Monday, September 29, 2025

 

Startling images show how antibiotic pierces bacteria’s armor





University College London

Startling images show how antibiotic pierces bacteria’s armour 

image: 

Composite image of E. coli exposed to the polymyxin antibiotic – the images show the changes to the outer layer of armour over time. From left to right: bacterium untreated by the antibiotic; bacterium after 15 minutes; after 30 minutes; after 60 minutes; after 90 minutes. The white scale bar is 250 nanometres across.

view more 

Credit: Carolina Borrelli, Edward Douglas et al. / Nature Microbiology.




A team led by UCL (University College London) and Imperial College London researchers has shown for the first time how life-saving antibiotics called polymyxins pierce the armour of harmful bacteria.

The findings, published in the journal Nature Microbiology, could lead to new treatments for bacterial infections – especially urgent since drug-resistant infections already kill more than a million people a year.

Polymyxins were discovered more than 80 years ago and are used as a last-resort treatment for infections caused by “Gram negative” bacteria. These bacteria have an outer surface layer that acts like armour and prevents certain antibiotics from penetrating the cell. Polymyxins are known to target this outer layer, but how they disrupt it and then kill bacteria is still not understood.

In the new study, the research team revealed in high-resolution images and biochemical experiments how the antibiotic Polymyxin B rapidly caused bumps and bulges to break out on the surface of an E. coli bacterial cell.

These protrusions, which appeared within minutes, were followed by the bacterium rapidly shedding its outer armour.

The antibiotic, the researchers concluded, had triggered the cell to produce and shed its armour. The more the cell tried to make new amour, the more it lost the amour it was making, at such a rate that it left gaps in its defences, allowing the antibiotic to enter the cell and kill it.

However, the team found that this process – protrusions, fast production and shedding of armour, and cell death – only occurred when the cell was active. In dormant (sleeping) bacteria, armour production is switched off, making the antibiotic ineffective.

Co-senior author Dr Andrew Edwards, from Imperial, said: “For decades we’ve assumed that antibiotics that target bacterial armour were able to kill the microbes in any state, whether they’re actively replicating or they were dormant. But this isn’t the case. Through capturing these incredible images of single cells, we’ve been able to show that this class of antibiotics only work with help from the bacterium, and if the cells go into a hibernation-like state, the drugs no longer work - which is very surprising.”

Becoming dormant allows bacteria to survive unfavourable conditions such as a lack of food. They can stay dormant for many years and “wake up” when conditions become more favourable. This can allow bacteria to survive against antibiotics, for instance, and reawaken to cause recurrent infections in the body.

Co-senior author Professor Bart Hoogenboom, based at the London Centre for Nanotechnology at UCL, said: “Polymyxins are an important line of defence against Gram-negative bacteria, which cause many deadly drug-resistant infections. It is important we understand how they work.

“Our next challenge is to use these findings to make the antibiotics more effective. One strategy might be to combine polymyxin treatment – counterintuitively – with treatments that promote armour production and/or wake up ‘sleeping’ bacteria so these cells can be eliminated too.

“Our work also shows we need to take into account what state bacteria are in when we are assessing the effectiveness of antibiotics.”

The E. coli cells were imaged at the London Centre for Nanotechnology at UCL. A tiny needle, only a few nanometres wide, was run over the bacterial cell, “feeling” the shape to create an image (a technique called atomic force microscopy) at much higher resolution than would be possible using light.

Co-author Carolina Borrelli, a PhD student at the London Centre for Nanotechnology at UCL, said: “It was incredible seeing the effect of the antibiotic at the bacterial surface in real-time. Our images of the bacteria directly show how much polymyxins can compromise the bacterial armour. It is as if the cell is forced to produce ‘bricks’ for its outer wall at such a rate that this wall becomes disrupted, allowing the antibiotic to infiltrate.”

The team compared how active (growing) and inactive E. coli cells responded to polymyxin B in the lab, finding that the antibiotic efficiently eliminated active cells but did not kill dormant cells.

They also tested the E. coli cells’ response with and without access to sugar (a food source that wakes up dormant cells). When sugar was present, the antibiotic killed previously dormant cells, but only after a delay of 15 minutes – the time needed for the bacteria to consume the sugar and resume production of its outer armour.

In conditions where the antibiotic was effective, the researchers detected more armour being released from the bacteria. They also observed the bulges occurring across the surface of the cell.

In conditions where it was ineffective, the antibiotic bound itself to the outer membrane but caused little damage.

