Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Ancient lead exposure shaped evolution of human brain


A groundbreaking international study changes the view that exposure to the toxic metal lead is largely a post-industrial phenomenon. Instead, the findings reveal our human ancestors were periodically exposed to lead for over two million years.


Southern Cross University

Infographic showing lead exposure in modern times and with ancestors 

image: 

Infographic shows:

* lead exposure to humans in modern times versus our ancestors

* how teeth fossil and brain tissue were analysed for this study

* how the modern NOVA1 gene may have protected modern humans against undesirable effects of lead

view more 

Credit: J Gregory @2025 Mount Sinai Health System




A groundbreaking international study changes the view that exposure to the toxic metal lead is largely a post-industrial phenomenon. The research reveals that our human ancestors were periodically exposed to lead for over two million years, and that the toxic metal may have influenced the evolution of hominid brains, behaviour, and even the development of language.

Moreover, the study – published in Science Advances – adds a piece to the puzzle of how humans outcompeted their cousins, the Neanderthals. Brain organoid models with Neanderthal genetics were more susceptible to the impacts of lead than human brains, suggesting that lead exposure was more harmful to Neanderthals.

Led by researchers from the Geoarchaeology and Archaeometry Research Group (GARG) at Southern Cross University (Australia), the Department of Environmental Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital (New York, USA), and the School of Medicine at the University of California San Diego (UCSD, USA), the research combined novel fossil geochemistry, cutting-edge brain organoid experiments, and pioneer evolutionary genetics to uncover a surprising story about lead’s role in human history.

A toxic thread through human evolution

Until now, scientists believed lead exposure was largely a modern phenomenon, linked to human activities such as mining, smelting, and the use of leaded petrol and paint. By analysing 51 fossil teeth from hominid and great ape species, including Australopithecus africanusParanthropus robustus, early Homo, Neanderthals, and Homo sapiens, the team discovered clear chemical signatures of intermittent lead exposure stretching back almost two million years.

Using high-precision laser-ablation geochemistry at Southern Cross University’s GARG Facility (located in Lismore, NSW) and Mount Sinai’s Exposomics state-of-the-art facilities, the researchers found distinctive ‘lead bands’ in the teeth, formed during childhood as the enamel and dentine grew. These bands reveal repeated episodes of lead uptake from both environmental sources (such as contaminated water, soil, or volcanic activity) and from the body’s own bone stores, released during stress or illness.

“Our data show that lead exposure wasn’t just a product of the Industrial Revolution – it was part of our evolutionary landscape,” said Professor Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Head of the GARG research group at Southern Cross University.

“This means that the brains of our ancestors developed under the influence of a potent toxic metal, which may have shaped their social behaviour and cognitive abilities over millennia.”

From fossils to function: lead and the language gene

The team also turned to the lab to explore how this ancient exposure might have affected brain development. Using human brain organoids, miniature, lab-grown models of the brain, they compared the effects of lead on two versions of a key developmental gene called NOVA1, a gene known to orchestrate gene expression upon lead exposure during neurodevelopment. The modern human version of NOVA1 is different from that found in Neanderthals and other extinct hominids, but until now, scientists did not know why this change evolved.

When organoids carrying the archaic NOVA1 variant were exposed to lead, they showed marked disruptions in the activity of FOXP2 – expressing neurons in the cortex and thalamus – brain regions that are critical for the development of speech and language. This effect was far less pronounced in organoids with the modern NOVA1 variant.

“These results suggest that our NOVA1 variant may have offered protection against the harmful neurological effects of lead,” said Professor Alysson Muotri, Professor of Pediatrics/Cellular & Molecular Medicine and Director of the UC San Diego Sanford Stem Cell Institute Integrated Space Stem Cell Orbital Research Center.

“It’s an extraordinary example of how an environmental pressure, in this case, lead toxicity, could have driven genetic changes that improved survival and our ability to communicate using language, but which now also influence our vulnerability to modern lead exposure.”

