Saturday, August 16, 2025

Chinese tariff on canola seed comes into force as producers, premiers demand action

By The Canadian Press
August 14, 2025 

David Reid lands his 1957 Helio Courier on a landing strip bordered by his canola crop on the family's farm near Cremona, Alta., Thursday, July 17, 2025.
 THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

REGINA — Prime Minister Mark Carney says he’s considering measures to support farmers hit by a steep Chinese tariff on canola seed that came into force Thursday.

Carney said on social media that he spoke with Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, and they agreed to continue talking with agriculture groups about possible options. He provided no details on a plan.

The duty of nearly 76 per cent, announced Tuesday, has already caused the price of one of Canada’s most valuable crops to fall, wiping out millions of dollars in its value.

“If maintained, these unjustified duties will have significant impacts on many Canadian farmers,” Carney said.

“Premier Moe and I focused on a series of measures to support hard-working farmers who provide world-class food to Canadians and our trading partners throughout the world.”


The tariff comes one year after China launched an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola. It was in response to Canada’s 100 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles.

The two countries have since slapped each other with various levies.

Last year, Ottawa imposed its tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles and 25 per cent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum. Beijing retaliated with 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola meal and oil.

China’s latest move on canola seed means all canola products face levies.

Earlier Thursday, federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre repeated his call for Carney to cancel a $1-billion federal loan given to BC Ferries, which is purchasing Chinese-made ships.

“That is crazy at a time when they’re targeting our farmers,” he said.

Poilievre also accused Carney of not caring about western Canadian producers and of showing weak leadership when it comes to signing new trade deals.

“(Carney) is all talk and no action. Things are not different; they are getting worse.”

Carney failed to meet a self-imposed deadline to get a new trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump but has said officials from both countries are still working together.

The international trade ministry said in a statement the government “will always protect our Canadian farmers and producers, their families and the jobs they support.”

The ministry also said Canada recently concluded a trade agreement with Ecuador and is close to finishing negotiations with the United Arab Emirates.


Agriculture Minister Heath MacDonald and International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu have said they remain ready to speak constructively with Chinese officials to address trade concerns.

Carney also said Thursday that Canada will advance conversations with China, while aiming to expand exports to other countries.

“Canada does not dump canola. Canadian canola products meet the highest standards, and our inspection systems are robust,” he said.

Farmers have also rejected claims of dumping, arguing exporters have followed rules-based trade. They’ve called on Ottawa to resolve the issue by speaking constructively with Chinese officials.

In a letter to Carney, Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck urges the prime minister to organize a trade mission to China with premiers.

“New tariffs on canola seed are a serious threat to Saskatchewan and require urgent action and attention by your government,” Beck writes.

Beck also asks Carney to consider removing the tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles as a conciliatory measure to end the canola tariffs.

On Wednesday, Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew said Ottawa should use the revenues from its tariffs on Chinese EVs to support canola producers.

He also suggested Canada has collected $100 million in such tariffs, while China’s move has wiped out $1 billion in canola values.

Moe and the Canadian Canola Growers Association have both said the industry contributes more than $43 billion to the country’s economy and employs roughly 200,000 people.

The association says China is the largest export market for Canadian canola seed, taking up about 67 per cent of Canada’s shipments, worth billions of dollars.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 14, 2025.


‘It’s devastating’: Manitoba farmers react to Chinese canola tariffs

By Alex Karpa
 August 14, 2025 


Alex Karpa reports on the impact new tariffs launched by China in response to Canada’s tariff on electric vehicles could have on farmers and consumers.

When David Hamblin heard China is slapping a nearly 76 per cent tariff on imports of Canadian canola, it was a “here we go again” moment for the Manitoba farmer.

“It’s something that we are unfortunately kind of getting used to,” he said. “With these political things that are kind of happening, I don’t think it’s as shocking as these things used to be. It’s unfortunate, but it’s the world we are living in.”

China, which sources nearly all of its supplies of canola from Canada, announced preliminary anti-dumping duties on canola imports on Tuesday, escalating a year-long trade dispute that began with Ottawa’s tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle (EV) imports last August.

The new tariffs, set at 75.8 per cent, will come into effect on Thursday.

“Canada is deeply disappointed with China’s decision to implement provisional anti-dumping duties in its self-initiated investigation into import of canola seed from Canada,” International Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu and Agriculture Minister Heath MacDonald said in a statement Tuesday.


