Chloe Rouveyrolles-Bazire
Sun 3 November 2024
The UNRWA office in Nur Shams was almost totally destroyed in the Israeli raid (JAAFAR ASHTIYEH) (JAAFAR ASHTIYEH/AFP/AFP)
Residents of Nur Shams camp in the occupied West Bank are fearful for their future after an Israeli raid this week damaged the UN agency for Palestinian refugees office there.
The 13,000 inhabitants of the camp near the northern city of Tulkarem depend heavily on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees.
UNRWA notably runs two schools, a clinic and sanitation services in Nur Shams.
Stunned refugees watched as workers cleared rubble from around the office, which was almost totally destroyed in an "anti-terrorist" operation on Thursday.
"For us, it's UNRWA or nothing," Shafiq Ahmad Jad, who runs a phone shop in the camp, told AFP.
"For the refugees... they look to UNRWA as their mother," said Hanadi Jabr Abu Taqa, an agency official in charge of the northern West Bank.
"So imagine if they lost their mother."
UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini blamed the destruction on Israeli forces, saying they had "severely damaged" the office.
But the military firmly denied the accusations, telling AFP that the damage was "likely" caused by explosives planted by "terrorists".
The office will have to be relocated, "a significant investment" according to Roland Friedrich, the agency's head in the West Bank.
"The psychological impact, of course, is devastating," he added after speaking to residents on Saturday.
- 'Attack on right of return' -
From his phone shop whose facade was torn off, Jad watched as excavators removed rubble and technicians repaired communications cabling.
He said he believed the chaos was linked to the Israeli parliament's adoption late last month of a law banning "UNRWA's activities on Israeli territory".
Were the agency to disappear even from the Palestinian territories like Tulkarem, he said the streets would fill with even more rubbish and sick people would go without care.
"To want to eliminate it is to want to eliminate the Palestinian question," Jad said.
Fellow camp resident Mohammed Said Amar, in his 70s, said Israel was attacking UNRWA "for political ends, to abolish the right of return".
He was referring to the principle that Palestinians who fled the land or were expelled when Israel was created in 1948 have the right to return, as do their descendants.
He insisted that Palestinian armed groups did not use the UNRWA premises, which locals consider "sacred".
If the army destroyed the building, as he believed, this meant it always wanted to target it.
Nihaya al-Jundi fumed that daily life was paralysed after every raid and that impassable roads left residents isolated.
Nur Shams needs international organisations like UNRWA to rebuild, said Jundi, whose centre for the disabled was damaged and where the wheelchair ramp collapsed.
The camp, established in the early 1950s, was long a fairly quiet, tight-knit community.
But in recent years, armed movements have taken root there against a backdrop of violence between Palestinians and Israelis, economic insecurity and no political horizons.
- 'They worry' -
Two days after the Israeli operation, the internet was still not repaired and some main roads remained an obstacle course.
UNRWA's operations have resumed, however.
"The first thing we do is that we make sure that we announce that the schools are open," said the agency's Jabr Abu Taqa.
"We know how important it is for us to bring the children to what they consider a safe haven," she added.
As she strolled through the camp, many anxious residents approached her.
One young man pointed to a ransacked barber's shop and asked: "What did he do to deserve this, the barber? He no longer has work, money. What will he do?"
Mustafa Shibah, 70, worried about his grandchildren. He turned his radio's volume all the way up during the raids -- but the little ones were not fooled.
"My granddaughter wakes up (from the raids) and bursts into tears," he said.
"They worry, they have trouble getting to school because of the (damaged) road."
For him, the threats to UNRWA are just the latest example of the suffering of Nur Shams residents who feel abandoned by Palestinians elsewhere.
"Why is it only us that have to pay while they dance in Ramallah and have a good life in Hebron?" he asked.
He said Israel "feels they can do anything" with no one to stop them.
crb/cyj-amj/jd/srm
Israel’s ban on Unrwa will annihilate healthcare for Palestinians
The Guardian
Fri 1 November 2024
A Palestinian man surrounded by children cooks at a Unwra school used as shelter in Gaza City on 27 November 2023.Photograph: Omar El-Qattaa/AFP/Getty
Two bills passed in the Israeli Knesset on Monday ban the UN relief and works agency (Unrwa) from operating in Israeli territory and prohibit Israeli authorities from any contact with the agency (Israeli parliament votes to ban Unrwa from Israel within 90 days, 28 October). The legislation will stop all Unrwa’s operations in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, where it provides education and health services to hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. It will also severely restrict Unrwa activities in the Gaza Strip, where the agency depends on coordination with Israel to provide humanitarian aid.
