Monday, October 06, 2025

 

New Canadian study reveals where HIV hides in different parts of the body





University of Western Ontario
Stephen Barr 

image: 

A new study, co-led by Western University’s Stephen Barr, reveals that HIV cloaks itself in the DNA of infected cells using unique DNA patterns in the brain, blood and parts of the digestive tract.

view more 

Credit: Frank Neufeld





New Canadian study reveals where HIV hides in different parts of the body

Researchers at Western University and the University of Calgary have discovered how HIV hides in different parts of the body by embedding itself into the DNA of cells in a tissue-specific manner, offering new insights into why the virus is so difficult to eliminate and cure – even decades after infection and treatment.

The study, led by Western University’s Stephen Barr and UCalgary’s Guido van Marle, reveals that HIV cloaks itself in the DNA of infected cells using unique DNA patterns in the brain, blood and parts of the digestive tract. For example, in the brain, the virus avoids genes and hides in less active parts of the DNA.

The findings were published by the high impact journal Communications Medicine.

“We found that HIV doesn’t integrate randomly. Instead, it follows unique patterns in different tissues, possibly shaped by the local environment and immune responses,” said Barr, microbiology and immunology professor at Western’s Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry. “This helps explain how HIV manages to persist in the body for decades, and why certain tissues may act as reservoirs of infection.”

For the study, Barr, van Marle and their collaborators at the Southern Alberta HIV Clinic and University of Alberta used rare tissue samples from people living with the virus during the early years of the HIV/AIDS pandemic (around 1993), before modern treatment existed. This gave the researchers a unique opportunity to look at how the virus behaved in its natural state across different organs – all within the same individuals.

“Our study is a powerful example of how we can learn from historic samples to better understand a virus that continues to affect tens of millions of people worldwide,” said Barr.

The research team acknowledges the individuals who volunteered to participate in studies during the early, uncertain days of the HIV/AIDS pandemic.

“Their willingness to contribute samples, at a time of stigma, fear and with limited treatment options, was an act of bravery, foresight and generosity that continues to advance scientific understanding of HIV and save lives today,” said van Marle, microbiology, immunology and infectious diseases professor at UCalgary’s Cumming School of Medicine.  

New targeted attack

For this novel Canadian approach to understanding HIV, the researchers investigated historic samples taken from the esophagus, blood, stomach, small intestine and colon of individuals with unmatched brain tissue from other individuals. They evaluated how often the virus integrated into specific regions of the genome and compared these patterns across various tissues from different individuals.

“Knowing where the virus hides in our genomes will help us identify ways to target those cells and tissues with targeted therapeutic approaches – either by eliminating these cells or ‘silencing’ the virus,” said van Marle.

The research was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the National Health Research and Development Program and builds on years of collaborative work between Western, UCalgary, the Southern Alberta HIV Clinic and UAlberta.

“Studies like this are highly collaborative and only possible when many of us work together,” said Barr. 

 

Lidocaine poisonings rise despite overall drop in local anesthetic toxicity




University of Illinois Chicago





Over the last decade, poisonings and deaths linked to the use of local anesthetics have decreased. Even so, poisonings from one commonly used anesthetic, lidocaine, have increased in the United States, according to two new studies from the University of Illinois Chicago.

By analyzing data from reports to national Poison Control Centers and to the Food and Drug Administration from 2010 to 2020, UIC researchers found total reports of poisonings fell 50% in that period. But poisonings from lidocaine increased more than 50% in less than half that time, between 2016 and 2020. The findings are published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine and the British Journal of Anesthesia.

Local anesthetics, including lidocaine, are widely used in medical care to manage pain before, during and after surgical procedures. General anesthesia acts everywhere in the body and puts patients in a sleep-like state. Local anesthesia controls pain and immobilizes a specific region of the body while a patient remains conscious.

Local anesthetics numb an area of the body by blocking nerve signals, explained Dr. Michael Fettiplace, an assistant professor in the anesthesiology department in the College of Medicine. “They’re incredibly useful drugs, and second to opioids, local anesthetics are the No. 2 pain control tool that we have.”

Today, lidocaine is “undoubtedly the most frequently used local anesthetic,” Fettiplace said. Its applications are numerous: to numb an area of skin before getting stitches, to prevent arrhythmias and to coat the throat in preparation for an upper endoscopy, for example. Lidocaine is also available over the counter in topical patches and creams marketed to soothe sore backs and hemorrhoid pain, for instance.

Like all drugs, lidocaine and other local anesthetics carry both benefits and risks. After administration, blood vessels absorb and transport local anesthetics to the liver, where they are processed and detoxified. But if a patient gets too much of the drug, extreme blocking of nerve channels can progress to seizures, lethal arrythmias or cardiac arrest, a phenomenon known as local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

In 1998, UIC anesthesiologist and professor Dr. Guy Weinberg discovered that an intravenous treatment called lipid emulsion could treat the issue. “This was a revolution in the anesthesia field,” Fettiplace said. “All of a sudden, patients who arrested and died of local anesthetic systemic toxicity now had a treatment which, in many anecdotal cases, rapidly alleviated the toxic symptoms and prevented deaths.”

