Friday, November 29, 2024

How Animal Agriculture Threatens Freshwater Supplies
November 29, 2024
Facebook

Wheel of Fortune, woodcut, by Sue Coe.

Fresh water is critical to the survival of ecosystems and living beings worldwide. However, as much as we all depend on water, some industries are notorious for their unsustainable water usage and rising contribution to water pollution. Factory farms are a prime offender.

Groundwater—underground water in sand, soil, and rock—is a vital source of fresh water, comprising 99 percent of such water supply. “Groundwater provides almost half of all drinking water worldwide, around 40 percent of the water used in irrigation and about one-third of the supply required for industry,” according to UNESCO, which hosted the world’s first UN-Water summit in December 2022.

The importance of groundwater was the main topic of discussion during the summit. Two issues of particular concern were overexploited aquifers, which could lead to water shortages, loss of ecosystems, and land subsidence, and polluted aquifers, which would have disastrous consequences for people, animals, and crops.

With such a valuable natural resource quite literally underfoot, what happens above ground can have a significant effect—for better or worse. Factory farms dense with animal life sustain high levels of surface water usage and contribute to water pollution through runoff. Considering that factory farms exploit and pollute groundwater aquifers, their overall environmental effects are devastating.

“The National Water Quality Assessment shows that agricultural runoff is the leading cause of water quality impacts to rivers and streams, the third leading source for lakes, and the second-largest source of impairments to wetlands,” points out the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Factory farming touches every aspect of our planet, from emitting massive amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere to contaminating the groundwater, rivers, lakes, and streams we rely on for fresh water. Factory farms house animals in crowded and often filthy conditions, subjecting millions of cows, chickens, and pigs to the worst forms of abuse for the entirety of their short lives. Driven by the demand for cheap eggs, meat, and dairy, the animal agriculture industry has disastrous consequences for the planet. This must change.

Assessing Water Risk

Agricultural runoff from barnyards, feedlots, and cropland carries pollutants like manure, fertilizers, ammonia, pesticides, livestock waste, toxins from farm equipment, soil, and sediment to local water sources. According to a February 2022 article by the Public Interest Research Groups, the factory farming industry is one of the leading causes of water pollution in the United States. The animal agriculture industry is also a front-runner for water risk, which makes it an environmentally unsustainable practice.

Scientists assess “water risk” by evaluating the possibility of water-related issues like scarcity, flooding, drought, or water stress. A Ceres report called “Feeding Ourselves Thirsty,” which looked at public disclosures by companies until June 2021, identified four industries with the highest exposure to water risks: agricultural products, beverages, meat, and packaged foods.

“Agricultural products” refer to items made by farming plants or animals. The International Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) states that agricultural production is “highly dependent on water and increasingly subject to water risks.” The OECD also highlights agricultural production as a major source of water pollution.

Why is this a problem? Water is vital in factory farming—from growing crops to feeding livestock to cleaning facilities. It’s also an essential resource for every living being. So, while agricultural organizations must ensure their water use remains in the realm of sustainability, a 2022 report by the Investigate Midwest suggests that’s not happening.

“Most large companies have policies to reduce water use and pollution. But some of the largest meat companies in the U.S. lack measures such as water reduction targets, watershed protection plans, and incentives for suppliers to conserve water,” wrote Madison McVan of Investigate Midwest, citing the Ceres analysis.

Further, Ceres reports that Pilgrim’s Pride, one of the largest global poultry producers, set a public goal to decrease its water use intensity (or the amount of water used to produce a pound of chicken) by 10 percent by 2020. Instead, it self-reported that it had increased its water use in its U.S. operations by 5 percent

From 2019 to 2022, the company said it had increased its water use by 12 percent. To complicate matters, in February 2024, New York’s Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against JBS (which owns Pilgrim’s Pride, among other meat companies), accusing it of greenwashing its product and misleading consumers about its impact on the environment.

Water Scarcity

It is increasingly critical for the agricultural industry to join water conservation efforts. As the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) indicates, water scarcity remains a pressing global concern. Just 3 percent of our planet’s water is fresh, including water frozen in glaciers (which accounts for about 2 percent). Because fresh water is a limited natural resource, the animal agriculture industry’s high water use is a growing concern.