Genetics, neurotoxins, and the making of modern humans

Genetic and proteomic analyses in this study revealed that lead exposure in archaic-variant organoids disrupted pathways involved in neurodevelopment, social behaviour, and communication. The altered FOXP2 activity in particular points to a possible link between ancient lead exposure and the evolutionary refinement of language abilities in modern humans.

“This study shows how our environmental exposures shaped our evolution,” said Professor Manish Arora, Professor and Vice Chairman of Environmental Medicine.

“From the perspective of inter-species competition, the observation that toxic exposures can offer an overall survival advantage offers a fresh paradigm for environmental medicine to examine the evolutionary roots of disorders linked to environmental exposures.”

Modern lessons from an ancient problem

While lead exposure today is mostly due to human industry, it remains a serious global health issue, particularly for children. The findings underscore how deeply intertwined environmental toxins and human biology have been and warn that our vulnerability to lead may be an inherited legacy of our past.

“Our work not only rewrites the history of lead exposure,” added Professor Joannes-Boyau, “it also reminds us that the interaction between our genes and the environment has been shaping our species for millions of years, and continues to do so.”

About the research

The study analysed fossil teeth from Africa, Asia, Europe, and Oceania, using advanced geochemical mapping to identify patterns of childhood lead exposure. Laboratory experiments with brain organoids carrying either modern or archaic NOVA1 genes examined the effects of lead on brain development, with a focus on FOXP2, a gene central to speech and language. Genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data were integrated to build a comprehensive picture of how lead may have influenced the evolution of hominid social behaviour and cognition.

Did lead limit brain and language development in Neanderthals and other extinct hominids?


Ancient human relatives were exposed to lead up to two million years ago, according to a new study. However, a gene mutation may have protected modern human brains, allowing language to flourish.



University of California - San Diego

Skull 

image: 

UC San Diego researchers have found high levels of lead in the teeth of both Neanderthals (left) and modern humans (right). However, a gene mutation may have protected modern human brains, allowing language to flourish.

view more 

Credit: Kyle Dykes/UC San Diego Health Sciences





What set the modern human brain apart from our now extinct relatives like Neanderthals? A new study by University of California San Diego School of Medicine and an international team of researchers reveals that ancient hominids — including early humans and great apes — were exposed to lead earlier than previously thought, up to two million years before modern humans began mining the metal. This exposure may have shaped the evolution of hominid brains, limiting language and social development in all but modern humans due to a protective genetic variant that only we carry. The study was published in Science Advances on October 15, 2025.

The researchers analyzed fossilized teeth from 51 hominids across Africa, Asia and Europe, including modern and archaic humans such as Neanderthals, ancient human ancestors like Australopithecus africanus, and extinct great apes such as Gigantopithecus blacki.

They detected lead in 73% of the specimens, including 71% of modern and archaic humans. Notably, G. blacki fossils dating back 1.8 million years showed the most frequent acute lead exposure.

It’s long been assumed that humans have been exposed to harmful amounts of lead since antiquity — when the Romans used lead pipes to transport water — and that lead contamination increased significantly during the Industrial Revolution, only to be curtailed during the late twentieth century. 

“We stopped using lead in our daily lives when we realized how toxic it is, but nobody had ever studied lead in prehistory,” said corresponding author Alysson Muotri, Ph.D., professor of pediatrics and cellular & molecular medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine, associate director of the Archealization Center and director of the Sanford Integrated Space Stem Cell Orbital Research Center.

Surprisingly, teeth from people born between the 1940s and 1970s — when children were exposed to leaded gasoline and paint — showed similar patterns of lead exposure to fossilized human teeth.

The team hypothesizes that, like the Romans, ancient humans and other hominids may have been exposed to lead because of their need for water.

“One possibility is that they were looking for caves with running water inside,” Muotri said. “Caves contain lead, so they were all contaminated. Based on the tooth enamel studies, it started very early in infancy.”

Lead exposure impedes brain development, leading to deficits in intelligence and difficulties with emotional regulation.

Given these findings, Muotri and his team wondered how the modern human brain had flourished despite exposure to lead during our evolution.