“We do not dump canola. Our hard-working farmers provide world-class food to Canadians and international trading partners. Canadian canola products meet the highest standards, and our inspection systems are robust,” they said.

“Canada is committed to ensuring fair market access for our canola industry and we remain ready to engage in constructive dialogue with Chinese officials to address our respective trade concerns.”

Hamblin says this new escalation in the tariff war between Canada and China is creating uncertainty for canola farmers like himself.

“It’s hit our bottom line significantly, if we were to sell today,” he said. “We don’t know what that number will be down the road. We are hopefully things will prevail.”

MacDonald and Sidhu met with Canadian canola representatives Wednesday to discuss next possible steps.

Canola seed production generated nearly $13 billion in 2024, making it the most valuable field crop in the country.

Farmer Warren Ellis, who is also the chair of Manitoba Canola Growers, said this is a devastating blow to the canola industry.

“Things are still unfolding,” he said. “The challenge now is how do we survive this? How do we improve our cash flows without losing our bottom line? That’s a challenge.”

Ellis says it’s still too early to tell what impact this will ultimately have down the road, but if it continues, it won’t be good.

“Some farmers have a hard time growing other crops,” he said. “Canola makes up a huge part of a lot of farmers income and it’s very important for them.”

Canada is now in trade conflicts with the world’s two largest economies, the United States, and China.


University of Manitoba Agriculture professor Derek Brewin says canola prices are really starting to take a hit.

“On Monday, you could sell your canola for $660 per tonne, and on Tuesday afternoon, it went to $630 per tonne,” he said. “That’s a pretty big drop for a single day on any market move.”

China is the largest export market for Canadian canola seed. According to the Government of Canada, it represents 67 per cent of total canola seed exports, totalling 5.9 million tonnes in 2024, worth approximately $4 billion.

“If they don’t solve the trade dispute, or if they leave this duty in for a long period of time, next spring, farmers won’t seed very much canola,” Brewin said. “If we’re not exporting to China, we’re not exporting quite a bit of our production.”

Hamblin would like to see these trade disputes resolved quickly, as harvest season is right around the corner.

“A month or two down the road, or sooner, hopefully we can see trade progress on all crops and get some of these things ironed out.”

Back in March, China imposed a 100 per cent levy on Canadian canola oil and meal, plus peas, and a 25 per cent tax on Canadian seafood and pork.

How a shift to canola-based biofuel could help make up for lost Chinese market


By Allison Bamford
 August 15, 2025 

As China begins subjecting Canadian canola to new tariffs, industry leaders are calling for Canada to diversify trade of the crop. Allison Bamford reports.

Long before China imposed its anti-dumping duty on Canadian canola seed and 100 per cent tariffs on canola oil and meal, industry leaders had been looking to diversify away from the unpredictable market.

A big opportunity lies in the biofuel market both in Canada and the United States.

“Canadian canola is a terrific feedstock for producing renewable fuels,” said Chris Vervaet, executive director of the Canadian Oilseed Processors Association.

Canada’s clean fuel regulations are driving demand for low carbon renewable fuels, such as biodiesel and renewable diesel, Vervaet said.

Domestic production is growing, but canola isn’t the preferred feedstock.

Used cooking oil and other waste oils – products that are cheaper to source – make up the bulk of the biofuel feedstock.

“Currently, canola has a piece of that pie. It’s not the size of the pie that we want,” Vervaet said.

If canola were to capture half of the biofuel market, in terms of being the preferred feedstock, Vervaet said that would equate to roughly 2.5 million tons of canola, which is nearly half of the seed that is exported to China annually.

“We’d go a long way in addressing the concern that’s in front of us right now,” he said.

Vervaet said the industry would like to see the federal clean fuel regulations implement guardrails to prevent the use of “questionable” feedstock and imported used cooking oil in biofuel production.

“The imported used cooking oil that’s coming into our biofuel market is eating canola’s lunch. It’s taking market share away from us when we need it most,” he said.

Canola prices have dropped since news of the Chinese anti-dumping duty hit. Millions of dollars in canola value have already been wiped out.

Martin Reaney, the Chair in Lipid Quality and Utilization at the University of Saskatchewan, said dropping prices could increase the appetite for canola-based biofuel.

“There’s a greater capacity to handle more of that canola oil should it become available at a more approachable price,” Reaney said.

