Tuesday, June 24, 2025

UK

Yvette Cooper vows to ban Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws

“Remember when they called Nelson Mandela a terrorist.”


Haroon Siddique and Geneva Abdul
Mon, June 23, 2025
  THE GUARDIAN


A protester holds up a placard during a demonstration in support of Palestine Action in Trafalgar Square, London, on Monday.
Photograph: Sean Smith/The Guardian

The home secretary has said she will ban Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws, ignoring a warning from the group’s solicitors that the proposal was “unlawful, dangerous and ill thought out”.

In a statement to parliament on Monday, three days after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton, Yvette Cooper said a draft proscription order would be laid in parliament on 30 June. If passed, it would make it illegal to be a member of, or invite support for, Palestine Action.

The group, founded in 2020, says it aims to prevent the commission of genocide and war crimes in Palestine and to expose and target property and premises connected to such crimes against humanity.

Many of its activists have been acquitted by juries in the past and a letter from Kellys Solicitors, which represents several Palestine Action activists, sent to Cooper on Monday said the group “has gathered a significant level of public support”.

But in her statement, the home secretary said: “The disgraceful attack on Brize Norton in the early hours of the morning on Friday 20 June is the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action. The UK’s defence enterprise is vital to the nation’s national security and this government will not tolerate those that put that security at risk.”

Palestine Action called the proposed ban “unhinged” and accused Keir Starmer of “rank hypocrisy”, given that he defended protesters who broke into RAF Fairford in 2003 to stop US bombers heading to Iraq.

Describing its members as “teachers, nurses, students and parents”, it said: “This is an unhinged reaction to an action spraying paint in protest [at] the UK government arming Israel’s slaughter of the Palestinian people.

“The real crime here is not red paint being sprayed on these warplanes, but the war crimes that have been enabled with those planes because of the UK government’s complicity in Israel’s genocide.”

It said Cooper’s statement repeated a series of categorically false claims made by pro-Israel groups and that its lawyers were pursuing all avenues for legal challenge.

The letter to Cooper from Kellys, shared exclusively with the Guardian, said there were no previous instances of direct action protest organisations being proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000, despite several others having used comparable methods to Palestine Action, and that it was a “terrifying precedent” to place it alongside groups such as Islamic State, al-Qaida or National Action.

It said: “Whilst some actions of those associated with Palestine Action have involved damage to property, activists do not advocate or intend unlawful violence against the person. A significant number of actions associated with Palestine Action have used entirely conventional campaigning methods such as marches, rallies and demos. It is an authoritarian turn and an abuse of language to label them as a ‘terrorist’ organisation.

“The proposal to proscribe Palestine Action is wholly unprecedented and constitutes an unlawful, dangerous and ill thought out attack on freedom of expression and assembly.”



Amnesty International and Liberty also wrote a joint letter to Cooper before the announcement to express their concerns.

The former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn called the government’s decision “as absurd as it is authoritarian”, adding: “It represents a draconian assault on democratic right to protest and is a disgraceful attempt to hide the real meaning of violence: the mass murder of Palestinians.”

The Labour peer and barrister John Hendy KC said: “This is an abuse of anti-terrorist legislation which was passed to apply to terrorist activities, not non-violent protest. There is a full armoury of criminal laws to deal with unlawful non-violent protest, as the PM knows better than most.”

The former justice secretary Charlie Falconer said on Sunday that the “sort of demonstration” at Brize Norton would not justify proscription, “so there must be something else that I don’t know about”.

The home secretary’s statement appeared to offer no new information about the group. Cooper said it had been deemed to meet the threshold for proscription “through a robust evidence-based process, by a wide range of experts from across government, the police and the security services”.

On Sunday night, the Metropolitan police placed public order restrictions on a planned solidarity demonstration for Palestine Action, so hundreds of supporters instead took to the streets surrounding Trafalgar Square in London on Monday afternoon.

A Met spokesperson said 13 people had been arrested, including six people for assaulting an emergency worker. “While the protest initially began in a peaceful manner, officers faced violence when they went into the crowd to speak to three individuals whose behaviour was arousing suspicion,” they said.

“This sequence of events repeated itself on multiple occasions, with officers being surrounded on each occasion they tried to deal with an incident.”

As arrests were made, protesters chanted “Let them go” at lines of police. Those in attendance called the government decision “anti-democratic” and a shocking overreach.

Among those concerned was Nasiya, who has lived in London for 20 years. Born and raised in South Africa, she knew what apartheid looked like first-hand, she said, as she held a placard that said: “Remember when they called Nelson Mandela a terrorist.”


MPs raise concerns about Labour’s plan to proscribe Palestine Action as terror group



Yesterday
Left Foot Forward


‘Such a move would be completely non-proportional and a hugely worrying restriction on the right to peaceful protest’



MPs have voiced concern as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said the government plans to proscribe Palestine Action under terrorism laws after they targeted an RAF base last week.

