Sunday, November 03, 2024

Moldova pro-EU leader Sandu wins re-election despite Russian meddling allegations

NEWS WIRES
Sun 3 November 2024 

Moldova's incumbent President and presidential candidate (C) celebrates with staff and supporters following preliminary results of the second round of the presidential election, in Chisinau November 3, 2024.

Moldova's pro-Western President Maia Sandu has secured a second term, defeating a Russia-aligned rival amid allegations of Russian interference, voter fraud, and intimidation. The win bolsters the pro-Western government’s EU integration agenda.

Moldova's pro-EU incumbent Maia Sandu on Sunday won a tense presidential runoff, beating her rival backed by a pro-Russian party in what she described as a "lesson in democracy".

The election in the ex-Soviet republic that lies sandwiched between war-torn Ukraine and the European Union has been overshadowed by allegations of meddling by Moscow.


The key vote took place just two weeks after a referendum backed joining the EU by a razor-thin margin.

Sandu stood at 54.94 percent of the vote against 45.06 percent for Alexandr Stoianoglo, who is supported by the pro-Russian Socialists and whom Sandu fired as prosecutor general last year, according to near-complete results published by the election commission.

"Today, dear Moldovans, you have given a lesson in democracy, worthy of being written in history books.... Freedom, truth, and justice have prevailed," Sandu declared.
'Honest vote'

Earlier, the 52-year-old former World Bank economist thanked jubilant supporters for "their honest vote".

Her rival Stoianoglo, 57, urged people "to remain calm, regardless of the figures".

Moldovan authorities reported "attacks, provocations and attempts at destabilisation" on Sunday.

Pro-EU incumbent Maia Sandu re-elected to second term as president of Moldova

Euronews
Sun 3 November 2024 

Pro-EU incumbent Maia Sandu re-elected to second term as president of Moldova

Moldova's pro-Western incumbent president Maia Sandu has won a second term in a pivotal presidential runoff against a Russia-friendly opponent, in a race overshadowed by claims of Russian interference, voter fraud and intimidation.

With almost 99% of votes counted in the second round, Sandu had 55.03% of the vote, according to the Central Electoral Commission.

Her competitor, the former prosecutor general Alexandr Stoianoglo, was polling at just under 45%.

Speaking at the headquarters of her Action and Solidarity party in the capital Chișinău, Sandu struck a conciliatory tone and said she had listened to those who had voted both for and against her, adding that her priority in the coming years would be to be a president for all Moldovans.

But she went on to claim that her country's vote had faced an "unprecedented attack" through alleged schemes including dirty money, vote-buying and electoral interference "by hostile forces from outside the country."

"You have shown that nothing can stand in the way of the people's power when they choose to speak through their vote," she said.

When polls closed locally at 9pm local time, turnout stood at more than 1.68 million people, around 54% of eligible voters, according to the Central Election Commission.

Moldova's large diaspora, which cast ballots in record numbers of more than 325,000, voted heavily in favour of Sandu.

In the first round, which was held on 20 October, Sandu took 42% of the vote but failed to win an outright majority over second place Stoianoglo.

Moldova's presidential role carries significant powers in areas such as foreign policy and national security and has a four-year term.

Allegations of interference

On Sunday, Moldovan police said they had "reasonable evidence" of organised transportation of voters, illegal under the country's electoral code, to polling stations from within the country and from overseas and are "investigating and registering evidence in connection with air transport activities from Russia to Belarus, Azerbaijan and Turkey."

"Such measures are taken to protect the integrity of the electoral process and to ensure that every citizen’s vote is cast freely without undue pressure or influence," police said.

Moldova's foreign ministry said on Sunday afternoon that polling stations in Frankfurt, Germany, and Liverpool and Northampton in the UK had been targeted by false bomb threats, which "intended only to stop the voting process."


Maia Sandu's main competitor was former prosecutor general, Alexandr Stoianoglo, 3 November, 2024 - Vadim Ghirda/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved.

Stanislav Secrieru, the president's national security adviser, wrote on X: "We are seeing massive interference by Russia in our electoral process,” which he warned had a “high potential to distort the outcome" of the vote.

Secrieru later added that the national voter record systems were being targeted by "ongoing coordinated cyberattacks" to disrupt links between domestic polling stations and those abroad, and that cybersecurity teams were "working to counter these threats and ensure system continuity."

Moldova's Prime Minister Dorin Recean said that people throughout the country had received “anonymous death threats via phone calls” in what he called "an extreme attack" to scare voters in the former Soviet republic, which has a population of about 2.5 million people.

Vote-buying scheme

Moldovans voted twice on 20 October; first for the president and second in a referendum on whether to enshrine the aim of EU membership in the country’s constitution.

That passed with a razor-thin majority of 50.35%, given a boost in the final hours of ballot counting by overseas voters.

In the wake of those October votes, Moldovan law enforcement said that a vote-buying scheme was orchestrated by Ilan Shor, an exiled oligarch who lives in Russia and was convicted in absentia last year of fraud and money laundering.

Shor denies any wrongdoing.

Prosecutors allege that $39 million (€35 million) was paid to more than 130,000 recipients through an internationally sanctioned Russian bank to voters between September and October.

Anti-corruption authorities have conducted hundreds of searches and seized over $2.7 million (€2.5 million) in cash as they attempt to crack down.

In one case in Gagauzia, an autonomous part of Moldova where only 5% voted in favour of joining the EU, a physician was detained after allegedly coercing 25 residents of a home for older adults to vote for a candidate they did not choose.

Police said they obtained "conclusive evidence", including financial transfers from the same Russian bank.

Moldova's EU future

A pro-Western government has been in power in Moldova since 2021 and parliamentary elections are set to take place next year.

Moldova watchers warn that the 2025 vote could be Moscow's main target.



A man casts his ballot at a polling station in the capital Chișinău, 3 November, 2024 - Vadim Ghirda/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved.

In the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moldova applied to join the EU. It was granted candidate status in June of that year, and in summer 2024, Brussels agreed to start membership negotiations.

The sharp westward shift irked Moscow and significantly soured relations with Chișinău.

Since then, Moldovan authorities have repeatedly accused Russia of waging a vast "hybrid war", from sprawling disinformation campaigns to protests by pro-Russia parties to vote-buying schemes that undermine countrywide elections.

