Wednesday, July 30, 2025

 

Journal of Environmental Sciences study analyzes impact of ozone pollution on crop yields in China and effects from COVID-19



Statistical analysis of data reveals that rising ozone pollution has drastically affected crop yields in China, advocating the urgent need for emission control



Editorial Office of Journal of Environmental Sciences

High-resolution spatiotemporal data analysis reveals the extent of crop yield losses in China 

image: 

Rice, wheat, and maize are the most important staple crops in the world and account for 60% of the world’s food energy. Researchers have, however, found that rising ozone (O3) pollution levels led to reduction in their national yields in China. These findings, coming in the wake of increasing population levels, call for urgent measures to curb O3pollution and safeguard food security.

view more 

Credit: Around Nha Trang, rice fields by Arian Zwegers on Flickr Image Source Link: https://openverse.org/image/d09f29b0-5022-49e8-91e6-3a97a568acab





Ozone, or trioxygen, is a light blue gas with the molecular formula O3. It is widely known in the form of the ozone layer: a part of the Earth's stratosphere that protects us from the Sun's harmful ultraviolet radiation. Since its discovery over a hundred years ago, scientists have studied the ozone layer extensively. While ozone layer is abundant in the stratosphere, it is also present in trace amounts in the troposphere—the bottommost layer of the Earth’s atmosphere. In troposphere, ozone layer is known as ground-level, surface-level, or tropospheric ozone layer and acts as a secondary pollutant. It is mainly generated via photochemical reactions among nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds from natural sources, as well as anthropogenic sources, including biomass burning and fossil fuels.

Tropospheric ozone, a greenhouse gas, contributes to the formation of harmful photochemical smog, which can lead to severe health issues in humans and animals, cause environmental damage, and negatively impact microorganisms. Alarmingly, the emissions of nitrogen oxides and other related substances have increased over the last century, which has, in turn, elevated the tropospheric ozone levels in the present era. This trend is particularly evident in the extratropical regions of the Northern Hemisphere. In China, the alarming and continuous increase in surface ozone pollution, in conjunction with the impacts of climate change and global warming, poses a serious threat to food security. Recent studies have reported a wide range of yield losses of major staple crops such as rice, wheat, and maize in China, ranging from 4.5% to 33%. In this scenario, there is an urgent need for more extensive and comprehensive research to narrow down this uncertainty arising from the spatiotemporal accuracy of O3 metrics as well as the extrapolation methods used to estimate the effect on crop yield.

Advancing research, an international team of researchers from China and the USA, led by Guangsheng Chen, from the College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, and Hanqin Tian, from the Center for Earth Science and Global Sustainability, Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, Boston College, and the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Boston College, has provided a more robust analysis on the impact of O3 pollution in China. Their findings were made available online on February 25, 2025 and will be published in Volume 157 of the Journal of Environmental Sciences, an Elsevier journal, on November 1, 2025.

Talking about the methodology employed in this study, Dr. Chen says, “We analyzed the spatiotemporal patterns of O3 pollution and its impacts on yield, production, and economic losses for wheat, rice, and maize in China during 2005–2020 based on a high spatial resolution of 0.1° hourly surface O3 data.”

The researchers found that the accumulated O3 exposure over a threshold of 40 parts per billion, a metric popularly known as AOT40, recorded a 10% uptick during the period 2005–2019. In contrast, a notable decrease of 5.56% was observed in 2020 due to the COVID-19 lockdowns, highlighting the broad impact of the pandemic on the environment as well. Overall, the rising O3 pollution was found to result in national-level wheat, rice, and maize yield losses of 14.51% ± 0.43%, 11.10% ± 0.6%, and 3.99% ± 0.11%, respectively, in China.

Furthermore, the study utilizes a business-as-usual projection to highlight that the relative yield loss (RYL) is expected to reach 8%–18% at the national scale by 2050 in the absence of a proper emission control policy.

“COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020 led to significantly reduced RYL for maize (0.52%) and rice (2.17%), but not for wheat (0.11%), with the largest reduction (1.88%–9.4%) in the North China Plain, highlighting the potential benefits of emission control,” points out Dr. Tian.