A draft proscription order will be presented to Parliament next Monday, and if passed, will make it illegal to be part of or “invite support for” the pro-Palestinian protest network under Section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

In a written statement to Parliament today, Cooper said that since it was formed in 2020, “Palestine Action has orchestrated a nationwide campaign of direct criminal action against businesses and institutions”.

On Friday morning, activists from Palestine Action, which uses direct action tactics to disrupt the UK arms industry, broke into RAF Brize Norton base in Oxfordshire and spray painted two military planes.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the actions, calling them “disgraceful” and “an act of vandalism”.

Today, Palestine Action are protesting outside Parliament about the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Left MPs have warned that proscribing the group represents a misuse of anti-terrorism powers, and threatens the right to peaceful protest.

Labour MP Nadia Whittome said in a post on X: “Targeting non-violent protesters in this way is a misuse of terrorism-related powers.

“It sets a dangerous precedent, which governments in future could further use against their critics,” adding that “we should all be concerned” about the Home Secretary’s plan.

Ellie Chowns, a Green MP, wrote on X that she was “deeply concerned” about the announcement. She said: “This is a shocking overreaction to a couple of protestors using paint.

“Such a move would be completely non-proportional and a hugely worrying restriction on the right to peaceful protest which is a cornerstone of democracy.”

Irish novelist Sally Rooney has written about the government’s plan to proscribe Palestine Action in the Guardian today.

While the Home Secretary has broad powers to proscribe any organisation “concerned in terrorism”, Rooney points out that this process has previously only been used against militant groups involved in or advocating for violent armed struggle.

Rooney warned: “If the government proceeds down this path, any ordinary person in the UK could in theory be sent to prison simply for expressing verbal support for non-violent activism.”

She added that: “Palestine Action is not an armed group. It has never been responsible for any fatalities and does not pose any risk to the public.”

The bestselling author said she supports Palestine Action wholeheartedly and added that she “will continue to, whether that becomes a terrorist offence or not”.

Olivia Barber is a reporter at Left Foot Forward

Who are Palestine Action and why is the UK government banning them?

Albert Toth
Mon, June 23, 2025
THE INDEPENDENT

The pro-Palestine activist group that broke into an Oxfordshire RAF base to spray-paint military planes has been banned by the Home Office .

Formed in 2020, Palestine Action has conducted a series of direct action protests over the past five years, largely against arms manufacturers operating in the UK and selling weapons to Israel.

Home secretary Yvette Cooper has now confirmed her decision to proscribe the group following its latest action, effectively branding it a terrorist organisation. This would make it illegal to become a member of Palestine Action or solicit support for it.

A spokesperson for Palestine Action said: "When our government fails to uphold their moral and legal obligations, it is the responsibility of ordinary citizens to take direct action."


Pro-Palestinian activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire (Palestine Action/PA) (Palestine Action)

A protest in central London on Monday in response to the fallout, has seen police clash with demonstrators. Met Police chief Mark Rowley said before the event he was “shocked and frustrated” by the plans, adding that he believed the action goes “beyond what most would see as legitimate protest."
What else has Palestine Action done in the past?

Palestine Action was established on 30 July 2020 after a group of activists broke into and spray-painted the interior of Elbit Systems’ UK headquarters in London.

The defence contractor has continued to be the main target of Palestine Action’s protests since its formation. Based in Israel Elbit Systems is the country’s largest weapons manufacturer. It supplies the majority of the drones and land-based equipment used by the Israeli military.

In the UK, Elbit has multiple UK subsidiaries which operate across 16 sites across the country, with 680 employees. Its latest new site is a manufacturing and development facility in Bristol, opened in 2023.

On 19 May 2021 four members of Palestine Action dressed in boilers suits climbed onto the roof of an Elbit-owned drone factory in Leicester. The action was taken in response to a period of unrest in May of that year, in which 256 Palestinians and 17 Israelis were killed.


Home secretary Yvette Cooper is understood to have decided to proscribe Palestine Action (House of Commons)

Similar occupations have been carried out at Elbit-owned sites in Bristol, Oldham and Tamworth.

In April 2024, the group targeted Somerset County Hall, a Grade II-listed building owned by Somerset council, by splashing it with red paint. This was in response to the local authority leasing a building to Elbit near Bristol

This site was targeted by Palestine Action for the 17th time in March 2025, with four of the groups members using a cherry picker to damage the building. One used a sledgehammer on a rope to smash windows while others spray painted the building.

In June 2025, activists from the group damaged two planes at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire by using repurposed fire extinguishers to spray red paint into their turbine engines and cause further damage with crowbars.

Palestine Action say its members did this due to flights that leave the site daily for Akrotiri in Cyprus, the site of a base used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East.

A spokesperson for the group said: “By putting the planes out of service, activists have interrupted Britain’s direct participation in the commission of genocide and war crimes across the Middle East.”