Russia has denied any meddling.

Resisting Russia, Moldova’s President Fights to Keep Power

Andra Timu, Lina Grau and Irina Vilcu
Sat 2 November 2024 



(Bloomberg) -- The several hundred people gathered inside a hall in the Moldovan village of Pirlita wore winter clothes to keep out the chill. Heating is a luxury the local mayor can’t afford, even when the president visits.

The scene was a sharp reminder of the economic backdrop for Maia Sandu, the country’s leader the past four years, as she seeks re-election in a runoff vote on Sunday that has geopolitical implications beyond the tiny nation.

Moldova is one of the poorest places in Europe, sandwiched between the relative riches of Romania and war-torn Ukraine. Sandu is determined to persuade her country the path toward European Union integration is the right one, but it’s also one Russia is keen to derail. A referendum two weeks ago on future membership unexpectedly saw Moldova split down the middle.

Sandu, 52, faces Alexandr Stoianoglo, 57, a former general prosecutor who favors closer ties with Moscow, with everything to play for. Sandu secured 42% of the vote in the first round held the same day as the EU referendum versus 26% for her opponent. The gap is expected to have significantly narrowed as Stoianoglo picks up ballots from other pro-Russian candidates.

While Sandu has enjoyed the support of EU leaders passing through the country in recent months, her opponent has benefited from what Western governments have called a disinformation campaign led by pro-Russian politicians. Moldovan authorities also accused Russia of bribing voters, which Moscow denies.

The vote comes a week after Georgia, another former Soviet state with ambitions for Western integration, backed a Kremlin-friendly leader in an election disputed by international observers and some European leaders. Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Moldova could be next.

“The fact that the referendum passed is essential for Moldova’s future, but looking at what happened in Georgia we’re in a totally different paradigm,” said Iulian Chifu, chairman of the Bucharest-based Center for Conflict Prevention and Early Warning. “Maia Sandu seems to have understood that and took some good steps, but she still needs to secure more votes.”

Sandu is counting on the villages where she placed second and third in the first round of voting. In the cold hall in Pirlita, she was mobbed by people with bouquets of yellow chrysanthemums, a ubiquitous flower in autumn and the color of her Action and Solidarity Party.

Also hailing from a village, Sandu pointed to the importance of European money in building new roads, schools and sewage systems. If a pro-Russian candidate wins the presidency, she said, this support will stop.

She told the elderly audience that for young people to return to the country — one of the most quickly depopulating in the world — Moldova needs to grow its economy and that’s only possible with the support of the West. She acknowledged mistakes, asking them to give her more time to push through much-needed reforms, especially in the judiciary.

“I know that we have many problems, but we should not set fire to the country because we got angry,” said Sandu.

But the scale of her challenge was also evident. Many locals say they still don’t feel the positive impacts of European funds. They’re concerned about rising prices, scarce jobs and basics like a lack of drinking water. The pro-Russia message is that the EU is to blame.

Some villagers asked whether Christian Orthodox church celebrations would be banned if Moldova joins the EU. They said they read on social media platform Telegram that the EU will take away their land, bring war, and even forbid keeping chickens in backyards. They applauded when Sandu reassured them.

(Sign up to our Eastern Europe Edition newsletter, delivered every Friday.)

One younger man in the audience, Anatol, said he was waiting for the result of the election to decide whether or not to stay in Moldova. He said incomes are low and prices are high and the country needs the prospect of EU integration or there’s no point in staying.

“We don’t want us young people to have to leave,” he said. “But for that, you in government should have done more, and those who contributed to corrupting the votes should go on trial.”

Sandu’s struggle was most apparent during a debate with her opponent on Oct. 27. While she stressed her stance against Russia, Stoianoglo advocated “good ties with all partners — the EU, the US, Russia and China” and stopped short of condemning Moscow’s aggression against Ukraine.

While Sandu branded him as Moscow’s “Trojan horse,” Stoianoglo has struck a more cautious tone than previous pro-Russian politicians in Moldova. He said he wasn’t against EU integration but dismissed the referendum as a move by Sandu to boost her support. He accused her of incompetence, mismanaging the economy and leading the country into deeper divides.

QuickTake: Why Russia and the West Are Sparring Over Moldova

How Sandu arrived at this critical juncture goes back a decade to when she was serving as Moldova’s minister of education. A Harvard-educated economist, Sandu had left the World Bank in Washington to take up the role.

Her reforms merging small schools in depopulating villages were so unpopular that colleagues openly betted on how long she would last, she said. But another event that put Moldova on the map turned out to be more of a defining moment.

In 2014, $1 billion was siphoned out of three state-owned banks, costing Moldova the equivalent of 12% of its gross domestic product. The crisis turned her into a prominent pro-European figure opposed to the oligarchs that controlled swathes of the economy.

Two years later, she narrowly lost to pro-Russian President Igor Dodon, whose campaign derided her as an unmarried woman, before beating him in 2020 by promising to tackle corruption. Stoianoglo is the candidate backed by Dodon’s party this time around.

Sandu’s four years in power have been turbulent as Russia’s war next door in Ukraine escalated the tension within Moldova while whacking the already fragile economy. Gross domestic product per capita is still less than half that of Bulgaria, the EU’s poorest member.

If she retains power, it will be a prelude to another fight between pro-Western and pro-Russian political forces next year when the country holds parliamentary elections. The Russia-based Pravda newspaper called the presidential vote simply a “rehearsal for the main political battle.”

Yet Sandu is popular among Moldova’s large diaspora, which bolstered her support in the first round and ensured the EU referendum on enshrining membership in the constitution ended up passing by a whisker, 50.4%. Those people may again swing the vote on Sunday.

Winning over voters at home remains the key challenge, especially given their disillusionment with the country’s future and their susceptibility to disinformation. Polls had shown support for the EU at 60% before the vote.

One story Sandu uses is how her mother confronted two women on a trolleybus in the capital, Chisinau, who claimed the president had sent her to the US.

“The stakes are much higher now because the first round of the presidential elections and the referendum showed that fighting Russian disinformation isn’t easy,” said Chifu, who expects her to win. “If before, everyone was expecting a landslide victory from her part and to crush any opponent, now we’ll probably see a much tighter result.”

