Sunday, July 13, 2025

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

Last week the US Congress passed the Trump Tax Cuts. The mainstream media and economists have been mostly reporting the details of the cuts—i.e. which taxes got cut in the 2025 Act, how much accrued to businesses and wealthy as opposed to the rest of us, what’s the impact on GDP and maybe even government deficits and debt. All interesting facts. But not the most important. They purposely ignore the cuts in historical perspective and the bigger picture they represent.

That bigger picture is the looming fiscal crisis driven by the growing convergence of runaway tax cutting since 2001, chronic escalating defense and war spending, more frequent deeper crashes of the economy with slower economic growth between, and now since 2022 accelerating trillion dollar annual interest costs on the US national debt.

The US national debt is on track to reach $38 trillion by year end 2025. Interest payments to bondholders are already exceeding $1 trillion a year. The Congressional Budget Office, research arm of the US Congress, estimates the national debt will reach $56 trillion by 2034 with interest payments of $1.7 trillion—and all that before Trump’s just passed $5 trillion tax cuts.

Moreover, the US elite today show no sign of addressing the coming fiscal crash. It continues to cut taxes by $trillions on corporations, investors and wealthiest 1% households; to raise spending on the Pentagon, wars and other ‘defense’; to allow health insurance and big Pharma to gouge the US Treasury; and to pay holders of US securities—foreign and US—trillions of dollars more every year.

Multiple studies show that historically 60% of the US budget deficits and thus national debt are due to insufficient tax revenues—from chronic tax cutting, slow economic growth, legal avoidance and fraud. Here’s some interesting facts about cumulative tax cuts by both political parties together since 2001:

Cumulative Tax Cutting 2001-2025

George W. Bush’s tax cuts in 2001-03 amounted to $3.8 trillion over the decade 2001-10. Estimates are roughly 80% accrued to corporations, businesses, and wealthy individuals by focusing overwhelmingly on individual income tax rates, corporate capital gains and dividends, and the estate tax affecting the wealthiest 1% or less households. Bush then cut taxes in the spring of 2008 by another $180 billion as the economy began to slide into recession and the great crash of 2008-09.

When Obama took over in 2009 his American Rescue Plan stimulus for the economy passed that March provided for another $325 billion in tax cuts. His entire stimulus plan was $787 billion, another $280 billion of the remaining $487 billion went to the states which then hoarded most of it. So less than $200 billion went to stimulate consumption which immediately proved too little to reboot the US economy. He had to add another $25 billion for ‘cash for auto clunkers’ and another $25B for ‘first time home buyers’ later that year. Most of the latter, moreover, didn’t go to home buyers but to mortgage lenders as incentive to approve more mortgages.

When Bush’s tax cuts came up for renewal in 2010, Obama extended them for another two years through 2012. That amounted to another $803 billion in tax cuts, again mostly to wealthy and corporations.

In August 2011, in an agreement with the Republican Congress, Obama cut social program spending by $1.5 trillion in a new ‘austerity’ plan. $1 trillion was cut in just education and other social programs; $.5 trillion was supposed to be cut for defense spending but was kicked down the road and never applied. Austerity social program cuts always follow crisis bailouts. They did in 2011 after the 2009-10 bailouts. They’re occurring again today in 2025 after the 2020-21 Covid bailouts—more on which shortly.

The 2012 Obama tax cuts made the Bush tax cuts permanent. They cost another $5 trillion. They were supposed to avoid what the media, lobbyists, and propagandists called the pending ‘fiscal cliff’. They were supposed to boost the economy. They didn’t. US economic growth in GDP terms for the rest of the Obama term averaged only 60% of what was historically average during recovery periods from the earlier 10 US recessions since 1948.

Obama thus cut taxes on wealthy and corporations more than Bush did. To restate: Bush cut by $4 trillion ($3.8 trillion + $180 billion). Obama cut by $325 billion (’09) + $803 billion (’10-11) then by $5 trillion (2012). That’s $4 trillion (Bush) and $6.1 trillion (Obama). Then came Trump’s $4.5 trillion in 2018.

Trump promised during the 2016 election to cut taxes by $5 trillion. And he roughly did. The 2018 tax cut over the next decade cost $4.5 trillion.

His administration, with the media and professional economist class in tow, estimated the $4.5 trillion at only $1.9 trillion. Trump’s Treasury Secretary at the time, Steve Mnuchin, even publicly declared the Trump tax cuts would ‘pay for themselves’. By that he meant the tax cuts would boost US GDP and the economy so much that economic growth would result in a rise in so much more tax revenues over the decade that would offset the $1.9T. To quote Mnuchin at the time: “we believe the tax cuts will pay for themselves over a 10 year period of time” (Reuters, 2-12-20).