This legislation blitz comes on top of an existing health crisis in the West Bank, related to the Palestinian Authority’s fiscal crisis with Israel’s withholding of tax revenues, to the suspension of 40%-50% of travel permits for medical care within Israel since 7 October 2023, and also related to the decrease in Israel-provided healthcare in the West Bank.
As Israeli physicians who have long treated Palestinian patients in Israel and in volunteer-run clinics in the West Bank and East Jerusalem – with the aid of humanitarian organisations such as Unrwa – and who can no longer contact the organisation or get medications or medical supplies for our patients, we feel it is necessary we speak out against this blatant injustice.
Importantly, numerous Israeli physicians and medical personnel have recently co-signed a support letter for the American medical professionals who are against the ongoing health crisis in Gaza, and sent it directly to the White House, urging Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to stop the disaster in Gaza.
The Israeli legislation scheme against Unrwa is going to annihilate healthcare in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, on top of the unbearable catastrophe in the Gaza Strip.
Michal Feldon Paediatric rheumatologist, Daphna Shochat Endocrinologist
Tel Aviv, Israel
‘There is no alternative’: Israel’s ban on vital Unrwa services will be a catastrophe for Gaza
Bethan McKernan in Ramallah and Julian Borger in Jerusalem
Sat 2 November 2024
The Guardian
Bags of flour being distributed by Unrwa staff to Palestinians in Khan Younis in Gaza.Photograph: Haitham Imad/EPA
Bin bags were piling up at one end of the chaotic main thoroughfare in Shuafat refugee camp on Friday morning as shoppers walked by, stepping over a stream of wastewater trickling from a nearby drainpipe. Poor sanitation is just one of the UN-administered Palestinian camp’s problems – but things will get much worse.
Despite huge international pressure not to jeopardise the work of Unrwa, the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, the Israeli parliament voted this week to ban the organisation from operating on its soil. It also declared it a terror group, in effect severing all cooperation and communication between the UN agency and the Jewish state.
At present it is unclear how the new laws, which are supposed to come into effect in 90 days, will affect aid in Gaza, where UN officials say humanitarian efforts for 2.3 million people are “completely dependent” on Unrwa staff, facilities and logistical capabilities. Another 900,000 Palestinians in the West Bank rely on the organisation for basic services, which the semi-autonomous Palestinian Authority does not have the capacity to take over, leading to fears it could collapse altogether.
“I have studied Unrwa for many years; I can emphatically say there is no alternative. It is not like other UN agencies in terms of the scope and scale of what the international community and Israel has asked it to provide while there is no solution to the conflict,” said Dr Maya Rosenfeld, a sociologist and anthropologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“Emergency providers can step in for a short time, but they cannot replace what Unrwa does long-term. It is too big to fail,” she added.
The new bills could yet be vetoed by the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, if he can be persuaded to by western allies who support Unrwa’s activities. The legislation will also be challenged in petitions made by human rights groups to Israel’s supreme court.
At stake are 96 schools in the West Bank serving 45,000 students, as well as 43 health centres, food distribution services for refugee families, and psychological support services, according to the agency’s website. Before the war in Gaza, Unrwa operated 278 schools for 290,000 students, ran 22 medical centres, and distributed food packages to 1.1 million people. It now serves as a crucial emergency lifeline.
The anti-Unrwa legislation, passed by a 92-10 vote in the Knesset late on Monday evening, marks an all-time low in Israel’s relationship with the UN, which it has long accused of bias.
Decades of friction came to a head in the aftermath of Hamas’s 7 October attack last year, in which Israel alleged 12 Unrwa employees took part. The agency fired several staff members as a result of an independent inquiry but says that Israel’s wider accusations that as many as 10% of its 13,000 staff in Gaza support the Palestinian militant group are unfounded.
If the ban is operationalised, Israel would stop issuing entry and work permits to foreign Unrwa staff, and would end coordination with the Israeli military to permit aid shipments into Gaza, in effect blocking aid delivery into the beleaguered territory.
“Hundreds of thousands of people will slip from acute food insecurity into mass starvation,” said Chris Gunness, who was an Unrwa spokesperson from 2007 to 2020.
In besieged northern Gaza, where Israel last month renewed a ferocious aerial and ground offensive critics say is designed to force the estimated 400,000 remaining people to leave for the relative safety of the south, conditions are already the worst of the war to date. On Friday, the heads of UN agencies described the situation as “apocalyptic”. Banning Unrwa would mean the humanitarian response everywhere else in the strip would also fail, Gunness added.