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
Gig economy firm under fire for telling restaurants they can avoid UK’s new tipping laws

A tip plate at a restaurant.Photograph: Alicia Canter/The Observer

Tom Wall
Sun 3 November 2024

A gig economy firm has been criticised for telling its hospitality clients they can avoid new fair tipping laws and a forthcoming ban on zero-hours contractors by using its freelance workforce.

Temper Works, which supplies workers to more than 5,000 companies, including Hard Rock Cafe, Alexandra Palace and Claridge’s, is promoting its workforce to restaurants, hotels and bars on the basis that “they are not covered by the provisions of the new [tipping] legislation”.


The Netherlands-based firm, which opened an office in the UK in 2022, warns companies that agency workers “must now be included in tip-sharing schemes” but claims gig economy workers sourced through its website fall outside the legislation. “By engaging freelancers through Temper, businesses can continue to access flexible labour without the added costs and complexities associated with tip allocation for agency workers,” it states in a briefing published last month.

Under the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act, which came into force last month, firms must share all tips between workers, including temporary agency staff. The legislation was prompted by a public outcry over high street chains deducting money intended for waiting and kitchen staff. The Observer revealed that Pizza Express was taking 8p of every £1 paid when tips were given by card in 2015. The policy was later scrapped by the chain.

The Unite union, which campaigned for the new tipping rules, said it was potentially unlawful to exclude gig workers from tips shares as the courts would probably find they were not genuinely self-employed. “For Temper Works to be so flagrantly advertising services which seek to flout new and well-established employment law to line their own pockets isn’t just morally reprehensible, it is almost certainly illegal,” said Bryan Simpson, Unite lead organiser in the hospitality sector. Temper Works is also advising firms to use its 60,000-strong pool of freelancers to get around a proposal to ban zero-hours contracts, which is a key plank in Labour’s new ­worker’s rights legislation. Under Labour’s the forthcoming employment rights bill, agency workers on zero-hours contracts will have the right after 12 weeks to a contract with guaranteed hours.

A document by Temper Works from August argues the changes “present significant challenges for businesses that have come to rely on the flexibility offered by zero-hour contracts”. It adds the requirement to offer stable contracts means “overall labour costs are likely to rise”. It says firms should instead “use independent contractors as [a] pool of temporary workers” which “allows businesses to benefit from a flexible workforce that can adapt to changing demands while ensuring that the business isn’t burdened with the obligations and restrictions associated with permanent employment contracts”. Another briefing on Temper’s website claims it can help firms “survive the national minimum wage increase” earlier in the year, which the chancellor announced last week would rise again to £12.21 in April 2025. Temper says shifts can be as long or as short as a business wants: “We frequently see shifts of just 60-90 minutes, to cover the lunchtime rush. You only need to pay for staffing precisely when required, and only for the actual time worked on shift.”

The UK government is planning to consult on bringing in a simpler two-tier employment framework, which distinguishes between genuine self-employment and all other types of workers. A Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said: “Employers shouldn’t try to circumvent the spirit or letter of the law through practices like bogus self-employment or not passing on tips. If they do, workers can take them to a tribunal where they may be made to pay significant compensation.”

Temper Works said it did not recognise the “strong claims” made by Unite. “Temper is a platform that has always operated, and will continue to operate, transparently and according to UK law,” it said in a statement. It said a Dutch court had found it was a platform for work, not an employment agency. It added that the functions built into the platform, including the ability to appoint substitutes to perform work, negotiate hourly rates and turn down work, ensured it was “a marketplace for independent contractors”. Temper said independent contractors sat outside of the tipping legislation but clients were free to “allocate tips to contractors on Temper if they wish to do so”. It added that contractors were given a range of protections,which are not typically offered to agency staff, including a minimum of £12 an hour and compensation for loss of earnings for up to 12 months. It said the average pay on the site was £14.09 an hour in September while shifts of 60-90 minutes were in reality “uncommon”.

It said the government’s zero-hours ban would do little to shift the balance of power towards employees whereas the independent contracting model “puts control back in the hands of the person working the shift” as they can choose their hours.

Thousands take to London streets demanding cleaner water

AFP
Sun 3 November 2024 


Protesters attend a "March for Clean Water" in London, calling for the government to "stop the poisoning of Britain's waters" (BENJAMIN CREMEL) (BENJAMIN CREMEL/AFP/AFP)


Thousands of people marched through central London on Sunday demanding action on cleaning up Britain's rivers and seas.

Environmental activist and singer Feargal Sharkey and Fast Show comedian Paul Whitehouse were among those joining The March for Clean Water, which was backed by groups including Greenpeace, the Wildlife Trusts and British Rowing.

"Who likes dirty rivers? Not I. Lots of people love to use the rivers, waterways, and they're under threat from agricultural pollution and from the water companies," said Whitehouse, star of hit UK show "Gone Fishing".


Protesters are demanding reviews of water regulator Ofwat and the Environment Agency along with stricter enforcement for water companies who break existing pollution rules.

River Action said that there were around 15,000 marchers, who were encouraged to wear blue and to bring a sample from a body of water close to their heart.

Many wore elaborate costumes, while others held signs reading "tides not turds", "cut the crap" and "water for life".

Jenny Linford, a 61-year-old food writer, told AFP that it was "disgusting what has happened to our waters since the water companies were privatised.

"It's absolutely obscene that Britain's rivers and lakes and seas are having more sewage pumped into them.

"We're here because we want to speak up for water... and just say to politicians 'please act'," she said, adding that the issue was a factor in the Conservative Party's defeat in the July election.

The new Labour government last month set out legislation that will give regulators powers to issue harsher penalties, including prison sentences, to polluting water companies and their executives.

Lewis Pugh, endurance swimmer and ocean advocate, told AFP the march was "an opportunity to tell government that we really do need them to sort out what's happening in our rivers.

"When you allow agricultural runoff to go into rivers, or industrial waste or plastic pollution to go into rivers, not only do you kill the river and everything in it, but it goes into our oceans and does exactly the same thing," he added.

Water UK, the industry's trade association, acknowledged that the current system "is not working".

"It is too complicated, too slow and is not delivering for people or the environment," said a spokesperson.

"We cannot delay upgrading and expanding vital infrastructure any longer and need Ofwat to reconsider its approach," it added.

Around 100 protesters turned out for a similar march in Northern Ireland capital Belfast.

