Thursday, December 12, 2024

SHARK HERDING 

Sharks hunting prey photo wins top award

By Alex Robertson
NZ Herald·
11 Dec, 2024


The hunt from above - juvenile blacktip reef shark's schooling fish in the Maldives is the winning image in the 2024 Royal Society Publishing Photography Competition. Photo / Angela Albi

An aerial view of sharks rounding up their prey has won the overall prize in the Royal Society Publishing Photography Competition 2024, announced this week.

The winning image, dubbed “the hunt from above” is the work of postdoctoral researcher Dr Angela Albi studying predator-prey interactions of sharks and fish at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour.

“Just after sunrise or before sundown, the shallow waters of the Maldives become a clear, see-through surface,” she said. “These are also the moments when we best observe the interactions between reef sharks and their prey. In this frame, captured during a research trip in 2024, a shark on the far-left shifts suddenly from swimming calmly within the school to initiating a hunt, its body posture standing out from the others. While we still don’t know what triggers these attacks, we analyse videos to study how sharks hunt and how their prey responds collectively.”

Hugh Turvey, competition judge and Science Committee Chairman at the Royal Society said the bird’s-eye view of the scene helps the raw instincts of nature come to life.

“As the school of fish move in almost perfect synchrony then split to avoid the sharks, the contrast between the collective movements of the fish and the sharks’ calculated group pursuit perfectly demonstrates the delicate balance between predator and prey,” he said.

Albi received £1000 (NZ$2200) in prize money and membership to the Royal Photographic Society.

The awards were launched in 2015 to celebrate 350 years of the oldest continual scientific journal in the world, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. This year’s competition is a collaboration between Royal Society Publishing and the Royal Photographic Society. It welcomed entries in five categories with winners in each category winning £500 and membership to the Royal Photographic Society.

Two nebulae in the Cassiopeia constellation are the subject of Imran Sultan’s Astronomy winning image Heart and Soul. “Found more than 7000 light years away, the Heart and Soul are two breathtaking nebulae in the Cassiopeia constellation,” Sultan said. “The nebulae are immense regions of star formation in our galaxy - my picture shows an area of the sky that is nine full moons across.”

David Garcia won the Earth Science category with his image of a supraglacial melting lake over the Greenland ice sheet. “Increasing in numbers due to climate change, they can suddenly drain if a crack in the ice appears, hydrofracturing, collecting water at the bottom of the lubricating the glacier and speeding its flow towards the ocean,” explained Garcia. “Greenland’s ice sheet is the second largest ice mass in our planet, and its melting would raise the sea level approximately 7m.”

Ecology and Environmental science was won by Peter Hudson with his stunningly-timed image of a secretary bird eating a locust. Hudson said, “Secretary birds... stalk around the savannah and feed on locusts, lizards and amphibians by punching them on the ground. This bird has just caught a locust, and as it swallows its prey it synchronously closes its third eyelid, the nictitating membrane across its eyes, to protect them from damage.”

“This image depicts the eyes of a bark scorpion (Centruroides exilicauda) from Baja California, Mexico, observed under fluorescence,” said Jose Manuel Martinez Lopez of his Microimaging winning shot. “After several hours of working with the specimen, the scorpion dried out, allowing me to capture the 110 images necessary for the focus stacking process.”

The Royal Society, founded in 1660, aims to recognise, promote, and support excellence in science and to encourage the development and use of science for the benefit of humanity.

The Royal Photographic Society is an educational charity with an international membership that aspires to make the art and science of photography more widely available and is committed to bringing photography to everyone.

Discover more at https://royalsociety.org/

 

Afghanistan National Institute of Music calls for global action against Taliban’s cultural repression

The Afghanistan National Institute of Music (ANIM), operating in exile, issued a strong condemnation of the Taliban’s systematic repression of cultural rights in Afghanistan on Human Rights Day, urging the international community to take decisive action.

In a statement, the institute described cultural rights as an integral part of human rights and a vital tool for fostering national identity and social cohesion. The Taliban’s policies, it argued, have targeted these rights, contributing to a broader assault on human rights in the country.

“The systematic violation of cultural rights in Afghanistan under the Taliban is an attack on the soul of the nation,” the statement said.

A call for global solidarity

The institute called on the global community and human rights organizations to explicitly denounce the Taliban’s actions and exert diplomatic and practical pressure to restore the cultural rights of Afghans. It also urged support for artists, musicians, and cultural activists facing direct threats under Taliban rule.

The statement reaffirmed ANIM’s commitment to preserving and promoting Afghanistan’s cultural heritage and human rights, emphasizing that music and the arts remain symbols of creativity, hope, and national identity.

The institute warned of the risk of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage being forgotten under the current regime and appealed for increased international efforts to safeguard the nation’s artistic and cultural traditions.