In 2010, several professional societies in the United States and the United Kingdom developed recommendations to identify, prevent and treat poisonings from local anesthetics, with the use of lipid emulsions at their center. A decade later, Fettiplace and his colleagues set out to see how these advisories have affected reported poisonings and deaths associated with the drugs.

The researchers analyzed reports submitted to the National Poison Data System, the database of all 53 Poison Control Centers in the United States, and to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, a database of similar reports collected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Through their analyses, they found fatalities mostly occur when the lidocaine is delivered either by vein or to coat the throat, and almost always when given at extremely high doses, sometimes as much as four times the upper limit, Fettiplace said.

This issue is compounded by the availability of high-dose delivery methods and the potential for accidental overdose by emergency medical personnel. The authors suggest that enhanced education and updated recommendations could mitigate these risks, as recommendations have been successful in decreasing overall poisonings and deaths from anesthesia.

The local anesthesia advisories and the surrounding changes in the science had an instrumental impact, Fettiplace said. “The data indicates that there’s been a reduction either in the number of events or the number of adverse outcomes by about 50% over the past 15 years,” he said.

Still, the rise in lidocaine-related poisonings signals that current safeguards may not be enough. Fettiplace and his colleagues believe that new, more targeted recommendations could further reduce harm.

“We think if we have updated advisories that are more targeted to some of the problems that we see occurring now, those may have impacts 10 years down the line,” he said.

In addition to Fettiplace and Weinberg, UIC authors on the studies include Heather Nixon, Alexandra Barabanova and Christopher Chiang.

Politics follow you on the road

People are more likely to honk at bad drivers with political bumper stickers




University of Cincinnati

Bumper Sticker 

image: 

Participants were asked to watch a short simulation of a vehicle cutting them off in traffic. The offending vehicle had either no bumper sticker or a bumper sticker with a neutral I love my dog sticker, Proud Republican sticker or Proud Democrat sticker.

view more 

Credit: UC





Nobody wants to admit that a lowly bumper sticker can influence their behavior.

But researchers at the University of Cincinnati found that drivers were far more likely to honk after being cut off by a vehicle bearing a political bumper sticker, particularly one for the opposing political party.

“Bumper stickers are a meaningful way in which partisan divides are reinforced in everyday life,” UC researchers concluded. “They have tangible impacts on road safety. Partisan bumper stickers may be mundane, but they are not trivial.”

For a study published in the journal Frontiers in Political Science, UC Assistant Professors Rachel Torres and Ben Farrer explored political polarization in apolitical settings — like driving.

They conducted attitude surveys with paid volunteers who then took part in a short driving simulation. In half of the simulations, another vehicle cuts off participants without signaling. The offending vehicle featured either no sticker or one of three bumper stickers: “Proud Democrat,” “Proud Republican” or the neutral “I love my dog.”

In the other half of simulations, the other vehicle stays in its own lane before making an unremarkable left turn.

A follow-up survey found that drivers said they were significantly more likely to honk in the videos where the offending vehicles expressed support for the opposition party compared to those sporting stickers supporting their own party or a love for dogs.

“It activated their partisan hostilities,” said Torres, who teaches political science in UC’s School of Public and International Affairs.

“We have a unique car culture in the United States. American identity is often tied to owning a car and how you choose to decorate it,” she said. “So we wanted to ask: Has American car culture been politicized? Has it become more partisan?”

The answer, it turns out, is yes.

“These feelings are just below the surface for many people,” Torres said.

Researchers recruited U.S. adult residents who answered a questionnaire with identifying information about gender, age, race, education and partisan identity. They also completed a personality test to find out how agreeable and authoritarian they are since both how nice and how sensitive one is to rule-breaking can be relevant to driving habits. Nondrivers were dropped from the study population.

Participants watched a short digitally animated dashcam video of a vehicle driving in the right lane of an empty four-lane road when a sport utility vehicle driving just out of frame swerves into their lane briefly before returning to its lane.

Participants then were asked on a five-point scale how likely they were to honk in their given scenario. And they took a final survey to measure their feelings toward the other driver. That survey found that partisan bumper stickers do not trigger more patience or grace toward drivers of the same political affiliation but did trigger more hostility toward those of the opposing ideology.

“We never found bumper stickers to have a positive impact. They didn’t increase people’s perceptions of their group or other groups,” she said.


Bumper Sticker [VIDEO] 

For a new study published in the journal Frontiers in Political Science, survey respondents watched a driving simulation in which they are cut off by a vehicle. Researchers found that respondents were significantly more likely to say they would honk at vehicles bearing political bumper stickers, particularly if the sticker supported their opposing party.

Credit

UC School of Public and International Affairs