Thursday, April 17, 2025

Unspoken Oppression – The Twin Hells of School and Work

April 16, 2025
FacebookTwitter

Image by Annie Spratt.

“They schools can’t teach us shit

my people need freedom

we tryin to get all we can get”

-Dead Prez, They Schools

I was in the fourth grade the first time someone called me “cynical.” It came from an adult—a teacher at that. I’ve long forgotten whatever it was I could have said to garner such a reaction from someone who was several times my age, but that’s really beside the point, which is this: who the hell would say such a thing to a young child? And why?

I had no idea what the word meant, so I looked it up. I still didn’t understand. All that my child’s mind understood was that I’d transgressed in some way—I had disappointed a grown-up. It hurt my feelings, but it didn’t stop me from continuing to think my own thoughts in my own way. I’d like to pat that kid on the back for his resiliency in the face of obnoxiousness and cruelty.

“Pessimistic” is another word that people have often lobbed at me like a rotten tomato since I was young. At some point I decided these words were simply thoughtless insults that people brandished whenever I said something they didn’t like. If anything, it made me more determined to be myself, regardless of cost or consequences. Give that kid another pat on the back.

I find it instructive that the kind of adults who would call a child cynical are the same ones who are most devoted to the idea that the proper way to rear children is to force them to sit at a desk, doing pointless, repetitive tasks, for the best hours of the day, five days a week, nine months a year—conditioning them to obedience, fractured thinking, emotional dependency on authority, and boredom.

Anyone who has plodded through this country’s demented compulsory schooling system knows perfectly well that it’s a nightmarish violation of the human spirit. Yet most of us grow up and regard it as unavoidable, like it was gravity. We fail to imagine or pursue any alternatives. Even worse, we have kids of our own and ship them off to these chambers of low-grade torture, despite our own hellish experiences there. What’s more cynical than that?

The most naive among us are convinced that we’re doing our kids some kind of favor by sending them to school, and perhaps such ignorance can be forgiven. Other folks know through hard experience that lack of schooling credentials can doom children to a lifetime of menial labor or worse.

At best, a skillful performance at jumping through academic hoops can provide options and opportunities that we otherwise wouldn’t have… or at least, that’s how my dad sold me on completing college, when, during my first year, riddled with frustration and despair, I dearly longed to drop out and find somethinganything else that might make my life worth living.

His words made sense at the time. These days I’m not so sure.

It’s true that college gave me certain opportunities. I took classes in Women’s Studies and Black Studies, struggled through a year of Japanese, learned Mandarin, and traveled to China for a summer of studying abroad. I learned that I hate computer programming with a passion (a class that concluded with the only final exam I ever cried over). I met my first Socialists™ and Activists™, dated women from foreign cultures, and went to enough frat parties to discover how much they suck. I earned my Bachelor’s degree—a prerequisite for a whole lot of jobs I have never wanted.

I think those are all great experiences for a young person to have. However, I also think that if given the necessary support and encouragement in my intellectual curiosities throughout my youth, and freed from the colonization of schooling, there is no reason I could not have had those experiences on my own… without having had to suffer through almost twenty years of institutionalization. Who knows what I might have achieved?

But who could possibly have provided such support and encouragement? My parents were busy working. Isolated in a suburban nuclear family, I had no other relatives nearby, and even if I would have, they would likewise have been busy working. I was already in college before I even heard the term homeschooling.

Some months ago I was driving out to attend a sweat-lodge ceremony with one of my lodge brothers. It has become part of the ritual for us to have political debates during the several hours we spend in the car traveling to and from ceremony. He’s an urban leftist of the Chicano/Ethnic Studies variety, and I’m an unrepentant pirate anarchist savage. Whether we agree or disagree on a given point, our worldviews—our fundamental beliefs as to what life is and should be aboutdiffer all the way down to the bedrock.

Both of us are in our mid-to-late forties. We’re both musicians. We share a tricksterish sense of humor. We both proudly and purposely defy the mandates of Babylon Masculinity by being nurturing, compassionate, and generous. We both participate in indigenous ceremonies. We even live in the same section of East Oakland.

The similarities end there.

I grew up in the semi-rural margins of the Bay Area. He’s from the San Francisco barrio. His parents were first generation immigrants, mine were post-WWII escapees of poverty. He was a teenage criminal, I was a straight-A student. He has spent his life surrounded by family and community; I was more or less raised by television and comic books. He’s very social and loves to be around other people; I generally prefer my own company and spend a great deal of time alone. I stay up late reading books, he loses sleep watching YouTube (on a smartphone, of course).