Ban on Palestine Action would have ‘chilling effect’ on other protest groups

Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent
THE GUARDIAN
Mon, June 23, 2025 


Pro-Palestine protesters protest in Trafalgar Square, including supporters of Palestine Action.Photograph: Sean Smith/The Guardian

The crackdown on protest in England and Wales has been ringing alarm bells for years, but the decision to ban Palestine Action under anti-terrorism laws raises the stakes dramatically.

As the group itself has said, it is the first time the government has attempted to proscribe a direct action protest organisation under the Terrorism Act, placing it alongside the likes of Islamic State, al-Qaida and National Action.

The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said the proposed ban was evidence-based and had been assessed by a wide range of experts.


In several attacks, Palestine Action has committed acts of serious damage to property with the aim of progressing its political cause and influencing the government,” she said.

Proscribing the group, which uses direct action mainly to target Israeli weapons factories in the UK, would make it illegal not only to be a member of Palestine Action but to show support for it.

Given that neither its methods nor its targets are unprecedented, a ban is likely to make every group which has an aim of “progressing its political cause and influencing the government” through protest think twice.

Greenpeace UK’s co-executive director, Areeba Hamid, said a ban would “mark a dark turn for our democracy and a new low for a government already intent on stamping out the right to protest. The police already have laws to prosecute any individuals found guilty of a crime.”

Laws passed in recent years have already increased police powers to restrict and shut down protests. At the same time, protesters have often been gagged from telling juries what motivated their actions and have received record prison sentences.

The final straw for ministers appears to have been the embarrassing security breach at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on Friday, in which two Palestine Action activists broke in and sprayed two military planes with red paint.

But protesters have caused criminal damage to military facilities in the past and even been acquitted for it, while Cooper herself admitted it might not amount to terrorism.

Before becoming prime minister, Keir Starmer successfully defended protesters who broke into an RAF base in 2003 to stop US bombers heading to Iraq. He argued that it was lawful because their intention was to prevent war crimes.

Palestine Action said that pro-Israel groups had lobbied for the ban and there is evidence to support that contention.

Internal government documents released under freedom of information laws have revealed meetings, apparently to discuss Palestine Action, between the government and Israeli embassy officials, although they were heavily redacted. Ministers have also met representatives from the Israeli arms firm Elbit Systems.

The organisation We Believe in Israel, which Labour MP Luke Akehurst used to be director of, began a campaign this month to ban Palestine Action.

In an accompanying report, it stated: “In July 2022, the group was investigated under counter-terrorism protocols following intelligence suggesting contact between some of its members and individuals linked to Hamas-aligned networks abroad (see: Metropolitan Police briefing, classified).

“While the investigation yielded no direct terror charges, it underscored the degree of concern shared by law enforcement agencies over Palestine Action’s increasingly radicalised behaviour.”

It is not clear how or why We Believe in Israel was granted access to classified documents.

There was no reference to links to Hamas in Cooper’s statement but she did refer to Palestine Action as threatening infrastructure which supports Ukraine and Nato, echoing language in We Believe in Israel’s report.

With the government already unpopular among many over its stance on Gaza, the planned ban risks looking like it is based on Palestine Action’s cause rather than its methods.

Akiko Hart, Liberty director, said: “Proscribing a direct-action protest group in this way potentially sets a new precedent for what we do and do not treat as terrorism.

“We’re worried about the chilling effect this would have on the thousands of people who campaign for Palestine, and their ability to express themselves and take part in protests.

“Proscribing Palestine Action would mean that showing support for them in any way – for example, sharing a post on social media or wearing a logo – could carry a prison sentence.”


UK moves to ban protest group Palestine Action


Peter HUTCHISON and Clara CANDILLIER
Mon, June 23, 2025 


Supporters of Palestine Action protest at Trafalgar Square in London as Britain moves to ban the group (HENRY NICHOLLS)HENRY NICHOLLS/AFP/AFP

The UK government announced Monday it would ban campaign group Palestine Action under anti-terror laws following a "disgraceful attack" on Britain's largest air force base last week.

The group denounced the proposed ban, announced by interior minister Yvette Cooper, as an "unhinged reaction" and its supporters scuffled with police in central London as they protested the move.

On Friday, Palestine Action activists broke into the RAF Brize Norton base in southern England, raising questions about security at the site and embarrassing Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government.

A video posted by the group showed two activists spraying a plane with red paint while roaming the base on scooters. Counter-terror police are investigating the incident.

Cooper said the vandalism at the base was "the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage" committed by the group since it formed in 2020.

"In several attacks, Palestine Action has committed acts of serious damage to property with the aim of progressing its political cause and influencing the government," Cooper said in a statement.

She announced she would lay a draft order before parliament next Monday that would ban the group under Britain's Terrorism Act of 2000.

Labour holds a massive majority in parliament, meaning the proposal should pass easily.

Palestine Action condemned the proposed ban as an attack on free speech.

