HE DISAGREES WITH THE BOSS
U.S. Energy Secretary: Blunt Tool of Banning Diesel Exports Doesn't Work
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright has publicly opposed calls for a ban on US diesel exports, arguing on Wednesday that the measure would backfire by increasing gasoline and jet fuel prices.
"The blunt tool of banning diesel exports definitely doesn't work," Wright said at an event in New York, as reported by Reuters.
Wright said restricting exports would leave refiners with excess diesel inventories, forcing them to cut refinery output.
Lower refinery runs, he warned, would tighten supplies of other fuels, ultimately driving up costs for consumers and businesses.
His comments put him at odds with President Trump, who signaled support for the idea on Tuesday as diesel prices surge to record highs in the US and Europe (and Treasury Secretary Bessent has been assigned to see "if it's feasible."
Trump's comments already sent European prices for the fuel surging.
With flows from the region’s top supplier at risk, Bloomberg reports that European diesel’s premium to Brent crude jumped to more than $95 a barrel on Wednesday, a record in Bloomberg data going back to 2011.
Known as the crack spread, the indicator has been keenly watched by central bankers as they seek to tame inflation. The equivalent measure in the US, meanwhile, weakened.
Trump’s threat comes as Europe is already grappling with the loss of diesel shipments from the Middle East, and Russian export curbs have tightened the global fuel market further. The US has become Europe’s main overseas supplier, with American exports of the workhorse fuel surging to a weekly record near 2 million barrels a day last month.
A key US oil industry group cautioned against the move, saying it could lower American fuel production and damage the global economy.
Of the 8 million barrels of diesel traded globally by sea each day, the U.S. supplies about 1.5 million of them - about 20%. An export ban would remove the single largest source of global diesel from the market, and the consequences could be catastrophic.
“Restricting exports is not a solution to high prices,” the American Petroleum Institute says.
“Removing US diesel from the market could instead result in reduced refinery runs, global economic damage and even higher US prices.”
Indeed, as Bloomberg macro strategist Michael Ball wrote this morning, while the White House may be able to engineer a brief drop in US diesel prices by limiting exports, it risks creating a bigger supply problem down the road.
With distillate stocks at seasonally record lows...
...the appeal is obvious with US diesel above $6.50 a gallon...
But a broad curb could strand as much as 1.5 million barrels a day, roughly 29% of US diesel output.
If enacted, Ball writes, the effects would be uneven across the US.
A surplus would build on the Gulf Coast, while pipeline, shipping and fuel-specification constraints limit how easily those barrels can reach tighter East and West Coast markets.
Bloomberg Intelligence estimates Gulf Coast storage could only absorb about three weeks of net diesel exports before constraints bite.
The global impact would be worse.
Kpler argues there is no real replacement for US export volumes, leaving Latin America and Northwest Europe particularly exposed and increasing competition for Indian barrels.
China could compound the squeeze as domestic inventories fall and the risk of renewed export curbs rises.
The response from refiners would create a negative feedback loop.
If trapped barrels crush margins, refiners are incentivized to cut runs and undertake maintenance.
S&P Global Energy estimates crude runs might need to fall by nearly 2 million barrels a day - more than 10% of the current production level - to clear the surplus.
That is the asymmetry: lower US diesel prices first, tighter global product markets follow, and potentially less US fuel supply later.
The more aggressive the restriction, the greater the risk that today’s price relief becomes tomorrow’s supply problem.
By Zerohedge.com
Global Refinery Crunch Pushes Diesel Prices to New Records
- U.S. diesel prices have surged above $6.50 per gallon, as lost Middle Eastern and Russian fuel supplies collide with limited global refining capacity.
- Washington is debating a diesel export ban to ease domestic prices, but opponents warn it could worsen the global shortage and potentially trigger similar restrictions elsewhere.
- Europe is particularly vulnerable, having closed significant refining capacity while becoming increasingly dependent on imported crude and refined fuels from the Middle East and other regions.
