Thursday, April 17, 2025

Los Angeles Teachers’ Union Defends Students From Trump’s Anti-Migrant Crackdown

Source: TruthOut

On April 7, federal agents from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attempted to enter two elementary schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). According to LAUSD Superintendent Alberto Carvalho, the agents were trying to contact five students who they alleged entered the U.S. without documentation, and they lied to school officials by claiming that the students’ families gave them permission to contact the students. (“Any assertions that officers lied are false,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Truthout in a statement.)

It was the first attempt by federal agents to enter a Los Angeles public school during Donald Trump’s intensifying assault on immigrants. The agents were turned away by school administrators, but the event left some educators rattled and came amid growing fears within L.A.’s immigrant community about the safety of attending schools.

At the same time, students and communities are putting up strong resistance to the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant agenda, and a key backbone of this resistance is coming from United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA), the city’s mighty union of educators.

Across the U.S., from Chicago to the Twin Cities, teachers and their unions are stepping up to protect and defend immigrant students and their communities. This organizing isn’t new, but urgency is growing with Trump’s extremist policies. Leading the way are left-led teacher unions with mobilized rank-and-file bases and “common good” strategies that wield union bargaining toward social justice for communities, including defending immigrant rights.

UTLA is one of those unions. Maria Miranda was a LAUSD classroom teacher for 21 years and a community school coordinator for two years before becoming UTLA’s elementary vice president and the point officer on the union’s immigration justice work. Truthout spoke with Miranda about UTLA’s defense of immigrant students and immigrant communities.

Derek Seidman: To start, can you discuss how you’re feeling in this moment?

Maria Miranda: Fear is not new for us. I grew up as an undocumented student in LAUSD. I lived the reality of having to hide when we didn’t know who was knocking at the door. I see that happening now with our students. They are very afraid to walk to school or to be home alone. They are afraid that their parents are at risk.

We’re providing information through new structures that we have built within UTLA. We have what we call our immigrant justice area team leads who are trained in rapid response. They are asked to notify myself and the staff here at UTLA whenever there is an ICE sighting reported at a school site. We distribute information to area meetings to inform different areas and chapter leaders at every site.

We also have Know Your Rights trainings for any member who wishes to attend. We have  informational sheets for our members to share among each other so that they can meet and discuss. We’ve tried to engage our members with materials and information so that everyone is as informed as possible.

How are you working with families and students directly?

We’re making sure that our members know what resources are available for families. We had a family preparedness training so that educators can provide guidance to families who might need it, such as help with a caregiver affidavit. We’ve opened up our Know Your Rights and family preparedness trainings to the community so that parents and community members could join. We have pamphlets that we leaflet to parents at school sites. For the first time, parents are taking multiple copies with them to share with their family members, friends and neighbors.

We also had social emotional training led by two principal social workers who shared with educators what can be done to support the needs of our students who are going through this very difficult moment. We’ve had educators share classroom lessons with secondary and elementary school teachers on how they can discuss the issues within the school setting, because students do ask. When I was in the kindergarten classroom, the little ones would bring up concerns. We want our educators to know how to address some of these issues that are age appropriate for the children.

The older students also need resources, because we do have unaccompanied minors in our school sites who have different types of status and who need resources at school sites. We have a visual campaign with posters and buttons to tell students they are welcomed here.

Can you talk about UTLA’s work with community and labor groups?

We have neighborhood walks where we distribute door hangers. Every school site is going out and leaving these if the families are not home. We already distributed red cards to our members, and we also have red cards in many different languages available for the community. All of our items are on our union website. We are working very closely with nonprofit organizations such as CarecenCHIRLARescateKIWACLUECalifornia Immigrant Policy Center, and a few other groups, and labor partners like SEIU 721SEIU USWW and SEIU 2015.