I believe that industrial civilization is a cosmic crime; he’s never questioned it. I have zero trust or loyalty for any bureaucratic institution; he’s spent most of his adult life working for non-profits and unions. I am enthusiastically child-free, have never married, and in fact I have spent very little time even being monogamous; he’s been married, divorced, shares custody of two young daughters, and continues to believe that one day he’ll find his True Love. He has a Career™ and works fifty-plus hours a week, sometimes six days a week; I work two days a week as a thug-for-hire, teach a few kungfu classes, and spend most of my remaining time drinking, smoking, writing, fucking, having conversations, making art, and lounging around.

I may suffer from any number of emotional maladies, but guilt is not one of them. He is riddled with it; he has a martyr’s conviction that we should all be Saving the World, while I think it’s far, far too late for that. He thinks science & technology will solve the problems that science & technology have created, a notion I find patently absurd. He likes to talk about the importance of “democracy”; I like to stink up the room by pointing out that democracy was invented by a society that, at the pinnacle of its dubious glory, had a slave-to-free-man ratio of 3 to 1.

During our most recent debate, my lodge brother initiated himself into the well-populated cabal of people who have described my views as “pessimistic.” As an adult I still don’t understand what these folks mean any better than I did as a child. I think about it like this: if the weather forecast on Monday says it’s going to be sunny through Friday, and the weather remains sunny through Thursday, but on Thursday night I’m complaining about how it’ll probably rain the next day… that’s pessimism.

On the other hand, if I point out that the driver-less, brake-less, inescapable train rocketing toward the cliff is probably going to kill all of its passengers, that ain’t pessimism, it’s a reasonable assessment of the facts at hand! Anyone who’s devoted any time at all to researching the consequences of industrial civilization has most definitely seen the cliff; if they’ve put serious time in, they’ve probably seen the train, too. They might have even tried to find a way off it (spoiler alert: there’s no way off).

During the same conversation, my lodge brother also dropped a quote on me that I’ve heard many times (usually from corny leftists) but could not immediately identify; I later found out it was from Malcolm X: “We are not responsible for our oppression, but we are responsible for our liberation.”

Brother Malcolm is always good for a saucy line, but here, as usual, it’s taken way out of context, particularly historical context. Mister X was murdered long before the chickens started coming home to roost—the crisis of global warming, the cybernetic mind control, the forever wars, the resurgent fascism, the utter triumph of global capitalism and industrial militarism.

As a writer and a poet, I love and respect language, words, and depth of meaning. I hate platitudes; I hate mindlessly parroted political jargon even more. So whenever someone bops me with some lexicon like they just won the conversation, it’s time for me to play Naughty Student, hand up in the back of the room—excuse me, sir; define oppression; define liberation. Define responsible.

In my view, the most common and unacknowledged forms of immediate, everyday oppression are the twin hells of School & Work. The first was always intended by its progenitors as training for the second; some asshole authority figure tells you what to do all day, and the most important lesson you learn is: do it or else. Coerced by law, and by the need for parents to have somewhere to park their kids during the workday, we go to school. Coerced by the necessity of money for survival, we work… if we’re lucky. Otherwise, we end up in society’s trash can, living on the street or in prison.

Coercion and domination wound the spirit and retard the mind; they humiliate us, preempting or crushing our self-respect. School & Work are tools of the powerful few to exploit the many—not only through the profits these tools generate, but also by their effectiveness at producing a compliant, obedient population of dimwitted consumers—a drone class, rendered incapable of critical or imaginative thought, ignorant, short of memory and attention spans, and, these days, hopelessly addicted to screens.

How could such a population even imagine liberation, let alone achieve it?

Now that I’m swimming through the ocean of aches, pains, and melancholy that is middle-age, I’ve been reflecting on the child I was, and on how he turned into me. I’ve realized that from my earliest years, the one thing I’ve desired more than anything else is for my time to belong to me. Not to a teacher. Not to a boss. Certainly not to an institution (Outlaw Rule Number One: get away with it).

In my early twenties, thanks to the writings of a few anarchist cranks and belligerent savages, I discovered that I was not alone in my desire, and that it was possible to achieve. They gave me knowledge, wisdom, and concepts to frame my own resistance, my liberation. It took a while, but I finally achieved this desire; the majority of my time is now my own. My freedom may be small and personal, but it’s mine, and it works—I will keep and defend it by any means necessary.

There is no escape from the Machine… but that doesn’t mean we have to live entirely on its terms.

I’ve been bored with refuting the silly authoritarian bullshit of wannabe revolutionaries and Marx-jockeys for twenty years now, but having a laugh at their expense never gets old. Someday I’ll ask my lodge brother what his vision of an ideal society is, for the sole purpose of ridiculing it later—whatever his response is, it’s guaranteed to provide me with an entertaining anecdote to tell my elderly, retired parents.