A tiny genetic change

A gene called neuro-oncological ventral antigen 1 (NOVA1) plays a central role in human brain development and synapse formation. Considered the master regulator of neurodevelopment, NOVA1 controls how neural progenitor cells respond to lead. Disruption of NOVA1 activity is linked to several neurological disorders. 

Most modern humans have a variant of NOVA1 gene that differs by a single DNA base pair from the ancestral version that was present in Neanderthals. Previous work by Muotri and his colleagues showed that replacing the human NOVA1 variant with the archaic variant resulted in significant changes to the architecture and synaptic connectivity of tiny stem-cell-derived models of human brains called organoids.

“Everything about the organoids is identical except for that genetic variant, allowing us to ask whether that specific mutation between us and Neanderthals is giving us any advantage,” said Muotri. The archaic variant accelerated brain maturation but resulted in less complexity over time. “If all humans have this newer mutation in all corners of the world, very strong genetic pressure must have selected for it in our species.”

To explore whether environmental lead exposure influenced this selection, the team created brain organoids with both the human and archaic NOVA1 variants and exposed them to lead. They then compared the development of their cortical and thalamic neurons.

Lead exposure altered NOVA1 expression in both variants, affecting genes linked to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and epilepsy.

However, only the archaic NOVA1 variant changed the expression of FOXP2, a gene essential for language and speech development. People with certain FOXP2 mutations cannot produce sophisticated language.

“These type of neurons related to complex language are susceptible to death in the archaic version of NOVA1,” said Muotri. “ The FOXP2 gene is identical between us and the Neanderthals, but it's how the gene is regulated by NOVA1 that likely contributes to language differences.”

Evolutionary implications

The findings suggest that the acquisition of the modern NOVA1 variant may have protected us from the detrimental effects of lead, promoting complex language development and social cohesion. This could have given modern humans a significant evolutionary advantage over Neanderthals, even in the presence of lead contamination.

Muotri believes these results have important implications for understanding how environmental stressors shaped brain development during human evolution. He speculates that lead exposure may have contributed to the extinction of Neanderthals around 40,000 years ago.

“Language is such an important advantage, it’s transformational, it is our superpower,” said Muotri. “Because we have language, we are able to organize society and exchange ideas, allowing us to coordinate large movements. There is no evidence that Neanderthals could do that. They might have had abstract thinking, but they could not translate that to each other. And maybe the reason is because they never had a system to communicate that was as efficient as our complex language.”

Understanding how NOVA1 gene variants can affect FOXP2 expression helps elucidate the relationship between lead contamination and brain development and also sheds light on neurological conditions related to language, including speech apraxia — a condition that makes it difficult to produce speech sounds correctly — and autism.

The study's co-authors included Janaina Sena de Souza, Sandra M. Sanchez-Sanchez, Jose Oviedo, University of California San Diego; Marian Bailey and Matthew Tonge at Southern Cross University; Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Southern Cross University and University of Johannesburg; Justin W. Adams, University of Johannesburg and Monash University; Christine Austin, Manish Arora, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kira Westaway, Macquarie University; Ian Moffat, Flinders University and University of Cambridge; Wei Wang and Wei Liao, Anthropology Museum of Guangxi; Yingqi Zhang, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology; Luca Fiorenza, Monash University and Johann Wolfgang Goethe University; Marie-Helene Moncel, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle; Gary T. Schwartz, Arizona State University; Luiz Pedro Petroski and Roberto H. Herai, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná; Jose Oviedo, University of Arizona; and Bernardo Lemos, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.

The study was funded, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 ES027981, P30ES023515, R01ES026033), the Australian Research Council (grant DP170101597), the National Science Foundation (grant BCS 0962564), and the The Leakey Foundation.

Disclosures: Muotri is the co-founder of and has an equity interest in TISMOO, a company specializing in genetic analysis and human brain organogenesis. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California San Diego in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies.

More information, including a copy of the paper, can be found online at the Science Advances press package at https://www.eurekalert.org/press/vancepak/.

# # #

Lead baindicates no lead exposure during tooth formation; red indicates high exposure.

Credit

UC San Diego Health Sciences

Human brain organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells (left) and genetically modified with the Neanderthal variant of the NOVA1 gene (right).