Proof that the Trump 2018 tax cuts were $4.5T—not $1.9T—was reflected in the Trump administration’s budget forecast and a US federal deficit reduction of $4.6 trillion over the decade 2018-28.  An even more convincing later piece of evidence was the US Congressional Budget Office, the research arm of Congress, that estimated in 2025 that the cost of the 2018 tax cuts were at least $4 trillion total!

For several years in debates with professional mainstream economists like Robert Reich and Paul Krugman this writer kept showing the Trump tax cuts weren’t $1.9 trillion but actually $4.5 trillion. Here’s how:

First, the $1.9 trillion official estimate was based on the assumption that the US economy would grow over the next ten years, 2018-28, by 3%-3.5% annually. A forecast that proved grossly inaccurate in fact.  

After a modest growth in 2018-19, the US economy crashed in 2020 as the government ordered a partial economic shutdown in response to Covid. The economy haltingly reopened and recovered in stages in 2021. Thereafter it grew only moderately from 2022-24.

That modest three year GDP recovery followed the massive $10.7 trillion fiscal and monetary stimulus by Congress and the Federal Reserve during the years 2020-22: $6.7 trillion in fiscal stimulus and another $4 trillion in monetary stimulus by the Federal Reserve Bank. In other words, a mountain of stimulus brought forth a molehill of GDP.

Second, the 2018 tax cut estimate grossly under-estimated and failed to account for the magnitude of tax cuts that accrued to US multinational corporations offshore.

The largest 108 US Fortune 500 corporations with offshore subsidiaries had accumulated $2.7 trillion in their corporate offshore accounts they weren’t returning to the US in order to avoid paying the then 35% corporate tax rate. Estimates of un-repatriated hoarded profits from the offshore operations of US multinationals were as high as $4 to $5 trillion. Trump’s 2018 tax cuts allowed them to bring back those profits and pay only 10%. That’s a 25% tax saving on at least $4 trillion. The US Commerce Dept. estimated in 2020 US multinationals brought back only $750 billion in 2018 and another $250 billion in 2019. They thus paid 10% or $100 billion instead of 35% or $350 billion. They pocketed the other $900 billion of the $1 trillion repatriated. No government records were kept after 2019 unfortunately.

What did they do with the $900 billion they did repatriate? As the Wall St. Journal reported on January 28, 2020: “Much of what firms retrieved went to buybacks”. After averaging about $125 billion per quarter in 2017, S&P 500 stock buybacks surged to $200 billion per quarter in 2018 and 2019.

And what happened to the other roughly $3-$4 trillion plus US corporations never repatriated? They hoarded the remaining $3 to $4 trillion profits in their offshore subsidiaries to avoid taxes. Another loophole allowed them to convert their cash profits from overseas operations into short term financial securities held offshore, on which they didn’t have to pay any profits.

And there was another way they avoided taxes: they manipulated their internal pricing—i.e. what US located operations charged or paid their foreign subsidiaries. They paid their foreign subsidiaries higher prices for components or final products, thereby shifting profits offshore where they were booked at lower tax rates, which also raised costs in the US and thus lower profits taxed at the higher rate.  

The 2018 Trump tax act also raised the amount US multinational corps paid to foreign countries that they could then deduct from their US taxes owed.

The point is these offshore rules and loopholes that grossly reduced the total tax cuts by at least $2 trillion over ten years, 2018-28, that were grossly under-estimated or were not accounted for in the 2018 Trump official $1.9 trillion tax cut cost estimates.

In summary, phony assumptions about a decade of future GDP growth, reduced taxation on repatriated profits, and loopholes reducing taxes due on their offshore subsidiary operations all meant US multinational corporations’ tax cuts were far greater than reported. These assumptions and loopholes meant the 2018 cuts were $4.5 trillion not the ‘official’ $1.9 trillion.

Thus total tax cuts for 2001-19 were $14.6 trillion.

Thereafter followed the 2020 Covid fiscal stimulus package during Trump’s last year in office, 2020. Taxes were cut  another $950 billion as part of the ‘CARES Act’ fiscal stimulus passed by Congress March 2020 and another $260 billion in tax cutting in the emergency ‘Consolidated Appropriations Act’ passed that December as the US economy faltered again.

That $1.2 trillion in 2020 tax cuts was followed in 2021 by Biden’s subsequent ‘AMERICAN RELIEF PLAN’ fiscal stimulus which cut taxes by a further $640 billion.

In 2022 Biden thereafter shifted some of the unspent relief for social programs in his American Relief Plan and redirected the funds to a new round of three business investment stimulus programs costing $1.7 trillion: the Infrastructure Act, the Chips & Modernization Act, and the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act which was mostly tax cuts and subsidies to energy companies, alternative and fossil fuel. Those three 2022 business investment Acts together cut taxes by another roughly $500 billion.

Adding all the tax cuts from 2001 thru 2024, both parties—two Republican and two Democrat administrations— together cut taxes by almost $17 trillion!