In 2024, animal agriculture accounted for almost a third of freshwater use globally. The Meat Atlas 2021 states that animal feed from arable crops requires about 43 times more water to produce than feed like grass or roughage that animals could access if they were allowed to graze. In 2014, more than 67 percent of crops in the U.S. went to animal feed. In 2020, WWF estimated that almost 80 percent of the world’s soybean crops were used in animal feed. In the same year, in the U.S., 38.7 percent of corn was used to feed animals.

A 2020 study by the Animal Legal Defense Fund shows that just one slaughterhouse in Livingston, California, used approximately 4 million gallons of water daily in the live-shackle slaughter of chickens—accounting for about 60 percent of the city’s water usage. That’s equivalent to using about 2 billion gallons of water annually.

Moreover, in January 2022, the New Roots Institute stated, “Every day, 2 billion gallons of water are withdrawn from freshwater resources for the farming of land animals in the U.S.”

The slaughterhouse used some water in electrified stun baths and some in scalding tanks to de-feather chickens. Because this inhumane approach to slaughter is so terrifying for chickens, slaughterhouses also use vast amounts of water to clean feces and vomit from the chickens’ bodies after live-shackle slaughter.

Water Use Is One of Many Harms Caused by Factory Farming

The tremendous amount of water needed to grow crops for feed, clean facilities, raise animals, and slaughter them puts immense pressure on Earth’s limited freshwater resources. Evidence suggests most meatpacking organizations don’t ensure sustainable water practices in their supply chains. This does not bode well for the planet’s long-term impact on humans, animals, and ecosystems.

Factory farming not only causes endless and unnecessary animal suffering but also uses an excessive amount of environmental resources, pollutes the planet, and consumes vast amounts of freshwater supplies. But animal agriculture impacts much more than freshwater: Meat-based diets harm the environmentnonhuman animals, and human health.

We must work together as concerned citizens, consumers, and voters to end factory farming and repair our broken, cruel, damaging, and unsustainable food systemActivists worldwide are advocating for change, and plant-based diets are steadily increasing. According to the Plant Based Foods Association, the number of U.S. citizens choosing plant-based diets increased to 70 percent in 2023 from 66 percent in 2022. Moving to a world without animal suffering or environmental degradation is possible. But it requires all of us to change how we eat and live to make it happen.

This article was produced by Earth | Food | Life, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Vicky Bond is a veterinary surgeon, animal welfare scientist, and the president of The Humane League.

- - - - 

Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Peter Singer. Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 1 (Spring 1972), pp. 229-243 [revised edition]. As I write this, in ...


* In TOM REGAN & PETER SINGER (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1989, pp. 148-. 162. Page 2. men are; dogs, on the other ...

That's an important step forward, and a sign that over the next forty years we may see even bigger changes in the ways we treat animals. Peter Singer. February ...

In Practical Ethics, Peter Singer argues that ethics is not "an ideal system which is all very noble in theory but no good in practice." 1 Singer identifies ..

Beasts of. Burden. Capitalism · Animals. Communism as on ent ons. s a een ree. Page 2. Beasts of Burden: Capitalism - Animals -. Communism. Published October ...

Nov 18, 2005 ... Beasts of Burden forces to rethink the whole "primitivist" debate. ... Gilles Dauvé- Letter on animal liberation.pdf (316.85 KB). primitivism ..


Teamster President Sean O’Brien’s Wager: Did He Win?



 November 29, 2024
Facebook

At the beginning of 2024, Teamster President Sean O’Brien made a wager. He bet that if he flattered and fawned over Donald Trump, the former president would make the union leader his fair-haired boy. So, O’Brien visited Trump at Mar-a-Lago, invited Trump to Teamster headquarters in Washington to meet with union members, and then, breaking with the rest of the labor movement, he spoke at the Republican convention where he praised the billionaire Republican candidate. Once Trump was elected, O’Brien recommended to him that he appoint Lori Chavez-DeRemer, a former Oregon Republican congressperson, to be Secretary of Labor because she had supported the Pro-Act that would make it easier for unions to organize. Trump selected her and O’Brien flew back to Mar-a-Lago to stand for a portrait with the president-elect and Chavez.

O’Brien believes he won his wager. But did he?

Chavez-DeRemer, as far as we know, doesn’t have a great passion fort advancing workers and their unions. She only came out for the Pro-Act it seems because she was running in a swing district that leans toward the Democrats and hope to attract some votes. But her opportunism failed, and she lost anyway. So now, if confirmed, she will be promoted to Secretary of Labor, supposedly to help the Teamsters and other workers. [See update in note. *]

In fact, however, the Secretary of Labor does not actually have much power to protect the Teamsters or to improve the lives of workers. As Secretary, Chavez-DeRemer’s job will be to enforce existing labor laws and to propose new ones, though in the new Trump administration, made up of billionairesand anti-union reactionaries, proposing progressive labor laws will be practically impossible, even if she were so inclined.