In summary, these findings suggest that rising ozone pollution has drastically affected crop yields in China, leading to production and economic losses. It presents a strong case for the urgent need to mitigate O3 pollution to ensure food security, especially in densely populated areas.

 

***

 

Reference

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.02.034

 

About Zhejiang A&F University
Zhejiang A&F University (ZAFU) was founded in 1958 in China, and is a comprehensive university specializing in agriculture, forestry, and ecological sciences. ZAFU is supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Government and the State Forestry and Grassland Administration and offers undergraduate to doctoral programs across diverse fields including life sciences, environmental engineering, and information technology. With its scenic, forested campus and strong academic environment, ZAFU provides excellent opportunities for education and scientific advancement. The university emphasizes sustainability, rural development, and innovation, fostering international cooperation and interdisciplinary research.

To know more about ZAFU, visit: https://en.zafu.edu.cn/

 

About Boston College
Boston College was founded as a private Jesuit College in 1863. It offers a rigorous academic experience through its eight colleges and schools, testifying its commitment to the highest standards of teaching, research, and service. Consistently ranked among the nation’s top institutions, Boston College serves close to 15,000 undergraduate and graduate students. Rooted with a strong liberal arts foundation, a dedication to social justice, and a vibrant campus life, Boston College prepares students to lead with integrity and purpose.

To learn more, visit: https://www.bc.edu/

 

About Guangsheng Chen from Zhejiang A&F University
Guangsheng Chen is a Professor (Full) at the College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, China. His research focuses on environmental management and impact assessment, ecology and evolution, and spatial statistics and analysis. He has published more than 50 research papers and has been cited approximately 5,000 times.

 

About Hanqin Tian from Boston College
Dr. Hanqin Tian is the Schiller Institute Professor and Director of the Center for Earth System Science and Global Sustainability at Boston College, USA. His research interests include terrestrial ecosystems and global biogeochemical cycles. He has authored over 400 peer-reviewed journal articles and has received approximately 60,000 citations.

 

Funding information
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0606001), the Ozone Formation Mechanism and Control Strategies Project of Research Center of Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. RCEES-CYZX-2020), and the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42171463). H.T. and S.P. were supported by the US National Science Foundation (No. 1903722) and Andrew Carnegie Fellowship (No. G-F-19–56910).

 

Chungnam National University researchers reveal how vitamin D is shown to reduce liver damage by boosting TXNIP activity in cholangiocytes



A new study uncovers how vitamin D activates the TXNIP gene in ductular cells to reduce inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver disease




Chungnam National University Evaluation Team

Vitamin D as Supportive Therapy in Liver Disease Patients 

image: 

Vitamin D upregulates gene TXNIP, a key regulator of oxidative stress and inflammation in ductular cells, which in turn inhibits ductular reaction, inflammation, and fibrosis in liver disease

view more 

Credit: Chungnam National University





Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major global health concern, affecting approximately 1.5 billion people. This life-threatening disease often progresses silently, eventually leading to worsened conditions like liver cirrhosis or liver cancer. There is currently no treatment for CLD other than liver transplantation.

Vitamin D is commonly consumed for enhanced bone health. This study opens exciting possibilities for repurposing an inexpensive supplement as a complementary therapy for liver diseases. Prof. Hyo-Jung Kwon from the College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University in Daejeon, Republic of Korea, and his colleagues have studied the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications of Vitamin D in liver disease. “Here, we explored the effects of vitamin D on ductular reaction and CLDs, and investigated underlying mechanisms. Our data reveal that vitamin D supplementation ameliorates ductular reaction and reduces liver inflammation and fibrosis largely through TXNIP,” comments Prof. Kwon. Their study was published online on 13 May 2025, in Nature Communications.

Ductular reaction refers to the proliferation of ductular cells (primarily cholangiocytes) in response to liver injury. While initially protective, excessive or prolonged ductular reaction contributes to inflammation and fibrosis. In this study, researchers observed that lower plasma levels of vitamin D were associated with more severe ductular reaction in patients with CLD.