“Music and the arts are the beacons of a nation’s soul, and their preservation is essential for its future,” the statement read.

Since the Taliban returned to power in August 2021, cultural rights have been severely curtailed, with music banned and artists subjected to threats, arrests, and violence. Critics view these actions as part of a broader agenda to suppress freedom of expression and cultural diversity.


Taliban’s PVPV ministry summon media still broadcasting some forms of music, demanding them to stop it

File photo.

The Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice summoned media in Kabul still broadcasting some forms of music, demanding them to stop it.

The ministry said in a statement that the media officials were also asked to avoid publishing or broadcasting content deemed to be “contrary to Islamic principles and Afghan culture.”

Widening restrictions on media

This latest move adds to a growing list of unprecedented restrictions the Taliban have imposed on Afghanistan’s media and journalists over the past three years.

The United Nations recently reported that more than 330 journalists and media workers have been detained by the Taliban during this period, further highlighting the erosion of press freedoms in the country.

The 26-page report, published by the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the UN Human Rights Office, covered the period from August 15, 2021, to September 30, 2024. It outlines human rights violations against 336 journalists, including 256 cases of arbitrary detention, 130 of torture or ill-treatment, and 75 instances of threats or intimidation.

“Afghanistan’s media sector has been deeply eroded, operating in an environment of censorship and fear,” the report states. The Taliban’s measures—ranging from arbitrary arrests to ill-defined “red lines” for reporting—have created a pervasive culture of self-censorship among journalists.

The Taliban have imposed sweeping restrictions, including an 11-point media directive prohibiting content deemed contrary to Islam or national values, the report says.

According to the report, Journalists are frequently required to obtain approval from the Ministry of Information and Culture before publishing sensitive reports, while media outlets accused of violating these guidelines face closure.

Key findings of the report include:

“A large number of media outlets” shut down after the Taliban takeover due to “loss of revenue”; “exodus of journalists”; and Taliban “restrictions.”

The Taliban “continue to create an extremely challenging” media environment.

Taliban “interfering with editorial content and internal operation of media outlets have substantially diminished media freedom.”

The UN has documented 336 cases of “arrest,” “torture,” and “intimidation” of journalists by the Taliban.

The Taliban’s conduct has created “a culture of self-censorship.”

Media are often required to “coordinate and seek approval” from the Taliban “prior to publishing a report; while news agendas are subjected to pre-vetting.”

Broadcasting music is banned; “men and women must work in segregated workspaces” and not appear in a program together.

Morality law added new restrictions, including “the prohibition to create or display images of living beings; the voice of women is now considered private; and drivers are not allowed to provide transportation to women without a mahram.”

In 2023, the number of male media workers increased by 10% and female media workers by 17%, as compared to 2022.

The restrictions have drawn widespread criticism from human rights groups and the international community, which view them as part of a broader effort to suppress free expression and dissent under Taliban rule.


China Compels Myanmar Rebel Groups To Negotiate With Junta – OpEd

myanmar china japan thailand map

By 

China has forced two powerful armed rebel groups in north Myanmar to start negotiations with the Burmese military junta and call off the 1027 offensive they started October last year.


Experts say this might well be the most decisive Chinese intervention to stop a conflict in its neighborhood and might well set the tenor for a more proactive future policy on such issues. 

The Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army (MNDDA), which represents ethnic Kokangs, recently agreed to engage in talks with the State Administrative Council (SAC) under Chinese mediation.

This is the second Three Brotherhood Alliance member to offer to negotiate to the junta after the Ta’ang National Liberation Army made a similar move last week. The MNDAA, the TNLA and the Arakan Army are part of the three-group Brotherhood Alliance which started the 1027 offensive in October last year.

But the Arakan Army which has liberated much of the coastal province of Rakhine (formerly Arakans) has refused to stop fighting and this week captured a key border outpost in Maungdaw district bordering Bangladesh. That may worry China because the deep-sea port of Kyaukphyu it funded on the Rakhine coast may come under attack.  Kyaukphyu sits at one end of the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor that connect its southwestern province of Yunnan with the Rakhine province on the Bay of Bengal .

Other ethnic rebel groups like the powerful Kachin Independence Army have also continued  their armed offensive against the junta alongwith by majority Bamar armed groups like People’s Defense Forces owing allegiance to the National Unity Government (NUG). The Burmese army has suffered huge loss of territory to the rebels.


The Kachin state borders on China and is hub of the burgeoning rare earth’s mining hub of Pang War, which is now in the hands of the KIA. The devout Christians that the Kachins are, their rebel group has been uncomfortable with China’s expanding economic and strategic footprint in Myanmar. 

Fifteen years ago, the KIA and other Kachin organisations forced the Myanmar military junta to stop work on the 6000MW Myitsone hydroelectric project on the upstream of Irrawaddy River in the Kachin state. The huge 6 billion US dollar project, the Kachin feared, would submerge huge swathes of fertile lands and the electricity generated would be totally exported to China without any benefit for the local economy.