There’s also potential for canola to tap into the sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) industry, according to North Vector Dynamics Chief Operating Officer Omar Saleh.

Canola can be used to produce SAF, which is chemically identical to conventional jet fuel, Saleh said.

“It would function on existing airport infrastructure in terms of refueling infrastructure. It would function with the same engines that we have today,” he said.

SAF is already being used by the U.S. Air Force. Australia is manufacturing it, and Air Canada purchased this country’s first commercial batch last year.

“We’re already producing it. We’re just doing it on a really small scale, and so is the U.S. and so is the EU,” Saleh said.

Saleh said Canada would need to expand its canola crushing capacity and upgrade some of its facilities to manufacture canola-based SAF, but the infrastructure is already there.


Allison Bamford

Videojournalist, CTV National News

China slaps temporary duties on Canadian canola

By Reuters
 August 12, 2025 

Pumpjacks draw out oil and gas from well heads surrounded by Canola fields near Cremona, Alta., Monday, July 15, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

BEIJING/SINGAPORE — China on Tuesday announced preliminary anti-dumping duties on Canadian canola imports, a fresh escalation in the year-long trade dispute that began with Ottawa’s imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle imports last August.

The provisional rate will be set at 75.8 per cent, effective from Thursday, the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement.

ICE November canola futures RSX5 fell 6.5 per cent to a four-month low after the announcement.

“This really came as a surprise and a shock,” said trader Tony Tryhuk of RBC Dominion Securities.Trade War coverage on BNNBloomberg.ca

China, the world’s largest importer of canola - also known as rapeseed - sources nearly all of its supplies of the product from Canada. The steep duties would likely all but end imports if they are maintained.


“This is huge. Who will pay a 75 per cent deposit to bring Canadian canola to China? It is like telling Canada that we don’t need your canola, thank you very much,” said one Singapore-based oilseed trader.

China’s Ministry of Commerce said on Tuesday that an anti-dumping probe launched in September 2024had found that Canada’s agricultural sector - particularly the canola industry - had benefited from “substantial” government subsidies and preferential policies.

China has until September, when the investigation formally ends, to make a final decision on the duties, though it has the option of extending that deadline by six months. A final ruling could result in a different rate, or overturn Tuesday’s decision.

The decision marks a shift from the conciliatory tone struck in June when China Premier Li Qiang said there were no deep-seated conflicts of interest between the countries during a phone call with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

“This move ... will put additional pressure on Canada’s government to sort through trade frictions with China,” said Trivium China agriculture analyst Even Rogers Pay.

Canada’s trade, agriculture and the prime minister’s office did not immediately respond to request for comment. The Canadian embassy in Beijing did not respond to Reuters’ request for comment.

China had already imposed tariffs on canola oil and meal in March. Canada is now in a trade conflict with the world’s two largest economies, as it also faces tariffs on some goods from the United States.

Separately, China also launched an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian pea starch and imposed provisional duties on imports of halogenated butyl rubber, according to ministry statements.
No easy replacement

Replacing millions of tons of Canadian canola is likely to be difficult at short notice, say analysts.


China primarily uses imported canola to make animal feed for its aquaculture sector. A separate duty on Canadian canola meal imports in March has already put these supplies at risk.

The move provides an opportunity for Australia, which looks set to regain access to the Chinese market with a few test cargoes this year after a years-long freeze in the trade, Pay said.

Australia, the second-largest canola exporter, has been shut out of the Chinese market since 2020 due mainly to Chinese rules to stop the spread of fungal plant disease.

However, even if Australian imports increase, “fully replacing Canadian canola will be very difficult unless import demand drops sharply,” said Donatas Jankauskas, an analyst with commodity data firm CM Navigator.Latest updates on investing here

Commodity funds have a substantial long position in ICE canola futures, traders said, which should add fuel to the selloff fire.

“This will help accelerate their exit of that long and could really extend the losses,” said Tryhuk.

Another trader said there was already downward pressure coming into canola prices as Canada’s crop is widely believed to be bigger than many previously forecast due to good weather.

“We’re just realizing we’ve got a better crop that’s about to come off,” said the trader. “This is a gut punch no one was expecting.”

Ventum Financial broker David Derwin said some traders don’t know how to take the Chinese move yet, since it is not a final rule.

“Is it a negotiating tactic? Or does China put it in and that’s that?” Derwin asked.