No one should therefore be surprised that Trump 2025 is cutting taxes again by another $5 trillion—and once more mostly for business, investors and wealthiest households. A massive tax cutting has been going on for a quarter century since 2001. (One can argue the trend extends even further back, to Reagan’s 1981 and 1986 tax cuts and Clinton’s 1997-98 cuts).

It’s all part of the long term Neoliberal era (1979-present) fiscal policy: cut taxes on the rich and their corporations, offset the cost of the tax cuts in part with social spending program cuts, increase spending on defense and wars, and ignore the effects of all that on budget deficits and national debt that result in rising interest payments to US bondholders to $1 trillion dollars per year.

Long term historical studies show conclusively that tax cuts, and reduced tax revenues from slow economic growth, fraud, legal avoidance, are responsible for 60% of budget deficits.

The other major forces driving US budget deficits and national debt since 2001 are the $9 trillion spent on foreign wars in the first quarter of the 21st century; the two big bailouts of 2008-09 ($787 billion +)and 2020 ($3.1 billion) and 2021 ($1.9 billion); the chronic price gouging by health and insurance corporations escalating the costs of government health support programs (Medicare, Medicaid, Schip, ACA); and rising interest payments on the national debt to investors (US and foreign) purchasing US Treasury securities.

So loss of tax revenue from 25 years of tax cuts and slower long term economic growth ($17 trillion), the $9 trillion thrown away in forever wars since 2001, the bailout costs ($5.8 trillion), and healthcare price gouging ($0.5 trillion?) together explain most of the current $36.2 trillion US national debt.

In short, a fiscal train wreck has been running down the tracks for at least the past 25 years and Trump’s $5 trillion ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ (BBB)—along with $trillions more for defense and wars—are shifting that train into another higher gear.

Trump, Budget Deficits and National Debt

US budget deficits have been averaging $2 trillion annually and rising since 2016. They are projected to rise another $2 trillion in 2025 even before Trump’s tax cuts take effect this year.

The national debt is just the accumulation of annual budget deficits. In 2000 the US national debt was $5.6 trillion. After eight more years it nearly doubled to $10.7 trillion. It then did double under Obama to $20 trillion by end of 2016. Trump added $7.8 trillion in the four years of his first term and Biden added another $8.5 trillion in just four years more. By the end of his Biden’s term in December 2024 the national debt had risen to $36.2 trillion.

By the way, as that rises to $38 trillion by year end 2025 and $56 trillion by 2034, it does not include the Federal Reserve Bank’s balance sheet debt (now $8 trillion) or state and local governments’ debt load of several trillions$ more.

Future Consequences

It’s ironic Trump has chosen to call his tax cuts and defense spending hikes proposal the Big Beautiful Bill—or BBB as Congress refers to it. For in the world of business finance, BBB refers to the worst run corporations that are overloaded with high risk debt (triple B grade). Triple B rating makes them the most financially fragile and at greatest risk of default and bankruptcy.

While it’s not likely the USA federal government can ever go bankrupt or even default on its annual payments of $1 to $1.7 trillion to bondholders of the national debt. All it needs do is ‘print’ more money, either by adding accounts to the Federal Reserve electronically—or perhaps in the near future by creating digital currency. But while that may not mean bankruptcy, it could very well mean a collapse of the value of the US dollar globally. That in turn could result in the abandonment of the dollar as the global reserve and trading currency. And that in a collapse of the recycling of US dollars back to the USA by foreign holders of excess dollars. In such case, the US annual budget can’t be financed, requiring then massive spending cuts and tax hikes. In other words, the end of the US global empire.

Trump’s tax cuts and spending bill is just another iteration of Neoliberal fiscal policy, this time on steroids. But Neoliberal fiscal policy is broken. That is, it does not produce the same stimulus to the real economy, real investment, and GDP growth that it had in decades past.  Increasing magnitudes of fiscal stimulus is required in order to generate the same, or even smaller, real GDP growth.

What fiscal policy does result in increasingly is a stimulus to financial asset markets, in US and globally, and thus a continued rise in stocks, bonds, forex, derivatives and other financial instruments’ price. Or the tax cuts are redirected by multinational corporations that receive them to offshore investment and operations. In other words, to subsidize the expansion of US capital expansion offshore. Both the financialization and globalization of investment are characteristic of trends in the 21st century capitalist economy. A similar effect applies to US monetary policy: more and more of the Federal Reserve’s injection of money into the economy gets diverted to financial markets and to offshore.

Perhaps the best evidence of this is the $10.7 trillion in fiscal and monetary stimulus by Congress and the Federal Reserve injected in 2020-22. It should have produced a massive GDP growth expansion in 2022-24. It produced a mere historical average of barely 2%.