MNDAA, TNLA Announce Ceasefire

“We will cease fire immediately and will not actively attack the Myanmar army from today onwards,” the MNDAA said in a statement last week.

It also promised to “firmly safeguard Myanmar’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as a unified country and will not split the country or seek independence”.

“Under the mediation of China, we are willing to engage in peace talks with the Myanmar army on issues such as Lashio,” the MNDAA statement said, referring to the town in northern Shan State it seized in August along with the military’s North Eastern Command.

Reports from Lashio say that Myanmar national flags were hoisted along with MNDAA flags in several places in the city. 

The MNDAA also said it’s “willing to send a high-level delegation” to hold talks with the regime aimed at “resolving conflicts and differences through political means”.

However, the group also called on the regime to stop its “aerial attacks and ground offensives across the country”, and claimed that it’s preserving its right to self-defense. 

The MNDAA decision to start negotiations comes amid reports that Chinese intelligence had placed one of its top commander  under house arrest in Yunnan capital Kunming to pressure his troops to withdraw from Lashio.

MNDAA’s Commander Detained

 MNDAA’s top commander Peng Daxun (aka Peng Daren) has been in China since his meeting with Chinese special envoy to Myanmar Deng Xijun in Yunnan Province’s Kunming city in late October. The Chinese said he was undergoing medical treatment but a senior member of the Federal Political Negotiation and Consultative Committee (FPNCC) claimed that Peng Daxun had not been allowed to return to Myanmar because he had resisted Chinese pressure to withdraw his fighters  from Lashio. The FPNCC is an alliance of seven ethnic armed groups including the MNDAA.

“I can confirm that he has been detained, but I can’t provide details. We’re facing challenges and pressures,” the FPNCC member said last month, insisting on anonymity.

Other sources in the resistance say China was alarmed when the National Unity Government ( NUG), which claims to be the “real government” of Myanmar, offered to make Peng Daxun its vice-president in an attempt to integrate the ethnic armed groups including a broader national coalition against the junta.

China sees the NUG as pro-western and inimical to its extensive interests in Myanmar. 

Junta’s Lashio Loss Rattled China

The seizure of Lashio marked the loss of  a capital city and a regional command headquarters  by the Burmese military to anti-regime forces, which dented the junta’s image and raised serious questions over its ability to defeat the rebel offensive 1027. It emboldened the anti-junta resistance forces to encircle Myanmar’s second biggest city Mandalay where the army’s Central Command is headquartered.

China was rattled by the fall of Lashio and the encirclement of Mandalay because it put at grave risk most of its mega projects on the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor ( CMEC) funded under President Xi Jinping’s ambitious Belt & Road Initiative ( BRI). 

That included the oil-gas pipeline and the railroad connecting Yunnan with the China-funded deep seaport of Kyaukphyu on the Rakhine coast in the Bay of Bengal, where rebels of the Arakan Army has notched major success in recent months.  Mandalay is not only the hub of the lucrative Burmese gems and precious stones that is largely controlled by Chinese traders but also sits on the Kunming-Kyaukphyu oil-gas pipeline. Two years ago, the PDF rebels had set off explosions on an offtake station of the pipeline in Natogyi township of Mandalay and caused considerable damage.

China’s Multi-Pronged Myanmar Strategy

China has for long played all sides in Myanmar, cultivating both the military junta and the ethnic armed groups active near the its border with Myanma , including the MNDAA. Realising the threat to its economic and strategic interests, Beijing lost no time in decisively intervening in the Myanmar conflict.

It not only pressurised the MNDAA and the TNLA to withdraw from Lashio but also forced the United Wa State Army (UWSA) to cut off the supply of food, fuel, medicines and other resources to the two ethnic armies, driving a wedge between it and the other two groups.

The UWSA is Myanmar’s most powerful ethnic rebel army with nearly 30000 fighters heavily armed by the Chinese and its coffers bolstered by the synthetic drug trade. The Wa tribe formed the bulk of the combat elements of the once-powerful but now-defunct Burmese Communist Party before their leaders broke away to form the UWSA, which has been in effective control of the Wa Autonomous Region in the northern Shan State. The junta has practised live-and-let-live with UWSA, which has been supplied.

Beijing Hosts Junta Supremo

Following the fall of Lashio, the Chinese not only hosted junta supremo Senior General Min Aung Hlaing in Beijing to boost his legitimacy, the first time since the Feb 2021 coup, but also backed his plans to organise nationsl elections in late 2025.

According to latest reports, Chinese intelligence is trying to coax another powerful ethnic armed rebel group in the north to announce a ceasefire and stop fighting the Burmese army.

