sat, November 2, 2024

A majority of U.S. adults say former President Trump cares more about the needs and problems of wealthy Americans than Vice President Harris, a new survey revealed.

The recent YouGov poll shows that nearly two-thirds of U.S. adults, 63 percent, say Trump cares about the needs of the rich compared to 25 percent who said the same of Harris.

Broken down by party, 30 percent of Democrats and 21 percent of Republicans said Harris cares about the interests of wealthy Americans. For Trump, 69 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of Republicans said the same, according to the survey.

Despite the numbers, Americans largely said Harris cared more about the interests of most voting blocs listed — with the exception of white voters, those who live in rural or suburban areas, Christian Americans and male voters.

The former president outpaced the Democratic nominee with white voters by 51 percent to 29 percent. He also has a razor-thin advantage with rural voters, 29 percent to 28 percent, and suburban voters, 28 percent to 27 percent. With Christians, Trump outpaces Harris with 36 percent to 26 percent, according to the pollster.

He also leads among male voters, garnering 45 percent to the vice president’s 25 percent. Harris, however, has the advantage with women — with 48 percent saying she cares about their needs over 28 percent who said the same about Trump, the survey found.

The vice president also tops Trump with Black Americans, elderly and young voters, middle-class Americans and those who are poor, those with college degrees, urban voters, among others, the data shows.

An earlier poll from August found that more respondents, 46 percent, said that Harris cares a lot about the needs and problems of Black Americans than she does now, which sits at 40 percent, according to the latest poll.

Meanwhile, 32 percent of respondents said that Trump doesn’t care at all about the needs and problems of Black Americans, the survey found.

YouGov also revealed that 35 percent of U.S. adults think that the former president doesn’t care at all about the needs and problems of poor Americans. Meanwhile, the survey found that most Americans said that Trump cares about the interests of young Americans, at 28 percent — up from 23 percent in August.

With just a few days left in the White House race, The Hill/Decision Desk HQ’s aggregate of polls shows Harris leading Trump by a slim margin — 48.3 percent to 48 percent.

The YouGov poll surveyed 1,126 U.S. adult citizens from Oct. 10-14. The margin of error for the overall sample was about 4 percentage points.

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Opinion

The last temptation of Donald Trump: How he lured evangelicals to follow Satan


Nathaniel Manderson
Sun, November 3, 2024

Donald Trump Photo illustration by Salon/Getty Images

Many distractions in this life can take a person away from their true path. Even as I put these words together, I think about everything unrelated to my writing. I think about my career and need to find work that gets me out of being constantly underemployed. I find myself looking around the coffee shop where I write. I watch other people talking. I wonder about their lives, and why they seem to have figured out something I have not. Sometimes my mind goes back to my history of making historically bad decisions. I think about my bills, my kids, past partners, my family and all the ways I generally feel sorry for myself. All the while good work needs to be done. In my own understanding, God's work needs to be done, yet this world's distractions and temptations keep me far from the ministry and teachings of Jesus Christ.

As I consider the temptations in my own life, I realize that the current leadership of the evangelical church in America — which is my own religious background — has fallen prey to the temptations offered by Donald Trump. These temptations are eerily similar to the temptations the devil offered Jesus in the desert, before Jesus began his ministry.

For those of you who do not know this story, which is told most famously in the Gospel of Luke, Jesus goes into the desert to fast for 40 days and prepare himself to do his work. At this time, Satan comes to him, offering the same three temptations, at least as Christians understand it, that can pull anyone and everyone off their true path. They are the same temptations Trump has offered to the evangelical movement, with the difference being that the evangelical movement has chosen to follow Trump as he leads them away from God and closer to the path set forth by the devil himself.

The first temptation was the offer of turning stones into bread. Jesus would have been starving by that time, but his famous reply was that man does not live on bread alone. I must admit that the thought of having more money — more bread, both literally and metaphorically — is as powerful to me as to anyone else. I want to provide more for my daughters, and every time I have to explain to them why I can't afford something, it breaks my heart. Yet I also understand money has the potential to take me down a dangerous path, away from my true calling as a teacher and counselor.