All of the media, economists, and government officials’ about the Trump tax cuts and BBB Act stimulating the real economy—i.e. wages, jobs, investment, etc.—is just economic hype. The 2018 tax cuts didn’t. Nor did Obama’s and Bush’s before that. Trump’s current BBB Act won’t do any different.

Fiscal and monetary policy in the late Neoliberal era—in the 21st century American capitalism and global economic empire—are failing.  Nevertheless, America’s elite are doubling down on their tax cutting for the rich and their wars of defense of Empire.Email

avatar

Dr. Jack Rasmus, Ph.D Political Economy, teaches economics at St. Mary’s College in California. He is the author and producer of the various nonfiction and fictional workers, including the books The Scourge of Neoliberalism: US Economic Policy From Reagan to Bush, Clarity Press, October 2019. Jack is the host of the weekly radio show, Alternative Visions, on the Progressive Radio Network, and a journalist writing on economic, political and labor issues for various magazines, including European Financial Review, World Financial Review, World Review of Political Economy, ‘Z‘ magazine, and others.

Source: The Next Recession

Every year, I do a post on the inequality of global wealth using the annual data compiled by economists working for the Swiss bank, Credit Suisse.  But Credit Suisse is now no more, swept away by scandal and the banking crisis of 2023.  The other major Swiss bank, UBS, took over the assets of CS and now produces its own annual Global Wealth report.  It’s not so clear and useful as the CS ones were, but nevertheless, it still produces a global wealth pyramid, as below.

The wealth pyramid shows that just 60m adults, or 1.6% of all world’s adults, have net personal wealth of $226 trn, or 48.1% of all the world’s personal wealth.  At the other extreme, 1.57bn adults (around 41% of the world’s adults) have only $2.7trn, or just 0.6% of all the world’s personal wealth!  This result matches closely the estimate of the World Inequality Lab, which finds that 50% of the world’s population (not just adults) have only 0.9% of total personal wealth. 

And that the top 1% of world’s population have about 42% of all personal wealth, the same as in 1995.

Indeed, if we add in the middle rung of wealth holders in the UBS pyramid, it turns out that 3.1bn adults (or 82% of all adults) have personal wealth of $61trn, or just 12.7% of total global personal wealth.  The other 87.3% is owned by just 680m adults or just 18.2% of the total number of adults in the world (3.8bn).  At the very top of the pyramid, there are 2,891 dollar billionaires in the world, with just 31 adults having a fortune of over $50bn each.

In 2024, personal wealth rose most in Eastern Europe (from a low level) and North America, but fell in Latin America, Western Europe and Oceania (Australia etc).  Average household wealth in Britain fell 3.6% in 2024, the second largest drop of any major economy.

The rise in North America was mainly due to the rise in the value of stocks and bonds for the very rich. Globally, total financial wealth leapt 6.2%, while non-financial wealth (property) expanded just 1.7%.  Average personal wealth per adult in North America is nearly six times higher than in China, 12 times higher than in Eastern Europe; and nearly 20 times higher than in Latin America.

According to the UBS report, the extreme inequality of personal wealth globally has worsened (if only slightly) since the start of the 21st century.  Post-apartheid South Africa remains top of the world league for inequality of wealth as measured by the gini coefficient for inequality, followed as always by Brazil.  And that gini ratio has worsened significantly during the Long Depression since 2008.  Of the advanced capitalist economies, Sweden has the most unequal distribution of personal wealth, something that may surprise those who praise social democratic Scandinavia.  The US is as unequal as Sweden.

Remember these are measures of wealth, ie what is owned net of debt by each adult globally.  The pyramid is not a measure of personal income inequality.  But I have found in previous analyses that wealth and income are closely related. There is a positive correlation of about 0.38 between wealth and income; in other words, the higher the inequality of personal wealth in an economy, the more likely is it that the inequality of income will be higher.

Inequality analysts like Gabriel Zucman and Saez echo Marx’s view when they say that “progressive income taxation cannot solve all our injustices. But if history is any guide, it can help stir the country in the right direction, …. Democracy or plutocracy: That is, fundamentally, what top tax rates are about.”  But having said that, the cause of high and rising inequality is to be found in the process of capital accumulation itself.  It is not primarily the lack of progressive taxation of incomes or the lack of a wealth tax; or even the lack of intervention to deal with tax havens.  Such policy measures would certainly help to reduce inequality and deliver badly needed government revenue.  But if pre-tax income from capital (profit, rent and interest) continues to rise at the expense of income from labour (wages), then there is a built-in tendency for inequality to rise. And if capital continues to accumulate, then those that own the bulk of it will get richer compared to those who own no capital. Rising global inequality will not be reversed by a redistribution of wealth or income through taxation alone.  It will require a complete restructuring of the ownership and control of the means of production and resources globally. Email

Michael Roberts worked in the City of London as an economist for over 40 years. He has closely observed the machinations of global capitalism from within the dragon’s den. At the same time, he was a political activist in the labour movement for decades. Since retiring, he has written several books: The Great Recession – a Marxist view (2009); The Long Depression (2016); Marx 200: a review of Marx’s economics (2018); and jointly with Guglielmo Carchedi as editors of World in Crisis (2018). He has published numerous papers in various academic economic journals and articles in leftist publications.