Labor partners are coming together to support our immigrant community here in Los Angeles. We all meet very regularly. UTLA is part of the leadership group of the different labor partners and community organizations that come together, and we’re also part of the rapid response team. We are the leads on this work in the San Fernando Valley and in the southeast cities.

If there is an ICE sighting, we show up and confirm that it’s happening, and we provide Know Your Rights services to impacted folks in the area. Then we notify the rapid response network so that the legal side can provide services for families. CHIRLA has done a great job coordinating a lot of this work, and we’re very happy to have our members assist them to make sure that the rapid response network is successful.

Why is it important for labor unions like UTLA to be doing this work?

I think it’s two things. We care about the community and we love the families that we serve. I myself taught in the same community where I grew up. We see ourselves in the students and the parents. We value our immigrant community and understand the struggles they’ve endured leaving their whole life behind to start anew and find a better future for themselves and their children.

As a union, we also know that this is an attack on public education. It’s an attack on unions. They are trying to dismantle the Department of Education. They are attacking our public education system, which is supposed to be accessible to any person, regardless of immigration status. If they succeed, they will be destroying something that has been beneficial to communities for many years. As educators, we cannot stand by and do nothing.

We know that if they instill enough fear in our community, folks will leave. Our schools will lose enrollment and funding and resources with that. And of course, losing students means losing teachers, and losing teachers means losing schools. The whole system will just crumble. We do not want our schools to be privatized.

What are the most important things you’ve learned doing this organizing?

We need to continue talking to our communities so that we are not desensitized to all this. We can’t begin to see all this pain as normal, because then there will be no action against it. The more we hear these stories, the more we have to fight for each other.

As union leaders, we have to communicate with the district and to continue trying to collaborate with them, even if the district shuts its door. We have to reach out to the community and work with the immigrant rights groups doing the work that have expertise from advocating for immigrant rights for many years.

Everyone needs to know that there is a place for them in this work. Even if you’re new, you can learn and jump into advocacy. You can stand up and say you’re a DACA [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals] recipient, or you’re mixed-status, or you’ve suffered family separation, and this is what it did to us. We need things like that so that we constantly see that this is a reality for our community

With today’s challenges, what keeps you motivated?

I recently got a shirt that says “We Migrate Because We Refuse to Die.” That’s reality for many people. The majority of folks who are here are here because they have to be. My love of my students and their families keeps me going. Having been an undocumented student myself, and now, as an adult, seeing how proud my parents are to see their dream being realized by my work — that keeps me going.

I’m inspired that our union is fighting and staying strong. We put ourselves on the line with our Bargaining for the Common Good demands. In 2019, we won common good demands that supported our community and our families. In 2023, we saw our MOU [memorandum of understanding] on immigrant student support, and now we have this as a new article in our  bargaining proposal. (Editor’s note: this new article contains proposals declaring LAUSD schools as sanctuary spaces, a LAUSD/UTLA District Immigrant Support Committee, efforts to expand funding for services for immigrant families and partnerships with legal organizations, mandatory training for all staff and administrators on LAUSD Sanctuary Schools Policy, support for Know Your Rights Trainings, free meeting space on school campuses for immigrant rights organizations, support for employees or students who need immigration-related leaves or absences, and more.)

All this work strengthens our contract and strengthens our schools. I think that’s what gives me hope — that we’re actually making a difference. We’re codifying things. We’re letting families know that educators have a place in their community, not just the classroom, and that families’ voices are being heard when we’re at the bargaining table.

Don’t get me wrong. After the election in November, I had a few days where I shut my door. I was processing. But after those tough couple of weeks, I’ve been super focused. What are we going to do? How do we give our families hope? How do we ensure that they know that there are strong unions supporting them?

We need to talk to people about what’s happening, including family members; people who are not typically active and political really need to be getting involved, because we need a movement. We need people out in the streets to make sure that folks are not robbed of their rights. We need to stand up for each other and stand up for the democracy of this country.