Co-author Dr Ed Douglas, from Imperial, said: “We observed that disruption of the outermost armour of the bacteria only occurred when the bacteria were consuming sugar. Once we knew that, we could quickly figure out what was happening.”

Co-author Professor Boyan Bonev, of the University of Nottingham, said: “Working together has given us unique insights into bacterial physiology and morphology under stress that have remained hidden for decades. Now we understand better the weak points of bacteria.” 

This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), parts of UK Research and Innovation, and by Wellcome. 

MEDICAL FALSE IMPRISONMENT PAYS BILLS

Patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities substantially over-represented among long-stay psychiatric inpatients





Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences





Toronto, ON, September 29, 2025 – Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) account for more than one in five patients who have been in Ontario’s mental health beds for over a year, according to a new study from researchers at ICES and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH).

The findings suggest that people with IDD have different support needs compared with patients without IDD as they are more likely to have moderate or severe cognitive impairment, difficulty caring for themselves, and few social supports, which may contribute to challenges transitioning out of hospital and into the community. Enhancing specialized supports both in hospital and in the community could reduce their length of stay and admission rates.

“We know what is needed for successful transitions and we have published Ontario Practice Guidance on how to do this well,” says Avra Selick, lead author and scientist within the Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre at CAMH. “There are amazing champions out there working hard to support these transitions, but we urgently need to build capacity in the hospital, community and health and social services sectors to work together to achieve widespread change.

Key findings:

  • Of the 1,466 patients in Ontario mental health beds for over a year on September 30, 2023, 322 were people with IDD.
  • Compared with inpatients without IDD, a higher proportion of those with IDD were younger and had a psychotic disorder. Almost 40 per cent of these individuals were autistic.
  • Patients with IDD were more likely to be physically restrained or experience seclusion in hospital, and only five per cent were in specialized units for people with IDD. The remainder were in other psychiatric units where providers were not trained to work with them.
  • More than half of long-stay patients with IDD lacked social or familial connections to support their discharge from hospital.

The authors recommend increasing capacity and developing the expertise of providers within hospital settings to deliver appropriate care for patients with IDD. They also recommend enhancing outpatient mental health services, housing, and disability-related supports in the community. These strategies can prevent unnecessary hospitalizations, reduce length of stay and support successful transitions back into the community.

Resources on how to support transitions out of hospital for patients with IDD are available through the H-CARDD program led out of CAMH.

“Adults with IDD make up a substantial proportion of long-stay admissions in units that were not designed to meet their needs, with very few hospital staff trained to support this population,” says Yona Lunsky, ICES scientist and Director of the Azrieli Centre at CAMH. “We need to invest in improving their care once they are in hospital while also addressing the challenges that lead to these lengthy hospitalizations in the first place.”

The study “Long-stay psychiatric inpatients with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities: an Ontario population-based study” is in the September issue of The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

 

ICES is an independent, not-for-profit research and analytics institute that uses population-based health information to produce knowledge on a broad range of healthcare issues. ICES leads cutting-edge studies and analyses evaluating healthcare policy, delivery, and population outcomes. Our knowledge is highly regarded in Canada and abroad and is widely used by government, hospitals, planners, and practitioners to make decisions about healthcare delivery and to develop policy. For the latest ICES news, follow us on BlueSky and LinkedIn: @ICESOntario 
 

The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) is Canada's largest mental health and addiction teaching hospital and a world leading research centre in this field. CAMH combines clinical care, research, education, policy development and health promotion to help transform the lives of people affected by mental illness and addiction. CAMH is fully affiliated with the University of Toronto and is a Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Collaborating Centre. For more information, please visit camh.ca or follow @CAMHnews on Bluesky and LinkedIn.


 

Many older adults – especially Gen X women – show signs of addiction to ultra-processed foods



Adults age 50 to 80 who meet criteria for an addiction to ultra-processed foods are far more likely to report being overweight, or beng in fair or poor mental or physical health




Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan





They were the first generation of Americans to grow up with ultra-processed foods all around them – products typically loaded with extra fat, salt, sugar and flavorings. They were children and young adults at a time when such products, designed to maximize their appeal, proliferated.

Now, a study shows, 21% of women and 10% of men in Generation X and the tail end of the Baby Boom generation, now in their 50s and early 60s, meet criteria for addiction to these ultra-processed foods.

That rate is far higher than it is among adults who grew up just a decade or two earlier, and only encountered ultra-processed foods in adulthood. Among adults age 65 to 80, just 12% of women and 4% of men meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction.