---

Reporting by Ella Cao and Lewis Jackson in Beijing and Naveen Thukral in Singapore; Additional reporting by Gus Trompiz in Paris and Ed White in Winnipeg; Editing by Christian Schmollinger, Bernadette Baum, Jan Harvey and Mark Porter

Trade War

Michigan Gov. told Trump in private that auto jobs depend on a tariff change of course

By The Associated Press
 August 09, 2025 

An American Flag at the Ford Motor Company Kentucky Truck Plant is seen during a media tour for the launch of the 2025 Ford Expedition in Louisville, Ky., April 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)

WASHINGTON — Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer met privately in the Oval Office with U.S. President Donald Trump to make a case he did not want to hear: the automotive industry he said he wants to save were being hurt by his tariffs.

The Democrat came with a slide deck to make her points in a visual presentation. Just getting the meeting last Tuesday with the Republican president was an achievement for someone viewed as a contender for her party’s White House nomination in 2028.

Whitmer’s strategy for dealing with Trump highlights the conundrum for her and other Democratic leaders as they try to protect the interests of their states while voicing their opposition to his agenda. It’s a dynamic that Whitmer has navigated much differently from many other Democratic governors.

The fact that Whitmer had “an opening to make direct appeals” in private to Trump was unique in this political moment, said Matt Grossman, a Michigan State University politics professor.

It was her third meeting with Trump at the White House since he took office in January. This one, however, was far less public than the time in April when Whitmer was unwittingly part of an impromptu news conference that embarrassed her so much she covered her face with a folder.

On Tuesday, she told the president that the economic damage from the tariffs could be severe in Michigan, a state that helped deliver him the White House in 2024. Whitmer also brought up federal support for recovery efforts after an ice storm and sought to delay changes to Medicaid.

Trump offered no specific commitments, according to people familiar with the private conversation who were not authorized to discuss it publicly and spoke only on condition of anonymity to describe it.

Whitmer is hardly the only one sounding the warning of the potentially damaging consequences, including factory job losses, lower profits and coming price increases, of the import taxes that Trump has said will be the economic salvation for American manufacturing.

White House spokesman Kush Desai that no other president “has taken a greater interest in restoring American auto industry dominance than President Trump.” Trade frameworks negotiated by the administration would open up the Japanese, Korean and European markets for vehicles made on assembly lines in Michigan, Desai said.

But the outreach Trump has preferred tends to be splashy presentations by tech CEOs. In the Oval Office on Wednesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook gave the president a customized glass plaque with a gold base as Cook promised US$600 billion in investments. Trump claims to have brought in $17 trillion in investment commitments, although none of those numbers has surfaced yet in economic data.

Under his series of executive orders and trade frameworks, U.S. automakers face import taxes of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum, 30 per cent on parts from China and a top rate of 25 per cent on goods from Canada and Mexico not covered under an existing 2020 trade agreement. That puts America’s automakers and parts suppliers at a disadvantage against German, Japanese and South Korean vehicles that only face a 15 per cent import tax negotiated by Trump last month.

On top of that, Trump this past week threatened a 100 per cent tariff on computer chips, which are an integral part of cars and trucks, though he would exclude companies that produce chips domestically from the tax.

Whitmer’s two earlier meetings with Trump resulted in gains for Michigan. But the tariffs represent a significantly broader request of a president who has imposed them even more aggressively in the face of criticism.

Materials in the presentation brought Whitmer to the meeting and obtained by The Associated Press noted how trade with Canada and Mexico has driven $23.2 billion in investment to Michigan since 2020.

General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis operate 50 factories across the state, while more than 4,000 facilities support the auto parts supply chain. Altogether, the sector supports nearly 600,000 manufacturing jobs, forming the backbone of Michigan’s economy.

Whitmer outlined the main points of the materials to Trump and left copies with his team.


To Grossman, the Michigan State professor, a key question is whether voters who expected to be helped by tariffs would react if Trump’s import taxes failed to deliver the promised economic growth.

“Everyone’s aware that Michigan is a critical swing state and the auto industry has outsized influence, not just directly, but symbolically,” Grossman said.

AP VoteCast found that Trump won Michigan in 2024 largely because two-thirds of its voters described the economic conditions as being poor or “not so good.” Roughly 70 per cent of the voters in the state who felt negatively about the economy backed the Republican. The state was essentially split over whether tariffs were a positive, with Trump getting 76 per cent of those voters who viewed them favorably.