Trump has offered the evangelical church a lot of bread, and the possibility to live the way he does. There are invitations to Mar-a-Lago, trips on the Trump plane, tax breaks for the wealthy and, on a larger scale, an economy that is constructed to benefit the richest people in our society, prominent evangelical ministers among them. In every area of life, when money becomes the end goal, community is undermined, art suffers and the truth is distorted. The church is no different. Evangelical leaders, by the way, are terrified of this message. They twist themselves into theological knots teaching and preaching that it's OK to be both a millionaire and a minister to the gospel of Christ.

I don't know if it is or it isn't, but I do know there is a specific message in the gospel about the temptation of greed, and I know that temptation can undermine the teachings of Jesus Christ. Somehow or other, for many evangelical Christians, paying proper wages to the working class, offering opportunities to the disadvantaged and welcoming foreigners have become evil things, and providing tax breaks for billionaires has become a foundation of the Christian faith. Trump has offered evangelical leaders almost limitless bags of cash, and those leaders will do anything to get their hands on it.

The devil's second temptation is the offer of protection and safety. In the gospel, he urges Jesus to jump off the roof of the temple — if he is truly the son of God, surely his father, will protect him. Jesus replies that we must not put the Lord God to the test. This is an interesting temptation that we often encounter in life. The desire for comfort, safety and protection is almost universal. In my career, I have greatly desired job protection, for example, but that is never guaranteed when you are committed to telling the truth. Diplomacy was never my strong suit and my working life has been a struggle. I wish it weren't that way, but over time it has taught me that sometimes security becomes more important to people than their own integrity.

I see that in the evangelical support of Donald Trump. His offer of protection is clear, and something he discusses all the time. He promises to keep the Christians safe from the evil forces of liberalism. The left is coming for your guns, he tells them. They will persecute you for your Christian faith. Your children are in danger of conversion by the "woke" mob on college campuses, on television, in the big cities. Never fear, believing Christians, Donald Trump will keep you safe.

The problem with this message — other than the fact that it comes from the devil — is that there was no promise of safety for those who chose to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Indeed, it is the follower who risks their own safety by choosing to love their enemies, heal the sick, serve the poor and love those who are cast out, imprisoned or powerless. That is hard to do under any circumstances, but especially for someone who is sitting at home on their couch and is only interested in the rights of people who agree with them and think as they do.

It should be obvious that Jesus Christ did not live a safe life, a protected life or a comfortable life. Promises of protection and safety would have taken him off course just as Trump's temptations have taken the evangelical leadership away from what should be their true mission.

The final temptation offered by the devil, and by Trump, is the most obvious. The devil offers Jesus power over the whole world, and all he has to do is kneel before Satan and submit to his authority. I feel that I barely have to write anything here — the truth of this is louder than anything I can put into words. People support politicians, most of the time, based what they perceive as their own self-interest. I am no different. My fight for the working class, and for the first-generation college students I have worked with and supported has been at the heart of my politics. I do not seek power as such, but I definitely want more and better opportunities for the population I love. The idea of gaining personal power and greater influence is a natural temptation but, again, that again could take me away from my true calling on the front lines of this work.

Power does corrupt, as it most certainly has in the case of evangelical support of Donald Trump. Pastor Robert Jeffress is hardly the only example, but no one embodies the corrupting force of that this temptation better than he does. That man loves the power of the White House and the power Trump has provided him. Jeffress will create whatever theological explanation he has to in his efforts to return Trump to the White House.

I often listen to Jeffress on the radio. He's a good speaker, about as good as it gets in the evangelical realm. He likes to tell a story how he managed to talk himself into the Oval Office when he was on a school trip to Washington as a teenager. It may be a more instructive parable than he realizes, because Jeffress has been doing everything he can to return to that office ever since. All he had to do, in fact, was to submit to the authority of Donald Trump. This temptation, the corrupting force of power, can prevent a person of faith from supporting those people they are claiming to help. Once these ministers have tasted that kind of power, it is like an addiction. Nothing else can satisfy them.