Siobhan Keegan, who open swims in Northern Ireland's Lough Neagh, said that she had not been able to "dunk" in the lake for the past two summers due to bacterial build up.

"If we don't act now it'll be too late for future generations," she warned.


The March for Clean Water will see protesters rally in Parliament Square to call for more action to keep the UK's rivers and seas clean. (Image: PA)


Vaccination centre and aid official’s car bombarded in Gaza, says UN

Julian Borger in Jerusalem
THE GUARDIAN
Sun 3 November 2024 

The second round of a vaccination campaign to protect children from polio began this weekend in Gaza City.Photograph: Mahmoud Issa/SOPA Images/Rex/Shutterstock


A polio vaccination centre and the car of a UN aid official involved in this weekend’s vaccination campaign came under fire despite a promised “humanitarian pause” in Israeli bombardment, the UN has said.

Catherine Russell, the executive director of the UN child support and protection agency, Unicef, said: “At least three children were reportedly injured by another attack in the proximity of a vaccination clinic in Sheikh Radwan while a polio vaccination campaign was under way.”

She added that the personal car of a Unicef employee working on the polio vaccine campaign “came under fire by what we believe to be a quadcopter.


Related: ‘Death is everywhere’: fears grow that Israel plans to seize land in Gaza

“The car was damaged. Fortunately, the staff member was not injured. But she has been left deeply shaken,” Russell wrote. She added that in the previous 48-hour period, more than 50 children had reportedly been killed in the Jabaliya refugee camp, a focus of Israeli military operations over the past month.

“The attacks on Jabaliya, the vaccination clinic and the Unicef staff member are yet further examples of the grave consequences of the indiscriminate strikes on civilians in the Gaza Strip,” Russell said.

“Taken alongside the horrific level of child deaths in north Gaza from other attacks, these most recent events combine to write yet another dark chapter in one of the darkest periods of this terrible war.”

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) denied responsibility for the reported attack on Sheikh Radwan, which is in northern Gaza to the west of the Jabaliya camp.

“We are aware of a claim about the harm to Palestinian civilians at the Sheikh Radwan vaccination centre in the northern Gaza Strip. Contrary to what was claimed, a preliminary investigation reveals that there was no strike by IDF forces in the area at the time in question,” an IDF statement said.

The weekend’s inoculation campaign was intended to give more than 100,000 Palestinian children under the age of 10 a second dose of polio vaccine, made necessary by an outbreak of the virus reported in July. It had been postponed in late October because of Israeli bombardment.

This weekend, the IDF agreed to suspend its strikes to allow the vaccinations to go ahead in northern Gaza except in the besieged areas in the northern governorate: Beit Hanoun, Beit Lahiya and Jabaliya.

Approximately 15,000 children under 10 are estimated to be in the excluded area and therefore will not receive the inoculation, threatening the effectiveness of the vaccination campaign, which requires at least 90% of all children in every district to be vaccinated to be sure of stopping the spread of the polio virus.

The World Health Organization (WHO) said that 58,604 children had been vaccinated on Saturday, the first day of the campaign. The WHO director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, described the reported strike on the Sheikh Radwan clinic as “extremely concerning”, saying it had happened “while parents were bringing their children to the life-saving polio vaccination in an area where a humanitarian pause was agreed to allow vaccination to proceed”.

“A WHO team was at the site just before,” Ghebreyesus said on the X social media platform. “This attack, during humanitarian pause, jeopardises the sanctity of health protection for children and may deter parents from bringing their children for vaccination. These vital humanitarian-area-specific pauses must be absolutely respected.”

The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, visited Israel’s northern border with Lebanon on Sunday, where he said that Hezbollah must be pushed back beyond the Litani River, with or without a ceasefire deal in place, and that the Iran-backed group must be prevented from re-arming.

“With or without an agreement, the key to returning our (evacuated) residents in the north safely to their homes is to keep back Hezbollah beyond the Litani, to strike its every attempt to rearm, and to respond forcefully against all action against us,” Netanyahu said during a visit to the border. The river is roughly 30km (20 miles) inside Lebanon from the border with Israel.

The Israeli army said Hezbollah had fired about 60 rockets across the Lebanese border on Sunday, some aimed at the occupied Golan Heights, others at the western Galilee area.

The IDF said most of the projectiles were intercepted and those that got through Israeli defences fell in open areas, causing no casualties on this occasion. The IDF, meanwhile, issued evacuation warnings to Lebanese residents in some areas of the ancient city of Baalbek and said that buildings being used by Hezbollah militants would be targeted imminently.

The death toll from Israeli attacks on Lebanon has now climbed to 2,897 and the number of injured to 13,150 since October 2023, including 30 dead and 183 injured in the past 24 hours, the Lebanese health ministry said.


Over 50 children reportedly killed in Gaza as violence disrupts polio vaccination campaign

Euronews
Sun 3 November 2024 

In the past 48 hours, over 50 children have reportedly been killed in Jabalia, northern Gaza, according to UN children’s agency.

UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell said on Sunday that the strikes have targeted two residential buildings, sheltering hundreds of people in the last 2 days.

"This has already been a deadly weekend of attacks in North Gaza," Russell said in a statement.

Palestinian officials have also reported that an Israeli drone strike hit a clinic in the region, where children were receiving polio vaccinations, injuring six people, including four children.

The Israeli military denied responsibility.

The alleged strike occurred on Saturday in northern Gaza, an area that has been encircled by Israeli forces and largely isolated for the past year. Israel has intensified its offensive there in recent weeks that has killed hundreds of people and displaced tens of thousands.

Israeli forces have repeatedly raided hospitals in Gaza over the course of the war, claiming Hamas uses them for militant purposes, allegations denied by Palestinian health officials. Hamas fighters are also operating in the north, battling Israeli forces.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF, which are jointly carrying out the polio vaccination campaign, expressed concern over the reported strike.



"This attack, during humanitarian pause, jeopardises the sanctity of health protection for children and may deter parents from bringing their children for vaccination," the statement from WHO said.

“The reports of this attack are even more disturbing as the Sheikh Radwan Clinic is one of the health points where parents can get their children vaccinated,” said Rosalia Bollen, a spokesperson for UNICEF.

Israeli military spokesman Nadav Shoshani said that “contrary to the claims, an initial review determined that the (Israeli military) did not strike in the area at the specified time.”