Progressives Push for Emergency DNC Meeting to Confront ‘Dictatorial’ Trump

Source: Common Dreams

Chuck Schumer and Hakeen Jefferies

“Step by step, in effect, the regime is proceeding to shred the Constitution of the United States,” said the national director of RootsAction. “This is no time for Democratic Party business as usual.”

A pair of grassroots progressive organizations launched a petition on Wednesday imploring the Democratic National Committee to call an emergency meeting to confront the dire threat posed by President Donald Trump’s administration, which has trampled laws, disregarded  basic constitutional rights, and ignored court rulings as it attempts to impose its far-right agenda on the U.S.

The petition, spearheaded by Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) and RootsAction, states that the Democratic Party “has failed to confront the urgency of this perilous moment for the future of the United States, as reflected in recent public opinion polls.”

“For the sake of the future, we insist that the Democratic National Committee should convene an emergency meeting of all its members—fully open to the public—as soon as possible. Waiting until the next regular meeting in late summer would be irresponsible and unacceptable,” the petition continues. “Business as usual must give way to truly bold action that mobilizes against the autocracy that Donald TrumpElon Musk, and their cronies are further entrenching every day. The predatory, extreme, and dictatorial actions of the Trump administration call for an all-out commensurate response, which so far has been terribly lacking from the Democratic Party.”

“Our urgent message to the DNC is—wake up, this is an emergency.”

The petition drive comes amid mounting evidence that the Democratic base is growing increasingly disaffected with the party leadership, particularly in the wake of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-N.Y.) surrender last month on a Republican-authored government funding package.

One survey conducted earlier this month found that 72% of Democratic voters support politicians like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) “who are calling on Democrats to adopt a more aggressive stance towards Trump and his administration.” In recent weeks, the progressive duo has drawn massive crowds on its “Fight Oligarchy” tour, which has included stops in deep-red states.

Just 28% of Democratic voters said they prefer “moderate Democrats” over progressives like Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez.

Alan Minsky, PDA’s executive director, said Wednesday that “millions upon millions of Americans are doubly appalled.”

“They not only are watching the Trump administration stage a coup, but they also feel the political opposition is not doing enough to protect our democratic republic,” said Minsky. “We call upon the DNC to hold an emergency meeting so that, like a truly democratic opposition, it can draw upon the idealism of the American people to defend all that is great about our society.”

The DNC is currently led by former Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party Chair Ken Martin, who has vocally decried Trump’s lawlessness and launched a “People’s Cabinet” aimed at countering the Trump administration’s right-wing policy agenda and misinformation.

“Donald Trump’s disregard for the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and human decency shows the terrifying lengths he will go to fulfill his fantasy of becoming a ‘ dictator on day one,'” Martin said Tuesday in response to the president’s refusal to bring home a wrongly deported Maryland resident. “Now, Trump is threatening to round up American citizens and ship them to foreign prisons without due process.”

“This is an all-out assault on our Constitution and our fundamental rights,” Martin added, “and we must fight back.”

One way for the DNC to fight back, according to PDA and RootsAction, would be for the Democratic governing body to convene an emergency meeting to make clear that the party intends to respond accordingly to the authoritarian Trump threat.

“The daily avalanches of massive abuses and lawless actions by the Trump administration have created what amounts to a state of emergency,” said Norman Solomon, national director of RootsAction. “Step by step, in effect, the regime is proceeding to shred the Constitution of the United States. This is no time for Democratic Party business as usual. Our urgent message to the DNC is—wake up, this is an emergency.”

Against Militarization: Scientists Unite in Opposition to EU Rearmament
April 17, 2025
Source: International Union Of Scientists



Scientists are uniting to voice against the recent proposal to rearm the European Union. They have released “Scientists against rearmament – A manifesto” and are calling on scientists, engineers, medical professionals, mathematicians, scholars, and the broader science community to support their stance.