My recent employment has been as a hospice chaplain, ministering to dying people and their families. It's a job that stays with you on a very deep level. Every day, I am faced with families who are trying to say goodbye to a loved one, and with people who are trying to say goodbye to life. This is not always a peaceful transition, no matter what many of us would like to believe. There is sometimes great anxiety, loss of control and anger.

What I have learned is a great but simple truth: Death comes for all of us, regardless. People of faith, successful people, people who have failed, people who believe they have done everything right and people who have done almost everything wrong. Their lives before the final stage hardly matter, and those final days are often difficult and sad. The comforts of this world have left them. Power, safety and money are all gone, and revealed as empty pursuits in the end. Those things — the temptations of Trump and the devil — only tend to keep a person from their true path, distorting their relationships, their careers, their family life, their art or their writing, their politics and their faith.

I have reached the inescapable conclusion that the teachings of Christ and the teachings of the evangelical church in America are going in opposite directions. The evangelical church is heading closer to the devil. It has submitted to Donald Trump and moved ever further away from a man who served the poor, healed the sick, loved his neighbors and taught his followers to do the same. Evangelical leaders have stopped listening to Christ. There is only one other alternative.




How the Christian right is twisting the legacy of an anti-Nazi hero

This article is co-published with Documented

Leading figures on the Christian right have seized on an unlikely hero in their campaign against secular government: Dietrich Bonhoeffer, an antifascist theologian and pastor who resisted the Nazi regime before he was executed in 1945.

Driving the trend is Eric Metaxas, a prolific author, speaker and celebrity on the Christian right, whose writings on Bonhoeffer and American politics provide the intellectual fodder for a movement that seeks to turn evangelicals against liberal policies on women’s rights, LGBTQ+ inclusion and racial justice.

In the short term, this push has taken the form of a well-funded voter mobilization campaign ahead of the 5 November presidential election, with conservative organizations coordinating to screen Metaxas’s 2024 film – which lays out an argument equating liberal policies with Nazism, and urges believers to emulate Bonhoeffer – in churches across the country.

In the long run, experts worry that the push to liken American liberal democracy to Nazi Germany could spur political violence, citing past examples of Christian extremists who invoked Bonhoeffer to justify bombing and shooting up abortion clinics.

“We’re worried about post-election political violence, and this is a way of inspiring that,” said Victoria Barnett, a theologian and eminent scholar of Bonhoeffer and the Holocaust who has advocated for a nuanced understanding of Bonhoeffer and has cautioned against depicting Bonhoeffer as a kind of evangelical “Lone Ranger”.

According to documents obtained by the Guardian and Documented, the production and distribution of the movie, called Letter to the American Church, was coordinated by the rightwing group Turning Point USA and American Letter Productions – the film division of Metaxas Media, an entertainment business founded by Eric Metaxas.

Related: Why experts say Christian nationalists’ rhetoric may spur violence

Through the Letter to the American Church tour, an initiative launched in mid-2024, these groups and others have screened the film at churches, community organizations, and small groups for donations of any amount; churches willing to screen the film received an “extensive marketing kit” to promote it.

Funding for this film and tour was pledged, in part, by the secretive Christian donor network Ziklag, a non-profit that embraces the aims of a growing movement of Christian nationalists who strive to rule over US government and society. As a piece of Ziklag’s larger, coordinated effort to get out the vote, the group committed to funding movie screenings in churches across the country “with a focus on oversaturation in the battleground states” to galvanize congregations and increase evangelical voter turnout.

Since its launch, the film has been screened at least 170 times across the country, including more than 40 times in key swing states. Local GOP chapters and numerous outside organizations on the right have also held screenings, some in conjunction with poll worker sign-up initiatives and alongside Turning Point Action, a group the Trump campaign has relied on for its voter registration and turnout efforts.