Richest 1% People Have Enough New Wealth to End Annual Poverty 22 Times Over


By Shobha Shukla
July 11, 2025  
   Source:

 Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

Activists from various climate groups in solidarity with the uprising of Letzten Generation (Last Generation) block the road to the Ministry of Transport. Invalidenpark, Berlin, November 18th, 2022 | Image by Stefan Müller via wikimediacommons

Recent funding cuts on health, gender equality and human rights have given a sudden blow to a range of important services for the most underserved communities. But solution is not as simple as suggesting low- and middle-income countries to increase ‘domestic investment on health and gender’ or find ‘innovative ways to financing.’

Global North nations have plundered wealth and resources from the Global South. We need redistributive justice and a range of tax reforms keeping people in the Global South central. We need to reform global financial architecture using the foundation of development justice – so to fully fund gender equality and human right to health with equity and justice. Countries in the Global South should not be servicing debt and paying the rich nations but rather investing in delivering on all health, gender and other goals enshrined in SDGs.

The latest Oxfam report which was released at 4th UN Financing for Development meet in Seville, Spain, shows that since 2015 the top 1% people in the world have amassed US$ 33.9 Trillion in new wealth which is enough to end annual poverty 22 times over.

We need health responses to be fully funded, of course, but we also have to ensure that equity and justice guides us on how we use those resources so that we are able to first serve those farthest behind or most likely to be left behind.

It is not the absence of science-based tools that has failed the global south on responding to key health epidemics, be it infectious diseases or non-communicable diseases, but deep-rooted inequities and injustices that plague our so-called world order.

If we are to deliver on promises enshrined in SDG3 related to HIV and TB and other health issues, we must strengthen competencies and capacities in the Global South – and reduce dependencies on the Global North.

Celebrating 25+ years of struggle and leadership of NMP+

Network of Maharashtra People Living with HIV (NMP+) was established over 25 years ago. Since last two decades it champions a social enterprise model to reduce dependency on donor-driven funding for HIV prevention, treatment, care and support services.

Famous German film and TV actress Annabelle Mandeng has been a supporter of movements of people living with HIV and human rights for over two decades now. She has also hosted events like the artists against AIDS gala in Berlin. Speaking at an Affiliated Independent Event organised ahead of 13th International AIDS Society (IAS) Conference on HIV Science (IAS 2025), Annabelle Mandeng said: “When I read about NMP plus, the immortal words of Margaret Mead come to my mind: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.” Over 50,000 people living with HIV from all gender diversities can live a life of rights and human dignity – thanks to NMP+.”

Annabelle Mandeng added that “NMP+ has helped people with HIV to care for each other as well as rise collectively to improve HIV responses in their state. Congratulations to Manoj Pardeshi and NMP+ for developing and leveraging social enterprise approaches for the last two decades so that NMP+ can be less dependent on external funding. TAAL+ or a “Treatment, Adherence, Advocacy, Literacy” is a community-run pharmacy based on social enterprise that has been up and running since 2006. TAAL is a shining example today for other civil societies to inspire them to use social enterprise and become self reliant. It is the first ever community-led e pharmacy in India. Over the years, it has transitioned into an integrated healthcare centre as well as managing an online or e-commerce platform since 2023. It offers in-person and online consultation, counselling as well as quality assured and affordable lifesaving medicines for HIV, STI and other co- infections and co-morbidities. Screening for infectious and non-communicable diseases is also provided along with a linkage to care services. Over 3,200 people receive life-saving anti-retroviral therapy along with other care services. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and other HIV prevention tools are also available via TAAL+.”

Dr Bharat Bhushan Rewari who served at senior levels with Indian government’s national AIDS control programme and led the rollout of lifesaving antiretroviral therapy for several years since its beginning on 7 April 2004, said that “World has achieved major progress in its response to HIV/AIDS epidemic with significant reduction in new infections, AIDS-related death and improving lives of people living with HIV. Community has played a big role in this journey especially in empowering people living with HIV and reducing stigma and discrimination. NMP+ is one such organisation which started working for people living with HIV early on (in 2000) when stigma was high and access to treatment was an issue. NMP+ provided a platform for people living with HIV to support each other, and foster self-esteem. Over the years, it has worked tirelessly to uphold dignity and rights of people living with HIV. Their work has helped transform AIDS-related stigma into self-confidence, fear into hope and shame into self-respect. It has worked closely with the government to raise treatment literacy. Today NMP+ proudly stands as a symbol of resilience and a voice for people living with HIV and vulnerable communities.”