Far more important for unions is the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), today a progressive body defending workers right to organize, but tomorrow under Trump’s appointees an anti-union operation. A recent decision by the NLRB chosen by the Biden-Harris administration gave the Teamsters union an important victory, ruling that some 275,000 drivers employed by Delivery Service Partners, or DSPs, so-called “third parties,” are joint employees of DSPS and Amazon and can be organized and represented by the Teamsters. The decision spurred the current organizing drive. But O’Brien supported Trump who will throw out the current NLRB general counsel, appointee and a pro-employer counsel who will throw out previous NLRB decisions and shred pro-labor positions.

Then too there is Trump’s Project 2025, several of whose authors Trump has now selected for high office, which will devastate the unions. Project 25 will make union organizing more difficult, reduce overtime pay, weaken health and safety protections, make it harder to raise the minimum wage, and affect many other labor rights and protections.

Beyond the unions is the broader attack on the working class, and if the working class becomes weaker in general, so will the Teamsters. Immigrant workers will be on the front line. Trump’s white nationalist immigration advisor Steven Miller and former acting director of ICE and intellectual author of the family separation policy Thomas Homan have been charged with rounding up and deporting some eleven million undocumented immigrants who are workers in agriculture, dairy farms, meat packing, construction, hotels and restaurants, many of them union members and some of them Teamsters. In the West Coast state of California, Oregon and Washington, there are something like 200,000 Teamster food processing workers, most of the immigrants and no doubt some undocumented. These attacks on the immigrants will rip the heart out of some local unions.

What we can also expect is the attack on public employees. Trump’s buddy Elon Musk, the high-tech tycoon and world’s richest man, now sometimes referred to as “the co-president,” is a fierce opponent of unions and treats his employees in demeaning and humiliating ways. Trump has given Musk and pharmaceutical magnate Vivek Ramaswamy the job of slashing government bureaucracy. There are 1.2 million union members in the federal sector, and Trump and Musk want to get rid of them and other workers protected by civil service and replace them with political appointees. If they are successful, many government agencies providing health, education, and social security services may become dysfunctional, affecting millions of working families, children, the elderly, and those with disabilities.

O’Brien wrote in an opinion piece in the journal Compact, “For decades, the Teamsters and the GOP haven’t seen eye-to-eye on many issues. But in recent years, a growing group of Republicans have proved that they are willing to listen to and stand with workers fighting a broken system.” Not true. Not at all true. In fact, the Republican Party has become more anti-union and anti-worker than ever, determined to destroy unions and attack workers. While the president appointed Chavez-DeRemer, many Republicans loathe her because she couponed the Pro-Act which would have facilitated union organizing. So she might not be confirmed by the Senate.

Beyond these traditional labor issues, Trump’s threat to declare a national emergency and to mobilize the U.S. military to confront social protests threatens the democratic rights and civil liberties of all working people. Most Americans are wage-earners, working people, and so civil rights movements such as Black Lives Matter, the Women’s March, and demonstrations for LGBT rights are also part of the workers’ movement in the broadest sense. These movements, just like workers and unions, need the right to speak out, to publish the truth, and to gather and march to protest.

U.S. unions and workers are threatened by Trump, and if any of them lose, we all lose, including the Teamsters. O’Brien believes that having virtually endorsed Trump and gotten approval for his Labor Secretary candidate, that he won his wager. I believe he lost and because of that vain bet we could all lose.

*I believe I’ve given Lori Chavez-DeRemer short shrift. She seems to have a great commitment to labor than I’ve given her. As note in Vox, Nov. 27, 2024, “She has a solid pro-worker record that differs notably from many of the positions Trump has previously backed. Chavez-DeRemer is one of just five House Republicans who supported the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, a bill that would expand workers’ ability to unionize that Trump’s White House advisers recommended he veto. She also backed the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act, legislation that shields public sector workers’ ability to unionize, which conservatives have also chafed against. And she voted against a GOP effort to overturn a Biden administration labor rule related to workers’ retirement savings, Bloomberg Law reports.” Nevertheless, she has little possibility of influencing Trump’s policies, which will be anti-worker and anti-union.