Internal videos produced by Ziklag, obtained by the Guardian and Documented, detail Ziklag’s 2024 election strategy, pledging $800,000 to “focus on rallying the church behind biblically based voting using Eric Metaxas’ new documentary, Letter to the American Church”. Organizations that partnered with Metaxas, including Turning Point Action and TPUSA Faith, were promised donations from Ziklag in this effort to engage evangelical voters.

Ziklag and Turning Point USA did not return requests for comment.

In an email, Metaxas denied having “anything to do with the making of the LETTER film” – although he stars in the movie and founded one of the companies that produced it. Metaxas rejected the term “Christian nationalism”, saying it is used to “demonize people who believe that we Christians are obliged to live our faith in every sphere, including the political.”

And he suggested that Bonhoeffer scholars and his critics were in fact the ones inciting political violence, not him.

‘Co-opted by extremists’

Born in 1906 and raised in a family of intellectuals and academics, Bonhoeffer dedicated himself as a young man to theology and ministry. At 21 years old, he wrote a dissertation exploring the idea of Christians’ ethical and moral obligations to one another and society.

But Bonhoeffer’s prodigious academic career was cut short by the rise of Hitler’s Nazi party.

An early dissident, Bonhoeffer wrote in 1933 that the Hitler government’s increasingly discriminatory and violent oppression of Jews was a “problem for the church”, which he viewed as responsible for opposing such policies, even if they were not directed at Christians.

His work in the following decade, with other dissenting clergy and networks of resisters, would eventually lead the regime to accuse him of aiding in a plot to assassinate Hitler. He was arrested in 1943 and hanged in 1945 in the Flossenbürg concentration camp, leaving behind his letters from prison and numerous writings on ethics, morality and the role of Christians in a secular, modern society.

Before he was executed, Bonhoeffer warned of the dangers of zealotry and groupthink – perils he believed societies face during times of political upheaval.

“[The] upsurge of power is so terrific that it deprives men of an independent judgement,” wrote Bonhoeffer, “and they give up trying – more or less unconsciously – to assess the new state of affairs for themselves.”

Scholars of Bonhoeffer, and Bonhoeffer’s living relatives, have argued that Bonhoeffer teaches Christians to reject nationalisms of all kinds.

To their dismay, Christian nationalists have embraced Bonhoeffer, frequently invoking his participation in the 20 July 1944 plot to assassinate Hitler as an example of moral courage. In this interpretation, Bonhoeffer is cast not as the contemplative theologian who agonized over his role in the antifascist resistance, but as a Christian warrior with the political leanings of a 21st-century American evangelical.

Tobias Korenke, Bonhoeffer’s great-nephew, has expressed frustration about the use of Bonhoeffer by the religious right, saying in a recent interview with Germany’s Die Zeit newspaper that Bonhoeffer’s name had been “co-opted by extremists”.

At its worst, this interpretation of Bonhoeffer has led to violence. Michael Bray, a pastor who was convicted for his role in bombing numerous abortion clinics in 1984 and 1985, cited Bonhoeffer as an inspiration. Paul Jennings Hill, an anti-abortion zealot who shot and killed a physician at an abortion clinic in 1994, too, invoked Bonhoeffer.

Metaxas’s political evolution

One evangelical celebrity who has consistently and effectively worked to popularize Bonhoeffer on the right is Eric Metaxas, a Yale-educated talkshow host whose popular biography of Bonhoeffer helped introduce the historical figure to a broader audience in the US.

Metaxas’ 2009 book, Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy, was marketed to Christians but achieved popular acclaim – serving as a biography and an inspirational history for readers familiar and unfamiliar with Bonhoeffer.

To explain Bonhoeffer’s participation in the resistance, Metaxas writes that God had called him to “get his hands dirty”.

In turn the New York-based Metaxas, already an unusual east coast ambassador for conservative evangelicalism, achieved a new level of fame.

“He was the rare figure in the evangelical world who was mixing it up with the culture shapers and the intellectuals in New York City,” said John Fea, a historian who has documented the rise of contemporary Christian nationalism. “And then the Bonhoeffer book came out, and that skyrocketed him.”