After spending most of their lives selling their time for the profit of others, I’d say they’ve earned the laughs.

Malik Diamond is a hip hop artistcartoonistauthor, educator, and martial arts instructor. Born and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area, he is the descendant of kidnapped Africans, conquered Natives, and rural laborers of the Scots-Irish, Swiss, and German varieties. He currently lives in Oakland, California, with two brown humans and a white cat. E-mail: malikdiamond (at) hotmail (dot) com

The Deafening Silence: Arab Complicity and the Normalization of Evil in Gaza




 April 16, 2025
FacebookTwitter

Image by Levi Meir Clancy.

The world is witnessing an unconscionable silence as Israel, an occupying power, imposes a total food blockade on Gaza—an act of collective punishment against a captive civilian population. As famine tightens its grip and American-made bombs rain from the sky, global leaders stand by—paralyzed, indifferent, or willfully complicit—while Israel renders Gaza uninhabitable.

Earlier this week, Israel targeted the only functioning medical facility serving over a million people in northern Gaza. Al Ahli Baptist Hospital was given just 20 minutes—in the dead of night—to evacuate hundreds of patients and wounded civilians. This second attack on the medical facility was enabled by then-U.S. President Joe Biden’s exoneration of Israel for its earlier massacre targeting the same hospital in October 2023—an assault that killed over 500 civilians sheltering outside its grounds.

But this was not an isolated attack. Hospitals, medical facilities, ambulances, and first responders have been systematically and relentlessly targeted in Gaza as in no other war in modern memory. Doctors have been kidnapped or killed while performing surgeries. Ambulances bombed mid-rescue. Entire medical complexes reduced to rubble while filled with patients, newborns, and the wounded. This is not collateral damage—it is a campaign of annihilation against the very institutions meant to save lives. In Gaza, saving lives has become a death sentence.

The United Nations, constrained by the U.S. veto power, has failed to pass a resolution demanding an end to what many increasingly recognize as genocide. Meanwhile, the United States—self-styled as a beacon of human rights—actively abets these atrocities. It supplies Israel with massive bombs, including 2,000-pound munitions, enabling their use in densely populated areas. This is not merely a moral failing; it is a flagrant violation of both U.S. and international laws governing military aid.

Much of this impunity stems from the legacy of Donald Trump emboldened Israel through a series of reckless, one-sided decisions: recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, slashing humanitarian aid to Palestinians, and endorsing illegal Jewish-only colonies on stolen Palestinian land. Trump gave Israel carte blanche to act without fear of accountability. His abject support signaled that no matter how flagrant the violations, there would be no consequences—only more weapons, more diplomatic protection, and deeper impunity.

Today, Israel carries out its campaign of destruction while invoking Trump’s so-called “vision” for Gaza—an evil blueprint of ethnic cleansing. This vision has become a license of an Israeli roadmap for dispossession, displacement, and death.

This has indulged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s relentless appetite for Palestinian land—prolong the suffering of Israeli captives, Palestinian prisoners, and the people of Gaza. His refusal to pursue a meaningful ceasefire or prisoner exchange is a calculated political maneuver. The ongoing war serves his far-right racist coalition, distracts from his legal troubles, and consolidates his grip on power while advancing an expansionist agenda. In the process, Gaza has become what can only be described as a starvation death camp—where civilians are punished collectively, denied food, water, medicine, and even hope.

Meanwhile, in the occupied West Bank, Israeli military raids and settler mobs have escalated dramatically. Entire communities are being uprooted and terrorized with impunity. Yet, the Palestinian Authority (PA)—the supposed protector of Palestinians—has shown paralyzing impotence. Rather than confronting Israeli aggression or protecting its people, the PA functions as a subcontractor for the occupation, policing its own population while Israeli forces and armed settlers freely brutalize civilians. Its failure to act has not only eroded its legitimacy but made it complicit in the very oppression it claims to oppose.

And still, the international community looks away.

But perhaps the most disgraceful silence comes not from Washington or Brussels—but from Arab capitals. This is not mere neglect or indifference. It is betrayal—a betrayal rooted in cowardice, authoritarianism, and self-preservation at the expense of justice.

The regimes in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and others have become accessories to genocide and complicit in the siege on Gaza. Their silence, their closed borders, their collaboration and normalization with Israel—all point to a level of complicity that history will neither forget nor forgive. As Gaza’s children starve and entire families are buried beneath rubble, Arab leaders ingurgitate in palaces, and issue timid statements devoid of conviction, or consequence.

It is a painful irony that while protests erupt in cities like London, Paris, and New York, there is near-total silence in Cairo, Riyadh, Amman, and Abu Dhabi. The moral clarity of Western citizens who take to the streets in solidarity with the Palestinians underscores the betrayal of those who claim religious, linguistic, and cultural kinship with them. But the failure is not only at the top. Public apathy, and resignation in many Arab and Muslim societies have enabled this silence—allowing Israel to persist in its crimes. A people conditioned to accept humiliation cannot demand justice.