Delayed polio vaccinations resume in Gaza, agencies say

Reuters Videos
Updated Sat 2 November 2024 

Scroll back up to restore default view.

STORY: :: Gaza City, Gaza

The third phase of a delayed polio vaccination campaign in Gaza resumed on Saturday after being derailed by Israeli bombardments, mass displacement and lack of access.

:: November 2, 2024

Families with young children queued for the vaccine at this clinic in Gaza City.

The vaccination campaign began on September 1 after the World Health Organization confirmed that a baby was partially paralyzed by the type 2 polio virus in August.

It was the first such case in the territory in 25 years.

The WHO and the U.N. children’s agency UNICEF said the area covered by the September agreement had been substantially reduced and would now only cover Gaza City.

The final phase of the campaign had aimed to reach an estimated 119,000 children under 10 years old in northern Gaza with a second dose of an oral polio vaccine.

Achieving this target is now unlikely due to constraints on access, according to a statement.

Jamil Ali, the head of the clinic, says the reduced campaign impacts its effectiveness in preventing the spread of the disease.

The Israeli army’s Palestinian civil affairs agency, COGAT, said it was helping to coordinate the three-day campaign. Once complete, it said there would be an assessment to decide whether to extend.
How a small number of America’s richest people are funding both campaigns — and giving Trump more cash

Graig Graziosi
Sun 3 November 2024 
THE INDEPENDENT

Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris both have the backing of billionaires, and some have given huge sums to see their preferred candidate take the White House in 2024 (AP)


Billionaires have turned the money hose on full blast in the weeks leading up to the 2024 US presidential election, dropping hundreds of millions into their preferred candidates’ campaigns.

Kamala Harris has got more of the country’s billionaires backing, with 83 of them supporting Harris compared to 52 billionaires donating to Donald Trump, according to a breakdown by Forbes.

However, while Harris has a wider range of rich donors, Trump’s cash-flush pals have overall given more, with 18 of the top 25 individual donors giving exclusively or mostly to Republicans, according to an Open Secrets analysis.


Around 18 per cent of the money donated in this election, nearly $700m, came from billionaires, the Financial Times found.

The US ostensibly limits how much an individual can contribute to a candidate — $3,300 under current law —but Super PACs that support the candidates have no such limits, allowing the wealthiest Americans to out-influence most other voters by staggering margins.

While the rest of us are dodging texts from campaigns asking for "just five dollars" or skipping YouTube ads the moment we see a candidate's face, the parties court the wallets of the wealthy with high-profile donor dinners and star-studded events.

So how much money have the candidates pulled in with the help of their billionaire supporters? Here's a breakdown of some of the donors dropping big money this year.
Elon Musk

Tesla CEO Elon Musk (R) jumps on stage as he joins former US President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump during a campaign rally at site of his first assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania on October 5, 2024 (AFP via Getty Images)

Tesla and X CEO Elon Musk, the world's richest man, is very obviously in Trump's camp this election. Not only has he spoken at two of Trump's rallies — calling himself "dark, gothic MAGA" at a rally in New York City — but the former president has said he'd let him lead the charge on gutting the federal government if he's elected.

Musk gave nearly $75 million to a pro-Trump super PAC — America PAC — that he helped form in the summer, CNN reports.

Federal filings show that Musk has given at least $132 million to help Trump and conservatives in Congressional races this year.

He has become one of the most prolific donors of the 2024 election cycle.
Miriam Adelson

Donald Trump embraces Miriam Adelson at an event marking one year since the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel (AP)

Miriam Adelson is another prolific conservative donor and billionaire who is backing Trump in 2024. Adelson is the heir to a casino fortune and the wife of the late Sheldon Adelson, himself a megadonor to conservative causes.

In 2019 and 2020, the Adelsons contributed $218 million in federal donations to conservative causes, including groups aiming to get Trump re-elected.

Miriam revived the Preserve America super PAC this campaign, and gave $95 million to try and get Trump back in the White House, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

Between her, Musk, and Richard Uihlein — a packaging magnate — the trio donated approximately $220 million to Trump in a three-month period, CNN reports.

Bill Gates


Bill Gates has lent his support to the Harris campaign (AP)

Microsoft founder Bill Gates has also tossed his money bags into the 2024 election, though his donor dollars don’t quite counter the likes of Musk and Adelson.

Gates reportedly donated $50 million to help Harris's campaign according to the New York Times, though his donation may be more of an anti-Trump donation than a pro-Harris give; he stopped short of endorsing the former prosecutor for the nation's top job.

Sources close to Gates reportedly told the Times that he described the 2024 election as "different." The said that the donation was "meant to stay under wraps."

Gates reportedly made the donation to Future Forward, the main outside fundraising group supporting Harris.

Michael Bloomberg


Former Mayor of New York City Michael Bloomberg announced his endorsement with just days to go (REUTERS)

Former New York Mayor and one-time presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg has reportedly matched Bill Gates' donation after the Microsoft founder allegedly pressured him to up the ante and support Harris, according to the New York Times.

Gates also managed to wrangle venture capitalist Ron Conway and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman into donating to Harris. Conway gave at least $600,000, while Hoffman has put down more than $11.6 million to back Harris.

Bloomberg is said to have met with Harris's economic team to provide feedback on her plans, should she win in November. Following reports of the financial support, Bloomberg released a statement officially endorsing Harris.

The former New York mayor has backed Democratic presidential candidates since 2012. Earlier this year he donated nearly $20 million to back Joe Biden, who ultimately dropped out of the race in July.

Like Gates, Bloomberg also donated to Future Forward.


George and Alex Soros


Financier and philanthropist George Soros is another Harris backer (Getty Images)

Perhaps no one makes conservative conspiracy theorists — and Musk, if a distinction between the two is necessary — shiver more than George Soros, a Hungarian man born in the 1930s and who narrowly escaped the Nazis. He emigrated to the US in 1956 and has become a major contributor to Democratic candidates in the years since.

When Biden handed the campaign over to Harris in July, Soros and his son, Andrew, who now runs the Soros $25 billion charitable foundation, rallied behind her.

“It’s time for us all to unite around Kamala Harris and beat Donald Trump. She is the best and most qualified candidate we have,” Alex wrote in July.

In January, Soros's Fund for Policy Reform gave $60 million to Future Forward.

