Friday, July 25, 2025

 

Study links dog breed, environment to canine obesity



Texas A&M-led research urges tailored weight management strategies for dogs and their families



Texas A&M University





Half of the dogs in the United States are reported to be overweight and, according to a new study led by Texas A&M University and the Dog Aging Project (DAP), the cause may be a complex web of interactions between dogs, their breed background, their environment and food motivation.

For example, the study found that popular sporting group breeds — such as retrievers, spaniels and setters — are about 10% more likely to be more motivated by food than other dogs. 

Meanwhile, owners are more likely to monitor their dog’s diet closely if they themselves reported that their dog was overweight, rather than if only their veterinarian recognized the dog’s overweight status, according to the recently published study, which assessed a combination of dog owner survey responses and veterinarian-reported body condition scores collected from medical records submitted through the DAP.

“Overweight dogs are prone to numerous health problems, including skin disease, diabetes, and arthritis,” said Dr. Kate Creevy, DAP chief veterinary officer and a professor in the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences’ (VMBS) Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences. 

“It is imperative that veterinarians develop a better understanding of canine obesity and whether it may be linked to social, environmental, or demographic factors so that we can give every dog the best possible quality of life,” she said.

The DAP is an initiative that studies the effects of aging and what makes a healthy canine life. To date, more than 50,000 dogs from all backgrounds have been enrolled.

Dr. Kathleen Gartner, a recent graduate of the VMBS’ Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Program, conducted research for this study as part of the college’s Veterinary Medical Scientist Research Training Program.

Understanding A Dog’s Love Of Food

While it’s no surprise that dogs love to eat, the recent study has shown that canine obesity involves many factors.

“Our study confirmed that dogs in the sporting group — which in our study group were largely Labrador retrievers and Golden retrievers — have a greater likelihood to have high food motivation,” Creevy said. “Given that these are two of the most common breeds in the U.S., it is vital that both veterinarians and dog owners understand the diet management strategies necessary for achieving a healthy weight.”

The study also found that dogs in urban environments and those from multi-dog households are more likely to have higher food motivation.

“It’s likely that these factors influence the amount of exercise that dogs get in addition to their access to food,” Creevy said. “Some dogs may seek food out of boredom, which may increase in environments where exercise and enrichment are less available. Additionally, owners with multiple dogs may choose certain feeding practices — including free feeding — out of convenience, which can lead to more food being available.”

The Importance Of Body Condition Scores

One of the primary ways that veterinarians assess weight in dogs is by using a body condition score (BCS), which compares the animal’s fat accumulation to its size. To determine BCS, a veterinarian will feel areas like the dog’s ribs and hips and then assign the dog a number on a scale of one to nine, with five being an ideal body condition.

However, the DAP’s recent study found that about a third of veterinary medical records didn’t include a BCS within the prior year. That owners were less likely than veterinarians to report their dogs as overweight may be connected to a lack of understanding BCS.

“A BCS plays a key role in helping veterinarians communicate with owners about their dog’s weight, which is why we need to continue increasing use of these scores,” Creevy said. “Studies have shown that owners of dogs that are active in sports are more likely to know how to assess BCS, which suggests that owner motivation may play a role in learning how to apply BCS to help their dogs maintain a healthy weight.”

Helping Dogs Reach A Healthy Weight

While many owners are aware that their dogs are overweight and are interested in helping their pet achieve a healthy weight, the process isn’t straightforward.

“Previous research has shown that weight loss interventions for dogs are not always successful, especially if they’re not followed consistently,” Creevy said. “Sometimes there are issues in communication between the veterinarian and the owner, and given what we learned from this study, it’s also possible that some breeds require even stricter feeding practices. ”

If you suspect that your dog is overweight, the best thing to do is talk to your veterinarian, who can recommend the best kind of food for your dog and help you set exercise goals and a feeding schedule that meets your dog’s needs.

