Thursday, November 06, 2025

 

US Palliative care & hospice poll reveals major gaps




Many older adults don’t know much about care options for people with serious illness, but express interest once they’re explained to them




Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan

Palliative care and hospice awareness and interest 

image: 

Findings from the National Poll on Healthy Aging about the awareness of, and interest in, palliative care and hospice among adults age 50 and over.

view more 

Credit: University of Michigan




A new poll reveals large gaps in older adults’ knowledge about two types of care that could help them or their loved ones cope with a major illness or the end of life: palliative care and hospice.

Just over a third (36%) of people age 50 and over say they know something about palliative care, while the rest (64%) say they know very little or not much at all, according to new findings from the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging

A higher percentage of older adults said they know something about hospice care, with 68% saying they know something about this form of end-of-life care that emphasizes comfort, pain relief and dignity. But 32% said they know very little or not much at all about hospice care.

Palliative care is type of care for patients living with a serious, incurable illness (such as congestive heart failure, advanced dementia or cancer) that aims to help a person live as well as they can with their illness by focusing on symptom control, psychosocial support and advance care planning.

Hospice is a form of palliative care for those patients with a serious illness who have reached the terminal stages of a disease and who have opted to focus on comfort rather than disease-specific treatment such as chemotherapy or dialysis.

But patients whose conditions aren’t yet terminal can receive palliative care, to increase comfort and reduce stress even while they also receive treatment to cure or manage their illness.

After gauging general awareness, the poll described both kinds of care to respondents age 50 and over across the United States, then asked how interested they would be in receiving these types of care should they need them.

After receiving a definition of both types of care, 84% of older adults said they’d be interested in receiving palliative care if they had a serious illness, and 85% expressed interest in receiving hospice care if they were dying.

Demographic differences

Beyond the overall lack of knowledge about two rapidly growing types of care, the poll reveals differences in understanding and interest by race, ethnicity, gender, education, income and previous knowledge.

White and Asian-American older adults were nearly twice as likely as Black or Hispanic older adults to know something or a lot about palliative care (40%, 36% vs. 21%, 22% respectively).

Awareness of hospice differed too, with both Black (52%) and Asian American (53%) respondents far less likely than white adults (72%) or Hispanic adults (68%) to know something about the end-of-life option.

Explaining hospice and palliative care even briefly appeared to make a difference. Those expressing interest in palliative care included 79% of those who’d said they didn’t know about it when they were first asked. Those expressing interest in hospice care included 75% of those who’d said they didn’t know about hospice when first asked.

Among those who had said they knew about palliative care before taking the poll, 92% said they’d be interested in receiving palliative care if they had a serious illness. And 89% of those who had known about hospice before taking the poll said they’d be interested in receiving hospice care if they were dying.

Still, gaps persisted, with women and those with higher levels of education or household income more likely to be very interested t in both types of care, compared with men and with those whose formal education ended before a bachelor's degree, or have household incomes under $60,000.

“We clearly have our work cut out for us to increase understanding of both these types of care, but especially palliative care,” said Adam Marks, M.D., M.P.H., a physician specializing in palliative care at U-M Health who also works as a hospice physician with a southeast Michigan hospice provider. 

“As more hospitals, cancer centers and other health care locations increase the availability of palliative care, it’s important for everyone to know that if their care team mentions this type of care, it’s not a sign that they’re ‘giving up’ on treatment. Rather, palliative care providers can be a standard part of their care team to address the symptoms of serious illness and the side effects of treatment,” added Marks, who is a clinical professor of internal medicine at the U-M Medical School. “And as more hospice providers offer care to people with more diagnoses at the end of life, it’s important for older adults to know it can be an option for them.”

Primary care providers and specialists should also be aware of the gaps in knowledge that their patients might have, especially those coping with an illness or a treatment side effect that causes pain, nausea, sleep problems, constipation, fatigue, shortness of breath or loss of appetite, said poll director Jeffrey Kullgren, M.D., M.P.H., M.S.

“Doctors, nurse practitioners and other providers may find themselves recommending these options to their patients, but our poll findings suggest that such conversations should perhaps start by gauging their level of awareness and knowledge, and offering definitions and descriptions before asking how they’d like to proceed,” said Kullgren, who practices at the VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and is an associate professor of internal medicine at the U-M Medical School.

The poll is supported by Michigan Medicine, U-M’s academic medical center that includes both U-M Health and the Medical School. It’s based at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, of which Marks and Kullgren are both members. The Michigan-specific findings are made possible by support from the Michigan Health Endowment Fund.

Michigan-specific findings

In addition to the national findings, the poll team also analyzed data from adults age 50 and older in Michigan for the Michigan Poll on Healthy Aging. They compared the results with data from older adults in the rest of the country.