Timothy Mellon


A billboard launched by the Democratic National Committee highlights how Robert F Kennedy's Super PAC was allegedly receiving millions from Trump's then largest donor, Timothy Mellon on February 9, 2024 in Grand Rapids, Michigan (Getty/DNC)

Old money octogenarian Timothy Mellon isn't technically a billionaire, he's just close to being one. He's the heir to the Mellon family fortune — his great-grandfather was Thomas Mellon, the founder of Mellon Bank, whose name is still prominent all over Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Mellon tends to stay out of the spotlight, but has made his support of Trump very clear in his donations. He's given Trump affiliated groups $76.5 million this election cycle, including a $50 million gift the day after Trump was convicted of a felony, according to Forbes.

He also donated $25 million to support Robert F Kennedy Jr when he was still running.


Linda McMahon


Trump with former Small Business Administration director Linda McMahon (Getty Images)

Trump's former Small Business Administration head Linda McMahon shelled out $16 million to back her old boss this election cycle.

McMahon — who is worth approximately $3.1 billion according to Forbes — is the wife of Vince McMahon, the man who built World Wrestling Entertainment, and who has since been the subject of deplorable sexual misconduct allegations by a former employee.

Wrestling fans in the 2000s likely first encountered Linda playing the role of comatose wife to her husband's ostensibly fictional "Mr McMahon" character on WWE programming, though she was less present on television than her husband, daughter and son.

Vince has been close to Trump for decades; during a 2007 WWE storyline, "The Battle of the Billionaires," a fighter backed by Trump beat a fighter backed by Vince, which resulted in Trump tackling and shaving Vince's head live on Pay-Per-View.

With wrestling behind her, Linda now chairs the pro-Trump nonprofit America First Policy Institute, and serves on the board of Trump Media and Technology Group.

West Bank refugee camp gets foretaste of UNRWA's demise

Chloe Rouveyrolles-Bazire
Sun 3 November 2024 

The UNRWA office in Nur Shams was almost totally destroyed in the Israeli raid (JAAFAR ASHTIYEH) (JAAFAR ASHTIYEH/AFP/AFP)

Residents of Nur Shams camp in the occupied West Bank are fearful for their future after an Israeli raid this week damaged the UN agency for Palestinian refugees office there.

The 13,000 inhabitants of the camp near the northern city of Tulkarem depend heavily on the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees.

UNRWA notably runs two schools, a clinic and sanitation services in Nur Shams.


Stunned refugees watched as workers cleared rubble from around the office, which was almost totally destroyed in an "anti-terrorist" operation on Thursday.

"For us, it's UNRWA or nothing," Shafiq Ahmad Jad, who runs a phone shop in the camp, told AFP.

"For the refugees... they look to UNRWA as their mother," said Hanadi Jabr Abu Taqa, an agency official in charge of the northern West Bank.

"So imagine if they lost their mother."

UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini blamed the destruction on Israeli forces, saying they had "severely damaged" the office.

But the military firmly denied the accusations, telling AFP that the damage was "likely" caused by explosives planted by "terrorists".

The office will have to be relocated, "a significant investment" according to Roland Friedrich, the agency's head in the West Bank.

"The psychological impact, of course, is devastating," he added after speaking to residents on Saturday.

- 'Attack on right of return' -

From his phone shop whose facade was torn off, Jad watched as excavators removed rubble and technicians repaired communications cabling.

He said he believed the chaos was linked to the Israeli parliament's adoption late last month of a law banning "UNRWA's activities on Israeli territory".

Were the agency to disappear even from the Palestinian territories like Tulkarem, he said the streets would fill with even more rubbish and sick people would go without care.

"To want to eliminate it is to want to eliminate the Palestinian question," Jad said.

Fellow camp resident Mohammed Said Amar, in his 70s, said Israel was attacking UNRWA "for political ends, to abolish the right of return".

He was referring to the principle that Palestinians who fled the land or were expelled when Israel was created in 1948 have the right to return, as do their descendants.

He insisted that Palestinian armed groups did not use the UNRWA premises, which locals consider "sacred".

If the army destroyed the building, as he believed, this meant it always wanted to target it.

Nihaya al-Jundi fumed that daily life was paralysed after every raid and that impassable roads left residents isolated.

Nur Shams needs international organisations like UNRWA to rebuild, said Jundi, whose centre for the disabled was damaged and where the wheelchair ramp collapsed.

The camp, established in the early 1950s, was long a fairly quiet, tight-knit community.

But in recent years, armed movements have taken root there against a backdrop of violence between Palestinians and Israelis, economic insecurity and no political horizons.

- 'They worry' -

Two days after the Israeli operation, the internet was still not repaired and some main roads remained an obstacle course.

UNRWA's operations have resumed, however.

"The first thing we do is that we make sure that we announce that the schools are open," said the agency's Jabr Abu Taqa.

"We know how important it is for us to bring the children to what they consider a safe haven," she added.

As she strolled through the camp, many anxious residents approached her.

One young man pointed to a ransacked barber's shop and asked: "What did he do to deserve this, the barber? He no longer has work, money. What will he do?"

Mustafa Shibah, 70, worried about his grandchildren. He turned his radio's volume all the way up during the raids -- but the little ones were not fooled.

"My granddaughter wakes up (from the raids) and bursts into tears," he said.

"They worry, they have trouble getting to school because of the (damaged) road."

For him, the threats to UNRWA are just the latest example of the suffering of Nur Shams residents who feel abandoned by Palestinians elsewhere.

"Why is it only us that have to pay while they dance in Ramallah and have a good life in Hebron?" he asked.

He said Israel "feels they can do anything" with no one to stop them.

crb/cyj-amj/jd/srm


Israel’s ban on Unrwa will annihilate healthcare for Palestinians

The Guardian
Fri 1 November 2024 


A Palestinian man surrounded by children cooks at a Unwra school used as shelter in Gaza City on 27 November 2023.Photograph: Omar El-Qattaa/AFP/Getty


Two bills passed in the Israeli Knesset on Monday ban the UN relief and works agency (Unrwa) from operating in Israeli territory and prohibit Israeli authorities from any contact with the agency (Israeli parliament votes to ban Unrwa from Israel within 90 days, 28 October). The legislation will stop all Unrwa’s operations in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, where it provides education and health services to hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. It will also severely restrict Unrwa activities in the Gaza Strip, where the agency depends on coordination with Israel to provide humanitarian aid.

