Saturday, January 25, 2025


Is the Collapse Coming Soon?



January 24, 2025
Facebook

What does it say about a society when its scholars turn increasingly to studies of the downfall of civilizations, the end of empires, the concept of human extinction, and even “existential risk”?  That scholarly attention in both Europe and America turned to something that was labeled “collapsology” in 2015, and an academic volume of Futures in January 2023 listed the existing literature on “societal collapse” as 361 peer-reviewed articles and 73 books since 2010? That the Wikipedia entry on “Existential Risk Studies” has 670,000 links?  And that JSTOR, the basic digital library of academic journals worldwide, in 2020 listed 66,809 results for articles on “human extinction”–and in 2025 listed 153,885.

I don’t know about you, but to me it suggests that a lot of smart folks are worrying about something the majority of people sense is in the deep background of life but most don’t want even to think about,  much less confront:  Western civilization, and perhaps the whole of the world, faces an imminent end, with one possibility being a tragedy so vast—nuclear warfare, global overheating, overwhelming disease pandemics—that it ends human life on earth.  And only scholars care.

One branch of this new wave of intellectual attention has been the study of the reasons for societal collapse, including a close study of the lifespan of empires and civilizations in the past.  One exhaustive search by Luke Kemp, a BBC correspondent and a professor at the Cambridge University—get this—Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, was published in 2019, and he found an average lifespan, of societies from the Akkadian empire of the 24th century BC down to the modern age, of 336 years.  It is very difficult to find an exact date for the “rise” of anything so complex as a civilization and often of its “fall,” though in the case of coinciding empires it is sometimes easier to find the date when one king or emperor comes to the throne and when the last such office existed, so such an exact figure must be taken as suggestive only.

That 336 figure suggests that underlying each civilization is an inherent fragility, and many scholars, following Joseph Tainter, whose definitive Collapse of Complex Societies came out in 1990, suggest that it is the inevitable complexity of such societies that leads to their fall.  Civilizations begin with an aggregation of traits, each with some complications, and as they develop they tend to create larger societies, more developed governments, greater bureaucracies, multiple armies, and still a wider array of problems, until the whole edifice begins to stretch and crack. Collapse, says Kemp, is “a normal phenomenon for civilizations, regardless of their size and shape,” and greater size is not a defense “against societal dissolution.”

Or, taken another way, there are inevitable limits to the growth of civilizations, and once those limits are passed—a condition modern ecologists call “overshoot”—there is no survival possible.  An interesting study on exactly those lines, Limits to Growth by a team of MIT scientists in 1972, showed by computer analysis that “if the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime in the next one hundred years,” probably around 2020—30.  An update by this group in 2004 found no reason to change this prediction—indeed, it argued that the case for overshoot was even stronger than before. Obviously there has been no change since then in humankind’s “growth trends,” so the limits are very near to being reached right now.

And how long do we have?  Well, that 336 years figure for the duration of civilizations doesn’t help us much.  In our society, what we may call Western civilization, 336 years ago was 1689,  not a very significant year for either European or American history, and nothing about it to suggest the beginning of a fixed society.  And if we regard our civilization as beginning in, say, the 16thcentury with the rise of nationhood, the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the beginnings of capitalism, we overshot 336 years a century ago in the late 19th-century.  So that’s a meaningless number for us today.

It does suggest, however, a different number: the reformation began with the Lutherean theses in 1519; the high Renaissance may be dated from Michaelangelo’s Sistine Chapel in 1512 and his Laurentian Chapel in 1525; nationalism may be dated to the battle of Pavia in 1525 creating the Spanish state and the simultaneous end of the Peasants’ War; Durer’s Course in the Art of Measurement in 1525, the first book on mathematics written (in German) for the general public; Durer in 1516 celebrated the rise of European scholarship with a copper engraving of Erasmus, “the Prince of Humanism”; and the first publication of Galen’s classical book on treating diseases was published by the Aldine Press in Venice in 1515.