The heads of General Motors, Ford and Stellantis have repeatedly warned the administration that the tariffs would cut company profits and undermine their global competitiveness. Their efforts have resulted in little more than a temporary, monthlong pause intended to give companies time to adjust. The reprieve did little to blunt the financial fallout.

In the second quarter alone, Ford reported $800 million in tariff-related costs, while GM said the import taxes cost it $1.1 billion. Those expenses could make it harder to reinvest in new domestic factories, a goal Trump has championed.

“We expect tariffs to be a net headwind of about $2 billion this year, and we’ll continue to monitor the developments closely and engage with policymakers to ensure U.S. autoworkers and customers are not disadvantaged by policy change,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said on his company’s earning call.

Since Trump returned to the White House, Michigan has lost 7,500 manufacturing jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Smaller suppliers have felt the strain, too.

Detroit Axle, a family-run auto parts distributor, has been one of the more vocal companies in Michigan about the impact of the tariffs. The company initially announced it might have to shut down a warehouse and lay off more than 100 workers, but later said it would be able to keep the facility open, at least for now.

“Right now it’s a market of who is able to survive, it’s not a matter of who can thrive,” said Mike Musheinesh, owner of Detroit Axle.

Joey Cappelletti And Josh Boak, The Associated Press

 


Tariffs and Energy Costs Could Spark an Economic Crisis for Germany

  • German industry is being hit hard by new US tariffs, high energy costs, and strict EU climate policies, with SMEs suffering most.

  • The EU–US trade deal imposes 15% tariffs on key exports, pushing many firms to scale back US operations.

  • Political and corporate leaders remain unwilling to challenge the Green Deal despite mounting economic and social costs.

The asymmetrical trade agreement between the EU and the US will further worsen Germany’s recession. Yet neither politicians nor corporate leaders show any willingness to make the sweeping policy changes needed to reverse course.

Germany’s economic data leaves no room for illusions. After contracting by 0.9% in 2023 and another 0.5% last year, the decline will continue this year.

The Machine Room Has Been Blown Apart

It is precisely the sectors that have sustained German prosperity for decades—automobiles, construction, machinery—that are under the heaviest pressure. Without the artificial boost from state spending—now accounting for half of GDP—the private sector is set to shrink by 4–5% this year.

Since 2018, total productivity has been in steady decline. This is also a social problem: Germany is importing hundreds of thousands of welfare migrants into its social systems, yet the economy would have to boom just to keep per capita prosperity from falling.

new survey by the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DIHK) confirms what was already obvious: the EU–US trade deal will especially hurt Germany’s export-oriented economy.

According to the survey, 58% of companies expect additional burdens, rising to 74% for firms with direct US business. Only 5% expect any benefit.

“This deal may have been politically necessary, but for many German companies it’s a bitter pill,” said DIHK CEO Helena Melnikov. “Higher tariffs, more bureaucracy, falling competitiveness”—that’s the price of the diplomatic truce between Washington and Brussels.

As of Thursday, a general 15% tariff applies to exports to the US, hitting automotive and machinery manufacturers hardest. 89% of US-oriented firms report immediate disadvantages, 72% fear further tariff hikes, 80% worry about political arbitrariness in transatlantic trade, and more than half plan to scale back US operations.

Business Was Already Weak

In its May survey of over 21,000 companies, only 23% reported positive business expectations—down five points—while 30% expected deterioration. In industry, one in three anticipates fewer orders.

Just 19% plan to increase investment, while about a third plan to cut back. High energy prices, labor shortages, and political uncertainty are seen as the main drags. The DIHK forecasts a 0.3% recession for 2025, but adjusting for state spending, the real decline is closer to 4–5%.

Daily surveys confirm the same message: Germany is being deindustrialized, losing hundreds of thousands of core-sector jobs. The social security deficits already emerging are just the beginning. Yet both politics and business refuse to conduct an honest diagnosis.

The Green Deal remains sacrosanct. Energy costs for German industry are up to three times higher than for US competitors, double that of French firms—pushing energy-intensive sectors out of the country.

Dancing Around the Golden Calf

Nobody dares openly challenge Brussels’ climate agenda. A rare exception came in June, when a group of works council representatives wrote an open letter to the Chancellor, naming the Green Deal as a root cause of decline.