At the 2012 National Prayer Breakfast, an annual gala in Washington convening lawmakers and Christian faith leaders, Metaxas spoke about the genesis of his Bonhoeffer biography in a speech delivered with the cadence and occasional vulnerability of a stand-up routine.

Fifteen minutes into the 30-minute talk, Metaxas reflected on the book’s widespread popularity, joking that “it was read even by president George W Bush, who is intellectually incurious, as we’ve all read. He read the book.”

Metaxas paused, turning to Barack and Michelle Obama, who were seated to his right. “No pressure,” he added, and thrust a copy of the book into the hands of the president, who played along, smiling for a photo with the book.

During the remainder of his speech, Metaxas became sharply political, railing in particular against abortion.

“This is a Bonhoeffer moment,” Metaxas declared, implicitly comparing abortion to the Holocaust and calling on Christians to intervene in the manner that many Germans did not.

In the decade that followed, Metaxas’s political evolution has turned even more dramatically to the right. In a 2016 column in the Wall Street Journal, he endorsed Donald Trump, acknowledging his reservations about the real estate mogul but writing that if Christians voted for Hillary Clinton, “God will not hold us guiltless,” citing abortion as a top issue.

Metaxas eventually embraced Maga politics fully, vowing to support Trump as the former president falsely claimed the 2020 presidential election had been stolen and attempted to overturn the results.

“This is the most horrible thing that has happened in the history of our nation,” Metaxas told Trump on 30 November, in a since deleted recording of a phone call between Metaxas and the former president that ran on Metaxas’s show. “I’d be happy to die in this fight,” he told Trump later in the call.

Experts question the underpinnings of Metaxas’ work on Bonhoeffer. A recent petition circulated by eight Bonhoeffer scholars, and signed by dozens of clergy and scholars of religion, argues that Metaxas “has manipulated the Bonhoeffer story to support Christian Nationalism”.

It warns that in his social media posts and public appearances, Metaxas “glorifies violence and draws inappropriate analogies between our political system and that of Nazi Germany”.

Barnett argues that Metaxas’s book overstated Bonhoeffer’s role in the plot to assassinate Hitler and that Metaxas “tapped right into” a “mythology that Bonhoeffer was like the Lone Ranger, the Christian hero who fought the Nazis”.

In fact, the full extent of Bonhoeffer’s role in the conspiracy has been disputed – and however closely involved he might have been in the plot, Bonhoeffer did not legitimize political violence in religious terms.

“He did not justify his knowledge of the conspiracy on his being Christian – he just refused to do that, because he understood the dangers of that,” said Barnett.

Blurred lines between religion and politics

In Letter to the American Church, Metaxas, who narrates much of the documentary-style film, and a roster of rightwing pastors and activists take the Bonhoeffer narrative a step further, casting liberals and Democrats as being as destructive as Nazis and calling on evangelicals to take action and oppose evil.

They insist liberal teachings are destroying the family and religion in an effort to strip away freedoms from the American people. The speakers warn that if evangelicals do not rise up against ideas that they portray as evil, such as LGBTQ+ rights and women’s rights, the country is headed for destruction.

At the heart of their argument is Bonhoeffer.

Bonhoeffer effectively told the church that if we’re going to see any effective change for the better, they needed to start taking action and getting political,” Metaxas tells his audience in the film. “He said those who call themselves Christians have an obligation to God to get political if necessary, and to take a bold and likely dangerous stance against their own government.

Letter to the American Church has partnered with influential rightwing organizations, including the pro-Trump Moms for America, the anti-LGBTQ+ Her Voice Movement, and Patriot Academy – a Christian nationalist group that seeks to rewrite the constitution – to promote the film and spread its message. The organization also partnered with Million Voices, an evangelical get-out-the-vote initiative, to launch a “Pledge to Vote” campaign, aiming to see “250,000 pledge to vote” after seeing the movie.

The effort highlights how some tax-exempt religious organizations push the boundaries of legal restrictions on electioneering.

Churches are banned from issuing endorsements or campaigning on behalf of a candidate, but they may be able to participate in the screenings without fear of incurring legal penalties, said Andrew Seidel, a constitutional attorney who specializes in first amendment and religious freedoms cases.