"The real crime here is not red paint being sprayed on these war planes, but the war crimes that have been enabled with those planes because of the UK Government's complicity in Israel's genocide," it said in a statement.

Cooper listed other attacks by Palestine Action at Thales defence factory in Glasgow in 2022, and two last year against Instro Precision in Kent, southeast England, and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol, in the country's southwest.

"Such incidents do not represent legitimate or peaceful protest," Cooper said.

"The UK's defence enterprise is vital to the nation's national security and this government will not tolerate those that put that security at risk," she added.

The ban will make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

Cooper stressed that her decision "is specific to Palestine Action and does not affect lawful protest groups and other organisations campaigning on issues around Palestine or the Middle East".

- 'Too far' -

But Labour's former spokesperson on legal matters Shami Chakrabarti, speaking ahead of the government's announcement, said she shared concerns that a ban could be going "too far".

"From what I can tell, this is a militant protest group that engages in direct action and that includes criminality, no question, but to elevate that to terrorism... is a serious escalation I think," she told BBC radio.

Palestine Action says it uses "disruption tactics" to target "corporate enablers" and seeks to "make it impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians".

In recent months, it has sprayed the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalised US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland.

Last month, Palestine Action claimed responsibility for vandalising a US military aircraft in Ireland.

In London Monday, protesters surged towards police when officers tried to detain someone, while onlookers chanted "let them go".

"It's an attack on civil rights," 45-year-old demonstrator Joe Dawson, who works in advertising, said of the proposed ban.

"At most it's criminal damage, not terrorism," he told AFP.

Starmer's Labour government suspended around 30 out of 350 arms export licenses to Israel last September, citing a "risk" they could be used in violations of international law.

But the UK continues to supply components for F-35 fighter jets to a global pool that Israel is able to access.

Israel has repeatedly denied allegations it is committing genocide in Gaza during its 20-month-long military campaign following Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023.

Some 80 organisations are banned under the UK's Terrorism Act, including al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Russia's Wagner paramilitary group.

pdh-str/jwp/yad



Met Chief ‘shocked and frustrated’ at planned Palestine Action protest

Charles Hymas
Sun, June 22, 2025 
TELEGRAPH


Home Secretary expected to confirm plans on Monday to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation

Sir Mark Rowley has said he is “shocked and frustrated” that Palestine Action is mounting a protest outside Parliament just three days after damaging planes at Brize Norton RAF base.

The Metropolitan Police Commissioner said he did not have the power to ban the protest because Palestine Action, which he branded an “extremist criminal group”, has not yet been proscribed.

Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is expected to announce plans on Monday to proscribe the group, putting it on a par with Hamas, al-Qaeda and Islamic State.

“If that happens we will be determined to target those who continue to act in its name and those who show support for it,” Sir Mark vowed.

He revealed that the Met had laid out to the Government the “operational basis” on which it could consider proscribing the group following its attack on Brize Norton, in which activists breached security and sprayed paint into the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft.

His comments came after Lord Walney, the former Government adviser on political violence, told The Telegraph that MPs’ and peers’ security was at risk from Monday’s protest.

He said there was growing concern following a previous pro-Palestine demonstration outside Parliament two weeks ago, which saw peers “harassed, intimidated and obstructed”

Sir Mark said: “I’m sure many people will be as shocked and frustrated as I am to see a protest taking place tomorrow in support of Palestine Action.

“We do have the power to impose conditions on it to prevent disorder, damage, and serious disruption to the community, including to Parliament, to elected representatives moving around Westminster and to ordinary Londoners.”


Sir Mark Rowley says the Met is concerned about the Palestine Action protest outside Parliament - Getty Images/Leon Neal

He said members of Palestine Action were alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage and assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer even before last week’s attack on Brize Norton. He noted multiple members of the group were awaiting trial accused of serious offences.

“The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest,” he said.

“Thousands of people attend protests of a different character every week without clashing with the law or with the police. The criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, in contrast, represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public rejects.”


Palestine Action has also targetted Trump Turnberry, a golf club own by Donald Trump - Milo Chandler/PA Wire

Palestine Action has posted on social media a call to supporters to join an “emergency mobilisation” on Monday at 12pm at the Houses of Parliament, with the headline “We are all Palestine Action”.

Some 60 peers have written to Lord McFall, the Lord Speaker, calling for a review of current security arrangements around Parliament with Scotland Yard and parliamentary officials.

Lord Walney said: “MPs and peers look like they have to run the gauntlet just to get into Parliament to exercise their democratic duty on behalf of the nation. This is putting their security at risk and clearly undermining democracy where parliamentarians feel they are afraid to go to work.

“The Met have frankly let people down recently in the way they have allowed crowds to physically intimidate people trying to get access to Parliament. There is a real responsibility for them to change their approach for this protest.

“This is an organisation set to be banned as a terrorist organisation which is connected to a number of trials going through the system involving serious violence against individuals.”

