Wednesday, December 24, 2025

 

Why swearing makes you stronger



Swearing boosts performance by helping people feel focused, disinhibited, study finds



Peer-Reviewed Publication

American Psychological Association



Letting out a swear word in a moment of frustration can feel good. Now, research suggests that it can be good for you, too: Swearing can boost people’s physical performance by helping them overcome their inhibitions and push themselves harder on tests of strength and endurance, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.

“In many situations, people hold themselves back – consciously or unconsciously – from using their full strength,” said study author Richard Stephens, PhD, of Keele University in the U.K.  “Swearing is an easily available way to help yourself feel focused, confident and less distracted, and ‘go for it’ a little more.” 

The article was published in the journal American Psychologist.

Previous research by Stephens and others has found when people swear, they perform better on many physical challenges, including how long they can keep their hand in ice water and how long they can support their body weight during a chair push-up exercise.

“That is now a well replicated, reliable finding,” Stephens said. “But the question is -- how is swearing helping us? What's the psychological mechanism?”

He and his colleagues believed that it might be that swearing puts people in a disinhibited state of mind. “By swearing, we throw off social constraint and allow ourselves to push harder in different situations,” he said. 

To test this, the researchers conducted two experiments with 192 total participants. In each, they asked participants to repeat either a swear word of their choice, or a neutral word, every two seconds while doing a chair pushup. After completing the chair pushup challenge, participants answered questions about their mental state during the task. The questions included measures of different mental states linked to disinhibition, including how much positive emotion participants felt, how funny they found the situation, how distracted they felt and how self-confident they felt. The questions also included a measure of psychological “flow,” a state in which people become immersed in an activity in a pleasant, focused way.

Overall, and confirming earlier research, the researchers found that participants who swore during the chair pushup task were able to support their body weight significantly longer than those who repeated a neutral word. Combining the results of the two experiments as well as a previous experiment conducted as part of an earlier study, they also found that this difference could be explained by increases in participants’ reports of psychological flow, distraction and self-confidence – all important aspects of a disinhibition.

 “These findings help explain why swearing is so commonplace,” said Stephens. “Swearing is literally a calorie neutral, drug free, low cost, readily available tool at our disposal for when we need a boost in performance.”

In the future, the researchers plan to explore whether this boost from swearing works in any context where success depends on overcoming hesitancy, according to study co-author Nicholas Washmuth, DPT, of the University of Alabama in Huntsville. “Our labs are now studying how swearing influences public speaking and romantic approach behaviors, two situations where people tend to hesitate or second-guess themselves," he said. 

Article: “Don’t Hold Back: Swearing Improves Strength Through State Disinhibition,” by Richard Stephens, PhD, Harry Dowber, MSc, and Christopher Richardson, MSc, Keele University; and Nicholas Washmuth, DPT, University of Alabama in Huntsville. American Psychologist, published online Dec. 18, 2025. 
 
CONTACT: Richard Stephens, PhD, can be reached at rstephens@keele.ac.uk
 

The American Psychological Association, in Washington, D.C., is the largest scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States. APA’s membership includes  173,000 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students. Through its divisions in 54 subfields of psychology and affiliations with 60 state, territorial and Canadian provincial associations, APA works to advance the creation, communication and application of psychological knowledge to benefit society and improve lives.

 

A delicate Antarctic balance crucial to global climate




University of Queensland
Antarctic Bottom Water at Cape Darnley 

image: 

A diagram of the influences on Antarctic Bottom Water at Cape Darnley

view more 

Credit: The University of Queensland





New findings about ocean processes in the Antarctic show melting ice shelves and changes to sea ice could have catastrophic implications for the global climate.

A team of Australian researchers led by Dr David Gwyther at The University of Queensland has identified competing forces that control the formation of some of the coldest, densest – and most important – water on the planet.

“This very cold, salty water, called Antarctic Bottom Water, is formed by the freezing of the ocean surface in sea ice factories that we call polynyas,” Dr Gwyther said.

“This dense water sinks to the ocean floor where it flows northwards acting like a giant conveyor belt driving currents around the planet which influence the climate worldwide.

“Our study shows the formation of bottom water is a fine balance between strong coastal winds, sea-ice growth and the volume of fresh water released by melting ice shelves.

“The interaction between these processes determines how much dense water is formed and this balance could shift under climate change.

“Increased ice shelf melt, or reduced sea ice growth can weaken dense water production.

“This is important, as changes to dense water production might over time impact global ocean circulation and affect climate patterns such as rainfall in Africa or temperatures in Europe.”

Antarctic Bottom Water is formed at 4 known locations, and the research led by the School of the Environment focussed on Cape Darnley in East Antarctica, roughly 3,000 km from the Australian mainland.

“Until now we haven’t had a clear picture of what controls Antarctic Bottom Water formation at Cape Darnley,” Dr Gwyther said.

“We built an advanced regional ocean simulation that includes salinity, temperature, water currents, sea ice and wind data.