By Courtney Price, Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences

Gorillas’ personal circumstances shape their aggression towards groupmates



Animals can adapt the direction of aggression to more or less powerful rivals to suit their individual needs and social contexts



Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology

Female mountain gorillas 

image: 

Three female mountain gorillas in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda.

view more 

Credit: © Martha Robbins





To the point

  • Energetic needs and social context shape aggression in female gorillas: A 25-year observational study of female gorillas shows that individual circumstances and social context can influence an individual's decision to engage in riskier aggressive behaviours.
  • Aggression and social hierarchy: While most aggression was directed from higher- to lower-ranking gorillas, 42 per cent of aggressive interactions were directed from lower to higher ranks – more than expected.
  • Taking risks: Female gorillas in reproductive states with greater energetic needs were found to be more aggressive towards powerful group members. The composition of the group — specifically, the number of males and females present — also influenced target selection.

Animals that live in groups often compete for access to resources, such as food and mates, forming hierarchies that determine priority of access. To maximise their gain of resources while minimising costs, such as energy expenditure and risk, individuals in social groups must choose strategically who to compete with at different times.

“Aggression, a proxy for competition, tends to increase when needs are high and/or resources are limited. While it is typically directed towards lower-ranking individuals, it can also be directed towards higher-ranking ones – and variation is observed even within species,” says Nikos Smit, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig and the University of Turku in Finland. “In this study, we tested the hypothesis that this variation arises due to the different conditions individual animals experience. We found that both an individual’s needs and its social environment shape its aggression towards individuals of different ranks, as predicted by risk-taking theory.”

Data from 25 years of behavioural observations

To test this hypothesis, the authors used 25 years of behavioural observations of a total of 31 adult female gorillas from five wild gorilla groups – one group of western gorillas in Gabon in Central Africa and four groups of mountain gorillas in Uganda in East Africa. Trained observers recorded behaviours used to infer female gorilla hierarchies, such as decided avoidance (walking away from an approaching individual), and assigned each female gorilla a rank in the hierarchy. The observers also recorded aggressive interactions among adult females and assigned a score to each of these interactions to quantify the direction of aggression and whether it was towards individuals who were ranked more powerful or less powerful, according to the aggressor-recipient rank relationship.

After analysing 6,871 aggressive interactions, the researchers found that most of the aggression was directed from higher-ranking individuals to lower-ranking ones. This is consistent with the hypothesis that high-ranking individuals commonly use aggression to reinforce their status. The percentage of aggressive interactions from lower- to higher-ranking individuals was lower at 42 percent, but still higher than in many other animals.

Female gorillas take risks in pursuit of energy and safety

Compared to other females, pregnant and lactating females showed aggression towards more powerful group members, reflecting their increased energy requirements. Despite the fact that lactating females may have even higher energetic needs than pregnant ones, they generally targeted less powerful group members than those pregnant females targeted. The authors suggest that this is because lactating females need to take risks to fulfill their increased needs, but they might limit these risks to protect their dependent infants.

Furthermore, female gorillas directed more aggression to more powerful, higher-ranking females when there were more males in the group, suggesting that male protection creates an environment in which females take greater risks. Conversely, female gorillas directed more aggression to lower-ranking, less powerful females when there were more females in the group, suggesting that they prefer to target weaker opponents when given the option. Together, these results confirm that gorillas can adapt their aggression to their social context.

“Overall, our results confirm that an individual’s circumstantial needs and their social environment may influence their decision to engage in riskier behaviours, such as aggression towards more powerful group members,” concludes Martha Robbins, the study‘s senior author and Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

 

Media–public disconnect on wild meat narratives in central Africa during COVID-19





University of Oxford





A new study published by researchers from the University of Oxford, the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), CIFOR-ICRAF, and institutional partners reveals a disconnect between media and public perceptions on the risks of consuming wild meat in Central Africa during COVID-19 and sheds light on the complex relationship between media reporting, community beliefs, and behaviour change — offering important lessons for wildlife management and public health strategies.