Jonathan Hall KC, the Government’s independent adviser on terrorism legislation, said that proscription of Palestine Action was “within the bounds of acceptability” even though it was on the basis of the scale of damage to significant infrastructure including military equipment rather than against individuals.

“All other terrorist organisations are banned or proscribed because they are using or threatening violence to people. This is an unusual one in this respect,” he said.

However, he suggested that Palestine Action had tipped over into “blackmail” rather than purely protest. “It’s gone to a point where they’ve started to say, we will carry on causing hundreds of millions of pounds worth of damage unless you stop,” said Mr Hall.

“And I think the way the law approaches that, there’s a difference between protest and effectively, blackmail.”


Palestine Action’s latest protest saw it spray-paint the engines of two Airbus Voyager aircraft a Brize Norton RAF base

However, Lord Falconer, the former Labour lord chancellor, said vandalising aircraft at the RAF Brize Norton would not solely provide legal justification for proscribing Palestine Action.

Asked whether the group’s actions were “commensurate with the need to proscribe an organisation”, Lord Falconer told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: “I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton, they may have done other things I didn’t know.

“I think the question will probably not be what we know about them publicly, but there would need to be something that was known by those who look at these sorts of things that we don’t know about, because I mean, they got into the air base which might suggest they’ve got some degree of ability to make them dangerous, I don’t know.

“But generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn’t justify proscription so there must be something else that I don’t know about.”


Met Police head ‘shocked’ at planned protest in support of Palestine Action

Sam Hall
Mon, June 23, 2025
THE INDEPENDENT

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has voiced his "shock and frustration" over a planned protest in Westminster supporting Palestine Action.

He branded the organisation, which the Government is moving to ban, as an “organised extremist criminal group”.

Sir Mark lamented the current legal limitations, stating that until Palestine Action is officially proscribed, the force has “no power in law” to prevent the demonstration from taking place.

He did, however, issue a clear warning that any breaches of the law during the protest would be “dealt with robustly”.

The Home Secretary is scheduled to update Parliament on Monday regarding the government's intention to ban Palestine Action, a decision spurred by the group's recent vandalism of two planes at an RAF base.

Yvette Cooper will provide MPs with more details on the move to proscribe the group, making it a criminal offence to belong to or support it, in a written ministerial statement.

The decision comes after the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire.


The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine.

The incident is being investigated by counter-terror police.

In a statement on Sunday, Sir Mark said: “I’m sure many people will be as shocked and frustrated as I am to see a protest taking place tomorrow in support of Palestine Action.

“This is an organised extremist criminal group, whose proscription as terrorists is being actively considered.

“Members are alleged to have caused millions of pounds of criminal damage, assaulted a police officer with a sledgehammer and last week claimed responsibility for breaking into an airbase and damaging aircraft. Multiple members of the group are awaiting trial accused of serious offences.

“The right to protest is essential and we will always defend it, but actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest.

“Thousands of people attend protests of a different character every week without clashing with the law or with the police. The criminal charges faced by Palestine Action members, in contrast, represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public rejects.

“We have laid out to Government the operational basis on which to consider proscribing this group. If that happens we will be determined to target those who continue to act in its name and those who show support for it.

“Until then we have no power in law to prevent tomorrow’s protest taking place. We do, however, have the power to impose conditions on it to prevent disorder, damage, and serious disruption to the community, including to Parliament, to elected representatives moving around Westminster and to ordinary Londoners.

“Breaches of the law will be dealt with robustly.”



Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley (PA Archive)

A spokesperson for Palestine Action previously accused the UK of failing to meet its obligation to prevent or punish genocide.

The spokesperson said: “When our Government fails to uphold their moral and legal obligations, it is the responsibility of ordinary citizens to take direct action. The terrorists are the ones committing a genocide, not those who break the tools used to commit it.”

Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds said he could not rule out the possibility of a foreign power being behind Palestine Action.

The Business and Trade Secretary told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: “It is extremely concerning they gained access to that base and the Defence Secretary is doing an immediate review of how that happened.


“The actions that they undertook at Brize Norton were also completely unacceptable and it’s not the first. It’s the fourth attack by that group on a key piece of UK defence infrastructure.”

The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is “concerned in terrorism”.


Proscription will require Ms Cooper to lay an order in Parliament, which must then be debated and approved by both MPs and peers.

Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group.

Former justice secretary Lord Charlie Falconer said vandalising aircraft at RAF Brize Norton would not solely provide legal justification for proscribing the group.

Asked whether the group’s actions were commensurate with proscription, Lord Falconer told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: “I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton, they may have done other things I didn’t know.

“But generally, that sort of demonstration wouldn’t justify proscription so there must be something else that I don’t know about.”

Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf said the Government was “abusing” anti-terror laws against pro-Palestine activists, as tens of thousands of protesters marched in London on Saturday.

Belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation, along with a number of other actions, are criminal offences carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.


The Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) welcomed the news that Ms Cooper intended to proscribe Palestine Action, saying: “Nobody should be surprised that those who vandalised Jewish premises with impunity have now been emboldened to sabotage RAF jets.”

Former home secretary Suella Braverman also said it was “absolutely the correct decision”.

A pro-Palestine protester at Saturday’s march in central London said it was “absolutely horrendous” that the Government was preparing to ban Palestine Action.

Artist Hannah Woodhouse, 61, told the PA news agency: “Counter-terrorism measures, it seems, are being used against non-violent peace protesters.

“The peace activists are trying to do the Government’s job, which is to disarm Israel.”

Palestine Action has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf course .



Monday, June 23, 2025


Sun’s fury may change the weather on distant worlds — and maybe even ours





The Hebrew University of Jerusalem





Jerusalem, Israel — A new study led by scientists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, NASA, the Florida Institute of Technology, the Barcelona Supercomputing Center, and the University of Oxford has uncovered a connection between solar flares — sudden outbursts of radiation from stars — and short-term weather patterns on distant Earth-like planets.

Published in The Astronomical Journal, the study offers the clearest evidence yet that space weather — particularly flares from a planet’s host star — can cause measurable changes in a planet’s climate within just days of an event. These findings provide important clues about the habitability of exoplanets and may even help refine how we understand short-term atmospheric shifts on Earth.

“This study highlights an underexplored but important solar-climate link,” said Dr. Assaf Hochman, from the Institute of Earth Sciences at Hebrew University. “While anthropogenic greenhouse gases primarily drive long-term climate change, we now see that short-term solar variability can also play a role in modulating regional climate behavior.”

The international team — including Dr. Assaf Hochman, Dr. Howard Chen, Dr. Paolo De Luca, and Dr. Thaddeus D. Komacek — used advanced 3D General Circulation Models to simulate how sudden flares from host stars affect the climate on tidally-locked exo-Earths such as TRAPPIST-1e, a planet that always shows the same face to its sun.

Their results reveal a chain reaction:

  • Upper atmospheric cooling occurs quickly after a flare, driven by radiative emissions from molecules like NO and CO₂.
  • Simultaneously, lower atmospheric warming happens due to increases in greenhouse-like gases such as H₂O and N₂O.
  • Wind speeds in the middle atmosphere can intensify dramatically — surging to over 140 km/h on the dark, night side of the planet.

What It Means for Earth — and Beyond

While the main focus was on distant worlds, the study opens up provocative possibilities for Earth’s climate systems too.

The patterns observed suggest that solar activity may temporarily alter a planet’s general atmospheric circulation. This isn’t about long-term climate shifts, but rather short-lived regional anomalies — the kind that could be especially noticeable in already volatile weather zones.

The research emphasizes that while solar flares aren’t a major driver of Earth’s long-term climate compared to human activity, their effects are real, detectable, and worth factoring into future atmospheric models. This is particularly true when considering regions sensitive to abrupt changes in temperature and wind.

The study also underscores that stars don’t just warm their planets — they can stir up the weather too. Understanding these interactions is crucial to assessing which exoplanets might truly be capable of supporting life.

This interdisciplinary effort brought together experts in astroclimate modeling, atmospheric chemistry, and planetary science, with support from institutions across four countries and multiple NASA research centers. Their findings not only enhance our understanding of distant exoplanets but could also help us refine how we predict and prepare for solar influences here on Earth.

 

Australian native bee honey shows medical potential in the fight against antibiotic resistance




‘Sugarbag’ honey, historically used by First Nations, could scale commercially



University of Sydney

Dr Kenya Fernandes 

image: 

Lead author Dr Kenya Fernandes in the field.

view more 

Credit: The University of Sydney





Resistance to synthetic antibiotics poses a critical global health challenge. Various European honeybee and other natural products have been proposed as novel therapeutic agents to address this problem. However, little has been known about the potential of Australian native bee honey as an antimicrobial agent.

A study led by Dr Kenya Fernandes from the University of Sydney has now demonstrated the remarkable antimicrobial properties of honey produced by three species of native Australian stingless bees: Tetragonula carbonariaTetragonula hockingsi, and Austroplebeia australis.

Commonly referred to as “sugarbag bees”, the honey from these species has historically served as a food source. It is also a traditional remedy for ailments like itchy skin and sores among Indigenous communities in Australia.

The new research reveals stingless bee honey possesses antimicrobial properties that remain effective even after heat treatment and long-term storage. These distinctive features set it apart from honey from honeybees, highlighting its potential as a sustainable, natural agent for combating drug-resistant infections.

The study has been published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, published by the American Society for Microbiology.

Dr Fernandes said: “Given the growing medical challenge of antimicrobial resistance, our findings suggest stingless bee honey could complement, or provide a valuable alternative to, synthetic antibiotics.”

Unlike honey from the European honeybee (Apis mellifera), which often relies on hydrogen peroxide for its antimicrobial effects, the honey from Australian stingless bees exhibits high levels of both hydrogen peroxide and non-peroxide activity – making it robust and versatile as a potential therapeutic agent.