Sources in the powerful Kachin Independence Army (KIA) have confirmed the Chinese push for a stop to its offensive which has led to loss of much territory by the junta in the Kachin state.

The KIA in late October overran the Pang War township and huge areas around it that is considered the hub of Myanmar’s rare earth mining industry which almost wholly supplies China. 

Despite Chinese pressure, the KIA has so far not only refused to stop its offensive against the Burmese army but it has also shut down the most important border crossing with China, sending its rare earth companies in a tizzy and shares of its companies in a free fall in the country’s stock markets. 

“While China continues to pay lip service to ASEAN centrality and leadership on the Myanmar issue, it has emerged as the dominant external actor pushing to shape developments to its advantage,” says Myanmar expert Jason Tower in one of  his recent publication .

“In many respects,” writes Tower, “Myanmar is emerging as a test case for more robust Chinese security involvement overseas. Everything is on the table, from deploying Chinese police, to using technology to monitor and surveil activities beyond China’s border, to rolling out new approaches for overseas security on Belt and Road Initiative projects, to gaining a strategic advantage in platforms such as ASEAN.” 

In stark contrast, India has broadly followed a policy of “wait-and- watch”, reposing its hope on the ASEAN to break the deadlock with its Five-Point Consensus in Myanmar. It is now waking up to the need to deal with other non-state actors to address its connectivity and security concerns, but its actions have been limited to covert exploratory contacts. 




Subir Bhaumik is a former BBC and Reuters correspondent and author of books on South Asian conflicts.
REPUBLIC OF IRELAND

Labour leader holds exploratory coalition talks with Fianna Fail and Fine Gael



Labour leader Ivana Bacik held talks with Micheal Martin and Simon Harris on Tuesday (Brian Lawless/PA)

By David Young and Cate McCurry, PA


The leader of Ireland’s Labour Party has held talks with the Taoiseach and Tanaiste as efforts to form a new coalition government intensify.


Ivana Bacik had separate meetings with Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris on Tuesday afternoon.

Fianna Fail, which won 48 seats in last month’s general election, and Fine Gael, which secured 38 seats, headed up the last coalition in Dublin and are expected to continue that partnership into the next mandate.

However, with a combined 86 seats, they are just short of the 88 required for a majority in the Dail parliament.

If they wish to return to government together, they would need one smaller party as a junior partner, or a handful of independents.




Tanaiste and Fianna Fail leader Micheal Martin and Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Simon Harris (Gareth Chaney/PA)

Both Fianna Fail and Fine Gael have ruled out doing business with Sinn Fein, which won 39 seats

The centre-left Social Democrats and Irish Labour Party, both of which won 11 seats in the election, are seen as the only two realistic options if Fianna Fail and Fine Gael seek to convince a smaller party to join the coalition.

In a statement, the Labour Party said Ms Bacik outlined key policy priorities in her meetings with Taoiseach Mr Harris and Tanaiste Mr Martin.

“There was discussion in both meetings on policies and manifesto commitments on housing, health, climate, workers’ rights and disability services among other issues,” said the statement.

“The parliamentary party will meet at 1pm on Friday where the party leader will provide an assessment of engagement to date and consider the outcome of these meetings.”

A spokesman for Mr Harris said there had been a “constructive engagement” with Ms Bacik.

“The Taoiseach is grateful for the time and engagement on a range of substantial policy issues,” he said.

The spokesman said Mr Harris had also met independent TDs who are aligned together in what is called the regional group.

“These meetings have been productive,” he added.

They shouldn’t do it. They should learn the lessons of the past and actually work with other parties of the left to form a decent left opposition to Fianna Fail and Fine Gael and campaign on the issues that matterRichard Boyd Barrett

Mr Harris and party colleagues are due to meet the Social Democrats on Wednesday.

Fianna Fail deputy leader Jack Chambers and Fine Gael deputy leader Helen McEntee met on Tuesday evening for discussions on government formation, with the parties’ full negotiating teams set to meet on Wednesday.

Fine Gael said the meeting between Ms McEntee and Mr Chambers was “positive” and focused on the “structure and format” of the substantive negotiations going forward.

When the two parties entered coalition for the first time after the last general election in 2020, there was only a three-seat difference in their relative strength.

That resulted in an equal partnership at the head of the coalition, with the Green Party as the junior partner. The two main parties swapped the role of taoiseach halfway through the term.

With Fianna Fail’s lead over Fine Gael having grown to 10 seats following this election, focus has turned to the future of the rotating taoiseach arrangement and whether it will operate again in the next mandate and, if so, on what basis.

There are similar questions around the distribution of ministries and other roles.

While Mr Martin has so far refused to be drawn on the specifics, he has suggested that he expects Fianna Fail’s greater strength of numbers to be reflected in the new administration.