“We found 2 neighbouring systems played opposing and very delicately balanced roles in the production of bottom water.

“Meltwater flowing from beneath the Amery Ice Shelf freshens the water flowing northwards to Cape Darnley and suppresses dense water formation.

“Conversely, sea ice production in the nearby Mackenzie Polynya region between the Amery Ice Shelf and Cape Darnley increases salinity and strengthens dense water formation.

“These 2 systems influence Cape Darnley’s dense water formation in opposite directions.

“If the balance were to shift through more melting ice or a reduction in polynya activity, we could see major changes in how much dense water forms and flows into the global ocean.”

The team found that if Amery Ice Shelf melting doubles, dense water export decreases by about 7 per cent, while if sea ice production at Mackenzie Polynya shuts down, export decreases by around 36 per cent.

The research is published in Geophysical Research Letters.

It was completed in collaboration with the Australian Antarctic Division and the Australian Antarctic Program Partnership.

Iceberg at Cape Danley, East Antarctica

Credit

Sienna Blanckensee

 

UK’s worst-case climate risks laid bare for lawmakers



University of Reading






British policymakers planning for climate change now have detailed worst-case scenarios at their disposal, filling a gap that left the UK unprepared for extreme outcomes. 

Scientists from the University of Reading have mapped out the most serious plausible climate threats facing the UK, including year-round cooling of up to 6°C if the Atlantic's currents collapse, temperature rises well above 4°C, or rapid sea level rises of over 2 metres by 2100.   

The team's research, published today (Thursday, 18 December) in the journal Earth's Future, provides the practical tools that government guidance requires but that did not previously exist. Until now, sea level rise was the only area where extreme scenarios existed. 

Professor Nigel Arnell, lead author of the study, said: "The climate extremes we have mapped aren't predictions, but they are plausible.  

“The UK has been planning without the tools to test against worst-case scenarios. We've now given decision-makers what they need to prepare for climate outcomes they hope never happen, but can't afford to ignore." 

Extreme changes mapped 

The research team developed two sets of scenarios describing how climate could change in ways more severe than standard projections show. The scenarios describe physically plausible changes rather than likely outcomes. One set covers long-term changes up to 2100. The other describes extreme months and seasons that could occur at any time. 

The six long-term scenarios show how climate could change more severely than conventional projections, and include:  

  • Global temperatures rising well above 4°C by 2100 

  • Rapid aerosol emission cuts causing up to 0.75°C additional warming 

  • Major volcanic eruption causing 2.5°C cooling for five years 

  • Enhanced Arctic warming reducing UK winter temperatures by 1.5°C by 2100  

  • Atlantic ocean circulation collapse causing 2.5-6°C cooling 

  • Sea levels rising 2.0-2.2 metres by 2100 

The short-term scenarios describe extreme individual months or seasons that could occur at any time. Hot months could see temperatures 4-6°C above average, while cold months could bring temperatures 4-7°C below average. Wet months could deliver rainfall 2.5-3 times the average, while dry months could see rainfall drop to just 10% of normal levels. Windy months could experience wind speeds 60-80% higher than average.  

Online platform algorithmic control and gig workers’ turnover intention in China: The mediating role of relative deprivation




KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.






A new perspective emerged from a study published in the Journal of Management Science and Engineering: algorithmic control is not merely a "negative management tool". Instead, its three-dimensional functions (behavioral constraints, tracking evaluation, and standardized guidance) exert significantly different impacts on the turnover intention of gig workers, breaking the previous one-dimensional understanding of algorithmic control.

Simply put, the results show that behavioral constraints and tracking evaluation increase turnover intention by exacerbating relative deprivation, while standardized guidance mitigates this effect and even directly reduces turnover intention.

“Prior studies mostly focused on the overall impact of algorithmic control but ignored its functional heterogeneity,” says corresponding author Wei Cai. “Our study reveals the mediating role of ‘relative deprivation’ based on the JD-R model, and for the first time confirming that the standardized guidance inherent in algorithms can serve as a "buffering resource," providing a new approach for platforms to optimize management.”

The authors collected data from 242 food delivery riders through a two-stage questionnaire survey (one month apart) to minimize common method bias and enhance the persuasiveness of the conclusions.

“Algorithmic control does not only have negative impacts on gig workers – it can also trigger positive outcomes,” adds Cai. “This conclusion reminds platforms that there is no need to completely negate algorithmic management; instead, they can balance efficiency and humanistic care by strengthening standardized guidance (such as optimizing task matching and real-time feedback), thereby alleviating the industry pain point of high turnover rates.”

###

Contact the author: Wei Cai, School of International Studies, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, caiwei20211118@163.com

The publisher KeAi was established by Elsevier and China Science Publishing & Media Ltd to unfold quality research globally. In 2013, our focus shifted to open access publishing. We now proudly publish more than 200 world-class, open access, English language journals, spanning all scientific disciplines. Many of these are titles we publish in partnership with prestigious societies and academic institutions, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).