Here is the link to the manifesto for endorsement.
Scientists against rearmament – A manifesto

by Carlo Rovelli, Flavio Del Santo, and Francesca Vidotto

9 March 2025

As scientists – many of us involved in fields on which military technology is developed – as intellectuals, as citizens aware of the current global risks, we believe that today it is the moral and civic obligation of any person of good will to raise their voice against the call for a European militarization, and urge dialogue, tolerance, and diplomacy. Abrupt militarization does not preserve peace; it leads to war.

Our political leaders say they are ready to fight to defend alleged Western values they deem at stake; are they ready to defend the universal value of human life? Conflicts around the world are on the rise. According to the United Nations (2023), one-quarter of humanity lives in areas affected by armed conflict. The war between Russia and Ukraine, subsidized by NATO countries with the justification of ‘defending principles’, is leaving behind an estimated one million casualties. The risk of genocide of Palestinians by the Israeli army backed by the global West has been recognized by the International Court of Justice. Brutal wars are unfolding in Africa, such as in Sudan, or in the Democratic Republic of Congo, fueled by interests in Africa’s mineral resources. The “Doomsday Clock of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists”, which quantifies the risks of a nuclear global catastrophe, never recorded a risk as high as today.

Scared by the Russian attack on Ukraine and by the recent repositioning of the United States, Europe feels sidelined and fears that its peace and prosperity could be at risks. Politicians are reacting in a short-sighted manner with a call to mobilize, on a continental scale, a colossal amount of resources to produce more tools of death and destruction. On 4 March 2025, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, released the “ReArm Europe Plan”, stating that “Europe is ready and able to act with the speed and ambition that is needed. […] We are in an era of rearmament. And Europe is ready to massively boost its defense spending.” The military industry, which has vast resources and powerful influence on politicians and the media, blows on the fire of an openly belligerent narrative. The “fear of Russia” is stirred up as a bogeyman, conveniently ignoring that Russia has a GDP lower than Italy alone. Politicians say, completely unwarrantedly, that Russia has expansionist aims towards Europe, posing a threat to Berlin, Paris and Warsaw, when it has just shown of not been even capable of taking its former satellite, Kiev. War propaganda is always nourished by instigating exaggerated fear. With diplomacy, Europe can go back to its peaceful coexistence and collaboration with Russia that the cursed Ukrainian affair has disrupted.

The idea that peace depends on overpowering the other sides leads only to escalation, and escalation leads to war. The Cold War did not become a ‘hot’ war and wise politicians from both sides were able to overcome their strong ideological divergences and their respective “questions of principle” and agree on a dramatic balanced reduction of their respective nuclear armaments. The START nuclear treaties between the USA and the Soviet Union led to the destruction of 80% of the nuclear arsenal on the planet. Scientists and intellectuals on both sides played a recognized role in pushing politicians towards a rational de-escalation. In 1955, one of the most prominent philosophers of the 20th century, mathematician and Nobel Prize winner for literature, Bertrand Russell and Nobel laureate for physics Albert Einstein signed an influential manifesto, and the Pugwash Conference, inspired by it, brough together scientists of both sides, lobbying for de-escalation. When Russell, in 1959, was asked to leave a message for posterity, he replied:

“In this world, which is getting more and more closely interconnected, we have to learn to tolerate each other, we have to learn to put up with the fact that some people say things that we don’t like. We can only live together in that way. But if we are to live together, and not die together, we must learn a kind of charity and a kind of tolerance, which is absolutely vital to the continuation of human life on this planet.”

We should hold on to this wise intellectual heritage.

Major conflicts have always been preceded by massive military investments. Since 2009, global military spending has reached unprecedented record levels each year, with 2024 expenditure hitting an all-time high of 2443 billion dollars. The “ReArm Europe Plan” commits Europe to invest 800 billion euros in military expenses. Both the current President of the USA and the current President of Russia have recently stated they are ready to start talks for normalization of the relations and for balanced military reduction. The President of China is repeatedly calling for de-escalation and moving from a confrontational mentality towards a collaborative ‘win-win’ mentality. This is the direction to go. And now Europe prepares for war, with new planned military expenditures unseen since World War II. Is Europe now willing to rattle swords because it feels left out?