“One of the ways that this Christian nationalist movement has started operating in the political space, is to create these kinds of movies and then push them out through churches,” he said.

Despite the timing of the screenings – which end on election day – and the film’s ultra-political content, “the churches would all have, probably, some pretty credible deniability, if they said: ‘Hey, we were just [given] a chance to run a movie we thought our folks would be interested in.’”

•••

The Letter to the American Church tour officially ends on 5 November – but don’t expect Bonhoeffer to go away anytime soon.

A splashy feature film, Bonhoeffer: Pastor. Spy. Assassin, is to debut in theaters across the US on 22 November. Bonhoeffer, the movie, features a star-studded cast of German actors and promises to be a captivating second world war drama. (Americans might recognize August Diehl, who plays the resistance theologian Martin Niemöller, from his role in Quentin Tarantino’s Inglourious Basterds, or the 2010 thriller Salt).

Posters for the movie show Bonhoeffer carrying a gun. “With world-shattering stakes,” the Christian streaming company Angel Studios writes in its promotional materials for the film, Bonhoeffer “begs the question, how far will you go to stand up for what’s right?”

Bonhoeffer scholars reject this gun-toting version of the theologian – and the film’s “how-far-would-you-go” framing. “[In] the current, highly-polarized climate in the United States, these are dangerous words,” wrote the leaders of the English and German-language International Bonhoeffer Society last month in Die Zeit.

In their petition, the scholars warn more broadly of a possible uptick in violence after the election linked to the Christian far right.

“Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s words and witness will be used to pit one side against the other, to fight ‘evil’, to put ‘America First’, and to justify violence,” they write. “The misalignment between these views and actions and Bonhoeffer’s own cannot be overstated. When you hear these grievous misuses, and you will, do not be fooled.”

 


Stormy Daniels Awarded In Salem For Enduring Actual 'Witch Hunt'

Marco Margaritoff
Fri, November 1, 2024 

Stormy Daniels Awarded In Salem For Enduring Actual 'Witch Hunt'
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.Generate Key Takeaways

Stormy Daniels, the adult film performer whose alleged affair with Donald Trump spawned the historic hush money trial that he decried as a “witch hunt,” received a witchy award Thursday on Halloween for surviving his attempts to spin the narrative.

The ceremony was held in Salem, Massachusetts, the site of the infamous Salem Witch Trials during the late 1600s, which saw hundreds accused — and around 20 executed — as supposed “witches.”

Daniels was appropriately dressed like one when she accepted the first annual “Salem Witches’ Woman of Power Award” at the town commons and, in front of hundreds of fellow witches, chronicled living in a mobile home as a result of the blowback from her testimony about the former president.

“I was put on the stand two years ago and someone said I was unfit to testify because I was a witch,” said Daniels, per The Guardian. “I was honest, I was telling the truth and I was persecuted. To me this award should inspire others to speak up and not be silenced.”

Daniels told the Boston Globe she “screamed like a little girl” when she learned about the honor, which recognizes strength, intuition and “magic,” as she has been a self-described witch since childhood.

“No one understands what the last six years have been like for me,” she added. “Everyone else gets to turn off the TV and forget about politics, which has reached this next-level, dark insanity. I don’t get that opportunity. I’m living in an RV because I can’t go home. The persecution those witches felt hundreds of years ago feels very familiar to me.”

Daniels, at the center of a
Daniels, at the center of a "magic circle" Thursday, candidly chronicled her own witch hunt. Andrew Burke-Stevenson/The Boston Globe/Getty Images

Christian Day, a self-described warlock who organized the event, praised Daniels.

“A lot of people know Stormy for being a porn star and fighting against Trump in court,” he told attendees, per the Guardian. “But a lot of people don’t know that she is a practicing witch, and that she is someone who stands out as a woman of power.”

Trump was convicted earlier this year on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to hide his $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels. He might well retake the White House next week. Daniels, meanwhile, says she’s lived “on the run” ever since her home address was displayed in court. (Trump’s attorney has said this was an accident.)