The research found when hydrogen peroxide was removed the honey displayed antimicrobial activity, suggesting this is intrinsic to the honey itself.

Dr Fernandes said: “Manuka honey from honeybees displays strong non-peroxide antimicrobial activity, which is one reason why its production has been a commercial success. However, that is largely reliant on the source of its nectar from specific myrtle plants (Leptospermum).

“In contrast, the persistent antimicrobial activity of heat-treated, non-peroxide honey from stingless Australian bees across diverse locations and nectar sources suggests there is something special about these bees, rather than just nectar, that plays a critical role here.”

Co-author Professor Dee Carter said: “We discovered the antimicrobial activity is consistent across all sugarbag samples tested, unlike honeybee honey, which can vary significantly based on seasonal changes and floral sources.”

The researchers hope this consistency could enhance the potential for commercial medical applications.

However, challenges remain concerning scalability. Each stingless beehive produces about half a litre of honey a year, presenting a challenge for large-scale production.

Co-author Dr Ros Gloag said: “While the yield is small, these hives require less maintenance than traditional beehives, allowing beekeepers to manage larger numbers. With proper incentives, such as commercial value for the honey, it's feasible to cultivate more hives, providing a pathway for commercial scalability.”

Encouragingly, native stingless bee honey last year gained approval from Food Standards Australia New Zealand, paving the way for national and international commercialisation. This regulatory support holds promise for the establishment of a niche market for high-value, small-quantity products.

The antimicrobial properties of stingless bee honey have garnered attention not only for their effectiveness but also for their potential stability over time. Furthermore, earlier studies have highlighted that microbes generally do not develop resistance to honey, unlike conventional antibiotics that often operate on a singular mechanism. This offers a compelling argument for incorporating stingless bee honey into therapeutic frameworks, the researchers say.

The research team aims to explore non-peroxide activity further to understand its sources and implications.

Dr Fernandes said: “While we have yet to test the honeys against drug-resistant bacteria specifically, the presence of multiple antimicrobial factors significantly reduces the likelihood of resistance developing.”

Dr Fernandes is an Australian Research Council DECRA Fellow in the School of Life and Environmental Sciences at the University of Sydney. She is also a member of the Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute and the Centre for Drug Discovery Innovation.

## ENDS ##

Native bee hives [VIDEO] | 


Bee hives of Australian native bee species Tetragonula carbonaria.

DOWNLOAD photo of Dr Kenya Fernandes and native honeybees at this link.

RESEARCH

Fernandes, K. et al ‘Strong antimicrobial activity and unique physiochemical characteristics in honey from Australian stingless bees Tetragonula carbonariaTetragonula hockingsi and Austroplebeia australis’ (Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2025)
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02523-24

DECLARATION

The authors declare no competing interests. Research was supported by the NSW Bushfire Industry Recovery Package Sector Development Grant and by seed funding from Fungisphere within the Sydney Infectious Diseases Institute.

 

Light as a feather nanomaterial extracts drinking water from air




An international scientific collaboration has developed a novel nanomaterial to efficiently harvest clean drinking water from water vapor in the air



University of New South Wales





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE An international scientific collaboration has developed a novel nanomaterial to efficiently harvest clean drinking water from water vapour in the air.

The nanomaterial can hold more than three times its weight in water and can achieve this far quicker than existing commercial technologies, features that enable its potential in direct applications for producing potable water from the air.

The collaboration is led by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Carbon Science and Innovation (ARC COE-CSI) UNSW Associate Professor Rakesh Joshi and Nobel Laureate Professor Sir Kostya Novoselov.

Prof Joshi is based at the School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales (UNSW). Prof Novoselov is based at the National University of Singapore.  

United Nations report estimates that 2.2 billion people lack safely managed drinking water.

On Earth, there is about 13 million gigalitres of water suspend in the atmosphere (Sydney harbour holds 500 gigalitres). While that is only a fraction of the total water on Earth, it still amounts to a substantial source of fresh water.

“Our technology will have application in any region where we have sufficient humidity but limited access to or availability of clean potable water,” Dr Joshi says.

Prof Novoselov says, “This is an excellent example of how interdisciplinary, global collaboration can lead to practical solutions to one of the world’s most pressing problems—access to clean water.”

The research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS).

Finding magic in the bonding

The novel nanomaterial is based on the well-studied form of the graphene oxide, which is a single atom thick carbon lattice functionalized with oxygen containing groups. Graphene oxide has good water adsorption properties, which are properties that enable water to bond to the surface of a material.

Calcium also has good water adsorption properties. The research team decided to see what happened if you intercalate calcium ions (Ca2+) into the graphene oxide.

What happened was unexpected.

An important characteristic of materials that effectively adsorb water is strong hydrogen bonds between the water and the material it adsorbs onto, something that graphene oxide and calcium each have. The stronger the hydrogen bond, the more a material can adsorb water.