Credit

UC San Diego Health Science

Alysson Muotri, Ph.D. with brain organoids

Credit

Erik Jepsen/UC San Diego

Alysson Muotri, Ph.D.

Credit

Kyle Dykes/UC San Diego Health Sciences

Ancient teeth reveal mammalian responses to climate change in Southeast Asia


New isotopic analysis of fossil teeth uncovers how dietary flexibility determined survival or extinction over the last 150,000 years



Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology

Picture1_teeth.jpg 

image: 

Examples of fossil teeth analyzed in this study, including specimens of 1) a macaque, 2) an extinct giant tapir, 3) a wild boar, 4) a wild large-sized bovid, 5) a tiger, 6) a porcupine, 7) a Sumatran rhinoceros, 8) a dhole, 9) an orangutan and 10) a giant panda. 

view more 

Credit: Dr. Nicolas Bourgon





A new study published in Science Advances and led by the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology uncovers how flexibility made the difference between survival and extinction. By analyzing fossil teeth from Vietnam and Laos, an international team reconstructed the diets and habitats of extinct, extirpated, and still-living species. The results show that animals with varied diets and habitats were more likely to endure, while narrow specialists largely disappeared.

The team examined 141 fossil teeth dating from 150,000 to 13,000 years ago and combined them with existing records. Using stable isotope analysis of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and zinc, they examined dietary responses to environmental shifts.

“By analyzing chemical traces in tooth enamel, we can piece together ancient diets and environments in remarkable detail,” says lead author Dr. Nicolas Bourgon. “Comparing species across time shows why some survived while others vanished.”

Animals like sambar deer, macaques, and wild boar proved adaptable, as reflected in wide isotopic ranges. In contrast, specialists such as orangutans, tapirs, and rhinoceroses showed narrower profiles tied to particular habitats. As environments shifted, generalists endured while specialists were left vulnerable.

Orangutans, now limited to Borneo and Sumatra, once ranged widely across Southeast Asia. Isotope results suggest they consistently relied on fruit from closed-canopy forests, even during environmental change.

“Even though modern orangutans can turn to alternative foods during hard times, their survival still depends on intact forests,” says Dr. Nguyen Thi Mai Huong, co-author from the Anthropological and Palaeoenvironmental Department of Vietnam’s Institute of Archaeology. “It looks like this has been true for tens of thousands of years.”

With Southeast Asia facing the fastest tropical deforestation worldwide, the lessons from the past are urgent. “Understanding how species coped with ancient pressures helps predict their resilience today,” said senior author Prof. Patrick Roberts of the Max Planck Institute. The study highlights the need to conserve not just species, but the ecological conditions that sustain them.

“This is about more than just ancient animals,” Bourgon adds. “It’s about learning from the past to protect the future.”


  

View of the limestone hill that houses Coc Muoi cave, located near the Chinese border about 155 km northeast of Hanoi, in Vietnam’s Lang Son province. The surrounding landscape is characterized by limestone hills and tower karsts. Since the 1960s, Lang Son has produced major fossil assemblages that have been central to building the biochronology of the Middle to Late Pleistocene in the Indochinese region.

Credit

Dr. Anne-Marie Bacon, UMR 8045 BABEL, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Franc

The forested entrance of Coc Muoi cave, located about 10 meters above the surrounding cultivated plain. Hidden in the limestone hills of Vietnam’s Lang Son province, the cave has preserved fossil remains of Pleistocene mammals that provide vital insights into how species responded to past climate and environmental changes.

Credit

Truong Huu Nghia, Anthropological and Palaeoenvironmental Department of Vietnam’s Institute of Archaeology



Archaeologists working deep within Coc Muoi cave during a Vietnamese–French collaborative field campaign. The illuminated excavation area yielded fossil teeth of Pleistocene mammals, later analyzed for their chemical signatures to reconstruct ancient diets and environments.