U.S. diesel prices broke another record last week, topping $6.50 per gallon. In Europe, fuel prices are soaring, and shortages are looming over already struggling economies. There is simply not enough refining capacity in the world to make up for the loss of Middle Eastern and Russian barrels. And there is no quick fix.
Last week, Russia said it would extend a ban on diesel exports until the end of October, as Ukrainian drone attacks on refineries continued, despite President Donald Trump’s call on the Zelensky government to stop attacking energy infrastructure, blaming the diesel price surge solely on those attacks. The latest attack came on Sunday, targeting one of Russia’s largest refineries.
However, the loss of fuel supply from the Middle East is much larger, the Wall Street Journal reported last week, citing figures from the International Energy Agency showing the amount of diesel output lost in the Middle East was three times as high as lost Russian supply.
Now, there are calls in Congress for a U.S. ban on diesel exports. Rep. Tim Burchett tabled a bill to that effect last week, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune has backed the proposal. Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum oppose it as a bad idea that would ultimately backfire, but the very fact that some legislators considered an export ban suggests the supply situation is pretty grim even for the world’s largest oil producer.
Diesel prices underpin the price of pretty much everything else. When they rise, other prices follow, notably food prices, to which people are particularly sensitive. This is of particular concern in Washington ahead of the midterm elections in November, hence the idea of an export ban. A ban could bring down prices at home, but it would push prices even higher elsewhere, aggravating an already quite grave fuel supply crisis. It is a crisis that no one could have foreseen, but also one that might have arguably been less grave had there been more refining capacity in the world.
The fact is that over the past decade or so, a lot of refineries have been shut down under pressure from the net-zero movement that has come to dominate energy policies, mainly in Europe, but also in the U.S. under Democratic administrations. Refining had become a losing game for many, so they either shut down or converted their capacity to biofuels.
“We’ve seen the oil majors effectively reduce their exposure to that sector because the returns on actual capital employed have been poor,” Wood Mackenzie senior VP for refining, chemicals, and oil markets Alan Gelder told the Wall Street Journal. “The classic phrase we used was: ‘How do you make a small fortune? Take a large fortune and build a refinery.’”
While refineries closed in Europe and the United States, however, Middle Eastern petrostates built new ones, coming to account for a bigger portion of global refining capacity. Profit, per the experts cited by the WSJ, was not the primary motivation. Employment and domestic fuel supply security were. Now, that capacity has been compromised – and some of it has been damaged by Iranian strikes on Gulf energy infrastructure – and there is no one to pick up the slack, with U.S. refiners already operating at rates as high as they can.
To add insult to injury, there is one refinery in Europe sitting idle because it is the property of Russia’s Lukoil, which the Trump administration sanctioned last November, prompting the company to put its international business up for sale. According to a recent report by the Financial Times, a deal between Lukoil and Carlyle Group for the latter’s acquisition of the business had become “bogged down in an inter-agency process involving the National Security Council, State Department and Department of Energy,” leaving urgently needed refining capacity offline.
“There is significant underutilised refining capacity across Lukoil’s European assets that could help bring additional refined-product supply to market and ease pressure on fuel prices,” Carlyle said, as quoted by the FT, referring probably to the Romanian Petrotel refinery, which has been idled since the U.S. sanctions went into effect. Lukoil’s Bulgarian facility is operating. Petrotel has a capacity of about 50,000 barrels daily. This is not a huge amount of fuel, but in the current crisis, every barrel matters.
There is no solution to the world’s fuel problem in sight. Tanker traffic via the Strait of Hormuz remains severely depressed, Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian refineries continue, and if the U.S. bans diesel exports, according to the WSJ, China and India may follow its example, plunging the rest of the world into hitherto unseen levels of fuel shortages. The biggest loser of the situation, it appears, will be Europe, due to its heavy dependence on energy imports in both crude oil and refined products, and its shrinking refining capacity.
By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com
No comments:
Post a Comment