Key findings: 

  1. COVID-19 increased media coverage of wild meat, and the discourse focused on disease risk. 
  2. The news sometimes influenced people in Central Africa to shift their perceptions and stated consumption patterns, but there were several important disconnects:
    1. Respondents generally trusted information sources other than journalists (e.g. personal experience and wild meat sellers), and the media did not always present evidence in their coverage.
    2. Support for wild meat bans in response to COVID-19 was mixed. Less than half of respondents in Cameroon (43%) and DRC (49%) supported a ban, though in DRC it far exceeded opposition (19%).
    3. In addition to disease risk, the price and availability of wild or domestic meat were key factors influencing decisions.
  3. If policymakers want to reduce demand for wild meat, they will need to employ trustworthy communication strategies and increase the availability of safe meat alternatives.

Perceptions of wild meat in the media

“Media articles tended to emphasise the risks of a virus spill-over from wild meat to humans,” said lead author Yuhan Li, DPhil Student at the University of Oxford’s Department of Biology. “However, our results show that people’s perceptions were more influenced by their personal experience, and that their food choices were largely determined by the price and availability of wild and domestic meats.”

Wild meat is a significant source of food and income generation in Central Africa. However, little is known of how the assumed link between COVID-19 and wild meat consumption has been discussed by the media and received by the public.

COVID-19 brought increased media attention to wild meat consumption and changed public perceptions and stated consumption behaviours related to meat consumption in Central Africa. Researchers analysed over 260 media articles from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Gabon, and the Republic of Congo alongside phone surveys of 3,600+ people in Cameroon and DRC.

The study found that although media coverage often emphasised disease risks associated with wild meat (61% of articles that discussed zoonotic risks), public beliefs were more nuanced. In fact, a significant share of respondents viewed domesticated red meat — not wild meat — as the riskiest protein source for disease. Additionally, while nearly half of Cameroonian respondents reported eating less wild meat due to health concerns, one-third of DRC respondents said they increased consumption due to the scarcity and cost of alternatives.

Changing consumption through communication

Research on social perceptions around wild meat is critical for informing interventions that are both culturally appropriate and effective. Bans on trading wild meat were widely discussed in the media as a potential policy response to COVID-19, but there was a lack of consensus among respondents that this would be the most appropriate policy: views were divided in Cameroon, while support was stronger in DRC and opposition lower.

“If we want to shift behaviours around wild meat consumption in Central Africa, we need to start by listening. Top-down bans or generic health warnings rarely work. What makes the difference are approaches grounded in real community needs and motivations, positive campaigns built on evidence, amplified by trusted local voices, and supported by viable alternatives. And that means alternatives not just for consumers, but also for others along the value chain, like vendors. Without options on the supply side, even the most promising interventions risk being undermined,” explains Lude Kinzonzi (Wildlife Conservation Society), one of the co-authors. The authors call for evidence-based communication campaigns, collaboration with trusted local influencers, and targeted, context-specific policy measures.

These should be complemented by expanding access to safe and affordable wild meat substitutes, and by investing in stronger local institutions, law enforcement, and monitoring systems. A multifaceted approach can help achieve both biodiversity conservation and human health outcomes, particularly in regions where wild meat remains a critical component of food security and livelihoods.

Notes to editors

The paper ‘The impact of COVID-19 on public perceptions of wild meat in Central Africa’ will be published in People and Nature. It will be available online when the embargo lifts at: https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pan3.70094

Interviews with the corresponding author are available on request: yuhan.li@spc.ox.ac.uk

Additional details

We extend our thanks to all partners and collaborators at the Ecole Régionale Postuniversitaire d’Aménagement et de Gestion intégrés des Forêts et Territoires tropicaux (ERAIFT) in DRC, the Institut de Recherches en Écologie Tropicale (IRET) in Gabon, and the University of Stirling for their invaluable support in carrying out this research.

This study was funded by the UK Research and Innovation’s Global Challenges Research Fund (UKRI GCRF) through the Trade, Development and the Environment Hub (project number ES/S008160/1), and the Darwin Initiative (project number DAR25015) through the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

About the University of Oxford

Oxford University has been placed number 1 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings for the ninth year running, and ​number 3 in the QS World Rankings 2024. At the heart of this success are the twin-pillars of our ground-breaking research and innovation and our distinctive educational offer.

