Wednesday, March 05, 2025

 

Study: Smartwatches could end the next pandemic


Everyday smartwatches are extremely accurate in detecting viral infection long before symptoms appear — now, research shows how they could help stop a pandemic before it even begins.



Aalto University

Smartwatches could end the next pandemic 

image: 

An illustrative figure highlighting the impact of early detection via smartwatch on viral spread. The image shows how the model can capture both symptomatic (A and C) and asymptomatic cases (B and D).

view more 

Credit: Märt Vesinurm et. al / Aalto University 2025





Everyday smartwatches are extremely accurate in detecting viral infection long before symptoms appear — now, research shows how they could help stop a pandemic before it even begins.

Early detection of sickness is critical for preventing its spread — whether it’s COVID-19, influenza or the common cold. Yet, many illnesses are at their most contagious before people  even know they’re sick. Research shows that 44 percent of COVID-19 infections were spread several days before the sufferer came down with symptoms.

Now, researchers at Aalto University, Stanford University and Texas A&M, have released a study that models how smartwatches could provide a simple and effective way to dramatically minimise the unwitting spread of disease in pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic people. The research, published in prestigious US journal PNAS Nexus on March 4, reveals a powerful new tool for pandemic management.

‘Unlike during the pandemic, we now have concrete data on how pandemics develop, and how effective different measures are at curbing the spread. Add to this that wearable technology is now extremely effective when it comes to detecting the very early physiological signs of infection, and we are much better prepared,’ says Märt Vesinurm, from Aalto University in Finland. 

How an early ‘ping’ could flatten the curve

Numerous studies have proven the accuracy of wearable devices when it comes to recognising the physiological markers of various illnesses several days before the wearer themself. For example, everyday smartwatches can tell with 88 percent accuracy — from respiration and heart rate, skin temperature and other markers — if you’re coming down with COVID-19. And their accuracy rises to 90 percent accuracy for the flu, Vesinurm says. On average, people reduce social contact between 66-90 percent from the point when they realise they’re sick, even when not in a pandemic situation.

‘Even at the lower end of compliance, if people receive and act on an earlier warning by self-isolating, the impact is significant. Even just a 66-75 percent reduction in social contacts soon after detection by smartwatches — keeping in mind that that’s on a par with what you’d normally do if you had cold symptoms — can lead to a 40-65 percent decrease in disease transmission compared to someone isolating from the onset of symptoms,’ says Vesinurm. 

Notably, the research shows that higher compliance, such as that seen in a pandemic situation, could effectively stop a disease in its tracks. So, could smartwatches help us manage potential H5N1 (avian flu) epidemic? 

‘I see no reason why not,’ says Vesinurm. ‘As we gather more specific data about how different illnesses affect these measurements, there’s no reason we couldn’t distinguish between diseases, from bird flu and HIV to the common cold, especially when used in conjunction with advanced machine learning methods and other data from the user.’ 

Towards smarter pandemic policies

The team of researchers are the first to take real world data from numerous peer-reviewed epidemiological, biological and behavioural studies, drawing it together to mathematically model how infection spreads at a population level. Through this powerful combination of data and tech, Vesinurm foresees a future in which smartwatches change the way we deal with pandemics, at both individual and policy level. 

‘People are used to wearable devices and they’re likely to trust them. While they’re not yet diagnostic, they could help make unpopular approaches like masks, lockdowns and invasive testing more targeted and less of a blunt instrument,’ he says. An early warning from your smartwatch would be the cue to take other actions, like getting a PCR test, wearing a mask, or ‘not visiting your grandma’. The action would depend on the social context at the time, and an individual’s assessment of risk. 

Having this information not only empowers individuals to make choices that keep their loved ones or community safe, but it also gives decision-makers a powerful tool. 

‘It could be that governments find it most cost effective in a pandemic situation to provide every person who wants one with a smartwatch — although of course, this comes with its own ethical considerations,’ says Vesinurm. ‘Either way, with early detection literally at our fingertips, I see a lot of reason to hope.’

 

Equal distribution of wealth is bad for the climate



It's broadly assumed that improving conditions for the world's poor is also good for the climate. New research suggests otherwise.




Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Indra de Soysa 

image: 

If poor people get better conditions, total consumption increases. This also increases emissions, says Professor Indra de Soysa. 

view more 

Credit: Photo: Kjetil Svensen, NTNU




Both the UN and several Nobel laureates have said that political and economic inequality is a driver of high carbon emissions.

The argument is that more democratic societies – where wealth, power and opportunities are more evenly distributed – are better at reducing their emissions.

But that is not true – quite the opposite.

“Some people hold that a rich power elite stands in the way of climate action, and that democracies can more easily implement measures such as banning emissions or raising taxes,” said Professor Indra de Soysa from the Norwegian  University of Science and Technology (NTNU's) Department of Sociology and Political Science.