Vitamin D upregulates the expression of TXNIP (Thioredoxin-interacting protein). This was confirmed in a mouse study where Txnip deletion in cholangiocytes promoted ductular reaction and even exacerbated liver inflammation and fibrosis. In vitro analysis revealed the Vitamin D/TXNIP molecular axis. “Furthermore, Txnip deficiency increases TNF-α and TGF-β secretion by cholangiocytes to stimulate Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells, consequently leading to inflammation and collagen deposition,” adds Prof. Kwon.

Research that supports early diagnosis and better treatment for CLD is not only warranted but essential. “Our preclinical data reveal a new mechanism by which vitamin D supplementation ameliorates CLDs and support the idea that the vitamin D/TXNIP axis could be a promising therapeutic target in clinically addressing the ductular reaction and CLDs,” comments Prof. Kwon.  Further research is needed to validate the clinical application of vitamin D supplementation as a standard supportive therapy for patients with chronic liver disease.

Ultimately, this work could improve outcomes for millions worldwide by offering safer and more personalized liver disease therapies.

 

***

 

Reference
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59724-z

 

 

About the institute
Chungnam National University (CNU), located in Daejeon, South Korea, is a leading national university renowned for its excellence in research and education. Established in 1952, CNU offers diverse programs in engineering, medicine, sciences, and the arts, fostering innovation and global collaboration. Situated near Daedeok Innopolis, a major R&D hub, it excels in biotechnology, materials science, and information technology. With a vibrant international community and cutting-edge facilities, CNU continues to drive academic and technological advancements, making it a top choice for students worldwide.

Website: https://plus.cnu.ac.kr/html/en/

 

About the author
Prof. Hyo-Jung Kwon is a Professor of College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University. She is studying the underlying mechanisms of liver and metabolic diseases, including hepatic steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis/cirrhosis, tumors, obesity, and diabetes. She is also trying to develop specific murine models of liver diseases to mimic human patients. Her ultimate goal is to pioneer in 'bench to bedside' translational research and improve the quality of life for patients.

 

The key to success: Why university startups don’t perform as well as corporate startups



The review article explores the differences between university startup entrepreneurs and corporate entrepreneurs, and why the latter are more successful



Waseda University

Researcher investigates the characteristic differences between entrepreneurs from universities versus corporates 

image: 

University Startup Entrepreneurs (USEs) have immense scientific knowledge and receive substantial university support and resources to launch their high-tech startups. However, they are often not as successful as Corporate Startup Entrepreneurs (CSEs). Prof. Alex Coad studied the differences between USEs and CSEs and found that fundamental differences in entrepreneurial motivations, culture, knowledge, and identity could be the reason why CSEs have an edge over USEs.

view more 

Credit: Alex Coad from Waseda Business School, Waseda University





University research is where innovative technological breakthroughs originate. As a result, a number of proactive universities provide substantial resources and support to their academic researchers to help increase the number of all ventures. However, despite receiving this extensive support and having access to the best scientific knowledge, many academic entrepreneurs are not as successful as their corporate counterparts. While this sounds like a contradiction, there is enough empirical evidence explaining just why this could be happening.

With this in mind, Professor Alex Coad from the Waseda Business School, Waseda University, Japan, critically analyzes the differences between Corporate Startup Entrepreneurs (CSEs) and University Startup Entrepreneurs (USEs) to answer the question as to why CSEs outperform USEs. “My analysis is part literature review, and part ‘appreciative theorizing,’ which comes from applying rigorous theoretical frameworks from previous literature,” explains Coad. Accordingly, his comparison of the two entrepreneurship types relies on different theories and perspectives about motivations, knowledge base and search routines, culture, and personal identity, among others. The results of this extensive study were published online in The Journal of Technology Transfer on June 17, 2025.

According to the study, USEs refer to faculty, staff, or students from universities and public research institutes who innovate in an academic research context and subsequently found a firm based on that research. Similarly, CSEs refer to those who launch their businesses after leaving their previous employment in a private firm and utilize the knowledge gained from it.