“There will be no one to receive them, put shelter over their heads, provide food, water, medicine and sanitation products for women and girls. In the longer term, the children Unrwa educates in Gaza – already deep in trauma after the most brutal civilian bombardment since the second world war – will become a lost generation … This will seriously undermine the prospects of peace in the Middle East for many years,” he said.
Israel has said it will work with international partners – who have heavily criticised the anti-Unrwa move – to “facilitate humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza in a way that does not threaten Israel’s security”, but is yet to propose an alternative aid structure.
In Jerusalem, if the ban went ahead, Unrwa would have to shutter its headquarters in the half of the city annexed by Israel, effectively ending its presence there. In Shuafat, the only one of 27 refugee camps across the Palestinian territories on the annexed Jerusalem side of Israel’s West Bank separation wall, 16,500 people would immediately be cut off from health and education services.
“You see how things are here,” said Samer al-Qam, 47, gesturing around Shuafat’s chaotic main street. “Unrwa runs the camp’s schools, and the health clinic. It’s a major employer. Are the Israelis going to come and do it? This is not just about Unrwa … I think it’s about getting rid of Palestinians completely.”
Aida Saleh, 67, said: “I am diabetic and I need the Unrwa clinic for my insulin. Yes, it would be better if we didn’t have to rely on it, but if Israel will not give us rights there is no other choice.”
Unrwa’s mandate is to provide life-giving services to anyone who has “lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict”, a mission widened after the 1967 war, when the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories began. The agency is also charged with caring for descendants of refugees; the population it serves now numbers more than 5.6 million across Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.
From an initial focus on relief, as the decades passed Unrwa channelled its resources into education, healthcare and social services. The total regional budget in 2023 was about $1.6bn, funded almost entirely by voluntary national contributions, with the biggest donor being the US ($422m).
Dependence on the US and the voluntary nature of the funding has made Unrwa vulnerable in the past. The Trump administration cut funding in 2018, claiming other countries were not paying enough and that the agency was “a hurdle to peace”. Much of the funding gap was made up by other countries until the Biden administration ordered it resumed in 2021.
Several western donors suspended funding for the agency after the 7 October allegations, although all but one – the US – have now restored financial support.
In Israel, the wisdom of the ban has been questioned, given the Biden administration’s latest insistence that Israel take immediate action to let more humanitarian aid into Gaza. Potential punishments could include a halt to US weapons transfers.
The measure is “populist” and “political”, according to Shira Efron, a senior director at the Israeli Policy Forum thinktank, speaking to the Times of Israel.
“The country is fighting in Gaza, fighting in Lebanon; it’s finished round two in Iran, which could develop into round three; there are threats from Iraq, Syria, and Yemen; Israel is trying to keep a lid on the West Bank,” she said. “To have this legislation now misses the strategic point.”
Bags of flour being distributed by Unrwa staff to Palestinians in Khan Younis in Gaza.Photograph: Haitham Imad/EPA
Bin bags were piling up at one end of the chaotic main thoroughfare in Shuafat refugee camp on Friday morning as shoppers walked by, stepping over a stream of wastewater trickling from a nearby drainpipe. Poor sanitation is just one of the UN-administered Palestinian camp’s problems – but things will get much worse.
Despite huge international pressure not to jeopardise the work of Unrwa, the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, the Israeli parliament voted this week to ban the organisation from operating on its soil. It also declared it a terror group, in effect severing all cooperation and communication between the UN agency and the Jewish state.
At present it is unclear how the new laws, which are supposed to come into effect in 90 days, will affect aid in Gaza, where UN officials say humanitarian efforts for 2.3 million people are “completely dependent” on Unrwa staff, facilities and logistical capabilities. Another 900,000 Palestinians in the West Bank rely on the organisation for basic services, which the semi-autonomous Palestinian Authority does not have the capacity to take over, leading to fears it could collapse altogether.
“I have studied Unrwa for many years; I can emphatically say there is no alternative. It is not like other UN agencies in terms of the scope and scale of what the international community and Israel has asked it to provide while there is no solution to the conflict,” said Dr Maya Rosenfeld, a sociologist and anthropologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“Emergency providers can step in for a short time, but they cannot replace what Unrwa does long-term. It is too big to fail,” she added.