In all, 33% of older Michiganders were aware of palliative care, about the same as the national percentage, leaving 67% saying they knew little or nothing about it. But after being given the definition of palliative care, 79% of Michiganders were interested in receiving palliative care if they had a serious illness, compared with 84% of older adults in the rest of the country.

Michiganders were as likely as those in the rest of the U.S. to know about (68%) and be interested in (82%) hospice care. However, there was a sizable gap in hospice interest between Black Michiganders (70%) and white Michiganders (84%).

Urban residents in Michigan showed lower interest in hospice care than suburban and rural residents (73% vs. 84%).

Just as with the national data, Michiganders with a bachelor’s degree or higher, and those with household incomes over $60,000 were more likely to be very interested in receiving hospice care if they were dying.

Definitions used in the poll:

Palliative care is the treatment of the discomfort, symptoms, and stress of serious illness. It provides relief from distressing symptoms including pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, constipation, nausea, loss of appetite and problems with sleep. It can also help you deal with the side effects of the medical treatments you're receiving. 

Hospice care, at the end of life, always includes palliative care. A team of health care professionals and volunteers provides it. They give medical, psychological, and spiritual support. The goal of the care is to help people who are dying have peace, comfort, and dignity. The caregivers try to control pain and other symptoms so a person can remain as alert and comfortable as possible. Hospice programs also provide services to support a patient's family.

To find information about nearby hospice and palliative care providers, and other resources for older adults, one key resource is the Area Agency on Aging serving the region where the person lives. Find the AAA serving any area of the United States here.

About the poll

The poll findings come from a nationally representative survey conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago for IHPI and administered online and via phone in February 2025 among 1,353 Michigan adults age 50 to 95 and to 2,528 non-Michigan adults ages 50 to 97. The sample was subsequently weighted to reflect the Michigan and national (non-Michigan) populations.

Read past National Poll on Healthy Aging reports and Michigan findings, and learn about the poll methodology

 

The land is sinking fast in Arizona's Willcox Basin




Groundwater extraction for irrigation is causing rapid subsidence, but state management might help slow it down




Geological Society of America

Figure 1 

image: 

Figure 1

view more 

Credit: Brian Conway





Contributed by Rudy Molinek, GSA Science Communication Fellow

Boulder, Colo., USA: In Arizona’s Willcox Basin, just over an hour east of Tucson, fissures are tearing through the earth, wells are running dry, and strange areas are flooding when it rains. The cause is clear. As large agricultural producers pump more and more groundwater for irrigation, the water table is falling, and the land surface itself is sinking.

“For a long time,” says Dr. Danielle Smilovsky, a geospatial research scientist at the Conrad Blucher Institute, “there were no water regulations there.”

In new research presented at GSA Connects 2025 in San Antonio, Texas, USA, Smilovksy catalogued the extent of subsidence in the area from a five-year study spanning 2017–2021. Using data from satellites that survey changes in the ground surface, she found some areas were sinking at rates of up to six inches per year, and almost three feet over the study period. Since the 1950s, the ground surface has sunk as much as 12 feet in the area. Currently, the Willcox Basin is experiencing the fastest subsidence in the state, but subsidence is a problem all over Arizona.

The subsidence occurs when groundwater pumping exceeds the recharge rate. As groundwater levels fall, the pore space between sediment grains in the subsurface is no longer filled with water, which usually acts like a hydraulic lift to prop up the sediment and resist the pressure of all the material stacked above.

“Over time, those pore spaces that were once being held open by water pressure start to collapse,” says Brian Conway, a geophysicist at the Arizona Department of Water Resources, “and that causes the overlying surface to sink because of the compaction that's happening in the subsurface.”

According to Conway, not only does this subsidence cause noticeable impacts on the surface like those fissures, it also creates a more pernicious problem. Once the sediment compacts, the change is permanent. Even if the groundwater is recharged, that storage space is lost forever. In a desert setting, every bit of water storage helps and a permanent loss of aquifer space makes sustainable water use even more difficult.

 

In the winter of 2022–2023, above-average precipitation and a buildup of a significant snowpack in the mountains gave officials and local residents hope that groundwater recharge might help stop the subsidence. Smilovsky found, however, that the hot, dry summer that followed mitigated any long-term benefits. While the subsidence rates did temporarily slow in the Willcox Basin, it was insufficient to stop the sinking.

Even so, there is hope that subsidence in the area could soon improve. One tool policymakers have to manage groundwater levels and prevent further subsidence is to declare a region an Active Management Area, or AMA. This year, they did just that after a ballot initiative in 2022 to do so failed. While the details of the regulation are still being worked out, AMAs have helped significantly in other Arizona basins experiencing subsidence.