The study, published in the journal Addiction by a team from the University of Michigan, is based on nationally representative data from more than 2,000 older Americans surveyed by the U-M National Poll on Healthy Aging.

The poll is based at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation and supported by Michigan Medicine, U-M’s academic medical center. The new paper builds on a previous poll report by diving deeper into generational differences and correlations with health.

Measuring food addiction in an under-studied group

The researchers used the modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0), a standardized tool adapted from the criteria used to diagnose substance use disorders. The scale asks about 13 experiences with ultraprocessed foods and drinks that define addiction, such as strong cravings, repeated unsuccessful attempts to cut down, withdrawal symptoms, and avoiding social activities because of fear of overeating.

In this case, the “substance” is not alcohol or nicotine, but highly rewarding ultra-processed foods such as sweets, fast food, and sugary beverages. By applying clinical addiction criteria to ultra-processed foods, the study highlights the ways in which such foods can “hook” people.

“We hope this study fills a gap in knowledge about addiction to ultra-processed foods among older adults, as measured by a well-studied and standardized scale,” said Lucy K. Loch, a graduate student in the U-M Department of Psychology. “Today’s older adults were in a key developmental period when our nation’s food environment changed. With other research showing clear links between consumption of these foods and risk of chronic disease and premature death, it’s important to study addiction to ultra-processed foods in this age group.”

Differences by gender

Unlike traditional substance use disorders — which historically have been more common in older men — ultra-processed food addiction shows the opposite pattern: higher prevalence in older women.

One explanation may be the aggressive marketing of “diet” ultra-processed food to women in the 1980s.

Low-fat cookies, microwaveable meals, and other carbohydrate-heavy products were promoted as weight-control solutions, but their engineered nutrient profiles may have reinforced addictive eating patterns.

Women now aged 50 to 64 may have been exposed to ultraprocessed foods during a sensitive developmental window, which may help explain the poll’s findings for this age group, said senior author Ashley Gearhardt, Ph.D., a professor of psychology at U-M and member of IHPI. Gearhardt leads the U-M Food and Addiction Science & Treatment Lab.

“The percentages we see in these data far outpace the percentages of older adults with problematic use of other addictive substances, such as alcohol and tobacco,” said Gearhardt. “We also see a clear association with health and social isolation, with much higher risks of ultra-processed food addiction in those who call their mental or physical health status fair or poor, or say they sometimes or often feel isolated from others.”

Key findings related to overweight, health status and social isolation

  • Overweight self-perception:
    • Women aged 50 to 80 who said they are overweight were more than 11 times as likely to meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction than women who say their weight is about right. Men who reported being overweight were 19 times as likely.
    • No matter what their age, 33% of women who described themselves as overweight, 13% of women who described themselves as slightly overweight and 17% of men who described themselves as overweight met criteria for addiction to ultra-processed foods. Of the total sample, 31% of women and 26% of men in the sample said they were overweight and 40% of women and 39% of men said they were slightly overweight.
  • Health status:
    • Men reporting fair or poor mental health were four times as likely to meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction; women were nearly three times as likely.
    • For physical health, men reporting fair or poor health were three times as likely to meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction, and women were nearly two times as likely.
  • Social isolation: Men and women who reported feeling isolated some of the time or often were more than three times as likely to meet criteria for ultra-processed food addiction as those who did not report isolation.

The researchers suggest that individuals who perceive themselves as overweight may be particularly vulnerable to “health-washed” ultra-processed foods – those marketed as low-fat, low-calorie, high-protein or high-fiber, but still formulated to amplify their appeal and maximize craving.

“These products are sold as health foods – which can be especially problematic for those trying to reduce the number of calories they consume,” Gearhardt said. “This especially affects women, because of the societal pressure around weight.”

Looking Ahead

The generation of older adults now in their 50s and early 60s is the first to live most of their lifespan in a food environment dominated by ultra-processed foods, Geahardt noted.

“These findings raise urgent questions about whether there are critical developmental windows when exposure to ultra-processed foods is especially risky for addiction vulnerability,” she said. “Children and adolescents today consume even higher proportions of calories from ultra-processed foods than today’s middle-aged adults did in their youth. If current trends continue, future generations may show even higher rates of ultra-processed food addiction later in life.”

She added, “Just as with other substances, intervening early may be essential to reducing long-term addiction risk across the lifespan.”