One of the main characteristic differences between USEs and CSEs is their entrepreneurial motivation that influences their paths and outcomes. While USEs are driven by monetary rewards, their main motivation often comes from undertaking intellectually stimulating research that might lead to more academic achievements. University jobs often have plenty of autonomy, hence USEs often steer towards being opportunity entrepreneurs because they will not leave academia to start a firm for want of autonomy. On the other hand, CSEs may be driven by the desire to escape employment frustrations in the pursuit of workplace autonomy. This can lead to a focus on lifestyle motivations (autonomy, flexible working style, etc.) for entrepreneurship.

Cultural orientation is another factor that shapes entrepreneurial behavior. USEs tend to be more communitarian or missionary, wherein they focus more on creating societal impact and being valued in the community, rather than their financial performance. Whereas, CSEs often adopt a Darwinian approach, with an emphasis on commercial success and gaining a competitive edge.

Furthermore, while USEs possess valuable scientific knowledge, they often lack commercial acumen. They mostly rely on codified knowledge found in published resources, and their specialized knowledge is not applicable across different industries. In contrast, CSEs possess tacit business knowledge learned through their experiences, with specialized understanding of market opportunities and industry networks that are transferable across sectors.

Another driving factor is USEs’ notion of identity. The transition from an academic identity to a profit-seeking, entrepreneurial identity is complicated and challenging for USEs, often becoming psychologically inhibiting and resulting in lower success rates. Finally, USEs tend to prefer technical roles, while shirking from managerial and regulatory tasks, and connecting with customers, which can create an organizational power imbalance. Even their problem-solving approach is more analytical as opposed to the practical approach taken by CSEs.

Although these inherent traits place USEs at a disadvantage against CSEs, for example, regarding knowledge of customer needs, Coad believes that they can be overcome with the right guidance and policy mechanisms. “Mentoring and peer networks can help USEs smoothly transition and adapt to their entrepreneurial role. Support institutions, like incubators and accelerators, can encourage them to adopt lean startup principles to test the market. After all, understanding user needs is not ‘rocket science,’ but early-stage activities that are within the grasp of USEs, if only they are willing,” Coad concludes.

 

***


Reference
Author: 
Alex Coad
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-025-10228-4
Affiliation: Waseda Business School, Waseda University           

 

About Waseda University
Located in the heart of Tokyo, Waseda University is a leading private research university that has long been dedicated to academic excellence, innovative research, and civic engagement at both the local and global levels since 1882. The University has produced many changemakers in its history, including eight prime ministers and many leaders in business, science and technology, literature, sports, and film. Waseda has strong collaborations with overseas research institutions and is committed to advancing cutting-edge research and developing leaders who can contribute to the resolution of complex, global social issues. The University has set a target of achieving a zero-carbon campus by 2032, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations in 2015. 

To learn more about Waseda University, visit https://www.waseda.jp/top/en  

 

About Professor Alex Coad  
Dr. Alex Coad is a Professor at Waseda Business School, Waseda University, Japan. He is interested in the areas of firm growth, firm performance, entrepreneurship, and innovation policy. He has published about 100 articles in international peer-reviewed journals, over 14 thousand citations and an H-index of over 50. He is an Editor at Research Policy and Small Business Economics and an Associate Editor at Industrial and Corporate Change. Prof. Coad has previously held academic positions at the Max Planck Institute, Aalborg University, University of Sussex, and CENTRUM Graduate Business School, and was an Economic Analyst at the European Commission. He received the 2016 Nelson Prize at the University of California, Berkeley. 

 

Rethinking urban carbon: from power plants to people





Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences

Visualizing Shenzhen's Urban Carbon Shifts: From Production to Consumption. 

image: 

Visualizing Shenzhen's Urban Carbon Shifts: From Production to Consumption.

view more 

Credit: Environmental Science and Ecotechnology





As cities become the frontline in climate action, understanding their internal carbon dynamics is crucial. A new study presents a high-resolution emissions mapping framework for megacities, revealing how carbon responsibility has shifted from centralized producers—like power plants and factories—to distributed end-users, such as homes and businesses. Using Shenzhen as a model, researchers integrated Scope 1 (direct) and Scope 2 (indirect) emissions across sectors and space, capturing emissions at the street, building, and 1 × 1 km2 district levels. This detailed approach not only uncovers the hidden carbon flows within urban systems but also highlights key areas for policy intervention, enabling cities to design fair and effective carbon mitigation strategies.