But some magic happens when you intercalate calcium to the oxygen in the graphene oxide.

In calcium-intercalated graphene oxide, it is the synergy between calcium and oxygen that facilitates the extraordinary adsorption of water.

What the research team discovered is that the way the calcium coordinates with the oxygen in the graphene changes the strength of the hydrogen bonds between the water and the calcium to make those bonds even stronger.

“We measured the amount of water adsorbed onto graphene oxide by itself and we measured X. We measured the amount of water adsorbed onto calcium itself and we got Y. When we measured the amount of water adsorbed onto the calcium-intercalated graphene oxide we got much more than X+Y. Or it is like 1+1 equals a number larger than 2,” says Xiaojun (Carlos) Ren, UNSW School of Materials Science and Engineering and first author on the paper.

“This stronger than expected hydrogen bonding is one of the reasons for the material’s extreme ability to adsorb water,” he says.

It’s also light as a feather

There was one more design tweak the team did to enhance the material’s water adsorbing ability – they made the calcium-intercalated graphene oxide in the form of an aerogel, one of the lightest solid materials known.

Aerogels are riddled with micro- to nanometre-sized pores giving them a massive surface area, which helps this aerogel form adsorb water far quicker than the standard graphene oxide.

The aerogel also gives the material sponge-like properties that make the desorption process, or release of the water from the membrane, easier.

“The only energy this system requires is the small amount needed to heat the system to about 50 degrees to release the water from the aerogel,” says Prof Daria Andreeva, the co-author of the paper.

The power of the supercomputer

The research is based on experimental and theoretical work that relied on the Australian National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) supercomputer in Canberra.

Professor Amir Karton from the University of New England led the computational work to provide the crucial understanding of the underlying mechanism.

“The modelled simulations done on the supercomputer explained the complex synergistic interactions at the molecular level, and these insights now help to design even better systems for atmospheric water generation, offering a sustainable solution to the growing challenge of fresh water availability in regional Australia and in water-stressed regions across the globe,” says Prof Karton.

The power of science without borders

This is still a fundamental research discovery that needs further development. Industry have collaborated on this project to help scale up this technology and develop a prototype for testing.

“What we have done is uncover the fundamental science behind the moisture adsorption process and the role of hydrogen bonding. This knowledge will help provide clean drinking water to a large proportion of those 2.2 billion people that lack access to it, demonstrating the societal impact by collaborative research from our Centre,” says COE-CSI Director and one of the coauthors on the paper, Prof Liming Dai.

The research is a global collaboration between research groups from Australia, China, Japan, Singapore and India.

More information

Gleick, P. H., 1996: Water resources. In Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather, ed. by S. H. Schneider, Oxford University Press, New York, vol. 2, pp. 817-823. Via https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/atmosphere-and-water-cycle

 

Protecting aquatic ecosystems by better understanding toxicity risk






University of Queensland





Australian scientists have pioneered a new method to assess the long-term risks posed by toxicants such as insecticides in rivers and the ocean.

The Temporal Response Surface (TRS) method developed by researchers at The University of Queensland can be applied to chemicals that exhibit cumulative or delayed toxicity, including the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid which is used in agriculture.

PhD candidate Cath Neelamraju from UQ’s School of the Environment said the method helps to address an important regulatory gap, ensuring environmental protections are better aligned with real-world ecological risks.

“Existing regulatory guidelines may be underestimating the ecological risks of prolonged exposure to these kinds of chemicals,” Ms Neelamraju said.

“Imidacloprid binds to the neural receptors in aquatic insects and crustaceans and its toxic effects intensify over time, even at lower concentrations.

“The impact of this pesticide is being underestimated because current guidelines do not account for the progression of toxicity over extended periods.”

Previous research has raised concerns that imidacloprid concentrations in some Queensland waterways have the potential to impact aquatic life, altering community structure and function.

The TRS method offers a practical solution by integrating exposure duration into ecosystem protection guidelines to better support long-term protection.

It aligns with established risk assessment frameworks, such as the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality and the European Water Framework Directive.

Associate Professor Ryan Turner, Director of the Reef Catchments Science Partnership said the work of the UQ team was world-leading.

“The TRS approach represents a major step toward more appropriate environmental guidelines for chemicals with cumulative or delayed toxicity, helping to better protect aquatic ecosystems both in Australia and globally,” Dr Turner said.

"There is already interest from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment to explore its relevance in a European context, where long-term risks from toxicants in waterways are a critical concern."

The researchers plan to explore how the TRS method can be applied to other toxicants with cumulative effects, including organophosphorus insecticides, other neonicotinoids, and mercury.

The method may also be expanded to account for additional environmental stressors such as pH fluctuations and temperature changes.

The method was developed in collaboration with researchers from the Queensland Government Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation and the University of Sydney.

The research is published in Environmental Science & Technology