The idea that democracy is good for the climate is often ideologically driven, but this is based on a faulty premise.

Countries with large inequalities pollute less

It is actually the case that countries with large economic and political disparities have lower emissions than more democratic countries where wealth and power are more evenly distributed.

In practice, a more equal distribution of wealth essentially means that the poorest must receive more.

“If poor people are given better conditions, total consumption increases. As a result, emissions also increase,” explained de Soysa.

The countries with the greatest inequalities are also better at implementing greener energy technologies – not worse, as other theorists have assumed.

Overall wealth is what counts

de Soysa investigated data from approximately 170 countries between 1990 and 2020, where the climate figures were taken from the World Bank. Looking at the results, there is no doubt.

“Climate emissions are lowest in countries with major inequalities in various societal aspects, including economy, opportunities and politics,” he stated.

However, it is not the inequalities themselves that cause this – undemocratic countries often have less money overall, and it is the overall wealth that matters most.

More democracy leads to more wealth and total consumption

In less democratic countries, there are often only a few wealthy individuals, who tend to be extremely wealthy and hold almost all the power.

More democratic countries are generally better at generating more overall wealth, even though this wealth is distributed more evenly among a larger portion of the population. Democratic societies therefore have more wealth in total, and that is not particularly good for the climate.

Increased carbon emissions are closely linked to the total consumption of a society.

“Increased per capita income in a country is clearly and unmistakably linked to higher carbon emissions. The more money a society has, the more it contributes to carbon emissions. More money automatically leads to increased consumption.”

The more money we have, the more things we buy. Perhaps we also eat more, or we consume more products that have a greater environmental impact, such as eating more meat instead of plant-based foods.

“Greater freedom leads to greater economic activity, and this increases both consumption and emissions from production. Greater equality in a society exacerbates this, as more people acquire what others have. Just imagine the day when Indians start consuming as much as the Chinese do,” said de Soysa.

A wicked problem

So what does all of this mean? Should there only be a few rich and powerful people while the rest of us are held back, unable to afford a new mobile phone, a new Tesla, and a wardrobe full of barely worn clothes? What about a holiday in the sun? Or at least enough to meet our needs? For the sake of the climate?

“Reducing inequality and poverty poses a moral and practical dilemma. Providing a more even distribution of income both within and between countries would worsen the climate problems, at least with today’s technological capabilities,” said de Soysa.

This is what researchers call ‘a wicked problem’. Should the majority really be kept in poverty in order to protect the climate? That doesn’t sound very fair.

de Soysa therefore calls for new solutions and ways of thinking that can ensure a more even distribution and also protect the climate – and new technology is undoubtedly the most comfortable solution.

“Aside from reducing consumption, which can happen as a result of war, pandemics, stock market crashes, and so on, technological changes are the only solution I can see,” said de Soysa.

However, even technological solutions can be extremely slow to develop and implement, and they will create both winners and losers.

Reference: Indra de Soysa, Green with envy? The effects of inequality and equity within and across social groups on greenhouse gas emissions, 1990–2020, World Development, Volume 188, 2025, 106885, ISSN 0305-750X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106885

 

Generative AI is upending freelance work – even top performers aren’t safe



New research reveals freelancer job losses and pay cuts linked to AI tools




Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences





New INFORMS Organization Science Study Key Takeaways:

  • Freelancers Face Job Losses and Income Decreases: The rise of generative AI tools like ChatGPT is reshaping the labor market, reducing opportunities and earnings for freelance workers.
  • Top Performers are Hit Hardest: High-earning freelancers experience the steepest declines, with greater drops in both job prospects and pay compared to lower-performing peers.
  • AI Undermines Traditional Competitive Advantages: Skilled workers who once relied on expertise and reputation now find themselves competing with AI-driven tools that perform tasks faster and cheaper.

BALTIMORE, MD, March 4, 2025 – A groundbreaking study has uncovered a startling reality: generative AI tools like ChatGPT are already reshaping the freelance job market, slashing employment opportunities and pay for workers across all skill levels. Even top freelancers – those with the strongest track records – are suffering the greatest setbacks.

Published in the INFORMS journal Organization Science, the research provides some of the first hard evidence of AI’s immediate impact on employment.

“Surprisingly, top-performing freelancers are seeing the largest setbacks. For every 1% increase in a freelancer’s past earnings, they experience an additional 0.5% drop in job opportunities and a 1.7% decrease in monthly income following the introduction of AI technologies,” says Xiang Hui, one of the study’s authors and a professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

A Market Disrupted

The study, “The Short-Term Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Employment: Evidence from an Online Labor Market,” challenges assumptions about AI’s impact on labor markets. Although AI is often seen as a threat to lower-skilled jobs, the findings show that its disruption extends to high performers as well.