David Bridger, UNAIDS Country Director for India, said: “Today we celebrate 25 years of hard work and progress made possible by NMP+ but at the same time reflect on what we still need to achieve to truly end AIDS as a public health threat. I think today is also really important for us to reflect and recognise that efforts of NMP+ have not only supported people living with HIV, but they have also transformed public health approaches globally. Putting people at the centre is now an approach widely accepted.”

One of the key brains behind TAAL+ is Manoj Pardeshi – a founding member of NMP+ and also of National Coalition of People Living with HIV in India (NCPI+): “In those initial years, there was no funding. Later donors came but their funding was as per their own respective mandates, while the needs of the community could be different. So we thought of having a separate funding mechanism that would cater to our unmet needs. That is how TAAL became a social entrepreneur model.”

Manoj shared that two decades ago, they could barely have an action plan for 3 or 6 months and then at most for a year. “We never thought that we would complete 25 years one day.”

Hope lies in the people, not FfD4

The 4th International Conference on Financing for Development was recently held in Seville, Spain with the intent to reform financing at all levels, including reform of the international financial architecture and to address the financing challenges preventing the investment push for the SDGs.

But this meet only served the interest of the rich (and rich nations). It failed to restructure the global economy and financial system, so as to benefit all equitably, including women, girls and all gender diverse peoples. This was said by experts at a recently concluded SHE & Rights session on World Population Day.

It looked into women and girls as merely ‘economic potentials’ for ‘economic benefits’ without really addressing the fundamental barriers to gender justice, including labour rights, safeguards for corporate abuses and preventing gender-based violence in the workplace.

It failed to guarantee long-term, flexible, inclusive, equitable financing for development.

The hope lies in the people of the Global South – to hold the North accountable and ensure sustainable development with human rights and justice becomes a reality for all.

Shobha Shukla is the award-winning founding Managing Editor and Executive Director of CNS (Citizen News Service) and is a feminist, health and development justice advocate. She is a former senior Physics faculty of prestigious Loreto Convent College and current Coordinator of Asia Pacific Regional Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media) and Chairperson of Global AMR Media Alliance (GAMA received AMR One Health Emerging Leaders and Outstanding Talents Award 2024). She also coordinates SHE & Rights initiative (Sexual health with equity & rights). Follow her on Twitter @shobha1shukla or read her writings here
www.bit.ly/ShobhaShukla


Email

Shobha ShuklaWebsite
X (Twitter)\

From Autoworker Heaven to Immigration Hellscape

Source: Liberation Road Notes

Twenty years ago, I retired to Naples, Florida, along with seven of my United Auto Workers caucus members at General Motors, Framingham. Others from our plant went to southwest Florida as well. We picked that spot because Walter and Victor Reuther had built a fishing camp outside Fort Myers in the early 1960s. It became a mecca for union members thereafter. Once there we ran into other auto workers, mostly from Detroit. Thanks to retirement pay, first negotiated in 1949, UAW workers could afford a vacation home.

It turns out we loved southwest Florida. It is true you can roll a penny from Naples to Miami. But along the way you learn to appreciate the subtlety of the Everglades. In its own way it matches the majesty of the White Mountains in New Hampshire. In the early 2000s, southwest Florida was still “old Florida.” There were lots of 1950s motels with jalousie windows and ceiling fans. Flamingos—plastic and real—littered the lawns of the area’s motels and tiny cottages. The mansions of Jeff Bezos, Rick Scott, and the like were still 10 years in the future.

Now my paradise is a hellscape of white supremacy, Christian authoritarianism, toxic misogyny, purposeful cruelty, eugenics, great replacement theory, and worse. Florida, it seems, wants to win the race to the bottom.

Not So Fast, Texas: We Want Camps Too

To much hoopla and fanfare, on July 1st, Alligator Alcatraz was opened in Ochopee, Florida, smack dab in the middle of the fragile Everglades. It is a 5,000-bed facility consisting of rows of bunk beds behind chain link cages. Alligator Alcatraz fits the classic definition of a concentration camp: mass civilian detention without trials, targeting vulnerable groups for political gain based on identity rather than for crimes committed. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem notes that the camp is meant to encourage immigrants to self-deport before ending up there–echoing early Nazi dreams that German Jews would self-deport.

April through December (the subtropical rainy season) is the notorious hurricane season, peaking in September. Mosquitos swarm. It is impossible to swat them away. Although daytime temperatures may peak at 93 degrees, they only drop to 87 at night. Humidity is an unforgiving 98 percent. Even before the first detainee arrived the camp was flooded by a regular late afternoon cloudburst. Of course, there is no infrastructure like water and sewage systems.