However, Mr Harris has insisted that Fine Gael’s mandate cannot be taken for granted when it comes to government formation.



Richard Boyd Barrett of People Before Profit-Solidarity urged the Labour Party not to consider going into government with Fianna Fail and Fine Gael (Niall Carson/PA)

Richard Boyd Barrett from People Before Profit-Solidarity, which won three seats, urged Labour not to “prop up” up a Fianna Fail/Fine Gael administration.

“We think that’s a huge mistake,” he told reporters in Dublin.

“They shouldn’t do it. They should learn the lessons of the past and actually work with other parties of the left to form a decent left opposition to Fianna Fail and Fine Gael and campaign on the issues that matter.”

His party colleague Paul Murphy pointed to the experience of the Green Party, which lost all but one of its 12 seats in the election.


“In reality, what is going to happen is a changing of the mudguard for Fianna Fail and Fine Gael,” he said.


“And for those who are now auditioning to be a new mudguard for Fianna Fail and Fine Gael, there is a very, very sharp and stark lesson in what happened to the Green Party – obviously almost entirely wiped out.

“We think it is a very major mistake for anyone who has the perception of being left, with the votes of people who are looking left, to seek to go into coalition with Fianna Fail and Fine Gael.”
UK
Labour MP calls on car maker to review plant closure

Amy Holmes
BBC News, Bedfordshire
BBC
Sarah Owen says Stellantis "could not have asked for more from the workers at the Luton Plant"


An MP has called on a car maker to review its decision to close a factory in a town after the boss of the firm quit.

In November, Stellantis announced plans to close its van-making factory in Luton, Bedfordshire, putting about 1,100 jobs at risk.

Carlos Tavares, the chief executive of Stellantis, left the company on 1 December following a boardroom clash.

At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday, Sarah Owen, the Labour MP for Luton North, asked the company to remain in the town or delay the site's closure until an alternative company could be found to run the factory.

When speaking in the House of Commons, Owen said: "Like every generation of Vauxhall worker in Luton, they meet every target set, they make every innovation demanded of them and they never give up."

She added "contrast that with Carlos Tavares, the [Stellantis] who quit days after making the decision to threaten more than 1,000 jobs in Luton."

In light of this "sudden departure", Owen asked Stellantis to "review the decision, do what is right by our town and stay put for good or until an alternative is found, to ensure that Luton's manufacturing history is also our future".

She said Stellantis "could not have asked for more from the workers at the Luton plant".

'Meaningful dialogue'


In response, Sir Keir Starmer said the government was "totally committed to supporting the workers and their families at this uncertain time".

He added the minister for industry would be meeting with the company "to discuss plans for workers and the site, to ensure that dedicated support is in place".

Following Stellantis' announcement to close the Luton factory, a spokesperson said: "There will be a meaningful dialogue with our union partners to agree the next steps.

"All situations will be taken into account and the company commits to providing the very best level of support for every single person impacted by this."

The company - which also owns brands including Vauxhall, Citroën and Peugeot - said it would combine its electric van production with its other UK plant in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire.

Rules imposed to speed up the transition to electric vehicles (EV) in the UK partly drove the decision, the firm previously said.
António Guterres' vision for climate justice in Africa's G20 leadership



Copyright © africanewsShiraaz Mohamed/Copyright 2024 The AP. All rights reserved.

By Dominic Wabwireh with AP

The UN Secretary-General António Guterres visited South Africa during its G20 Presidency, emphasizing the need for climate justice. He highlighted that Africa, with its youthful and expanding population, vibrant cultural and natural diversity, and strong entrepreneurial spirit, is hindered by injustices stemming from its colonial past.

”And I'm here at the critical time as South Africa assumes the presidency of the G20. This continent's potential is without question... Africa needs climate justice. The continent stands on the frontlines of the climate crisis. Despite causing minimal emissions, climate change is pummelling your people and pounding your economies. Africa is warming faster than the global average. We must limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius to stop this crisis from spiralling even further out of control,” said Guterres.

Guterres also voiced his worries to reporters about the chaos in the Middle East, notably the recent ousting of Syria's President Bashar Al Assad, while still holding onto optimism.

Understanding the climate emergency – part one
The climate emergency is now impossible to deny, yet governments lack the will and the vision to tackle it effectively




image by tete_escape. Licensed by Shutterstock [SD]


Most people in the world now know that the climate emergency is very very real, seriously threatens the well-being and existence of much of the world’s population, and has been getting worse at an alarming rate. Most people also know that the single biggest direct cause of this emergency is the extraction, burning and use of fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas and their derivatives), which releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This, together with the release of methane and other gases, traps heat which causes global warming. This causes dramatic and viciously harmful ocean and weather changes which play havoc with the planet’s eco-systems and animal and human living conditions.
280 parts per million (ppm) = The ideal level of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere
350 ppm = the maximum safe level (the planetary boundary)
424 ppm = the current level
Data from Global Monitoring Laboratory. See also Climate Portal

There are many other indirect contributory causes of the emergency too, such as the destruction of forests for farming, agri-business methods, neglect of nature, and the exponential growth of energy-hungry industries, manufacturing and distribution systems, together with some environmentally-costly lifestyles, policies and planning decisions.