But most CEOs dodge the question. Mercedes-Benz chief Ola Källenius cites “weak demand, high production costs, and US tariff uncertainty” for falling margins—but ignores the Green Deal’s role. VW CEO Oliver Blume calls for lower energy prices and tax incentives for EVs—essentially more subsidies to keep the transition alive.

Corporate leadership is now fused ideologically with the Green Deal. The energy transition has battered Germany’s industrial base: sectors like construction and automotive have been knocked completely off track.

A Split Economy

Events like the “Made for Germany” coffee chat between 61 CEOs and the Chancellor are symbolic of a corporatist mindset. Large corporations can adjust or relocate production to sidestep regulation, but small and medium-sized enterprises—the Mittelstand—are being crushed.

The Green Deal’s bureaucratic weight ultimately clears the field for big corporations by eliminating smaller competitors.

The Mittelstand has no political backing, and many are fighting daily for survival—often ending in bankruptcy. In H1 2025, insolvencies rose 9.4% year-on-year to 11,900 companies.

There is still no sign of a policy shift on climate. The German corporate elite has failed to seize the initiative to force political change. Germany is heading for a hot autumn—economically and socially.

By Thomas Kolbe via Zerohedge

 

Insurers Urged to Reassess Russian Oil Exposure

  • An insurance association has urged its members to assess their exposure to Russian oil due to upcoming updates to oil price cap regimes by the UK and EU.

  • The divergence in price caps between the UK, EU, and US could affect standard sanctions clauses in insurance policies, particularly for US-led markets or insureds.

  • The insurance body advises any underwriting entity with exposure to Russian oil to take appropriate steps to protect themselves, covering various types of insurance.

An insurance association has urged its members to assess their exposure to Russian oil as the UK and EU prepare to update their oil price cap regimes.

The oil price cap, introduced by the G7, EU, and Australia, aims to restrict Russia’s oil revenues by preventing Russian companies from selling oil above a specified threshold.

In July, the UK and EU announced plans to lower the price cap to further limit Russia’s ability to fund its war in Ukraine. The new measures take effect on 2 September in the UK and 3 September in the EU.

However, the US reportedly opposed the European initiative and did not support lowering the Russian oil price cap.

Because of the divergence in price caps among the three powers, the Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA) has warned its members to reconsider their exposures, as this could affect sanctions clauses.

LMA’s legal and regulatory director, Arabella Ramage, explained: “If a US insured or US lead market uses a $60 oil price cap, the impact for EU or UK insurers could be that any standard sanctions clause in their policies is triggered.”  

The standard LMA oil price cap clauses were drafted with the expectation that the oil price cap coalition would set the same price, stating, “Price cap means the price, or cap, set for the purchase or sale of the Russian oil or the Russian oil product by the price cap coalition as may be amended from time to time,” and refer throughout to the ‘relevant’ price cap.”

As a result, Ramage highlighted: “The divergence between the UK, EU and US approaches means in practice that UK/EU entities may not necessarily be able to follow a US lead on business involving Russian oil unless the US party adopts the UK/EU position on price cap and ensures that they can obtain the necessary supporting documentation to demonstrate compliance with UK/EU requirements.”

The insurance body has advised its members that any underwriting entity with exposure to Russian oil, including hull, cargo, political risk, P&I, and liability or reinsurance, “should take steps to protect themselves appropriately.”

By City AM 

How Much Energy Does ChatGPT’s Newest Model Consume?

  • The energy consumption of the newest version of ChatGPT is significantly higher than previous models, with estimates suggesting it could be up to 20 times more energy-intensive than the first version.

  • There is a severe lack of transparency regarding the energy use and environmental impact of AI models, as there are no mandates forcing AI companies to disclose this information.

  • The increasing energy demands of AI are contributing to rising electricity costs for consumers and raising concerns about the broader environmental impact of the tech industry.



How much energy does the newest version of ChatGPT consume? No one knows for sure, but one thing is certain – it’s a whole lot. OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, hasn’t released any official figures for the large language model’s energy footprints, but academics are working to quantify the energy use for query – and it’s considerably higher than for previous models. 

There are no mandates forcing AI companies to disclose their energy use or environmental impact, so most do not offer up those kinds of statistics publicly. As of May of this year, 84 percent of all large language model traffic was conducted on AI models with zero environmental disclosures. 