Thus it can be fairly said that the modern European civilization of which we are the inheritors today began in the early 16th century—500 years ago.

That figure 500 has been taken by other scholars as  the general duration of civilizations, examples including the Ancient Egypt Old Kingdom, Minorca, Xia and Shang dynasties in China, Phoenicia, Etruscans, Roman Republic, Roman Empire, First Chera Empire in India, Early Chola Dynasty, and Parthian Empire.  That fits nicely with our civilization—and thus predicts the beginning of the collapse as probably already having occurred, and 2025 as a fitting year for its terminus.

Nor should that idea come as much of a surprise.  Look around: not a stable nation in the lot, some veering toward a right-wing patriotism yearning for the past, others  drowning their cultures in immigration, some in total collapse.  Not a single nation with any concept at all of how to deal with global overheating, scheduled to rise to life-threatening levels before this decade is out.  Not a one with a coherent, agreed-upon vision of the future that might give the rising generations a reason to hope—except maybe Trump’s dream of reliving the Eisenhower years.

January starts with an absolutely devastating Los Angeles fire, a perfect symbol of collapse, and possibly itself a trigger to economic disasters elsewhere, while much of the rest of the country is in record freezing temperatures. (Some say the earth will end in fire, some say in ice.) Many of us will survive, in a withered world, but we might begin to prepare now for new lives in new ways, and perhaps with more humility, community, and faith.

Kirkpatrick Sale is the author of seventeen books.  A 50th anniversary reprint of his classic SDS has been published this fall (Autonomedia).

Time to Change Course and Change the Conversation from Doomsday to Peace Day



 January 24, 2025
Facebook

Image by Candice Seplow.

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, with the advice of Albert Einstein and other scientists from the Manhattan Project who developed the atomic bomb, established a Doomsday Clock, in 1947, to illustrate the annihilating danger the earth is facing since the creation of the diabolical nuclear bomb. At that time, the clock was set at 7 minutes to midnight, their estimate of how much time we had left before nuclear war would wreak catastrophic devastation on our planet and all living things in existence.

Over the years, the hands of the clock have been reset, forward and backward, as scientists and policy makers estimated how immediate the nuclear danger loomed, based on the perils faced by other countries obtaining nuclear weapons as well as new arms control measures, weapons limitations, and agreements, particularly between the US and Russia for disarmament measures. At its most optimistic, the Doomsday hands were moved to 17 minutes to midnight in 1991when the US and USSR announced the complete cessation of nuclear testing.

Shockingly, despite years of nuclear arms control measures, resulting in arsenals down from a high of 70,000 bombs at the peak of the world’s nuclear insanity, to about 12,000 today, 11,000 of which are in the US and Russia with nearly 4,000 poised and ready to go, with another 1000 held by the six other nuclear weapons states—UK, France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea– the clock has never been set closer to Doomsday than it is today—At 90 seconds to midnight!1

It’s time to transform the clock and change the conversation! Dire warnings about Doomsday have done little to increase our world’s safety these 77 years. It’s time to speak about the many possibilities and missed opportunities to create the new dawning of a Peace Day, changing the clock of doom to a clock that can tick off the many solutions that have been ignored and disregarded We must stop giving our blessing and consent to endless steps to “control” arms that lead to ever more danger as illustrated by the aging Doomsday clock.

Instead, we must demand their abolition, as we move to a nuclear free world at peace unthreatened by catastrophic annihilation. Indeed, scholars writing of the sad story of endless negotiations to control arms but never to abolish them have even coined a new term for the meaningless steps to nowhere–anti-preneurism–where instead of the US proposing abolition, or total and complete disarmament, or elimination of weapons, it is always proposing new meaningless steps towards illusory progress!2

To begin a new conversation for abolition, we must acknowledge the missed opportunities and broken promises since the dawn of the nuclear age. At the very beginning, in 1945, Stalin asked Truman to put the nuclear bomb under international control at the newly established United Nations. The US rejected Russia’s proposal and Russia got the bomb!3