Oxford is world-famous for research and teaching excellence and home to some of the most talented people from across the globe. Our work helps the lives of millions, solving real-world problems through a huge network of partnerships and collaborations. The breadth and interdisciplinary nature of our research alongside our personalised approach to teaching sparks imaginative and inventive insights and solutions.

Through its research commercialisation arm, Oxford University Innovation, Oxford is the highest university patent filer in the UK and is ranked first in the UK for university spinouts, having created more than 300 new companies since 1988. Over a third of these companies have been created in the past five years. The university is a catalyst for prosperity in Oxfordshire and the United Kingdom, contributing £15.7 billion to the UK economy in 2018/19, and supports more than 28,000 full time jobs.

The Department of Biology is a University of Oxford department within the Maths, Physical, and Life Sciences Division. It utilises academic strength in a broad range of bioscience disciplines to tackle global challenges such as food security, biodiversity loss, climate change and global pandemics. It also helps to train and equip the biologists of the future through holistic undergraduate and graduate courses. For more information visit www.biology.ox.ac.uk.

About the Wildlife Conservation Society

WCS combines the power of its zoos and an aquarium in New York City and a Global Conservation Program in more than 50 countries to achieve its mission to save wildlife and wild places. WCS runs the world’s largest conservation field program, protecting more than 50 percent of Earth’s known biodiversity; in partnership with governments, Indigenous People, Local Communities, and the private sector. Its four zoos and aquarium (the Bronx Zoo, Central Park Zoo, Queens Zoo, Prospect Park Zoo, and the New York Aquarium ) welcome more than 3.5 million visitors each year, inspiring generations to care for nature. Visit: newsroom.wcs.org. Follow: @WCSNewsroom. For more information: +1 (347) 840-1242. Listen to the WCS Wild Audio podcast HERE.

 

First graders who use more educational media spend more time reading


Overall, about 12% of kids’ home screen use has a learning goal




Ohio State University





COLUMBUS, Ohio – An estimated 12% of first graders’ most-used media at home is educational, a new study suggests.

Results also showed that higher use of educational media was associated with both more time spent reading and less overall time in front of a screen – a signal that educational video, app and game use is not replacing reading.

A clearer picture of first graders’ TV or tablet time and factors related to their use of educational media may reveal opportunities for fitting more screen-based learning into their day, researchers say.

“We think it’s really important to understand because there is a lot of evidence that children can learn from high-quality educational media, and that using educational media can be more supportive of development and learning than using high levels of entertainment content,” said lead author Rebecca Dore, director of research at The Ohio State University’s Crane Center for Early Childhood Research and Policy.

“Kids are using, on average, 2 1/2 hours of media a day. And if we are seeing difficulties or disparities in some of these skills and knowledge that children are developing at this age, can we use educational media as a sort of prompt, or support, for those areas?”

The study was published recently in the Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.

Data for this paper came from reports by parents and caregivers participating in a larger study following children from preschool or kindergarten to fourth grade in central Ohio.

The 346 caregivers completed a questionnaire in the spring of a child’s first grade school year, reporting on up to three to five TV shows, videos, apps or games the child used the most. The research team then used a systematic coding system to categorize the content as educational or entertainment.

Researchers characterized the overall amount of educational content as a “small but potentially meaningful portion of children’s media use in this age range.” Dore noted that the range of educational themes varied quite a bit: “Some kids were getting 0% from their most-used content and for some kids, 100% of their most-used content was educational.”

Overall, more apps and games were used for educational purposes than video and TV, and STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) topics dominated the content coded as educational.

Socioeconomic status did not affect educational media use, “suggesting that there is somewhat equitable access across socioeconomic status, which I think is really important,” Dore said.

Although the published study did not examine media outlets, Dore said that follow-up analysis showed that PBS was the provider of 45.2% of the educational TV and video content commonly used by first graders.