“It blows my mind that you can buy a car and know how many miles per gallon it consumes, yet we use all these AI tools every day and we have absolutely no efficiency metrics, emissions factors, nothing,” says Sasha Luccioni, climate lead at an AI company called Hugging Face. “It’s not mandated, it’s not regulatory. Given where we are with the climate crisis, it should be top of the agenda for regulators everywhere,” she continued.

Sam Altman, the Chief Executive Officer of OpenAI, has thrown out some figures into the public sphere – saying that ChatGPT consumes 0.34 watt-hours of energy and 0.000085 gallons of water per query – but has left out key details like what model these numbers refer to, and has offered no backup or corroboration for his statements. 

Experts from outside the OpenAI fold have estimated that ChatGPT-5 may use as much as 20 times more energy as the first version of ChatGPT, and at the very least uses several times more. “A more complex model like GPT-5 consumes more power both during training and during inference. It’s also targeted at long thinking … I can safely say that it’s going to consume a lot more power than GPT-4,” Rakesh Kumar, a professor at the University of Illinois, recently told The Guardian. Kumar’s current work focuses on AI’s energy consumption. 

While a query to ChatGPT in 2023 would have consumed about 2 watt-hours, researchers at the University of Rhode Island’s AI lab found that ChatGPT-5 can use up to 40 watt-hours of electricity to configure a medium-length response (around 1,000 tokens). On average, they estimate that the model uses slightly over 18 watt-hours for such a response. This places ChatGPT-5 at a higher energy consumption rate than any other of the AI models they track save for two: OpenAI’s o3 reasoning model and Deepseek’s R1.

Calculating these estimated energy consumption rates was no easy feat, considering the severe lack of transparency in the sector, in spite of increasing scrutiny. “It’s more critical than ever to address AI’s true environmental cost,” University of Rhode Island professor Marwan Abdelatti told The Guardian. “We call on OpenAI and other developers to use this moment to commit to full transparency by publicly disclosing GPT-5’s environmental impact.”

While tech companies consume more and more energy each year to power their AI ambitions, common consumers are suffering the consequences. It’s consumers who are footing the bill for skyrocketing energy usage. The New York Times warns that “electricity rates for individuals and small businesses could rise sharply as Amazon, Google, Microsoft and other technology companies build data centers and expand into the energy business.” Moreover, Silicon Valley's backtracking on climate pledges will directly impact global communities, whether or not they ever use AI.

"We are witnessing a massive transfer of wealth from residential utility customers to large corporations—data centers and large utilities and their corporate parents, which profit from building additional energy infrastructure," Maryland People's Counsel David Lapp recently told Business Insider.

"Utility regulation is failing to protect residential customers, contributing to an energy affordability crisis.”

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com 


bioEnergy Launches Modular Waste-to-Energy Microgrids for AI & Crypto Power Need

bioEnergy Development Inc. announced the commercial launch of a containerized waste-to-energy microgrid solution capable of delivering approximately 1 GWh of dispatchable electricity. The system, tested on wood residues and cattle manure, targets energy-intensive AI, high-performance computing (HPC), and crypto mining operations facing grid constraints.

Context

The company’s “waste-to-watts” model positions its bioReactor technology as a rapid-deployment alternative to emerging micro nuclear power. Each factory-built 40-foot unit is designed to be mobile, stackable, and commissionable in months rather than years. By turning biowaste into syngas, biochar, and high-grade carbon products, the system provides both clean power and durable carbon sequestration—appealing to tech giants with public net-zero commitments.

The bioreactors generate multiple revenue streams:

  • Syngas for behind-the-meter or grid export power

  • Biochar for soil performance and carbon removal credits

  • Biocarbon for industrial carbon replacement products

Excess biochar, blended with bio-stimulants, is aimed at the high-value carbon credit market, a sector attracting corporate buyers seeking verifiable, durable offsets.

Strategic Significance

For AI and HPC operators, the proposition is speed, cost efficiency, and resilience. The company claims operating costs are just 5–10% of micro-nuclear power generation, with the added advantage of on-site fuel security and islandable microgrid capability. The technology also eliminates waste streams from power production and supports decarbonization via methane avoidance and diesel displacement.

Market Outlook

bioEnergy is actively seeking partnerships with hyperscale data centers, colocation providers, and industrial operators for co-location pilots and long-term offtake agreements under a “power-as-a-service” or joint-venture model. Typical configurations range from 1.5 MWh to 1 GWh.