Urban areas are home to over half the world's population and emit more than 70% of fossil-fuel-derived carbon dioxide (CO2). Among these, megacities face mounting pressure to balance rapid development with climate goals. However, existing emissions tracking methods often rely on coarse annual citywide totals, obscuring the spatial and sectoral diversity of emissions. Most notably, traditional inventories focus on Scope 1 emissions—direct outputs from within city limits—while neglecting Scope 2 (indirect) emissions from imported electricity, which can be substantial. This limited view hinders effective policymaking. Based on these challenges, there is a pressing need to conduct fine-scale, integrated analyses of urban carbon flows to guide equitable and precise climate actions.

Researchers from the Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School have published a study (DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2025.100602) on July 12, 2025, in Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, unveiling a novel carbon accounting model for megacities. Focusing on Shenzhen, China, the study combines building simulations, traffic data, industrial data, and land use to map both Scope 1 (direct) and Scope 2 (indirect) emissions down to individual structures. The findings reveal a major shift in carbon responsibility from producers to consumers and offer a scalable framework to support low-carbon urban transformations worldwide.

The team developed a high-resolution framework that quantifies and spatially allocates CO₂ emissions by integrating fuel-specific industrial data, building-level electricity usage, and real-time traffic flows. In 2020, Shenzhen's total CO₂ emissions reached 52.0 Tg, with 44.8 Tg (86.3%) from Scope 1 and 7.2 Tg (13.7%) from Scope 2 sources. While power plants and road traffic dominated direct emissions, indirect emissions from electricity use in residential, commercial, and industrial buildings accounted for over 60% of total Scope 2 emissions. Notably, when emissions were reallocated to consumption points, emission hotspots expanded from 0.7% to 12.7% of city area, revealing broader responsibility beyond traditional industrial centers. The study also found that 84.8% of Shenzhen's districts are consumption-led, emphasizing the need for energy efficiency and green buildings. By uncovering disparities in emissions across districts and population densities, the study offers actionable insights for targeting reductions where they are most impactful. This bottom-up approach bridges the gap between macro targets and micro interventions, enabling cities to tailor mitigation strategies with unprecedented precision.

“Our research demonstrates that cities must move beyond total emissions and consider where, how, and by whom emissions are generated and used,” said Prof. Bo Zheng, co-author of the study. “By revealing the hidden carbon flows linked to electricity consumption, especially in high-density districts, our landscape-level framework empowers urban planners and policymakers to design interventions that are both effective and equitable. As more cities adopt similar tools, we can accelerate the path toward climate neutrality.”

This study sets the stage for smarter carbon tracking in megacities worldwide. The landscape-level framework can inform targeted policies, such as installing solar panels on high-consuming buildings, promoting energy-efficient designs, and transitioning to cleaner power sources in production-led zones. Moreover, it supports climate justice by clarifying who bears carbon responsibility in complex urban ecosystems. With broader adoption, especially in cities heavily reliant on imported electricity, this model can help governments and citizens take coordinated, data-informed steps to meet emission reduction goals—transforming not just how we measure urban carbon, but how we act on it.

###

References

DOI

10.1016/j.ese.2025.100602

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2025.100602

Funding information

This work was supported by the Shenzhen Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission (Grant No. WDZC20220810110301001).

About Environmental Science and Ecotechnology

Environmental Science and Ecotechnology (ISSN 2666-4984) is an international, peer-reviewed, and open-access journal published by Elsevier. The journal publishes significant views and research across the full spectrum of ecology and environmental sciences, such as climate change, sustainability, biodiversity conservation, environment & health, green catalysis/processing for pollution control, and AI-driven environmental engineering. The latest impact factor of ESE is 14, according to the Journal Citation ReportTM 2024.