“Especially in the Phoenix and Tucson areas, groundwater levels are recovering, and we’ve seen subsidence rates decrease quite a bit,” says Conway. “In the Tucson area, we're not even seeing subsidence anymore with the groundwater management.”

But, the changes that have happened already in the Willcox Basin are locked in. “It needs to not be a desert” with such high demand for groundwater to significantly recover water levels, says Smilovsky. “I don’t think subsidence will ever stop, but an AMA might slow it down a bit.”

Recharged but Not Recovered: InSAR Observations of Persistent Land Subsidence in Arizona’s Willcox Basin
Corresponding Author: Danielle Smilovsky, Conrad Blucher Institute, Texas A&M University Corpus Christi, Danielle.Smilovsky@tamucc.edu
120: T101, Land Surface Subsidence: Processes, Impacts, and Ongoing Challenges


Figure 2

Figure 3

Credit

Brian Conway

About the Geological Society of America

The Geological Society of America (GSA\\\\\\\\\\\) is a global professional society with more than 17,000 members across over 100 countries. As a leading voice for the geosciences, GSA advances the understanding of Earth's dynamic processes and fosters collaboration among scientists, educators, and policymakers. GSA publishes Geology, the top-ranked geoscience journal, along with a diverse portfolio of scholarly journals, books, and conference proceedings—several of which rank among Amazon's top 100 best-selling geology titles.

###

 

Historic maps reveal 99 per cent loss of meadows in the South Downs countryside



New study shows centuries of farming and policy change have reshaped the rural landscape in the English National Park



University of Portsmouth




new study from the University of Portsmouth has uncovered a dramatic collapse in traditional meadowland across the lower Rother catchment in the South Downs, West Sussex, with losses of up to 99.9 per cent since the mid-19th century. 

Using digitised Victorian tithe maps of the catchment, researchers compared historical records from around 1840 with modern land cover data from 2021. The results reveal how shifts in farming practices, land ownership and environmental policy have transformed the English countryside. 

The study found that: 

  • Meadows have declined by between 75.6 per cent and 99.9 per cent, representing the greatest loss of any land cover type. 

  • Unimproved grassland, once rich in biodiversity, has fallen by 86.5 per cent. 

  • Arable land has reduced by 45.5 per cent, while improved grassland has increased by 135.8 per cent. 

  • Woodland has expanded by 56.3 per cent. 

  • Although the total area of common land has barely changed (down 1.7 per cent), its use has shifted from shared grazing to largely recreational woodland. 

Dr Cat Hudson, from the School of Environment and Life Sciences at the University of Portsmouth, said: “Our findings show just how much the English countryside has changed since the 1840s. Meadows, once vital for haymaking, grazing and wildlife, have almost vanished. Understanding this transformation is essential if we want to restore biodiversity and build more sustainable landscapes.” 

The team’s analysis demonstrates how agricultural intensification, enclosure, and later government subsidy schemes have gradually reshaped farmland since the Industrial Revolution. Once-common communal meadows and pastures gave way to private, more intensively managed fields. This process improved productivity but reduced habitat diversity and increased risks of soil erosion, biodiversity loss, and water quality degradation, which remain pressing issues for land managers and policymakers. 

Dr Hudson added: “The landscapes we see today are the product of centuries of adaptation. But the historical record shows that past changes often came at the cost of natural resilience. Using tithe maps helps us understand how to balance productivity, conservation, and heritage in the face of climate change.” 

The research highlights the importance of long-term evidence in shaping sustainable land management policies. By using historical landscape data, such as tithe maps and early land use records, policymakers can better target environmental interventions to address modern challenges like soil degradation, carbon loss, and habitat fragmentation. 

Dr Harold Lovell, from the School of Environment and Life Sciences at the University of Portsmouth, said: “Historical records offer a powerful tool for identifying where restoration could have the greatest impact. By recognising the cultural and environmental significance of features like meadows, hedgerows and field boundaries, we can encourage interventions that protect both the landscape’s heritage and its future ecological health.” 

The study recommends that policymakers use historical landscape evidence to inform targeted agri-environmental interventions, ensuring that efforts to improve soil health, carbon storage, and biodiversity also respect and restore traditional landscape features. 

The findings support the UK Government’s 25 Year Environment Plan, which calls for the restoration of semi-natural grasslands, conservation of ancient woodland, and protection of rural heritage features such as hedgerows and field boundaries. They also provide an evidence base to guide local land management within the South Downs National Park and beyond, helping authorities like Natural England and the South Downs National Park Authority to deliver policies that integrate cultural heritage with modern environmental goals. 

“By linking the past to the present, we can make better decisions about the future of our countryside,” added Dr Harold Lovell. “Historical evidence like this can guide us toward farming systems that are productive, resilient, and rooted in the landscapes that shaped them.”