The new bills could yet be vetoed by the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, if he can be persuaded to by western allies who support Unrwa’s activities. The legislation will also be challenged in petitions made by human rights groups to Israel’s supreme court.
At stake are 96 schools in the West Bank serving 45,000 students, as well as 43 health centres, food distribution services for refugee families, and psychological support services, according to the agency’s website. Before the war in Gaza, Unrwa operated 278 schools for 290,000 students, ran 22 medical centres, and distributed food packages to 1.1 million people. It now serves as a crucial emergency lifeline.
The anti-Unrwa legislation, passed by a 92-10 vote in the Knesset late on Monday evening, marks an all-time low in Israel’s relationship with the UN, which it has long accused of bias.
Decades of friction came to a head in the aftermath of Hamas’s 7 October attack last year, in which Israel alleged 12 Unrwa employees took part. The agency fired several staff members as a result of an independent inquiry but says that Israel’s wider accusations that as many as 10% of its 13,000 staff in Gaza support the Palestinian militant group are unfounded.
If the ban is operationalised, Israel would stop issuing entry and work permits to foreign Unrwa staff, and would end coordination with the Israeli military to permit aid shipments into Gaza, in effect blocking aid delivery into the beleaguered territory.
“Hundreds of thousands of people will slip from acute food insecurity into mass starvation,” said Chris Gunness, who was an Unrwa spokesperson from 2007 to 2020.
In besieged northern Gaza, where Israel last month renewed a ferocious aerial and ground offensive critics say is designed to force the estimated 400,000 remaining people to leave for the relative safety of the south, conditions are already the worst of the war to date. On Friday, the heads of UN agencies described the situation as “apocalyptic”. Banning Unrwa would mean the humanitarian response everywhere else in the strip would also fail, Gunness added.
“There will be no one to receive them, put shelter over their heads, provide food, water, medicine and sanitation products for women and girls. In the longer term, the children Unrwa educates in Gaza – already deep in trauma after the most brutal civilian bombardment since the second world war – will become a lost generation … This will seriously undermine the prospects of peace in the Middle East for many years,” he said.
Israel has said it will work with international partners – who have heavily criticised the anti-Unrwa move – to “facilitate humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza in a way that does not threaten Israel’s security”, but is yet to propose an alternative aid structure.
In Jerusalem, if the ban went ahead, Unrwa would have to shutter its headquarters in the half of the city annexed by Israel, effectively ending its presence there. In Shuafat, the only one of 27 refugee camps across the Palestinian territories on the annexed Jerusalem side of Israel’s West Bank separation wall, 16,500 people would immediately be cut off from health and education services.
“You see how things are here,” said Samer al-Qam, 47, gesturing around Shuafat’s chaotic main street. “Unrwa runs the camp’s schools, and the health clinic. It’s a major employer. Are the Israelis going to come and do it? This is not just about Unrwa … I think it’s about getting rid of Palestinians completely.”
Aida Saleh, 67, said: “I am diabetic and I need the Unrwa clinic for my insulin. Yes, it would be better if we didn’t have to rely on it, but if Israel will not give us rights there is no other choice.”
Unrwa’s mandate is to provide life-giving services to anyone who has “lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict”, a mission widened after the 1967 war, when the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories began. The agency is also charged with caring for descendants of refugees; the population it serves now numbers more than 5.6 million across Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.
From an initial focus on relief, as the decades passed Unrwa channelled its resources into education, healthcare and social services. The total regional budget in 2023 was about $1.6bn, funded almost entirely by voluntary national contributions, with the biggest donor being the US ($422m).
Dependence on the US and the voluntary nature of the funding has made Unrwa vulnerable in the past. The Trump administration cut funding in 2018, claiming other countries were not paying enough and that the agency was “a hurdle to peace”. Much of the funding gap was made up by other countries until the Biden administration ordered it resumed in 2021.
Several western donors suspended funding for the agency after the 7 October allegations, although all but one – the US – have now restored financial support.
In Israel, the wisdom of the ban has been questioned, given the Biden administration’s latest insistence that Israel take immediate action to let more humanitarian aid into Gaza. Potential punishments could include a halt to US weapons transfers.
The measure is “populist” and “political”, according to Shira Efron, a senior director at the Israeli Policy Forum thinktank, speaking to the Times of Israel.
“The country is fighting in Gaza, fighting in Lebanon; it’s finished round two in Iran, which could develop into round three; there are threats from Iraq, Syria, and Yemen; Israel is trying to keep a lid on the West Bank,” she said. “To have this legislation now misses the strategic point.”