But there are alligators nearby. Trump gloated that the site has “a lot of cops that are in the form of alligators” and advised prisoners to run in a zig-zag motion to improve their chances of escaping by 1 percent. MAGA finds all this hilarious and worthy of merchandising. Trump’s de facto national security advisor Laura Loomer wrote that “the good news is, alligators are guaranteed at least 65 million meals if we get started now.” This is not the number of immigrants in the US—it is the entire Latino population of the country.

We’ve been here before. In the Jim Crow era, “alligator bait” was a slur that white people commonly used to refer to Black infants and children. Now we’re seeing the same racist vitriol return to dehumanize Latino and immigrant communities.

Racist postcard, c. 1910 (Source: New York Public Library Digital Collections)

Just the Beginning

Alligator Alcatraz is part of a larger detention and expulsion program, detailed in Florida’s so-called “blueprint” to use state property to quickly construct “soft-sided” housing (yes, tents) next to state-owned runways. They’re “one-stop shops,” in the words of DeSantis: “They come here, you drive them 2,000 feet to the runway and then they’re gone!” The other two are Camp Blanding in north central Florida and a yet-to-be named location in the Panhandle. Each is expected to house 2,000 people.

Alligator Alcatraz is located at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport inside the Big Cypress National Preserve in Ochopee. The Dade-Collier airport, begun in 1968, was to be the largest airport in the world. It was planned to accommodate planes like the Concorde. Flights all over the globe would land and take off there. It was an adjunct to the massive Miami-Dade airport which was already hemmed in by new neighborhoods. Construction of this Cold War vision was halted in 1970, due to massive environmental concerns. Soon afterwards, Gerald Ford created the national park surrounding it. The Ochopee site was seized by DeSantis on June 23, 2025. A mere eight days later, the tent internment camp was opened.

Camp Blanding, constructed in 1939, was the largest military facility of its kind in Florida. More than 800,000 soldiers passed through. After WWII ended it was turned into training grounds for Florida’s National Guard. The third camp, while not yet identified, will be somewhere in the Panhandle. There are at least three major military installations in Pensacola, Milton, and Fort Walton. Each has idled airstrips, called OLFs (Outlying Fields), that would fit neatly into the DeSantis vision.

These three are in addition to Krome, the notorious 30-year-old facility, on the western edge of Miami. Krome was constructed in 1960 as a missile base to counter Russian-made missiles positioned in Cuba. Left idle, in 1981 it was “repurposed” to house the Mariel Boat people (also Cuban). Krome has a long and ugly history of sexual abuse, little to no medical care, and daily rations of just one cup of rice and beans. In fact, less than a month before anybody ever heard of Alligator Alcatraz, a group of Krome detainees assembled in the patio to form a human “SOS” sign. It is estimated that between 700 and 1,700 people are detained there. Exact figures are not released.

Republican Oligarchs and Big Donors Cash In

At the top of the food chain in ICE world is Palantir, brainchild of Peter Thiel (JD Vance’s mentor/money person). It provides data software to ICE to keep track of targeted people. Started under Obama, it has recently been given an additional $30 million to develop “real time” tracking. It could further cash in on the $150 billion passed in the “Big Beautiful Bill” for military expenditures.

Alligator Alcatraz will cost $450 million a year to operate. Florida taxpayers will foot the bill until reimbursed by FEMA. It is unclear whether that reimbursement is guaranteed, however. If FEMA refunds the taxpayers, that leaves little money to bail out Floridians experiencing damage from hurricanes. By contrast, Krome is operated by Akima business systems for $685 million over 10 years. Akima is an Alaskan Native Corporation. That status allows it to secure government contracts quickly, especially those intended for small businesses.

Alligator Alcatraz has been a feast for DeSantis’s big donors. “No bid” contracts, awarded to vendors without a competitive bidding process, rule the day. There is an $18 million contract to CDR Logistics LLC—a joint venture that includes one of Ron DeSantis’s biggest campaign contributors. It is one of at least five new contracts and purchase orders totaling more than $25 million.There is also a $1.1 million dollar contract to a newly formed company, IRG Global Management, an offshoot of Access Restoration Services (ARC), to handle daily operations like sewage removal. ARC is a major donor to Florida Republicans.

The feast will continue as the two new “one-stop shops” get up and running.

Aimee Osceola, center, and hundreds of other people protested against the development of an immigration detention center, dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz," in Big Cypress National Preserve, on June 22, 2025.
Image: Daniel Varela, for Friends of the Everglades (June 22, 2025)

Resistance

When you think “resistance,” Florida doesn’t roll off the tongue. Trump won handily in Naples all three times he ran. The Congressional Representative is Byron Donalds, an election denier, and the only person to be refused entry into the Black Caucus because he denies there is racism in the US. Donalds is running for governor, since DeSantis is barred from another term.

Yet the unexpected has happened. April’s Hands Off protest in Naples drew a crowd of 7,000 or so. Prior to that demonstrations of this type could barely attract 200. No Kings in July had 1,200 or so.