This legislation blitz comes on top of an existing health crisis in the West Bank, related to the Palestinian Authority’s fiscal crisis with Israel’s withholding of tax revenues, to the suspension of 40%-50% of travel permits for medical care within Israel since 7 October 2023, and also related to the decrease in Israel-provided healthcare in the West Bank.

As Israeli physicians who have long treated Palestinian patients in Israel and in volunteer-run clinics in the West Bank and East Jerusalem – with the aid of humanitarian organisations such as Unrwa – and who can no longer contact the organisation or get medications or medical supplies for our patients, we feel it is necessary we speak out against this blatant injustice.

Importantly, numerous Israeli physicians and medical personnel have recently co-signed a support letter for the American medical professionals who are against the ongoing health crisis in Gaza, and sent it directly to the White House, urging Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to stop the disaster in Gaza.

The Israeli legislation scheme against Unrwa is going to annihilate healthcare in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, on top of the unbearable catastrophe in the Gaza Strip.

Michal Feldon Paediatric rheumatologist, Daphna Shochat Endocrinologist
Tel Aviv, Israel


‘There is no alternative’: Israel’s ban on vital Unrwa services will be a catastrophe for Gaza

Bethan McKernan in Ramallah and Julian Borger in Jerusalem
Sat 2 November 2024 
The Guardian

Bags of flour being distributed by Unrwa staff to Palestinians in Khan Younis in Gaza.Photograph: Haitham Imad/EPA


Bin bags were piling up at one end of the chaotic main thoroughfare in Shuafat refugee camp on Friday morning as shoppers walked by, stepping over a stream of wastewater trickling from a nearby drainpipe. Poor sanitation is just one of the UN-administered Palestinian camp’s problems – but things will get much worse.

Despite huge international pressure not to jeopardise the work of Unrwa, the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, the Israeli parliament voted this week to ban the organisation from operating on its soil. It also declared it a terror group, in effect severing all cooperation and communication between the UN agency and the Jewish state.

At present it is unclear how the new laws, which are supposed to come into effect in 90 days, will affect aid in Gaza, where UN officials say humanitarian efforts for 2.3 million people are “completely dependent” on Unrwa staff, facilities and logistical capabilities. Another 900,000 Palestinians in the West Bank rely on the organisation for basic services, which the semi-autonomous Palestinian Authority does not have the capacity to take over, leading to fears it could collapse altogether.

“I have studied Unrwa for many years; I can emphatically say there is no alternative. It is not like other UN agencies in terms of the scope and scale of what the international community and Israel has asked it to provide while there is no solution to the conflict,” said Dr Maya Rosenfeld, a sociologist and anthropologist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

“Emergency providers can step in for a short time, but they cannot replace what Unrwa does long-term. It is too big to fail,” she added.

The new bills could yet be vetoed by the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, if he can be persuaded to by western allies who support Unrwa’s activities. The legislation will also be challenged in petitions made by human rights groups to Israel’s supreme court.

At stake are 96 schools in the West Bank serving 45,000 students, as well as 43 health centres, food distribution services for refugee families, and psychological support services, according to the agency’s website. Before the war in Gaza, Unrwa operated 278 schools for 290,000 students, ran 22 medical centres, and distributed food packages to 1.1 million people. It now serves as a crucial emergency lifeline.

The anti-Unrwa legislation, passed by a 92-10 vote in the Knesset late on Monday evening, marks an all-time low in Israel’s relationship with the UN, which it has long accused of bias.

Decades of friction came to a head in the aftermath of Hamas’s 7 October attack last year, in which Israel alleged 12 Unrwa employees took part. The agency fired several staff members as a result of an independent inquiry but says that Israel’s wider accusations that as many as 10% of its 13,000 staff in Gaza support the Palestinian militant group are unfounded.

If the ban is operationalised, Israel would stop issuing entry and work permits to foreign Unrwa staff, and would end coordination with the Israeli military to permit aid shipments into Gaza, in effect blocking aid delivery into the beleaguered territory.

“Hundreds of thousands of people will slip from acute food insecurity into mass starvation,” said Chris Gunness, who was an Unrwa spokesperson from 2007 to 2020.

In besieged northern Gaza, where Israel last month renewed a ferocious aerial and ground offensive critics say is designed to force the estimated 400,000 remaining people to leave for the relative safety of the south, conditions are already the worst of the war to date. On Friday, the heads of UN agencies described the situation as “apocalyptic”. Banning Unrwa would mean the humanitarian response everywhere else in the strip would also fail, Gunness added.

“There will be no one to receive them, put shelter over their heads, provide food, water, medicine and sanitation products for women and girls. In the longer term, the children Unrwa educates in Gaza – already deep in trauma after the most brutal civilian bombardment since the second world war – will become a lost generation … This will seriously undermine the prospects of peace in the Middle East for many years,” he said.

Israel has said it will work with international partners – who have heavily criticised the anti-Unrwa move – to “facilitate humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza in a way that does not threaten Israel’s security”, but is yet to propose an alternative aid structure.

In Jerusalem, if the ban went ahead, Unrwa would have to shutter its headquarters in the half of the city annexed by Israel, effectively ending its presence there. In Shuafat, the only one of 27 refugee camps across the Palestinian territories on the annexed Jerusalem side of Israel’s West Bank separation wall, 16,500 people would immediately be cut off from health and education services.

“You see how things are here,” said Samer al-Qam, 47, gesturing around Shuafat’s chaotic main street. “Unrwa runs the camp’s schools, and the health clinic. It’s a major employer. Are the Israelis going to come and do it? This is not just about Unrwa … I think it’s about getting rid of Palestinians completely.”

Aida Saleh, 67, said: “I am diabetic and I need the Unrwa clinic for my insulin. Yes, it would be better if we didn’t have to rely on it, but if Israel will not give us rights there is no other choice.”

Unrwa’s mandate is to provide life-giving services to anyone who has “lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict”, a mission widened after the 1967 war, when the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories began. The agency is also charged with caring for descendants of refugees; the population it serves now numbers more than 5.6 million across Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria.

From an initial focus on relief, as the decades passed Unrwa channelled its resources into education, healthcare and social services. The total regional budget in 2023 was about $1.6bn, funded almost entirely by voluntary national contributions, with the biggest donor being the US ($422m).