“The objective of those programs is being able to provide free, high-quality public media access to families,” she said. “When educational content is integrated into the plot of a program, children are having to learn the educational content to be able to follow the storyline. That’s the kind of content that PBS tends to produce, which is better than more didactic programming, like: ‘OK, kids, now we’re going to do this lesson.’”

Results showed that girls used more educational media than boys, perhaps a reflection of other research suggesting that girls lean toward relationship-focused content that might be more common in educational media, and boys tend to favor more action-oriented content.

Finding that educational media use does not crowd out reading time or extend overall screen time could help ease the minds of parents who might worry about a recommendation that their children tune into more digital educational content.

There’s no established ideal amount of educational media use among first graders, Dore said – the sweet spot depends on the child, the home environment, and lots of other factors.

“We need to know what’s out there and what children are actually using of what’s available to understand how to better diversify the content for children and make sure it’s being used by the children who need it most,” she said. “We’re all worried about what enriching activities that children might not be engaging in because they’re spending so much time using screens. So let’s increase the quality of the screen time they’re getting.”

This work was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences.

Co-authors were Kelly Purtell, Tzu-Jung Lin and Laura Justice, all of Ohio State

#

Contact: Rebecca Dore, Dore.13@osu.edu

Written by Emily Caldwell, Caldwell.151@osu.edu; 614-292-8152

Why we are taken in by the accusation of election fraud



Psychology




Ruhr-University Bochum

Team of authors 

image: 

Hans Alves, André Vaz and Moritz Ingendahl (from left) have conducted seven consecutive online studies.

 

view more 

Credit: © RUB, Marquard




The effect played into Trump’s hands

During the presidential election in 2020, Donald Trump was initially ahead of his competitor Joe Biden in many states, even after most votes had already been counted. However, towards the end, the margins became closer, and eventually Joe Biden took the lead. “STOP THE COUNT”, Donald Trump demanded on Twitter/X once he began to fall behind his opponent. Many of his supporters backed his accusation that the election had been rigged, resulting in the storm on the Capitol in January of 2021. A few years later, one third of all Americans still believe that the election had been fixed.

Trump’s fraud allegations were likely fueled by the cumulative redundancy bias, as shown by the team in Bochum working with Dr. André Vaz, Dr. Moritz Ingendahl, and Dr. Hans Alves in seven studies. During the summer of 2024, the researchers conducted online studies with about 200 participants each from the United Kingdom and the United States. They used a mixture of fictional and real interim and final results of vote counts for these studies.

Interim results in reverse order

The research team showed the participants the interim and end results of a vote count in which one candidate first had a clear early lead over the other, but later lost the lead and the election. “The subjects had a more positive view of the initial favorite, even if they eventually lost the election,” reports Ingendahl. “The winner was viewed more poorly if they took the lead late in the count.” When the researchers presented the same count results but in reverse chronological order, the participants’ views flipped.

In one follow-up study, the researchers took the same approach but let the participants know after the count was final that there were rumors of possible election fraud. “As expected, the participants found it more likely that fraud had been committed during the vote if the winner took the lead late in the count,” says Ingendahl.

If the researchers confronted the subjects with the rumor of fraud during the count, the participants thought it was likely that the fraud had been committed to the benefit of the now leading candidate. “This perception was not affected by the candidate one supports,” Ingendahl emphasizes. In one study, the researchers presented American participants with the real vote results from the state of Georgia in chronologically correct or in reverse order. In 2020, Joe Biden took the lead here very late and won the state after trailing behind Donald Trump for much of the count. “In our study, Democrats and Republicans were equally likely to be influenced by the interim vote count results, and whether they made either Donald Trump or Joe Biden have an early lead in the vote counts,” says Ingendahl.

Improving trust

Reporting on electoral results is thus proven to impact trust in the election itself. “False beliefs concerning illegitimate elections could be combated by only announcing the results after all votes have been counted,” the researchers summarize. They also recommend more transparency for the public regarding the factors that lead to certain developments in the vote count. Better prediction algorithms could also prevent the announcement of interim results that do not align with the final result.