“We’re seeing a dramatic shift in the freelance labor market. Generative AI isn’t just affecting lowest-skilled workers – it’s disrupting the competitive advantage of even the best workers. High-quality freelancers, who typically thrive in tough markets, are losing out more than anyone else,” says Hui.

Oren Reshef, also from Washington University, emphasized that AI’s rise is shifting traditional labor dynamics. “Skilled freelancers, who have traditionally relied on their expertise and reputation, are now competing against advanced algorithms that perform tasks faster and cheaper.”

The Future of Work in an AI-Driven Economy

These findings raise urgent concerns for businesses, policymakers and workers. With AI adoption accelerating, the results suggest the need for immediate discussions about how to mitigate the job losses and income instability triggered by AI disruption.

“Generative AI is changing the rules of the game,” continued Reshef. “It’s not just reducing opportunities for less-skilled workers; it’s cutting into the core of what has always made top performers successful. This technology forces us to rethink how workers compete and how we support them in an AI-driven economy.”

The study’s findings highlight the need for businesses and policymakers to address the evolving impact of AI on digital labor, developing strategies to safeguard workers from its unintended consequences.

 

Link to full study.

 

About INFORMS and Organization Science
INFORMS is the world’s largest association for professionals and students in operations research, AI, analytics, data science and related disciplines, serving as a global authority in advancing cutting-edge practices and fostering an interdisciplinary community of innovation.  Organization Science, a leading INFORMS journal, publishes innovative research on strategy, management and organizational theory. INFORMS empowers its community to enhance organizational performance and drive data-driven decision-making through its journals and resources. Learn more at www.informs.org or @informs.

###


Subscribe and stay up to date on the latest from INFORMS. 

Sign Up For Email Updates

 

The first Bronze Age settlement in the Maghreb



UB researcher leads discovery of great significance for the history of Africa and the Mediterranean


.


University of Barcelona

The first Bronze Age settlement in the Maghreb 

image: 

Kach Kouch is located ten kilometres from the present-day coast, near the Strait of Gibraltar, and thirty kilometres southeast of Tétouan. 

view more 

Credit: Hamza Benattia Melgarejo ( University of Barcelona)





Most Bronze Age settlements have been documented in European territory. Despite its geographical proximity, the Maghreb has always been absent from these historical narratives, erroneously characterized as an ‘empty land’ until the arrival of the Phoenicians around 800 BC. Now, a research study led by Hamza Benattia Melgarejo ( University of Barcelona) has uncovered the first Bronze Age settlement in this geographical area, predating the Phoenician period. This discovery is of great significance for the history of Africa and the Mediterranean. 

 

According to the results published in Antiquity, excavations at Kach Kouch, located in northwest Morocco, reveal a human occupation datable to between 2200 and 600 BC. This would show that it would be the earliest site of this chronology in Mediterranean Africa, except for Egypt. 

The international research team, led by Hamza Benattia Melgarejo, PhD student at the UB’s Faculty of Geography and History and member of the UB’s Classical and Protohistoric Archaeology Research Group, has been working on the prehistoric settlement of Kach Kouch, which extends over an area of approximately one hectare near the Lau River. It is located ten kilometres from the present-day coast, near the Strait of Gibraltar, and thirty kilometres southeast of Tétouan. 

Excavations have revealed different phases of occupation. The first, from 2200-2000 BC, is poorly represented but significant. The evidence suggests an initial contemporary occupation in the transition from the Bronze Age to neighbouring Iberia. 

The second phase, 1300-900 BC, is a vibrant period in the history of the settlement. A stable agricultural community was established at Kach Kouch and is the first definitive evidence of sedentary life before the Phoenician presence in the Maghreb. Wooden mud-brick buildings, rock-cut silos and grinding stones reveal a thriving agricultural economy based on crops such as barley and wheat, supplemented by sheep, goats and cattle. 

A third phase, extending from 800 to 600 BC, demonstrates the flexibility and adaptability of the inhabitants of Kach Kouch. During this period, several cultural innovations from the eastern Mediterranean were introduced, such as wheel-thrown pottery, iron tools and new architectural traditions using stone. This mix of local and foreign practices illustrates how the community actively participated in Mediterranean exchange networks.

“Kach Kouch is one of the first well-documented examples of continuous settlement in the Maghreb and tells a very different story from the one that has existed for a long time: it shows the history of dynamic local communities that were far from isolated”, says Benattia. “The excavations at this site are another step towards correcting these historical biases and reveal that the Maghreb was an active participant in the social, cultural and economic networks of the Mediterranean”, says the UB researcher. 

  

According to the results, excavations at Kach Kouch, located in northwest Morocco, reveal a human occupation datable to between 2200 and 600 BC.

Excavations have revealed different phases of occupation.

Credit

Hamza Benattia Melgarejo ( University of Barcelona)