About the study

The study was funded by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-2241144) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health (5R01DA055027).

In addition to Loch and Gearhardt, the study’s co-authors are Matthias Kirch, M.S., Dianne C. Singer, M.P.H, Erica Solway, Ph.D., M.S.W., M.P.H., J. Scott Roberts, Ph.D. and poll director Jeffrey T. Kullgren, M.D., M.P.H., M.S. Roberts is a member of the faculty at the U-M School of Public Health, and Kullgren is a member of the faculty in the U-M Medical School and a primary care physician at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System.

Learn more about the National Poll on Healthy Aging, including methodology, at https://www.healthyagingpoll.org/

 

Citation: Ultra-processed food addiction in a nationally representative sample of older adults in the USA, Addiction, DOI: 10.1111/add.70186, https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70186

 

 

Japan’s national standardized health checkup program: impacts on self-employed and unemployed populations



Researchers assess how expanding municipal expenses on health checkup programs affect health outcomes and behaviors of self-employed and unemployed citizens




Waseda University

Impact of expanding municipal expenses on health checkup programs on self-employed and unemployed populations 

image: 

A new study has now evaluated the positive impacts of Specific Health Checkups and Specific Health Guidance standardization particularly among the self-employed and unemployed populations. The study highlights the improvements in health outcomes and lifestyle behaviors among these populations, and also the economic viability of expanding municipal resources for scaling up such health checkup programs.

view more 

Credit: Dr. Masato Oikawa from Waseda University, Japan




Rapidly aging populations and rising cases of lifestyle-related diseases (LRDs), like diabetes and hypertension, are driving significant financial strain on government budgets. While regular health checkups under a standardized government program can be a solution, it is not well understood how these initiatives benefit different socioeconomic sections of the society and their economic feasibility. Most studies have documented how health checkup programs affect salaried or employed workers, examining the program’s role in informing individuals about their health status and risks. However, there is limited research on self-employed and unemployed populations, even though these socioeconomic communities are at a greater risk of developing LRDs.

To mitigate this research gap, Assistant Professor Masato Oikawa from the Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Japan, evaluated the effects of health screening programs on health outcomes, municipal healthcare expenditure, and behaviors among self-employed and unemployed individuals. Dr. Oikawa along with Mr. Takamasa Otake from University of Pennsylvania, United States, Dr. Toshihide Awatani from Kochi Medical School, Japan, Dr. Haruko Noguchi and Dr. Akira Kawamura from Waseda University, used the Specific Health Checkups and Specific Health Guidance (SHC-SHG), implemented by the Japanese government in 2008, as the basis of their assessment.

We used dosing difference-in-differences estimation and subgroup analysis to explore the effects of increasing municipal expenditure under the SHC-SHG policy standardization on health outcomes and behaviors among the self-employed and unemployed individuals. Additionally, we did a back-of-the-envelope calculation to estimate the cost-effectiveness of this increase in municipal funds for health checkup programs,” explains Dr. Oikawa. Their study was  made available online on August 08, 2025, and was published in Volume 103 of the Journal of Health Economics on September 01, 2025.

The assessments revealed that the SHC-SHG program led to a 16% reduction in the number of self-employed and unemployed people diagnosed with LRDs, with more noticeable effects on individuals with multiple diagnoses than those with a single diagnosis. This suggests that the program is effective in reducing the number of patients with severe conditions, in addition to lowering the overall prevalence of LRD cases.

However, the resultant health improvements were only seen among self-employed individuals and homeowners, but not among unemployed people and renters. Despite this, there were significant good behavioral changes among both self-employed and unemployed people, including a 50% increase in smoking cessation rates, 91% reduction in alcohol consumption, and 163.5% increase in people walking more than 8,000 steps daily.

Furthermore, the increase in municipal health checkup funds was found to be cost-effective, with the overall reduction in medical expenses outweighing the increase in municipal costs by approximately nine times (USD 216.4 million reduction versus USD 23.7 million increase). This suggests that preventive health services and checkups are crucial for improving public health outcomes for lower socioeconomic populations— who face higher risks of LRDs— and thereby mitigating the future financial burden on municipalities.

These findings have clear and immediate applications for policymakers in Japan and other countries facing similar demographic and public health challenges. Policymakers should design and prioritize preventive healthcare programs, particularly for socioeconomically vulnerable populations, to improve public health and reduce long-term costs. Moreover, these programs must be tailored to different socioeconomic groups, addressing the barriers specific to unemployed individuals, such as the perceived high cost of checkups or a lack of understanding about the asymptomatic nature of LRDs.