Pressure groups like Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, Just Stop Oil, and many others, target governments, industries and companies with lobbying, campaign literature, meetings, protest marches, pressure campaigns and sometimes direct action, but with only limited success. They are up against a very powerful, well-financed, well-connected, international professional nexus of pro-fossil fuel interests, who have been shown over many years and decades to be almost unmoveable and invincible. They fight back strongly and successfully with their green-washing, disinformation, social media coverage, high-level lobbying and graft (politician buying).

All the pressure, arguments, overwhelming scientific evidence, United Nations reports, meetings, and demonstrations, have failed to secure the fast and extensive progress needed to reduce emissions and protect people from the environmental catastrophe that’s already here and accelerating.
Climate solutions are known and understood


Hope is not quite dead though. Technological changes are aiding progress, and some people, companies and governments are trying to reduce emissions, albeit too slowly according to recent reports from the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the UK’s Climate Change Committee. Both wind and solar-derived power sources are increasing their shares of the energy market, and wave and tidal energy is becoming commercially more viable. Other technologies are still mostly at the experimental stage. There are also some emission-reducing contributions from other sources, such as changes in people’s diet away from meat and dairy, and natural habitat and land use improvements. But much of industry, housing, planning, transport, aviation and personal lifestyles are resistant to change.

There is now abundant knowledge of the dire consequences of climate change – increasing impoverishment world-wide, widespread famine and death, increasing inequality, hunger and disease, loss of homes and livelihoods, mass migration, and nature depletion. This all contributes to the deadly and worsening impacts on human populations and the natural world.

There is also abundant knowledge of how to avert it. No other human problem has been so thoroughly explored, researched, understood, and potentially solved as the climate emergency in all its facets. For example, the International Energy Agency have said that there should be no new investments in oil, gas and coal from now on, and no new fossil-fuelled cars should be sold beyond 2035. But there is a huge gap between the rhetoric from governments and the reality. With the election of Donald Trump, we will have a regime in place which is not even pretending to make an effort.

So the climate emergency continues to remain unsolved in practice, despite strenuous efforts by some. The planet’s atmospheric carbon dioxide content continues to increase rapidly, and with it, the warming and climate deteriorations in so far as these are conducive to human habitation,

Why?


The blame game


It is common practice, when things go wrong, to look for someone or something to blame. People and organisations do it. It is a comforting process. It distributes responsibility, and ascribes, fairly or unfairly, incompetence or bad motives to another person or agency. It makes the blamer feel better.

On the receiving end of the blame game over global warming are firstly, governments, who permit, encourage, subsidise or de-regulate fossil fuel companies and the companies and organisations that support them. Secondly the industries themselves, that actually finance, extract, process, transport, supply and use the fuels. Thirdly, right-wing politicians and their voters who align themselves with the large and wealthy corporations who stand most to lose from a switch away from fossil fuels.

Blame needs to be tempered with a search for understanding, context, fundamental causes and wider issues. Blame requires an understanding that causes are rarely single or simple, are usually multiple and layered, and rarely exist without wider contributory factors.

Only in controlled laboratory experiments can individual effects be isolated, identified and linked to individual causes. In real life, such situations never exist. Blame associated with one simple cause or agency must be understood within the always-present wider context of multiple causes and contributory factors, if it is to help to focus attention on solutions.
Autocratic self interest


Over half the populations in the world are organised under autocratic governments, who respond very little to popular demand and have only limited respect for international agreements or United Nations mandates. They have their own priorities, usually related to maximising their own power. These do sometimes include some emission control policies. But there are now reports that Russia and China are seeking to exploit fossil fuel reserves in Antarctica, which is prohibited by the Antarctic Treaty originally adopted in 1960. Russia was an original signatory and China an associate member from 1983.

Russia sells as much fossil fuel as it can – and that is a lot – to fund its war in Ukraine and other acts of aggression. It is the mainstay of its economy. China continues to build coal-fired power stations, though at a lower rate now that its investments in solar and wind energy are increasing rapidly. India continues using coal extensively and buys cheap fossil fuel from Russia to aid its economic development. In the Middle-Eastern petro-states, the ruling families, governments and fossil-fuel companies are one and the same. None of these authoritarian countries take much responsibility for the common good of humankind.