The evil of occupation and military aggression is sustained not only through bombs and blockades but through the slow erosion of courage and moral standards. Atrocities once shocking now pass as routine. The world becomes numb. The killing of children, the destruction of homes, and the denial of basic necessities no longer elicit outrage. The question becomes not how such acts are tolerated, but when genocide becomes mere statistics—counting whether more or fewer people were killed today compared to yesterday.

This normalization turns ordinary people into complicit actors—bureaucrats who process arms shipments, journalists who frame one-sided narratives, citizens who choose silence over dissent. All become part of a system that sustains injustice.

A genocide is unfolding in real time, and the silence is not just deafening—it is damning. It is time for the people in Arab and Muslim capitals to at least join the protestors in Western cities and break this silence. To speak with moral clarity. To meet the demands of the moment. And to reject the normalization of evil in Gaza.

Jamal Kanj is the author of Children of Catastrophe: Journey from a Palestinian Refugee Camp to America, and other books. He writes frequently on Arab world issues for various national and international commentaries


The Mask Has Fallen: Gaza and the Myth of

Western Morality


April 15, 2025
Facebook

Image by Mohammed Ibrahim.

For decades, the world has been fed a carefully constructed image of the West: a beacon of freedom, justice, and human rights. The United States—self-proclaimed leader of the free world—has long presented itself as the global guardian of democracy. The European Union echoes these sentiments, proudly championing international law and humanitarian values. And the United Nations? It’s supposedly the impartial referee, the peacekeeper, the voice of the voiceless.

But when Gaza bleeds, the mask falls.

What we’ve seen in Gaza during the war is not just a humanitarian catastrophe—it’s a moral collapse of the very systems that have long claimed to defend justice. This is not about political alignment or national interests. This is about the horrifying disconnect between the West’s rhetoric and its actions, between the principles etched into human rights charters and the blood drying on the rubble of bombed-out neighborhoods.

A Deafening Silence from the “Moral Superpowers”

When hundreds of Palestinian children are killed, entire families wiped out in airstrikes, and journalists and aid workers targeted in what seems like strategic precision, the Western world offers little more than carefully-worded statements that avoid accountability.

The United States, in particular, continues to provide not only diplomatic cover but also financial and military support to Israel—despite mounting evidence of war crimes. While American leaders preach to the world about human rights abuses in other countries, they refuse to call out the slaughter in Gaza for what it is. Instead, they justify it under the banner of “self-defense,” a term that loses meaning when it becomes a license for indiscriminate bombing.

Europe’s Hypocrisy

Europe, too, has fallen woefully short. Countries that have been quick to condemn Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, and rightfully so, suddenly grow mute when confronted with the reality in Gaza. The moral outrage that poured onto the streets in support of Ukraine is conspicuously absent. Double standards are laid bare: some lives are worthy of grief and solidarity, others are not.

The UN’s Powerlessness—or Complicity?

The United Nations, meanwhile, has become a tragic symbol of ineffectiveness. Statements are issued, votes are cast, but the slaughter continues. The Security Council, paralyzed by veto powers and political alliances, can offer no real protection. Gaza’s cries echo in the UN chamber only to be drowned out by bureaucracy and geopolitical games.

The same institution that helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has stood by, seemingly helpless, as those very rights are shredded in real-time.

Gaza Has Exposed the Lie

The war in Gaza has stripped away the polished PR campaigns and moral posturing of Western powers. What remains is an uncomfortable truth: that the West’s commitment to human rights is often conditional, selective, and deeply politicized. It is a currency spent on allies, withheld from those deemed expendable. The suffering of the Palestinian people has revealed that, for many of these so-called “civilized” societies, human rights are not a universal principle, but a strategic tool.

Why the Disappointment Cuts Deep

The betrayal hits harder because it wasn’t supposed to be this way. Many believed in the ideals of freedom, justice, and equality not just as slogans, but as standards. To see those ideals weaponized or discarded when inconvenient isn’t just disillusioning—it’s devastating.

In Gaza, we are not just witnessing a humanitarian crisis. We are watching the moral fabric of international institutions unravel. The West, the UN, the entire system built to uphold human dignity—they’ve failed. Worse, they’ve revealed that perhaps they were never truly committed to those values when it mattered most.

When the dust finally settles, the question will remain: who stood on the side of humanity, and who stood behind empty words?

Zarifah Al-Bash is a writer and social commentator based in Doha, Qatar. She focuses on issues of justice, global politics, and the intersection of media narratives and human rights.