The adult film actor launched a GoFundMe in June to raise money for a new house, and to help her escape the rape and death threats from Trump’s supporters.


ILLEGAL ALIEN

Elon Musk Could Lose His Citizenship For Lying On Immigration Forms


Amber DaSilva
Fri, November 1, 2024 


Photo: Michael M. Santiago (Getty Images)

Elon Musk has been on a political kick recently, backing former President and current presidential candidate Donald Trump in his various crusades — including his fight against undocumented immigration. Ironic, then, that Musk himself could risk having his citizenship stripped for that same crime.

Earlier this week a report from the Washington Post looked into Musk’s history with immigration, and found that the he began his stay in the United States with a student visa — a visa whose bounds he immediately exceeded by dropping out of school to start a business. Wired looked into the laws around Musk’s actions, as far as he’s publicly admitted, and found there may well be an immigration case against one of America’s leading eugenicists:


Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor at Cornell Law School and faculty director of its Immigration Law and Policy Program, says that it’s not clear that if Musk worked in the US without authorization and attested he hadn’t, that would be considered important enough to denaturalize him. However, he says, “on purely legal grounds, this would justify revoking citizenship, because if he had told the truth, he would not have been eligible for an H1-B, a green card, or naturalization.”

...

US law—specifically, 8 U.S.C. § 1451—allows for the revocation of naturalization if citizenship was “procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation.” The classic example of the law’s application is to former Nazis who ultimately had their citizenship stripped in the US after the exposure of their hidden pasts. But the law, experts say, covers lying about having worked without authorization, and there are several points in the process at which an immigrant has to attest, under penalty of perjury, that they haven’t done so.


According to the experts, Musk’s citizenship in the United States may be based on false attestations on government forms. This is what’s known as a “crime,” and could mean that Musk’s residency here is built on loose sand. Ironic for a man so convinced that any undocumented person is a threat. But, then again, maybe his concerns go beyond documents. Maybe he’s more concerned about other factors, like securing a future for white children.
Microsoft buys North Carolina megasite near the Triangle, but won’t say why
Microsoft has purchased a 1,350-acre “megasite” that sits below the Virginia state border, about an hour’s drive north of Durham. · Raleigh News and Observer · Michel Euler/AP

Brian Gordon
Fri, November 1, 2024


One of the world’s most valuable companies took a North Carolina megasite off the market this week as Microsoft notified local officials on Thursday it had completed a $27 million purchase of the Person County Mega Park.

The 1,350-acre site sits below the Virginia border, about an hour’s drive north of Durham. Person officials said they had worked with Microsoft on the sale for the past 18 months.

“Microsoft’s presence in Person County will boost our local economy through direct and indirect means, leading to job creation, sustaining a low tax base, and enhancing housing opportunities, among other benefits,” the county’s economic developer, Brandy Lynch, wrote in an email.

The Mega Park was one of six available “megasites” in the state, each offering companies at least 1,000 contiguous acres. What Microsoft will do with the land isn’t clear.

“We don’t have anything to share at this time about the purchase of land in Person County,” company spokesperson Annette Hamilton said in a statement to The News & Observer. “But we are committed to working with the community as we move forward.”

The Triangle Business Journal first reported Microsoft’s purchase.

In the past few years, Toyota, Wolfspeed and VinFast have claimed all or parts of megasites in the state. But compared to these companies, which promised to hire thousands at each location, Microsoft has made no jobs commitment. It did not receive state or local incentives to help with the purchase.

And one of the company’s top development priorities is less labor intensive. To accommodate rising demand for artificial intelligence, Microsoft has sought to build more U.S. data centers.

According to Bloomberg, the software company last quarter spent more money on data centers — nearly $15 billion — than it used to dedicate to a full year of capital expenditures. In September, Microsoft announced it would rely on the reopened Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania to power centers.

Enjoy Triangle tech news? Subscribe
The US is pumping more oil than ever, and it's complicating things for other crude-exporting countries

Filip De Mott
Sat, November 2, 2024 
Anton Petrus/Getty Images

US crude production hit a new all-time monthly high in August.