Dependence on the US and the voluntary nature of the funding has made Unrwa vulnerable in the past. The Trump administration cut funding in 2018, claiming other countries were not paying enough and that the agency was “a hurdle to peace”. Much of the funding gap was made up by other countries until the Biden administration ordered it resumed in 2021.

Several western donors suspended funding for the agency after the 7 October allegations, although all but one – the US – have now restored financial support.

In Israel, the wisdom of the ban has been questioned, given the Biden administration’s latest insistence that Israel take immediate action to let more humanitarian aid into Gaza. Potential punishments could include a halt to US weapons transfers.

The measure is “populist” and “political”, according to Shira Efron, a senior director at the Israeli Policy Forum thinktank, speaking to the Times of Israel.

“The country is fighting in Gaza, fighting in Lebanon; it’s finished round two in Iran, which could develop into round three; there are threats from Iraq, Syria, and Yemen; Israel is trying to keep a lid on the West Bank,” she said. “To have this legislation now misses the strategic point.”
UK

Union looking to challenge abolition of Winter Fuel Payment

Rory Poulter
Sun 3 November 2024 


-Credit: (Image: Getty)

The Unite union, which is a major financial backer of Labour MPs, is launching a legal challenge to overturn the abolition of the Winter Fuel Payment. The abolition of the payment, which is worth £100-£300, has left 10 million pensioners out of pocket ahead of the winter.

Some estimates suggest as many as 4,000 of older people may die as a result of medical conditions made worse by living in a cold and damp house. The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has faced condemnation from backbench Labour MPs, charities and the opposition for removing the universal payment by limiting it the poorest individuals who qualify for Pension Credit.


But now she and the government face the embarrassment of a challenge from a Labour-supporting union that has donated more than £500,000 to more than 80 of the party’s MPs sitting in the House of Commons.

Unite has launched a judicial review process on behalf of the union and its retired members to overturn the government’s decision to cut the winter fuel payment to all but the poorest pensioners. It has sent a pre-action protocol letter to Liz Kendal the secretary of state at the Department for Works and Pensions (DWP), requesting the government reverse the removal the Winter Fuel Payment and repeal the regulations introduced in August 2024.

Unite’s case is built on the belief that the government has acted unlawfully, and its action will have a terrible effect on millions of older people in society and will likely cause an increase in cold related deaths. The government has been given until November 7 to respond to the letter and reverse its decision or face an application to the High Court to mount a full judicial review to decide on whether the decision was legal.

The Unite General Secretary, Sharon Graham, who has often criticised the Labour leadership, said: “People do not understand, I do not understand how a Labour government has taken away the fuel allowance of millions of pensioners just as winter approaches.

“Given the failure to rectify this in the budget, Unite has now commenced judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of the policy. It is not too late for Labour to register the hurt that this cruel policy has caused, step back from picking the pockets of pensioners and do the right thing.”

The union has identified several of its members to put forward as test cases, all of whom are on low incomes in retirement, but none of them qualify for pension credit and therefore are no longer eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment.

Unite is challenging the removal of the Winter Fuel Payment on several grounds including:

• The government had a legal duty to refer the cut to the Social Security Advisory Committee. Its failure to do so makes the regulations void.

• The government should have gathered considerable evidence about the policy on the impact of the cut, meaning that the decision is irrational.

• Under the Equality Act there is a Public Sector Equality Duty to consider the impact of the decision particularly on the disabled who have higher heating costs.

• The requirement to take into account relevant considerations has been breached, including relating to fuel poverty and financial circumstances of those living just above the pension credit threshold.

• In Wales there is a specific legal duty to consider the full impact of the policy, this was ignored

• The Human Rights Act requires particular areas of vulnerability to be taken into account, which could include the impact of the policy on older people, those with a disability and potentially on race.

The union said that given the cut has already come into effect and the worsening winter weather it is hopeful the High Court will grant an early hearing.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer previously defended the "tough" decision to cut the universal benefit.

Sir Keir said the cut was necessary because of the state of the country’s finances, accusing previous governments of avoiding confronting issues like the cost of winter fuel payments. In Scotland, a couple has also been given permission to proceed with their own legal bid against both the UK and Scottish governments over scrapping the benefit.

Trade union threatens legal action over winter fuel cut

Christopher McKeon, PA Political Correspondent
Sun 3 November 2024 


A major trade union has threatened legal action over the Government’s decision to means-test winter fuel payments.

Around 10 million pensioners will no longer receive the benefit from this winter after the Government decided to restrict payments to people on pension credit in a bid to save money.

Ministers said the move was necessary to help fill a £22 billion “black hole” they claim the previous government left in this year’s spending plans.

But the trade union Unite said it believed the cut to winter fuel payments would have a “terrible effect” on millions of pensioners and demanded the Government reverse its decision or face a judicial review.

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: “People do not understand, I do not understand how a Labour government has taken away the fuel allowance of millions of pensioners just as winter approaches.

“Given the failure to rectify this in the budget, Unite has now commenced judicial review proceedings challenging the legality of the policy.

“It is not too late for Labour to register the hurt that this cruel policy has caused, step back from picking the pockets of pensioners and do the right thing.”

The union said it believed the Government had breached its legal duties by not referring the cut to the Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC) and by failing to consider the impact on disabled people, among other grounds.

Ministers are not required to refer regulations on benefits to the SSAC if they are a matter of “urgency”, something the Government relied on when implementing the winter fuel cut.

The Government also conducted an “equalities analysis”, which was released under the Freedom of Information Act, but has been criticised for not carrying out a full impact assessment of the policy.

Unite has given the Government until November 7 to respond to a pre-action letter sent last week and reverse the cut, otherwise it would request permission from the High Court for a full judicial review.

The push for a judicial review of the policy will further strain relations between Labour and Unite, which had previously been a significant donor to the party.

The union has already expressed opposition to the winter fuel payment cut, staging a protest outside this year’s Labour Party conference over the issue.

A Government spokesperson said: “We are committed to supporting pensioners – with millions set to see their state pension rise by up to £1,700 this parliament through our commitment to the triple lock.

“Over a million pensioners will still receive the winter fuel payment, and our drive to boost pension credit take up has already seen a 152% increase in claims. While many others will also benefit from the £150 warm home discount to help with their energy bills over winter.”