Credit

Truong Huu Nghia, Anthropological and Palaeoenvironmental Department of Vietnam’s Institute of Archaeology


Dr. Nicolas Bourgon (left) preparing samples for zinc isotope analysis, and Dr. Tina Lüdecke (right) carefully adding liquid nitrogen to a beaker as part of ultra-sensitive nitrogen isotope measurements. These cutting-edge laboratory techniques allow scientists to extract chemical signals preserved in fossil tooth enamel, providing unprecedented insights into the diets and ecological flexibility of ancient mammals.

Credit

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

 

Analysis of 4.4-million-year-old ankle exposes how earliest ancestors moved, evolved



Washington University in St. Louis
Thomas (Cody) Prang 

image: 

Thomas (Cody) Prange

view more 

Credit: WashU




For more than a century, scientists have been piecing together the puzzle of human evolution, examining fossil evidence to understand the transition from our earliest ancestors to modern humans.

A new study from Washington University in St. Louis, published October 15 in Communications Biology, presents compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans evolved from an African ape-like ancestor. With this discovery, which challenges previous findings, researchers are able to narrow the range of explanations for the origin of human lineage. In doing so, scientists are one step closer to answering one of life’s greatest questions, “where do we come from?”

The research, led by Thomas (Cody) Prang, assistant professor of biological anthropology in Arts & Sciences at WashU, revisits the breakthrough discovery of the 4.4-million-year-old Ardipithecus — nicknamed “Ardi” — which was discovered in 1994.  

Ardi is one of the oldest and most complete skeletons to ever be discovered. Approximately 1 million years older than “Lucy,” another well-known early human ancestor skeleton, Ardi represents an earlier stage of human evolution, according to Prang.

“One of the surprises in this discovery was that Ardi walked upright, yet retained a lot of ape-like characteristics, including a grasping foot,” Prang said.

“Apes, like chimpanzees and gorillas, have a big toe that’s divergent, which allows them to grip tree branches as part of a climbing lifestyle. Yet it also had features that align with our lineage. That makes Ardipithecus a true transitional species.”

Researchers initially proposed that Ardi demonstrated a generalized form of locomotion rather than behavior typical of African apes, leading them to conclude that this very early human ancestor was not similar to apes after all, Prang said. That came as a big surprise to the paleoanthropology community.

“Based on their analysis, they concluded that living African apes — like chimpanzees and gorillas — are like dead ends or cul-de-sacs of evolution, rather than stages of human emergence,” Prang said. “Instead, they thought that Ardi provided evidence for a more generalized ancestor that wasn’t similar to chimps or gorillas.”

Rethinking Ardi

By studying chimpanzees’ and gorillas’ talus — the large bone in the ankle that joins with the tibia of the leg and the calcaneus (heel) of the foot —  researchers can decipher how they move — specifically, how they climb trees vertically. This important bone also offers insight into how early species transitioned to bipedal (two-legged) locomotion.

For this study, Prang and colleagues compared Ardi’s ankle to the ankles of apes, monkeys and early humans. Their analysis showed that Ardi’s ankle is the only one in the primate fossil record that shares similarities with African apes.

According to Prang, these apes are known for their adaptations to vertical climbing and terrestrial plantigrade quadrupedalism — a form of locomotion where an animal moves on four limbs on the ground with the entire soles of its feet, including the heel, touching the surface — hinting that Ardi might have used its feet similarly. In addition to these primitive features, Ardi’s talus also exhibited characteristics suggesting an enhanced push-off mechanism in the foot. This complexity indicates a blend of climbing and walking behaviors in this early hominin species, which is pivotal in understanding the evolution of bipedalism.

“The finding is both controversial and also aligned with what people thought originally,” Prang said.

“Nobody disputes the importance of the discovery (of Ardi), of course, but many people in the field would say the initial interpretation was probably flawed. And so, this paper is a correction of that initial idea that distanced Ardi from chimpanzees and gorillas.”

It’s important to note that this paper does not imply that humans evolved from chimpanzees. However, the research adds more evidence to the hypothesis that the common ancestor humans share with chimpanzees was probably quite similar to the chimpanzees living today, Prang explained.

Contributing to the study are Matthew W. Tocheri at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Canada; Biren A. Patel at University of Southern California; Scott A. Williams at New York University; and Caley M. Orr at the University of Colorado Anschutz.