China, Russia and India, plus the USA, account for 57% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions, while accounting for 42% of the world’s population. The oil-producing countries of the Middle East also have very high emissions per head of population.
Democratic limitations


Many other parts of the world are organised under democratic governments of various qualities where some progress towards achieving the UN’s target of net zero by 2050 is occurring, but not nearly fast enough. Progress is limited by the short length of parliamentary terms, normally five years or less, and by governments’ perception of voter intolerance towards the more immediate cost and impact of environmental control and climate mitigation policies.

There is much popular support in theory for more and better green policies. 72% of respondents in a recent United Nations poll favoured a swift transition to a green economy. But that support lessens when extra costs or restrictions are believed to be associated with them, though that is a general misperception. Green policies can reduce costs and increase employment markedly in the medium and longer term, the overall payback from intelligent green policies is excellent.

The climate emergency is impacting the whole planet and everyone on it. If a government’s first duty is to protect its citizens, then no government, autocracy or democracy, is doing enough to protect citizens from the very present and widely predicted ravages of climate change. One possible exception is wealthy Norway, where the take-up rate of electric vehicles and heat pumps is high, and much of its electricity is generated from hydro-electric plants, though it has licenced large fossil fuel extraction from the North Sea which is mostly exported.

The outcome of all the failing politics is that world temperatures continue to rise, floods, landslides, melting ice, heat waves, hurricanes and wildfires are becoming more frequent and widespread, world food and water supplies are becoming more unreliable and expensive, and nature is becoming more depleted. This is all predicted to become much worse unless much more serious remedial action is taken now.

Understanding the climate emergency – part two

"For our today, we took your tomorrow" - What are the barriers to concerted action on climate change?

Explosive population growth

From about half a billion people in 1600, one billion in 1800, world population is now around eight billion, and forecast to be ten billion by about 2060. This inevitably puts enormous pressure on the world’s natural and environmental resources and is probably unsustainable.




“Populations expand in such a way as to overtake the development of sufficient land for crops”
– Thomas Malthus, 1798.

This, Malthus conjectured, would cause widespread hunger and death, and would act as a limiting factor on unconstrained population growth.

This theory may yet prove correct, though could perhaps be rephrased as:


“Populations contract when environmental conditions deteriorate making life unsustainable”

Human populations are no different to other animal species in that respect. They rise or fall depending on their environment. But the idea of politically inspired ‘population control’ is probably unrealistic and undesirable.
Human nature

Humans naturally seek to make a living, house and feed their families, and improve themselves. If you live in a shack, you will strive to build a house. If you grew up uneducated, you will strive to obtain an education for your children. If you live in a small, damp, or cold flat or house without a garden, you will strive to move to something bigger and better equipped.

But this natural and reasonable process has now reached absurd lengths in some sections of society, where every car/house/holiday/boat/job/clothing outfit has to be regularly followed by something newer, bigger or better than the last one, or bigger and better than ones’ neighbour, in an endless race for additional comforts, pleasures, competitive advantage or status. Both reasonable consumption and conspicuous consumption and the consumer society has exploded. My early years, like most others in the 1940s, were spent without central heating, carpets, a washing machine, a fridge, a vacuum cleaner, a car, a garden, an electric blanket etc. Floating gin palaces, private jets and multiple home ownership are the most blatant examples of excessive consumption. Private affluence for a few, public squalor for many.
Growth in inequality

There have been rises in inequality of income, wealth and peoples’ carbon footprint in many countries. The rich have become richer, fuelling their acquisitiveness and adding disproportionately to global warming, and the poor relatively poorer, making them more vulnerable.

According to Oxfam, the richest 10% of the world’s population accounted for over half (52%) of the emissions added to the atmosphere between 1990 and 2015, and in 2019 the super-rich 1% were responsible for the same quantity of emissions (16%) as 66% of the lowest income people (5 billion).
Explosive industrial growth

From about $1trillion in 1800, world GDP grew to $8.5tn in 1950, and $119tn in 2020 (constant 2011 prices, source: Our World in Data). Over the decades, technology and productivity endlessly improved, demand and supply endlessly increased, better products and methods were endlessly invented, and the global economy grew and grew as transportation costs per unit fell. The system worked incredibly well, with increased human longevity and rising average living standards and quality of life for most people over the medium and longer term, despite many being left behind or trampled on in the process.
Fossil fuel subsidies

Governments provide financial help to their fossil fuel companies to encourage economic growth, employment, energy security and wealth-creation. The subsidies take various forms, such as tax breaks, direct payments, grants, price controls, tax credits, exploration tax reductions, offsets of losses, preferential loans, and implicit subsidies such as favourable public infrastructure improvements. It is estimated that world-wide fossil fuel subsidies amount to $10.5 tn per annum (The Conversation).
Short-termism

Major countries have made some progress, although most have not made nearly enough, especially Australia, the USA, and Canada. Priority has been given by so many countries to their own economy, the tax revenues and employment that comes with continued use of fossil fuels, and to their understanding of government survival and re-electability in the short term.