Humankind faces tremendous global challenges: climate change, famine in the global South, largest-ever economic inequality, increasing risks of pandemics, nuclear war. The last thing we need today is the Old Continent to move from a beacon of stability and peace to becoming a new warlord.

Si vis pacem para pacem—if you want peace, construct peace, not war.

Endorsed by Science4peace
Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation
World beyond War
Pressenza
Fronte del Dissenso (STOPWW3 INITIATIVE FOR PEACE)
Philosophy for Future
International Society of Doctors for Environment
Disarmisti Esigenti
Movimento Europeo
Science for the People – Italy

Signatories

The full list of signatories can be found here


IUS Editors

The International Union of Scientists (IUS), Scientists Against Militarism and the Destructive Use of Science and Technology. IUS brings together scientists from around the world who refuse to stay silent in the face of atrocities like the genocide in Palestine. We stand united against the weaponization of science and technology for war, authoritarianism, and the dehumanization of life. As scientists, we recognize that our scientific and technological research holds power and influence. We believe science is not morally neutral. It is inseparable from the social and political contexts in which it operates. Our work can either serve humanity or contribute to its downfall—and we choose to stand for humanity.
Unthinking, Apathy, and Genocide

By David Swanson
April 17, 2025
Source: David Swanson





Late last century I figured out that I needed to work on a job dedicated to making the world a better place. I know not everyone can find such a job if they try. I appreciate all the other useful jobs that millions of people do — if not the useless and destructive ones that millions of other people do. But I do want people to use some of their spare time to help out with the cratering world. In every moment of the past quarter century there have been people diligently creating catastrophes — wars, ecosystemic destruction, mass incarceration, poverty, etc. — and yet there have been moments in which people in my corner of the world have increasingly said things to me along the lines of “Wow it seems like maybe soon I’ll need to ask you about that activism stuff.”

A newly expanded book called The Evil of Banality by Elizabeth Minnich looks at how people come to do horrific things like genocides, but also how they allow horrible things to gradually develop. I’m thinking of the centuries-long but ever accelerating shifting of U.S. governmental power to Congress’s executive, or the growth of the military industrial complex, or the normalization of animosity toward immigrants. Minnich’s analysis is complex, but puts a lot of weight on the failure to think. Mass murder may often require a failure to think about the lives of the victims. Members of militaries are conditioned to kill without thinking, and often think about it with great suffering only afterwards. Sitting back and allowing a president to claim the power to imprison anyone may similarly require a failure to think about the lives of the first victims of that policy, as well as a failure to realize that one of the future lives may be your own — as well as a failure to know one’s potential and strategy for changing things. Supporting a genocide in Gaza with the argument that you are somehow thereby precisely opposing a genocide 80 years earlier in Europe may require a failure to think seriously about either genocide, or at least one of them.

Minnich looks into all variety of propaganda techniques, distractions, base motivations, careerism, obedience as a form of avoiding responsibility, obsession with a goal, etc., but puts a focus on denial, on refusal or failure to focus the mind. I think of Trump and gang speaking about the suffering of war victims in Ukraine while speaking and acting as if Palestinians were more a disease than a population. I think of authors cited in Minnich’s book, like Samantha Power, pontificating about past genocides, while dutifully working for a government actively arming and supporting one. I think of all the editors and producers in U.S. media who 10 or 20 years ago scorned and mocked warnings of creeping fascism. I think of global broiling deniers. Minnich points to the strategy employed by Gandhi of nonviolently suffering abuse until those committing it were forced to think about it.