When the wall came down in Germany and Gorbachev dissolved the Warsaw Pact and freed all of occupied Eastern Europe, he proposed to Reagan that the US and Russia eliminate all our nuclear weapons, provided the US would end its “Star Wars” program to dominate and control the military use of space. Reagan turned him down and Gorbachev withdrew Russia’s offer.4

Gorbachev, anxious about the fate of East Germany, urged Reagan not to take a united Germany into NATO. The Russians lost 27 million people to the Nazi onslaught of WWII! The US assured him that NATO would not expand “one inch to the east.”5

Despite repeated request to the US from Russian President Putin to honor those US promises made to Gorbachev and again to Yeltsin, the US, driven by visions of Empire steadily expanded Nato eastward. It began with Clinton’s expansion of NATO to Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic in 1999, followed by Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia in 2004, and Albania, Croatia, Montenegro and North Macedonia between 2009 and 20176. And during the war in Ukraine, Sweden and Finland joined NATO.

The US stations nuclear weapons in 5 states: Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Belgium and Turkey. Russia, during the Ukraine war, put nuclear weapons in Belarus.

Clinton led NATO in the bombing of Kosovo in 1999, bypassing Russia’s veto in the Security Council, violating the UN treaty we signed never to commit a war of aggression against another nation unless under imminent threat of attack;

Clinton refused Putin’s offer to each cut our massive nuclear arsenals to 1000 bombs each and call all the others to the table to negotiate for their elimination, provided we stopped developing missile sites in Romania;

Bush walked out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002 and Obama put the new missile base in Romania while Trump built another in Poland;

Obama pledged over one trillion dollars for the next 30 years for two new nuclear bomb factories, missiles, submarines, airplanes and warheads which was upped even more by Trump and Biden.7

Despite repeated requests from Russia and China to negotiate treaties to ban weapons in space and cyberwar in UN resolutions and negotiating forums, the US refuses to cooperate.8

We are at a turning point in history. It is time to change the conversation with bold new proposals. Proposals that are guaranteed to bring us a respite from the growing terror. Proposals that will bring a shift in planetary consciousness allowing us to respond cooperatively to the impending cataclysmic climate disaster down the road! Proposals that will usher in a rising dawn and change the Doomsday Clock to a new Peace Day clock. Mother Earth grows impatient with the folly of humankind.

Here are a series of steps that are most likely to lead to peace on earth if the US is ready to mobilize against what has been described as the MICIMATT (Military, Industrial, Congressional, Intelligence, Media, Academic Think Tank complex) and work for peace.

Take up repeated Russian and Chinese proposals for treaties to ban weapons in space and cyberwar

Reinstate the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty with Russia and remove U.S. missiles from Romania and Poland

Remove US nuclear weapons from five NATO states in a deal for Russia removing its recently placed nuclear weapons in Belarus

Take all nuclear weapons off high alert and separate the warheads from their delivery systems as China does– the wisdom of the East

Dismantle NATO and respect and honor the United Nations

There’s little doubt that Russia and China would be willing partners in these initiatives. They have been proposing them to the United States and voting on them in the UN for more than ten years.

1 https://fas.org/initiative/status-world-nuclear-forces/
2 https://www.academia.edu/77004279/Resistance_to_the_emergent_norm_to_advance_progress_towards_the_complete_elimination_of_nuclear_weapons?email_work_card=thumbnail
3 https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/soviet-union-and-baruch-plan/
4 https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/reagan-and-gorbachev-reykjavik-summit/
5 https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early/
6 https://ndisc.nd.edu/news-media/news/the-addition-of-nato-members-over-time-1949-2023/
7 https://fpif.org/president-obamas-twisted-nuclear-weapons-legacy/#!
8 https://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/disarmament-fora/cd/2014/cd-reports/8908-russia-and-china-table-new-draft-treaty-to-prevent-weapons-in-space

This piece first appeared on Toward Freedom.

Alice Slater is a founder of Abolition 2000, which works for a treaty to ban nuclear weapons.