This complicates things for OPEC+, which was planning to start increasing output in December.


Oil is down 20% from April highs, causing some exporters to be cautious about how much they're pumping.


The US is pumping a record amount of oil. But that may not be welcome news to other crude-producing nations.

Domestic output reached 13.4 million barrels a day in August, eclipsing all previous monthly records. According to US Energy Information Administration data, firms in Texas and New Mexico led the surge.

That level of production puts the US at odds with the plans of other oil-producing nations. OPEC+, an alliance led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, has said it plans to begin in December a sequence of monthly output increases. But given the decline in the price of crude oil — down 20% from an April high — continued record production from the US, and weakening demand, oil traders believe OPEC+ will delay its program for a second time.

It's the culmination of a multi-year period that saw OPEC+ members cut production to support higher market prices, only to be undercut by expanding production from non-OPEC exporters.

Looking into 2025, analysts speculate that global demand will continue sliding, especially given China's decelerating oil consumption. That's one reason the global oil surplus could swell to 1.2 million barrels per day next year, according to JPMorgan. Otherwise, expanding outflows from the US, Brazil, Guyana and Canada will also play a part.

"OPEC+ increasingly appears to be searching for El Dorado: an oil market where demand is strong enough that it can increase output and prices stay above $80 per barrel," wrote Bill Weatherburn, senior climate and commodities economist at Capital Economics. "We suspect that this won't be found in 2025 either as China's demand growth will remain soft and more oil supply from non-OPEC+ producers will enter the market."

Venezuela's oil exports hit a 4-year peak on higher output, sales to US, India
Oilfield workers hold a flag with the corporate logo of Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA near Cabrutica at the state of Anzoategui · 
Fri, November 1, 2024
By Marianna Parraga and Mircely Guanipa

HOUSTON/MARACAY (Reuters) - Venezuela's oil exports rose to a four-year high, approaching 950,000 barrels per day in October, boosted by growing crude output and more sales to India and the United States, according to shipping data and documents from state firm PDVSA.

The increase happened despite a large storage terminal fire last month, tighter U.S. sanctions since June and the arrest of the country's former oil minister, Pedro Tellechea, and former PDVSA executives over corruption allegations.

A bounce in crude production, mainly due to the stabilization of processing operations at Venezuela's largest oil region, the Orinoco Belt, has allowed the recovery of heavy crude inventories, the PDVSA documents showed.

In total, PDVSA and its joint ventures exported an average of 947,387 bpd of crude and fuel, 21% over the previous month and the highest monthly figure since early 2020, according to the data, based on tanker movements.

The South American country, which has remained under U.S. sanctions since 2019, also exported 314,500 metric tons of oil byproducts and petrochemicals, slightly more than the 267,000 tons of September.

Crude shipments by Chevron to the United States reached a peak of 280,000 bpd, the highest since the U.S. producer resumed exports of Venezuela's heavy grades early last year. Spanish producer Repsol also exported Venezuelan oil cargoes to the U.S. and Spain last month.

PDVSA increased exports to India, which used to be a top market before the sanctions, sending three cargoes, or about 141,000 bpd, last month, the data showed.

Crude deliveries to the U.S., Europe and India are authorized under U.S. licenses to some PDVSA's joint venture partners and customers, including Chevron, Repsol, Eni, Maurel & Prom, and Reliance Industries.

However, China remained the main destination of Venezuela's oil exports in October with 385,300 bpd shipped to the world's top oil importer directly and indirectly. Exports to China had been higher in September, when they averaged some 451,500 bpd.

Venezuela's exports to political ally Cuba, which is struggling to overcome an acute energy crisis, slightly rose to 28,000 bpd, from 22,000 bpd in September.

Venezuela also saw an increase in fuel imports to 81,000 bpd, from 67,000 bpd the previous month, according to the data.

(Reporting by Marianna Parraga in Houston and Mircely Guanipa in Maracay, Venezuela; Editing by Marguerita Choy)