To the extent that this notion of failure to think seems helpful — and I believe it is a great extent — I would suggest two categories of it. The first is the one Minnich examines. She describes a prison guard who has abused prisoners who later regrets or objects to such abuse as “having returned to reflective thought.” But said guard has returned to reflective thought within a culture that contains widespread understanding that what he has done is awful, understanding of which said guard had been aware all the time but had chosen to avoid or overrule. If, on the other hand, the same prison guard were to begin working for the abolition of incarceration entirely, or an organized popular refusal to consume fossil fuels, or the elimination of the livestock industry, or the dismantling of all nuclear weapons, he would probably be described more as engaging in creative thought than returning to reflective thought. If he were to propose the restoration of plantation slavery or theocracy, he would probably not be described only as failing to think about the suffering that would be created but also as proposing something so old that it’s new. If — to find a middle-ground that blurs the distinction I have in mind — he were to suggest that his state in the United States at long last eliminate the 13th Amendment-like exception for slavery as criminal punishment that his state’s constitution establishes or fails to ban, he would be either traveling to or returning to an idea that some are aware of and others not.

I’d like to live in a world in which someone might be said to have returned to reflective thinking when he or she ceased harming non-human creatures as well as human ones. Most of us don’t live in that world right now. And yet it still requires a certain failure to think if you are to fail to work for the creation of that world. If engaging in slavery like others around you centuries ago was a failure to think, then phoning the cops today on someone suspiciously holding a peace sign whom you’ve just passed in your gas-guzzling SUV, cranking up the AC, and stuffing a hamburger in your mouth may also involve a failure to think.

Minnich writes about the attentistes in France under Nazi occupation, the people who wanted to wait and see what the Nazis might do before organizing any resistance to it. I imagine Senator Chuck Schumer dreaming of a team’s captain jersey for the Attentistes, the new mascot for Columbia University. But those waiting and seeing whether we can survive nuclear weapons a bit longer or whether the collapsing environment collapses to a point of uninhabitability or whether shifting ever more government spending to war creates wars we don’t survive — all of these are also attentistes.

Minnich counsels pre-developing a culture of independence and resistance, conditioning oneself with good habits, but being prepared to think clearly in times of crisis. Whether we call them attentistes or unthinkers or the apathetic, the vast majority of people who do nothing in the way of civic participation beyond voting — the people who say they are “not political” or “not an activist” — always have the chance to get involved, by small or large steps. There is a first day for everything. And for anyone thinking, there is no time of non-crisis.

To people considering whether the moment has finally come to do something, I recommend a new book by Ralph Nader called Civic Self-Respect. Nader is in agreement with Minnich that how we behave — as individuals and as organizations — leading up to a crisis impacts how we behave in that crisis. Nader throws another term into the mix: idiots:

“Historians say 495 to 529 BCE, the time of the statesman Pericles, was the golden age of ancient Athenian democracy. The men (women were not allowed to vote, though they found ways to be influential) made an important distinction between Athenians who behaved as ‘public citizens,’ caring for and engaging in the city-state of some forty-five thousand voters, and those who cared only for themselves. The latter were called ‘idiots,’ or ignorant people, because they didn’t improve society. Today, the word ‘idiot’ has taken on a different meaning, so we do not have a popular contemporary noun to describe the great majority of Americans who stay within their private lives and barely venture into the civic square except maybe to cast a vote.”

Apart from one chapter on where rich people should put their money, this is not a book about what elites should do, but about what everyone should do. Nader provides numerous stellar examples of people who have become active in various areas, including the fields of working, shopping, tax paying, voting, parenting, and donating. He examines an array of barriers that overlap with Minnich’s, including distraction, but also including learned helplessness. People don’t just fail to try to change things because it hasn’t occurred to them, but also because they’ve been taught that they are powerless, that things cannot be changed. So, they have to learn not only to care but also to be aware of what is possible and how to increase its likelihood.

We need education and organizing. We need radical vision and gentle nudging. We need to both support and challenge an opposition to a fascistic government that supports both human needs and endless war, that challenges elected officials but only if they are of a particular political party. All of this requires bravery and caring and thinking.