This short-termism, prioritising the economy now, eating jam today, comes at the expense of the medium and longer term, tomorrow. Through support of a more extensive and faster green transition with greater attention to social justice, there could be lower energy costs, and a good chance of averting a climate-induced catastrophe for the human race. The current prioritisation of the short term is a trajectory which is likely to lead to the longer-term elimination of the human race as we know it. No tomorrow.

But it is a trajectory which is being widely followed, and indeed advocated, for example in The Daily Telegraph. Author Jeremy Warner asks, why should the UK be actively pursuing net-zero when it only represents 1% of world emissions and when other countries like China, USA and Norway ignore their UN COP commitments and prioritize their own economies over protecting the climate? When other countries are cheating, so should the UK.

There are several replies to that. A faster transition to a green economy will provide the UK with more self-sufficiency and security in its energy supply, and deliver power to consumers and industry at a cheaper price; it will show the world that the UK honours its international obligations, which will inspire other countries to follow suit; and it will help to avert the climate catastrophe which is rapidly approaching and which will spell disaster and death to the UK and to the many people and communities around the world to whom we owe a moral obligation.

Also in The Daily Telegraph, author David Blackmon welcomes ‘The Return of Sanity to the Business World’ and the roll-back, he claims, of ‘the madness of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing’, as fossil fuel companies like BP, Shell, and Glencore adjust their portfolios away from sustainable sources and back to fossil fuels, including coal, and China doubles down on its use of coal. Business, not morality. But surely this is a very biased, regressive, irresponsible, and partisan view of such developments, and is in the face of repeated and urgent pleas from the United Nations not to act in this way.

Many people would choose, perhaps through force of circumstances or because of other priorities, not to save for their own future retirement. Psychologically, delaying gratification is hard. But the UK Government requires them to do so, through their national insurance, tax and employee superannuation payments.

Delaying a swift transition to a green economy is just as foolhardy. It will condemn future generations to a much harder life or extinction, which is not a legacy that current parents or grandparents would wish for their children and grandchildren. But as with pension saving, it will only happen if governments require them to do so. This should be a relatively easy sell, though it would be important to relate the payments to the ‘polluter pays’ principle.
Downsides

All the extra people, with their drive, cooperation and ability to succeed intact, have participated in and driven the economic system, causing the world economy to grow exponentially as the industrial revolution has spread. This was all largely made possible and supported by relatively cheap and available fossil-fuelled energy to drive all the mining, production, development, investment, packaging and transportation.

The natural environment, such as forests, green spaces, farmed land, oceans, rivers, ice sheets, air, plants, animals and natural resources such as coal, oil and gas, have been used freely, extensively over-exploited and plundered, and used as a dumping ground for waste.

Authoritarian governments proceed according to their own priorities. Democratic societies are run on shareholder capitalist lines, where company survival, size and profit are the main objectives, achieved by meeting and expanding demand. Laws, regulations, and taxes do place some boundaries on the drive for profit, securing some limited consideration of other objectives such as employee welfare and environmental impact.
Environmental boundaries

But environmental impacts have been very largely neglected, or only lightly considered, and nature, including its ability to store and process carbon, has been extensively depleted by all the excesses, with much of that unthinking, careless or wanton behaviour still on-going.

The planet’s environmental boundaries and limits have been comprehensively breached. The effects, most evident in global warming and nature depletion, and the consequences, are now glaringly obvious and threatening to all. Humans as a species are now becoming the victims of their own success. The Club of Rome, in their 1972 report ‘The Limits to Growth’, first drew the world’s attention to the consequences for planet Earth and its inhabitants. Their dire but far-sighted forecasts are seen in this graph:

World Model Standard Run as shown in The Limits to Growth 
image by YaguraStation. Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial license.

Their report was greeted with woefully myopic scepticism at the time.

Now, the Guardian tells us ‘Economic damage from climate change six times worse than thought’:

“ … many climate scientists predict a 3°C rise will occur by the end of this century due to the ongoing burning of fossil fuels, and a 3°C temperature increase will cause ‘precipitous declines in output, capital and consumption that exceed 50% by 2100 … the cost of transitioning away from fossil fuels and curbing the impacts of climate change, while not trivial, pale in comparison to the cost of climate change itself”

In fact many respected climate models are forecasting 4°C or 5°C rises by 2100. Because these rises are averages, this could mean rises of 6°C, 8°C or 10°C at the poles, the ice sheets wiped out, and sea level rises sufficient to wipe out many coastal cities and areas.

Part Three will consider possible ways forward for the people and the planet.



Paul Ryder
Paul is a retired Civil Servant. He has worked in local government (mainly Greater London Council) and central government (Department of Transport), and in the private sector as a consultant.