In late June, Betty Osceola, a Miccosukee native and climate activist, called on organizations like the Love The Everglades Movement and Friends of the Everglades, along with other locals, to protest the facility. Alligator Alcatraz sits adjacent to Miccosukee lands. There isn’t even a breakdown shoulder on this remote part of the Tamiami Trail. This is the true/real Alligator Alley. Attempts by Congressional representatives to tour the facility have been refused. Word spread quickly and folks who came for Hands Off and No Kings joined, even though Ochopee is almost 50 miles from Naples. Hundreds of people withstood Florida heat, humidity, and mosquitos to protest this vile facility.

Camp Blanding is located in one of the most conservative rural areas of north central Florida. Dotted with cattle herds, a Lowe’s, and a few Speedways, the area is home to three of Florida’s biggest prisons. As yet no protests have materialized.

The Panhandle might prove more fertile. In the recent special election to fill the resignation of Matt Gaetz, the massive Republican majority was cut in half.

Our Duty to Struggle

What is being built now in South Florida and around the country is a system of concentration camps intended to facilitate an ethnic cleansing of Mexicano, Chicano, Latine, and immigrant communities from the United States. Trump’s huge hideous bill just gave that ethnic cleansing project an enormous boost, with $170 billion allocated to ICE over the next four years, of which $45 billion is allocated to the construction of new detention camps specifically. Not only does this make ICE the largest domestic police force in the US, it also makes it one of the largest militarized bodies internationally. With an average annual budget of $37.5 billion, ICE will spend only slightly less than the entire Canadian military ($41 billion) and slightly more than the Israeli military ($30.5 billion).

The people’s resistance to the ghoulish concentration camps, in Florida and nationwide, will matter. No matter how many billions of dollars they spend, Trump and his minions can’t build concentration camps or deport immigrants on their own; like all fascist projects, their program relies on the active compliance of millions of individuals, organizations and institutions. It is our moral and political duty to resist, contest and refuse compliance with this fascist program of ethnic cleansing using every available tool of nonviolent protest, noncooperation and intervention. Our future depends on itEmail

Elly Leary is a long-time labor activist, now retired. She was bargaining chair of her UAW local and co-chair of New Directions, the first national reform caucus. She has been a member of Liberation Road for more than 40 years.

 

Iran says it will work with IAEA but inspections may be risky

Iran plans to cooperate with the U.N. nuclear watchdog despite restrictions imposed by its parliament, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Saturday, while stressing that access to its bombed nuclear sites posed security and safety issues.

A new law passed in Iran following last month’s Israeli and U.S. bombing campaign stipulates that inspection of Iran’s nuclear sites by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) needs approval by the Supreme National Security Council, Iran’s top security body.

The Israeli and U.S. strikes targeted a nuclear programme which Western countries have long said was aimed at building an atomic weapon. Iran has long said its nuclear programme is purely peaceful.

Any negotiations over Iran’s future nuclear programme are likely to require its cooperation with the IAEA, which angered Iran last month by declaring on the eve of the Israeli strikes that Tehran was violating non-proliferation treaty commitments.

“The risk of spreading radioactive materials and the risk of exploding leftover munitions … are serious,” state media cited Araqchi as saying. “For us, IAEA inspectors approaching nuclear sites has both a security aspect … and the safety of the inspectors themselves is a matter that must be examined.”

While Iran’s cooperation with the nuclear watchdog has not stopped, it will take a new form and will be guided and managed through the Supreme National Security Council, Araqchi told Tehran-based diplomats.

“The IAEA’s requests for continued monitoring in Iran will be … decided on a case-by-case basis by the Council with consideration to safety and security issues,” Araqchi said.

Iran will not agree to any nuclear deal that does not allow it to enrich uranium, Araqchi reiterated. Iran would only agree to talks limited to its nuclear programme and not encompassing defence issues such as its missiles.

Axios cited sources on Saturday as saying Russian President Vladimir Putin had voiced support for the idea of an accord in which Tehran would bebarred from enriching uranium. Iran’s semi-official news agency Tasnim quoted an “informed source” as saying Putin had not sent any such message to Iran.

Speaking to the state news agency IRNA, Araqchi said Iran was carefully considering the details of any renewed nuclear talks with the U.S. and seeking assurances that Washington would not again resort to military force. “We are in no hurry to enter into unconsidered negotiations,” he added.

Araqchi also said any move by Britain, France and Germany to reimpose international sanctions on Iran through a so-called “snapback” mechanism under an earlier nuclear deal would “end Europe’s role” in Iran’s nuclear issue.

Under the terms of a U.N. resolution ratifying a 2015 nuclear pact, the three European powers could reimpose United Nations sanctions against Tehran by October 18, 2025.

(Reuters)