ZNetwork is funded solely through the generosity of its readers.Donate

Related PostsDefending Society Against MAGA Tyranny: A Prospectus for Action
Jeremy Brecher -- January 01, 2025
Grief, Mourning, and Solidarity
Sarah Jaffe -- January 02, 2025
An Oral History of The Next American Revolution #2: First Breaths
Michael Albert -- May 27, 2024
The BBC’s Civil War Over Gaza
Owen Jones -- December 20, 2024
Answering The Call To Fight Injustice
Barbara Smith -- June 12, 2024
DonateFacebookTwitterRedditEmail

David Swanson

David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is executive director of World BEYOND War and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson’s books include War Is A Lie and When the World Outlawed War. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org and WarIsACrime.org. He hosts Talk World Radio. He is a Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.

Libraries are Priceless and They Need Our Support



 April 15, 2025
\Facebook\TwitterReddit

Growing up as an avid reader, I loved trips with my mom to our local library. It also served as a community space where I attended many birthday parties and baby showers to celebrate our neighbors.

If you love your local library too, you’ll want to listen up.

A few weeks ago, President Trump issued an executive order calling for the elimination of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), adding to a growing list of illegal efforts to bypass Congress and abolish entire government agencies. All staff at the agency were placed on administrative leave on March 31.

IMLS is an independent federal agency that provides crucial financial support to America’s 125,000 public, school, academic, and special libraries and museums nationwide.

In fiscal year 2024, Congress set aside $266.7 million for IMLS. It may sound like a big number, but that’s just 0.003 percent of the federal budget. It amounts to only about 75 cents per person. The savings will be minimal, but the costs will be huge.

Completely dissolving the agency would cancel important grants that help states support and expand library programming and services. They’d effectively disappear, creating immense financial insecurity for libraries across the country and hurting their ability to serve their communities.

Beyond carrying books and DVDs, libraries provide essential programs and resources to the people they serve. While every library is unique, offerings include: helping students with homework or research, reading and literacy programming for children of all ages, as well as English language, GED, and citizenship classes.

Many libraries also offer employment assistance for job seekers, braille or audio books for individuals with visual impairments, and bookmobile services for those who can’t get to their library. And this list is surely incomplete.

Slashing federal library funding will have devastating repercussions for libraries everywhere, with rural communities and small towns experiencing the brunt of the impact. Over 30 million Americans are served by rural library systems — and over three-fourths of public libraries serve areas with fewer than 25,000 people.

My home state of New Mexico is largely rural, with 127 public and tribal libraries. In remote and unincorporated places, libraries even offer telephone service and drinking water for residents who don’t have access to it.

Computers and high-speed internet are another library service that over 77 million Americans depend on every year. Many libraries also distribute non-partisan voter information and serve as polling stations during elections.

In recent years, libraries in the United States have come under a “culture war” assault as certain politicians and extremists try to censor books about race/ethnicity, gender, and sexuality in their catalogs. The administration’s targeting of IMLS builds on this onslaught, seeking to further undermine truth and dismantle libraries as pillars of equitable access to information and opportunity.

The return on the small investments taxpayers make in libraries is enormous, including increased literacy and economic opportunities. What’s more, libraries are one of the only accessible and free gathering spaces in many communities. Two-thirds of Americans think that closing their local public libraries would hurt their communities, Pew Research found.

Our libraries deserve more support, not less. So what can you do?

Contact your legislators directly: Tell Congress to hold the line against the Trump administration and DOGE and protect this vital funding and agency.

Show up: Attend community meetings to advocate for continued funding and emphasize why libraries matter. Visit your local library — and get a card if you don’t have one already!

Speak out: Share your support online and tell your own library stories. Use hashtags like #FundLibraries or #ShowUpForLibraries and check out the American Library Association’s social media toolkit at ala.org/advocacy.

Aspen Coriz-Romero is the New Mexico Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.