Our research demonstrates the economic value of standardized health checkups for improving a country’s overall resilience to public health crises and also sheds light on areas where such programs can be upgraded and made more equitable for everyone. We believe that addressing the health needs of all socioeconomic populations is crucial for the sustainability of the social security system,” concludes Dr. Oikawa.

 

***


Reference
Authors: 
Masato Oikawaa,b , Takamasa Otakec,b, Toshihide Awatanid,b, Haruko Noguchie,b, and Akira Kawamuraf,b
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103046
Affiliations: aFaculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Japan
bWaseda Institute of Social & Human Capital Studies (WISH), Japan
cWharton School, University of Pennsylvania, United States
dDepartment of Family Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Japan
eFaculty of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Japan
fFaculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Japan


About Waseda University
Located in the heart of Tokyo, Waseda University is a leading private research university that has long been dedicated to academic excellence, innovative research, and civic engagement at both the local and global levels since 1882. The University has produced many changemakers in its history, including eight prime ministers and many leaders in business, science and technology, literature, sports, and film. Waseda has strong collaborations with overseas research institutions and is committed to advancing cutting-edge research and developing leaders who can contribute to the resolution of complex, global social issues. The University has set a target of achieving a zero-carbon campus by 2032, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations in 2015. 
To learn more about Waseda University, visit https://www.waseda.jp/top/en


About Assistant Professor Masato Oikawa from Waseda University
Dr. Masato Oikawa has been an Assistant Professor (tenure-track) at the Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, Japan, since April 2025. Before this, he taught as an Assistant Professor in the non-tenure track at other faculties at Waseda University. He completed his Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Tokyo. Dr. Oikawa’s research focus lies in health economics, applied microeconometrics, and economics of education. He has 10 peer-reviewed publications to his name. He is the recipient of the Excellent Paper Award at the 12th Applied Econometrics Conference and the 30th Hongyo Prize from Yokohama National University.

 

How could AI help (and hurt) forestry?



Northern Arizona University






The whole world is buzzing about the potential and pitfalls of artificial intelligence—including those who work in forestry.

AI could revolutionize forestry, making it possible to save more lives and ecosystems through faster and more accurate data analysis. But if forestry professionals aren’t careful, AI could also botch critical land-management and policy decisions. 

That’s why NAU School of Forestry faculty members Alark Saxena, Luke Ritter and Derek Uhey took it upon themselves to understand foresters’ relationship with AI: how they’re using it now, how they hope to leverage it in the future and what concerns them. They conducted 20 in-depth interviews with forestry professionals in the Southwest and recently published their findings in Forest Policy and Economics

“We noticed a great deal of discussion about the potential of AI in forestry, but very little research on how the professionals on the ground actually feel about it,” Saxena, an associate professor of human dimensions of forestry, said. “This study was our first investigation into the topic, motivated by the need to understand the human side of this technological shift.” 

In their interviews with foresters working across academia, government and private industry, the research team discovered that no one in forestry wants AI to replace human expertise or make critical decisions without oversight from real people.

“They are particularly concerned about the ‘black box’ problem where they can’t understand AI’s decision-making process, creating serious accountability issues,” Saxena said. “A key concern they shared was the risk of training AI using some agencies’ poor-quality or biased data and then trusting its flawed outputs for important land management or policy analysis”—like mandates on where to administer prescribed burns or allow clear-cutting.

But the forestry professionals they interviewed agreed AI could be a useful tool in supporting some aspects of their work. With current labor shortages leaving them overworked and burned out, the workers agreed they’d welcome AI help with monotonous tasks like summarizing information, lesson planning and filling out routine paperwork.

“They also see great potential in using AI for complex data analysis, such as with light detection and ranging, as long as it functions as an assistant that enhances, rather than replaces, the judgment of an experienced professional,” Saxena said.

Ritter said he hopes others across the United States and the globe will conduct interviews with forestry professionals to capture a wider range of perspectives on AI. Getting a full understanding of professionals’ fears about—and recommendations for—the use of AI could help leaders create policies that guide future forestry work.

"It's challenging to ethically implement AI when we, as foresters, have gaps in our knowledge about how and why it's being used,” Ritter said. “This study highlighted some interesting themes, but we need to keep discussing AI in the classroom and the workplace. We hope this paper provides a foundation for policy changes and further research as AI continues to grow."